Talk:Pete Hoekstra: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 07:10, 3 December 2024

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan High‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pete Hoekstra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it Piet? Or, is it Pieter?

The article gives many conflicting spellings of the subject's name. The introductory lead sentence and the infobox say Pieter, but the main body text says Piet. Not only that, the ordering is different, with Piet/Pieter being given as a middle name in some places and as a first name in others. This should be fixed and unified so that it is uniform across the article. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs),

Peter

Does anyone know why government sources such as the Department of State and the US Embassy in the Netherlands refer to him as "Peter"? That's not his birthname (Cornelis Pieter) and not his commonly used name (Pete). It seems justified that Peter Hoekstra redirects here based on that, but it's confusing as the article doens't use Peter anywhere. Lennart97 (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Hoekstra, Pete|1=
-{{WPBS|1=
+{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low}}
-{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=c|priority=|activepol=yes|listas=Hoekstra, Pete}}
-{{Project Congress|class=c|importance=}}
+{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}}
-{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=c|importance=}}
+{{WikiProject International relations|importance=low}}
-{{WikiProject Michigan|class=c|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Michigan|importance=high}}
+{{WikiProject Netherlands}}
+{{WikiProject Politics|importance=low|American=yes|American-importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|importance=|subject=person}}
 }}
+{{User:MiszaBot/config
+|archiveheader       = {{talkarchivenav}}
+|maxarchivesize      = 75K
+|counter             = 1
+|minthreadsleft      = 3
+|minthreadstoarchive = 1
+|algo                = old(28d)
+|archive             = Talk:Pete Hoekstra/Archive %(counter)d
+}}
+{{Archives|search=yes}}
-== WMDs NY Times ==
+== External links modified ==
-On November 3, 2006, The New York Times reported that a website created at the request of Hoekstra and senator Pat Roberts was found to contain detailed information which could help nuclear states produce nuclear weapons. The website was shut down on November 2 following questioning by the Times and protests by International Atomic Energy Agency officials. Jamal Ware, a spokesman for Hoekstra, said complaints about the site "didn’t sound like a big deal .... We were a little surprised when they pulled the plug" ([7]).
-This section appears not to make sense. It says, 'On Nov 3rd the NY times Reported that a website was up' then it says, 'The Website was shut down Nov 2nd.'
-Please Correct. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/66.93.119.157|66.93.119.157]] ([[User talk:66.93.119.157|talk]]) 16:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->
-== Peter Hoekstra (footballer) ==
+Hello fellow Wikipedians,
-It seems this guy would be more known as "Pete Hoekstra" whereas the footballer is definitely "Peter", therefore should [[Peter Hoekstra]] really link to this guy? [[Special:Contributions/86.163.117.242|86.163.117.242]] ([[User talk:86.163.117.242|talk]]) 23:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
+I have just modified 2 external links on [[Pete Hoekstra]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/812720974|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
-== Possible Twitter account? ==
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080219053940/http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00004155 to http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?CID=N00004155&cycle=2006
+*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218135915/http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/black-ministers-join-critics-who-say-hoekstras-broken-english-ad-is-racially-insensitive/2012/02/06/gIQAPblltQ_story.html to https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/black-ministers-join-critics-who-say-hoekstras-broken-english-ad-is-racially-insensitive/2012/02/06/gIQAPblltQ_story.html
+When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
-I can't confirm but believe this is his [[twitter]] account: http://twitter.com/petehoekstra . Needs to be verified.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.174.2.159|71.174.2.159]] ([[User talk:71.174.2.159|talk]]) 20:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
-==Superbowl ad controversy==
-I understand that it doesn't necessarily need a subsection of its own, but if all you are going to do is edit it into a garbled sentence which is nonsensical and confusing, then just leave it alone for god's sake.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/184.157.240.154|184.157.240.154]] ([[User talk:184.157.240.154|talk]]) 18:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
-:I'm not going to claim I'm the world's greatest expert on wiki coding, but the "Super Bowl" section of the article is chock full of mangled POV references....added notes that have to with 30 year old issues not related to the controversy itself and notes like "Hoekstra voted for trillions in deficit spending"....meaning, he voted in favor of passing a budget.  These things are not directly related to what happened.  Basically, the controversy adds up to this:  A bunch of people who don't like Hoekstra anyway, either were offended, or pretended to be offended by something he showed on TV.  Other than that, there isn't much to it.[[Special:Contributions/64.222.94.115|64.222.94.115]] ([[User talk:64.222.94.115|talk]]) 04:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
-::So, you think the whole section should go? [[User:Gobonobo|<font face="DejaVu Sans" color="333300">Gobonobo</font>]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|<sup>T</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|<sup>C</sup>]] 07:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
-:::No, not at all.  I think that an ad came out that people apparently feel strongly about, and THAT is the controversy.  If the ad brings back 1980's car smashing, that's relevant.  If an Asian man got attacked in 1982, it isn't.  The ad talks about the opponent's spending record, but the CONTROVERSY is about the chinese character, not the spending, so no matter who talks about Hoekstra's spending record or voting record is not relevant to the issue at hand...leave that to a section on the voting itself.  What the controversy section turns into, rather than describing the ad or its reaction, is ...."Not only is Hoekstra RACIST, BUT...!!!!", which is not that point.
+== Is it Piet? Or, is it Pieter? ==
+The article gives many conflicting spellings of the subject's name. The introductory lead sentence and the infobox say Pieter, but the main body text says Piet. Not only that, the ordering is different, with Piet/Pieter being given as a middle name in some places and as a first name in others. This should be fixed and unified so that it is uniform across the article. – <span style="font-family: Georgia;">'''''[[User:Illegitimate Barrister|Illegitimate Barrister]]'''''</span> ([[User_talk:Illegitimate_Barrister|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Illegitimate Barrister|contribs]]),
+== Peter ==
+Does anyone know why government sources such as the Department of State and the US Embassy in the Netherlands refer to him as "Peter"? That's not his birthname (Cornelis Pieter) and not his commonly used name (Pete). It seems justified that [[Peter Hoekstra]] redirects here based on that, but it's confusing as the article doens't use Peter anywhere. [[User:Lennart97|Lennart97]] ([[User talk:Lennart97|talk]]) 12:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
-{{unindent}}'''Split'''
-I think that the [[Pete Hoekstra 2012 Superbowl advertisement in Michigan]] should have its own wikipedia page.  The advertisement has been reviewed by [[Countdown with Keith Olberman]], [[The Young Turks]] and other media outlets.--[[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 00:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
-:'''Oppose''' Don't think it meets notability criteria for separate article. There's been a spate of coverage since it actually aired (less than a week ago), but it seems likely that it will be reduced to a footnote in the overall campaign. If it becomes a central, defining issue in the campaign, (e.g., [[Macaca_(term)]]), there will be time enough to revisit and split into its own article. [[User:SS451|SS451]] ([[User talk:SS451|talk]]) 03:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)