Talk:List of resurrected species: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 02:02, 2 December 2024

Extinction Mid‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tree of Life

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Can we get rid of this "Dire Wolf" project?

With the recent news that Dire wolves were quite distantly related to wolves & other canids. This project just seems rather superficial compared to other projects, which is using animals from the same species. Can't forget the environmental & conservation uses of these projects. To avoid an edit war, I hope to see any reason why this should be listed. Monsieur X (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selective breeding

The Selective breeding section should be removed. Neither the quagga, nor the aurochs nor the European wild horse have been "resurrected" by selective breeding. There is already a page for "breeding-back". DFoidl (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Over section

Please note WP:OVERSECTION. It is not normal to include subsection headings when a section only contains a single section with a single paragraph. If this article is not likely to be expanded anytime soon with more subsections then the excessive subheadings should be removed (or converted to hidden anchors). -- 193.178.96.170 (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should aurochs be added back to the list?

The comeback of the European icon | Rewilding Europe

Plan to bring giant tauros cattle from Netherlands to Scotland

Various aurochs back-breeding programmes have made significant progress, with Taurus Project/Rewilding Europe planning to release their backbreed aurochs into the wilds starting in 2025, and there are plans to reintroduce them to parts in the UK such as Scottland in 2026. Edelgardvonhresvelg (talk) 02:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
-{{WikiProject Extinction|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Extinction|importance=mid}}
+{{WikiProject Lists}}
+{{WikiProject Tree of Life}}
 }}
 == Can we get rid of this "Dire Wolf" project? ==
@@ Line 9: / Line 11: @@
 The Selective breeding section should be removed. Neither the quagga, nor the aurochs nor the European wild horse have been "resurrected" by selective breeding. There is already a page for "breeding-back". [[User:DFoidl|DFoidl]] ([[User talk:DFoidl|talk]]) 12:18, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
+== Over section ==
+Please note [[WP:OVERSECTION]]. It is not normal to include subsection headings when a section only contains a single section with a single paragraph. If this article is not likely to be expanded anytime soon with more subsections then the excessive subheadings should be removed (or converted to hidden anchors). -- [[Special:Contributions/193.178.96.170|193.178.96.170]] ([[User talk:193.178.96.170|talk]]) 12:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
+== Should aurochs be added back to the list? ==
+[https://rewildingeurope.com/news/the-comeback-of-the-european-icon/ The comeback of the European icon | Rewilding Europe]
+[https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cew17l2jzg4o?at_format=link&at_bbc_team=editorial Plan to bring giant tauros cattle from Netherlands to Scotland]
+Various aurochs back-breeding programmes have made significant progress, with Taurus Project/Rewilding Europe planning to release their backbreed aurochs into the wilds starting in 2025, and there are plans to reintroduce them to parts in the UK such as Scottland in 2026. [[User:Edelgardvonhresvelg|Edelgardvonhresvelg]] ([[User talk:Edelgardvonhresvelg|talk]]) 02:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)