Jump to content

Wage ratio: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m See also: added a link to Distribution of wealth
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Economic Concept}}[[File:Ratio for Each Income Percentile to Median Income In the U.S. Since 1970.png|upright=1.6|right|thumb|Ratio for Each Income Percentile to Median Income In the U.S. Since 1970. The plot shows the increase in the relative gains of those above the median versus those below the median with the largest gains for those in the highest percentile.]]
[[File:CEO pay v. average slub.png|upright=1.6|right|thumb|Ratio of the average compensation of CEOs from the top 350 firms and production workers, 1965–2009. Source: Economic Policy Institute. 2012. Based on data from Wall Street Journal/Mercer, Hay Group 2010.<ref name=EPI>{{cite web | title=Methodology for measuring CEO compensation and the ratio of CEO-to-worker compensation | website=Economic Policy Institute | date=May 2, 2012 | url=https://www.epi.org/publication/wp293-ceo-to-worker-pay-methodology/}}</ref><ref name="stateofworkingamerica.org 2011 a601">{{cite web | title=More compensation heading to the very top | website=stateofworkingamerica.org | date=February 15, 2011 | url=http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/charts/view/17 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111124040839/http://www.stateofworkingamerica.org/charts/view/17 | archive-date=November 24, 2011 | url-status=dead}}</ref>]]

In [[economics]], the '''wage ratio''' refers to the [[ratio]] of the top salaries in a group (company, city, country, etc.) to the bottom salaries. It is a measure of [[wage dispersion]].
In [[economics]], the '''wage ratio''' refers to the [[ratio]] of the top salaries in a group (company, city, country, etc.) to the bottom salaries. It is a measure of [[wage dispersion]].


There has been a resurgence for the importance of equitable wage ratio. The amount of money paid out to executives has steadily been on the rise. "An April 2013 study by Bloomberg finds that large public company CEOs were paid an average of 204 times the compensation of rank-and-file workers in their industries. By comparison, it is estimated that the average CEO was paid about 20 times the typical worker’s pay in the 1950s, with that multiple rising to 42-to-1 in 1980, and to 120-to-1 in 2000".<ref>{{cite web|last=Aguilar|first=Louis A.|title=SEC Open Meeting|url=https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539813937#.UqFAohbFnwy|website=Sec.gov|accessdate=6 December 2013}}</ref> While not as extreme, similar trends have been observed around the world.
There has been a resurgence in the importance of the wage ratio as well as the [[CEO Pay Ratio]]. The amount of money paid out to executives has steadily been on the rise. In the US "an April 2013 study by Bloomberg finds that large public company CEOs were paid an average of 204 times the compensation of rank-and-file workers in their industries. By comparison, it is estimated that the average [[CEO Pay Ratio]] was about 20 times the typical worker’s pay in the 1950s, with that multiple rising to 42-to-1 in 1980, and to 120-to-1 in 2000".<ref>{{cite web|last=Aguilar|first=Louis A.|title=SEC Open Meeting|url=https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539813937#.UqFAohbFnwy|website=Sec.gov|accessdate=6 December 2013}}</ref> While not as extreme, similar trends have been observed around the world.

Research suggests that consumers believe [[CEO Pay Ratio]]s are far lower than they actually are; in fact, consumers’ ideal ratio of CEO pay to average unskilled worker is 4.6 to 1, while their estimated actual ratio of CEO pay to average unskilled worker pay is 10 to 1.<ref name="Mohan Norton Deshpande 2015 p. ">{{cite journal | last1=Mohan | first1=Bhavya | last2=Norton | first2=Michael I. | last3=Deshpande | first3=Rohit | title=Paying Up for Fair Pay: Consumers Prefer Firms with Lower CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios | journal=SSRN Electronic Journal | publisher=Elsevier BV | year=2015 | issn=1556-5068 | doi=10.2139/ssrn.2611289 | page=| s2cid=167620304 | url=https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/1/16080249/1/15-091.pdf }}</ref>

==In Antiquity==

The [[Solonian constitution]] of 6th-century-BCE [[History of Athens|Athens]] divided citizens into four social classes. The highest, the ''pentacosiomedimni'', produced (or earned the equivalent of) 500 [[medimnos|medimnoi]] of wet or dry goods per year. Second were the ''[[hippeis]]'', who made at least 300 medimnoi, followed by the ''zeugitae'', who made at least 200. The lowest class, the ''thetes'', made less than 200 medimnoi per year.<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg007.perseus-eng1:18|title=Plutarch's Lives: Solon|author=Plutarch|date=1914|via=Perseus Digital Library, Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press |translator=Bernadotte Perrin|access-date=2019-05-06|chapter=18: section 1|location=London|publisher=William Heinemann Ltd|author-mask=0}}</ref> This meant that a member of the highest class might have an income only 2.5 times the income of a member of the lowest class.


==Regulation, Reporting and Initiatives==
==Regulation, Reporting and Initiatives==
With wage ratios steadily climbing, there has been a push to have increased transparency in publicizing the ratio for many of the world's largest companies. There have also been a number of movements around to the world to attempt to regulate the pay ratio between executives and workers, or to regulate executive pay from the workers' end. Notably, an excessive wage ratio may not be in the best interest of company as it harms customer satisfaction and does not benefit long-term firm performance.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bamberger |first1=Boas |last2=Homburg |first2=Christian |last3=Wielgos |first3=Dominik M. |title=Wage Inequality: Its Impact on Customer Satisfaction and Firm Performance |journal=Journal of Marketing |date=2021 |doi=10.1177/00222429211026655 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222429211026655 |accessdate=31 July 2021|doi-access=free }}</ref> Nevertheless, as high wage ratios boost short-term firm profitability<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Connelly |first1=Brian L. |last2=Takacs Haynes |first2=Katalin |last3=Tihanyi |first3=Laszlo |last4=Gamache |first4=Daniel L. |last5=Devers |first5= Cynthia E. |title=Minding the Gap: Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management-To-Worker Pay Dispersion |journal=Journal of Management |date=2016 |doi=10.1177/0149206313503015 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206313503015 |accessdate=31 July 2021 }}</ref>, there may be a need for regulation.
With wage ratios steadily climbing, there has been a push to have increased transparency in publicizing the ratio for many of the world's largest companies. There have also been a number of attempts around to the world to limit the pay ratio between executives and workers. In support of a limit on pay ratios, it has been claimed that an excessive wage ratio may not be in the best interest of company as it harms customer satisfaction and does not benefit long-term firm performance.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bamberger |first1=Boas |last2=Homburg |first2=Christian |last3=Wielgos |first3=Dominik M. |title=Wage Inequality: Its Impact on Customer Satisfaction and Firm Performance |journal=Journal of Marketing |date=2021 |volume=85 |issue=6 |pages=24–43 |doi=10.1177/00222429211026655 |doi-access=free |url=https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/61379/1/00222429211026655.pdf }}</ref> Nevertheless, as high wage ratios boost short-term firm profitability,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Connelly |first1=Brian L. |last2=Takacs Haynes |first2=Katalin |last3=Tihanyi |first3=Laszlo |last4=Gamache |first4=Daniel L. |last5=Devers |first5= Cynthia E. |title=Minding the Gap: Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management-To-Worker Pay Dispersion |journal=Journal of Management |date=2016 |volume=42 |issue=4 |pages=862–885 |doi=10.1177/0149206313503015 |s2cid=145235395 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206313503015 |accessdate=31 July 2021 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> the need for a limit on pay ratios may be overstated.


'''Canada''': [[Wagemark|The Wagemark Foundation]], a Toronto-based not-for-profit organization is working to create an international wage standard certifying organizations that can prove they operate with a wage ratio of 8:1 or lower.
'''Canada''': [[Wagemark|The Wagemark Foundation]], a Toronto-based not-for-profit organization is working to create an international wage standard certifying organizations that can prove they operate with a maximum wage ratio of 8:1.


'''Germany''': Companies in Germany with over 2000 employees are required to have a [[supervisory board]], half of which are required to be workers of said company, under the [[Mitbestimmungsgesetz]], enforcing [[Codetermination in Germany|codetermination]]. The supervisory board sets the executive wages of the company.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://dejure.org/gesetze/AktG/87.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2017-05-06 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107021655/https://dejure.org/gesetze/AktG/87.html |archivedate=2017-11-07 }} </ref>
'''Germany''': Companies in Germany with over 2000 employees are required to have a [[supervisory board]], half of which are required to be workers of said company, under the [[Mitbestimmungsgesetz]], enforcing [[Codetermination in Germany|codetermination]]. The supervisory board sets the executive wages of the company.<ref>{{cite web | title=§ 87 AktG Grundsätze für die Bezüge der Vorstandsmitglieder | website=dejure.org | date=October 10, 2008 | url=https://dejure.org/gesetze/AktG/87.html | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171107021655/https://dejure.org/gesetze/AktG/87.html | archive-date=November 7, 2017 | url-status=unfit | language=de}}</ref>


'''Spain''': In 2013, the Spanish [[Spanish Socialist Workers' Party|Socialist Workers Party]], the official Spanish opposition party, adopted a ratio as part of their official policy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/switzerland-to-vote-on-executive-pay-law-sunday-2013-11|title=Switzerland's Proposed New Law To Link Executives' Pay With Their Lowest Paid Workers Could Lead To A Banking Exodus|website=Businessinsider.com|accessdate=5 November 2017}}</ref> The [[Mondragon Corporation]], a worker-owned cooperative headquartered in the [[Basque Country (autonomous community)|Basque Country]], has an internal wage ratio at an average of 5:1, periodically decided with a democratic vote.<ref name='Herrera'>{{cite journal |last1=Herrera |first1=David |year=2004 |title=Mondragon: a for-profit organization that embodies Catholic social thought. |journal=Review of Business |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=56–68 |publisher=The Peter J. Tobin College of Business, St. John's University|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100714041351/http://www.community-wealth.org/_pdfs/articles-publications/outside-us/article-herrera.pdf|archivedate=2010-07-14|url=http://community-wealth.org/_pdfs/articles-publications/outside-us/article-herrera.pdf |accessdate=August 29, 2014}}</ref>
'''Spain''': In 2013, the Spanish [[Spanish Socialist Workers' Party|Socialist Workers Party]], the official Spanish opposition party, adopted a ratio as part of their official policy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessinsider.com/switzerland-to-vote-on-executive-pay-law-sunday-2013-11|title=Switzerland's Proposed New Law To Link Executives' Pay With Their Lowest Paid Workers Could Lead To A Banking Exodus|website=Businessinsider.com|accessdate=5 November 2017}}</ref> The [[Mondragon Corporation]], a worker-owned cooperative headquartered in the [[Basque Country (autonomous community)|Basque Country]], has an internal wage ratio at an average of 5:1, periodically decided with a democratic vote.<ref name='Herrera'>{{cite journal |last1=Herrera |first1=David |year=2004 |title=Mondragon: a for-profit organization that embodies Catholic social thought. |journal=Review of Business |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=56–68 |publisher=The Peter J. Tobin College of Business, St. John's University|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100714041351/http://www.community-wealth.org/_pdfs/articles-publications/outside-us/article-herrera.pdf|archivedate=2010-07-14|url=http://community-wealth.org/_pdfs/articles-publications/outside-us/article-herrera.pdf |accessdate=August 29, 2014}}</ref>


'''Switzerland''': {{ill|Popular Initiative "1:12 Initiative - For fair wages"|de|Eidgenössische Volksinitiative «1:12 – Für gerechte Löhne»|fr|Initiative populaire « 1:12 - Pour des salaires équitables »}} was a Swiss referendum held on November 24, 2013 in an attempt to create legislation limiting the amount of executive pay to a maximum of 12 times that of the lowest paid workers. The referendum was rejected by 65.3%, with a turnout of 53%, and no canton took on the initiative. The largest rejection came from the [[canton of Zug]], accepted by only 23% of the votes, and the least rejection came from [[Ticino]], where it was supported by 49%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/abstimmungen/abstimmungen/1-12-initiative/65-3-prozent-sagen-nein-zur-1-12-initiative|title=65,3 Prozent sagen Nein zur 1:12-Initiative|work=[[Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen|SRF]] Online|access-date=24 November 2013|trans-title=65.3 Percent Say No to 1:12 Initiative}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.admin.ch/ch/d/pore/vi/vis375.html|title=Eidgenössische Volksinitiative '1:12 - Für gerechte Löhne'|trans-title=Federal Popular Initiative "1:12 - For fair wages"|publisher=[[Government of Switzerland]]|access-date=2017-02-12}}</ref>
'''Switzerland''': {{ill|Popular Initiative "1:12 Initiative - For fair wages"|de|Eidgenössische Volksinitiative «1:12 – Für gerechte Löhne»|fr|Initiative populaire « 1:12 - Pour des salaires équitables »}} was a Swiss referendum held on November 24, 2013, in an attempt to create legislation limiting the amount of executive pay to a maximum of 12 times that of the lowest paid workers. The referendum was rejected by 65.3%, with a turnout of 53%, and no canton took on the initiative. The largest rejection came from the [[canton of Zug]], accepted by only 23% of the votes, and the least rejection came from [[Ticino]], where it was supported by 49%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/abstimmungen/abstimmungen/1-12-initiative/65-3-prozent-sagen-nein-zur-1-12-initiative|title=65,3 Prozent sagen Nein zur 1:12-Initiative|work=[[Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen|SRF]] Online|date=22 November 2013 |access-date=24 November 2013|trans-title=65.3 Percent Say No to 1:12 Initiative}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.admin.ch/ch/d/pore/vi/vis375.html|title=Eidgenössische Volksinitiative '1:12 - Für gerechte Löhne'|trans-title=Federal Popular Initiative "1:12 - For fair wages"|publisher=[[Government of Switzerland]]|access-date=2017-02-12}}</ref>


'''United Kingdom''': In 2017, the [[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Leader of the Opposition]] [[Jeremy Corbyn]] called for an enforced wage ratio for any company awarded a [[Government procurement|government contract]], of 20:1 between the executives and the lowest-paid employee. A similar call was previously made by [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[David Cameron]] in 2010 for the public sector.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/10/corbyn-proposes-maximum-wage-for-all-government-contractors|title=Corbyn calls for wage cap on bosses at government contractors|author=Rowena Mason|date=10 January 2017|website=Theguardian.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wagemark.org/about/history/|title=History - Wagemark|website=Wagemark.org}}</ref>
'''United Kingdom''': In 2017, the [[Leader of the Opposition (United Kingdom)|Leader of the Opposition]] [[Jeremy Corbyn]] called for an enforced maximum wage ratio of 20:1 between the highest-paid executive and the lowest-paid employee for any company awarded a [[Government procurement|government contract]]. A similar call had previously been made by [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] [[David Cameron]] in 2010 for the public sector.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/10/corbyn-proposes-maximum-wage-for-all-government-contractors|title=Corbyn calls for wage cap on bosses at government contractors|author=Rowena Mason|date=10 January 2017|website=Theguardian.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wagemark.org/about/history/|title=History - Wagemark|website=Wagemark.org}}</ref>


'''United States''': In 2010 President [[Barack Obama]] signed into effect the [[Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act]]. In short, Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act changed the regulation regarding CEO compensation disclosure to shareholders.<ref>[https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539813937#.UqD9NxbFnww] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215205546/http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539813937/ |date=2017-02-15 }}</ref> In December 2016, the city of [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]], [[Oregon]] voted to implement a surcharge for chief executives who earn more than 100 times the median pay of their workers in 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/07/business/economy/portland-oregon-tax-executive-pay.html|title=Portland Adopts Surcharge on C.E.O. Pay in Move vs. Income Inequality|first=Gretchen|last=Morgenson|date=7 December 2016|website=Nytimes.com}}</ref>
'''United States''': In 2010 President [[Barack Obama]] signed into effect the [[Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act]]. In short, Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act was changed to require disclosure of CEOs' compensation to shareholders.<ref>{{cite web | title=Providing Context for Executive Compensation Decisions | website=SEC.gov | date=September 18, 2013 | url=https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539813937 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927174522/https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370539813937 | archive-date=September 27, 2013 | url-status=dead}}</ref> In December 2016, the city of [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]], [[Oregon]] voted to implement a surcharge for chief executives who earn more than 100 times the median pay of their workers, to come into effect in 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/07/business/economy/portland-oregon-tax-executive-pay.html|title=Portland Adopts Surcharge on C.E.O. Pay in Move vs. Income Inequality|first=Gretchen|last=Morgenson|date=7 December 2016|website=[[The New York Times]]}}</ref>


==Pay ratio==
==Pay ratio==
'''United States''': The [[Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act]] requires publicly traded companies to report of a "pay ratio" which is the ratio between the [[CEO]] and the median employee, which began in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-160.html|title=SEC.gov {{!}} SEC Adopts Rule for Pay Ratio Disclosure|website=www.sec.gov|access-date=2019-05-28}}</ref> For example, McDonald's has a pay ratio of 3,101:1.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2018/07/12/how-many-workers-must-live-in-poverty-for-mcdonalds-ceo-to-make-21-8-million/|title=How Many Workers Must Live In Poverty For McDonald's CEO To Make $21.8 Million?|last=Sherman|first=Erik|website=Forbes|language=en|access-date=2019-05-28}}</ref>
'''United States''': The [[Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act]], which began in 2018, requires publicly traded companies to report a "pay ratio", which is the ratio of the [[CEO]]'s to the median employee's pay.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2015-160.html|title=SEC Adopts Rule for Pay Ratio Disclosure|website=www.sec.gov|access-date=2019-05-28}}</ref> For example, in 2018 McDonald's CEO's ratio was 3,101:1 (although the median pay was of a worker in Poland), while in Sweden the general ratio was 40:1.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2018/07/12/how-many-workers-must-live-in-poverty-for-mcdonalds-ceo-to-make-21-8-million/|title=How Many Workers Must Live In Poverty For McDonald's CEO To Make $10.8 per day |last=Sherman|first=Erik|website=Forbes|language=en|access-date=2019-05-28}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 25: Line 34:
* [[Family wage]]
* [[Family wage]]
* [[Basic income]]
* [[Basic income]]
* [[Wage dispersion]]
* [[Distribution of wealth]]

* [[CEO Pay Ratio]]
{{Portal|Economics
{{Portal|Economics
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:49, 8 December 2024

Ratio for Each Income Percentile to Median Income In the U.S. Since 1970. The plot shows the increase in the relative gains of those above the median versus those below the median with the largest gains for those in the highest percentile.
Ratio of the average compensation of CEOs from the top 350 firms and production workers, 1965–2009. Source: Economic Policy Institute. 2012. Based on data from Wall Street Journal/Mercer, Hay Group 2010.[1][2]

In economics, the wage ratio refers to the ratio of the top salaries in a group (company, city, country, etc.) to the bottom salaries. It is a measure of wage dispersion.

There has been a resurgence in the importance of the wage ratio as well as the CEO Pay Ratio. The amount of money paid out to executives has steadily been on the rise. In the US "an April 2013 study by Bloomberg finds that large public company CEOs were paid an average of 204 times the compensation of rank-and-file workers in their industries. By comparison, it is estimated that the average CEO Pay Ratio was about 20 times the typical worker’s pay in the 1950s, with that multiple rising to 42-to-1 in 1980, and to 120-to-1 in 2000".[3] While not as extreme, similar trends have been observed around the world.

Research suggests that consumers believe CEO Pay Ratios are far lower than they actually are; in fact, consumers’ ideal ratio of CEO pay to average unskilled worker is 4.6 to 1, while their estimated actual ratio of CEO pay to average unskilled worker pay is 10 to 1.[4]

In Antiquity

[edit]

The Solonian constitution of 6th-century-BCE Athens divided citizens into four social classes. The highest, the pentacosiomedimni, produced (or earned the equivalent of) 500 medimnoi of wet or dry goods per year. Second were the hippeis, who made at least 300 medimnoi, followed by the zeugitae, who made at least 200. The lowest class, the thetes, made less than 200 medimnoi per year.[5] This meant that a member of the highest class might have an income only 2.5 times the income of a member of the lowest class.

Regulation, Reporting and Initiatives

[edit]

With wage ratios steadily climbing, there has been a push to have increased transparency in publicizing the ratio for many of the world's largest companies. There have also been a number of attempts around to the world to limit the pay ratio between executives and workers. In support of a limit on pay ratios, it has been claimed that an excessive wage ratio may not be in the best interest of company as it harms customer satisfaction and does not benefit long-term firm performance.[6] Nevertheless, as high wage ratios boost short-term firm profitability,[7] the need for a limit on pay ratios may be overstated.

Canada: The Wagemark Foundation, a Toronto-based not-for-profit organization is working to create an international wage standard certifying organizations that can prove they operate with a maximum wage ratio of 8:1.

Germany: Companies in Germany with over 2000 employees are required to have a supervisory board, half of which are required to be workers of said company, under the Mitbestimmungsgesetz, enforcing codetermination. The supervisory board sets the executive wages of the company.[8]

Spain: In 2013, the Spanish Socialist Workers Party, the official Spanish opposition party, adopted a ratio as part of their official policy.[9] The Mondragon Corporation, a worker-owned cooperative headquartered in the Basque Country, has an internal wage ratio at an average of 5:1, periodically decided with a democratic vote.[10]

Switzerland: Popular Initiative "1:12 Initiative - For fair wages" [de; fr] was a Swiss referendum held on November 24, 2013, in an attempt to create legislation limiting the amount of executive pay to a maximum of 12 times that of the lowest paid workers. The referendum was rejected by 65.3%, with a turnout of 53%, and no canton took on the initiative. The largest rejection came from the canton of Zug, accepted by only 23% of the votes, and the least rejection came from Ticino, where it was supported by 49%.[11][12]

United Kingdom: In 2017, the Leader of the Opposition Jeremy Corbyn called for an enforced maximum wage ratio of 20:1 between the highest-paid executive and the lowest-paid employee for any company awarded a government contract. A similar call had previously been made by Prime Minister David Cameron in 2010 for the public sector.[13][14]

United States: In 2010 President Barack Obama signed into effect the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In short, Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act was changed to require disclosure of CEOs' compensation to shareholders.[15] In December 2016, the city of Portland, Oregon voted to implement a surcharge for chief executives who earn more than 100 times the median pay of their workers, to come into effect in 2017.[16]

Pay ratio

[edit]

United States: The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which began in 2018, requires publicly traded companies to report a "pay ratio", which is the ratio of the CEO's to the median employee's pay.[17] For example, in 2018 McDonald's CEO's ratio was 3,101:1 (although the median pay was of a worker in Poland), while in Sweden the general ratio was 40:1.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Methodology for measuring CEO compensation and the ratio of CEO-to-worker compensation". Economic Policy Institute. May 2, 2012.
  2. ^ "More compensation heading to the very top". stateofworkingamerica.org. February 15, 2011. Archived from the original on November 24, 2011.
  3. ^ Aguilar, Louis A. "SEC Open Meeting". Sec.gov. Retrieved 6 December 2013.
  4. ^ Mohan, Bhavya; Norton, Michael I.; Deshpande, Rohit (2015). "Paying Up for Fair Pay: Consumers Prefer Firms with Lower CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios" (PDF). SSRN Electronic Journal. Elsevier BV. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2611289. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 167620304.
  5. ^ "18: section 1". Plutarch's Lives: Solon. Translated by Bernadotte Perrin. London: William Heinemann Ltd. 1914. Retrieved 2019-05-06 – via Perseus Digital Library, Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
  6. ^ Bamberger, Boas; Homburg, Christian; Wielgos, Dominik M. (2021). "Wage Inequality: Its Impact on Customer Satisfaction and Firm Performance" (PDF). Journal of Marketing. 85 (6): 24–43. doi:10.1177/00222429211026655.
  7. ^ Connelly, Brian L.; Takacs Haynes, Katalin; Tihanyi, Laszlo; Gamache, Daniel L.; Devers, Cynthia E. (2016). "Minding the Gap: Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management-To-Worker Pay Dispersion". Journal of Management. 42 (4): 862–885. doi:10.1177/0149206313503015. S2CID 145235395. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
  8. ^ "§ 87 AktG Grundsätze für die Bezüge der Vorstandsmitglieder". dejure.org (in German). October 10, 2008. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  9. ^ "Switzerland's Proposed New Law To Link Executives' Pay With Their Lowest Paid Workers Could Lead To A Banking Exodus". Businessinsider.com. Retrieved 5 November 2017.
  10. ^ Herrera, David (2004). "Mondragon: a for-profit organization that embodies Catholic social thought" (PDF). Review of Business. 25 (1). The Peter J. Tobin College of Business, St. John's University: 56–68. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-14. Retrieved August 29, 2014.
  11. ^ "65,3 Prozent sagen Nein zur 1:12-Initiative" [65.3 Percent Say No to 1:12 Initiative]. SRF Online. 22 November 2013. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
  12. ^ "Eidgenössische Volksinitiative '1:12 - Für gerechte Löhne'" [Federal Popular Initiative "1:12 - For fair wages"]. Government of Switzerland. Retrieved 2017-02-12.
  13. ^ Rowena Mason (10 January 2017). "Corbyn calls for wage cap on bosses at government contractors". Theguardian.com.
  14. ^ "History - Wagemark". Wagemark.org.
  15. ^ "Providing Context for Executive Compensation Decisions". SEC.gov. September 18, 2013. Archived from the original on September 27, 2013.
  16. ^ Morgenson, Gretchen (7 December 2016). "Portland Adopts Surcharge on C.E.O. Pay in Move vs. Income Inequality". The New York Times.
  17. ^ "SEC Adopts Rule for Pay Ratio Disclosure". www.sec.gov. Retrieved 2019-05-28.
  18. ^ Sherman, Erik. "How Many Workers Must Live In Poverty For McDonald's CEO To Make $10.8 per day". Forbes. Retrieved 2019-05-28.