Jump to content

Talk:Casta: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (High) (Rater)
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talkheader}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Mexico|class=C|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Sociology|class=C|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Mexico|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Spain|class=C|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Spain|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups |importance=low}}
}}
{{MexCnom}}
{{MexCnom}}
{{Transwikied to Wiktionary}}
{{Transwikied to Wiktionary}}
Line 14: Line 20:
| minthreadsleft = 2
| minthreadsleft = 2
}}
}}
{{PageViews graph | 90 |Casta| en.wikipedia.org}}
{{Auto archiving notice|=Lowercase sigmabot III|age= |units= 1 year}}

== The word CASTA has nothing to do with "character and quality" Also your refs do not imply such things ==

The system of castas, or genízaros, was based on the principle that the character and quality of people varied according largely to their "birth, color, race and origin of ethnic types"

What does "character and quality" have to do with the words "race,colour,birth"?
The portugueses created the word Casta to sort of the slaves they owned, the portuguese owned slaves from all different races such as Indians,africans,japanese ect, they then sorted them by age of birth, the colour of a slave was more for saleability for sex slavery which the portugueseagain where famous for, hence Casta actual orginal meaning was Race,Colour,Birth... NOT CHARACTER AND QUALITY, checked your ref and nothing implys Character and Quality.remove it[[Special:Contributions/92.236.96.38|92.236.96.38]] ([[User talk:92.236.96.38|talk]]) 16:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Caplock


==Recent edits by anonymous IP==
:I don't have the original citation, but likely it referred to ''calidad''. A person's perceived ''calidad'' could raise or lower their public perception and which racial category they were assigned or could pass for. See the discussion in Ben Vinson III: "As readily as the concepts of ''nación'' and ''casta'' were used interchangeably, so too were the designations of ''calidad'', ''clase'', ''raza'', condición'', and ''casta''. Vinson, ''Before Mestizaje: The Frontiers of Race and Caste in Colonial Mexico''. New York: Cambridge University Press 2018, 57. I hope this helps. [[User:Amuseclio|Amuseclio]] ([[User talk:Amuseclio|talk]]) 19:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio


Following on the discussion above between, it seems the specialist academic consensus now is that the caste system did not exist and that it is an erroneous historical concept. I don't see a case for arguing the sentence referring to it as a "discredited concept" as being "an unsourced intepretation" by past editors. It is, if anything, a more subtle way of saying what sources themselves are saying - that it is simply wrong. I have found a couple of more sources on this debate which may be relevant, which can be shared on the continuation of this discussion. One of them, a recent Mexican source, claims that although Gonzalbo is right in saying there was no Caste system, there was nevertheless in the 18th century a Caste narrative. [[User:Ivan evlogiev|Ivan evlogiev]] ([[User talk:Ivan evlogiev|talk]]) 11:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
==The Casta System did not exist as portrayed in this article==
This article is sheer fantasy. There was never "a formal racial hierarchy" in Latin America. The Casta system is a Anglo-Saxon myth. There was no legal institution of such a system. In fact, many Spanish immigrants were the servants of rich Mestizos and Mulatos in New Spain. I'll allow for a discussion before I start removing unsourced nonsense. [[User:Negin2019|Negin2019]] ([[User talk:Negin2019|talk]]) 14:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
:I have added text with scholarly citations to the fluidity and flexibility of the racial categories. It was not a system of fixed terminology in time or place, but the labels and hierarchies of casta painting have given the impression that the categories were rigid and immutable. I think removing the duplicate descriptions of racial categories would improve the article. Most terms in the short list are linked to full articles that readers can consult. [[User:Amuseclio|Amuseclio]] ([[User talk:Amuseclio|talk]]) 22:00, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio


Removing descriptions of racial categories altogether is warranted since they are total fiction. They were never used outside of those paintings. We certainly need more detail on the works of Gonzalbo and other Latin American authors. This article suffers from Anglo-bias and distortion. Spanish language sources are absolutely necessary here.[[Special:Contributions/176.85.217.174|176.85.217.174]] ([[User talk:176.85.217.174|talk]]) 14:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


Right but to make such a claim, you must have a quantified, verified amount of studies to support that this new narrative is the consensus. Meanwhile, there are still professors at the UNAM and other universities who’ve written about institutionalized discrimination regardless of the concept lacking a proper term to designate such discrimination. Ergo, I do not believe it is “the consensus” quite yet. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2603:8082:4A40:15:58E9:E20F:867B:8F23|2603:8082:4A40:15:58E9:E20F:867B:8F23]] ([[User talk:2603:8082:4A40:15:58E9:E20F:867B:8F23#top|talk]]) 23:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Call for discussion of deleted text without discussion ==


:Hi. This concept is fake. The Spanish territories never had a racist classification model. The introduction of the racial way of thinking was made by the French Bourbons and the illustration influence they brought to Spain and its territories starting in the XVIII century, but they were never fully accepted by the population as the majority did not match in a single race classification as the Hispanic citizens have been and were completely mixed between natives, blacks and Spanish Europeans contrary to the rest of Europeans or British that did not mix. The blacks and natives were humans as the rest of subjects of the crown and could marry between blacks, whites, natives no limits.
I do not want to engage in an editing war with multiple reverts with an unknown Wiki editor, but user 176.85.217.174 has reverted significant text without any kind of community discussion on the talk page. Since this person is an apparently unregistered Wiki editor, I cannot go to the person's talk page to discuss the person's actions, and the editor has not contacted me on mine. I agree that the notion of a fixed casta "system" has been examined by historians, and I have gone to the works of a number with citations how un-rigid the classifications were. Along with deleting text the user does not approve of, s/he also deleted images from casta paintings that show how elites conceived of persons slotted into the racial categories. These are worthwhile seeing as historical artifacts and placing them in the Wiki article does not suggest that they are true representations. Intellectual history and art history use such evidence to understand they way people (in this case elites) thought. Cultural historians have used casta paintings to understand material culture. I would like to engage in a civil community discussion here on the talk page. I am open to reworking the lengthy section on casta categories, but to have the whole section blanked is not acceptable without discussion. [[User:Amuseclio|Amuseclio]] ([[User talk:Amuseclio|talk]]) 17:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio
:There are examples for you to see that the Hispanic model wasn’t based on race: Teresa Juliana de Santo Domingo, San Martín de Porres, beatriz de palacios, Juan garrido, Estevanico, Juan de Villanueva, Beatriz de Palacios, Juan Valiente, Juan Beltrán, Pedro Fulupo, Juan Bardales, Antonio Pérez, Gomez de Leon, Leonor Galiano, Juan Garcia [[Special:Contributions/194.38.172.194|194.38.172.194]] ([[User talk:194.38.172.194|talk]]) 07:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
:Juan Latino is another example being the first black African who studied at a European university and who reached a professorship [[Special:Contributions/194.38.172.194|194.38.172.194]] ([[User talk:194.38.172.194|talk]]) 14:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
:I arrived at this article as a result of reading about [[Francisco de Miranda]]. His father was forced to prove his pure bloodline, but even then he faced discrimination for his non-Spanish origin. Whether you call it a caste system, a class system, or an old boys club, makes no difference. [[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humpster]] ([[User talk:Humphrey Tribble|talk]]) 06:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
::It wasn't discrimination for "non-Spanish" origin [[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humpster]]. Spaniards in Spain were subject to the same requirements and many - perhaps most - did not meet them. You are mistaking the Statutes of Limpieza de Sangre with the supposed Caste System. [[Special:Contributions/91.167.249.45|91.167.249.45]] ([[User talk:91.167.249.45|talk]]) 00:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
:::No mistake. Call it "purity of blood" if you like. A pecking order certainly existed. [[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humpster]] ([[User talk:Humphrey Tribble|talk]]) 03:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


Not really. Peruvian indigenous nobility were also declared "pure of blood old christians", so the racial component is questionable to say the least. [[Special:Contributions/203.7.11.228|203.7.11.228]] ([[User talk:203.7.11.228|talk]]) 12:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
==On Espanoles==
Espanoles in the caste categorization referred to Criollos. I have fixed this mistake. It did not refer to peninsulares. I have fixed this.--[[Special:Contributions/83.51.46.1|83.51.46.1]] ([[User talk:83.51.46.1|talk]]) 18:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations==
==Need to explain the link between Race and purity of blood==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Carolina_at_Greensboro/ARH_371_The_TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural_Representations_(Spring_2024) | assignments = [[User:Naviarfoster|Naviarfoster]] | start_date = 2024-01-09 | end_date = 2024-05-02 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Naviarfoster|Naviarfoster]] ([[User talk:Naviarfoster|talk]]) 21:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)</span>
Ultimately, the link is based on the division in Spain between Old Christians and New Christians. Those of Moorish, Jewish, Black, Indian background were lumped together not so much because of their racial background but because of their background as people who have not been Christian for various generations. This is hard to explain but is useful to disentangle the confused link between both concepts. When Spanish Americans began to become acquainted with the concept of race, the idea of purity of blood fit in well with that of race and there was a natural progression from one to the other. --[[User:Php2000|Php2000]] ([[User talk:Php2000|talk]]) 18:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:04, 5 December 2024

Mexico Collaboration This article is a candidate for the Mexico Collaboration. Please visit that page to support or comment on the nomination.

Recent edits by anonymous IP

[edit]

Following on the discussion above between, it seems the specialist academic consensus now is that the caste system did not exist and that it is an erroneous historical concept. I don't see a case for arguing the sentence referring to it as a "discredited concept" as being "an unsourced intepretation" by past editors. It is, if anything, a more subtle way of saying what sources themselves are saying - that it is simply wrong. I have found a couple of more sources on this debate which may be relevant, which can be shared on the continuation of this discussion. One of them, a recent Mexican source, claims that although Gonzalbo is right in saying there was no Caste system, there was nevertheless in the 18th century a Caste narrative. Ivan evlogiev (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Right but to make such a claim, you must have a quantified, verified amount of studies to support that this new narrative is the consensus. Meanwhile, there are still professors at the UNAM and other universities who’ve written about institutionalized discrimination regardless of the concept lacking a proper term to designate such discrimination. Ergo, I do not believe it is “the consensus” quite yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8082:4A40:15:58E9:E20F:867B:8F23 (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This concept is fake. The Spanish territories never had a racist classification model. The introduction of the racial way of thinking was made by the French Bourbons and the illustration influence they brought to Spain and its territories starting in the XVIII century, but they were never fully accepted by the population as the majority did not match in a single race classification as the Hispanic citizens have been and were completely mixed between natives, blacks and Spanish Europeans contrary to the rest of Europeans or British that did not mix. The blacks and natives were humans as the rest of subjects of the crown and could marry between blacks, whites, natives no limits.
There are examples for you to see that the Hispanic model wasn’t based on race: Teresa Juliana de Santo Domingo, San Martín de Porres, beatriz de palacios, Juan garrido, Estevanico, Juan de Villanueva, Beatriz de Palacios, Juan Valiente, Juan Beltrán, Pedro Fulupo, Juan Bardales, Antonio Pérez, Gomez de Leon, Leonor Galiano, Juan Garcia 194.38.172.194 (talk) 07:42, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Juan Latino is another example being the first black African who studied at a European university and who reached a professorship 194.38.172.194 (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I arrived at this article as a result of reading about Francisco de Miranda. His father was forced to prove his pure bloodline, but even then he faced discrimination for his non-Spanish origin. Whether you call it a caste system, a class system, or an old boys club, makes no difference. Humpster (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't discrimination for "non-Spanish" origin Humpster. Spaniards in Spain were subject to the same requirements and many - perhaps most - did not meet them. You are mistaking the Statutes of Limpieza de Sangre with the supposed Caste System. 91.167.249.45 (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No mistake. Call it "purity of blood" if you like. A pecking order certainly existed. Humpster (talk) 03:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Peruvian indigenous nobility were also declared "pure of blood old christians", so the racial component is questionable to say the least. 203.7.11.228 (talk) 12:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Naviarfoster (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Naviarfoster (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]