Jump to content

Talk:Great Barrier Reef: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(95 intermediate revisions by 64 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{GAR/link|18:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)|page=1|GARpage=2|status= }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Australia|importance=Top|QLD=yes|maritime=yes|biota=yes|QLD-importance=Top|1=|biota-importance=top|maritime-importance=high}}
{{Vital article|topic=Geography|level=3|class=GA}}
{{WikiProject World Heritage Sites}}
{{Article history|action1=PR
{{WikiProject Geography|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Ecoregions|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Protected areas|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Underwater diving|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors |user=Finetooth |date=17 October 2007}}
}}
{{Article history
|action1=PR
|action1date=06:26, 29 June 2006
|action1date=06:26, 29 June 2006
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Great Barrier Reef/archive1
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Great Barrier Reef/archive1
Line 30: Line 38:
|action5oldid=281808074
|action5oldid=281808074


|action6=GAR
|currentstatus=GA
|action6date=11:08, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
|topic=Geography}}
|action6link=Talk:Great Barrier Reef/GA1
{{On this day|date1=2004-06-11|oldid1=5183723|date2=2005-06-11|oldid2=16335252|date3=2006-06-11|oldid3=58068658|date4=2007-06-11|oldid4=137498191|date5=2008-06-11|oldid5=218326675|date6=2009-06-11|oldid6=295844709|date7=2010-06-11|oldid7=367369404}}
|action6result=delisted
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
|action6oldid=281808074
{{WikiProject Australia|class=GA|importance=Top|QLD=yes|maritime=yes|biota=yes|QLD-importance=Top||biota-importance=top|maritime-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject World Heritage Sites|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Geography|class=GA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Ecoregions|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Protected areas|class=GA|importance=High}}
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=GA|category=Geography|VA=yes|WPCD=yes|importance=High}}}}
{{To do}}


|currentstatus=DGA
== Britannica highlight ==
|topic=Geography|otd1date=2004-06-11|otd1oldid=5183723

|otd2date=2005-06-11|otd2oldid=16335252
An article entitled [[Great Barrier Reef]] appeared at [http://www.britannica.com/ britannica.com] as a Britannica highlight on 30 May 2005. See [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9037836]. [[User:Ceyockey|Courtland]] 17:03, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
|otd3date=2006-06-11|otd3oldid=58068658

|otd4date=2007-06-11|otd4oldid=137498191
== Passed GA ==
|otd5date=2008-06-11|otd5oldid=218326675
Congratulations to editors of this article its now attain GA status. Please continue to expand the two stub sections [[User:Gnangarra|Gnangarra]] 11:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
|otd6date=2009-06-11|otd6oldid=295844709

|otd7date=2010-06-11|otd7oldid=367369404
== Conflicting numbers on size of GBR... ==
}}{{To do}}

Fodor's reference [http://www.fodors.com/miniguides/mgresults.cfm?destination=great_barrier@230&cur_section=ove] puts the number of reefs at 3,000 and islands at 900, which has been in the article for some time. However, the CRC Reef Research Centre [http://www.reef.crc.org.au/discover/coralreefs/facts_gbrwha.htm] puts the numbers at 2,900 reefs and 618 islands. I'm inclined to think the latter are better numbers than a travel guide. Also, the marine park authority states that the GBR is up to 18 million years old [http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/corp_site/info_services/publications/newsletters/reef_facts/reeffacts-01.pdf], while the CRC Reef Centre says 500,000 years old. [http://www.reef.crc.org.au/discover/coralreefs/coralgbr.html] What do people suggest we use? --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 00:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)As the relaxi as can be just relaxi ont he beach .witching the fish as you dive under water .

I think the source of the size confusion is between the Reef itself and the larger [[Great Barrier Reef Marine Park]]. I'd want to try and double-check the CRC figures with another academic source, if possible - most literature on the GBR seems to be on its health, not its size or its age/geological composition. As for the age confusion, due to fluctuating sea levels, the Reef has grown at different times - it could just be that the Marine Park Authority drilled down further. Can you locate any academic sources on either of these matters, at all? I'm willing to try and help, but I'm not very knowledgeable on what journals to go to. While I'm here, can I just please make a request to keep the article to Australian English? Thanks :) - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 00:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

:Sorry about the English changes, it's just natural for me when writing to use US English, but I am fine with it being corrected. I actually don't always know how to write in Australian English, so hopefully you will understand. I certainly didn't change any of that on purpose. One change you made, however, was adding [[Torres Strait Islanders]] under ''Human use of the Great Barrier Reef''. They are already included under the term [[Indigenous Australian]]s according to that page, so I don't know why we are singling that group out? --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 01:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

No worries. :) I must have gotten confused between "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander", as used by the [http://www.abs.gov.au/Websitedbs/c311215.nsf/20564c23f3183fdaca25672100813ef1/0179c2b24398e077ca2570a8000945d2!OpenDocument Australian Bureau of Statistics], and "Indigenous Australian" (also used by the ABS), which does seem to cover both. Whoops. - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 03:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's a [http://www.reefed.edu.au/explorer/downloads/SDC%20041206%20Sept%2004%20General%20Reference.pdf comparitive map] of the Great Barrier Reef, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, and the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 22:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

:Do you know what the usage restrictions on this are? Is it a public domain document like a map produced by the U.S. federal government would be? --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 22:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

::I'm guessing not - in general, the Australian Government keeps its copyright. I can't find a Terms of Use on ReefED (which is run by the GBRMPA), but on the main GBRMPA site it says "The information contained within this website is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 all other rights are reserved." -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 22:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

:::Yeah, sounds like we can't use it. Bummer. --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 23:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

::::We can use it as a source for the size confusion, though. (the key gives areas for the GBRWHA and GBRMP). If anyone wants further infos, they can go to the source.-[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 23:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The size confusion is between the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, which is 345 500 km squared, and the [[Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area]], which is 348 000 km squared, with 2900 reefs. However, this doesn't include the reefs found in the Torres Strait, which is estimated at an area of 37 000 km squared and with a possible 750 reefs and shoals. (Hopley ''et al.'', 2007, pp.1) Now I'm just unsure how to work that in to the article. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 21:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

==Global Warming==
Is Global Warming causing the depletion of The Great Barrier Reef? A question often up in the air. I have come to find there are various other factors contradicting this idea.

Coral bleaching is generally linked to global warming, however there are many other reasons other than just increased/decreased water temperature that could cause coral bleaching such as water acidification, silt runoffs and herbicides, low tides/reef exposure, and although many of these issues may be linked to humans, they are not necessarily linked to global warming (Ridd, Peter V. (11/2007). A CRITIQUE OF A METHOD TO DETERMINE LONG-TERM DECLINE OF CORAL REEF ECOSYSTEMS. Energy & environment (Essex, England) (0958-305X), 18 (6), 783. DOI: 10.1260/095830507782088578 [http://jennifermarohasy.com/data/Ridd_Energy%20n%20Environment.pdf]).

Various guilds are linked to destruction of Great Barrier Reefs as well. These guilds can consist of various sea lives living on and around the reefs, one in particular, the crown-of-thorns starfish. This starfish in particular eats away at the coral polyps (the organisms the reef is composed of) and has come to be one of the reefs greatest predators in which case the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park has been created to help preserve the reef and downsize the amount of destructive guilds. These guilds have absolutely nothing to do with human impact, therefore nothing to do with Global Warming; these reefs are still being destroyed without the influence of humans [[Crown-of-thorns_starfish]].[[User:Bnixo006|Bnixo006]] ([[User talk:Bnixo006|talk]]) 03:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

==Human use==
I keep on finding that the 'human use' section is retitled to 'Indigenous Australians'. Please don't do this - if you can find more information on Indigenous Australian use and association with the GBR, please feel free to expand it into a sub-section of 'human use'. As it is, 'human use' covers both Indigenous Australian use (poorly, I'll admit) and European and current usages of the Reef. - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 11:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

==Royal Commissions - Help!==
I'm going to need some help finding out anything more about the Royal Commissions on oil and the GBR. As they were from 1970-1975, there's not much on the web, and it looks like it'd be in the National Archives... Are there any things that have analysis of Royal Commissions? The thought of going to the National Archives is a bit scary... It seems like after the commissions, the governments got their skates on and turned the GBR into a park. But there's nothing really available on the GBRMPA site, or anywhere else in detail, for that matter. It just seems to be that 'There was one', and that's it. Thanks. :) - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 02:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
:Well, thus far, this you-beaut book by Hopley et al. about the geomorphology of the GBR doesn't mention hydrocarbons, natural gas, gas, or oil at all... "Don't mention the war", anyone? -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 22:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
::A little birdie has whispered in my ear that chapter 2 of "AIMS - The first twenty-five years" may cover the 1960s and 1970s, Royal Commissions, and the formation of the [[Australian Institute of Marine Science]] and the [[GBRMPA]]. This same little birdie has also recommended the Bowen book, "The Great Barrier Reef : history, science, heritage". Unfortunately, I can't get a hold of them at the present, but I can but hope! -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 12:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

== Reef vs reef ==
I agree, there is no need for the word "reef" to be capitalized unless used in the title of Great Barrier Reef [[User:G8summit|G8summit]] 20:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Why are many mentions of the word "reef" capitalized? Surely this must be a mistake.--[[User:Tug201|Tug201]] 13:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

==Automated Peer Review==
<onlyinclude>{{#ifeq:{{{name}}}|Great Barrier Reef|[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 22:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)}}</onlyinclude>The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic [[User:AndyZ/peerreviewer|javascript program]], and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Per [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Units of measurement|Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers)]], there should be a non-breaking space - <code>&amp;nbsp;</code> between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of ''25 centimetres'', use ''25&nbsp;centimetres'', which when you are editing the page, should look like: <tt>25&amp;nbsp;centimetres</tt>.<sup>[[User:AndyZ/G#nbsp|[?]]]</sup>
*This article may need to undergo [[WP:SS|summary style]], where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is [[United States]], then an appropriate subpage would be [[History of the United States]], such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.<sup>[[User:AndyZ/G#SS|[?]]]</sup>
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of [[WP:WIAFA|Wikipedia's best work]]. See also [[User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a]].<sup>[[User:AndyZ/G#copyedit|[?]]]</sup>
You may wish to browse through [[User:AndyZ/Suggestions]] for further ideas. Thanks, [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 22:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

==Vandalists==
All right now this is getting annoying! Can you guys just grow up and STOP destroying a good article on a good part of Australia. Go find something else to do, instead of vandalising wikipedia!!! [[User:Cocopopz2005|Cocopopz2005]] 04:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

== Great Barrier Reef ==

I was reading the article about the Great Barrier Reef and found that someone added a swear word(f.u.)to the article. I'm just 11 years old and I would like to do my school reports without having to worry about immature people editing the content of the articles in such a way.
I hope you will do something about it,
Sincerely,
Concered User

:Replied at this user's Talk Page. - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 08:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree with this! I'm 12 years old and while doing a report for Great Barrier Reef, I found many words that weren't appropriate. Please stop doing this!

==Gallery==
I'm just putting the gallery pictures and information here for now - the clownfish and the giant clam photo can probably be used if we expand the Species section. All of these pictures are on the wikicommons anyway, so they won't evaporate if we don't use them right this minute. - [[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 08:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

<gallery>
Image:Common clownfish.jpg|Clownfish on the Great Barrier Reef
Image:Barriere-Riff.jpg|Satellite image of the northernmost part of the Great Barrier Reef
Image:Giant clam.jpg|Giant Clam on the Great Barrier Reef
</gallery>

== Species ==

I thought I heard on a documentary that the GBR has the highest concentration of species per square kilometre, or the highest number of different species per square kilometre (or something) of any place in the world. If it can be verified, I think it'd go well in the introduction.
:It would, but you'd think the tourist brochures would be all over a figure like that. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 11:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
::I think there is greater diversity in Indonesia's reefs. [[User:Sabine's Sunbird|Sabine's Sunbird]] [[User talk:Sabine's Sunbird|<span style="color:#008000;">talk</span>]] 06:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

==Split off "Environmental threats" section?==
I'm proposing this split because I think the article is getting too long (37KBish) and the Environmental threats section is the longest. This would give room in the main GBR article for more stuff on the geology/geography and ecology/ecosystems/species stuff, which has a wider appeal. Thoughts? -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 11:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

:I don't necessarily think it is too long at this point, but it might make sense to split that section into its own article "Threats to the Great Barrier Reef". The existing text would just need to be synthesized into a few coherent paragraphs that remain in the main article. --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 17:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

::Why just 'Threats to the Great Barrier Reef'? is this this 'future proofing' that I see thrown about every so often?-[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 09:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

:::Sorry, Environmental threats is fine, I didn't purposefully leave off that word. --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 14:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

: I agree that this article should be split. This would allow for further expanding of the section without worrying about changing the context of the article in general. That way anyone just wanting info on the barrier reef can find it, while people wanting to know specifics about threats to it can find that in a separate article linked to this one in a brief section. [[User:G8summit|G8summit]] 20:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
::I've done it, but I need help summarising what's in the main article. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 22:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

== NOT an organism ==
Here is what I have heard on the Discovery channel and seen all over the internet--The [[Great Barrier Reef]] is an organism (and the world's largest).--This is NOT CORRECT! The reef chain '''itself''' is not a organism, but a collection of rock and '''dead''' coral over millions of years. The Great Barrier Reef is rather an environment that has the biggest "population density" of life per any unit of measurement. All of the life that covers the whole reef chain is entirely separate from the reef chain itself. Another thing: the reason why I said reef chain frequently is because the Great Barrier Reef is not a single reef, but a chain of thousands of reefs situated off of [[Australia]]'s coast. Therefore, two things make the "fact" that the Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest organism contrary to '''true''' fact. [[User:JustN5:12|JustN5:12]] 02:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

:Thanks for your enthusiasm on the Great Barrier Reef, but I feel I should remind you that Talk pages are for talking about the article itself, not the subject of the article. It's sometimes a difficult distinction to make. We don't say on the article that the GBR is a single organism. We say that sometimes it's ''called'' the world's largest organism, but we then go on to explain that really it's ''not'' the world's largest organism. We talk about the geological formation of the GBR in the Geology and geography section. If you can [[WP:CITE|cite]] the [[WP:RS|source]] that the GBR has the largest population density of life, that would be very much appreciated. We have some information on the life that exists in the environment of the GBR, but not lots - this is because I'm having trouble in incorporating it. If you'd like to help with that, it would be very much appreciated. We do say in the lead that the GBR is a reef system of about 3000 separate reefs.-[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 07:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

::The GBR does not have the largest population density by far. In fact some scientists compare tropical waters to deserts as far as life. Usually life is measured in [[Primary_production]] which is the grams of carbon produced per cubic metre. Since there is no plankton in this water (billions of organisms per cubic metre of water), we can safely say the reef is far behind. I think the largest population density is actually located off South America in upwelling regions (as far as oceanic life). [[User:Erick880|Erick880]] ([[User talk:Erick880|talk]]) 06:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

== Map request ==

map request <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Asphere|Asphere]] ([[User talk:Asphere|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Asphere|contribs]]){{#if:{{{2|}}}|&#32;{{{2}}}|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

What kind of map are you after? [[:Image:Map_of_Great_Barrier_Reef_Demis.png]] is a free-use one we could use - we can't use any maps made by the Australian Government for copyright reasons. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 09:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

:That map is way more informative than the image we had in lead before. Nice find. --[[User:MattWright|MattWright]] ([[User talk:MattWright|talk]]) 16:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

That map is good. It should have some labels and a scale though. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Asphere|Asphere]] ([[User talk:Asphere|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Asphere|contribs]]){{#if:{{{2|}}}|&#32;{{{2}}}|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

== No information describing the reef ==
The article talks a lot about the coral origins of the reef, its biological and ecologic significance, but nothing about ''what it is''. What would I see if I came up to the Great Barrier Reef? How big are these reef islands? Is there animal or plant life on the above-ocean reef? Are there human structures on any of them? What is the range of width dimensions of the Great Barrier Reef? Is it passable by boats? There is not even a picture of the reef except from at least a few kilometers away, and it's an actual built-up island. -[[User:Rolypolyman|Rolypolyman]] 02:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
:I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand your questions... the article says "The Great Barrier Reef in Australia is the world's largest coral reef system, composed of roughly 3,000 individual reefs and 900 islands..." What else would be useful to know about what the GBR system is? [[Image:Part of Great Barrier Reef from Helicopter.jpg|right|thumb|If you were to come to the GBR, you would see something that looked sort of like this. We decided not to use this picture as the lead picture as the map is of the whole GBR, and we liked the satellite image.]]Coral cay island sizes vary, and their sizes aren't really something I've come across in my reading. (perhaps investigate the [[:Category:Islands on the Great Barrier Reef]], or the [http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au Australian govt's website]?). There isn't really such a thing as an above-ocean reef - reefs can't grow above sea level, although I suppose at low tide they could be exposed for a short time - not long enough to have non-oceanic wildlife. Birds nest on a lot of the coral cay islands, turtles nest on some others, and I believe there is some plant life. [http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/corp_site/info_services/publications/misc_pub/fauna_flora here] is some information about some wildlife in the GBR system that isn't fully in the wikipedia article. Some coral cay islands have monitoring stations or are basically left alone, and some others have been made into coastal resorts. "What is the range of width dimensions of the Great Barrier Reef?" - are you asking how wide the GBR system is? Judging by [http://www.reefed.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/18783/SDC2004120620Sept200420General20Reference.pdf this map], (which we can't use on Wikipedia, as it's copyright to the Australian Government), I'd say it's about 300 or so kms wide at its widest point? The GBR is widely used by ships, although it is quite a dangerous route - Captain Cook famously discovered it when he ran aground on Endeavour Reef. More information about shipping in the GBR is available at [[Environmental_threats_to_the_Great_Barrier_Reef#Shipping]]. Free images that we could use of the GBR are available [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrier_Reef here], if you think there's any better feel free to swap them. If this hasn't answered your questions, I'd suggest going to [http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/ the GBRMPA website] to have a look around - maybe you'll find something and be able to include it in the article. :) -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] 00:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

==Ecology section copyedit==
{{WP LoCE
|September 2007
|[[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] 04:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)|[[User:Galena11|Galena11]] 14:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)}}

==Oldest single coral on the reef==
This has been commented out in the main article for some time now, I thought I'd put it here to save on space there. Any current references would be appreciated. -[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 22:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
"The oldest dated coral on the reef now is a species of [[Porites]] known as [[boulder coral]], which is only about 1,000 years old (it grows about 1 centimetre or 3/8&nbsp;inch per year)." Note--this used to be in the Reef Facts for Tour Guides reference until they updated it in 2006. It should not appear in this wiki article until it can be confirmed from a scientific publication.

==Stretching over 2,600 km?==
I find the figure of 2,600 km grossly exaggerated. The distance between [[Parama Island]], which is north of the northernmost extreme of the GBR, and [[Fraser Island]], which is south of the southernmost reaches of the GBR, is 2,018 km (measured by Wikimapia Geotools) [[as the crow flies]].--[[User:Ratzer|Ratzer]] ([[User talk:Ratzer|talk]]) 16:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
:Even if I follow the shape of the outer edge of the reef piecewise (as opposed to the shortest [[as the crow flies]] distance, I don't reach 2,300 km.--[[User:Ratzer|Ratzer]] ([[User talk:Ratzer|talk]]) 16:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
::Which map are you using? --[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 06:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm using a map of one to a trillion scale, I can measure around sub atomic particles, and I get a outside arc of 3 billion billion kilometers... Well its normal to use a handfull of straight lines or arcs to measure the length .. [[Special:Contributions/60.242.147.167|60.242.147.167]] ([[User talk:60.242.147.167|talk]]) 21:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)



hoped u liked the onfo i hope its usefull <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.27.56.215|24.27.56.215]] ([[User talk:24.27.56.215|talk]]) 01:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Move==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the move request was '''speedy close'''. This article is not about great [[barrier reef]]s in general. It's about one specific reef, whose name is the Great Barrier Reef. As a [[proper noun]], the name should remain capitalized. Wikipedia uses the [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Use common names of persons and things|most common name]] of the subject of the article as the article title, and in this case the most common name is unambiguously the current title. [[User:Jafeluv|Jafeluv]] ([[User talk:Jafeluv|talk]]) 09:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

----

[[:Great Barrier Reef]] → [[Great barrier reef]] &mdash; I propose a move to eliminate the large B and R so as to show that it is a [[barrier reef]] from Australia, and not a given name to a regular reef. Actually I'd even name it Australia barrier reef, but I guess that would be a stretch too far for most Wikipedians <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.245.64.171|81.245.64.171]] 07:00, August 11, 2009 (UTC)</span>
* '''Oppose'''. This is a given or proper name, therefore it is appropriately capitalized. -- '''<font color="#199199">[[User:P199|P&nbsp;1&nbsp;9&nbsp;9]]</font>'''&nbsp;•&nbsp;<small>[[User talk:P199|TALK]]</small> 13:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' per P199. [[User:Vsmith|Vsmith]] ([[User talk:Vsmith|talk]]) 16:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per P199. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 16:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' for same reasons as above. --[[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 22:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''.<br/>— [[User:Ohms law|<span class="texhtml"><i>V</i> = <i>I</i> * <i>R</i></span>]] ([[User talk:Ohms law|talk]]) 00:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Common use in English. Speedy close? [[User:Skinsmoke|Skinsmoke]] ([[User talk:Skinsmoke|talk]]) 07:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== What can we do to hurt the reef? ==


We can stop the reed from dying by cutting down the use of petrol cars and not littering near the water. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority is an authority that is protecting the reef. They say we can help at home by recycling, wash your car on the lawn, use environmentally friendly cleaners and open windows to catch the breeze instead of the air conditioner. You are also not allowed to fish on the reef. ==
kill it!

== red sea coral ==

does anyone know if thrs much research yet comparing red sea corals that thrive in warmer waters, to australian corals, in terms of adapting & engineering australian corals to warmer temps??? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:FreyasCrystalizedAngels|FreyasCrystalizedAngels]] ([[User talk:FreyasCrystalizedAngels|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FreyasCrystalizedAngels|contribs]]) 03:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Australia ==
:)
This article is really interesting and i cant wait until i can go there and really experience the dangers of scuba diving. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.160.112.150|207.160.112.150]] ([[User talk:207.160.112.150|talk]]) 15:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Cainozoic? It's Cenozoic ==

I have never even heard of this spelling before. Can we try to keep a consistent nomenclature here on Wikipedia? It's "Cenozoic" in every textbook I've ever read. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:MathUDX|MathUDX]] ([[User talk:MathUDX|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/MathUDX|contribs]]) 20:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:The cited source used [http://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=omr72hD6dvQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=Great+barrier+reef+cainozoic&ots=dD1AQA4adN&sig=3hWDSTb9iueEHvD6x4-2ttadZQM#v=snippet&q=cainozoic&f=false Cainozoic], which is probably why I used it here. Consistency throughout the whole of Wikipedia is impossible to maintain - only [[Wikipedia:MOS#Internal_consistency|consistency within an article]] is desired. --[[User:Malkinann|Malkinann]] ([[User talk:Malkinann|talk]]) 21:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

== Error in 'Management' section? ==

The 'Management' section contains the phrase "...The updated version states that to date, none of the efforts undertaken to improve the quality of water entering the reef has been '''unsuccessful'''.". It then goes on with several statements implying that none of the efforts have been ''successful'', not unsuccessful. Which is correct?
[[User:Bcb9153|Bcb9153]] ([[User talk:Bcb9153|talk]]) 17:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
:I believe this was a typo and changed to "successful". [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 04:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

== Yellow-band disease has an article on Wikipedia ==

The mentioning of Yellow-band disease in the articles 'Tourism' section is a red link that does not lead to an existing page. However this is because it is typed as "yellow band disease". The actual page is called [[Yellow-band disease]], it should be changed to that. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bibzy|Bibzy]] ([[User talk:Bibzy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bibzy|contribs]]) 09:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Fixed it, thanks for the alert. Best wishes [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DBaK]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 17:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

== with 400 types of coral &lt;ref&gt;The Telegraph stretching for ==

great to have a stupid copy/paste error right in the first paragraph of a protected page...
[[Special:Contributions/92.196.109.177|92.196.109.177]] ([[User talk:92.196.109.177|talk]]) 14:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
:Reverted, those recent edits, thanks. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 00:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

== Links ==

[vhttp://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2014/01/australia-approves-barrier-reef-dumping-plan-201413152726546347.html >> Australia agrees dumping near Barrier Reef]([[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 16:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)).

hello <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/79.41.234.64|79.41.234.64]] ([[User talk:79.41.234.64|talk]]) 22:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== External link issue ==

Recently an external link [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Great_Barrier_Reef&diff=601262617&oldid=600355821 was added to the page], in addition to the several already there. I removed it, saying in my edit summary "already too many ELs and doesn't add anything special - also not clear whose site it is or why should be included". The original editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Great_Barrier_Reef&diff=next&oldid=601265284 reverted my removal], saying "This site is better than most external links already there. So do your research". The site in question is [http://panique.com.au/trishansoz/barrier/great-barrier-reef.html here]. My view is that there is no shortage of reputable ELs in the article, such as from the Australian government's environment department, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Australia's top national research body on the reef (the CRC) as well as Australia's peak tourism body. In contrast, the site that was added is authored by one individual (though which one is actually a tricky subject: see my observations [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASenani_Ponnamperuma&diff=601336164&oldid=598371036 here]). In any case, there is no evidence that the site is peer reviewed, written by anyone with any expertise, and it is over fifteen years old. The page contains grammatical and formatting errors, also indicative of a poor quality source. My views are (1) this should not be in the external links section as it doesn't meet the cut for being important enough given the much more reliable sources available and (2) the site probably doesn't meet our criteria for being a reliable source at all, and should not be used for that reason. Can I get other editor views please? [[User:Hamiltonstone|hamiltonstone]] ([[User talk:Hamiltonstone|talk]]) 11:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

:'''Keep''': I think that the external link article is a very good one - and it is definitely more informative about the Great Barrier Reef than many of the other external links on the page. I think that the site is a very important one and deserves its place among the external links for the article and should remain. [[User:Figaro|Figaro]] ([[User talk:Figaro|talk]]) 12:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
::Can you please comment on whether it meets reliability criteria? Incidentially, I agree regardingt the Tourism Australia link - which I am removing. Also, I don't think ELs are supposed to be summary informatino of the kind that the WP article itself actually delivers. They are meant to performa function ''different'' to the function of the article itself. Sites of regulators etc do this. My view is that this site does not. [[User:Hamiltonstone|hamiltonstone]] ([[User talk:Hamiltonstone|talk]]) 22:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

== Threatened species known to occur in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area ==

Hi All

I started an article [[Threatened species known to occur in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area]], it still needs a lot of work and would appreciate some help. It's quite a complex job that would help others to be done systematically, please see the talk page for notes and information.

Many thanks

--[[User:Mrjohncummings|Mrjohncummings]] ([[User talk:Mrjohncummings|talk]]) 23:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

bli bla blu for you <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2003:73:8F69:4301:553A:B4CF:657:FD03|2003:73:8F69:4301:553A:B4CF:657:FD03]] ([[User talk:2003:73:8F69:4301:553A:B4CF:657:FD03|talk]]) 13:58, 1 November 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==
Line 291: Line 86:
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}


Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 22:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Cheers. —[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier;">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 22:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2016 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2016 ==
Line 314: Line 109:
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 19:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier;">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 19:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==
Line 345: Line 140:
== "Death" of the Great Barrier Reef ==
== "Death" of the Great Barrier Reef ==


Since this is outside my area of knowledge I'm not attempting to add this in any way. However, social media has been buzzing with declarations of the reef being officially "dead". Now, that's just social media, and the links I've seen don't appear to be the best, POV-wise. Is there any basis to this? (And I'm hoping not for obvious reasons). Have actual reputable sources covered this at all, and if so, is it worth mentioning? It's recentism, but I did come to the article to see if there was any non-hyperbolic info on this, other than the sections on pollution and bleaching. [[User:Freshacconci|<b><FONT COLOR="#000000">freshacconci</FONT></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci|<b><FONT COLOR="#B22222"> talk</FONT><FONT COLOR="#2F4F4F"> to me</FONT></b>]] 16:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Since this is outside my area of knowledge I'm not attempting to add this in any way. However, social media has been buzzing with declarations of the reef being officially "dead". Now, that's just social media, and the links I've seen don't appear to be the best, POV-wise. Is there any basis to this? (And I'm hoping not for obvious reasons). Have actual reputable sources covered this at all, and if so, is it worth mentioning? It's recentism, but I did come to the article to see if there was any non-hyperbolic info on this, other than the sections on pollution and bleaching. [[User:Freshacconci|<b><span style="color:#000000;">freshacconci</span></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci|<b><span style="color:#B22222;"> talk</span><span style="color:#2F4F4F;"> to me</span></b>]] 16:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
:Found my own answer, of [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scientists-take-on-great-barrier-reef-obituary_us_57fff8f1e4b0162c043b068f sorts]. Apparently, scientists are taking note of the social media reports and are not happy about the claims. Should this be included, somehow? It may be moving towards the point where it is part of the Reef's narrative. [[User:Freshacconci|<b><FONT COLOR="#000000">freshacconci</FONT></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci|<b><FONT COLOR="#B22222"> talk</FONT><FONT COLOR="#2F4F4F"> to me</FONT></b>]] 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
:Found my own answer, of [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/scientists-take-on-great-barrier-reef-obituary_us_57fff8f1e4b0162c043b068f sorts]. Apparently, scientists are taking note of the social media reports and are not happy about the claims. Should this be included, somehow? It may be moving towards the point where it is part of the Reef's narrative. [[User:Freshacconci|<b><span style="color:#000000;">freshacconci</span></b>]][[User talk:Freshacconci|<b><span style="color:#B22222;"> talk</span><span style="color:#2F4F4F;"> to me</span></b>]] 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
::I've seen this around as well - this page is locked to all but autoconfirmed, but I suggest adding the current-related tag since this has popped up throughout social media today. I added it in without much of a rationale (my bad), but I'll add it back in since this covers my concerns (the current related tag lets viewers know this information is changing and not necessarily reputable). [[User:Garchy|Garchy]] ([[User talk:Garchy|talk]]) 20:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
::I've seen this around as well - this page is locked to all but autoconfirmed, but I suggest adding the current-related tag since this has popped up throughout social media today. I added it in without much of a rationale (my bad), but I'll add it back in since this covers my concerns (the current related tag lets viewers know this information is changing and not necessarily reputable). [[User:Garchy|Garchy]] ([[User talk:Garchy|talk]]) 20:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


Line 443: Line 238:
== Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2018 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2018 ==


ΨἒἝἕἲἲἳῊᾺϊΪἝΨ[[Category:[[Category:<span class="plainlinks"><sub><noinclude><sup>aʊɔɪʊər{{IPAc-en|{{angle bracket|ʃdʒdʒtʃtʃtʃ}}}}</sup></noinclude></sub></span>]]]]{{edit semi-protected|Great Barrier Reef|answered=no}}
<code><nowiki>ΨἒἝἕἲἲἳῊᾺϊΪἝΨ[[Category:[[Category:<span class="plainlinks"><sub><noinclude><sup>aʊɔɪʊər{{IPAc-en|{{angle bracket|ʃdʒdʒtʃtʃtʃ}}}}</sup></noinclude></sub></span>]]]]</nowiki></code>
{{edit semi-protected|Great Barrier Reef|answered=yes}}
[[Special:Contributions/67.202.180.139|67.202.180.139]] ([[User talk:67.202.180.139|talk]]) 22:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/67.202.180.139|67.202.180.139]] ([[User talk:67.202.180.139|talk]]) 22:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Sakura Cartelet|<span style="color: fuchsia;">Sak</span><span style="color: red;">ura </span><span style="color: gold;">Cart</span><span style="color: cyan;">elet</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Sakura Cartelet|Talk]]</sup> 22:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

== External links modified (January 2018) ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on [[Great Barrier Reef]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/821769624|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911160512/http://www.naturebase.net/content/view/668/96/ to http://www.naturebase.net/content/view/668/96/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

== Missing information that contradicts global warming threat ==
The reef moves every year and where it is now used to be above ground.
The reef can recover quite easily from change. However there doesn't appear to be a contrary side of the article than of that to climate change.
There is even a separate article for climate change on the reef.
These are common to the reasons I don't use Wikipedia.
<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/great-barrier-reef-sixth-life-30-000-years-155408981.html}}</ref>
:::We'll miss you then. But you are omitting the fact that the same article says the reef may not recover from this. --[[User:Dmol|Dmol]] ([[User talk:Dmol|talk]]) 06:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
{{reflist talk}}

== Potential contradiction regarding effects of temperature. ==

There are many places in this article where there is discussion of the dire effects of increasing water temperatures on the Reef, and how the reef itself is in danger from them. That would appear to be totally at odds with this statement:

"In addition, approximately 400,000 years ago there was a particularly warm interglacial period with higher sea levels and a 4 °C (7 °F) water temperature change." So, the reef survived a 4°C increase then, but is in danger from a current change of less than half of that now?? Can someone explain this, please? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/124.191.164.198|124.191.164.198]] ([[User talk:124.191.164.198#top|talk]]) 08:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2019 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Great Barrier Reef|answered=yes}}
[[User:12abc 11|12abc 11]] ([[User talk:12abc 11|talk]]) 07:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
à
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Melmann|Melmann]] ([[User talk:Melmann|talk]]) 07:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

== Reef Master Guide Program ==

In 2019, the Great Barrier Reef Park Authority in relation with Association of Marine Park Tourism Operators and Tourism and Events Queensland created the Master Reef Guide program. Master Reef Guides were trained in a range of areas such as public speaking, enhancing visitor experience, and the power of interpretation. By providing up-to-date information on the Reef, sharing stories of the magical World Heritage Area, Master Reef Guided explain what visitor can do to make a difference. Those guides would be present great barrier reef tour operators and provide a way for visitors and locals to understand both the challenges and opportunities for the Great Barrier Reef.


[[User:Steph44980|Steph44980]] ([[User talk:Steph44980|talk]]) 14:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)<ref>http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/our-partners/master-reef-guides</ref>

== third mass [[Coral bleaching|bleaching]] event in five years, add here or ... ? ==

*https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/07/australia/great-barrier-reef-bleaching-2020-intl-hnk/index.html
*https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/04/06/great-barrier-reef-coral-bleaching/
*https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/07/man-dies-after-being-bitten-by-a-shark-near-great-barrier-reef
*https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/world/australia/great-barrier-reefs-bleaching-dying.html
[[User:X1\|X1\]] ([[User talk:X1\|talk]]) 10:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

===Outdated information on mass coral bleaching events of the GBR===
Please update the information on mass bleaching events of the reefs in the lead and the section "Environmental threats".

I have added this info to [[2020 in science]]:

<blockquote>
*Scientists report the results of a survey of the [[Great Barrier Reef]]. For the first time, all its three regions experienced [[coral bleaching|severe bleaching]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Thiessen |first1=Tamara |title=Great Barrier Reef Coral Bleaching: Climate Change Tragedy For World Natural Wonder |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/tamarathiessen/2020/04/07/great-barrier-reef-coral-bleaching-climate-change-tragedy/ |accessdate=12 May 2020 |work=Forbes |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Climate change triggers Great Barrier Reef bleaching – ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies |url=https://www.coralcoe.org.au/media-releases/climate-change-triggers-great-barrier-reef-bleaching |website=www.coralcoe.org.au |accessdate=12 May 2020}}</ref> On March 25 – day three of the nine-day survey – they reported its third mass bleaching event within five years.<ref>{{cite news |title=Great Barrier Reef suffers third mass coral bleaching event in five years |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/25/great-barrier-reef-suffers-third-mass-coral-bleaching-event-in-five-years |accessdate=12 May 2020 |work=the Guardian |date=25 March 2020 |language=en}}</ref>
</blockquote>

--[[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|talk]]) 15:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2020 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Great Barrier Reef|answered=yes}}
One of Australia’s most remarkable natural gifts, the Great Barrier Reef is blessed with the breathtaking beauty of the world’s largest coral reef. The reef contains an abundance of marine life and comprises of over 3000 individual reef systems and coral cays and literally hundreds of picturesque tropical islands with some of the worlds most beautiful sun-soaked, golden beaches.
Because of its natural beauty, the Great Barrier Reef has become one of the worlds most sought after tourist destinations.A visitor to the Great Barrier Reef can enjoy many experiences including snorkelling, scuba diving, aircraft or helicopter tours, bare boats (self-sail), glass-bottomed boat viewing, semi-submersibles and educational trips, cruise ship tours, whale watching and swimming with dolphins [[User:Lia 199712|Lia 199712]] ([[User talk:Lia 199712|talk]]) 02:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:LittlePuppers|LittlePuppers]] ([[User talk:LittlePuppers|talk]]) 02:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}
== Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2020 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Great Barrier Reef|answered=yes}}
In the second paragraph (OR by adding this to a new paragraph after the second paragraph) add the following:

In December 2020 researchers based at the Great Barrier Reef have discovered that a new method of preservation embracing in vitro fertilization technology had shown promise in reef restoration. The method involves collection of coral egg and sperm during the yearly spawn at the reef, which are then used in specially designed enclosures to encourage the growth of coral larvae. Following a seven day gestation period the larvae are dispersed to badly damaged areas of the reef needing fresh live coral.<ref name="CoralIVF">{{cite news |last1=Ball |first1=Sam |title=‘Coral IVF’: A way to save the Great Barrier Reef? |url=https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20201214-coral-ivf-a-way-to-save-the-great-barrier-reef |access-date=27 December 2020 |publisher=France24}}</ref> [[User:Zenzes|Zenzes]] ([[User talk:Zenzes|talk]]) 12:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
:It appears to me that this research is still at its primary stages and has not yet been put into widespread use, I think we should wait until this has had more impact before we include it ([[WP:DUE]]). – '''[[User:Þjarkur|Thjarkur]]''' [[User talk:Þjarkur|(talk)]] 22:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

July 2021 observations from Australian Government scientists are now available https://www.aims.gov.au/reef-monitoring/gbr-condition-summary-2020-2021 and indicate that coral cover levels have returned to 1985 levels. Suggest this article should reflect that ?? [[User:Mrdavenport|Mrdavenport]] ([[User talk:Mrdavenport|talk]]) 19:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

== Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef ==

[[Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef]] has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Chidgk1|Chidgk1]] ([[User talk:Chidgk1|talk]]) 15:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

== I did some good vandalism. ==

Can you see my vandalism?-DamianLewis21 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Damianlewis21|Damianlewis21]] ([[User talk:Damianlewis21#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Damianlewis21|contribs]]) 20:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2022 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Great Barrier Reef|answered=yes}}
[[Special:Contributions/156.1.40.61|156.1.40.61]] ([[User talk:156.1.40.61|talk]]) 20:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC) i want to help the website bc people dont damege the info
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 20:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UCSD/Introduction_to_Policy_Analysis_(Spring) | assignments = [[User:Alytras|Alytras]] | start_date = 2022-03-28 | end_date = 2022-05-30 }}
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Jun3038|Jun3038]] ([[User talk:Jun3038|talk]]) 09:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)</span>
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Jun3038|Jun3038]] ([[User talk:Jun3038|talk]]) 09:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)</span>

== Genetics ==

There is around 360 species of coral in The Great Barrier Reef. [[User:Epsr|Epsr]] ([[User talk:Epsr|talk]]) 06:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

== Measurements ==

"The Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest coral reef system[1][2] composed of over 2,900 individual reefs[3] and 900 islands stretching for over 2,300 kilometres (1,400 mi) over an area of approximately 344,400 square kilometres (133,000 sq mi).[4][5] The reef is located in the Coral Sea, off the coast of Queensland, Australia, separated from the coast by a channel 100 miles wide in places and over 200 feet deep" - would it make sense to put the measurement of the channel in the article in kilometers, seeing as how the previous figures up til this point have been in that? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.71.173.206|76.71.173.206]] ([[User talk:76.71.173.206#top|talk]]) 16:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Yes, that reference to feet and miles seems very odd. Australia uses the metric system and as a diver here, I have never used miles or feet to describe the coral marine habitat. Can this please be fixed ASAP as it does not match the rest of the article? [[User:Rgesthuizen|Rgesthuizen]] ([[User talk:Rgesthuizen|talk]]) 22:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

==Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY2==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_at_Buffalo/SSC199_TY2_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:Kurioverrice|Kurioverrice]] | start_date = 2022-11-07 | end_date = 2022-12-16 }}

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Kurioverrice|Kurioverrice]] ([[User talk:Kurioverrice|talk]]) 00:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)</span>

== Area ==

Why is the area put in hectares? It’s completely unsuitable for its size (it’s massive) and context (Australians don’t use hectares and people who do only use it for farming). [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7E:3AA7:8D00:A120:8D25:D51C:CBCA|2A02:C7E:3AA7:8D00:A120:8D25:D51C:CBCA]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7E:3AA7:8D00:A120:8D25:D51C:CBCA|talk]]) 19:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

== Name ==
Why is this feature called the Great Barrier Reef instead of the Great Barrier Reefs? It comprises more than one [[coral reef]]. [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:9100:2C01:A4CB:C8E9:14BE:3CCB|2001:8003:9100:2C01:A4CB:C8E9:14BE:3CCB]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:9100:2C01:A4CB:C8E9:14BE:3CCB|talk]]) 16:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

== Contradiction in article - first European to sight the GBR ==

The "Discover" and naming section mentions James Cook being the first European to sight the GBR in 1770, but the "Human use" section states that Louis de Bougainville found the reef in 1768 but did not claim it. One of these statements must be off, I believe. Either Louis did not "sight" the GBR in 1768, or James wasn't the first European to sight it. [[User:William Pettersson|William Pettersson]] ([[User talk:William Pettersson|talk]]) 09:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

:Well, the source provided says Bougainville saw a line of surf in the ocean and, having no reason to investigate that area any further and being short of food, he sailed away. So on the basis of that source , I think the statement he did not "claim" it is a bit of an overreach. It's not clear if he knew it was a reef or he simply decided to navigate away from a possibly dangerous situation. Even if he had known it was a reef, were the European powers of the day in the habit of claiming reefs as territory? They claimed islands certainly but is there any history of claiming reefs? Did reefs have economic or strategic value? And even if he encountered a section of reef, did he realise the extent of it in terms of the Great Barrier Reef as we know it today? It would be interesting to read Bougainville's report of events to know what he saw, what he thought it was, how extensive he thought it was, and whether he gave any thought to claiming it. As the current source has it, I would say that Bougainville avoided sailing too close to a reef that is now regarded as part of the Great Barrier Reef. And I have no idea how one decides if a particular section of reef is or isn't part of a large reef system. Whereas Cook who was sailing much closer to the Australian coast probably did observe (and try to avoid) quite a lot of reef along his journey north. He probably had a much greater awareness of there being extensive reefs in the area. Yet according to [[Possession Island (Queensland)]],
:"I now once more hoisted English Coulers and in the Name of His Majesty [[George III of the United Kingdom|King George the Third]] took possession of the whole Eastern Coast... by the name [[New South Wales]], together with all the Bays, Harbours Rivers and Islands situate upon the said coast".<ref>{{cite book |last=Cook |first=James |title=Journal of HMS Endeavour, 1769–1771 |publisher=National Library of Australia, Manuscripts Collection, MS 1, 22 August 1770}}</ref>
:So Cook didn't specifically claim the reef either. So I think I will rewrite the article to get rid of this "did not claim". [[User:Kerry Raymond|Kerry]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond|talk]]) 03:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
::Also, the source describes it as Bougainville Reef at about the latitude of Cooktown, which is a problem as [https://placenames.fsdf.org.au/ according to the Australian Govt] bougainville Reef is in WA. So not part of the Great Barrier Reef at all? [[User:Kerry Raymond|Kerry]] ([[User talk:Kerry Raymond|talk]]) 03:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:51, 1 December 2024

Former good articleGreat Barrier Reef was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 6, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 22, 2006WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
March 31, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 5, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
April 18, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 11, 2004, June 11, 2005, June 11, 2006, June 11, 2007, June 11, 2008, June 11, 2009, and June 11, 2010.
Current status: Delisted good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 22 external links on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2016

[edit]

Add semi lock. 122.62.45.15 (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Majora (talk) 23:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Death" of the Great Barrier Reef

[edit]

Since this is outside my area of knowledge I'm not attempting to add this in any way. However, social media has been buzzing with declarations of the reef being officially "dead". Now, that's just social media, and the links I've seen don't appear to be the best, POV-wise. Is there any basis to this? (And I'm hoping not for obvious reasons). Have actual reputable sources covered this at all, and if so, is it worth mentioning? It's recentism, but I did come to the article to see if there was any non-hyperbolic info on this, other than the sections on pollution and bleaching. freshacconci talk to me 16:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Found my own answer, of sorts. Apparently, scientists are taking note of the social media reports and are not happy about the claims. Should this be included, somehow? It may be moving towards the point where it is part of the Reef's narrative. freshacconci talk to me 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen this around as well - this page is locked to all but autoconfirmed, but I suggest adding the current-related tag since this has popped up throughout social media today. I added it in without much of a rationale (my bad), but I'll add it back in since this covers my concerns (the current related tag lets viewers know this information is changing and not necessarily reputable). Garchy (talk) 20:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great Barrier Reef

[edit]

The Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest coral reef system[1][2] composed of over 2,900 individual reefs[3] and 900 islands stretching for over 2,300 kilometres (1,400 mi) over an area of approximately 344,400 square kilometres (133,000 sq mi).[4][5] The reef is located in the Coral Sea, off the coast of Queensland, Australia.

The Great Barrier Reef can be seen from outer space and is the world's biggest single structure made by living organisms.[6] This reef structure is composed of and built by billions of tiny organisms, known as coral polyps.[7] It supports a wide diversity of life and was selected as a World Heritage Site in 1981.[1][2] CNN labelled it one of the seven natural wonders of the world.[8] The Queensland National Trust named it a state icon of Queensland.[9]

A large part of the reef is protected by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, which helps to limit the impact of human use, such as fishing and tourism. Other environmental pressures on the reef and its ecosystem include runoff, climate change accompanied by mass coral bleaching, and cyclic population outbreaks of the crown-of-thorns starfish. According to a study published in October 2012 by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the reef has lost more than half its coral cover since 1985. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8085:3040:680:4430:CE5C:55EC:3CCD (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Individual reassessment

[edit]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Great Barrier Reef/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

There has been a request on WP:GAR to reassess this article since 2015. Looks like adding some references is the biggest thing that needs to occur; I will identify everything during the reassessment, which will be occurring over the next week. Kees08 (Talk) 19:16, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

[edit]
  • Rephrase:
    • "an event that the authors put down to the effects of global climate change."

Images

[edit]
  • [[File:Part of Great Barrier Reef from Helecopter.JPG]]
    • I requested a move, so none of you have to deal with that (helicopter is spelled wrong)
  • [[File:GreatBarrierReef-EO.JPG]]
    • Please replace with an extracted image from [[File:GreatBarrierReef-PIA03401.jpg]]. The current image says the image is 'probably' this image, but it would be better to properly extract from the source image.
  • [[File:Great Barrier Reef (aerial view).JPG]]
    • Can we get this transferred to Commons? Not required for GA, this is just extra credit
  • [[File:GBReef_TempChlorophyll_200602.jpg]]
    • Source is a redirect, needs to work
Added archive. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The rest of the images seem to be fine (captions etc)

Citations

[edit]
  • Does not matter for GA, but if the statements are not controversial (like the size of the reef), the citations can just be in the article instead of the intro.
  • The management section needs additional citations, I can provide specifics if need be
  • Address the citation needed and unreliable source tags
  • Expand citations to include at least publisher and access date

I am going to wait on assessing the rest of the article until these have been addressed. Kees08 (Talk) 20:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kees08: Just a friendly reminder that this is still open. AIRcorn (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Hanif Al Husaini: Do you have any interest to work on addressing the GAR comments? Otherwise I will be demoting the article in the near future. Thanks! Kees08 (Talk) 00:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kees08: Hanif has been editing since your reminder so it is probably safe to assume they have lost interest. AIRcorn (talk) 00:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you need a hand to close this let me know and I will help how I can. AIRcorn (talk) 00:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I closed it just now. Would be great if we had an assisted way to do that someday, a lot of pages to edit! Kees08 (Talk) 11:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kees08: You might want to add your support/comments here. AIRcorn (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2018

[edit]

ΨἒἝἕἲἲἳῊᾺϊΪἝΨ[[Category:[[Category:<span class="plainlinks"><sub><noinclude><sup>aʊɔɪʊər{{IPAc-en|{{angle bracket|ʃdʒdʒtʃtʃtʃ}}}}</sup></noinclude></sub></span>]]]]

67.202.180.139 (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sakura CarteletTalk 22:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Barrier Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information that contradicts global warming threat

[edit]

The reef moves every year and where it is now used to be above ground. The reef can recover quite easily from change. However there doesn't appear to be a contrary side of the article than of that to climate change. There is even a separate article for climate change on the reef. These are common to the reasons I don't use Wikipedia. [1]

We'll miss you then. But you are omitting the fact that the same article says the reef may not recover from this. --Dmol (talk) 06:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.yahoo.com/news/great-barrier-reef-sixth-life-30-000-years-155408981.html. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Potential contradiction regarding effects of temperature.

[edit]

There are many places in this article where there is discussion of the dire effects of increasing water temperatures on the Reef, and how the reef itself is in danger from them. That would appear to be totally at odds with this statement:

"In addition, approximately 400,000 years ago there was a particularly warm interglacial period with higher sea levels and a 4 °C (7 °F) water temperature change." So, the reef survived a 4°C increase then, but is in danger from a current change of less than half of that now?? Can someone explain this, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.191.164.198 (talk) 08:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2019

[edit]
12abc 11 (talk) 07:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

à

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Melmann (talk) 07:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reef Master Guide Program

[edit]

In 2019, the Great Barrier Reef Park Authority in relation with Association of Marine Park Tourism Operators and Tourism and Events Queensland created the Master Reef Guide program. Master Reef Guides were trained in a range of areas such as public speaking, enhancing visitor experience, and the power of interpretation. By providing up-to-date information on the Reef, sharing stories of the magical World Heritage Area, Master Reef Guided explain what visitor can do to make a difference. Those guides would be present great barrier reef tour operators and provide a way for visitors and locals to understand both the challenges and opportunities for the Great Barrier Reef.


Steph44980 (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[1][reply]

third mass bleaching event in five years, add here or ... ?

[edit]

X1\ (talk) 10:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated information on mass coral bleaching events of the GBR

[edit]

Please update the information on mass bleaching events of the reefs in the lead and the section "Environmental threats".

I have added this info to 2020 in science:

  • Scientists report the results of a survey of the Great Barrier Reef. For the first time, all its three regions experienced severe bleaching.[2][3] On March 25 – day three of the nine-day survey – they reported its third mass bleaching event within five years.[4]

--Prototyperspective (talk) 15:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2020

[edit]

One of Australia’s most remarkable natural gifts, the Great Barrier Reef is blessed with the breathtaking beauty of the world’s largest coral reef. The reef contains an abundance of marine life and comprises of over 3000 individual reef systems and coral cays and literally hundreds of picturesque tropical islands with some of the worlds most beautiful sun-soaked, golden beaches. Because of its natural beauty, the Great Barrier Reef has become one of the worlds most sought after tourist destinations.A visitor to the Great Barrier Reef can enjoy many experiences including snorkelling, scuba diving, aircraft or helicopter tours, bare boats (self-sail), glass-bottomed boat viewing, semi-submersibles and educational trips, cruise ship tours, whale watching and swimming with dolphins Lia 199712 (talk) 02:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. LittlePuppers (talk) 02:38, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2020

[edit]

In the second paragraph (OR by adding this to a new paragraph after the second paragraph) add the following:

In December 2020 researchers based at the Great Barrier Reef have discovered that a new method of preservation embracing in vitro fertilization technology had shown promise in reef restoration. The method involves collection of coral egg and sperm during the yearly spawn at the reef, which are then used in specially designed enclosures to encourage the growth of coral larvae. Following a seven day gestation period the larvae are dispersed to badly damaged areas of the reef needing fresh live coral.[1] Zenzes (talk) 12:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Ball, Sam. "'Coral IVF': A way to save the Great Barrier Reef?". France24. Retrieved 27 December 2020.
It appears to me that this research is still at its primary stages and has not yet been put into widespread use, I think we should wait until this has had more impact before we include it (WP:DUE). – Thjarkur (talk) 22:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 observations from Australian Government scientists are now available https://www.aims.gov.au/reef-monitoring/gbr-condition-summary-2020-2021 and indicate that coral cover levels have returned to 1985 levels. Suggest this article should reflect that ?? Mrdavenport (talk) 19:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef

[edit]

Environmental threats to the Great Barrier Reef has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did some good vandalism.

[edit]

Can you see my vandalism?-DamianLewis21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damianlewis21 (talkcontribs) 20:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2022

[edit]
156.1.40.61 (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2022 (UTC) i want to help the website bc people dont damege the info[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alytras (article contribs). — Assignment last updated by Jun3038 (talk) 09:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC) — Assignment last updated by Jun3038 (talk) 09:39, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genetics

[edit]

There is around 360 species of coral in The Great Barrier Reef. Epsr (talk) 06:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Measurements

[edit]

"The Great Barrier Reef is the world's largest coral reef system[1][2] composed of over 2,900 individual reefs[3] and 900 islands stretching for over 2,300 kilometres (1,400 mi) over an area of approximately 344,400 square kilometres (133,000 sq mi).[4][5] The reef is located in the Coral Sea, off the coast of Queensland, Australia, separated from the coast by a channel 100 miles wide in places and over 200 feet deep" - would it make sense to put the measurement of the channel in the article in kilometers, seeing as how the previous figures up til this point have been in that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.71.173.206 (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that reference to feet and miles seems very odd. Australia uses the metric system and as a diver here, I have never used miles or feet to describe the coral marine habitat. Can this please be fixed ASAP as it does not match the rest of the article? Rgesthuizen (talk) 22:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY2

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 November 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kurioverrice (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kurioverrice (talk) 00:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Area

[edit]

Why is the area put in hectares? It’s completely unsuitable for its size (it’s massive) and context (Australians don’t use hectares and people who do only use it for farming). 2A02:C7E:3AA7:8D00:A120:8D25:D51C:CBCA (talk) 19:56, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Why is this feature called the Great Barrier Reef instead of the Great Barrier Reefs? It comprises more than one coral reef. 2001:8003:9100:2C01:A4CB:C8E9:14BE:3CCB (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction in article - first European to sight the GBR

[edit]

The "Discover" and naming section mentions James Cook being the first European to sight the GBR in 1770, but the "Human use" section states that Louis de Bougainville found the reef in 1768 but did not claim it. One of these statements must be off, I believe. Either Louis did not "sight" the GBR in 1768, or James wasn't the first European to sight it. William Pettersson (talk) 09:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the source provided says Bougainville saw a line of surf in the ocean and, having no reason to investigate that area any further and being short of food, he sailed away. So on the basis of that source , I think the statement he did not "claim" it is a bit of an overreach. It's not clear if he knew it was a reef or he simply decided to navigate away from a possibly dangerous situation. Even if he had known it was a reef, were the European powers of the day in the habit of claiming reefs as territory? They claimed islands certainly but is there any history of claiming reefs? Did reefs have economic or strategic value? And even if he encountered a section of reef, did he realise the extent of it in terms of the Great Barrier Reef as we know it today? It would be interesting to read Bougainville's report of events to know what he saw, what he thought it was, how extensive he thought it was, and whether he gave any thought to claiming it. As the current source has it, I would say that Bougainville avoided sailing too close to a reef that is now regarded as part of the Great Barrier Reef. And I have no idea how one decides if a particular section of reef is or isn't part of a large reef system. Whereas Cook who was sailing much closer to the Australian coast probably did observe (and try to avoid) quite a lot of reef along his journey north. He probably had a much greater awareness of there being extensive reefs in the area. Yet according to Possession Island (Queensland),
"I now once more hoisted English Coulers and in the Name of His Majesty King George the Third took possession of the whole Eastern Coast... by the name New South Wales, together with all the Bays, Harbours Rivers and Islands situate upon the said coast".[1]
So Cook didn't specifically claim the reef either. So I think I will rewrite the article to get rid of this "did not claim". Kerry (talk) 03:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the source describes it as Bougainville Reef at about the latitude of Cooktown, which is a problem as according to the Australian Govt bougainville Reef is in WA. So not part of the Great Barrier Reef at all? Kerry (talk) 03:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Cook, James. Journal of HMS Endeavour, 1769–1771. National Library of Australia, Manuscripts Collection, MS 1, 22 August 1770.