Jump to content

The Indian Antiquary: Difference between revisions

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Folktale is a folklore genre
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Academic journal from India}}
{{good article}}
{{good article}}
{{EngvarB|date=June 2014}}
{{EngvarB|date=June 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2014}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2014}}
{{Infobox journal
{{Italic title}}
[[File:Page from The Indian Antiquary.jpg|thumbnail|right|Cover page of a 1931 edition of ''The Indian Antiquary'']]
| title = The Indian Antiquary
| image = Page from The Indian Antiquary.jpg
⚫
'''''The Indian Antiquary, A journal of oriental research in archaeology, history, literature, language, philosophy, religion, folklore, &c, &c,''''' (subtitle varies) was a journal of original research relating to India, published between 1872 and 1933. It was founded by the archaeologist [[James Burgess (archaeologist)|James Burgess]] to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India and was notable for the high quality of its epigraphic illustrations which enabled scholars to make accurate translations of texts that in many cases remain the definitive versions to this day. It was also pioneering in its recording of Indian [[folklore]]. It was succeeded by ''The New Indian Antiquary'' (1938-47) and the ''Indian Antiquary'' (1964-71).
| caption = Cover page of a 1931 edition of ''The Indian Antiquary''
| former_name =
| abbreviation = Indian Antiqu.
| discipline = [[Numismatics]], [[Archaeology]], [[Asian history]], [[Folklore]], [[Philology]], [[Anthropology]], [[Indology]]
| language =
| editor =
| publisher = [[Bombay Education Society]], [[British India Press]]
| country = India
| history = 1872–1971
| frequency =
| openaccess =
| license =
| impact =
| impact-year =
| ISSN = 0019-4395
| eISSN =
| CODEN =
| JSTOR =
| LCCN =
| OCLC = 891010482
| website =
| link1 =
| link1-name =
| link2 =
| link2-name =
}}
⚫
'''''The Indian Antiquary: A journal of oriental research in archaeology, history, literature, language, philosophy, religion, folklore, &c, &c''''' (subtitle varies) was a journal of original research relating to India, published between 1872 and 1933. It was founded by the archaeologist [[James Burgess (archaeologist)|James Burgess]] to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India and was notable for the high quality of its epigraphic illustrations which enabled scholars to make accurate translations of texts that in many cases remain the definitive versions to this day. It was also pioneering in its recording of Indian [[folklore]]. It was succeeded by ''The New Indian Antiquary'' (1938–47) and the ''Indian Antiquary'' (1964–71).


==History==
==History==
''The Indian Antiquary'' was founded in 1872 by the archaeologist [[James Burgess (archaeologist)|James Burgess]] [[Order of the Indian Empire|CIE]] as a journal of original research relating to India. It was designed to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India.<ref name=Pros>[http://indianhistorybooks.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/indian-antiquary-vol-i-1872.pdf Prospectus] in ''The Indian Antiquary'', Part 1, 5 January 1872, p. 1.</ref><ref>"The Indian Antiquary" in ''[[The Antiquaries Journal]]'', Vol. 2, No. 2, April 1922, p. 148.</ref>
''The Indian Antiquary'' was founded in 1872 by the archaeologist [[James Burgess (archaeologist)|James Burgess]] [[Order of the Indian Empire|CIE]] as a journal of original research relating to India. It was designed to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India.<ref name=Pros>[http://indianhistorybooks.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/indian-antiquary-vol-i-1872.pdf Prospectus] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140530053647/http://indianhistorybooks.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/indian-antiquary-vol-i-1872.pdf |date=30 May 2014 }} in ''The Indian Antiquary'', Part 1, 5 January 1872, p. 1.</ref><ref>"The Indian Antiquary" in ''[[The Antiquaries Journal]]'', Vol. 2, No. 2, April 1922, p. 148.</ref>


The journal was a private venture,<ref name=Temp>[[Richard Carnac Temple|Temple, Richard Carnac]]. (1922) ''[https://archive.org/details/fiftyyearsofthei00temprich Fifty years of The Indian Antiquary]''. Mazgaon, Bombay: B. Miller, British India Press, pp. 3-4.</ref> although no contributor or editor was ever paid for their work and the editors often had to support the publication out of their own pockets.<ref name=Temp/> Burgess was the first editor and he continued in that role until the end of 1884 when failing eyesight forced him to hand over to John Faithfull Fleet and [[Richard Carnac Temple]].<ref name=Temp/>
The journal was a private venture,<ref name=Temp>[[Richard Carnac Temple|Temple, Richard Carnac]]. (1922) ''[https://archive.org/details/fiftyyearsofthei00temprich Fifty years of The Indian Antiquary]''. Mazgaon, Bombay: B. Miller, British India Press, pp. 3-4.</ref> although no contributor or editor was ever paid for their work and the editors often had to support the publication out of their own pockets.<ref name=Temp/> Burgess was the first editor and he continued in that role until the end of 1884 when failing eyesight forced him to hand over to John Faithfull Fleet and [[Richard Carnac Temple]].<ref name=Temp/>


The late nineteenth century was marked by a great increase in the number of local historical societies in India and a similar increase in the number of Indians who could speak and write English, to the extent that by the 1920s the entire journal could have been filled with work by Indian contributors.<ref name="Temple, p. 7"/> Volumes for 1925 to 1932 were published under the authority of the Council of the [[Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland|Royal Anthropological Institute]] (1933, not).<ref name=sun/> The first incarnation of the ''Antiquary'' ceased publication in 1933 with volume 62, number 783 (Dec. 1933),<ref name=sun>[http://suncat.ac.uk/serials/SC00623823801/all ''Indian antiquary''.] Suncat. Retrieved 10 January 2017.</ref> two years after Richard Temple's death in 1931.<ref name="odnb">{{cite web |title=Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, second baronet (1850–1931), army officer and oriental scholar |first=R. E. |last=Enthoven |authorlink=Reginald Edward Enthoven |others=Revised by Jones, M. G. M. |work=Oxford Dictionary of National Biography |publisher=Oxford University Press |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36453 |accessdate=10 January 2017}} {{ODNBsub}}</ref> Several early volumes of the journal were reprinted by Swati Publications in Delhi, 1984.<ref>[https://openlibrary.org/books/OL25104914M/The_Indian_Antiquary ''The Indian Antiquary''.] Open Library. Retrieved 9 January 2017.</ref>
The late nineteenth century was marked by a great increase in the number of local historical societies in India and a similar increase in the number of Indians who could speak and write English, to the extent that by the 1920s the entire journal could have been filled with work by Indian contributors.<ref name="Temple, p. 7"/> Volumes for 1925 to 1932 were published under the authority of the Council of the [[Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland|Royal Anthropological Institute]] (1933, not).<ref name=sun/> The first incarnation of the ''Antiquary'' ceased publication in 1933 with volume 62, number 783 (Dec. 1933),<ref name=sun>[http://suncat.ac.uk/serials/SC00623823801/all ''Indian antiquary''.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170111003849/http://suncat.ac.uk/serials/SC00623823801/all |date=11 January 2017 }} Suncat. Retrieved 10 January 2017.</ref> two years after Richard Temple's death in 1931 when it was edited by [[C. E. A. W. Oldham]].<ref name="odnb">{{cite ODNB |title=Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, second baronet (1850–1931), army officer and oriental scholar |first=R. E. |last=Enthoven |authorlink=Reginald Edward Enthoven |others=Revised by Jones, M. G. M. |year=2004 |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/36453 |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/36453 |access-date=10 January 2017}}</ref> Several early volumes of the journal were reprinted by Swati Publications in Delhi, 1984.<ref>[https://openlibrary.org/books/OL25104914M/The_Indian_Antiquary ''The Indian Antiquary''.] Open Library. Retrieved 9 January 2017.</ref>


The '''''New Indian Antiquary''''' was published between 1938<ref>[http://www.southasiaarchive.com/Content/sarf.120202 ''New Indian Antiquary''.] South Asia Archive, 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.</ref> and 1947, and the '''''Indian Antiquary''''' (described as the "third series") between 1964 and 1971.<ref name=BL>''Indian Antiquary'', British Library catalogue search, 29 May 2014.</ref> (Volumes 14 to 62 of the original ''Antiquary'' were described as the "second series".)<ref>''Indian Antiquary'', British Library catalogue search, 10 January 2017.</ref>
The '''''New Indian Antiquary''''' was published between 1938<ref>[http://www.southasiaarchive.com/Content/sarf.120202 ''New Indian Antiquary''.] South Asia Archive, 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.</ref> and 1947, and the '''''Indian Antiquary''''' (described as the "third series") between 1964 and 1971.<ref name=BL>''Indian Antiquary'', British Library catalogue search, 29 May 2014.</ref> (Volumes 14 to 62 of the original ''Antiquary'' were described as the "second series".)<ref>''Indian Antiquary'', British Library catalogue search, 10 January 2017.</ref>


==Content==
==Content==
The journal had an archaeological and historical focus, and in the late nineteenth century that naturally meant that [[epigraphy]] (the study of inscriptions as writing rather than as literature) would be one of the principal subjects covered in its pages.<ref name=Sal>{{cite book|author=Salomon, Richard (1998)|title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC&pg=PA219|date=|location= New York|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-535666-3|page=219}}</ref> Indeed, the ''Antiquary'' was the premier source of European scholarship on Indian epigraphy until the twentieth century and the official Indian government journal of epigraphy, the ''[[Epigraphia Indica]]'', was published as a quarterly supplement to the ''Antiquary'' between 1892 and 1920.<ref name=Temp/>
The journal had an archaeological and historical focus, and in the late nineteenth century that naturally meant that [[epigraphy]] (the study of inscriptions as writing rather than as literature) would be one of the principal subjects covered in its pages.<ref name=Sal>{{cite book|author=Salomon, Richard (1998)|title=Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XYrG07qQDxkC&pg=PA219|date=10 December 1998|location= New York|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-535666-3|page=219}}</ref> Indeed, the ''Antiquary'' was the premier source of European scholarship on Indian epigraphy until the twentieth century and the official Indian government journal of epigraphy, the ''[[Epigraphia Indica]]'', was published as a quarterly supplement to the ''Antiquary'' between 1892 and 1920.<ref name=Temp/>


The ''Antiquary'' was printed at [[Mazgaon]], Bombay, by the [[Bombay Education Society]] and later the British India Press, but illustrations were produced in London by the firm of Griggs who were known for the accuracy of their work.<ref name=Temple.p.6/> A high standard of reproduction was essential so that scholars could work on the epigraphic material without needing to see the originals.<ref name=Temple.p.6>Temple, p. 6.</ref> Illustrations in the ''Antiquary'' were used by scholars such as Bhandarkar, [[Bhagvanlal Indraji]], [[Georg Bühler]], [[John Faithfull Fleet]], Eggeling and B. Lewis Rice to decipher important inscriptions,<ref>[http://asi.nic.in/asi_aboutus_history.asp ''History'',] [[Archaeological Survey of India]], 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2014.</ref> and in many cases their translations remain the definitive versions to this day.<ref name=Sal/>
The ''Antiquary'' was printed at [[Mazgaon]], Bombay, by the [[Bombay Education Society]] and later the British India Press, but illustrations were produced in London by the firm of Griggs who were known for the accuracy of their work.<ref name=Temple.p.6/> A high standard of reproduction was essential so that scholars could work on the epigraphic material without needing to see the originals.<ref name=Temple.p.6>Temple, p. 6.</ref> Illustrations in the ''Antiquary'' were used by scholars such as Bhandarkar, [[Bhagvanlal Indraji]], [[Georg Bühler]], [[John Faithfull Fleet]], Eggeling and B. Lewis Rice to decipher important inscriptions,<ref>[http://asi.nic.in/asi_aboutus_history.asp ''History''], [[Archaeological Survey of India]], 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2014.</ref> and in many cases their translations remain the definitive versions to this day.<ref name=Sal/>


Over one thousand plates were included in ''The Indian Antiquary'' and the ''Epigraphia Indica'' over the first fifty years of publication, but having the illustrations produced abroad was not without its disadvantages. On one occasion during World War I, enemy action meant that expensive plates had to be sent from London three times before they reached Bombay safely.<ref name=Temple.p.6/>
Over one thousand plates were included in ''The Indian Antiquary'' and the ''Epigraphia Indica'' over the first fifty years of publication, but having the illustrations produced abroad was not without its disadvantages. On one occasion during World War I, enemy action meant that expensive plates had to be sent from London three times before they reached Bombay safely.<ref name=Temple.p.6/>


Another area where the ''Antiquary'' led was in recording folklore and folktales. Its publication of [[Punjab region|Punjab]] folktales was the first attempt to classify the events on which folk tales were based<ref name="Temple, p. 7">[https://archive.org/stream/fiftyyearsofthei00temprich#page/6/mode/2up Temple, p. 7.]</ref> and the pioneering work on north Indian folklore of [[William Crooke]] and [[Ram Gharib Chaube|Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube]] was printed in its pages.<ref name="CrookeChaube2002">"Introduction" by Sadhana Naithani in {{cite book|author1=William Crooke|author2=Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube|author3=|title=Folktales from Northern India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RcK2l0yE1OsC&pg=PT38|date=2002|location=Santa Barbara|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-698-9|page=38}}</ref>
Another area where the ''Antiquary'' led was in recording folklore and folktales. Its publication of [[Punjab region|Punjab]] folktales was the first attempt to classify the events on which folk tales were based<ref name="Temple, p. 7">[https://archive.org/stream/fiftyyearsofthei00temprich#page/6/mode/2up Temple, p. 7.]</ref> and the pioneering work on north Indian folklore of [[William Crooke]] and [[Ram Gharib Chaube|Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube]] was printed in its pages.<ref name="CrookeChaube2002">"Introduction" by Sadhana Naithani in {{cite book|author1=William Crooke|author2=Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube|title=Folktales from Northern India|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RcK2l0yE1OsC&pg=PT38|date=2002|location=Santa Barbara|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-698-9|page=38}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 29: Line 57:
==External links==
==External links==
{{commons category|The Indian Antiquary|''The Indian Antiquary''}}
{{commons category|The Indian Antiquary|''The Indian Antiquary''}}
* [https://archive.org/search.php?query=The%20Indian%20antiquary ''The Indian Antiquary'' at archive.org]
* [https://archive.org/search.php?query=The%20Indian%20antiquary ''The Indian Antiquary''] at the [[Internet Archive]]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Indian Antiquary, The}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Indian Antiquary, The}}
Line 36: Line 64:
[[Category:Numismatics journals]]
[[Category:Numismatics journals]]
[[Category:Archaeology journals]]
[[Category:Archaeology journals]]
[[Category:History of India]]
[[Category:Historiography of India]]
[[Category:Archaeology of India]]
[[Category:Archaeology of India]]
[[Category:Epigraphy]]
[[Category:Epigraphy]]
Line 43: Line 71:
[[Category:Ethnology]]
[[Category:Ethnology]]
[[Category:Languages of India]]
[[Category:Languages of India]]
[[Category:Philology]]
[[Category:Philology journals]]
[[Category:Anthropology journals]]
[[Category:Anthropology journals]]
[[Category:English-language journals]]
[[Category:English-language journals]]
[[Category:Indology journals]]
[[Category:Indology journals]]
[[Category:Philosophy journals]]
[[Category:Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland]]

Latest revision as of 08:02, 1 December 2024

The Indian Antiquary
Cover page of a 1931 edition of The Indian Antiquary
DisciplineNumismatics, Archaeology, Asian history, Folklore, Philology, Anthropology, Indology
LanguageEnglish
Publication details
History1872–1971
Publisher
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Indian Antiqu.
Indexing
ISSN0019-4395
OCLC no.891010482

The Indian Antiquary: A journal of oriental research in archaeology, history, literature, language, philosophy, religion, folklore, &c, &c (subtitle varies) was a journal of original research relating to India, published between 1872 and 1933. It was founded by the archaeologist James Burgess to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India and was notable for the high quality of its epigraphic illustrations which enabled scholars to make accurate translations of texts that in many cases remain the definitive versions to this day. It was also pioneering in its recording of Indian folklore. It was succeeded by The New Indian Antiquary (1938–47) and the Indian Antiquary (1964–71).

History

[edit]

The Indian Antiquary was founded in 1872 by the archaeologist James Burgess CIE as a journal of original research relating to India. It was designed to enable the sharing of knowledge between scholars based in Europe and in India.[1][2]

The journal was a private venture,[3] although no contributor or editor was ever paid for their work and the editors often had to support the publication out of their own pockets.[3] Burgess was the first editor and he continued in that role until the end of 1884 when failing eyesight forced him to hand over to John Faithfull Fleet and Richard Carnac Temple.[3]

The late nineteenth century was marked by a great increase in the number of local historical societies in India and a similar increase in the number of Indians who could speak and write English, to the extent that by the 1920s the entire journal could have been filled with work by Indian contributors.[4] Volumes for 1925 to 1932 were published under the authority of the Council of the Royal Anthropological Institute (1933, not).[5] The first incarnation of the Antiquary ceased publication in 1933 with volume 62, number 783 (Dec. 1933),[5] two years after Richard Temple's death in 1931 when it was edited by C. E. A. W. Oldham.[6] Several early volumes of the journal were reprinted by Swati Publications in Delhi, 1984.[7]

The New Indian Antiquary was published between 1938[8] and 1947, and the Indian Antiquary (described as the "third series") between 1964 and 1971.[9] (Volumes 14 to 62 of the original Antiquary were described as the "second series".)[10]

Content

[edit]

The journal had an archaeological and historical focus, and in the late nineteenth century that naturally meant that epigraphy (the study of inscriptions as writing rather than as literature) would be one of the principal subjects covered in its pages.[11] Indeed, the Antiquary was the premier source of European scholarship on Indian epigraphy until the twentieth century and the official Indian government journal of epigraphy, the Epigraphia Indica, was published as a quarterly supplement to the Antiquary between 1892 and 1920.[3]

The Antiquary was printed at Mazgaon, Bombay, by the Bombay Education Society and later the British India Press, but illustrations were produced in London by the firm of Griggs who were known for the accuracy of their work.[12] A high standard of reproduction was essential so that scholars could work on the epigraphic material without needing to see the originals.[12] Illustrations in the Antiquary were used by scholars such as Bhandarkar, Bhagvanlal Indraji, Georg Bühler, John Faithfull Fleet, Eggeling and B. Lewis Rice to decipher important inscriptions,[13] and in many cases their translations remain the definitive versions to this day.[11]

Over one thousand plates were included in The Indian Antiquary and the Epigraphia Indica over the first fifty years of publication, but having the illustrations produced abroad was not without its disadvantages. On one occasion during World War I, enemy action meant that expensive plates had to be sent from London three times before they reached Bombay safely.[12]

Another area where the Antiquary led was in recording folklore and folktales. Its publication of Punjab folktales was the first attempt to classify the events on which folk tales were based[4] and the pioneering work on north Indian folklore of William Crooke and Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube was printed in its pages.[14]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Prospectus Archived 30 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine in The Indian Antiquary, Part 1, 5 January 1872, p. 1.
  2. ^ "The Indian Antiquary" in The Antiquaries Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, April 1922, p. 148.
  3. ^ a b c d Temple, Richard Carnac. (1922) Fifty years of The Indian Antiquary. Mazgaon, Bombay: B. Miller, British India Press, pp. 3-4.
  4. ^ a b Temple, p. 7.
  5. ^ a b Indian antiquary. Archived 11 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine Suncat. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  6. ^ Enthoven, R. E. (2004). "Temple, Sir Richard Carnac, second baronet (1850–1931), army officer and oriental scholar". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Revised by Jones, M. G. M. (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/36453. Retrieved 10 January 2017. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  7. ^ The Indian Antiquary. Open Library. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
  8. ^ New Indian Antiquary. South Asia Archive, 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  9. ^ Indian Antiquary, British Library catalogue search, 29 May 2014.
  10. ^ Indian Antiquary, British Library catalogue search, 10 January 2017.
  11. ^ a b Salomon, Richard (1998) (10 December 1998). Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 219. ISBN 978-0-19-535666-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ a b c Temple, p. 6.
  13. ^ History, Archaeological Survey of India, 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  14. ^ "Introduction" by Sadhana Naithani in William Crooke; Pandit Ram Gharib Chaube (2002). Folktales from Northern India. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-57607-698-9.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to The Indian Antiquary.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_Indian_Antiquary&oldid=1260531850"