Jump to content

Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky/Archive 5. (BOT)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

{{tph|noarchive=yes|search=no}}
{{tph|noarchive=yes|search=no}}
{{Article history
{{Article history
Line 39: Line 38:
{{WikiProject Dance|Ballet=y|Ballet-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Dance|Ballet=y|Ballet-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=Top|perform=yes}}
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=Top|perform=yes}}
{{WikiProject LGBT studies|person=yes}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies|person=yes}}
{{WikiProject Music theory|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Music theory|importance=high}}
}}
}}
Line 72: Line 71:
#[[/Archive 4|January 2015-March 2019]]
#[[/Archive 4|January 2015-March 2019]]
#[[/Archive 5|May 2019-]]}}
#[[/Archive 5|May 2019-]]}}

== English name ==

Why does the article have his name as Tchaikovsky when the Russian spelling starts with Ч? Very clearly it should be Chaikovsky. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LarsMarius|LarsMarius]] ([[User talk:LarsMarius#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LarsMarius|contribs]]) 23:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:[[WP:COMMONNAME]]. Sometimes it is romanized as "tch", in some languages it is the case. [[User:Mellk|Mellk]] ([[User talk:Mellk|talk]]) 23:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
::In fact I would say that the romanisation is virtually always "tch..."; I have never seen the composer's name spelt Chaikovsky in any English language publication. [[User:Sbishop|Sbishop]] ([[User talk:Sbishop|talk]]) 08:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
:::I suggest you read more widely, e.g. ''[[The Joy of Music]]''. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 08:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
:::I meant in general for the letter "ч", but in this case it is often "tch". [[User:Mellk|Mellk]] ([[User talk:Mellk|talk]]) 12:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
::::I meant that Bernstein consistently uses "Chaikovsky", and he's not alone. -- [[User:Michael Bednarek|Michael Bednarek]] ([[User talk:Michael Bednarek|talk]]) 12:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
:Maybe alternative romanizations could be placed in an EFN? <b><span style="color:#0080FB">Invading</span><span style="color:#0668E1">Invader</span></b> ([[User:InvadingInvader|userpage]], [[User talk:InvadingInvader|talk]]) 02:05, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
::I think that's a great idea. —&nbsp;[[User:Shibbolethink|<span style="color: black">Shibboleth</span><span style="color: maroon">ink</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Shibbolethink|♔]]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Shibbolethink|♕]])</sup> 17:10, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

* The combination tch- in initial position is unknown in English and very rare in other languages. The composer's name was long spelt in the German way, as Tschaikowsky. Then, someone decided we anglophones could do without teutonic influences, and changed the w to v, and the Tsch to Tch. But why not plain Ch? I can only assume it was to distinguish it from the /x/ sound, usually spelt as ch (as in loch, l'chaim, etc). But it solved a non-existent problem; nobody ever said "Khaikovsky". Whatever, "Tchaikovsky" is here to stay. We also have Tcherepnin et a few al. But not Tchekhov, at least not anymore. -- [[User:JackofOz|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Jack of Oz</span>]] [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<span style="font-size:85%; font-family: Verdana;"><sup>[pleasantries]</sup></span>]] 01:00, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

== Was not able to edit this page ==

I wanted to add a wikilink to this article, but found that it is locked from editing. Please fix this ridiculous situation! [[Special:Contributions/173.88.246.138|173.88.246.138]] ([[User talk:173.88.246.138|talk]]) 01:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
:: Due to persistent vandalism the page is semi-protected and can be edited only by auto-confirmed users. You can become one, but in the meantime if you state here which wikilink you want inserted, another user can add it if appropriate. [[User:Sbishop|Sbishop]] ([[User talk:Sbishop|talk]]) 06:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
:::{{ping|173.88.246.138}} you could become an autoconfirmed user if you create an account and made 10 edits after 4 days. [[User:QiuLiming1|QiuLiming1]] ([[User talk:QiuLiming1|talk]]) 21:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
:::<sub>Subscript</sub> [[Special:Contributions/213.3.38.108|213.3.38.108]] ([[User talk:213.3.38.108|talk]]) 08:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)


== Relationship with Bob ==
== Relationship with Bob ==
Line 99: Line 77:


:Yes, that is confusing. [[Special:Contributions/73.141.78.51|73.141.78.51]] ([[User talk:73.141.78.51|talk]]) 17:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
:Yes, that is confusing. [[Special:Contributions/73.141.78.51|73.141.78.51]] ([[User talk:73.141.78.51|talk]]) 17:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

::I've swapped the order of the last two clauses in that sentence, which I believe removes the anachronistic implication. [[User:Matt Gies|Matt Gies]] ([[User talk:Matt Gies|talk]]) 19:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC)


== [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portr%C3%A4t_des_Komponisten_Pjotr_I._Tschaikowski_(1840-1893).jpg 1893 Portrait] ==
== [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portr%C3%A4t_des_Komponisten_Pjotr_I._Tschaikowski_(1840-1893).jpg 1893 Portrait] ==
Line 106: Line 86:
:What makes it better than the current high-quality photograph? '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">[[User:Aza24|<span style="color:darkred">Aza24</span>]][[User talk:Aza24|<span style="color:#848484"> (talk)</span>]]</span>''' 15:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:What makes it better than the current high-quality photograph? '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">[[User:Aza24|<span style="color:darkred">Aza24</span>]][[User talk:Aza24|<span style="color:#848484"> (talk)</span>]]</span>''' 15:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
::I didn't say it has to be in the lead (although perhaps that is an option), I just pointed out the option to add it to the article - perhaps at around the time soon before he died [[User:Wikieditor662|Wikieditor662]] ([[User talk:Wikieditor662|talk]]) 03:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
::I didn't say it has to be in the lead (although perhaps that is an option), I just pointed out the option to add it to the article - perhaps at around the time soon before he died [[User:Wikieditor662|Wikieditor662]] ([[User talk:Wikieditor662|talk]]) 03:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
:::It is a nice painting, and rather frequently reproduced. This article is rather-below FA standard and will need heavy revision at some point. For instance, I just trimmed some excessive images and there's still no place for the painting. We should keep this on the back burner, pending article expansion. '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">[[User:Aza24|<span style="color:darkred">Aza24</span>]][[User talk:Aza24|<span style="color:#848484"> (talk)</span>]]</span>''' 21:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

== Number of portraits ==

The number of photographs was overdoing it. But I do regret the loss of some of them. Maybe being a simple soul I like to think about people as having recongisable faces. And for that reason I regret the loss of some close associates: Chakovskiy's wife, the very importanat Nadyezhda von Meck, whose husband had made a fortune from the railway line that took Ukrainian wheat to RUssia, etc.

Could we have some of these pictures back please?
[[User:Foiled circuitous wanderer|Foiled circuitous wanderer]] ([[User talk:Foiled circuitous wanderer|talk]]) 15:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

:Not sure what you mean, Tchaikovsky's wife is still there (personal life section), as is Nadyezhda von Meck (opera composer section). '''<span style="font-family:Lucida;">[[User:Aza24|<span style="color:darkred">Aza24</span>]][[User talk:Aza24|<span style="color:#848484"> (talk)</span>]]</span>''' 23:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

== Category:Historical figures with ambiguous or disputed sexuality ==

There are various competing theories and interpretations of Tchaikovsky's sexual orientation, and I was wondering if it would be appropriate to add the [[:Category:Historical figures with ambiguous or disputed sexuality]] to connect his article with other similar discussions. I don't see this as expressing an opinion one way or another, it is simply recognizing that these historical interpretations exist. [[User:Rylee Amelia|Rylee Amelia]] ([[User talk:Rylee Amelia|talk]]) 02:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

:According to this cited passage in the article: "Biographers have generally agreed that Tchaikovsky was homosexual". There appears to be no dispute about this (I've never heard of one), despite his failed marriage to a woman. [[Simon Morrison]]'s recent biography is unequivocal about Tchaikovsky's homosexuality. He reaffirmed this [https://musicwebinternational.com/2024/07/an-interview-with-author-simon-morrison/ in an interview a few months ago]. Morrison also said that Tchaikovsky's wife knew in advance that he was gay. The only thing Morrison disputed was that the Soviets suppressed knowledge of Tchaikovsky's homosexuality. (If anything, he said that homophobia about Tchaikovsky is "mostly non-Russian".) —[[User:CurryTime7-24|CurryTime7-24]] ([[User talk:CurryTime7-24|talk]]) 02:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:58, 6 December 2024

Featured articlePyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 17, 2009.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 3, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
July 7, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 18, 2009Good article nomineeListed
March 29, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 7, 2017, and May 7, 2020.
Current status: Featured article


Relationship with Bob

[edit]

The wording of this section suggests that Tchiakovsky’s letters penned after Bob’s suicide were revealing. Tchaikovsky in fact died nearly 20 years before the suicide of Bob. 2604:3D09:1887:B000:4141:EB9:FAF1:6BBF (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is confusing. 73.141.78.51 (talk) 17:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've swapped the order of the last two clauses in that sentence, which I believe removes the anachronistic implication. Matt Gies (talk) 19:13, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we use it? It was made the same year (albeit before) he died and I think it is the only painting of him made in his lifetime. Wikieditor662 (talk) 06:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What makes it better than the current high-quality photograph? Aza24 (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say it has to be in the lead (although perhaps that is an option), I just pointed out the option to add it to the article - perhaps at around the time soon before he died Wikieditor662 (talk) 03:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is a nice painting, and rather frequently reproduced. This article is rather-below FA standard and will need heavy revision at some point. For instance, I just trimmed some excessive images and there's still no place for the painting. We should keep this on the back burner, pending article expansion. Aza24 (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number of portraits

[edit]

The number of photographs was overdoing it. But I do regret the loss of some of them. Maybe being a simple soul I like to think about people as having recongisable faces. And for that reason I regret the loss of some close associates: Chakovskiy's wife, the very importanat Nadyezhda von Meck, whose husband had made a fortune from the railway line that took Ukrainian wheat to RUssia, etc.

Could we have some of these pictures back please? Foiled circuitous wanderer (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you mean, Tchaikovsky's wife is still there (personal life section), as is Nadyezhda von Meck (opera composer section). Aza24 (talk) 23:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Historical figures with ambiguous or disputed sexuality

[edit]

There are various competing theories and interpretations of Tchaikovsky's sexual orientation, and I was wondering if it would be appropriate to add the Category:Historical figures with ambiguous or disputed sexuality to connect his article with other similar discussions. I don't see this as expressing an opinion one way or another, it is simply recognizing that these historical interpretations exist. Rylee Amelia (talk) 02:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this cited passage in the article: "Biographers have generally agreed that Tchaikovsky was homosexual". There appears to be no dispute about this (I've never heard of one), despite his failed marriage to a woman. Simon Morrison's recent biography is unequivocal about Tchaikovsky's homosexuality. He reaffirmed this in an interview a few months ago. Morrison also said that Tchaikovsky's wife knew in advance that he was gay. The only thing Morrison disputed was that the Soviets suppressed knowledge of Tchaikovsky's homosexuality. (If anything, he said that homophobia about Tchaikovsky is "mostly non-Russian".) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:59, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]