Jump to content

Talk:Her Majesty's Wizard: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Insanity?: new section
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Novels}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}. (Fix Category:WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{oldafdfull| date = 16 July 2010 (UTC) | result = '''merge to [[A Wizard in Rhyme]]''' | page = Her Majesty's Wizard }}
{{NovelsWikiProject
|class=Stub
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
|importance=Mid
{{WikiProject Novels|importance=Mid|fantasy-task-force=yes}}
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20070826115304|reviewer=Graeme Bartlett|class=start}}
|fantasy-task-force=yes
}}
}}
{{WPAFC|class=start}}


== Insanity? ==
== Insanity? ==


"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters."
"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters."
Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book.
Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.166.11.82|83.166.11.82]] ([[User talk:83.166.11.82|talk]]) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Not notable? ==

This series is not Harry Potter which spawned movies, but it is a worthy endeavour at fantasy fiction, married with real-world literature and religion.
[[User:Snowybeagle|Snowybeagle]] ([[User talk:Snowybeagle|talk]]) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

:Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. [[User:Snowybeagle|Snowybeagle]] ([[User talk:Snowybeagle|talk]]) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

::So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. [[Special:Contributions/69.181.249.92|69.181.249.92]] ([[User talk:69.181.249.92|talk]]) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

:::No intent to explain to IP addresses. [[User:Snowybeagle|Snowybeagle]] ([[User talk:Snowybeagle|talk]]) 20:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

::::Well then perhaps you'll explain to me. I'm an unrelated editor who found this edit war via [[WP:AIV]]. Please explain why this article is notable, and [[WP:HUMAN|do not discriminate against IP contributors]]. '''[[User:Elektrik Shoos|<span style="color:#FFCC66;">elektrik</span>]][[User talk:Elektrik Shoos|<span style="color:#666666;">SHOOS</span>]]''' 07:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

:::::Put in my reasons in AfD talkpage.[[User:Snowybeagle|Snowybeagle]] ([[User talk:Snowybeagle|talk]]) 15:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:56, 28 November 2024

Insanity?

[edit]

"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters." Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.11.82 (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable?

[edit]

This series is not Harry Potter which spawned movies, but it is a worthy endeavour at fantasy fiction, married with real-world literature and religion. Snowybeagle (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. Snowybeagle (talk) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No intent to explain to IP addresses. Snowybeagle (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well then perhaps you'll explain to me. I'm an unrelated editor who found this edit war via WP:AIV. Please explain why this article is notable, and do not discriminate against IP contributors. elektrikSHOOS 07:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Put in my reasons in AfD talkpage.Snowybeagle (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]