Jump to content

Talk:ATR 42: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Deemery (talk | contribs)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Aviation|class=C
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Aviation|B-Class-1=yes
<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
|B-Class-1=yes
<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=no
|B-Class-2=no
Line 12: Line 11:
|B-Class-5=yes
|B-Class-5=yes
|Aircraft-project=yes}}
|Aircraft-project=yes}}
{{WikiProject France}}
{{WikiProject France|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Italy|class=c|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Italy|importance=low}}
}}
}}


== list of former operators is incomplete ==
==Need a gallery==


Can someone make a photo gallery for all these photos? They're screwing up the section edit links something awful, and it looks kinda silly to have a giant column of photos running down the right side of the page.--'''[[User:Clawson|chris.]][[User talk:Clawson|lawson]]''' 20:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
I flew a lot on Continental Express flights from MHT to EWR around 1989-1992. What I don't know is the name of the actual owning entity. [[User:Deemery|Deemery]] ([[User talk:Deemery|talk]]) 00:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

:Note that this problem was solved with the article splits. - [[User:BillCJ|BillCJ]] 19:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

==Company==
In the article is not mentioned that ATR is an Italian French company, with the shares equally divided between Alenia and Aerospatiale (now EADS) --[[User:82.89.191.143|82.89.191.143]] 10:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

:And this is relevant to the article about the '''aircraft''' ATR 42 exactly how? There is an article on ATR as a company already. [[User:82.10.157.146|82.10.157.146]] 18:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

==Need Consistency in Engine Power Listings==
The article isn't consistent. In the text (ATR 42-200/300) it states the engines have 2000 shp, whereas the box at the bottom of the article lists those engines at 1800 shp. In the text (ATR 42-320) it states the engines for that variant have 2100 shp, whereas the box lists the engines at 1900 shp. In the text (ATR 42-500) it states the PW127E engines are rated at 2400 horsepower, whereas the box lists the engines at 2160 shp. In addition, the ''General Characteristics'' section (just above the box) lists the engine output as 1790 KW, which converts to 2400 horsepower.

Somebody should make the effort to find the correct rated power for each of the three engine types used in these three models. As a starting point, the [[Aviation Week & Space Technology]] issue for 29 October, 2007, p. 64 lists the engine power (for the ATR 42-500) at 2160 shp, so that is probably correct. Where did the 2400 shp number come from? Any help would be appreciated. [[User:Raymondwinn|Raymondwinn]] 08:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

These P&WC engines have a nominal power and a "reserve take-off" power, to be used if an engine failure occurs during take-off, which triggers the so-called "uptrim" on the remaining engine, a ~10% increase in torque. So the PW120, for example, has this RTO power rated at 2000 shp (threfore the "20" on its model name, PW120), but normally it is used at 1800 shp, which corresponds to 100% torque. The PW121 can go up to 2100 shp (therefore the "21") on RTO but normally is used at 1900 shp. For the PW127, this name rule does not apply because there are many sub-models. ATR42-500 use the PW127E but they can be fitted with PW127F as well; many of these PW127 can be retrofitted into different sub-models very easily. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.68.105.129|201.68.105.129]] ([[User talk:201.68.105.129|talk]]) 03:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==ATR42-300 specifications==

This article lacks specs for the 42-300. I'm not good at making wiki articles but if someone wants to format the below correctly that would be great.

MRM 17000KG
MTOM 16900KG
PAYLOAD 3006KG
MZFM 15540KG
MAX FUEL 4500KG
ZERO PAYLOAD RANGE 2300NM WITH RESERVES
ZERO PAYLOAD ENDURANCE 9:30 WITH RESERVES
FULL PAYLOAD RANGE 1800NM WITH RESERVES
FULL PAYLOAD ENDURANCE 6:00 WITH RESERVES

Thanks [[Special:Contributions/78.146.179.212|78.146.179.212]] ([[User talk:78.146.179.212|talk]]) 14:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

==Data Sheet==
I found an [http://www.iacc.gov.cu/Documentos%5Caeronavegabilidad%5CCertificadosAprobados%5CHOJAS%20DATOS%20ATR-42-500.pdf ATR 42 data sheet - Data Sheet No. 01-02 / 23.01.02] at [[Instituto de Aeronáutica Civil de Cuba]]
[[User:WhisperToMe|WhisperToMe]] ([[User talk:WhisperToMe|talk]]) 13:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

== Specifications ==

Is there any reason why we still have specs for the ATR-72 as it isn't part of the article any more? If not is there any reason why the article can't use a more normal specs template? [[User:Nigel Ish|Nigel Ish]] ([[User talk:Nigel Ish|talk]]) 14:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
:The same of course applies to the ATR 72 article.[[User:Nigel Ish|Nigel Ish]] ([[User talk:Nigel Ish|talk]]) 16:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

::I dont see any reason why the standard template cant be used (on both). [[User:MilborneOne|MilborneOne]] ([[User talk:MilborneOne|talk]]) 16:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

== Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page ==

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessaryily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist|request page for whitelisting]].
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist|blacklist request page]].
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the [[meta:Talk:Spam Blacklist|request page on meta]].
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

'''Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:'''

*<nowiki>http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/atr_42/</nowiki>
*:''Triggered by <code>\baerospace-technology\.com\b</code> on the local blacklist''

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact [[User:Cyberpower678]] and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:arnprior">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-6.1ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 10:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

{{done|Resolved}} This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]] [[User talk:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Notify]]<sub style="margin-left:-5.8ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">Online</sub> 19:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:38, 2 December 2024

list of former operators is incomplete

[edit]

I flew a lot on Continental Express flights from MHT to EWR around 1989-1992. What I don't know is the name of the actual owning entity. Deemery (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]