Talk:Réunion: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Savvyjack23 (talk | contribs) |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Réunion/Archive 2) (bot |
||
(42 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header|search=y}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Geography|class=C}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=Top|French Africa=yes|French Africa-importance=Top|AFR10k=yes}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Overseas France|importance=Top}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject France |
{{WikiProject France|importance=High}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Volcanoes|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Islands}} |
||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
{{V0.5|class=c|importance=mid|category=Geography}} |
|||
| algo = old(500d) |
|||
⚫ | |||
| counter = 2 |
|||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
| minthreadsleft = 1 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WPCD}} |
|||
== Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page == |
|||
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. |
|||
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. |
|||
This, however, doesn't necessaryily mean it's spam, or not a good link. |
|||
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist|request page for whitelisting]]. |
|||
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist|blacklist request page]]. |
|||
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the [[meta:Talk:Spam Blacklist|request page on meta]]. |
|||
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. |
|||
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. |
|||
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly. |
|||
'''Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:''' |
|||
*<nowiki>http://www.historyofnations.net/africa/reunion.html</nowiki> |
|||
*:''Triggered by <code>\bhistoryofnations\.net\b</code> on the local blacklist'' |
|||
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact [[User:Cyberpower678]] and ask him to program me with more info. |
|||
From your friendly hard working bot.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:arnprior">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 15:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::The rationale for blacklisting seems to be applicable to the link in question, so ... I took it out [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]]) 10:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
== Merge From [[Religion in Réunion]] == |
|||
As per [[WP:ATD-M]] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Alpha3031|Alpha3031]] ([[User talk:Alpha3031|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alpha3031|contribs]]) 11:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
I think you can just proceed with the merging. [[User:Dennis97519|dennis97519]] ([[User talk:Dennis97519|talk]]) 14:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
The merge gets my vote: there's just not enough material for a separte article, nor an apparent specific reason to keep it [[User:Fastifex|Fastifex]] ([[User talk:Fastifex|talk]]) 13:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Pronunciation in English == |
|||
Why doesn't this article have the English pronunciation? Is it /rɪ̈ˈjuːnjən/ (like the word reunion)? --[[Special:Contributions/81.147.66.100|81.147.66.100]] ([[User talk:81.147.66.100|talk]]) 22:52, 29 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Yep, pronounced identically to the English word "reunion". <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:IgnorantArmies|<font color="crimson">IgnorantArmies</font>]] [[User talk:IgnorantArmies|<font color="crimson">(talk)</font>]]'''</small> 06:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 == |
|||
I think that the recovery of items from that flight should be at least a by line on this page. Since the island is so small, this matter has in fact become part of its history. Any thoughts? --[[Special:Contributions/27.131.166.130|27.131.166.130]] ([[User talk:27.131.166.130|talk]]) 02:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{Top 25 Report|Jul 26 2015 (16th)|Aug 2 2015 (19th)}} |
|||
:No, it is not a relevant part of Réunion's history. All the information belongs in the article [[MH 370]]. --[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 06:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:No, it fails the ten year test, ([[WP:10YT]]). Ten years from the now the plane will have been found or the search will have been called off, but either way that some wreckage from a plane crash once washed up on an island will be of no consequence for an article about that island. [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 18:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== "Isle Bourbon" vs. "Isle de Bourbon" == |
|||
: Yes, I think it belongs in the article. Not a great deal, but perhaps one sentence or so. The missing plane is a huge international event that has lingered for over a year (and continues to linger). The finding of this debris is the first piece to solving (or helping to solve) one of the greatest international aviation mysteries of all time. So, yes, I think it's relevant and belongs in the article, at least a brief mention or so. [[User:Joseph A. Spadaro|Joseph A. Spadaro]] ([[User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro|talk]]) 06:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::The thing about great mysteries is that they're less interesting once they're solved. But, okay, I can agree with a sentence mentioning it. For a while, it will continue to re-appear anyway. [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 20:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:10-cent-1816-Isle-Bourbon.jpg|thumb|An 1816 ten-centime coin from Réunion, from when it was still called Isle Bourbon]] |
|||
== Réunion or Reunion in English? == |
|||
The picture of "An 1816 ten-centime coin from Réunion" clearly says it's "Isle de Bourbon", NOT "Isle Bourbon". |
|||
This Wikipedia article uses a shortened form ''Réunion'' of the French ''La Réunion''. Is there any reliable/verifiable source for this form in English? |
|||
Might someone who knows this history care to add a few words about this difference? |
|||
[http://www.france.fr/en/regions-and-cities/reunion-severe-island.html The English version of the "official website of France" (a website of the Government of France)] uses Reunion. Should this Wikipedia article use Reunion instead of Réunion, to match the French Government's preferred English name for its island? I suggest that this Wikipedia article should be changed to match what the French prefer to call the island in English (Reunion). [[User:Tidyupper|Tidyupper]] ([[User talk:Tidyupper|talk]]) 23:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't think we should interpret the French government website's preferred spelling as indicative of their preference for how it should be spelled in English. Here's a guideline on how Wikipedia articles get geographic place names: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28geographic_names%29], saying we usually use the most common English form, personally I'd oppose any page move proposal unless it's shown that this is actually harming the encyclopedia by making it difficult for people to find the article. [[User:Geogene|Geogene]] ([[User talk:Geogene|talk]]) 00:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
::It's a tossup in the English-language press: NY Times [http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/08/05/world/europe/ap-missing-malaysian-plane.html without accent], NY Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/03/world/africa/malaysia-airlines-flight-370-debris-investigation-reunion.html with accent], The Guardian [http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/aug/05/mh370-debris-reunion-investigation with], The Telegraph [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/reunionfrance/11777540/MH370-Has-wreckage-been-washing-up-on-Reunion-for-months.html without]... I personally prefer to leave it as Réunion because Reunion just looks overly translated. I doubt the French government really prefers it without accent, they probably just hired an overzealous translator. [[User:Vrac|Vrac]] ([[User talk:Vrac|talk]]) 00:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:::BBC=Reunion. CNN=Reunion. FCO=Réunion. As you say a toss-up but, for what it's worth, I'd guess its commonname is Reunion. Interestingly, there's another local official website that calls it ''Reunion'' - [http://www.univ-reunion.fr/university-of-reunion-island/ Université de la Réunion]. [[User:Bromley86|Bromley86]] ([[User talk:Bromley86|talk]]) 10:00, 8 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks to all who have brought this article to its current condition. [[User:DavidMCEddy|DavidMCEddy]] ([[User talk:DavidMCEddy|talk]]) 21:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::When in doubt, lets use other countries in a similar situation as a benchmark. ''Côte d'Ivoire,'' which is translated to [[Ivory Coast]] goes directly against the desire of the country to go by its official French-administered name. ''[[Haïti]]'' is also another example, however they do not attempt to enforce their spelling on the international community. [[User:Savvyjack23|Savvyjack23]] ([[User talk:Savvyjack23|talk]]) 01:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:42, 1 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Réunion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 16 months |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
"Isle Bourbon" vs. "Isle de Bourbon"
[edit]The picture of "An 1816 ten-centime coin from Réunion" clearly says it's "Isle de Bourbon", NOT "Isle Bourbon".
Might someone who knows this history care to add a few words about this difference?
Thanks to all who have brought this article to its current condition. DavidMCEddy (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Geography
- B-Class vital articles in Geography
- B-Class Africa articles
- Top-importance Africa articles
- B-Class French Africa articles
- Top-importance French Africa articles
- WikiProject French Africa articles
- Articles created or improved during the WikiProject Africa 10,000 Challenge
- WikiProject Africa articles
- B-Class Overseas France articles
- Top-importance Overseas France articles
- All WikiProject Overseas France pages
- B-Class France articles
- High-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- B-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- All WikiProject Volcanoes pages
- B-Class Islands articles
- WikiProject Islands articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report