Jump to content

Thom space: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
more tex
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
be a rank ''n'' [[real number|real]] [[vector bundle]] over the [[paracompact space]] ''B''. Then for each point ''b'' in ''B'', the [[Fiber (mathematics)#Fiber in naive set theory|fiber]] <math>E_b</math> is an ''n''-dimensional real [[vector space]]. We can form an ''n''-[[sphere bundle]] <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E) \to B</math> by taking the [[one-point compactification]] of each fiber and gluing them together to get the total space.{{Elucidate|What are the open sets of the new total space?|date=November 2014}} Finally, from the total space <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> we obtain the '''Thom space''' <math>T(E)</math> as the quotient of <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> by ''B''; that is, by identifying all the new points to a single point <math>\infty</math>, which we take as the [[Pointed space|basepoint]] of <math>T(E)</math>. If ''B'' is compact, then <math>T(E)</math> is the one-point compactification of ''E''.
be a rank ''n'' [[real number|real]] [[vector bundle]] over the [[paracompact space]] ''B''. Then for each point ''b'' in ''B'', the [[Fiber (mathematics)#Fiber in naive set theory|fiber]] <math>E_b</math> is an ''n''-dimensional real [[vector space]]. We can form an ''n''-[[sphere bundle]] <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E) \to B</math> by taking the [[one-point compactification]] of each fiber and gluing them together to get the total space.{{Elucidate|What are the open sets of the new total space?|date=November 2014}} Finally, from the total space <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> we obtain the '''Thom space''' <math>T(E)</math> as the quotient of <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> by ''B''; that is, by identifying all the new points to a single point <math>\infty</math>, which we take as the [[Pointed space|basepoint]] of <math>T(E)</math>. If ''B'' is compact, then <math>T(E)</math> is the one-point compactification of ''E''.


For example, if ''E'' is the trivial bundle <math>B\times \R^n</math>, then <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> is <math>B\times S^n</math> and, writing ''B''<sub>+</sub> for ''B'' with a disjoint basepoint, <math>T(E)</math> is the [[smash product]] of ''B''<sub>+</sub> and <math>S^n</math>; that is, the ''n''-th reduced [[suspension (topology)|suspension]] of ''B''<sub>+</sub>.
For example, if ''E'' is the trivial bundle <math>B\times \R^n</math>, then <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> is <math>B\times S^n</math> and, writing <math>B_+</math> for ''B'' with a disjoint basepoint, <math>T(E)</math> is the [[smash product]] of <math>B_+</math> and <math>S^n</math>; that is, the ''n''-th reduced [[suspension (topology)|suspension]] of <math>B_+</math>.


Alternatively, since ''B'' is paracompact, ''E'' can be given a Euclidean metric and then <math>T(E)</math> can be defined as the quotient of the unit disk bundle of ''E'' by the unit (''n''-1)-sphere bundle of ''E''.
Alternatively,{{fact|date=July 2024}} since ''B'' is paracompact, ''E'' can be given a Euclidean metric and then <math>T(E)</math> can be defined as the quotient of the unit disk bundle of ''E'' by the unit <math>(n-1)</math>-sphere bundle of ''E''.


==The Thom isomorphism==
==The Thom isomorphism==


The significance of this construction begins with the following result, which belongs to the subject of [[cohomology]] of fiber bundles. (We have stated the result in terms of <math>\Z_2</math> [[coefficients]] to avoid complications arising from [[orientability]]; see also [[Orientation of a vector bundle#Thom space]].)
The significance of this construction begins with the following result, which belongs to the subject of [[cohomology]] of [[fiber bundle]]s. (We have stated the result in terms of <math>\Z_2</math> [[coefficients]] to avoid complications arising from [[orientability]]; see also [[Orientation of a vector bundle#Thom space]].)


Let <math>p\colon E\to B</math> be a real vector bundle of rank ''n''. Then there is an isomorphism, now called a '''Thom isomorphism'''
Let <math>p: E\to B</math> be a real vector bundle of rank ''n''. Then there is an isomorphism called a '''Thom isomorphism'''
:<math>\Phi \colon H^k(B; \Z_2) \to \tilde{H}^{k+n}(T(E); \Z_2),</math>
:<math>\Phi : H^k(B; \Z_2) \to \widetilde{H}^{k+n}(T(E); \Z_2),</math>
for all ''k'' greater than or equal to 0, where the [[Left-hand side and right-hand side of an equation|right hand side]] is [[reduced cohomology]].
for all ''k'' greater than or equal to 0, where the [[Left-hand side and right-hand side of an equation|right hand side]] is [[reduced cohomology]].


This theorem was formulated and proved by [[René Thom]] in his famous 1952 thesis.
This theorem was formulated and proved by [[René Thom]] in his famous 1952 thesis.


We can interpret the theorem as a global generalization of the suspension isomorphism on local trivializations, because the Thom space of a trivial bundle on ''B'' of rank ''k'' is isomorphic to the ''k''th suspension of ''B''<sub>+</sub>, ''B'' with a disjoint point added (cf. [[#Construction of the Thom space]].) This can be more easily seen in the formulation of the theorem that does not make reference to Thom space:
We can interpret the theorem as a global generalization of the suspension isomorphism on local trivializations, because the Thom space of a trivial bundle on ''B'' of rank ''k'' is isomorphic to the ''k''th suspension of <math>B_+</math>, ''B'' with a disjoint point added (cf. [[#Construction of the Thom space]].) This can be more easily seen in the formulation of the theorem that does not make reference to Thom space:


{{math_theorem|name=Thom isomorphism|Let <math>\Lambda</math> be a ring and <math>p\colon E\to B</math> be an [[oriented bundle|oriented]] real vector bundle of rank ''n''. Then there exists a class
{{math_theorem|name=Thom isomorphism|
Let <math>\Lambda</math> be a ring and <math>p: E\to B</math> be an [[oriented bundle|oriented]] real vector bundle of rank ''n''. Then there exists a class
:<math>u \in H^n(E, E \setminus B; \Lambda),</math>
:<math>u \in H^n(E, E \setminus B; \Lambda),</math>
where ''B'' is embedded into ''E'' as a zero section, such that for any fiber ''F'' the restriction of ''u''
where ''B'' is embedded into ''E'' as a zero section, such that for any fiber ''F'' the restriction of ''u''
:<math>u|_{(F, F \setminus 0)} \in H^n(F, F \setminus 0; \Lambda)</math>
:<math>u|_{(F, F \setminus 0)} \in H^n(F, F \setminus 0; \Lambda)</math>
is the class induced by the orientation of ''F''. Moreover,
is the class induced by the orientation of ''F''. Moreover,
:<math>H^k(E; \Lambda) \to H^{k+n}(E, E \setminus B; \Lambda), \, x \mapsto x \smile u</math>
:<math>\begin{cases} H^k(E; \Lambda) \to H^{k+n}(E, E \setminus B; \Lambda) \\ x \longmapsto x \smile u \end{cases}</math>
is an isomorphism.
is an isomorphism.
}}
}}


In concise terms, the last part of the theorem says that ''u'' freely generates <math>H^*(E, E \setminus B; \Lambda)</math> as a right <math>H^*(E; \Lambda)</math>-module. The class ''u'' is usually called the '''Thom class''' of ''E''. Since the pullback <math>p^*\colon H^*(B; \Lambda) \to H^*(E; \Lambda)</math> is a [[ring isomorphism]], Φ is given by the equation:
In concise terms, the last part of the theorem says that ''u'' freely generates <math>H^*(E, E \setminus B; \Lambda)</math> as a right <math>H^*(E; \Lambda)</math>-module. The class ''u'' is usually called the '''Thom class''' of ''E''. Since the pullback <math>p^*: H^*(B; \Lambda) \to H^*(E; \Lambda)</math> is a [[ring isomorphism]], <math>\Phi</math> is given by the equation:

:<math>\Phi(b) = p^*(b) \smile u.</math>
:<math>\Phi(b) = p^*(b) \smile u.</math>

In particular, the Thom isomorphism sends the [[identity (mathematics)|identity]] element of <math>H^*(B)</math> to ''u''. Note: for this formula to make sense, ''u'' is treated as an element of (we drop the ring Λ)
:<math>\tilde{H}^n(T(E)) = H^n(\operatorname{Sph}(E), B) \simeq H^n(E, E \setminus B).</math><ref>Proof of the isomorphism. We can embed ''B'' into <math>Sph(E)</math> either as the zero section; i.e., a section at zero vector or as the infinity section; i.e., a section at infinity vector (topologically the difference is immaterial.) Using two ways of embedding we have the triple:
In particular, the Thom isomorphism sends the [[identity (mathematics)|identity]] element of <math>H^*(B)</math> to ''u''. Note: for this formula to make sense, ''u'' is treated as an element of (we drop the ring <math>\Lambda</math>)
:<math>\tilde{H}^n(T(E)) = H^n(\operatorname{Sph}(E), B) \simeq H^n(E, E \setminus B).</math><ref>Proof of the isomorphism. We can embed ''B'' into <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E)</math> either as the zero section; i.e., a section at zero vector or as the infinity section; i.e., a section at infinity vector (topologically the difference is immaterial.) Using two ways of embedding we have the triple:
:<math>(Sph(E), Sph(E) - B, B)</math>.
:<math>(\operatorname{Sph}(E), \operatorname{Sph}(E) \setminus B, B)</math>.
Clearly, <math>Sph(E) - B</math> deformation-retracts to ''B''. Taking the long exact sequence of this triple, we then see:
Clearly, <math>\operatorname{Sph}(E) \setminus B</math> deformation-retracts to ''B''. Taking the long exact sequence of this triple, we then see:

:<math>H^n(Sph(E), B) \simeq H^n(Sph(E), Sph(E) - B)</math>,
:<math>H^n(Sph(E), B) \simeq H^n(\operatorname{Sph}(E), \operatorname{Sph}(E) \setminus B),</math>

the latter of which is isomorphic to:
the latter of which is isomorphic to:

:<math>H^n(E, E - B)</math>
:<math>H^n(E, E \setminus B)</math>

by excision.</ref><!-- I can't understand this:
by excision.</ref><!-- I can't understand this:
Note: for this formula to make sense, ''u'' is treated as an element of <math>H^k(D(E),\operatorname{Sph}(E);\mathbf{Z}_2)\cong \tilde H^k(T(E);\mathbf{Z}_2)</math>, where <math>D(E)</math> is the associated disk bundle, so we have a cup product
Note: for this formula to make sense, ''u'' is treated as an element of <math>H^k(D(E),\operatorname{Sph}(E);\Z_2)\cong \tilde H^k(T(E);\Z_2)</math>, where <math>D(E)</math> is the associated disk bundle, so we have a cup product

:<math>H^i(D(E);\mathbf{Z}_2)\otimes H^k(D(E),\operatorname{Sph}(E);\mathbf{Z}_2)\to H^{i+k}(D(E),\operatorname{Sph}(E);\mathbf{Z}_2)\cong \tilde H^k(T(E);\mathbf{Z}_2)</math>.-->
:<math>H^i(D(E);\Z_2)\otimes H^k(D(E),\operatorname{Sph}(E);\Z_2)\to H^{i+k}(D(E),\operatorname{Sph}(E);\Z_2)\cong \tilde H^k(T(E);\Z_2)</math>.-->

The standard reference for the Thom isomorphism is the book by Bott and Tu.


==Significance of Thom's work==
==Significance of Thom's work==
Line 52: Line 63:


If the Steenrod operations are available, we can use them and the isomorphism of the theorem to construct the Stiefel–Whitney classes. Recall that the Steenrod operations (mod 2) are [[natural transformation]]s
If the Steenrod operations are available, we can use them and the isomorphism of the theorem to construct the Stiefel–Whitney classes. Recall that the Steenrod operations (mod 2) are [[natural transformation]]s

:<math>Sq^i \colon H^m(-; \mathbf{Z}_2) \to H^{m+i}(-; \mathbf{Z}_2),</math>
:<math>Sq^i : H^m(-; \Z_2) \to H^{m+i}(-; \Z_2),</math>
defined for all nonnegative integers ''m''. If ''i'' = ''m'', then ''Sq<sup>i</sup>'' coincides with the cup square. We can define the ''i''th Stiefel-Whitney class ''w''<sub>''i''</sub> (''p'') of the vector bundle ''p'' : ''E'' → ''B'' by:

:<math>w_i(p) = \Phi^{-1}(Sq^i(\Phi(1))) = \Phi^{-1}(Sq^i(u)).\,</math>
defined for all nonnegative integers ''m''. If <math>i=m</math>, then <math>Sq^i</math> coincides with the cup square. We can define the ''i''th Stiefel–Whitney class <math>w_i(p)</math> of the vector bundle <math>p: E\to B</math> by:

:<math>w_i(p) = \Phi^{-1}(Sq^i(\Phi(1))) = \Phi^{-1}(Sq^i(u)).</math>


==Consequences for differentiable manifolds==
==Consequences for differentiable manifolds==


If we take the bundle in the above to be the [[tangent bundle]] of a smooth manifold, the conclusion of the above is called the [[Wu formula]], and has the following strong consequence: since the Steenrod operations are invariant under homotopy equivalence, we conclude that the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a manifold are as well. This is an extraordinary result that does not generalize to other characteristic classes. There exists a similar famous and difficult result establishing topological invariance for rational [[Pontryagin classes]], due to [[Sergei Novikov (mathematician)|Sergei Novikov]].
If we take the bundle in the above to be the [[tangent bundle]] of a smooth manifold, the conclusion of the above is called the [[Wu formula]], and has the following strong consequence: since the Steenrod operations are invariant under homotopy equivalence, we conclude that the Stiefel–Whitney classes of a manifold are as well. This is an extraordinary result that does not generalize to other characteristic classes. There exists a similar famous and difficult result establishing topological invariance for rational [[Pontryagin classes]], due to [[Sergei Novikov (mathematician)|Sergei Novikov]].


==Thom spectrum==
==Thom spectrum==

By definition, the '''Thom spectrum''' is a sequence of Thom spaces
=== Real cobordism ===
There are two ways to think about bordism: one as considering two <math>n</math>-manifolds <math>M,M'</math> are cobordant if there is an <math>(n+1)</math>-manifold with boundary <math>W</math> such that

:<math>\partial W = M \coprod M'</math>

Another technique to encode this kind of information is to take an embedding <math>M \hookrightarrow \R^{N + n}</math> and considering the normal bundle

:<math>\nu: N_{\R^{N+n}/M} \to M</math>

The embedded manifold together with the isomorphism class of the normal bundle actually encodes the same information as the cobordism class <math>[M]</math>. This can be shown<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=|title=Thom's theorem| url=https://sites.math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/3thom.pdf| url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210117195051/https://sites.math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/3thom.pdf|archive-date=17 Jan 2021|access-date=|website=}}</ref> by using a cobordism <math>W</math> and finding an embedding to some <math>\R^{N_W + n}\times [0,1]</math> which gives a homotopy class of maps to the Thom space <math>MO(n)</math> defined below. Showing the isomorphism of

:<math>\pi_nMO \cong \Omega^O_n</math>

requires a little more work.<ref>{{Cite web| last=| first=| date=| title=Transversality |url= https://sites.math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/4transversality.pdf | url-status=live|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210117200636/https://sites.math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/4transversality.pdf |archive-date=17 Jan 2021|access-date=|website=}}</ref>

=== Definition of Thom spectrum ===
By definition, the '''Thom spectrum'''<ref>See pp. 8-9 in {{cite arXiv|last=Greenlees|first=J. P. C.|date=2006-09-15|title=Spectra for commutative algebraists|eprint=math/0609452}}</ref> is a sequence of Thom spaces

:<math>MO(n) = T(\gamma^n)</math>
:<math>MO(n) = T(\gamma^n)</math>

where we wrote γ<sup>n</sup> →''BO''(''n'') for the [[universal vector bundle]] of rank ''n''. The sequence forms a [[spectrum (topology)|spectrum]].<ref>http://math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/2cobordism.pdf</ref> A theorem of Thom says that <math>\pi_* MO</math> is the unoriented [[cobordism ring]];<ref>{{harvnb|Stong|loc=pp. 18}}</ref> the proof of this theorem relies crucially on [[Transversality theorem|Thom’s transversality theorem]].<ref>http://math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/4transversality.pdf</ref> The lack of transversality prevents from computing cobordism rings of, say, [[topological manifold]]s from Thom spectra.
where we wrote <math>\gamma^n\to BO(n)</math> for the [[universal vector bundle]] of rank ''n''. The sequence forms a [[spectrum (topology)|spectrum]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/2cobordism.pdf|title=Math 465, lecture 2: cobordism|first=J.|last=Francis|others=Notes by O. Gwilliam|publisher=Northwestern University}}</ref> A theorem of Thom says that <math>\pi_*(MO)</math> is the unoriented [[cobordism ring]];<ref>{{harvnb|Stong|1968|loc=p. 18}}</ref> the proof of this theorem relies crucially on [[Transversality theorem|Thom’s transversality theorem]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/classes/mflds/4transversality.pdf|title=Math 465, lecture 4: transversality|first=J.|last=Francis|others=Notes by I. Bobovka|publisher=Northwestern University}}</ref> The lack of transversality requires that alternative methods be found to compute cobordism rings of, say, [[topological manifold]]s from Thom spectra.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 75: Line 108:


==References==
==References==
* {{cite journal |first=Dennis |last=Sullivan |authorlink=Dennis Sullivan |title=René Thom's Work on Geometric Homology and Bordism |journal=[[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society]] |volume=41 |issue=3 |year=2004 |pages=341–350 |doi=10.1090/S0273-0979-04-01026-2 }}
* {{cite journal |first=Dennis |last=Sullivan |author-link=Dennis Sullivan |title=René Thom's Work on Geometric Homology and Bordism |journal=[[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society]] |volume=41 |issue=3 |year=2004 |pages=341–350 |doi=10.1090/S0273-0979-04-01026-2 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book |authorlink=Raoul Bott |first=Raoul |last=Bott |first2=Loring |last2=Tu |title=Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology |location=New York |publisher=Springer |year=1982 |isbn=0-387-90613-4 }} A classic reference for [[differential topology]], treating the link to [[Poincaré duality]] and the [[Euler class]] of [[Sphere bundle]]s
* {{cite book |author-link=Raoul Bott |first1=Raoul |last1=Bott |first2=Loring |last2=Tu |title=Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology |location=New York |publisher=Springer |year=1982 |isbn=0-387-90613-4 }} A classic reference for [[differential topology]], treating the link to [[Poincaré duality]], [[Euler class]] of [[Sphere bundle]]s, Thom classes and Thom isomorphism, and more.
* {{cite book |author-link=John Milnor |first1=John |last1=Milnor| title=Characteristic classes }} is another standard reference for the Thom class and Thom isomorphism. See especially the paragraph 18.
* {{cite book |first=J. Peter |last=May |authorlink=J. Peter May |title=A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology |location= |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |year=1999 |pages=183–198 |isbn=0-226-51182-0 }}
* {{cite book |first=J. Peter |last=May |author-link=J. Peter May |title=A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |year=1999 |pages=183–198 |isbn=0-226-51182-0 }} This textbook gives a detailed construction of the Thom class for trivial vector bundles, and also formulates the theorem in case of arbitrary vector bundles.
* {{cite web |url=https://mathoverflow.net/questions/7375/explanation-for-the-thom-pontryagin-construction-and-its-generalisations |title=Explanation for the Pontryagin–Thom construction |work=[[MathOverflow]] }}
* {{cite book |first=Robert E.|last= Stong |authorlink=Robert Evert Stong| title=Notes on cobordism theory |publisher= [[Princeton University Press]] |year=1968 }}
* {{cite book |first=Robert E.|last= Stong |author-link=Robert Evert Stong| title=Notes on cobordism theory |publisher= [[Princeton University Press]] |year=1968 }}
* {{cite journal |first=René |last=Thom |authorlink=René Thom|title=[[List of important publications in mathematics#Quelques propriétés globales des variétés differentiables|Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables]] |journal=[[Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici]] |volume=28 |year=1954 |pages=17–86 }}
* {{cite journal |first=René |last=Thom |author-link=René Thom|title=[[List of important publications in mathematics#Quelques propriétés globales des variétés differentiables|Quelques propriétés globales des variétés différentiables]] |journal=[[Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici]] |volume=28 |year=1954 |pages=17–86 |doi=10.1007/BF02566923 |s2cid=120243638 }}
* {{cite journal |title=Units of ring spectra and Thom spectra |arxiv= 0810.4535 |first = Matthew |last = Ando|first2 = Andrew J.|last2 = Blumberg|first3 = David J.|last3 = Gepner|first4 = Michael J.|last4 = Hopkins|author4-link=Michael J. Hopkins| first5 = Charles|last5 = Rezk |journal=[[Journal of Topology]] |volume= 7 |year=2014|issue= 4|pages=1077–1117|doi=10.1112/jtopol/jtu009| mr=286898 }}
* {{cite journal |title=Units of ring spectra and Thom spectra |arxiv= 0810.4535 |first1 = Matthew |last1 = Ando|first2 = Andrew J.|last2 = Blumberg|first3 = David J.|last3 = Gepner|first4 = Michael J.|last4 = Hopkins|author4-link=Michael J. Hopkins| first5 = Charles|last5 = Rezk |journal=[[Journal of Topology]] |volume= 7 |year=2014|issue= 4|pages=1077–1117|doi=10.1112/jtopol/jtu009| mr=286898 |s2cid= 119613530 }}


==External links==
==External links==
*http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Thom+spectrum
*http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Thom+spectrum
* {{springer|title=Thom space|id=p/t092680}}
* {{springer|title=Thom space|id=p/t092680}}
* Akhil Mathew's blog posts: https://amathew.wordpress.com/tag/thom-space/


[[Category:Algebraic topology]]
[[Category:Algebraic topology]]

Latest revision as of 18:16, 2 December 2024

In mathematics, the Thom space, Thom complex, or Pontryagin–Thom construction (named after René Thom and Lev Pontryagin) of algebraic topology and differential topology is a topological space associated to a vector bundle, over any paracompact space.

Construction of the Thom space

[edit]

One way to construct this space is as follows. Let

be a rank n real vector bundle over the paracompact space B. Then for each point b in B, the fiber is an n-dimensional real vector space. We can form an n-sphere bundle by taking the one-point compactification of each fiber and gluing them together to get the total space.[further explanation needed] Finally, from the total space we obtain the Thom space as the quotient of by B; that is, by identifying all the new points to a single point , which we take as the basepoint of . If B is compact, then is the one-point compactification of E.

For example, if E is the trivial bundle , then is and, writing for B with a disjoint basepoint, is the smash product of and ; that is, the n-th reduced suspension of .

Alternatively,[citation needed] since B is paracompact, E can be given a Euclidean metric and then can be defined as the quotient of the unit disk bundle of E by the unit -sphere bundle of E.

The Thom isomorphism

[edit]

The significance of this construction begins with the following result, which belongs to the subject of cohomology of fiber bundles. (We have stated the result in terms of coefficients to avoid complications arising from orientability; see also Orientation of a vector bundle#Thom space.)

Let be a real vector bundle of rank n. Then there is an isomorphism called a Thom isomorphism

for all k greater than or equal to 0, where the right hand side is reduced cohomology.

This theorem was formulated and proved by René Thom in his famous 1952 thesis.

We can interpret the theorem as a global generalization of the suspension isomorphism on local trivializations, because the Thom space of a trivial bundle on B of rank k is isomorphic to the kth suspension of , B with a disjoint point added (cf. #Construction of the Thom space.) This can be more easily seen in the formulation of the theorem that does not make reference to Thom space:

Thom isomorphism —  Let be a ring and be an oriented real vector bundle of rank n. Then there exists a class

where B is embedded into E as a zero section, such that for any fiber F the restriction of u

is the class induced by the orientation of F. Moreover,

is an isomorphism.

In concise terms, the last part of the theorem says that u freely generates as a right -module. The class u is usually called the Thom class of E. Since the pullback is a ring isomorphism, is given by the equation:

In particular, the Thom isomorphism sends the identity element of to u. Note: for this formula to make sense, u is treated as an element of (we drop the ring )

[1]

The standard reference for the Thom isomorphism is the book by Bott and Tu.

Significance of Thom's work

[edit]

In his 1952 paper, Thom showed that the Thom class, the Stiefel–Whitney classes, and the Steenrod operations were all related. He used these ideas to prove in the 1954 paper Quelques propriétés globales des variétés differentiables that the cobordism groups could be computed as the homotopy groups of certain Thom spaces MG(n). The proof depends on and is intimately related to the transversality properties of smooth manifolds—see Thom transversality theorem. By reversing this construction, John Milnor and Sergei Novikov (among many others) were able to answer questions about the existence and uniqueness of high-dimensional manifolds: this is now known as surgery theory. In addition, the spaces MG(n) fit together to form spectra MG now known as Thom spectra, and the cobordism groups are in fact stable. Thom's construction thus also unifies differential topology and stable homotopy theory, and is in particular integral to our knowledge of the stable homotopy groups of spheres.

If the Steenrod operations are available, we can use them and the isomorphism of the theorem to construct the Stiefel–Whitney classes. Recall that the Steenrod operations (mod 2) are natural transformations

defined for all nonnegative integers m. If , then coincides with the cup square. We can define the ith Stiefel–Whitney class of the vector bundle by:

Consequences for differentiable manifolds

[edit]

If we take the bundle in the above to be the tangent bundle of a smooth manifold, the conclusion of the above is called the Wu formula, and has the following strong consequence: since the Steenrod operations are invariant under homotopy equivalence, we conclude that the Stiefel–Whitney classes of a manifold are as well. This is an extraordinary result that does not generalize to other characteristic classes. There exists a similar famous and difficult result establishing topological invariance for rational Pontryagin classes, due to Sergei Novikov.

Thom spectrum

[edit]

Real cobordism

[edit]

There are two ways to think about bordism: one as considering two -manifolds are cobordant if there is an -manifold with boundary such that

Another technique to encode this kind of information is to take an embedding and considering the normal bundle

The embedded manifold together with the isomorphism class of the normal bundle actually encodes the same information as the cobordism class . This can be shown[2] by using a cobordism and finding an embedding to some which gives a homotopy class of maps to the Thom space defined below. Showing the isomorphism of

requires a little more work.[3]

Definition of Thom spectrum

[edit]

By definition, the Thom spectrum[4] is a sequence of Thom spaces

where we wrote for the universal vector bundle of rank n. The sequence forms a spectrum.[5] A theorem of Thom says that is the unoriented cobordism ring;[6] the proof of this theorem relies crucially on Thom’s transversality theorem.[7] The lack of transversality requires that alternative methods be found to compute cobordism rings of, say, topological manifolds from Thom spectra.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Proof of the isomorphism. We can embed B into either as the zero section; i.e., a section at zero vector or as the infinity section; i.e., a section at infinity vector (topologically the difference is immaterial.) Using two ways of embedding we have the triple:
    .
    Clearly, deformation-retracts to B. Taking the long exact sequence of this triple, we then see:
    the latter of which is isomorphic to:
    by excision.
  2. ^ "Thom's theorem" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 Jan 2021.
  3. ^ "Transversality" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 Jan 2021.
  4. ^ See pp. 8-9 in Greenlees, J. P. C. (2006-09-15). "Spectra for commutative algebraists". arXiv:math/0609452.
  5. ^ Francis, J. "Math 465, lecture 2: cobordism" (PDF). Notes by O. Gwilliam. Northwestern University.
  6. ^ Stong 1968, p. 18
  7. ^ Francis, J. "Math 465, lecture 4: transversality" (PDF). Notes by I. Bobovka. Northwestern University.

References

[edit]
[edit]