Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. (Fix Category:WikiProject banners with redundant class parameter) Tag: |
|||
| (477 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader|wp=yes}} |
|||
Just with the to-do list: is Adelaide going to follow the naming conventions established in Sydney and Melbourne? If that's going to be the case, then the suburbs should be at Suburb, South Australia, and railway stations at Station railway station, Adelaide. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 02:22, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Australia|Adelaide=yes|importance=NA}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
| algo = old(90d) |
|||
| archive = Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| counter = 3 |
|||
| maxarchivesize = 100K |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{archives}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Invite}} |
|||
{{anchor|63305152546}} |
|||
== The Advertiser ? == |
|||
:Yeah, I guess we are. Adelaide's public transport system is unique however and we have lots of "bus interchanges" (on the [[Adelaide O-Bahn]]) which work similarly to railway stations in other places. - [[User:Aaronhill|Aaron Hill]] 02:47, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
::Would they be worth creating articles on? [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 02:22, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC) |
|||
:::I think of them as relatively large railway stations, so yeah they probably are worth creating articles on especially considering their unique qualities. I live really close to the O-Bahn so I might take a walk down a get a few photos. Subpage:[[WikiProject Adelaide/Interchanges]] - [[User:Aaronhill|Aaron Hill]] 02:27, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
::::I catch the O-Bahn from Paradise Interchange just about every day, but I don't have a camera. As for the stations thingy, there's Belair, Noarlunga, Gawler, Tonsley... '''Suburb, South Australia''' should be fine. If not, we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. [[User:Alphax|Alphax]] [[User_talk:Alphax|(talk)]] 15:00, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Could someone with access sort out the bare URL ref https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=AAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adelaidenow.com.au%2Fdelicious-sa%2Fgreat-taste-zero-waste-at-the-ports-newest-cafe%2Fnews-story%2F56d8179ad393f2abe14e21e7ce13ab98&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium which appears in [[Port Adelaide]]? It was [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Port_Adelaide&diff=next&oldid=964766239 added by an IP]. Or perhaps the whole sentence should just be removed? [[User:PamD|<span style="color: green">'''''Pam'''''</span>]][[User talk:PamD|<span style="color: brown">'''''D'''''</span>]] 13:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, I hope you don't mind, but I kind of re-organised the project page - I'm a relatively new user/member, so forgive me for being a ignorant of Wikipedia etiquette. I'd like to help out with the Adelaide project. I've already contributed to some articles on Adelaide and Australia. - [[User:Cyberjunkie|Cyberjunkie]] 20:00, Nov 20, 2004. |
|||
== Project-independent quality assessments == |
|||
I'd like to see the history of Adelaide expanded on the [[Adelaide]] Page, could this be added to the wikiproject? - [[User:Diceman|Diceman]] 15:40, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]], but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent [[WP:Village pump (proposals)/Archive_198#Project-independent_quality_assessments|Village pump proposal]] was approved and has been implemented to add a {{para|class}} parameter to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. |
|||
== New participant == |
|||
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{tl|WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. |
|||
Hi, |
|||
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{tl|WPBannerMeta}} a new {{para|QUALITY_CRITERIA|custom}} parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 13:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
I've added my name to the participants list. What does this mean/change? Do we have a leader or pecking order? Is there a formal coordinating action (like a project of the week), or do we still just add whatever interests us as and when we can? Does this project cover strictly just the metro area, or loosely the whole state? |
|||
--[[User:ScottDavis|ScottDavis]] 08:11, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:Is it possible to speak to some-one in Adelaide about editing Wikipedia ? |
|||
:We don't have a leader or a pecking order - we're just a bunch of interested people trying to improve coverage of the city. [[User:Aaronhill]] is probably the best person to talk to, though. We just cover what interests us, though it might be a good idea to highlight particular places/people that need articles here. I don't think anyone's likely to object if it loosely covers the whole state, too. [[User:Ambi|Ambi]] 10:17, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:regards margesson [[User:Margesson|Margesson]] ([[User talk:Margesson|talk]]) 11:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Requested move at [[Talk:Memorial Drive Park#Requested move 31 August 2024]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] There is a requested move discussion at [[Talk:Memorial Drive Park#Requested move 31 August 2024]] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. [[User talk:Reading Beans|<span style="color:#333">'''Reading Beans'''</span>]] 16:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:23, 9 December 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Adelaide and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
|
Adelaide Meetup Next: 15 November 2024 Last: 6 March 2020 |
The Advertiser ?
[edit]Could someone with access sort out the bare URL ref https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=AAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adelaidenow.com.au%2Fdelicious-sa%2Fgreat-taste-zero-waste-at-the-ports-newest-cafe%2Fnews-story%2F56d8179ad393f2abe14e21e7ce13ab98&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium which appears in Port Adelaide? It was added by an IP. Or perhaps the whole sentence should just be removed? PamD 13:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
[edit]Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is it possible to speak to some-one in Adelaide about editing Wikipedia ?
- regards margesson Margesson (talk) 11:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Memorial Drive Park#Requested move 31 August 2024
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Memorial Drive Park#Requested move 31 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans 16:45, 8 September 2024 (UTC)