Talk:LG15: The Last: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (Low): banner shell, +Television, +Australia (Rater) |
|||
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{oldafdmulti |
|||
{{oldafdfull|page=LG15: The Last|date=3 August 2009|result='''keep'''}} |
|||
| date = August 3 2008 |
|||
| result = '''Keep''' |
|||
| page = LG15: The Last |
|||
| date2 = August 12 2009 |
|||
| result2 = '''Do not merge into lonelygirl15''' |
|||
| link2 = https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Talk:LG15:_The_Last#Merge |
|||
| date3 = September 13 2009 |
|||
| result3 = '''Speedy keep''' |
|||
| page3 = LG15: The Last (2nd nomination) |
|||
| date4 = September 15, 2009 |
|||
| result4 = '''Endorse Speedy Keep''' |
|||
| link4 = https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_September_15 |
|||
| caption4 = DRV |
|||
| collapse = no |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Television |importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Australia |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Merge == |
== Merge == |
||
{{Discussion top|1=The result was '''do not merge''' into [[Lonelygirl15]]. -- [[User:Milowent|Milowent]] ([[User talk:Milowent|talk]]) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)}} |
|||
This article should now be merged with [[Lonelygirl15]] as we still don't have any actual third-party non-trivial sources about 'The Last' show. |
This article should now be merged with [[Lonelygirl15]] as we still don't have any actual third-party non-trivial sources about 'The Last' show. |
||
Line 9: | Line 29: | ||
::::Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--[[User:Otterathome|Otterathome]] ([[User talk:Otterathome|talk]]) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
::::Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--[[User:Otterathome|Otterathome]] ([[User talk:Otterathome|talk]]) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::::Geez, you are such a turdbucket, Otter. You write as if you are the sole owner of wikipedia. My understanding is that the result of the Lg15: The Last AfD was KEEP, despite these exact same arguments. --[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] ([[User talk:Milowent|talk]]) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
:::::Geez, you are such a turdbucket, Otter. You write as if you are the sole owner of wikipedia. My understanding is that the result of the Lg15: The Last AfD was KEEP, despite these exact same arguments. --[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] ([[User talk:Milowent|talk]]) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
::::::I do not believe that this article should be merged. It is, in itself, independent from that of LonelyGirl15. It was created by fans, for fans. --[[User:Gwenavere14|Gwenavere14]] ([[User talk:Gwenavere14|talk]]) |
|||
:::::::With only one person in support of merge, and this proposal hanging out there for more than 3 weeks now, it appears appropriate to close this discussion at this time. --[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] ([[User talk:Milowent|talk]]) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:12, 3 December 2024
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was do not merge into Lonelygirl15. -- Milowent (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
This article should now be merged with Lonelygirl15 as we still don't have any actual third-party non-trivial sources about 'The Last' show.
- I respectuflly disagree. This option was just discussed in the AfD that just ended, and the result was keep. But I am going to work on substantive improvements of lg15 related articles now instead of engaging in these debates more. Cheers. --Milowent (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails WP:N so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. KindredPhantom (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--Otterathome (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Geez, you are such a turdbucket, Otter. You write as if you are the sole owner of wikipedia. My understanding is that the result of the Lg15: The Last AfD was KEEP, despite these exact same arguments. --Milowent (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- I do not believe that this article should be merged. It is, in itself, independent from that of LonelyGirl15. It was created by fans, for fans. --Gwenavere14 (talk)
- With only one person in support of merge, and this proposal hanging out there for more than 3 weeks now, it appears appropriate to close this discussion at this time. --Milowent (talk) 13:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I do not believe that this article should be merged. It is, in itself, independent from that of LonelyGirl15. It was created by fans, for fans. --Gwenavere14 (talk)
- Geez, you are such a turdbucket, Otter. You write as if you are the sole owner of wikipedia. My understanding is that the result of the Lg15: The Last AfD was KEEP, despite these exact same arguments. --Milowent (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Feel free to make a portal. I'll give you until next month to find more sources so it passes our guidelines, otherwise it will have to be merged or deleted, I don't mind which.--Otterathome (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- What about renegade's idea in the deletion discussion about a LG15 portal style page? Also, Otterathome the result was to keep the article, so just drop it about deleting the article. KindredPhantom (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well if you are unable to find any third-party non-trivial sources about it then it fails WP:N so the relevant 'competition' information can be merged. If you don't think a merge is feasible with the current amount of sources then I guess it will have to be deleted.--Otterathome (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)