Landfill fire: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Infamously (talk | contribs) m added province for context Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source |
|||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Waste ignition}} |
|||
A '''landfill fire''' occurs when [[waste]] disposed of in a [[landfill]] ignites and spreads. In landfills that do not cover their waste with [[daily cover]], biological [[decomposition]] creates substantial heat and can cause material in the landfills to spontaneously combust. In the U.S. 40% of landfill fires are attributed to arson.{{ref|us}} |
|||
A '''landfill fire''' occurs when [[waste]] disposed of in a [[landfill]] ignites and spreads. Two types of landfills fires are generally recognized – surface fires and deep-seated fires. Surface fires typically occur in underdeveloped countries that lack capacity to properly cover waste with inert daily and intermediate cover. Modern examples of such fires include the Deonar and Ghazipur Landfills in India, Cerro Patacon Landfill in Panama and the New Providence Landfill in the Bahamas. |
|||
In landfills that do not cover their waste with [[daily cover]], air intrusion provides the oxygen required for increased biological activity [[decomposition]] that creates substantial heat and can cause material in the landfills to spontaneously combust.{{citation needed|date=December 2015}}. If unchecked, spontaneous combustion fires in particular tend to burn deeper into the waste mass, resulting in deep seated fires. In the U.S. 40% of landfill fires are attributed to arson.<ref name=us>[http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/tfrs/v1i18-508.pdf U.S. Fire Administration - Landfill Fires] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090320013718/http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/tfrs/v1i18-508.pdf |date=2009-03-20 }}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Landfill fires are especially dangerous as they can emit dangerous fumes from the combustion of the wide range of materials contained within the landfill. Key parameters of concern are carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, volatile organics. Production of [[dioxin]]s and [[furan]]s is also a documented risk factor. |
|||
| ⚫ | Nearby streams can be threatened by [[leachate]] pools which may form if water is used to extinguish fires in landfills. There is also the danger that the landfill's [[Landfill liner|membrane]], a barrier placed under most modern landfills to prevent contamination of the underlying ground, will be destroyed or penetrated by the fire itself. Normally this liner prevents harmful liquids contained within the landfill from escaping into the groundwater and nearby streams. Destruction of the liner therefore leads to serious environmental problems. |
||
| ⚫ | Subsurface landfill fires also, unlike a typical fire, are difficult to put out with water unless an overhaul operation is undertaken. They are similar to [[coal seam fire]]s and [[Peat#Peat fires|peat fires]]. Oxygen intrusion control is the best method to prevent and fight subsurface landfill fires as long as the fire fighting team can be confident that all air entry pathways are effectively blocked. "Fuel quenching", by allowing [[landfill gas]] build-up, can work well, especially in conjunction with maintenance of the [[daily cover]] of soil or material places on landfills. However, this oxygen suppression method can be compromised if cracks develop in the soil cover due to settlement. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | Nearby streams can be threatened by [[leachate]] pools which may form if water is used to extinguish fires in landfills. for this reason, recirculation of fire fighting water should be considered to minimize environmental impacts. There is also the danger that the landfill's [[Landfill liner|membrane]], a barrier placed under most modern landfills to prevent contamination of the underlying ground, will be destroyed or penetrated by the fire itself. Normally this liner prevents harmful liquids contained within the landfill from escaping into the groundwater and nearby streams. Destruction of the liner therefore leads to serious environmental problems. |
||
| ⚫ | *An underground landfill fire that was discovered in December 1996 in [[Danbury, Connecticut]] caused a strong odor like rotten eggs due to the high concentration of [[hydrogen sulfide]]. The fire lasted for weeks and the town was forced to install a gas recovery system, the cost of which exceeded $1 million. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | *In early November 1999, at the Delta Shake and Shingle Landfill in [[North Delta, British Columbia]]. |
||
| ⚫ | *On January 26, 1998, in [[Maalaea, Hawaii]], a fire {{convert|15-20|ft|m|abbr=on}} underground. The fire was eventually deemed to be extinguished in a matter of weeks, with injections of more than 1,000 pounds of liquid carbon dioxide. It continued to smolder for four months.<ref>“Ma’alaea Landfill Fire Sparks State Effort To Develop Guidelines,” Environment Hawai’i, Inc., Volume 9, Number 4, October 1998.</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | *An underground landfill fire that was discovered in December 1996 in [[Danbury, Connecticut]] caused a strong odor like rotten eggs due to the high concentration of [[hydrogen sulfide]]. The fire lasted for weeks and the town was forced to install a gas recovery system, the cost of which exceeded $1 million.<ref name=us/> |
||
| ⚫ | *In early November 1999, at the Delta Shake and Shingle Landfill in [[North Delta, British Columbia]]. The fire burned {{convert|20-30|m|ft|abbr=on}} deep. On November 27, Delta's Mayor declared a state of local emergency. Extinguishing the fire took slightly more than two months and cost more than $4 million (Canadian).<ref>T. Sperling, [http://wasteage.com/mag/waste_fighting_landfill_fire/ "Fighting a Landfill Fire"], Waste Age magazine, Jan. 1, 2001</ref> |
||
*On September 2, 2007 a large fire at the regional landfill in [[Fredericton, New Brunswick]] forced residents to stay indoors because of fears the smoke could be toxic.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-landfill-fire-contained-officials-say-1.639148 |title=Fredericton landfill fire contained, officials say |website=www.cbc.ca |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070904202346/http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/09/02/landfill-fire.html |archive-date=September 4, 2007}}</ref> |
|||
* On December 23, 2010, [[Republic Services]] reported elevated gas extraction well temperatures, indicative of a smoldering landfill fire, at [[West Lake Landfill]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dnr.mo.gov/env/swmp/facilities/BridgetonSanitaryLandfill-Background.htm|title=Missouri Department of Natural Resources|website=dnr.mo.gov|access-date=19 April 2018}}</ref> The smoldering fire continues to burn today{{when|date=April 2024}}, which has involved the Environmental Protection Agency, Missouri's Attorney General Chris Koster, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, and St. Louis County Department of Health. The smoldering fire is estimated to be roughly 1,000 feet away from radioactive wastes illegally dumped at the landfill in 1973.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.epa.gov/region7/cleanup/west_lake_landfill/index.htm#.VaQSB65Viko|title=West Lake Landfill|website=US Environmental Protection Agency|access-date=19 April 2018}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
*On September 2, 2007 a large fire at the [[Fredericton]] Regional Landfill forced residents to stay indoors because of fears the smoke could be toxic.[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/09/02/landfill-fire.html] |
|||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
*On June 21, 2012, a fire erupted near the [[Saratoga Springs, Utah|Saratoga Springs]] landfill and is blazing through the outskirts of Saratoga Springs.[http://www.heraldextra.com/dump-fire-percent-contained-crews-settle-in-for-the-night/article_4fbcd7bd-d70c-56a4-bf28-f29e03758dd3.html] |
|||
*{{Commons category-inline}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{note|m}}“Ma’alaea Landfill Fire Sparks State Effort To Develop Guidelines,” Environment Hawai’i, Inc., Volume 9, Number 4, October 1998.<br /> |
|||
{{note|us}} [http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/downloads/pdf/tfrs/v1i18-508.pdf U.S. Fire Administration - Landfill Fires]<br /> |
|||
{{note|d}} T. Sperling, [http://wasteage.com/mag/waste_fighting_landfill_fire/ "Fighting a Landfill Fire"], Waste Age magazine, Jan. 1, 2001 |
|||
[[Category:Landfill]] |
[[Category:Landfill|Fire]] |
||
[[Category:Types of fire]] |
[[Category:Types of fire]] |
||
[[de:Deponie#Umweltbelastung]] |
[[de:Deponie#Umweltbelastung]] |
||
[[fr:Feu de décharge]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:25, 5 December 2024
A landfill fire occurs when waste disposed of in a landfill ignites and spreads. Two types of landfills fires are generally recognized – surface fires and deep-seated fires. Surface fires typically occur in underdeveloped countries that lack capacity to properly cover waste with inert daily and intermediate cover. Modern examples of such fires include the Deonar and Ghazipur Landfills in India, Cerro Patacon Landfill in Panama and the New Providence Landfill in the Bahamas.
In landfills that do not cover their waste with daily cover, air intrusion provides the oxygen required for increased biological activity decomposition that creates substantial heat and can cause material in the landfills to spontaneously combust.[citation needed]. If unchecked, spontaneous combustion fires in particular tend to burn deeper into the waste mass, resulting in deep seated fires. In the U.S. 40% of landfill fires are attributed to arson.[1]
Landfill fires are especially dangerous as they can emit dangerous fumes from the combustion of the wide range of materials contained within the landfill. Key parameters of concern are carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, volatile organics. Production of dioxins and furans is also a documented risk factor.
Subsurface landfill fires also, unlike a typical fire, are difficult to put out with water unless an overhaul operation is undertaken. They are similar to coal seam fires and peat fires. Oxygen intrusion control is the best method to prevent and fight subsurface landfill fires as long as the fire fighting team can be confident that all air entry pathways are effectively blocked. "Fuel quenching", by allowing landfill gas build-up, can work well, especially in conjunction with maintenance of the daily cover of soil or material places on landfills. However, this oxygen suppression method can be compromised if cracks develop in the soil cover due to settlement.
Nearby streams can be threatened by leachate pools which may form if water is used to extinguish fires in landfills. for this reason, recirculation of fire fighting water should be considered to minimize environmental impacts. There is also the danger that the landfill's membrane, a barrier placed under most modern landfills to prevent contamination of the underlying ground, will be destroyed or penetrated by the fire itself. Normally this liner prevents harmful liquids contained within the landfill from escaping into the groundwater and nearby streams. Destruction of the liner therefore leads to serious environmental problems.
Notable landfill fires
[edit]- On January 26, 1998, in Maalaea, Hawaii, a fire 15–20 ft (4.6–6.1 m) underground. The fire was eventually deemed to be extinguished in a matter of weeks, with injections of more than 1,000 pounds of liquid carbon dioxide. It continued to smolder for four months.[2]
- An underground landfill fire that was discovered in December 1996 in Danbury, Connecticut caused a strong odor like rotten eggs due to the high concentration of hydrogen sulfide. The fire lasted for weeks and the town was forced to install a gas recovery system, the cost of which exceeded $1 million.[1]
- In early November 1999, at the Delta Shake and Shingle Landfill in North Delta, British Columbia. The fire burned 20–30 m (66–98 ft) deep. On November 27, Delta's Mayor declared a state of local emergency. Extinguishing the fire took slightly more than two months and cost more than $4 million (Canadian).[3]
- On September 2, 2007 a large fire at the regional landfill in Fredericton, New Brunswick forced residents to stay indoors because of fears the smoke could be toxic.[4]
- On December 23, 2010, Republic Services reported elevated gas extraction well temperatures, indicative of a smoldering landfill fire, at West Lake Landfill.[5] The smoldering fire continues to burn today[when?], which has involved the Environmental Protection Agency, Missouri's Attorney General Chris Koster, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, and St. Louis County Department of Health. The smoldering fire is estimated to be roughly 1,000 feet away from radioactive wastes illegally dumped at the landfill in 1973.[6]
References
[edit]- ^ a b U.S. Fire Administration - Landfill Fires Archived 2009-03-20 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ “Ma’alaea Landfill Fire Sparks State Effort To Develop Guidelines,” Environment Hawai’i, Inc., Volume 9, Number 4, October 1998.
- ^ T. Sperling, "Fighting a Landfill Fire", Waste Age magazine, Jan. 1, 2001
- ^ "Fredericton landfill fire contained, officials say". www.cbc.ca. Archived from the original on September 4, 2007.
- ^ "Missouri Department of Natural Resources". dnr.mo.gov. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
- ^ "West Lake Landfill". US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 19 April 2018.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Landfill fire at Wikimedia Commons
