Jump to content

List of multiple discoveries: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
16th century: uppercase per proper name and Wikipedia style (Earth)
19th century: Clean up/copyedit
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


Merton contrasted a "multiple" with a "singleton"—a discovery that has been made uniquely by a single scientist or group of scientists working together.<ref>[[Robert K. Merton]], ''On Social Structure and Science'', p. 307.</ref>
Merton contrasted a "multiple" with a "singleton"—a discovery that has been made uniquely by a single scientist or group of scientists working together.<ref>[[Robert K. Merton]], ''On Social Structure and Science'', p. 307.</ref>

The distinction may blur as science becomes increasingly collaborative.<ref>[[Sarah Lewin Frasier]] and [[Jen Christiansen]], "Nobel Connections: A deep dive into science's greatest prize", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 331, no. 3 (October 2024), pp. 72–73.</ref>


A distinction is drawn between a [[Discovery (observation)|discovery]] and an [[invention]], as discussed for example by [[Logology (science of science)#Discoveries and inventions|Bolesław Prus]].<ref>[[Bolesław Prus]], ''O odkryciach i wynalazkach'' ([[s:On Discoveries and Inventions|On Discoveries and Inventions]]): A Public Lecture Delivered on 23 March 1873 by Aleksander Głowacki [Bolesław Prus], Passed by the [Russian] Censor (Warsaw, 21 April 1873), Warsaw, Printed by F. Krokoszyńska, 1873, p. 12.</ref> However, discoveries and inventions are inextricably related, in that discoveries lead to inventions, and inventions facilitate discoveries; and since the same phenomenon of [[multiple discovery|multiplicity]] occurs in relation to both discoveries and inventions, this article lists both multiple discoveries and multiple ''inventions''.
A distinction is drawn between a [[Discovery (observation)|discovery]] and an [[invention]], as discussed for example by [[Logology (science of science)#Discoveries and inventions|Bolesław Prus]].<ref>[[Bolesław Prus]], ''O odkryciach i wynalazkach'' ([[s:On Discoveries and Inventions|On Discoveries and Inventions]]): A Public Lecture Delivered on 23 March 1873 by Aleksander Głowacki [Bolesław Prus], Passed by the [Russian] Censor (Warsaw, 21 April 1873), Warsaw, Printed by F. Krokoszyńska, 1873, p. 12.</ref> However, discoveries and inventions are inextricably related, in that discoveries lead to inventions, and inventions facilitate discoveries; and since the same phenomenon of [[multiple discovery|multiplicity]] occurs in relation to both discoveries and inventions, this article lists both multiple discoveries and multiple ''inventions''.
Line 29: Line 31:
* 1520: [[Scipione dal Ferro]] (1520) and [[Niccolò Tartaglia]] (1535) independently developed a method for solving [[Cubic equation#Cardano's method|cubic equations]].
* 1520: [[Scipione dal Ferro]] (1520) and [[Niccolò Tartaglia]] (1535) independently developed a method for solving [[Cubic equation#Cardano's method|cubic equations]].
* [[Olbers' paradox]] (the "dark-night-sky paradox") was described by [[Thomas Digges]] in the 16th century, by [[Johannes Kepler]] in the 17th century (1610), by [[Edmond Halley]] and by [[Jean-Philippe de Chéseaux]] in the 18th century, by [[Heinrich Wilhelm Matthias Olbers]] in the 19th century (1823), and definitively by [[William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin|Lord Kelvin]] in the 20th century (1901); some aspects of Kelvin's argument had been anticipated in the poet and short-story writer [[Edgar Allan Poe]]'s essay, ''[[Eureka: A Prose Poem]]'' (1848), which also presaged by three-quarters of a century the [[Big Bang]] theory of the [[universe]].<ref name="auto">{{cite journal |last=Cappi |first=Alberto |date=1994 |title=Edgar Allan Poe's Physical Cosmology |journal=Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=35 |pages=177–192 |bibcode=1994QJRAS..35..177C}}</ref><ref>* {{cite journal |last=Rombeck |first=Terry |date=22 January 2005 |title=Poe's little-known science book reprinted |journal=Lawrence Journal-World & News |url= http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/jan/22/poes_littleknown_science/}}</ref><ref>[[Marilynne Robinson]], "On Edgar Allan Poe", ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXII, no. 2 (5 February 2015), pp. 4, 6.</ref>
* [[Olbers' paradox]] (the "dark-night-sky paradox") was described by [[Thomas Digges]] in the 16th century, by [[Johannes Kepler]] in the 17th century (1610), by [[Edmond Halley]] and by [[Jean-Philippe de Chéseaux]] in the 18th century, by [[Heinrich Wilhelm Matthias Olbers]] in the 19th century (1823), and definitively by [[William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin|Lord Kelvin]] in the 20th century (1901); some aspects of Kelvin's argument had been anticipated in the poet and short-story writer [[Edgar Allan Poe]]'s essay, ''[[Eureka: A Prose Poem]]'' (1848), which also presaged by three-quarters of a century the [[Big Bang]] theory of the [[universe]].<ref name="auto">{{cite journal |last=Cappi |first=Alberto |date=1994 |title=Edgar Allan Poe's Physical Cosmology |journal=Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society |volume=35 |pages=177–192 |bibcode=1994QJRAS..35..177C}}</ref><ref>* {{cite journal |last=Rombeck |first=Terry |date=22 January 2005 |title=Poe's little-known science book reprinted |journal=Lawrence Journal-World & News |url= http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/jan/22/poes_littleknown_science/}}</ref><ref>[[Marilynne Robinson]], "On Edgar Allan Poe", ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXII, no. 2 (5 February 2015), pp. 4, 6.</ref>
* 1596: [[Continental drift]], in varying independent [[iteration]]s, was proposed by [[Abraham Ortelius]] {{Harv|Ortelius|1596}},<ref>{{Citation |last=Romm |first=James |title=A New Forerunner for Continental Drift |journal=Nature |date=3 February 1994 |volume=367 |pages=407–408 |doi=10.1038/367407a0 |postscript=. |issue=6462 |bibcode=1994Natur.367..407R |s2cid=4281585}}</ref> Theodor Christoph Lilienthal (1756),<ref name=schmeling2004>{{Cite web |first=Harro |last=Schmeling |url= http://www.geophysik.uni-frankfurt.de/~schmelin/skripte/Geodynn1-kap1-2-S1-S22-2004.pdf |title=Geodynamik |date=2004 |publisher=University of Frankfurt |language=de}}</ref> [[Alexander von Humboldt]] (1801 and 1845),<ref name=schmeling2004 /> [[Antonio Snider-Pellegrini]] {{Harv|Snider-Pellegrini|1858}}, [[Alfred Russel Wallace]],<ref>{{citation |first=Alfred Russel |last=Wallace |title=Darwinism ... |date=1889 |chapter=12 |publisher=Macmillan |page=341 |chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=0S4aAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA341}}</ref> [[Charles Lyell]],<ref>{{citation |first=Charles |last=Lyell |title=Principles of Geology ... |date=1872 |edition=11th |publisher=John Murray |page=258 |url= https://archive.org/stream/principlesgeolo41lyelgoog#page/n287/mode/1up/}}</ref> Franklin Coxworthy (between 1848 and 1890),<ref>{{cite book |last1=Coxworthy |first1=Franklin |title=Electrical Condition; Or, How and where Our Earth was Created |date=1924 |publisher=J. S. Phillips |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=STj7PAAACAAJ |access-date=6 December 2014}}</ref> [[Roberto Mantovani]] (between 1889 and 1909), [[William Henry Pickering]] (1907),<ref>{{Citation |last=Pickering |first=W. H |title=The Place of Origin of the Moon – The Volcani Problems |journal=Popular Astronomy |volume=15 |pages=274–287 |date=1907 |bibcode=1907PA.....15..274P}},</ref> [[Frank Bursley Taylor]] (1908),<ref>{{cite journal |first=Frank |last=Bursley Taylor |date=3 June 1910 |url= http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101080758822;view=1up;seq=207 |title=Bearing of the Tertiary mountain belt on the origin of the earth’s plan |journal=Bulletin of the Geological Society of America |volume=21 |pages=179–226}}</ref> and [[Alfred Wegener]] (1912).<ref name=weg>{{Citation |last=Wegener |first=Alfred |date=6 January 1912 |title=Die Herausbildung der Grossformen der Erdrinde (Kontinente und Ozeane), auf geophysikalischer Grundlage |journal=Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen |volume=63 |pages=185–195, 253–256, 305–309 |url= http://epic.awi.de/Publications/Polarforsch2005_1_3.pdf |postscript=. |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20111004001150/http://epic.awi.de/Publications/Polarforsch2005_1_3.pdf |archive-date=4 October 2011}}</ref> In addition, in 1885 [[Eduard Suess]] had proposed a supercontinent [[Gondwana]]<ref>Eduard Suess, ''Das Antlitz der Erde'' (The Face of the Earth), vol. 1 (Leipzig, (Germany): G. Freytag, 1885), [http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015048893047;view=1up;seq=792 page 768.] From p. 768: ''"Wir nennen es Gondwána-Land, nach der gemeinsamen alten Gondwána-Flora, … "'' (We name it Gondwána-Land, after the common ancient flora of Gondwána ... )</ref> and in 1893 the [[Tethys Ocean]],<ref>{{cite journal |first=Edward |last=Suess |date=March 1893 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=yQUVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA180 |via=Google Books |title=Are ocean depths permanent? |journal=Natural Science: A Monthly Review of Scientific Progress |volume=2 |pages=180–187 |quote=This ocean we designate by the name 'Tethys', after the sister and consort of Oceanus. The latest successor of the Tethyan Sea is the present Mediterranean.}}</ref> assuming a [[Land bridge#Land bridge theory|land-bridge]] between the present continents submerged in the form of a [[geosyncline]]; and in 1895 [[John Perry (engineer)|John Perry]] had written a paper proposing that the Earth's interior was fluid, and disagreeing with [[Lord Kelvin]] on the age of the Earth.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Perry |first=John |date=1895 |title=On the age of the earth |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=51 |url= http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015038750868;view=1up;seq=266 |via=Hathi Trust |pages=224–227, 341–342, 582–585}}</ref>
* 1596: [[Continental drift]], in varying independent [[iteration]]s, was proposed by [[Abraham Ortelius]] {{Harv|Ortelius|1596}},<ref>{{Citation |last=Romm |first=James |title=A New Forerunner for Continental Drift |journal=Nature |date=3 February 1994 |volume=367 |pages=407–408 |doi=10.1038/367407a0 |postscript=. |issue=6462 |bibcode=1994Natur.367..407R |s2cid=4281585}}</ref> Theodor Christoph Lilienthal (1756),<ref name=schmeling2004>{{Cite web |first=Harro |last=Schmeling |url= http://www.geophysik.uni-frankfurt.de/~schmelin/skripte/Geodynn1-kap1-2-S1-S22-2004.pdf |title=Geodynamik |date=2004 |publisher=University of Frankfurt |language=de}}</ref> [[Alexander von Humboldt]] (1801 and 1845),<ref name=schmeling2004 /> [[Antonio Snider-Pellegrini]] {{Harv|Snider-Pellegrini|1858}}, [[Alfred Russel Wallace]],<ref>{{citation |first=Alfred Russel |last=Wallace |title=Darwinism ... |date=1889 |chapter=12 |publisher=Macmillan |page=341 |chapter-url= https://books.google.com/books?id=0S4aAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA341}}</ref> [[Charles Lyell]],<ref>{{citation |first=Charles |last=Lyell |title=Principles of Geology ... |date=1872 |edition=11th |publisher=John Murray |page=258 |url= https://archive.org/stream/principlesgeolo41lyelgoog#page/n287/mode/1up/}}</ref> Franklin Coxworthy (between 1848 and 1890),<ref>{{cite book |last1=Coxworthy |first1=Franklin |title=Electrical Condition; Or, How and where Our Earth was Created |date=1924 |publisher=J. S. Phillips |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=STj7PAAACAAJ |access-date=6 December 2014}}</ref> [[Roberto Mantovani]] (between 1889 and 1909), [[William Henry Pickering]] (1907),<ref>{{Citation |last=Pickering |first=W. H |title=The Place of Origin of the Moon – The Volcani Problems |journal=Popular Astronomy |volume=15 |pages=274–287 |date=1907 |bibcode=1907PA.....15..274P}},</ref> [[Frank Bursley Taylor]] (1908),<ref>{{cite journal |first=Frank |last=Bursley Taylor |date=3 June 1910 |url= http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101080758822;view=1up;seq=207 |title=Bearing of the Tertiary mountain belt on the origin of the earth's plan |journal=Bulletin of the Geological Society of America |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=179–226|doi=10.1130/GSAB-21-179 |bibcode=1910GSAB...21..179T }}</ref> and [[Alfred Wegener]] (1912).<ref name=weg>{{Citation |last=Wegener |first=Alfred |date=6 January 1912 |title=Die Herausbildung der Grossformen der Erdrinde (Kontinente und Ozeane), auf geophysikalischer Grundlage |journal=Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen |volume=63 |pages=185–195, 253–256, 305–309 |url= http://epic.awi.de/Publications/Polarforsch2005_1_3.pdf |postscript=. |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20111004001150/http://epic.awi.de/Publications/Polarforsch2005_1_3.pdf |archive-date=4 October 2011}}</ref> In addition, in 1885 [[Eduard Suess]] had proposed a supercontinent [[Gondwana]]<ref>Eduard Suess, ''Das Antlitz der Erde'' (The Face of the Earth), vol. 1 (Leipzig, (Germany): G. Freytag, 1885), [http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015048893047;view=1up;seq=792 page 768.] From p. 768: ''"Wir nennen es Gondwána-Land, nach der gemeinsamen alten Gondwána-Flora, … "'' (We name it Gondwána-Land, after the common ancient flora of Gondwána ... )</ref> and in 1893 the [[Tethys Ocean]],<ref>{{cite journal |first=Edward |last=Suess |date=March 1893 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=yQUVAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA180 |via=Google Books |title=Are ocean depths permanent? |journal=Natural Science: A Monthly Review of Scientific Progress |volume=2 |pages=180–187 |quote=This ocean we designate by the name 'Tethys', after the sister and consort of Oceanus. The latest successor of the Tethyan Sea is the present Mediterranean.}}</ref> assuming a [[Land bridge#Land bridge theory|land-bridge]] between the present continents submerged in the form of a [[geosyncline]]; and in 1895 [[John Perry (engineer)|John Perry]] had written a paper proposing that the Earth's interior was fluid, and disagreeing with [[Lord Kelvin]] on the age of the Earth.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Perry |first=John |date=1895 |title=On the age of the earth |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=51 |url= http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015038750868;view=1up;seq=266 |via=Hathi Trust |pages=224–227, 341–342, 582–585}}</ref>


== 17th century ==
== 17th century ==
Line 52: Line 54:
* 1749: [[Lightning rod]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Benjamin Franklin]] (1749) and [[Prokop Diviš]] (1754) (debated: Diviš's apparatus is assumed to have been more effective than Franklin's lightning rods in 1754, but was intended for a different purpose than lightning protection).
* 1749: [[Lightning rod]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Benjamin Franklin]] (1749) and [[Prokop Diviš]] (1754) (debated: Diviš's apparatus is assumed to have been more effective than Franklin's lightning rods in 1754, but was intended for a different purpose than lightning protection).
* 1756: [[Law of conservation of matter]]{{spaced ndash}}discovered by [[Mikhail Lomonosov]], 1756;<ref>Vladimir D. Shiltsev, "Nov. 19, 1771: Birth of Mikhail Lomonosov, Russia's first modern scientist", ''APS [American Physical Society] News'', November 2011 (vol. 20, no. 10) [https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201111/physicshistory.cfm].</ref> and independently by [[Antoine Lavoisier]], 1778.<ref>Anirudh, "10 Major Contributions of Antoine Lavoisier", 17 October 2017 [https://learnodo-newtonic.com/antoine-lavoisier-contributions].</ref>
* 1756: [[Law of conservation of matter]]{{spaced ndash}}discovered by [[Mikhail Lomonosov]], 1756;<ref>Vladimir D. Shiltsev, "Nov. 19, 1771: Birth of Mikhail Lomonosov, Russia's first modern scientist", ''APS [American Physical Society] News'', November 2011 (vol. 20, no. 10) [https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201111/physicshistory.cfm].</ref> and independently by [[Antoine Lavoisier]], 1778.<ref>Anirudh, "10 Major Contributions of Antoine Lavoisier", 17 October 2017 [https://learnodo-newtonic.com/antoine-lavoisier-contributions].</ref>
* 1773: [[Oxygen]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Carl Wilhelm Scheele]] ([[Uppsala]], 1773), [[Joseph Priestley]] ([[Wiltshire]], 1774). The term was coined by [[Antoine Lavoisier]] (1777). [[Michael Sendivogius]] ({{lang-pl|Michał Sędziwój}}; 1566–1636) is claimed as an earlier discoverer of oxygen.<ref>{{Cite web |url= http://www.masonic.benemerito.net/msricf/papers/marples/marples-michael.sendivogius.pdf |title=MICHAEL SENDIVOGIUS, ROSICRUCIAN, and FATHER OF STUDIES OF OXYGEN}}</ref>
* 1773: [[Oxygen]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Carl Wilhelm Scheele]] ([[Uppsala]], 1773), [[Joseph Priestley]] ([[Wiltshire]], 1774). The term was coined by [[Antoine Lavoisier]] (1777). [[Michael Sendivogius]] ({{langx|pl|Michał Sędziwój}}; 1566–1636) is claimed as an earlier discoverer of oxygen.<ref>{{Cite web |url= http://www.masonic.benemerito.net/msricf/papers/marples/marples-michael.sendivogius.pdf |title=MICHAEL SENDIVOGIUS, ROSICRUCIAN, and FATHER OF STUDIES OF OXYGEN}}</ref>
* 1783: [[Black hole|Black-hole]] theory{{spaced ndash}}[[John Michell]], in a 1783 paper in ''[[The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]]'', wrote: "If the semi-diameter of a sphere of the same density as the Sun in the proportion of five hundred to one, and by supposing light to be attracted by the same force in proportion to its [mass] with other bodies, all light emitted from such a body would be made to return towards it, by its own proper gravity."<ref>[http://www.astronomyedinburgh.org/publications/journals/39/blackholes.html Alan Ellis, "Black Holes{{spaced ndash}}Part 1{{spaced ndash}}History", Astronomical Society of Edinburgh, Journal 39, 1999] {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171006004950/http://www.astronomyedinburgh.org/publications/journals/39/blackholes.html |date=6 October 2017}}. A description of Michell's theory of black holes.</ref> A few years later, a similar idea was suggested independently by [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]].<ref name="Time, Bantam 1996, pp. 43–45">[[Stephen Hawking]], ''A Brief History of Time'', Bantam, 1996, pp. 43–45.</ref>
* 1783: [[Black hole|Black-hole]] theory{{spaced ndash}}[[John Michell]], in a 1783 paper in ''[[The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society]]'', wrote: "If the semi-diameter of a sphere of the same density as the Sun in the proportion of five hundred to one, and by supposing light to be attracted by the same force in proportion to its [mass] with other bodies, all light emitted from such a body would be made to return towards it, by its own proper gravity."<ref>[http://www.astronomyedinburgh.org/publications/journals/39/blackholes.html Alan Ellis, "Black Holes{{spaced ndash}}Part 1{{spaced ndash}}History", Astronomical Society of Edinburgh, Journal 39, 1999] {{Webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171006004950/http://www.astronomyedinburgh.org/publications/journals/39/blackholes.html |date=6 October 2017}}. A description of Michell's theory of black holes.</ref> A few years later, a similar idea was suggested independently by [[Pierre-Simon Laplace]].<ref name="Time, Bantam 1996, pp. 43–45">[[Stephen Hawking]], ''A Brief History of Time'', Bantam, 1996, pp. 43–45.</ref>
* 1798: [[Malthusian catastrophe]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Thomas Robert Malthus]] (1798), [[Hong Liangji]] (1793).<ref>"Hong's essential insight is the same as Malthus's". [[Wm Theodore de Bary]], ''Sources of East Asian Tradition'', vol. 2: ''The Modern Period'', New York, Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 85.</ref>
* 1798: [[Malthusian catastrophe]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Thomas Robert Malthus]] (1798), [[Hong Liangji]] (1793).<ref>"Hong's essential insight is the same as Malthus's". [[Wm Theodore de Bary]], ''Sources of East Asian Tradition'', vol. 2: ''The Modern Period'', New York, Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 85.</ref>
Line 78: Line 80:
* [[Dandelin–Gräffe method]], [[List of acronyms and initialisms: A#AK|aka]] Lobachevsky method{{spaced ndash}}an [[algorithm]] for finding multiple roots of a [[polynomial]], developed independently by [[Germinal Pierre Dandelin]], [[Karl Heinrich Gräffe]], and [[Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky]].
* [[Dandelin–Gräffe method]], [[List of acronyms and initialisms: A#AK|aka]] Lobachevsky method{{spaced ndash}}an [[algorithm]] for finding multiple roots of a [[polynomial]], developed independently by [[Germinal Pierre Dandelin]], [[Karl Heinrich Gräffe]], and [[Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky]].
* 1837: [[Electrical telegraph]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Charles Wheatstone]] (England, 1837), [[Samuel F.B. Morse]] (United States, 1837).
* 1837: [[Electrical telegraph]]{{spaced ndash}}[[Charles Wheatstone]] (England, 1837), [[Samuel F.B. Morse]] (United States, 1837).
* [[First law of thermodynamics]]{{spaced ndash}}In the late 19th century, various scientists independently stated that energy and matter are persistent, although this was later to be disregarded under subatomic conditions. [[Hess's Law]] ([[Germain Hess]]), [[Julius Robert von Mayer]], and [[James Joule]] were some of the first.
* [[First law of thermodynamics]]{{spaced ndash}}In the late 19th century, various scientists independently stated that energy and matter are persistent, although this was later to be disregarded under subatomic conditions. [[Hess's law]] ([[Germain Hess]]), [[Julius Robert von Mayer]], and [[James Joule]] were some of the first.
* 1846: [[Urbain Le Verrier]] and [[John Couch Adams]], studying [[Uranus]]'s orbit, independently proved that another, farther planet must exist. [[Neptune]] was found at the predicted moment and position.<ref name="Natarajan; Stern & Grinspoon; Morton">[[Priyamvada Natarajan]], "In Search of Planet X" (review of [[Dale P. Cruikshank]] and William Sheehan, ''Discovering Pluto: Exploration at the Edge of the Solar System'', University of Arizona Press, 475 pp.; [[Alan Stern]] and [[David Grinspoon]], ''[[Chasing New Horizons]]: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto'', Picador, 295 pp.; and [[Adam Morton]], ''Should We Colonize Other Planets?'', Polity, 122 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXVI, no. 16 (24 October 2019), pp. 39–41. (p. 39.)</ref>{{efn|[[Priyamvada Natarajan]] notes that, while Le Verrier and Adams "shared credit for the discovery [of [[Neptune]]] until fairly recently&nbsp;... historians of science [have] revealed that while Adams did perform some interesting calculations, his were not as precise or as accurate as Le Verrier's, and, moreover, he had not published his work, while Le Verrier had shared his predictions." Le Verrier "presented the calculated position of th[e] unseen planet [Neptune] to the [[French Academy of Sciences]] in Paris on August 31, 1846, barely two days before Adams mailed his own solution to the [[astronomer royal]], [[George Airy]], at the [[Greenwich Observatory]] so that his calculations could be checked. Neither Adams nor Le Verrier knew that the other had been researching [[Uranus]]'s orbit." Natarajan also notes that, "Though [[Neptune]] wasn't properly identified until 1846, it had been observed much earlier.": by [[Galileo Galilei]] (1612, 1613); by Michel Lalande (8 and 10 May 1795), nephew and pupil of French astronomer [[Joseph-Jérôme Lalande]]; by Scottish astronomer John Lambert, while working at the Munich Observatory in 1845 and 1846; and by [[James Challis]] (4 and 12 August 1846).<ref name="Natarajan; Stern & Grinspoon; Morton" />}}
* 1846: [[Urbain Le Verrier]] and [[John Couch Adams]], studying [[Uranus]]'s orbit, independently proved that another, farther planet must exist. [[Neptune]] was found at the predicted moment and position.<ref name="Natarajan; Stern & Grinspoon; Morton">[[Priyamvada Natarajan]], "In Search of Planet X" (review of [[Dale P. Cruikshank]] and William Sheehan, ''Discovering Pluto: Exploration at the Edge of the Solar System'', University of Arizona Press, 475 pp.; [[Alan Stern]] and [[David Grinspoon]], ''[[Chasing New Horizons]]: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto'', Picador, 295 pp.; and [[Adam Morton]], ''Should We Colonize Other Planets?'', Polity, 122 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXVI, no. 16 (24 October 2019), pp. 39–41. (p. 39.)</ref>{{efn|[[Priyamvada Natarajan]] notes that, while Le Verrier and Adams "shared credit for the discovery [of [[Neptune]]] until fairly recently&nbsp;... historians of science [have] revealed that while Adams did perform some interesting calculations, his were not as precise or as accurate as Le Verrier's, and, moreover, he had not published his work, while Le Verrier had shared his predictions." Le Verrier "presented the calculated position of th[e] unseen planet [Neptune] to the [[French Academy of Sciences]] in Paris on August 31, 1846, barely two days before Adams mailed his own solution to the [[astronomer royal]], [[George Airy]], at the [[Greenwich Observatory]] so that his calculations could be checked. Neither Adams nor Le Verrier knew that the other had been researching [[Uranus]]'s orbit." Natarajan also notes that, "Though [[Neptune]] wasn't properly identified until 1846, it had been observed much earlier.": by [[Galileo Galilei]] (1612, 1613); by Michel Lalande (8 and 10 May 1795), nephew and pupil of French astronomer [[Joseph-Jérôme Lalande]]; by Scottish astronomer John Lambert, while working at the Munich Observatory in 1845 and 1846; and by [[James Challis]] (4 and 12 August 1846).<ref name="Natarajan; Stern & Grinspoon; Morton" />}}
* 1851: [[Bessemer Process]]{{spaced ndash}}The process of removing impurities from steel on an industrial level using oxidation, developed in 1851 by American [[William Kelly (inventor)|William Kelly]] and independently developed and patented in 1855 by eponymous Englishman [[Henry Bessemer|Sir Henry Bessemer]].
* 1851: [[Bessemer Process]]{{spaced ndash}}The process of removing impurities from steel on an industrial level using oxidation, developed in 1851 by American [[William Kelly (inventor)|William Kelly]] and independently developed and patented in 1855 by eponymous Englishman [[Henry Bessemer|Sir Henry Bessemer]].
Line 142: Line 144:
* 1908: [[Frequency-hopping spread spectrum#Origins|Frequency-hopping spread spectrum]] in radio work was described by [[Johannes Zenneck]] (1908), [[Leonard Danilewicz]] (1929),<ref>[[Władysław Kozaczuk]], ''Enigma: How the German Machine Cipher Was Broken, and How It Was Read by the Allies in World War II'', edited and translated by [[Christopher Kasparek]], Frederick, Maryland, University Publications of America, 1984, {{ISBN|0-89093-547-5}}, p. 27.</ref> [[Willem Broertjes]] (1929), and [[Hedy Lamarr]] and [[George Antheil]] (1942 US patent).
* 1908: [[Frequency-hopping spread spectrum#Origins|Frequency-hopping spread spectrum]] in radio work was described by [[Johannes Zenneck]] (1908), [[Leonard Danilewicz]] (1929),<ref>[[Władysław Kozaczuk]], ''Enigma: How the German Machine Cipher Was Broken, and How It Was Read by the Allies in World War II'', edited and translated by [[Christopher Kasparek]], Frederick, Maryland, University Publications of America, 1984, {{ISBN|0-89093-547-5}}, p. 27.</ref> [[Willem Broertjes]] (1929), and [[Hedy Lamarr]] and [[George Antheil]] (1942 US patent).
* 1911: [[Ejnar Hertzsprung]] created the [[Hertzsprung–Russell diagram]], abbreviated ''H–R diagram'', ''HR diagram'', or ''HRD'' – a [[scatter plot]] of [[star]]s showing the relationship between the stars' [[absolute magnitude]]s or [[luminosity|luminosities]] versus their [[stellar classification]]s or [[effective temperature]]s – a major step toward an understanding of [[stellar evolution]]. In 1913 the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram was independently created by [[Henry Norris Russell]].
* 1911: [[Ejnar Hertzsprung]] created the [[Hertzsprung–Russell diagram]], abbreviated ''H–R diagram'', ''HR diagram'', or ''HRD'' – a [[scatter plot]] of [[star]]s showing the relationship between the stars' [[absolute magnitude]]s or [[luminosity|luminosities]] versus their [[stellar classification]]s or [[effective temperature]]s – a major step toward an understanding of [[stellar evolution]]. In 1913 the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram was independently created by [[Henry Norris Russell]].
* 1912-1917: [[Alexander Bogdanov]] formulated principles such as [[feedback]], [[dynamic equilibrium]], [[synergy]], and the [[theory of constraints]] under the transdisciplinary framework of "[[tektology]]". A number of very similar approaches were founded by [[Ludwig von Bertalanffy]] ([[general systems theory]], 1950s), Hermann Schmidt (''allgemeine Regelkreislehre'' (universal science of feedback, 1930s), [[Ștefan Odobleja]] (''psychologie consonantiste'', 1936) and [[Norbert Wiener]] ([[cybernetics]], 1945).
* By 1913, [[vitamin A]] was independently discovered by [[Elmer McCollum]] and [[Marguerite Davis]] at the [[University of Wisconsin–Madison]], and by [[Lafayette Mendel]] and [[Thomas Burr Osborne (chemist)|Thomas Burr Osborne]] at [[Yale University]], who studied the role of fats in the diet.
* By 1913, [[vitamin A]] was independently discovered by [[Elmer McCollum]] and [[Marguerite Davis]] at the [[University of Wisconsin–Madison]], and by [[Lafayette Mendel]] and [[Thomas Burr Osborne (chemist)|Thomas Burr Osborne]] at [[Yale University]], who studied the role of fats in the diet.
* 1915: [[Bacteriophage]]s ([[virus]]es that infect [[bacteria]]){{spaced ndash}}[[Frederick Twort]] (1915), [[Félix d'Hérelle]] (1917).
* 1915: [[Bacteriophage]]s ([[virus]]es that infect [[bacteria]]){{spaced ndash}}[[Frederick Twort]] (1915), [[Félix d'Hérelle]] (1917).
Line 163: Line 166:
* 1934: The [[Gelfond–Schneider theorem]], in mathematics, establishes the [[transcendental number|transcendence]] of a large class of numbers. It was originally proved in 1934 by [[Aleksandr Gelfond]], and again independently in 1935 by [[Theodor Schneider]].
* 1934: The [[Gelfond–Schneider theorem]], in mathematics, establishes the [[transcendental number|transcendence]] of a large class of numbers. It was originally proved in 1934 by [[Aleksandr Gelfond]], and again independently in 1935 by [[Theodor Schneider]].
* 1934: The [[Penrose triangle]], also known as the "tribar", is an [[impossible object]]. It was first created by the Swedish artist [[Oscar Reutersvärd]] in 1934. The [[mathematician]] [[Roger Penrose]] independently devised and popularized it in the 1950s.
* 1934: The [[Penrose triangle]], also known as the "tribar", is an [[impossible object]]. It was first created by the Swedish artist [[Oscar Reutersvärd]] in 1934. The [[mathematician]] [[Roger Penrose]] independently devised and popularized it in the 1950s.
* 1936: In [[computer science]], the concept of the "universal computing machine" (now generally called the "[[Turing Machine]]") was proposed by [[Alan Turing]], but also independently by [[Emil Leon Post|Emil Post]],<ref>See the "bibliographic notes" at the end of chapter 7 in Hopcroft & Ullman, ''Introduction to Automata, Languages, and Computation'', Addison-Wesley, 1979.</ref> both in 1936. Similar approaches, also aiming to cover the concept of universal computing, were introduced by [[Stephen Cole Kleene|S.C. Kleene]], [[Rózsa Péter]], and [[Alonzo Church]] that same year. Also in 1936, [[Konrad Zuse]] tried to build a binary electrically driven mechanical calculator with limited programability; however, Zuse's machine was never fully functional. The later [[Atanasoff–Berry Computer]] ("ABC"), designed by [[John Vincent Atanasoff]] and [[Clifford Berry]], was the first fully [[electronics|electronic]] [[Digital data|digital]] [[computing]] device;<ref>{{Citation |date=1976 |editor1-last=Ralston |editor1-first=Anthony |editor2-last=Meek |editor2-first=Christopher |title=Encyclopedia of Computer Science |edition=2nd |pages=488–489 |isbn=978-0-88405-321-7}}</ref> while not programmable, it pioneered important elements of modern computing, including [[binary arithmetic]] and [[Electronics|electronic switching]] elements,<ref>{{Citation |last1=Campbell-Kelly |first1=Martin |last2=Aspray |first2=William |date=1996 |title=Computer: A History of the Information Machine |page=84 |isbn=978-0-465-02989-1 |publisher=[[Basic Books]] |location=New York |title-link=Computer: A History of the Information Machine}}.</ref><ref>[[Jane Smiley]], ''The Man Who Invented the Computer: The Biography of John Atanasoff, Digital Pioneer'', 2010.</ref> though its special-purpose nature and lack of a changeable, [[stored program]] distinguish it from modern computers.
* 1936: In [[computer science]], the concept of the "universal computing machine" (now generally called the "[[Turing Machine]]") was proposed by [[Alan Turing]], but also independently by [[Emil Leon Post|Emil Post]],<ref>See the "bibliographic notes" at the end of chapter 7 in Hopcroft & Ullman, ''Introduction to Automata, Languages, and Computation'', Addison-Wesley, 1979.</ref> both in 1936. Similar approaches, also aiming to cover the concept of universal computing, were introduced by [[Stephen Cole Kleene|S.C. Kleene]], [[Rózsa Péter]], and [[Alonzo Church]] that same year. Also in 1936, [[Konrad Zuse]] tried to build a binary electrically driven mechanical calculator with limited programability; however, Zuse's machine was never fully functional. The later [[Atanasoff–Berry Computer]] ("ABC"), designed by [[John Vincent Atanasoff]] and [[Clifford Berry]], was the first fully [[electronics|electronic]] [[Digital data|digital]] [[computing]] device;<ref>{{Citation |date=1976 |editor1-last=Ralston |editor1-first=Anthony |editor2-last=Meek |editor2-first=Christopher |title=Encyclopedia of Computer Science |edition=2nd |pages=488–489 |publisher=Petrocelli/Charter |isbn=978-0-88405-321-7}}</ref> while not programmable, it pioneered important elements of modern computing, including [[binary arithmetic]] and [[Electronics|electronic switching]] elements,<ref>{{Citation |last1=Campbell-Kelly |first1=Martin |last2=Aspray |first2=William |date=1996 |title=Computer: A History of the Information Machine |page=84 |isbn=978-0-465-02989-1 |publisher=[[Basic Books]] |location=New York |title-link=Computer: A History of the Information Machine}}.</ref><ref>[[Jane Smiley]], ''The Man Who Invented the Computer: The Biography of John Atanasoff, Digital Pioneer'', 2010.</ref> though its special-purpose nature and lack of a changeable, [[stored program]] distinguish it from modern computers.
* 1938: [[Benford's law]], also known as the [[Newcomb–Benford law]], the [[law of anomalous numbers]], or the [[first-digit law]], was discovered in 1881 by [[Simon Newcomb]] and rediscovered in 1938 by [[Frank Benford]].<ref>Jack Murtagh, "This Unexpected Pattern of Numbers Is Everywhere: A curious mathematical phenomenon called Benford's law governs the numbers all around us", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 329, no. 5 (December 2023), pp. 82–83.</ref> Newcomb's discovery was named after its ''re''discoverer, Benford, making it an example of [[Stigler's law of eponymy]] (named by [[Stephen Stigler]] after himself in 1980: see below).
* 1938: [[Benford's law]], also known as the [[Newcomb–Benford law]], the [[law of anomalous numbers]], or the [[first-digit law]], was discovered in 1881 by [[Simon Newcomb]] and rediscovered in 1938 by [[Frank Benford]].<ref>Jack Murtagh, "This Unexpected Pattern of Numbers Is Everywhere: A curious mathematical phenomenon called Benford's law governs the numbers all around us", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 329, no. 5 (December 2023), pp. 82–83.</ref> Newcomb's discovery was named after its ''re''discoverer, Benford, making it an example of [[Stigler's law of eponymy]] (named by [[Stephen Stigler]] after himself in 1980: see below).
* The [[atom bomb]] was independently thought of by [[Leó Szilárd]],<ref>[[Richard Rhodes]], ''The Making of the Atomic Bomb'', New York, Simon and Schuster, 1986, {{ISBN|0-671-44133-7}}, p. 27.</ref> [[Józef Rotblat]]<ref>[[Irwin Abrams]] website,[http://www.irwinabrams.com/books/excerpts/annual95.html]</ref> and others.
* The [[atom bomb]] was independently thought of by [[Leó Szilárd]],<ref>[[Richard Rhodes]], ''The Making of the Atomic Bomb'', New York, Simon and Schuster, 1986, {{ISBN|0-671-44133-7}}, p. 27.</ref> [[Józef Rotblat]]<ref>[[Irwin Abrams]] website,[http://www.irwinabrams.com/books/excerpts/annual95.html]</ref> and others.
Line 180: Line 183:
* [[Capital asset pricing model#Inventors|Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)]] is a popular model in finance for trading off risk versus return. Three separate authors published it in academic journals and a fourth circulated unpublished papers.
* [[Capital asset pricing model#Inventors|Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)]] is a popular model in finance for trading off risk versus return. Three separate authors published it in academic journals and a fourth circulated unpublished papers.
* 1963: In a major advance in the development of [[plate tectonics theory]], the [[Vine–Matthews–Morley hypothesis]] was independently proposed by [[Lawrence Morley]], and by [[Fred Vine]] and [[Drummond Matthews]], linking [[seafloor spreading]] and the symmetric "zebra pattern" of [[magnetic reversals]] in the [[basalt]] rocks on either side of mid-ocean ridges.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Heirtzler |first1=James R. |first2=Xavier |last2=Le Pichon |first3=J. Gregory |last3=Baron |date=1966 |title=Magnetic anomalies over the Reykjanes Ridge |journal=Deep-Sea Research |volume=13 |issue=3 |pages=427–32 |doi=10.1016/0011-7471(66)91078-3 |ref=CITEREFHeirzlerLe PichonBaron1966 |bibcode=1966DSRA...13..427H}}</ref>
* 1963: In a major advance in the development of [[plate tectonics theory]], the [[Vine–Matthews–Morley hypothesis]] was independently proposed by [[Lawrence Morley]], and by [[Fred Vine]] and [[Drummond Matthews]], linking [[seafloor spreading]] and the symmetric "zebra pattern" of [[magnetic reversals]] in the [[basalt]] rocks on either side of mid-ocean ridges.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Heirtzler |first1=James R. |first2=Xavier |last2=Le Pichon |first3=J. Gregory |last3=Baron |date=1966 |title=Magnetic anomalies over the Reykjanes Ridge |journal=Deep-Sea Research |volume=13 |issue=3 |pages=427–32 |doi=10.1016/0011-7471(66)91078-3 |ref=CITEREFHeirzlerLe PichonBaron1966 |bibcode=1966DSRA...13..427H}}</ref>
* [[Cosmic background radiation]] as a signature of the [[Big Bang]] was confirmed by [[Arno Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson|Robert Wilson]] of [[Bell Labs]]. Penzias and Wilson had been testing a very sensitive microwave detector when they noticed that their equipment was picking up a strange noise that was independent of the orientation (direction) of their instrument. At first they thought the noise was generated due to pigeon droppings in the detector, but even after they removed the droppings the noise was still detected. Meanwhile, at nearby [[Princeton University]] two physicists, [[Robert H. Dicke|Robert Dicke]] and [[Jim Peebles]], were working on a suggestion of [[George Gamow]]'s that the early universe had been hot and dense; they believed its hot glow could still be detected but would be so [[red shift|red-shifted]] that it would manifest as microwaves. When [[Arno Penzias|Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson|Wilson]] learned about this, they realized that they had already detected the red-shifted microwaves and (to the disappointment of Dicke and Peebles) were awarded the 1978 [[Nobel Prize]] in physics.<ref name="Time, Bantam 1996, pp. 43–45" />
* [[Cosmic microwave background]] as a signature of the [[Big Bang]] was confirmed by [[Arno Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson|Robert Wilson]] of [[Bell Labs]]. Penzias and Wilson had been testing a very sensitive microwave detector when they noticed that their equipment was picking up a strange noise that was independent of the orientation (direction) of their instrument. At first they thought the noise was generated due to pigeon droppings in the detector, but even after they removed the droppings the noise was still detected. Meanwhile, at nearby [[Princeton University]] two physicists, [[Robert H. Dicke|Robert Dicke]] and [[Jim Peebles]], were working on a suggestion of [[George Gamow]]'s that the early universe had been hot and dense; they believed its hot glow could still be detected but would be so [[red shift|red-shifted]] that it would manifest as microwaves. When [[Arno Penzias|Penzias]] and [[Robert Woodrow Wilson|Wilson]] learned about this, they realized that they had already detected the red-shifted microwaves and (to the disappointment of Dicke and Peebles) were awarded the 1978 [[Nobel Prize]] in physics.<ref name="Time, Bantam 1996, pp. 43–45" />
* 1963: [[Conductive polymers]]: Between 1963 and 1977, doped and oxidized highly conductive polyacetylene derivatives were independently discovered, "lost", and then rediscovered at least four times. The last rediscovery won the 2000 Nobel prize in Chemistry, for the "discovery and development of conductive polymers". This was without reference to the previous discoveries.<ref>Citations in article "[[Conductive polymers]]".</ref>
* 1963: [[Conductive polymers]]: Between 1963 and 1977, doped and oxidized highly conductive polyacetylene derivatives were independently discovered, "lost", and then rediscovered at least four times. The last rediscovery won the 2000 Nobel prize in Chemistry, for the "discovery and development of conductive polymers". This was without reference to the previous discoveries.<ref>Citations in article "[[Conductive polymers]]".</ref>
* 1964: The relativistic model for the [[Higgs mechanism]] was developed by three independent groups: [[Robert Brout]] and [[François Englert]]; [[Peter Higgs]]; and [[Gerald Guralnik]], [[Carl Richard Hagen]], and [[Tom Kibble]].<ref>Sean Carrol, ''The Particle at the End of the Universe: The Hunt for the Higgs and the Discovery of a New World'', Dutton, 2012, p.228. [http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15744013-the-particle-at-the-end-of-the-universe]</ref> Slightly later, in 1965, it was also proposed by Soviet undergraduate students [[Alexander Migdal]] and [[Alexander Markovich Polyakov]].<ref>{{cite journal |first1=A. A. |last1=Migdal |author1-link=Alexander Migdal |first2=A. M. |last2=Polyakov |author2-link=Alexander Markovich Polyakov |url= http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_024_01_0091.pdf |title=Spontaneous Breakdown of Strong Interaction Symmetry and Absence of Massless Particles |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131203014220/http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_024_01_0091.pdf |archive-date=3 December 2013 |journal=JETP |volume=51 |page=135 |date=July 1966}} (English translation: ''Soviet Physics JETP'', vol. 24, p. 1, January 1967.)</ref> The existence of the "[[Higgs boson]]" was finally confirmed in 2012; Higgs and Englert were awarded a Nobel Prize in 2013.
* 1964: The relativistic model for the [[Higgs mechanism]] was developed by three independent groups: [[Robert Brout]] and [[François Englert]]; [[Peter Higgs]]; and [[Gerald Guralnik]], [[Carl Richard Hagen]], and [[Tom Kibble]].<ref>Sean Carrol, ''The Particle at the End of the Universe: The Hunt for the Higgs and the Discovery of a New World'', Dutton, 2012, p.228. [http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15744013-the-particle-at-the-end-of-the-universe]</ref> Slightly later, in 1965, it was also proposed by Soviet undergraduate students [[Alexander Migdal]] and [[Alexander Markovich Polyakov]].<ref>{{cite journal |first1=A. A. |last1=Migdal |author1-link=Alexander Migdal |first2=A. M. |last2=Polyakov |author2-link=Alexander Markovich Polyakov |url= http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_024_01_0091.pdf |title=Spontaneous Breakdown of Strong Interaction Symmetry and Absence of Massless Particles |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131203014220/http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_024_01_0091.pdf |archive-date=3 December 2013 |journal=JETP |volume=51 |page=135 |date=July 1966}} (English translation: ''Soviet Physics JETP'', vol. 24, p. 1, January 1967.)</ref> The existence of the "[[Higgs boson]]" was finally confirmed in 2012; Higgs and Englert were awarded a Nobel Prize in 2013.
Line 207: Line 210:
* 1987: The [[Immerman–Szelepcsényi theorem]], another fundamental result in computational complexity theory, was proven independently by [[Neil Immerman]] and [[Róbert Szelepcsényi]] in 1987.<ref>See [http://www.eatcs.org/activities/awards/goedel1995.html EATCS on the Gödel Prize 1995] {{webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070804131454/https://www.eatcs.org/activities/awards/goedel1995.html |date=4 August 2007}}.</ref>
* 1987: The [[Immerman–Szelepcsényi theorem]], another fundamental result in computational complexity theory, was proven independently by [[Neil Immerman]] and [[Róbert Szelepcsényi]] in 1987.<ref>See [http://www.eatcs.org/activities/awards/goedel1995.html EATCS on the Gödel Prize 1995] {{webarchive|url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070804131454/https://www.eatcs.org/activities/awards/goedel1995.html |date=4 August 2007}}.</ref>
* 1989: [[Thomas R. Cech]] (Colorado) and [[Sidney Altman]] (Yale) won the [[Nobel Prize]] in [[chemistry]] for their independent discovery in the 1980s of [[ribozyme]]s{{spaced ndash}}for the "discovery of catalytic properties of RNA"{{spaced ndash}}using different approaches. Catalytic RNA was an unexpected finding, something they were not looking for, and it required rigorous proof that there was no contaminating protein enzyme.
* 1989: [[Thomas R. Cech]] (Colorado) and [[Sidney Altman]] (Yale) won the [[Nobel Prize]] in [[chemistry]] for their independent discovery in the 1980s of [[ribozyme]]s{{spaced ndash}}for the "discovery of catalytic properties of RNA"{{spaced ndash}}using different approaches. Catalytic RNA was an unexpected finding, something they were not looking for, and it required rigorous proof that there was no contaminating protein enzyme.
* 1991: [[psychiatrist]] [[Christopher Kasparek]] proposed that [[schizophrenia]] be renamed "[[psychosis]]".<ref>[[Christopher Kasparek]], "Psychiatry and Special Interests", ''The Psychiatric Times'', February 1991, p. 6.</ref> In 2015 a similar suggestion was made by psychiatry professor [[Jim van Os]], who proposed that schizophrenia be renamed "psychotic spectrum disorder".<ref>Van Os et al, NRC Handelsblad, 2015, laten we de diagnose schizofrenie vergeten http://www.nrc.nl/handelsblad/2015/03/07/laten-we-de-diagnose-schizofrenie-vergeten-1472619</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Os|first=Jim van|date=2016-02-02|title="Schizophrenia" does not exist|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/352/bmj.i375|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=352|pages=i375|doi=10.1136/bmj.i375|issn=1756-1833|pmid=26837945|s2cid=116098585 |url-access=subscription}}</ref>
* 1993: groups led by [[Donald S. Bethune]] at IBM and [[Sumio Iijima]] at NEC independently discovered [[Carbon nanotubes#Single-walled|single-wall]] [[carbon nanotubes]] and methods to produce them using transition-metal catalysts.
* 1993: groups led by [[Donald S. Bethune]] at IBM and [[Sumio Iijima]] at NEC independently discovered [[Carbon nanotubes#Single-walled|single-wall]] [[carbon nanotubes]] and methods to produce them using transition-metal catalysts.
* 1994: The [[local average treatment effect]] (LATE) was first introduced in the econometrics literature in 1994 by [[Guido Imbens|Guido W. Imbens]] and [[Joshua Angrist|Joshua D. Angrist]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Imbens |first1=Guido W. |last2=Angrist |first2=Joshua D. |date=1994 |title=Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951620 |journal=Econometrica |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=467–475 |doi=10.2307/2951620 |jstor=2951620 |issn=0012-9682}}</ref> who shared half of the [[2021 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences]]. Stuart G. Baker and Karen S. Lindeman in 1994 <ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Baker |first1=Stuart G. |last2=Lindeman |first2=Karen S. |date=1994-11-15 |title=The paired availability design: A proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.4780132108 |journal=Statistics in Medicine |language=en |volume=13 |issue=21 |pages=2269–2278 |doi=10.1002/sim.4780132108 |pmid=7846425 |issn=0277-6715}}</ref> independently published the LATE method for a binary outcome with the paired availability design and the key monotonicity assumption. An early version of LATE involved one-sided noncompliance (and hence no monotonicity assumption). In 1983 Baker wrote a technical report describing LATE for one-sided noncompliance that was published in 2016 in a supplement. In 1984, Bloom published a paper on LATE with one-sided compliance. A history of multiple discoveries involving LATE appears in Baker and Lindeman (2024).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Baker |first1=Stuart G. |last2=Lindeman |first2=Karen S. |date=2024-04-02 |title=Multiple Discoveries in Causal Inference: LATE for the Party |journal=CHANCE |language=en |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=21–25 |doi=10.1080/09332480.2024.2348956 |pmid=38957370 |pmc=11218811 |issn=0933-2480}}</ref>
* 1998: [[Saul Perlmutter]], [[Adam G. Riess]], and [[Brian P. Schmidt]]—working as members of two independent projects, the [[Supernova Cosmology Project]] and the [[High-Z Supernova Search Team]]—simultaneously discovered in 1998 the [[accelerating universe|accelerating expansion of the universe]] through observations of distant [[supernovae]]. For this, they were jointly awarded the 2006 [[Shaw Prize]] in Astronomy and the 2011 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]].<ref name="BibcodeApSSP">{{cite journal |bibcode=1992Ap&SS.191..107P |doi=10.1007/BF00644200 |title=Inflation and compactification from Galaxy redshifts? |date=1992 |last1=Paál |first1=G. |last2=Horváth |first2=I. |last3=Lukács |first3=B. |journal=Astrophysics and Space Science |volume=191 |issue=1 |pages=107–124 |s2cid=116951785}}</ref><ref>[[Richard Panek]], "The Cosmic Surprise: Scientists discovered dark energy 25 years ago. They're still trying to figure out what it is", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 329, no.5 (December 2023), pp. 62–71.</ref><ref>In regard to his "[[cosmological constant]]", "Einstein&nbsp;... blundered twice: by introducing the cosmological constant for the wrong reason [to maintain a [[static universe]], before the advent of the [[Big Bang]] theory] and again by throwing it out instead of exploring its implications [including an [[accelerating universe]]<nowiki />]." [[Lawrence M. Krauss]], "What Einstein Got Wrong: Cosmology", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 313, no. 3 (September 2015), p. 55.</ref>
* 1998: [[Saul Perlmutter]], [[Adam G. Riess]], and [[Brian P. Schmidt]]—working as members of two independent projects, the [[Supernova Cosmology Project]] and the [[High-Z Supernova Search Team]]—simultaneously discovered in 1998 the [[accelerating universe|accelerating expansion of the universe]] through observations of distant [[supernovae]]. For this, they were jointly awarded the 2006 [[Shaw Prize]] in Astronomy and the 2011 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]].<ref name="BibcodeApSSP">{{cite journal |bibcode=1992Ap&SS.191..107P |doi=10.1007/BF00644200 |title=Inflation and compactification from Galaxy redshifts? |date=1992 |last1=Paál |first1=G. |last2=Horváth |first2=I. |last3=Lukács |first3=B. |journal=Astrophysics and Space Science |volume=191 |issue=1 |pages=107–124 |s2cid=116951785}}</ref><ref>[[Richard Panek]], "The Cosmic Surprise: Scientists discovered dark energy 25 years ago. They're still trying to figure out what it is", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 329, no.5 (December 2023), pp. 62–71.</ref><ref>In regard to his "[[cosmological constant]]", "Einstein&nbsp;... blundered twice: by introducing the cosmological constant for the wrong reason [to maintain a [[static universe]], before the advent of the [[Big Bang]] theory] and again by throwing it out instead of exploring its implications [including an [[accelerating universe]]<nowiki />]." [[Lawrence M. Krauss]], "What Einstein Got Wrong: Cosmology", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 313, no. 3 (September 2015), p. 55.</ref>


Line 263: Line 268:
* {{cite book |first=N. E. |last=Collinge |title=The Laws of Indo-European |url= https://archive.org/details/lawsofindoeurope0000coll |url-access=registration |location=[[Amsterdam]] |publisher=John Benjamins |date=1985 |isbn=978-0-915027-75-0 |id=(U.S.), (Europe)}}
* {{cite book |first=N. E. |last=Collinge |title=The Laws of Indo-European |url= https://archive.org/details/lawsofindoeurope0000coll |url-access=registration |location=[[Amsterdam]] |publisher=John Benjamins |date=1985 |isbn=978-0-915027-75-0 |id=(U.S.), (Europe)}}
* [[Tim Folger]], "The Quantum Hack: Quantum computers will render today's cryptographic methods obsolete. What happens then?" ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 314, no. 2 (February 2016), pp.&nbsp;48–55.
* [[Tim Folger]], "The Quantum Hack: Quantum computers will render today's cryptographic methods obsolete. What happens then?" ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 314, no. 2 (February 2016), pp.&nbsp;48–55.
* [[Sarah Lewin Frasier]] and [[Jen Christiansen]], "Nobel Connections: A deep dive into science's greatest prize", ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 331, no. 3 (October 2024), pp. 72–73.
* {{cite book |last1=Garey |first1=Michael R. |author1-link=Michael R. Garey |last2=Johnson |first2=David S. |author2-link=David S. Johnson |date=1979 |title=Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness |publisher=W. H. Freeman |isbn=978-0-7167-1045-5 |url-access=registration |url= https://archive.org/details/computersintract0000gare}}
* {{cite book |last1=Garey |first1=Michael R. |author1-link=Michael R. Garey |last2=Johnson |first2=David S. |author2-link=David S. Johnson |date=1979 |title=Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness |publisher=W. H. Freeman |isbn=978-0-7167-1045-5 |url-access=registration |url= https://archive.org/details/computersintract0000gare}}
* [[Owen Gingerich]], "Did Copernicus Owe a Debt to Aristarchus?" ''[[Journal for the History of Astronomy]]'', vol. 16, no. 1 (February 1985), pp.&nbsp;37–42. [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1985JHA....16...37G/0000037.000.html 1985JHA....16...37G Page 37]
* [[Owen Gingerich]], "Did Copernicus Owe a Debt to Aristarchus?" ''[[Journal for the History of Astronomy]]'', vol. 16, no. 1 (February 1985), pp.&nbsp;37–42. [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1985JHA....16...37G/0000037.000.html 1985JHA....16...37G Page 37]

Latest revision as of 03:17, 4 December 2024

Historians and sociologists have remarked the occurrence, in science, of "multiple independent discovery". Robert K. Merton defined such "multiples" as instances in which similar discoveries are made by scientists working independently of each other.[1] "Sometimes", writes Merton, "the discoveries are simultaneous or almost so; sometimes a scientist will make a new discovery which, unknown to him, somebody else has made years before."[2]

Commonly cited examples of multiple independent discovery are the 17th-century independent formulation of calculus by Isaac Newton, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and others, described by A. Rupert Hall;[3] the 18th-century discovery of oxygen by Carl Wilhelm Scheele, Joseph Priestley, Antoine Lavoisier and others; and the theory of the evolution of species, independently advanced in the 19th century by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace.

Multiple independent discovery, however, is not limited to such famous historic instances. Merton believed that it is multiple discoveries, rather than unique ones, that represent the common pattern in science.[4]

Merton contrasted a "multiple" with a "singleton"—a discovery that has been made uniquely by a single scientist or group of scientists working together.[5]

The distinction may blur as science becomes increasingly collaborative.[6]

A distinction is drawn between a discovery and an invention, as discussed for example by Bolesław Prus.[7] However, discoveries and inventions are inextricably related, in that discoveries lead to inventions, and inventions facilitate discoveries; and since the same phenomenon of multiplicity occurs in relation to both discoveries and inventions, this article lists both multiple discoveries and multiple inventions.

3rd century BCE

[edit]
Aristarchos

13th century CE

[edit]

14th century

[edit]
Copernicus

16th century

[edit]
Galileo
Ortelius

17th century

[edit]
Newton
Leibniz

18th century

[edit]
Scheele
Laplace

19th century

[edit]
Gauss
Faraday
Darwin
Mendeleyev
Bell
Ramón y Cajal
Cybulski
Becquerel

20th century

[edit]
Nettie Stevens
Smoluchowski
Tykociński-Tykociner
Einstein
Alexander Friedmann
Hsien Wu
Szilárd
Koprowski
Purcell
Nambu
Higgs
Schwinger
Vine
Penzias
Schally
Baltimore
Alvarez
Barré-Sinoussi
Immerman
Cocks
Wilczek
Ting
Cech
Perlmutter, Riess, Schmidt

21st century

[edit]
McDonald, Kajita
Allison
Šikšnys
Patapoutian

Quotations

[edit]

"When the time is ripe for certain things, these things appear in different places in the manner of violets coming to light in early spring."

— Farkas Bolyai to his son János Bolyai, urging him to claim the invention of non-Euclidean geometry without delay,
quoted in Ming Li and Paul Vitanyi, An introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, 1st ed., 1993, p. 83.

"[Y]ou do not [make a discovery] until a background knowledge is built up to a place where it's almost impossible not to see the new thing, and it often happens that the new step is done contemporaneously in two different places in the world, independently."

— a physicist Nobel laureate interviewed by Harriet Zuckerman, in Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, 1977, p. 204.

"[A] man can no more be completely original ... than a tree can grow out of air."

— George Bernard Shaw, preface to Major Barbara (1905).

I never had an idea in my life. My so-called inventions already existed in the environment – I took them out. I've created nothing. Nobody does. There's no such thing as an idea being brain-born; everything comes from the outside.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Priyamvada Natarajan notes that, while Le Verrier and Adams "shared credit for the discovery [of Neptune] until fairly recently ... historians of science [have] revealed that while Adams did perform some interesting calculations, his were not as precise or as accurate as Le Verrier's, and, moreover, he had not published his work, while Le Verrier had shared his predictions." Le Verrier "presented the calculated position of th[e] unseen planet [Neptune] to the French Academy of Sciences in Paris on August 31, 1846, barely two days before Adams mailed his own solution to the astronomer royal, George Airy, at the Greenwich Observatory so that his calculations could be checked. Neither Adams nor Le Verrier knew that the other had been researching Uranus's orbit." Natarajan also notes that, "Though Neptune wasn't properly identified until 1846, it had been observed much earlier.": by Galileo Galilei (1612, 1613); by Michel Lalande (8 and 10 May 1795), nephew and pupil of French astronomer Joseph-Jérôme Lalande; by Scottish astronomer John Lambert, while working at the Munich Observatory in 1845 and 1846; and by James Challis (4 and 12 August 1846).[38]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Merton, Robert K. (December 1963). "Resistance to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science". European Journal of Sociology. 4 (2): 237–282. doi:10.1017/S0003975600000801. JSTOR 23998345. S2CID 145650007. Reprinted in: Merton, Robert K. (15 September 1996). On Social Structure and Science. University of Chicago Press. pp. 305–. ISBN 978-0-226-52070-4.
  2. ^ Merton, Robert K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press. p. 371. ISBN 978-0-226-52092-6.
  3. ^ A. Rupert Hall, Philosophers at War, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  4. ^ Robert K. Merton, "Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery: a Chapter in the Sociology of Science", Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105: 470–86, 1961. Reprinted in Robert K. Merton, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 343–70.
  5. ^ Robert K. Merton, On Social Structure and Science, p. 307.
  6. ^ Sarah Lewin Frasier and Jen Christiansen, "Nobel Connections: A deep dive into science's greatest prize", Scientific American, vol. 331, no. 3 (October 2024), pp. 72–73.
  7. ^ Bolesław Prus, O odkryciach i wynalazkach (On Discoveries and Inventions): A Public Lecture Delivered on 23 March 1873 by Aleksander Głowacki [Bolesław Prus], Passed by the [Russian] Censor (Warsaw, 21 April 1873), Warsaw, Printed by F. Krokoszyńska, 1873, p. 12.
  8. ^ Owen Gingerich, "Did Copernicus Owe a Debt to Aristarchus?" Journal for the History of Astronomy, vol. 16, no. 1 (February 1985), pp. 37–42. [1]
  9. ^ Dava Sobel, A More Perfect Heaven: How Copernicus Revolutionized the Cosmos, New York, Walker & Company, 2011, ISBN 978-0-8027-1793-1, pp. 18–19, 179–82.
  10. ^ "Copernicus seems to have drawn up some notes [on the displacement of good coin from circulation by debased coin] while he was at Olsztyn in 1519. He made them the basis of a report on the matter, written in German, which he presented to the Prussian Diet held in 1522 at Grudziądz .... He later drew up a revised and enlarged version of his little treatise, this time in Latin, and setting forth a general theory of money, for presentation to the Diet of 1528." Angus Armitage, The World of Copernicus, 1951, p. 91.
  11. ^ Αριστοφάνης. "Βάτραχοι". Βικιθήκη. Retrieved 19 April 2013.
  12. ^ a b Cappi, Alberto (1994). "Edgar Allan Poe's Physical Cosmology". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 35: 177–192. Bibcode:1994QJRAS..35..177C.
  13. ^ * Rombeck, Terry (22 January 2005). "Poe's little-known science book reprinted". Lawrence Journal-World & News.
  14. ^ Marilynne Robinson, "On Edgar Allan Poe", The New York Review of Books, vol. LXII, no. 2 (5 February 2015), pp. 4, 6.
  15. ^ Romm, James (3 February 1994), "A New Forerunner for Continental Drift", Nature, 367 (6462): 407–408, Bibcode:1994Natur.367..407R, doi:10.1038/367407a0, S2CID 4281585.
  16. ^ a b Schmeling, Harro (2004). "Geodynamik" (PDF) (in German). University of Frankfurt.
  17. ^ Wallace, Alfred Russel (1889), "12", Darwinism ..., Macmillan, p. 341
  18. ^ Lyell, Charles (1872), Principles of Geology ... (11th ed.), John Murray, p. 258
  19. ^ Coxworthy, Franklin (1924). Electrical Condition; Or, How and where Our Earth was Created. J. S. Phillips. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  20. ^ Pickering, W. H (1907), "The Place of Origin of the Moon – The Volcani Problems", Popular Astronomy, 15: 274–287, Bibcode:1907PA.....15..274P,
  21. ^ Bursley Taylor, Frank (3 June 1910). "Bearing of the Tertiary mountain belt on the origin of the earth's plan". Bulletin of the Geological Society of America. 21 (1): 179–226. Bibcode:1910GSAB...21..179T. doi:10.1130/GSAB-21-179.
  22. ^ Wegener, Alfred (6 January 1912), "Die Herausbildung der Grossformen der Erdrinde (Kontinente und Ozeane), auf geophysikalischer Grundlage" (PDF), Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 63: 185–195, 253–256, 305–309, archived from the original (PDF) on 4 October 2011.
  23. ^ Eduard Suess, Das Antlitz der Erde (The Face of the Earth), vol. 1 (Leipzig, (Germany): G. Freytag, 1885), page 768. From p. 768: "Wir nennen es Gondwána-Land, nach der gemeinsamen alten Gondwána-Flora, … " (We name it Gondwána-Land, after the common ancient flora of Gondwána ... )
  24. ^ Suess, Edward (March 1893). "Are ocean depths permanent?". Natural Science: A Monthly Review of Scientific Progress. 2: 180–187 – via Google Books. This ocean we designate by the name 'Tethys', after the sister and consort of Oceanus. The latest successor of the Tethyan Sea is the present Mediterranean.
  25. ^ Perry, John (1895). "On the age of the earth". Nature. 51: 224–227, 341–342, 582–585 – via Hathi Trust.
  26. ^ Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality, Vintage Books, 2005, p. 103.
  27. ^ Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1996, p. 17.
  28. ^ Vladimir D. Shiltsev, "Nov. 19, 1771: Birth of Mikhail Lomonosov, Russia's first modern scientist", APS [American Physical Society] News, November 2011 (vol. 20, no. 10) [2].
  29. ^ Anirudh, "10 Major Contributions of Antoine Lavoisier", 17 October 2017 [3].
  30. ^ "MICHAEL SENDIVOGIUS, ROSICRUCIAN, and FATHER OF STUDIES OF OXYGEN" (PDF).
  31. ^ Alan Ellis, "Black Holes – Part 1 – History", Astronomical Society of Edinburgh, Journal 39, 1999 Archived 6 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine. A description of Michell's theory of black holes.
  32. ^ a b Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Bantam, 1996, pp. 43–45.
  33. ^ "Hong's essential insight is the same as Malthus's". Wm Theodore de Bary, Sources of East Asian Tradition, vol. 2: The Modern Period, New York, Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 85.
  34. ^ Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality, Vintage Books, 2005, p. 81.
  35. ^ Gauss, Carl Friedrich, "Nachlass: Theoria interpolationis methodo nova tractata", Werke, Band 3, Göttingen, Königliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 1866, pp. 265–327.
  36. ^ Heideman, M. T., D. H. Johnson, and C. S. Burrus, "Gauss and the history of the fast Fourier transform", Archive for History of Exact Sciences, vol. 34, no. 3 (1985), pp. 265–277.
  37. ^ Halliday et al., Physics, vol. 2, 2002, p. 775.
  38. ^ a b Priyamvada Natarajan, "In Search of Planet X" (review of Dale P. Cruikshank and William Sheehan, Discovering Pluto: Exploration at the Edge of the Solar System, University of Arizona Press, 475 pp.; Alan Stern and David Grinspoon, Chasing New Horizons: Inside the Epic First Mission to Pluto, Picador, 295 pp.; and Adam Morton, Should We Colonize Other Planets?, Polity, 122 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXVI, no. 16 (24 October 2019), pp. 39–41. (p. 39.)
  39. ^ "Aug. 18, 1868: Helium Discovered During Total Solar Eclipse", https://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2009/08/dayintech_0818/
  40. ^ Bolesław Prus, On Discoveries and Inventions: A Public Lecture Delivered on 23 March 1873 by Aleksander Głowacki [Bolesław Prus], Passed by the [Russian] Censor (Warsaw, 21 April 1873), Warsaw, Printed by F. Krokoszyńska, 1873, [4], p. 13.
  41. ^ Christopher Kasparek, review of Robert Olby, The Path to the Double Helix, in Zagadnienia naukoznawstwa [Logology, or Science of Science], Warsaw, Polish Academy of Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3 (1978), pp. 461–63.
  42. ^ Wilkinson, Alec, "Illuminating the Brain's 'Utter Darkness'" (review of Benjamin Ehrlich, The Brain in Search of Itself: Santiago Ramón y Cajal and the Story of the Neuron, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023, 447 pp.; and Timothy J. Jorgensen, Spark: The Life of Electricity and the Electricity of Life, Princeton University Press, 2021, 436 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXX, no. 2 (9 February 2023), pp. 32, 34–35. (information cited, on pp. 32 and 34.)
  43. ^ Maury Klein, Chapter 9: "The Cowbird, The Plugger, and the Dreamer", The Power Makers: Steam, Electricity, and the Men Who Invented Modern America, Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2010.
  44. ^ Kenneth E. Hendrickson III, The Encyclopedia of the Industrial Revolution in World History, volume 3, Rowman & Littlefield, 2014, p. 564.
  45. ^ Isaac Asimov, Asimov's Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, p. 933.
  46. ^ N.E. Collinge, The Laws of Indo-European, pp. 149–52.
  47. ^ Collinge, N. E. (1 January 1985). The Laws of Indo-European. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 978-9027235305.
  48. ^ Skalski, J. H.; Kuch, J. (April 2006). "Polish thread in the history of circulatory physiology". Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 57 (Suppl 1): 5–41. PMID 16766800.
  49. ^ Yamashima, T. (May 2003). "Jokichi Takamine (1854–1922), the samurai chemist, and his work on adrenalin". Journal of Medical Biography. 11 (2): 95–102. doi:10.1177/096777200301100211. PMID 12717538. S2CID 32540165.
  50. ^ Bennett, M. R. (June 1999). "One hundred years of adrenaline: the discovery of autoreceptors". Clinical Autonomic Research. 9 (3): 145–59. doi:10.1007/BF02281628. PMID 10454061. S2CID 20999106.
  51. ^ "Had Becquerel ... not [in 1896] presented his discovery to the Académie des Sciences the day after he made it, credit for the discovery of radioactivity, and even a Nobel Prize, would have gone to Silvanus Thompson." Robert William Reid, Marie Curie, New York, New American Library, 1974, ISBN 0-00-211539-5, pp. 64–65.
  52. ^ "Marie Curie was ... beaten in the race to tell of her discovery that thorium gives off rays in the same way as uranium. Unknown to her, a German, Gerhard Carl Schmidt, had published his finding in Berlin two months earlier." Robert William Reid, Marie Curie, New York, New American Library, 1974, ISBN 0-00-211539-5, p. 65.
  53. ^ Barbara Goldsmith, Obsessive Genius: The Inner World of Marie Curie, New York, W.W. Norton, 2005, ISBN 0-393-05137-4, p. 166.
  54. ^ a b von Smoluchowski, M. (1906). "Zur kinetischen Theorie der Brownschen Molekularbewegung und der Suspensionen". Annalen der Physik (in German). 326 (14): 756–780. Bibcode:1906AnP...326..756V. doi:10.1002/andp.19063261405.
  55. ^ Sutherland, William (1 June 1905). "LXXV. A dynamical theory of diffusion for non-electrolytes and the molecular mass of albumin". Philosophical Magazine. Series 6. 9 (54): 781–785. doi:10.1080/14786440509463331.
  56. ^ ""Stokes-Einstein-Sutherland equation", P. Hänggi" (PDF).
  57. ^ Einstein, A. (1905). "Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen". Annalen der Physik (in German). 322 (8): 549–560. Bibcode:1905AnP...322..549E. doi:10.1002/andp.19053220806.
  58. ^ Brush, Stephen G. (June 1978). "Nettie M. Stevens and the Discovery of Sex Determination by Chromosomes". Isis. 69 (2): 162–172. doi:10.1086/352001. JSTOR 230427. PMID 389882. S2CID 1919033.
  59. ^ "Photochemical equivalence law". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  60. ^ Władysław Kozaczuk, Enigma: How the German Machine Cipher Was Broken, and How It Was Read by the Allies in World War II, edited and translated by Christopher Kasparek, Frederick, Maryland, University Publications of America, 1984, ISBN 0-89093-547-5, p. 27.
  61. ^ Brian Greene, "Why He [Albert Einstein] Matters: The fruits of one mind shaped civilization more than seems possible", Scientific American, vol. 313, no. 3 (September 2015), pp. 36–37.
  62. ^ "Big bang theory is introduced – 1927". A Science Odyssey. WGBH. Retrieved 31 July 2014.
  63. ^ Rombeck, Terry (22 January 2005). "Poe's little-known science book reprinted". Lawrence Journal-World & News.
  64. ^ Robinson, Marilynne, "On Edgar Allan Poe", The New York Review of Books, vol. LXII, no. 2 (5 February 2015), pp. 4, 6.
  65. ^ M.J. O'Dowd, E.E. Philipp, The History of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, London, Parthenon Publishing Group, 1994, p. 547.
  66. ^ Ooishi, W. (1926) Raporto de la Aerologia Observatorio de Tateno (in Esperanto). Aerological Observatory Report 1, Central Meteorological Observatory, Japan, 213 pages.
  67. ^ Lewis, John M. (2003). "Oishi's Observation: Viewed in the Context of Jet Stream Discovery". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 84 (3): 357–369. Bibcode:2003BAMS...84..357L. doi:10.1175/BAMS-84-3-357.
  68. ^ Acepilots.com. Wiley Post. Retrieved on 8 May 2008.
  69. ^ "Weather Basics – Jet Streams". Archived from the original on 29 August 2006. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
  70. ^ "When the jet stream was the wind of war". Archived from the original on 29 January 2016. Retrieved 9 December 2018.
  71. ^ Eggleton, Philip; Eggleton, Grace Palmer (1927). "The inorganic phosphate and a labile form of organic phosphate in the gastrocnemius of the frog". Biochemical Journal. 21 (1): 190–195. doi:10.1042/bj0210190. PMC 1251888. PMID 16743804.
  72. ^ Fiske, Cyrus H.; Subbarow, Yellapragada (1927). "The nature of the 'inorganic phosphate' in voluntary muscle". Science. 65 (1686): 401–403. Bibcode:1927Sci....65..401F. doi:10.1126/science.65.1686.401. PMID 17807679.
  73. ^ Frank, Close (22 January 2009). Antimatter. Oxford University Press. pp. 50–52. ISBN 978-0-19-955016-6.
  74. ^ Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Bantam Press, 1996, p. 88.
  75. ^ Mirsky, A. E.; Pauling, Linus (1936). "On the structure of native, denatured, and coagulated proteins". PNAS. 22 (7): 439–447. Bibcode:1936PNAS...22..439M. doi:10.1073/pnas.22.7.439. PMC 1076802. PMID 16577722.
  76. ^ Wu, Hsien (1931). "Studies on Denaturation of Proteins XIII. A Theory of Denaturation (reprint)". Chinese Journal of Physiology. Advances in Protein Chemistry. 46: 6–26. doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60330-7. ISBN 9780120342464.
  77. ^ Edsall, John (1995). "Hsien Wu and the First Theory of Protein Denaturation (1931)". Advances in Protein Chemistry Volume 46. Vol. 46. pp. 1–5. doi:10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60329-0. ISBN 978-0-12-034246-4.
  78. ^ See the "bibliographic notes" at the end of chapter 7 in Hopcroft & Ullman, Introduction to Automata, Languages, and Computation, Addison-Wesley, 1979.
  79. ^ Ralston, Anthony; Meek, Christopher, eds. (1976), Encyclopedia of Computer Science (2nd ed.), Petrocelli/Charter, pp. 488–489, ISBN 978-0-88405-321-7
  80. ^ Campbell-Kelly, Martin; Aspray, William (1996), Computer: A History of the Information Machine, New York: Basic Books, p. 84, ISBN 978-0-465-02989-1.
  81. ^ Jane Smiley, The Man Who Invented the Computer: The Biography of John Atanasoff, Digital Pioneer, 2010.
  82. ^ Jack Murtagh, "This Unexpected Pattern of Numbers Is Everywhere: A curious mathematical phenomenon called Benford's law governs the numbers all around us", Scientific American, vol. 329, no. 5 (December 2023), pp. 82–83.
  83. ^ Richard Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1986, ISBN 0-671-44133-7, p. 27.
  84. ^ Irwin Abrams website,[5]
  85. ^ Troyer, James (2001). "In the beginning: the multiple discovery of the first hormone herbicides". Weed Science. 49 (2): 290–297. doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0290:ITBTMD]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 85637273.
  86. ^ "Twists and Turns in the Development of the Transistor". Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Archived from the original on 8 January 2015. Retrieved 8 July 2015.
  87. ^ "1948 – The European Transistor Invention". Computer History Museum.
  88. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1956". NobelPrize.org.
  89. ^ Festinger, Leon (1949). "The analysis of sociograms using matrix algebra". Human Relations. 2 (2): 153–158. doi:10.1177/001872674900200205. S2CID 143609308.
  90. ^ Luce, R. Duncan; Perry, Albert D. (1949). "A method of matrix analysis of group structure". Psychometrika. 14 (2): 95–116. doi:10.1007/BF02289146. hdl:10.1007/BF02289146. PMID 18152948. S2CID 16186758.
  91. ^ "Background and Theory Page of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Facility". Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre – University of Southern Wales Sydney. 9 December 2011. Archived from the original on 27 January 2014. Retrieved 9 February 2014.
  92. ^ The Chip that Jack Built, c. 2008, HTML, Texas Instruments, retrieved 29 May 2008.
  93. ^ Christophe Lécuyer, Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 1930–1970, MIT Press, 2006, ISBN 0-262-12281-2, p. 129.
  94. ^ Nobel Web AB, 10 October 2000 The Nobel Prize in Physics 2000, retrieved 29 May 2008.
  95. ^ Golub, G.; Uhlig, F. (8 June 2009). "The QR algorithm: 50 years later its genesis by John Francis and Vera Kublanovskaya and subsequent developments". IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis. 29 (3): 467–485. doi:10.1093/imanum/drp012. ISSN 0272-4979. S2CID 119892206.
  96. ^ Dongarra, J.; Sullivan, F. (January 2000). "Guest Editors Introduction: The Top 10 Algorithms". Computing in Science & Engineering. 2 (1): 22–23. Bibcode:2000CSE.....2a..22D. doi:10.1109/MCISE.2000.814652.
  97. ^ See Chapter 1.6 in the first edition of Li & Vitanyi, An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, who cite Chaitin (1975): "this definition [of Kolmogorov complexity] was independently proposed about 1965 by A.N. Kolmogorov and me ... Both Kolmogorov and I were then unaware of related proposals made in 1960 by Ray Solomonoff".
  98. ^ Ahvenniemi, Esko; Akbashev, Andrew R.; Ali, Saima; Bechelany, Mikhael; Berdova, Maria; Boyadjiev, Stefan; Cameron, David C.; Chen, Rong; Chubarov, Mikhail (16 December 2016). "Review Article: Recommended reading list of early publications on atomic layer deposition—Outcome of the "Virtual Project on the History of ALD"". Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films. 35 (1): 010801. Bibcode:2017JVSTA..35a0801A. doi:10.1116/1.4971389. ISSN 0734-2101.
  99. ^ Puurunen, Riikka L. (1 December 2014). "A Short History of Atomic Layer Deposition: Tuomo Suntola's Atomic Layer Epitaxy". Chemical Vapor Deposition. 20 (10–11–12): 332–344. doi:10.1002/cvde.201402012. ISSN 1521-3862.
  100. ^ Malygin, Anatolii A.; Drozd, Victor E.; Malkov, Anatolii A.; Smirnov, Vladimir M. (1 December 2015). "From V. B. Aleskovskii's "Framework" Hypothesis to the Method of Molecular Layering/Atomic Layer Deposition". Chemical Vapor Deposition. 21 (10–11–12): 216–240. doi:10.1002/cvde.201502013. ISSN 1521-3862.
  101. ^ Heirtzler, James R.; Le Pichon, Xavier; Baron, J. Gregory (1966). "Magnetic anomalies over the Reykjanes Ridge". Deep-Sea Research. 13 (3): 427–32. Bibcode:1966DSRA...13..427H. doi:10.1016/0011-7471(66)91078-3.
  102. ^ Citations in article "Conductive polymers".
  103. ^ Sean Carrol, The Particle at the End of the Universe: The Hunt for the Higgs and the Discovery of a New World, Dutton, 2012, p.228. [6]
  104. ^ Migdal, A. A.; Polyakov, A. M. (July 1966). "Spontaneous Breakdown of Strong Interaction Symmetry and Absence of Massless Particles" (PDF). JETP. 51: 135. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2013. (English translation: Soviet Physics JETP, vol. 24, p. 1, January 1967.)
  105. ^ Navarro, Gonzalo (2001). "A guided tour to approximate string matching" (PDF). ACM Computing Surveys. 33 (1): 31–88. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.452.6317. doi:10.1145/375360.375365. S2CID 207551224.
  106. ^ Joshua Rothman, "The Rules of the Game: How does science really work?" (review of Michael Strevens, The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science, Liveright), The New Yorker, 5 October 2020, pp. 67–71. (p. 68.)
  107. ^ See Garey & Johnson, Computers and intractability, p. 119.
    Cf. also the survey article by Trakhtenbrot (see "External Links").
    Levin emigrated to the U.S. in 1978.
  108. ^ D. J. Gross, F. Wilczek, Ultraviolet behavior of non-abeilan gauge theoreies Archived 5 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Physical Review Letters 30 (1973) 1343–1346; H. D. Politzer, Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions Archived 30 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine, Physical Review Letters 30 (1973) 1346–1349
  109. ^ Israel Rosenfield and [dward Ziff, "Epigenetics: The Evolution Revolution", The New York Review of Books, vol. LXV, no. 10 (7 June 2018), pp. 36,38.
  110. ^ Endo, Akira; Kuroda, M.; Tsujita, Y. (1976). "ML-236A, ML-236B, and ML-236C, new inhibitors of cholesterogenesis produced by Penicillium citrinium". The Journal of Antibiotics. 29 (12): 1346–8. doi:10.7164/antibiotics.29.1346. PMID 1010803.
  111. ^ Brown, Alian G.; Smale, Terry C.; King, Trevor J.; Hasenkamp, Rainer; Thompson, Ronald H. (1976). "Crystal and Molecular Structure of Compactin, a New Antifungal Metabolite from Penicillium brevicompactum". J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (11): 1165–1170. doi:10.1039/P19760001165. PMID 945291.
  112. ^ Alvarez, L W; Alvarez, W; Asaro, F; Michel, H V (1980). "Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction" (PDF). Science. 208 (4448): 1095–1108. Bibcode:1980Sci...208.1095A. doi:10.1126/science.208.4448.1095. PMID 17783054. S2CID 16017767.
  113. ^ Peter Brannen, "The Worst Times on Earth: Mass extinctions send us a warning about the future of life on this planet", Scientific American, vol. 323, no. 3 (September 2020), pp. 74–81. (The Smit–Hertogen independent discovery is referenced on p. 80.)
  114. ^ Gallo, R. C.; Sarin, P. S.; Gelmann, E. P.; Robert-Guroff, M.; Richardson, E.; Kalyanaraman, V. S.; Mann, D.; Sidhu, G. D.; Stahl, R. E.; Zolla-Pazner, S.; Leibowitch, J.; Popovic, M. (1983). "Isolation of human T-cell leukemia virus in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)". Science. 220 (4599): 865–867. Bibcode:1983Sci...220..865G. doi:10.1126/science.6601823. PMID 6601823.
  115. ^ Barré-Sinoussi, F.; Chermann, J. C.; Rey, F.; Nugeyre, M. T.; Chamaret, S.; Gruest, J.; Dauguet, C.; Axler-Blin, C.; Vézinet-Brun, F.; Rouzioux, C.; Rozenbaum, W.; Montagnier, L. (1983). "Isolation of a T-lymphotropic retrovirus from a patient at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)". Science. 220 (4599): 868–871. Bibcode:1983Sci...220..868B. doi:10.1126/science.6189183. PMID 6189183. S2CID 390173.
  116. ^ "The 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - Press Release". www.nobelprize.org. Retrieved 28 January 2018.
  117. ^ Levy, J. A.; et al. (1984). "Isolation of lymphocytopathic retroviruses from San Francisco patients with AIDS". Science. 225 (4664): 840–842. Bibcode:1984Sci...225..840L. doi:10.1126/science.6206563. PMID 6206563.
  118. ^ Levy, J. A.; Kaminsky, L. S.; Morrow, W. J.; Steimer, K.; Luciw, P.; Dina, D.; Hoxie, J.; Oshiro, L. (1985). "Infection by the retrovirus associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome". Annals of Internal Medicine. 103 (5): 694–699. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-103-5-694. PMID 2996401.
  119. ^ Tim Folger, "The Quantum Hack: Quantum computers will render today's cryptographic methods obsolete. What happens then?" Scientific American, vol. 314, no. 2 (February 2016), pp. 50, 53.
  120. ^ David H. Levy, "My Life as a Comet Hunter: The need to pass a French test, of all things, spurred half a century of cosmic sleuthing", Scientific American, vol. 314, no. 2 (February 2016), pp. 70–71.
  121. ^ See EATCS on the Gödel Prize 1995 Archived 4 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine.
  122. ^ Christopher Kasparek, "Psychiatry and Special Interests", The Psychiatric Times, February 1991, p. 6.
  123. ^ Van Os et al, NRC Handelsblad, 2015, laten we de diagnose schizofrenie vergeten http://www.nrc.nl/handelsblad/2015/03/07/laten-we-de-diagnose-schizofrenie-vergeten-1472619
  124. ^ Os, Jim van (2 February 2016). ""Schizophrenia" does not exist". BMJ. 352: i375. doi:10.1136/bmj.i375. ISSN 1756-1833. PMID 26837945. S2CID 116098585.
  125. ^ Imbens, Guido W.; Angrist, Joshua D. (1994). "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects". Econometrica. 62 (2): 467–475. doi:10.2307/2951620. ISSN 0012-9682. JSTOR 2951620.
  126. ^ Baker, Stuart G.; Lindeman, Karen S. (15 November 1994). "The paired availability design: A proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor". Statistics in Medicine. 13 (21): 2269–2278. doi:10.1002/sim.4780132108. ISSN 0277-6715. PMID 7846425.
  127. ^ Baker, Stuart G.; Lindeman, Karen S. (2 April 2024). "Multiple Discoveries in Causal Inference: LATE for the Party". CHANCE. 37 (2): 21–25. doi:10.1080/09332480.2024.2348956. ISSN 0933-2480. PMC 11218811. PMID 38957370.
  128. ^ Paál, G.; Horváth, I.; Lukács, B. (1992). "Inflation and compactification from Galaxy redshifts?". Astrophysics and Space Science. 191 (1): 107–124. Bibcode:1992Ap&SS.191..107P. doi:10.1007/BF00644200. S2CID 116951785.
  129. ^ Richard Panek, "The Cosmic Surprise: Scientists discovered dark energy 25 years ago. They're still trying to figure out what it is", Scientific American, vol. 329, no.5 (December 2023), pp. 62–71.
  130. ^ In regard to his "cosmological constant", "Einstein ... blundered twice: by introducing the cosmological constant for the wrong reason [to maintain a static universe, before the advent of the Big Bang theory] and again by throwing it out instead of exploring its implications [including an accelerating universe]." Lawrence M. Krauss, "What Einstein Got Wrong: Cosmology", Scientific American, vol. 313, no. 3 (September 2015), p. 55.
  131. ^ Randerson, James; Sample, Ian (6 October 2015). "Kajita and McDonald win Nobel physics prize for work on neutrinos". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 October 2015.
  132. ^ Jerome Groopman, "The Body Strikes Back" (review of Matt Richtel, An Elegant Defense: The Extraordinary New Science of the Immune System: A Tale in Four Lives, William Morrow, 425 pp.; and Daniel M. Davis, The Beautiful Cure: The Revolution in Immunology and What It Means for Your Health, University of Chicago Press, 260 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXVI, no. 5 (21 March 2019), pp. 22–24.
  133. ^ Ford, Kevin; Green, Ben; Konyagin, Sergei; Tao, Terence (2016). "Large gaps between consecutive prime numbers". Annals of Mathematics. 183 (3): 935–974. arXiv:1408.4505. doi:10.4007/annals.2016.183.3.4. S2CID 16336889.
  134. ^ Maynard, James (21 August 2014). "Large gaps between primes". arXiv:1408.5110 [math.NT].
  135. ^ [7] Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020.
  136. ^ Cohen, J. (4 June 2018). "With prestigious prize, an overshadowed CRISPR researcher wins the spotlight". Science. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
  137. ^ "Lithuanian scientists not awarded Nobel prize despite discovering same technology". LRT.lt. 8 October 2020.
  138. ^ "Surprise! It's a Nobel Prize", UCSF Magazine, Winter 2022, pp. 28–29.
  139. ^ Casey Cep, "The Perfecter: A new biography of Thomas Edison recalibrates our understanding of the inventor's genius", The New Yorker, 28 October 2019, pp. 72–77. (p. 76.) Casey Cep makes reference to Robert K. Merton's concept of multiple discoveries, adding: "The problems of the age attract the problem solvers of the age, all of whom work more or less within the same constraints and avail themselves of the same existing theories and technologies." (p. 76.)

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]