User talk:Peaky76: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:49, 7 December 2024

Brocklesby Stakes

Hi Peaky. Thanks for starting this article. I have added a sentence and a reference on Donovan's win in 1888. I was also thinking of starting an article on Provideo (he was British Horse of the Year in 1984), which might help. Tigerboy1966 21:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, thanks etc!

Hi, I've only recently noticed you creating good horse racing articles although I see you've actually been around for a while. Great to have someone else around doing good quality horse racing stuff. I'm always willing to copy-edit articles, add in links, review stuff although I don't have much time these days for starting new articles, so if you need a hand or want to discuss anything on the subject please give me a shout via my talk page. Cheers! --Bcp67 (talk) 11:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes, I've been around for a while, but I've recently found myself with some spare time so thought I'd try and put it to use. Horse racing is a professional and personal interest of mine, so it seemed a good place to start. It's a shame that wikipedia doesn't have the depth of articles on horse racing that it does on equivalent sports. I'm always quite surprised by some of the omissions. I will definitely give you a shout for advice. I'm still finding my way round a lot of wikipedia Peaky76 (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And great to see that you're still here 6 1/2 years on and still doing excellent stuff!! --Bcp67 (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I try to keep up to it when I can find the time! Peaky76 (talk) 22:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ballabriggs, Imperial Commander

Good work on both articles. They certainly aren't stubs anymore. equineline is a good, reliable source for pedigrees. Tigerboy1966 22:43, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source

This [1] is a good source of news stories on British Racing, especially in the late 19th and early 20th century. The NZ papers tended to reprint stories from the British ones, but as the British ones aren't generally available free on-line, this works very well. Tigerboy1966 19:47, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's excellent thanks very much. I will take a look. I likewise found some info on Loates in the New York Times that I couldn't find reported here. Peaky76 (talk) 22:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Freddie Fox

I have added a bit more info and references to the Freddie Fox (jockey) article, I dont have any interest in horse racing but just like to improve articles when I see I can improve them. Fox is birth place is from the 1911 Census which agrees with the General Register Office Birth Index which gives the registration district that includes Berrington. Keep up the good work. MilborneOne (talk) 11:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Annoying request

Those redlinked jockeys keep turning blue. Frank Wootton was years overdue for an article and a true "forgotten great": I honestly thought that he was born in South Africa till I read your article. Anyway, one of the things that happen when you get established as an authority on a subject is that people pester you with annoying requests for new articles, so here goes: Joe Childs please. Tigerboy1966 20:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not annoying at all! I'll get on to it pronto. Actually knew very little about any of these guys before I started looking into it. They were just names on a list to me. But it's amazing what you can find out once you have a rummage around. Found loads of old racing books that had just been gathering dust in the cellar. And those Australian and NZ news sites are a goldmine. Peaky76 (talk) 11:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I thought I was the only person on WP to have a copy of Mortimer's "Biographical Encyclopedia..."! Tigerboy1966 22:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lath

Hi, like Tigerboy I noticed you have been making good progress through the jockeys. I removed the odds column on the summary of Lath's known races, seeing as we don't know the odds for any of his races. Also, only a minor point, and I'm not sure which is more reliable, but Pick and Johnson's Turf Register (1801) says his match against Squirt was worth 300 gs and the race at Malborough £50 rather than 50 gs. ps good work on the 1780 Derby, Edwarddutton (talk) 21:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Edward. Yes, that's a good point on the odds column - makes sense to remove it. As for your other point, I keep finding these conflicts between sources! One of the hazards of dealing with something so far back I guess. Your source is earlier though, so I'd be happy to go with that. Peaky76 (talk) 22:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Childs

What a great article - you get a real sense of his career and personality - found it fascinating. I see you've got the Howard Wright "Encyclopedia of Flat Racing", still a much-thumbed book on my shelves over 25 years after it was published! --Bcp67 (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books about racecourses

A couple of books worth getting hold of are a pair I have written by John Tyrrell in the late 80s or early 90s - Racecourses On The Flat, and Chasing Around Britain. Good on the history of racecourses in Britain. --Bcp67 (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bcp, I will take a look Peaky76 (talk) 12:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horse racing in Scotland

Thanks for adding images to this article!--MacRùsgail (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Peaky76 (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

British Newspaper Archive (BNA)

Peaky76, I am able to approve your access to BNA. Please either e-mail me or enable your e-mail so I can pass you details on what happens next. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BNA access issue

Peaky76, I contacted you almost a month ago approving your access to BNA. I have to be able to e-mail you further instructions and you'll have to complete some registration tasks. If this isn't completed by January 15, I'll archive your application with no further action. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peaky76. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Swinburns

Thank you for your message, very kind of you. The two Swinburns are easily confused for having the same first name. Wally was based in Ireland and Walter in England, but their careers did overlap slightly and both won Classics in 1981, Wally at the end of his career and Walter at the start of his! All the best and hope to see you doing plenty of editing in 2015. --Bcp67 (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Brown

I notice that in the List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom you deleted my reference to Neville Chamberlain as last British PM to hold the office without involvement of a General Election, explaining it was no longer the case as Gordon Brown had superseded. Gordon Brown, although he took office mid-term to succeed Blair, did contest (and lose) the 2010 General Election so it cannot be said his term was untested.Cloptonson (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. My misunderstanding. Peaky76 (talk) 13:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mercurius Scoticus

Hello, Peaky76, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Peaky76/Mercurius Scoticus. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Please also consider moving the article to draftspace so it can be prepared as an AFC submission. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British Champion flat jockeys

Based on this [2] do you think it's safe to update the 1864 champion to James "Jemmy" Grimshaw rather than just J.Grimshaw? Also see [3] Topcardi (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very belatedly, yes I think we can! I've updated it now. Thanks Peaky76 (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bedale horse racing

Hi; thanks for the edit but could you please insert the page number from the book in the citation? Ta. regards. The joy of all things (talk) 10:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Brand

Apologies for that, clicked rollback in error! Mjroots (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mjroots No worries! Peaky76 (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.scottishreformationsociety.org/the-magdalen-chapel/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Magdalen Chapel, Edinburgh saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Edinburgh Comedy Awards has been nominated for merging

Category:Edinburgh Comedy Awards has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editor requests your review of comedian's notability

Hello User:Peaky76. My name is Dan Cook. I do paid editing on behalf of clients, mostly article cleanup, always using the Simple COI request template. My partner and I avoid new articles for any number of reasons. But I recently got a request for help with a new article from a British entertainer, Sheridan “Shed” Simove. He had a Wikipedia entry that was posted in 2011 but was deleted this past June. I am reaching out to you because your interest in Edinburgh Fringe may have brought you into the orbit of Shed World.

The story behind the deletion is convoluted, as you can imagine. But after talking to him, I think what happened was he went in to the article to add in new information without disclosing his COI. (I’m pretty sure he did not understand the rules around such editing.) Another editor saw his work, decided he was not notable, and deleted it.

I reviewed his coverage and I do believe his is sufficiently notable to merit a rather short article. Would you be willing to review my draft?

I have written and formatted it, along with an assessment of the media coverage as per Wikipedia media credibility and the 65% guidelines. He’s got a fair amount of high level coverage (BBC, Reuters, Guardian, ABC News).

If so, please let me know whether you want me to put it in draft space, post it on your talk page, my talk page, my sandbox, etc. He would really appreciate knowing whether or not you think he can be restored to Wikipedia. I can share his previous article if you like. Thanking you in advance for any feedback you have to offer Shed. DanDavidCook (talk) 22:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan. Yes, of course. Happy to take a look at this. Add it wherever is easiest for you. Have to say he's not someone I've come across in Fringe circles, so can't vouch for his notability but willing to give the article a look over. Peaky76 (talk) 10:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be so late in acknowledging your offer to help. I will post it in my sandbox and invite you to review it. DanDavidCook (talk) 17:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks again for your offer to review the draft. It is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DanDavidCook/sandbox DanDavidCook (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sheridan Shed Simove draft

Hi there, here's the link to the finished draft. Let me know if you think he meets the notability standard based on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DanDavidCook/sandbox

Thanks in advance for your consideration. DanDavidCook (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"CAT:FRINGE" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CAT:FRINGE. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 17#CAT:FRINGE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weirsky

I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 00:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Edinburgh Festival Fringe media has been nominated for deletion

Category:Edinburgh Festival Fringe media has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Edinburgh Festival Fringe venues has been nominated for listification

Category:Edinburgh Festival Fringe venues has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01

CS1 error on British flat racing Champion Jockey

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page British flat racing Champion Jockey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:39, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on British flat racing Champion Apprentice

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page British flat racing Champion Apprentice, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jockeys

Great to see you getting so many good jockey articles from various eras up and running - brings back some good memories, Tony Murray rode Al Bahathri, who was a great favourite of mine. I usually pick up new articles from links to pages I'm watching, I try to get links done when I have time and have a quick look through the article for any typos or small fixes. All the best! Bcp67 (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes, I've found a bit of time again and unpacked my old racing books after a house move. Been enjoying getting back into it. And thanks for all you do. Any fixes much appreciated! Peaky76 (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"CAT:FRINGE" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect CAT:FRINGE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19 § CAT:FRINGE until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 65 Cowgate

The article 65 Cowgate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the page doesn't offer anyhitng of note and much of the information is already mentioned in Free Fringe

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist.

Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure ~~nearly~~ everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor to be a Guild coordinator (with their permission, of course) until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June.

Drive: In our September Backlog Elimination Drive, 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: The October Copy Editing Blitz saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: In our November Backlog Elimination Drive, 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted here.

Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.

To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle_gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]