User talk:Passengerpigeon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:21, 1 December 2024

This talk page is archived regularly.
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Passengerpigeon,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship

Hi, i would like to be mentored by you. CosmicRiter (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LTA case page

Hi. To save me searching for it, would you mind pointing me to the diff that supports this? Am also doubtful about its relevance. All the best. - Euryalus (talk) 04:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm, Seems like the origin is this? Am not convinced that this has sufficient relevance to be included on the case page, but as a compromise I've reworded the sentence to reflect their post rather than speculation on wider mental issues. Happy to discuss. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply; yes, that's what I was referring to, but I read it a long time ago and had trouble finding it again. Passenger pigeon (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese mountain chickadee

Hi. Where did you find “Chinese mountain chickadee” being used as an alternative common name for Poecile superciliosus? Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 15:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cremastra I created the redirect because of the line in the article that said it was sometimes considered a subspecies of the mountain chickadee. On second thought, perhaps the name isn't common enough to warrant a redirect. Passenger pigeon (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think to warrant a redirect, it would have to be actually used somewhere as a common name, which I'm not seeing. Cremastra (u — c) 15:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cremastra: Good point; I have tagged it for deletion. Perhaps I should have redirected Poecile gambeli superciliosus (the Latin name if it is treated as a subspecies) instead. Passenger pigeon (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Passengerpigeon. Thank you for your work on Poecile gambeli superciliosus. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

the middle word isn't mentioned at the target page. add it to the infobox with a ref please

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:35, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Canada bunting" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Canada bunting has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 28 § Canada bunting until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

U5 on User:DrPaulRosenfeld/sandbox; G11 on Draft:GazipurShaheen Cadet Academy

Hi Passengerpigeon -- Thanks for patrolling -- I've declined your U5 request on User:DrPaulRosenfeld/sandbox because it is clearly an attempt at an article draft, and while notability isn't currently demonstrated, it is at least possible under WP:PROF. Until we decide to prohibit autobiographies, rather than just strongly deprecating them, that is never a reason for deletion alone. I also declined your G11 on Draft:GazipurShaheen Cadet Academy because the promotion was restricted to two paragraphs that could easily be removed. Regards,

I understand; I tagged the sandbox for U5 in that case because of a combination of tone (it read strongly like a resume), its autobiographical nature, and the fact that the author hadn't contributed to Wikipedia outside of writing it. Passenger pigeon (talk) 14:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]