Talk:Nuclear weapon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:19, 6 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nuclear weapon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 3 months

Nuclear weapon is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 13, 2004.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2004	Refreshing brilliant prose	Kept
May 26, 2005	Featured article review	Kept
April 29, 2006	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
May 2, 2007	Featured article review	Demoted
July 15, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 13, 2017	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Former featured article

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Physics High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lesotelo1218 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MatthieuFoucu (article contribs). Peer reviewers: VAV1210, TheEditor0702.

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation

Add more relevance in the role that several other scientists had in the creation for example, Oppenheimer, Einstein, etc. QSpangenburg6 (talk) 15:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Tayhlor's role in Nuclear Science

Louise Tayhlor (DE) was the creator of the first Theoretical nuclear weapon, as stated in a book found under a library dated to further than 1923. Later on, His influence brought J.R. Oppenheimer to create the first Nuclear weapon in a physical form with assistance if Einstein and other scientists TSARcism (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies map nuclear testing section

Hey,

I noticed that in the "Nuclear testing and fallout" section of this page there is a map with nuclear explosion locations (Rael Nuclear use locations world map.png). The description of this map in this article refers to nuclear tests ("Over 2,000 nuclear tests have been conducted[...]"), however the map includes the locations of the nuclear explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This makes it seem like the nuclear attacks on Japan are referred to as tests, which outside of being inaccurate, can also be seen as disrespectful to the major historic events that happened there.

I'm not sure what the best way of resolving this is. A map that only includes tests would be nice but I don't know of any that is available to use on Wikipedia. So probably an edit of the description would be best. An older version of the picture exists on Wikimedia. The first part of its summary might be preferred over the first part of the current description: "Map of locations of Nuclear tests and use of nuclear weapons in the twentieth century. The only use of nuclear weapons in war is at Nagasaki and Hiroshima in Japan. Locations of nuclear tests or weapons as dots. Major test sites with more than 100 tests marked as large dots". I like this description, but I don't know if this is to long?

Alternatively the description could be changed to be in line with the current description of the picture in it's summary: "Over 2,000 nuclear explosions have been conducted[...]". This would be better in my opinion, but since the map is still associated with the testing section of the article, it might still leave room for wrong interpretations.

I'm not able to edit this Wikipedia article myself and I feel this isn't a minor edit, so I thought bring it up here. APainInTheAss (talk) 20:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and I've edited the picture caption. Thanks for your vigilance. John (talk) 21:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Talk header|archive_age=90|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
+{{Talk header}}
 {{ArticleHistory
 |action1=RBP
 |action1date=12:29, 19 January 2004
-|action1link=Wikipedia:Historical archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science
+|action1link=Wikipedia:Historical archive/Brilliant prose/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science
 |action1result=kept
 |action1oldid=2207128
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 {{WikiProject Military history |class=C |B-Class-1=no |B-Class-2=yes |B-Class-3=yes |B-Class-4=yes |B-Class-5=yes |Weaponry-task-force=yes}}
 {{WikiProject Physics |importance=High}}
-{{WikiProject Engineering |importance=High |past-selected-article=July 2006}}
+{{WikiProject Engineering |importance=High }}
 {{WikiProject Environment|importance=high}}
 {{WikiProject Science Policy|importance=High}}
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 <span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Thecanyon|Thecanyon]] ([[User talk:Thecanyon|talk]]) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)</span>
+== Creation ==
-== Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023 ==
+Add more relevance in the role that several other scientists had in the creation for example, Oppenheimer, Einstein, etc. [[User:QSpangenburg6|QSpangenburg6]] ([[User talk:QSpangenburg6|talk]]) 15:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
-{{edit semi-protected|Nuclear weapon|answered=yes}}
- [[User:Onichae|Onichae]] ([[User talk:Onichae|talk]]) 09:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC) add Oppenheimer and that he created the nuke
-*[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> Also, Oppenheimer is already mentioned three times in the article, including being described as the "father of the atomic bomb". --[[User:AntiDionysius|AntiDionysius]] ([[User talk:AntiDionysius|talk]]) 09:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
+== Louise Tayhlor's role in Nuclear Science ==
-== Which english? ==
+Louise Tayhlor (DE) was the creator of the first Theoretical nuclear weapon, as stated in a book found under a library dated to further than 1923. Later on, His influence brought J.R. Oppenheimer to create the first Nuclear weapon in a physical form with assistance if Einstein and other scientists [[User:TSARcism|TSARcism]] ([[User talk:TSARcism|talk]]) 09:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
-It should be stated at the top of this talk page which english type this article is written in please [[User:Iljhgtn|Iljhgtn]] ([[User talk:Iljhgtn|talk]]) 00:40, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
-== nuclear bombs ==
+== Inaccuracies map nuclear testing section ==
+Hey,
-be simple with it [[Special:Contributions/5.193.222.238|5.193.222.238]] ([[User talk:5.193.222.238|talk]]) 13:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
+I noticed that in the "Nuclear testing and fallout" section of this page there is a map with nuclear explosion locations (Rael Nuclear use locations world map.png). The description of this map in this article refers to nuclear tests ("Over 2,000 nuclear '''tests''' have been conducted[...]"), however the map includes the locations of the nuclear explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This makes it seem like the nuclear attacks on Japan are referred to as tests, which outside of being inaccurate, can also be seen as disrespectful to the major historic events that happened there.
+I'm not sure what the best way of resolving this is. A map that only includes tests would be nice but I don't know of any that is available to use on Wikipedia. So probably an edit of the description would be best. An [[commons:File:Nuclear_use_locations_world_map.PNG|older version of the picture]] exists on Wikimedia. The first part of its summary might be preferred over the first part of the current description:  "Map of locations of Nuclear tests and use of nuclear weapons in the twentieth century. The only use of nuclear weapons in war is at Nagasaki and Hiroshima in Japan. Locations of nuclear tests or weapons as dots. Major test sites with more than 100 tests marked as large dots". I like this description, but I don't know if this is to long?
+Alternatively the description could be changed to be in line with the current description of the picture in it's [[commons:File:Rael_Nuclear_use_locations_world_map.png|summary]]: "Over 2,000 nuclear '''explosions''' have been conducted[...]". This would be better in my opinion, but since the map is still associated with the testing section of the article, it might still leave room for wrong interpretations.
+I'm not able to edit this Wikipedia article myself and I feel this isn't a minor edit, so I thought bring it up here.  [[User:APainInTheAss|APainInTheAss]] ([[User talk:APainInTheAss|talk]]) 20:49, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
+: I agree and I've edited the picture caption. Thanks for your vigilance. [[User:John|John]] ([[User talk:John|talk]]) 21:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)