LGBTQ rights in Zambia: Difference between revisions
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m Update LGBTQ portal (WP:AWB/Tasks), replaced: LGBT → LGBTQ |
m Merging Category:LGBTQ rights in Africa by country to Category:LGBTQ rights by country and Category:LGBTQ rights in Africa per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 22#Category:LGBTQ by continent and country |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and |
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in Zambia face significant challenges not experienced by non-[[LGBTQ]] residents.<ref>{{cite web |title=Zambia |url=https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/zambia/ |website=Human Dignity Trust |access-date=25 August 2023}}</ref> Same-sex sexual activity is illegal for both men and women in [[Zambia]].<ref name="Numwa">{{cite web |
||
|url = http://www.mask.org.za/index.php?page=zambia |
|url = http://www.mask.org.za/index.php?page=zambia |
||
|title = Zambia |
|title = Zambia |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|url-status = dead |
|url-status = dead |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
Formerly a colony of the [[British Empire]], Zambia inherited the laws and legal system of its colonial occupiers upon independence in 1964. Laws concerning homosexuality have largely remained unchanged since then, and homosexuality is covered by [[sodomy law]]s that also proscribe [[bestiality]].<ref name="Numwa"/> Social attitudes toward |
Formerly a colony of the [[British Empire]], Zambia inherited the laws and legal system of its colonial occupiers upon independence in 1964. Laws concerning homosexuality have largely remained unchanged since then, and homosexuality is covered by [[sodomy law]]s that also proscribe [[bestiality]].<ref name="Numwa"/> Social attitudes toward LGBTQ people are mostly negative and coloured by perceptions that homosexuality is immoral and a form of [[insanity]].<ref name="Numwa"/> However, in recent years, younger generations are beginning to show positive and open minded attitudes towards their LGBTQ peers. |
||
LGBTQ persons are subjected to human rights violations by police and authorities. Subject to arbitrary arrest and detentions, they suffer violence and abuse in custody. Police are reported to threaten and extort LGBTQ persons. Those prosecuted for same-sex conduct are subjected to the use of forced anal examinations for evidence-gathering purposes. Such procedures are invasive and traumatic and are widely condemned by medical authorities and human rights groups; they are discredited for the purpose of providing any evidence of same-sex sexual activity. |
|||
Other serious societal discrimination and abuse is directed towards |
Other serious societal discrimination and abuse is directed towards LGBTQ persons. They may be targeted threats, [[stalking]], [[vandalism]], [[violence]], and other [[hate crimes]], including [[murder]]s. LGBTQ people routinely face community harassment and discrimination, with little recourse to assistance from police or government. |
||
In recent years, the onset of the internet has led to more positive support and opinions towards the |
In recent years, the onset of the internet has led to more positive support and opinions towards the LGBTQ community. The fast digitization of the country has led to exposure to more people and stories from different facets of life. This in turn has led to more open minded attitudes amongst the growing youth reducing discrimination and prejudice among people of different communities. |
||
==Laws== |
==Laws== |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
==Restrictions on advocacy== |
==Restrictions on advocacy== |
||
The [[government of Zambia|Zambian government]] does not permit advocacy of |
The [[government of Zambia|Zambian government]] does not permit advocacy of LGBTQ rights;<ref name="Fabeni"/> despite this, freedom of expression has been affirmed by the courts.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2015/08/meerkotter-reid-no-fault|title=Africa Ruling Move LGBT Rights Forward|last=Reid & Meerkotter|first=G. & A.|date=4 August 2015|website=Jurist|access-date=20 December 2019}}</ref> Nevertheless, in their 2021 report, the bare conclusion of the U.S. Department of State was: "Freedom of expression or peaceful assembly on LGBTQI+ matters remained nonexistent."<ref name="2021-22 US State"/> |
||
In 1998, in a statement to the [[National Assembly of Zambia]], [[Vice President of Zambia|Vice President]] [[Christon Tembo]] called for the arrest of individuals who promote gay rights, citing a need to "protect public morality".<ref name="Fabeni"/> [[List of Presidents of Zambia|President]] [[Frederick Chiluba]] described homosexuality as "unbiblical" and "against human nature".<ref> |
In 1998, in a statement to the [[National Assembly of Zambia]], [[Vice President of Zambia|Vice President]] [[Christon Tembo]] called for the arrest of individuals who promote gay rights, citing a need to "protect public morality".<ref name="Fabeni"/> [[List of Presidents of Zambia|President]] [[Frederick Chiluba]] described homosexuality as "unbiblical" and "against human nature".<ref> |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| work = World Report 1999 |
| work = World Report 1999 |
||
| publisher = [[Human Rights Watch]] |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080723053605/http://www.hrw.org/worldreport99/special/gay.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 23 July 2008}}</ref> |
| publisher = [[Human Rights Watch]] |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080723053605/http://www.hrw.org/worldreport99/special/gay.html <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = 23 July 2008}}</ref> |
||
Later, Home Affairs Minister [[Peter Machungwa]] ordered the arrest of any individual or group attempting to formally register a gay rights advocacy group. [[Herbert Nyendwa]], the Registrar of Societies, stated that he would refuse to register any |
Later, Home Affairs Minister [[Peter Machungwa]] ordered the arrest of any individual or group attempting to formally register a gay rights advocacy group. [[Herbert Nyendwa]], the Registrar of Societies, stated that he would refuse to register any LGBTQ organisation or [[civil society|civic group]].<ref name="Fabeni"/> |
||
===''The People v. Paul Kasonkomona''=== |
===''The People v. Paul Kasonkomona''=== |
||
The restrictions on advocating for |
The restrictions on advocating for LGBTQ rights were challenged in [[Judiciary of Zambia|Zambia's courts]] in 2013, after a human rights activist appeared on TV talk show program. During the program, the activist called for the decriminalization of homosexuality in Zambia,<ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/09/zambian-gay-rights-activist-arrested|title=Zambian gay rights activist arrested|last=Smith|first=D.|date=9 April 2013|work=The Guardian|access-date=19 December 2019}}</ref> the recognition of rights for sexual minorities,<ref name=":0" /> and HIV's spread to be combated among sexual minority groups.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web|url=https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/case-of-paul-kasonkomona/|title=The people v. Kasonkomona|date=n.d.|website=Columbia Global Freedom of Expression|access-date=19 December 2019}}</ref> After the program, the activist was stopped by police, held in jail overnight, and accused of inciting the public to take part in indecent activities.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":3" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://mg.co.za/article/2013-09-12-amnesty-calls-for-release-of-zambias-first-arrested-gay-couple|title=Amnesty calls for release of Zambia's first arrested gay couple|date=12 September 2013|work=Mail and Guardian|access-date=19 December 2019}}</ref> The activist was later charged with "idle and disorderly conduct under Section 178(g) of the Penal Code, of the Laws of Zambia".<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite book|chapter=Chapter Six: Gender, Sexuality, Women and Discrimination—The People v. Paul Kasonkomona [2015] HPA/53/2014 Zambia, High Court|url=https://www.law.utoronto.ca/programs-centres/programs/irshl-reproductive-and-sexual-health-law/irshl-legal-grounds-updates/legal |chapter-url=https://www.law.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/documents/reprohealth/lg3-ch6-gender-sexuality-women-discrimination.pdf|volume=III|series=Legal Grounds |title=Reproductive and Sexual Rights in Sub-saharan African courts|publisher=Pretoria University Law Press|date=2017|isbn=978-1-920538-63-7|location=Pretoria|pages=155–157}} {{Free access}}</ref> |
||
The activist challenged the charges in court by questioning three definitions to which he was charged: (1) "soliciting", (2) "public space", and (3) "immoral purposes".<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> In the first level of court, the Magistrate Court, the judge ruled in favour of the activist and stated the activist's statements reflected an act of [[Freedom of speech|freedom of expression]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /> The government challenged the decision. |
The activist challenged the charges in court by questioning three definitions to which he was charged: (1) "soliciting", (2) "public space", and (3) "immoral purposes".<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> In the first level of court, the Magistrate Court, the judge ruled in favour of the activist and stated the activist's statements reflected an act of [[Freedom of speech|freedom of expression]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /> The government challenged the decision. |
||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
== Legal action and reform == |
== Legal action and reform == |
||
Although Zambia has maintained a strict stance against any form of |
Although Zambia has maintained a strict stance against any form of LGBTQ activity, there have been a number of efforts by the UN to get Zambia to change its policies and law regarding same-sex activity. These efforts have been largely in vain as Zambia sustained its policies. |
||
Zambian legal policies regarding same-sex activity have effectively bred a national environment of homophobia which has made it to where that the justice system severely disadvantages |
Zambian legal policies regarding same-sex activity have effectively bred a national environment of homophobia which has made it to where that the justice system severely disadvantages LGBTQ identifying individuals. The justice system fails to recognize and protect the lives of LGBTQ citizens which has in effect opened the window for citizen-based militia activity against LGBTQ individuals. The US Department of State's 2010 report on human rights in Zambia states that:<ref name="2010 US State"/>{{bq|...the government enforces law that criminalizes homosexual conduct and did not respond to societal discrimination{{nbsp}}... according to LGBT advocacy groups, societal violence occurred, as did societal discrimination in employment, housing, and access to education or health care{{nbsp}}... LGBT groups reported frequent attacks and discrimination in the neighborhoods in which they operated. Activists reported regular harassment, including threats via text message and e-mail, vandalism, stalking, and outright violence.}} In April 2013, [[Paul Kasonkomona]], a notable Zambian LGBTQ activist, was arrested for speaking about LBGT and HIV related issues on a local TV station.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/2015/05/15/news-release-zambia-high-court-confirms-acquittal-of-hiv-activist-paul-kasonkomona/|title=NEWS RELEASE: ZAMBIA HIGH COURT CONFIRMS ACQUITTAL OF HIV ACTIVIST, PAUL KASONKOMONA – Southern Africa Litigation Centre|language=en-ZA|access-date=2020-03-26}}</ref> Kasonkomona was charged with the crime of "soliciting in a public place for immoral purpose." Also in 2013, two gay-identifying men were beaten outside of a nightclub after being found in a "compromising position". They decided against pressing charges out of the fear of being jailed themselves. |
||
In May 2014, citizens of the Marapodi area of [[Lusaka]] apprehended two women who were suspected lesbians. They captured the women, brought them to the local police station, and demanded their arrest.<ref>{{cite report |author1=((Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor)) |title=Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015: Zambia |url=http://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm?year=2015&dlid=252743|access-date=2020-03-26 |website=US Department of State |date=2016}}</ref> |
In May 2014, citizens of the Marapodi area of [[Lusaka]] apprehended two women who were suspected lesbians. They captured the women, brought them to the local police station, and demanded their arrest.<ref>{{cite report |author1=((Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor)) |title=Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015: Zambia |url=http://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm?year=2015&dlid=252743|access-date=2020-03-26 |website=US Department of State |date=2016}}</ref> |
||
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
In January 2015, an openly gay man was attacked by a mob which reportedly included three police officers.<ref name="76 crimes 2014">{{cite web |title=Zambia's growing intolerance towards LGBTI persons|language=en-US|access-date=2020-03-26 |url=https://76crimes.com/2014/01/31/zambias-growing-intolerance-towards-lgbti-persons/ |website=Erasing 76 Crimes |date=31 January 2014}}</ref> |
In January 2015, an openly gay man was attacked by a mob which reportedly included three police officers.<ref name="76 crimes 2014">{{cite web |title=Zambia's growing intolerance towards LGBTI persons|language=en-US|access-date=2020-03-26 |url=https://76crimes.com/2014/01/31/zambias-growing-intolerance-towards-lgbti-persons/ |website=Erasing 76 Crimes |date=31 January 2014}}</ref> |
||
Zambia has abstained from/denied a number of reform efforts. In 2011, Zambia was one of three countries to abstain from a call from the Human Rights Council to prepare a report on the rights of its |
Zambia has abstained from/denied a number of reform efforts. In 2011, Zambia was one of three countries to abstain from a call from the Human Rights Council to prepare a report on the rights of its LGBTQ citizens.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/RES/17/19|title=Human Rights Documents|website=ap.ohchr.org|access-date=2020-03-26}}</ref> In a 2012 UPR review, Zambia rejected recommendations to repeal laws criminalizing same-sex relations. This followed a similar recommendation by the UPR in its 2008 review. The Zambian delegation provided the following in defense of their rejections:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/100/05/PDF/G1310005.pdf?OpenElement|title=ODS HOME PAGE|website=documents-dds-ny.un.org|access-date=2020-03-26}}</ref><blockquote>the Constitution making process will give the people the opportunity to determine whether specific rights for LGBTQ persons should be enshrined in the Constitution. The Government was determined not to prescribe to the Zambian people those rights that the Constitution should contain, but to let them make such a determination.</blockquote>However, in its 2018 review, Zambia noted the recommendations to decriminalize same-sex relations.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G18/005/26/PDF/G1800526.pdf?OpenElement|title=ODS HOME PAGE|website=documents-dds-ny.un.org|access-date=2020-03-26}}</ref> Aside from this, no further actions have been made thus far. |
||
==Recognition of same-sex relationships== |
==Recognition of same-sex relationships== |
||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
A 2010 survey revealed that only 2 percent of Zambians find homosexuality to be morally acceptable, nine points below the figure recorded in Uganda (11 percent acceptance).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2013/06/04/the-global-divide-on-homosexuality/ |title=The Global Divide on Homosexuality |
A 2010 survey revealed that only 2 percent of Zambians find homosexuality to be morally acceptable, nine points below the figure recorded in Uganda (11 percent acceptance).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2013/06/04/the-global-divide-on-homosexuality/ |title=The Global Divide on Homosexuality |
||
|date=4 June 2013 |
|||
|publisher= Pew Research Center |access-date=11 April 2014 }}</ref> In 2013, [[Christine Kaseba]], the wife of former [[President of Zambia|President]] [[Michael Sata]], said that "silence around issues of men who have sex with men should be stopped and no one should be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation."<ref>{{cite web|author=Jean Ann Esselink |url=http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/first-lady-of-zambia-stuns-the-continent-by-calling-for-an-end-to-homophobia/news/2013/11/08/78342 |title=Zambia's First Lady Stuns Africa By Calling for an End To Homophobia |website=The New Civil Rights Movement |date=8 November 2013 |access-date=11 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111033543/http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/first-lady-of-zambia-stuns-the-continent-by-calling-for-an-end-to-homophobia/news/2013/11/08/78342#.WstT6tYh2kA |archive-date=11 November 2013}}</ref> |
|publisher= Pew Research Center |access-date=11 April 2014 }}</ref> In 2013, [[Christine Kaseba]], the wife of former [[President of Zambia|President]] [[Michael Sata]], said that "silence around issues of men who have sex with men should be stopped and no one should be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation."<ref>{{cite web|author=Jean Ann Esselink |url=http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/first-lady-of-zambia-stuns-the-continent-by-calling-for-an-end-to-homophobia/news/2013/11/08/78342 |title=Zambia's First Lady Stuns Africa By Calling for an End To Homophobia |website=The New Civil Rights Movement |date=8 November 2013 |access-date=11 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111033543/http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/first-lady-of-zambia-stuns-the-continent-by-calling-for-an-end-to-homophobia/news/2013/11/08/78342#.WstT6tYh2kA |archive-date=11 November 2013}}</ref> |
||
===Harassment and violence=== |
===Harassment and violence=== |
||
According to a report submitted to the United Nations [[Human Rights Committee]] by [[Global Rights]] and the [[International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission]], the criminalization of consensual homosexual sex in Zambia "has a devastating impact on same-sex practicing people in Zambia". The report asserts that |
According to a report submitted to the United Nations [[Human Rights Committee]] by [[Global Rights]] and the [[International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission]], the criminalization of consensual homosexual sex in Zambia "has a devastating impact on same-sex practicing people in Zambia". The report asserts that LGBTQ people are subject to [[arbitrary arrest and detention]], "discrimination in education, employment, housing, and access to services", and [[extortion]]–often with the knowledge or participation of law enforcement authorities.<ref name="Fabeni"/> The [[U.S. Department of State]]'s 2021 ''Human Rights Practices Report'' for Zambia concurs, stating:<ref name="2021-22 US State">{{multiref2|1={{cite report |author1=((Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor)) |title=2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia |chapter-url=https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/zambia/|date=2021 |publisher=United States Department of State |chapter=Section 6. Discrimination and Societal Abuses}}|2={{cite report |author1=((Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor))|title=2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia |chapter-url=https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/zambia|date=2022 |publisher=United States Department of State |chapter=Section 6. Discrimination and Societal Abuses}}}}</ref> |
||
{{bq|Police perpetrated violence and verbal and physical harassment against persons based on gender identity and sexual orientation. LGBTQI+ persons were at risk of societal violence due to prevailing prejudices, misperceptions of the law, lack of legal protections, and inability to access healthcare services, and were subjected to prolonged detentions.}} |
{{bq|Police perpetrated violence and verbal and physical harassment against persons based on gender identity and sexual orientation. LGBTQI+ persons were at risk of societal violence due to prevailing prejudices, misperceptions of the law, lack of legal protections, and inability to access healthcare services, and were subjected to prolonged detentions.}} |
||
The report notes that LGBTQI+ advocacy groups advise that police regularly solicit bribes from arrested individuals for alleged same-sex activity. |
The report notes that LGBTQI+ advocacy groups advise that police regularly solicit bribes from arrested individuals for alleged same-sex activity. |
||
Line 149: | Line 150: | ||
The research and advocacy group [[Human Rights Watch]] reports the use of forced anal examinations for police prosecutions, despite such procedures having no evidentiary value as to same-sex activity. The examinations are widely condemned as invasive and traumatic. They are viewed as abusive treatment by the World Health Organisation and medical authorities.<ref name="dd hrw">{{Cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/07/12/dignity-debased/forced-anal-examinations-homosexuality-prosecutions|title=Dignity Debased: Forced Anal Examinations in Homosexuality Prosecutions|date=2016-07-12|website=Human Rights Watch|language=en|access-date=2019-07-01}}</ref> In reporting a specific 2014 prosecution, [[Amnesty International]] described the treatment of the two men in the case, who were subjected to forced anal examinations as "tantamount to torture and scientifically invalid".<ref>{{cite web |author1=((Amnesty International)) |title=Zambia: End state-sponsored persecution as same-sex trial reaches verdict |url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2014/02/zambia-end-state-sponsored-persecution-same-sex-trial-reaches-verdict/ |website=Amnesty International |access-date=20 July 2022 |language=en |date=21 February 2014}}</ref> |
The research and advocacy group [[Human Rights Watch]] reports the use of forced anal examinations for police prosecutions, despite such procedures having no evidentiary value as to same-sex activity. The examinations are widely condemned as invasive and traumatic. They are viewed as abusive treatment by the World Health Organisation and medical authorities.<ref name="dd hrw">{{Cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/07/12/dignity-debased/forced-anal-examinations-homosexuality-prosecutions|title=Dignity Debased: Forced Anal Examinations in Homosexuality Prosecutions|date=2016-07-12|website=Human Rights Watch|language=en|access-date=2019-07-01}}</ref> In reporting a specific 2014 prosecution, [[Amnesty International]] described the treatment of the two men in the case, who were subjected to forced anal examinations as "tantamount to torture and scientifically invalid".<ref>{{cite web |author1=((Amnesty International)) |title=Zambia: End state-sponsored persecution as same-sex trial reaches verdict |url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2014/02/zambia-end-state-sponsored-persecution-same-sex-trial-reaches-verdict/ |website=Amnesty International |access-date=20 July 2022 |language=en |date=21 February 2014}}</ref> |
||
LGBTQI+ individuals are at risk of harassment in the community from threats, stalking, vandalism and even violence.<ref name="2021-22 US State"/><ref name="76 crimes 2014"/><ref name=hdtrust>{{cite web|url=https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/zambia/|title=Country Profile: Zambia|website=Human Dignity Trust|access-date=13 June 2022}}</ref> According to a report by [[Behind the Mask (NPO)|Behind the Mask]], a non-profit organisation dedicated to |
LGBTQI+ individuals are at risk of harassment in the community from threats, stalking, vandalism and even violence.<ref name="2021-22 US State"/><ref name="76 crimes 2014"/><ref name=hdtrust>{{cite web|url=https://www.humandignitytrust.org/country-profile/zambia/|title=Country Profile: Zambia|website=Human Dignity Trust|access-date=13 June 2022}}</ref> According to a report by [[Behind the Mask (NPO)|Behind the Mask]], a non-profit organisation dedicated to LGBTQ affairs in Africa,<ref>{{cite web |
||
| url = http://www.mask.org.za/index.php?page=whoweare |
| url = http://www.mask.org.za/index.php?page=whoweare |
||
| title = Who we are |
| title = Who we are |
||
Line 158: | Line 159: | ||
| url-status = dead |
| url-status = dead |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
most |
most LGBTQ people in Zambia are [[closeted]] due to fear of targeting and victimisation. [[Lesbian]]s are especially vulnerable, according to the report, due to the [[patriarchal]] structure of Zambian society.<ref name="Numwa"/> |
||
===HIV/AIDS=== |
===HIV/AIDS=== |
||
Line 231: | Line 232: | ||
{{Portal|LGBTQ|Zambia}} |
{{Portal|LGBTQ|Zambia}} |
||
* [[Human rights in Zambia]] |
* [[Human rights in Zambia]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[LGBTQ rights in Africa]] |
||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
Line 255: | Line 256: | ||
{{ref begin}} |
{{ref begin}} |
||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080728010943/http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travelling-and-living-overseas/travel-advice-by-country/sub-saharan-africa/zambia?ta=lawsCustoms&pg=3 UK government travel advisory for Zambia: Local laws and customs] |
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20080728010943/http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travelling-and-living-overseas/travel-advice-by-country/sub-saharan-africa/zambia?ta=lawsCustoms&pg=3 UK government travel advisory for Zambia: Local laws and customs] |
||
* {{cite news |title=MMD, UPND reject Gay rights in Zambia |url=https://www.lusakatimes.com/2010/05/08/mmd-upnd-reject-gay-rights-zambia/ |work=[[Times of Zambia]] |publisher=[[Government of Zambia]] |date=8 May 2010 |via= |
* {{cite news |title=MMD, UPND reject Gay rights in Zambia |url=https://www.lusakatimes.com/2010/05/08/mmd-upnd-reject-gay-rights-zambia/ |work=[[Times of Zambia]] |publisher=[[Government of Zambia]] |date=8 May 2010 |via=Lusaka Times|archive-date=29 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230529052618/https://www.lusakatimes.com/2010/05/08/mmd-upnd-reject-gay-rights-zambia/}} |
||
* {{cite news |last1=Lumba |first1=Hildah |title=Christianity and the Constitution |url=https://www.times.co.zm/?p=79728 |work=Times of Zambia |date=19 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220404115644/http://www.times.co.zm/?p=79728 |archive-date=4 April 2022}} [Opinion piece arguing against same-sex marriage recognition.] |
* {{cite news |last1=Lumba |first1=Hildah |title=Christianity and the Constitution |url=https://www.times.co.zm/?p=79728 |work=Times of Zambia |date=19 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220404115644/http://www.times.co.zm/?p=79728 |archive-date=4 April 2022}} [Opinion piece arguing against same-sex marriage recognition.] |
||
* Opinion column examining the potential for attitudinal change in conservative Christian clergy in Africa, and their positive engagement with LGBT persons: {{cite news |last1=Kuria |first1=David |title=Study shows religious leaders can change negative attitude on LGBTQ+ Kenyans |url=https://nation.africa/kenya/brand-book/can-religious-leaders-change-negative-attitude-on-lgbtq-3644804 |work=Nation |date=22 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220502090307/https://nation.africa/kenya/brand-book/can-religious-leaders-change-negative-attitude-on-lgbtq-3644804 |archive-date=2 May 2022 |language=en}} This short article summarises the findings of the study: |
* Opinion column examining the potential for attitudinal change in conservative Christian clergy in Africa, and their positive engagement with LGBT persons: {{cite news |last1=Kuria |first1=David |title=Study shows religious leaders can change negative attitude on LGBTQ+ Kenyans |url=https://nation.africa/kenya/brand-book/can-religious-leaders-change-negative-attitude-on-lgbtq-3644804 |work=Nation |date=22 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220502090307/https://nation.africa/kenya/brand-book/can-religious-leaders-change-negative-attitude-on-lgbtq-3644804 |archive-date=2 May 2022 |language=en}} This short article summarises the findings of the study: |
||
Line 266: | Line 267: | ||
[[Category:Politics of Zambia]] |
[[Category:Politics of Zambia]] |
||
[[Category:Law of Zambia]] |
[[Category:Law of Zambia]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:LGBTQ rights by country]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:LGBTQ rights in Africa]] |
||
[[Category:LGBTQ in Zambia]] |
Latest revision as of 07:48, 1 December 2024
LGBTQ rights in Zambia | |
---|---|
Status | Illegal since 1911 (as Rhodesia)[1][2] |
Penalty | Imprisonment: 15 years − possible life sentence[3] |
Gender identity | No |
Military | No |
Discrimination protections | None |
Family rights | |
Recognition of relationships | No recognition of same-sex unions |
Adoption | No |
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people in Zambia face significant challenges not experienced by non-LGBTQ residents.[4] Same-sex sexual activity is illegal for both men and women in Zambia.[1] Formerly a colony of the British Empire, Zambia inherited the laws and legal system of its colonial occupiers upon independence in 1964. Laws concerning homosexuality have largely remained unchanged since then, and homosexuality is covered by sodomy laws that also proscribe bestiality.[1] Social attitudes toward LGBTQ people are mostly negative and coloured by perceptions that homosexuality is immoral and a form of insanity.[1] However, in recent years, younger generations are beginning to show positive and open minded attitudes towards their LGBTQ peers.
LGBTQ persons are subjected to human rights violations by police and authorities. Subject to arbitrary arrest and detentions, they suffer violence and abuse in custody. Police are reported to threaten and extort LGBTQ persons. Those prosecuted for same-sex conduct are subjected to the use of forced anal examinations for evidence-gathering purposes. Such procedures are invasive and traumatic and are widely condemned by medical authorities and human rights groups; they are discredited for the purpose of providing any evidence of same-sex sexual activity.
Other serious societal discrimination and abuse is directed towards LGBTQ persons. They may be targeted threats, stalking, vandalism, violence, and other hate crimes, including murders. LGBTQ people routinely face community harassment and discrimination, with little recourse to assistance from police or government.
In recent years, the onset of the internet has led to more positive support and opinions towards the LGBTQ community. The fast digitization of the country has led to exposure to more people and stories from different facets of life. This in turn has led to more open minded attitudes amongst the growing youth reducing discrimination and prejudice among people of different communities.
Laws
[edit]Same-sex sexual activity is proscribed by Sections 155 and 156 of Zambia's penal code (as amended 1933 and repealed and replaced by Act No. 15 of 2005).[a] The law criminalizes consensual same-sex sexual conduct, with penalties upon conviction for engaging in "acts against the order of nature" of fifteen years' to life imprisonment. Convictions under the lesser charge of "gross indecency" carries a penalty of up to fourteen years' imprisonment.[3][5][6][7][8]
"Unnatural" offences
[edit]Section 155 ("Unnatural Offences") criminalizes homosexual sex as a felony punishable by terms of imprisonment which range from fifteen years, up to a life sentence.[3][6]
Any person who- (a) has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature;[a] or ... (c) permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature; commits a felony and liable, upon conviction, to imprisonment for a term not less than fifteen years and may be liable to imprisonment for life
Section 156 imposes imprisonment for seven years for any attempt "to commit any of the offences specified in section one hundred and fifty-five".[6]
"Indecent" practices
[edit]The lesser offence of "indecent practices between persons of the same sex" is "any act of gross indecency" that a man commits with a man [s. 158, §(1)] or a woman commits with another woman [s. 158, §(2)]. These offences attract penalties of terms of imprisonment of between seven years and fourteen years.[6][9]
Although no specific criminal penalty is set out, Section 158, §(3)[a] as amended in 2005,[b] is to regulate any same-sex sexual contact between minors, applying to:[6]
A child who, whether in public or private, commits any act of gross indecency with another child of the same sex or attempts to procure the commission of any such act by any person with the child's self or with another child or person of the same sex, whether in public or private, commits an offence and is liable, to such community service or counseling as the court may determine in the best interests of the child.
There is no similar legislative provision in the penal code that covers sexual conduct between minors of opposite sex.[6]
Restrictions on advocacy
[edit]The Zambian government does not permit advocacy of LGBTQ rights;[8] despite this, freedom of expression has been affirmed by the courts.[10] Nevertheless, in their 2021 report, the bare conclusion of the U.S. Department of State was: "Freedom of expression or peaceful assembly on LGBTQI+ matters remained nonexistent."[9]
In 1998, in a statement to the National Assembly of Zambia, Vice President Christon Tembo called for the arrest of individuals who promote gay rights, citing a need to "protect public morality".[8] President Frederick Chiluba described homosexuality as "unbiblical" and "against human nature".[11] Later, Home Affairs Minister Peter Machungwa ordered the arrest of any individual or group attempting to formally register a gay rights advocacy group. Herbert Nyendwa, the Registrar of Societies, stated that he would refuse to register any LGBTQ organisation or civic group.[8]
The People v. Paul Kasonkomona
[edit]The restrictions on advocating for LGBTQ rights were challenged in Zambia's courts in 2013, after a human rights activist appeared on TV talk show program. During the program, the activist called for the decriminalization of homosexuality in Zambia,[12] the recognition of rights for sexual minorities,[10] and HIV's spread to be combated among sexual minority groups.[13] After the program, the activist was stopped by police, held in jail overnight, and accused of inciting the public to take part in indecent activities.[12][13][14] The activist was later charged with "idle and disorderly conduct under Section 178(g) of the Penal Code, of the Laws of Zambia".[13][15]
The activist challenged the charges in court by questioning three definitions to which he was charged: (1) "soliciting", (2) "public space", and (3) "immoral purposes".[13][15] In the first level of court, the Magistrate Court, the judge ruled in favour of the activist and stated the activist's statements reflected an act of freedom of expression.[10][15] The government challenged the decision.
In the High Court, the judiciary ruled that the government could not prove that the activist's participation in the debate could not be considered "soliciting" as the activist's calls were not persistent and did not contain an element of pressure.[13] The court agreed that the television program could be considered a "public place".[13] The court did not agree with the government that the activist's statements were for "immoral purposes" as the activist was not encouraging people to engage in same-sex activities but to protect people from harm.[10][13][15] Additionally, the High Court further ruled that the activist was reasonably exercising his right to freedom of expression.[10][13][15][16]
Constitutional provisions
[edit]This section has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
As many East and Southern African former British colonies have done, Zambia enacted its own constitution in the 1990s. This overrides much of the pre-1964 criminal code, and there are very broad protections against discrimination, with much of the language lifted from the UN Charter on Human Rights.[17]
23. [Protection from discrimination on the ground of race,etc.]
- Subject to clauses (4), (5) and (7), no law shall make any provision that is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect.
- Subject to clauses (6), (7) and (8), no person shall be treated in a discriminatory manner by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority.
- In this Article the expression "discriminatory" mean, affording different treatment to different persons attributable, wholly or mainly to their respective descriptions by race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, political opinions colour or creed whereby persons of one such description are subjected to disabilities or restrictions to which persons of another such description are not made subject or are accorded privileges or advantages which are not accorded to persons of another such description.
It can be argued that homosexuality is constitutionally protected under Article 23 of the 1996 Constitution. As constitutions override other laws, this may be why few, if any, prosecutions for homosexuality have taken place, as this would allow the relevant Criminal Code sections to be tested, and deleted if they are found to contravene the Constitution.
The Constitution of 1991, as amended by Act no. 17 of 1996, contains an anti-discrimination clause, present in Article 23 of the document. According to Article 23(1), "no law shall make any provision that is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect". Article 23(2) further prohibits discrimination "by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority", and Article 23(3) defines discrimination as extending to differential treatment of persons on the basis of "race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, political opinions, color or creed". There is implicit but no explicit legal protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the Zambian Constitution. [8]
Legal action and reform
[edit]Although Zambia has maintained a strict stance against any form of LGBTQ activity, there have been a number of efforts by the UN to get Zambia to change its policies and law regarding same-sex activity. These efforts have been largely in vain as Zambia sustained its policies.
Zambian legal policies regarding same-sex activity have effectively bred a national environment of homophobia which has made it to where that the justice system severely disadvantages LGBTQ identifying individuals. The justice system fails to recognize and protect the lives of LGBTQ citizens which has in effect opened the window for citizen-based militia activity against LGBTQ individuals. The US Department of State's 2010 report on human rights in Zambia states that:[18]
...the government enforces law that criminalizes homosexual conduct and did not respond to societal discrimination ... according to LGBT advocacy groups, societal violence occurred, as did societal discrimination in employment, housing, and access to education or health care ... LGBT groups reported frequent attacks and discrimination in the neighborhoods in which they operated. Activists reported regular harassment, including threats via text message and e-mail, vandalism, stalking, and outright violence.
In April 2013, Paul Kasonkomona, a notable Zambian LGBTQ activist, was arrested for speaking about LBGT and HIV related issues on a local TV station.[19] Kasonkomona was charged with the crime of "soliciting in a public place for immoral purpose." Also in 2013, two gay-identifying men were beaten outside of a nightclub after being found in a "compromising position". They decided against pressing charges out of the fear of being jailed themselves.
In May 2014, citizens of the Marapodi area of Lusaka apprehended two women who were suspected lesbians. They captured the women, brought them to the local police station, and demanded their arrest.[20]
In January 2015, an openly gay man was attacked by a mob which reportedly included three police officers.[21]
Zambia has abstained from/denied a number of reform efforts. In 2011, Zambia was one of three countries to abstain from a call from the Human Rights Council to prepare a report on the rights of its LGBTQ citizens.[22] In a 2012 UPR review, Zambia rejected recommendations to repeal laws criminalizing same-sex relations. This followed a similar recommendation by the UPR in its 2008 review. The Zambian delegation provided the following in defense of their rejections:[23]
the Constitution making process will give the people the opportunity to determine whether specific rights for LGBTQ persons should be enshrined in the Constitution. The Government was determined not to prescribe to the Zambian people those rights that the Constitution should contain, but to let them make such a determination.
However, in its 2018 review, Zambia noted the recommendations to decriminalize same-sex relations.[24] Aside from this, no further actions have been made thus far.
Recognition of same-sex relationships
[edit]Zambia provides no recognition of same-sex couples. In 2006, Home Affairs Minister Ronnie Shikapwasha stated that Zambia would never legalize same-sex marriage, claiming that it is a sin that goes against the country's Christian status .[25] In February 2010, the National Constitutional Conference (NCC) unanimously agreed to adopt a clause that expressly forbids marriage between people of the same sex.[26]
Living conditions
[edit]The U.S. Department of State's 2010 Human Rights Report found that "the government enforced the law that criminalizes homosexual conduct and did not respond to societal discrimination" and that "societal violence against homosexual persons occurred, as did societal discrimination in employment, housing, and access to education or health care."[18]
Community attitudes
[edit]Zambia's societal attitudes towards homosexuality strongly reflect the influences of evangelical religions and historical colonial attitudes to homosexuality. Arguably the largest recipient of fundamentalist evangelical missionaries during British colonial times, such fundamentalist-style religious adherence is widespread in Zambia.[27][28][29][30]
In 1999, the non-governmental organisation Zambia Against People with Abnormal Sexual Acts (ZAPASA) formed to combat homosexuality and homosexuals in Zambia.[1][8]
A 2010 survey revealed that only 2 percent of Zambians find homosexuality to be morally acceptable, nine points below the figure recorded in Uganda (11 percent acceptance).[31] In 2013, Christine Kaseba, the wife of former President Michael Sata, said that "silence around issues of men who have sex with men should be stopped and no one should be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation."[32]
Harassment and violence
[edit]According to a report submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee by Global Rights and the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, the criminalization of consensual homosexual sex in Zambia "has a devastating impact on same-sex practicing people in Zambia". The report asserts that LGBTQ people are subject to arbitrary arrest and detention, "discrimination in education, employment, housing, and access to services", and extortion–often with the knowledge or participation of law enforcement authorities.[8] The U.S. Department of State's 2021 Human Rights Practices Report for Zambia concurs, stating:[9]
Police perpetrated violence and verbal and physical harassment against persons based on gender identity and sexual orientation. LGBTQI+ persons were at risk of societal violence due to prevailing prejudices, misperceptions of the law, lack of legal protections, and inability to access healthcare services, and were subjected to prolonged detentions.
The report notes that LGBTQI+ advocacy groups advise that police regularly solicit bribes from arrested individuals for alleged same-sex activity.
The research and advocacy group Human Rights Watch reports the use of forced anal examinations for police prosecutions, despite such procedures having no evidentiary value as to same-sex activity. The examinations are widely condemned as invasive and traumatic. They are viewed as abusive treatment by the World Health Organisation and medical authorities.[33] In reporting a specific 2014 prosecution, Amnesty International described the treatment of the two men in the case, who were subjected to forced anal examinations as "tantamount to torture and scientifically invalid".[34]
LGBTQI+ individuals are at risk of harassment in the community from threats, stalking, vandalism and even violence.[9][21][35] According to a report by Behind the Mask, a non-profit organisation dedicated to LGBTQ affairs in Africa,[36] most LGBTQ people in Zambia are closeted due to fear of targeting and victimisation. Lesbians are especially vulnerable, according to the report, due to the patriarchal structure of Zambian society.[1]
HIV/AIDS
[edit]As of July 2007, no public or private programmes provide HIV-related counselling to homosexual men in Zambia, where the HIV seroprevalence rate among adults is approximately 17 percent.[37] Although men involved in same-sex sexual relationships have a higher risk of HIV transmission, the government-operated National AIDS Control Program does not address same-sex relationships.[8]
In June 2007, the Zambian Ministry of Health agreed to conduct, together with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Society for Family Health under Population Services International, an assessment to evaluate HIV and AIDS prevalence and transmission among gay men.[38]
Summary table
[edit]Same-sex sexual activity legal | (Penalty: Imprisonment; from 15 years, up to possible life sentence)[3][6][35] |
Equal age of consent | |
Anti-discrimination laws in employment only | |
Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services | |
Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (incl. indirect discrimination, hate speech) | |
Recognition of same-sex couples | |
Step-child adoption by same-sex couples | |
Joint adoption by same-sex couples | |
Gays allowed to serve in the military | |
Right to change legal gender | |
Access to IVF for lesbians | |
Commercial surrogacy for gay male couples | |
MSMs allowed to donate blood |
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ a b c d Some contiguous provisions of "Unnatural offences" are omitted intentionally: Section 157 of the code is not relevant; it covers "harmful cultural practices" on children, such as female genital mutilation, and other abuse of minors. Likewise, the special provisions of Section 155: §i, §ii, §iii, cover only child sexual abuse, carrying penalties of imprisonment of at least twenty-five years with the possibility of imprisonment for life; while 155 §(b) proscribes bestiality. In the "Indecent practices" section, 158 §(1) and §(2) are relevant, although they include offences against children; in the code, these offences against minors are combined in the same clauses as "gross indecency" applying between adults.
- ^ a b The version prior to the 2005 amendment (as amended by No. 26 of 1933), had the similar provision that referred only to (adult) males:[39][7]
Section 158: Any male person who, whether in public or private, commits any act of gross indecency with another male person, or procures another male person to commit any act of gross indecency with him, or attempts to procure the commission of any such act by any male person with himself or with another male person, whether in public or private, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for five years.
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f Numwa, Regina. "Zambia". Behind The Mask. Archived from the original on 4 June 2008. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ "Where is it illegal to be gay?". BBC News. 10 February 2014.
- ^ a b c d ILGA (December 2020). State-Sponsored Homophobia - 2020 global legislation overview update (PDF) (Report). p. 125. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 December 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "Zambia". Human Dignity Trust. Retrieved 25 August 2023.
- ^ This article incorporates public domain material from 2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia. United States Department of State.
- ^ a b c d e f g Government of the Republic of Zambia (2005) [Penal Code Act 1931], "Chapter XV: Offences against morality: Sections 155–156 ['Unnatural offences']; Section 158 ['Indecent practices between persons of the same sex'], §(1–3); (As amended by No. 26 of 1933 and repealed and replaced by Act No. 15 of 2005)", The Penal Code Act (PDF), Chapter 87 of The Laws of Zambia, Parliament of Zambia, [As amended, 2005], archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2022, retrieved 15 June 2022 – via UN International Labour Organization
- ^ a b "UPR: Universal Periodic Review - Zambia - Reference Documents: Contributions for the Summary of Stakeholder's information". OHCHR.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Stefano Fabeni; Cary Alan Johnson; Joel Nana (July 2007). "The Violations of the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons in Zambia" (PDF). Global Rights and International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission. Submission to United Nations Human Rights Council: Universal Periodic Review - Zambia - Reference Documents. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 June 2022. Retrieved 14 June 2022 – via Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
- ^ a b c d
- Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (2021). "Section 6. Discrimination and Societal Abuses". 2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia (Report). United States Department of State.
- Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (2022). "Section 6. Discrimination and Societal Abuses". 2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia (Report). United States Department of State.
- ^ a b c d e Reid & Meerkotter, G. & A. (4 August 2015). "Africa Ruling Move LGBT Rights Forward". Jurist. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
- ^ "Special Issues and Campaigns: Lesbian And Gay Rights". World Report 1999. Human Rights Watch. 1999. Archived from the original on 23 July 2008. Retrieved 6 August 2008.
- ^ a b Smith, D. (9 April 2013). "Zambian gay rights activist arrested". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f g h "The people v. Kasonkomona". Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. n.d. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
- ^ "Amnesty calls for release of Zambia's first arrested gay couple". Mail and Guardian. 12 September 2013. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
- ^ a b c d e "Chapter Six: Gender, Sexuality, Women and Discrimination—The People v. Paul Kasonkomona [2015] HPA/53/2014 Zambia, High Court" (PDF). Reproductive and Sexual Rights in Sub-saharan African courts. Legal Grounds. Vol. III. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press. 2017. pp. 155–157. ISBN 978-1-920538-63-7.
- ^ Adjetey, Elvis (19 May 2022). "Zambia: Anger as embassies fly gay pride flags". Africa Feeds. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ Human Rights in UNDP: Practice Note (PDF) (Report). United Nations Development Programme. April 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 June 2007. Retrieved 25 October 2011.
- ^ a b Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (2011). 2010 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Zambia (PDF) (Report). United States Department of State. p. 28. Archived from the original on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 26 March 2020. [PDF sourced via United States Mission to the United Nations]
- ^ "NEWS RELEASE: ZAMBIA HIGH COURT CONFIRMS ACQUITTAL OF HIV ACTIVIST, PAUL KASONKOMONA – Southern Africa Litigation Centre". Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- ^ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2016). Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2015: Zambia. US Department of State (Report). Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- ^ a b "Zambia's growing intolerance towards LGBTI persons". Erasing 76 Crimes. 31 January 2014. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- ^ "Human Rights Documents". ap.ohchr.org. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- ^ "ODS HOME PAGE" (PDF). documents-dds-ny.un.org. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- ^ "ODS HOME PAGE" (PDF). documents-dds-ny.un.org. Retrieved 26 March 2020.
- ^ "Zambia will never legalise gay marriages-gov't". African Veil. 10 December 2006. Archived from the original on 17 September 2010. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ NCC to adopt clause that forbids same sex marriage Archived 8 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Carr, Robert. Stephen Luscombe (ed.). "Jerusalem Lost — The Evangelical Empire: Christianity's contribution to Victorian Colonial Expansion". British Empire. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ "Student term paper". College of Charleston. Archived from the original on 19 August 2011.[better source needed]
- ^ "History of Protestant Missions in Zimbabwe". Wmausa.org. Archived from the original on 7 March 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ "Christianity". Jd-elliott.net. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ "The Global Divide on Homosexuality". Pew Research Center. 4 June 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ Jean Ann Esselink (8 November 2013). "Zambia's First Lady Stuns Africa By Calling for an End To Homophobia". The New Civil Rights Movement. Archived from the original on 11 November 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ "Dignity Debased: Forced Anal Examinations in Homosexuality Prosecutions". Human Rights Watch. 12 July 2016. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
- ^ Amnesty International (21 February 2014). "Zambia: End state-sponsored persecution as same-sex trial reaches verdict". Amnesty International. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
- ^ a b "Country Profile: Zambia". Human Dignity Trust. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
- ^ "Who we are". Behind The Mask. Archived from the original on 28 June 2008. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ "Zambia". The World Factbook 2008. Central Intelligence Agency. 15 May 2008. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ Mhlambiso, Nthateng (26 July 2007). "Hope for Zambian MSM". Behind The Mask. Archived from the original on 29 October 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ Government of the Republic of Zambia (1931), "Chapter XV: Offences against morality: Sections 155–156 ['Unnatural offences']; Section 158 ['Indecent practices between males']", The Penal Code Act (PDF), Chapter 87 of The Laws of Zambia, Ministry of Legal Affairs, [Pre-2005 version of Code], archived from the original (PDF) on 17 May 2022, retrieved 13 June 2022
Further reading
[edit]- UK government travel advisory for Zambia: Local laws and customs
- "MMD, UPND reject Gay rights in Zambia". Times of Zambia. Government of Zambia. 8 May 2010. Archived from the original on 29 May 2023 – via Lusaka Times.
- Lumba, Hildah (19 February 2022). "Christianity and the Constitution". Times of Zambia. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022. [Opinion piece arguing against same-sex marriage recognition.]
- Opinion column examining the potential for attitudinal change in conservative Christian clergy in Africa, and their positive engagement with LGBT persons: Kuria, David (22 December 2021). "Study shows religious leaders can change negative attitude on LGBTQ+ Kenyans". Nation. Archived from the original on 2 May 2022. This short article summarises the findings of the study:
- Mbote, David Kuria; Sandfort, Theo G. M.; Waweru, Esther; Zapfel, Andrew (13 June 2018). "Kenyan Religious Leaders' Views on Same-Sex Sexuality and Gender Nonconformity: Religious Freedom versus Constitutional Rights". The Journal of Sex Research. 55 (4–5): 630–641. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1255702. PMC 5474220. PMID 27982708.