Jump to content

Outline of South Asian history: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Afghanistan removed, is central Asia not South Asia
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
good enough
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
to this outline are on the way
to this outline are on the way
...-->
...-->
The following [[outline (list)|outline]] is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the [[history of South Asia]]:


The following [[outline (list)|outline]] is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the [[South Asia#History|history of South Asia]].
'''History of South Asia''' – [[South Asia]] refers to the broader region in and around the historical [[Indian subcontinent]], which includes the contemporary geopolitical entities of [[History of the Republic of India|India]], [[History of Pakistan|Pakistan]], [[History of Bangladesh|Bangladesh]], [[History of Nepal|Nepal]], [[History of Bhutan|Bhutan]], and the island nations of [[History of Sri Lanka|Sri Lanka]] and the [[History of the Maldives|Maldives]].

The broader region in and around the historical [[Indian subcontinent]], which includes the contemporary geopolitical entities of [[History of Afghanistan|Afghanistan]], [[History of Bangladesh|Bangladesh]], [[History of Bhutan|Bhutan]], [[History of the Republic of India|India]], [[History of Nepal|Nepal]], [[History of Pakistan|Pakistan]], and the island countries of [[History of Maldives|Maldives]] and [[History of Sri Lanka|Sri Lanka]].


{{HistoryOfSouthAsia}}
{{HistoryOfSouthAsia}}
Line 98: Line 99:
|}
|}
|}
|}
[[James Mill]] (1773–1836), in his [[The History of British India]] (1817), distinguished three phases in the history of India, namely Hindu, Muslim and British civilisations. This periodisation has been influential, but has also been criticised for the misconceptions it gave rise to. Another influential periodisation is the division into "ancient, classical, medieval and modern periods", although this periodisation has also been criticised.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19–20}}
[[James Mill]] (1773–1836), in his [[The History of British India]] (1817), distinguished three phases in the history of India, namely Hindu, Muslim, and British civilisations. This periodisation has been influential, but has also been criticised for the misconceptions it gave rise to. Another influential periodisation is the division into "ancient, classical, medieval and modern periods", although this periodisation has also been criticised.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19–20}}


Romila Thapar notes that the division into Hindu-Muslim-British periods of Indian history gives too much weight to "ruling dynasties and foreign invasions",{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} neglecting the social-economic history which often showed a strong continuity.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} The division into Ancient-Medieval-Modern periods overlooks the fact that the Muslim conquests occurred gradually during which time many things came and went off, while the south was never completely conquered.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} According to Thapar, a periodisation could also be based on "significant social and economic changes", which are not strictly related to the change of ruling powers.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=20}}{{refn|group=note|See also Tanvir Anjum, ''[https://www.academia.edu/6647852/Temporal_Divides_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Major_Schemes_of_Periodization_in_Indian_History Temporal Divides: A Critical Review of the Major Schemes of Periodization in Indian History]''.}}
Romila Thapar notes that the division into Hindu-Muslim-British periods of Indian history gives too much weight to "ruling dynasties and foreign invasions",{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} neglecting the social-economic history which often showed a strong continuity.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} The division into Ancient-Medieval-Modern periods overlooks the fact that the Muslim conquests occurred gradually during which time many things came and went off, while the south was never completely conquered.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=19}} According to Thapar, a periodisation could also be based on "significant social and economic changes", which are not strictly related to the change of ruling powers.{{sfn|Thapar|1978|p=20}}{{refn|group=note|See also Tanvir Anjum, ''[https://www.academia.edu/6647852/Temporal_Divides_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Major_Schemes_of_Periodization_in_Indian_History Temporal Divides: A Critical Review of the Major Schemes of Periodization in Indian History]''.}}


== By period ==
== By period ==

=== Paleolithic and Mesolithic age ===
=== Paleolithic and Mesolithic age ===
* [[Madrasian culture]] ( 1.5 MYA)
* [[Madrasian culture]] ( 1.5 MYA)
* [[Soanian|Soanian culture]]
* [[Soanian|Soanian culture]]
({{Circa|500,000}}–125,000 BCE)
({{Circa|500,000}}–125,000 BCE)
*[[South Asian Stone Age]] ({{Circa|50,000}}–5000 BCE)
* [[South Asian Stone Age]] ({{Circa|50,000}}–5000 BCE)


=== Neolithic age ===
=== Neolithic age ===
Line 269: Line 269:
* [[British Raj]]   (1858–1947 CE)
* [[British Raj]]   (1858–1947 CE)
* [[Partition of British India]]   (1947 CE)
* [[Partition of British India]]   (1947 CE)
* [[Portuguese Ceylon]]   (1505–1658 CE)
* [[Dutch Ceylon]]   (1656–1796 CE)
* [[British Ceylon]]   (1815–1948 CE)


=== Kingdoms of Sri Lanka ===
=== Kingdoms of Sri Lanka ===
Line 287: Line 290:
* [[Kingdom of Sitawaka]]   (1521–1594 CE)
* [[Kingdom of Sitawaka]]   (1521–1594 CE)
* [[Kingdom of Kandy]]   (1469–1815 CE)
* [[Kingdom of Kandy]]   (1469–1815 CE)
* [[Portuguese Ceylon]]   (1505–1658 CE)
* [[Dutch Ceylon]]   (1656–1796 CE)
* [[British Ceylon]]   (1815–1948 CE)


== History of South Asia, by region ==
== History of South Asia, by region ==

Latest revision as of 23:09, 9 December 2024

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the history of South Asia.

The broader region in and around the historical Indian subcontinent, which includes the contemporary geopolitical entities of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and the island countries of Maldives and Sri Lanka.

Chronology

[edit]
Chronology of India
James Mill (1774–1836), in his The History of British India (1817),[a] distinguished three phases in the history of the Indian subcontinent, namely Hindu, Muslim, and British civilisations.[b][c] This periodisation has been influential, but has also been criticised for the misconceptions it gave rise to.[d] Another influential periodisation is the division into "ancient, classical, medieval and modern periods".[e]
World History[f] James Mill's Periodisation[g] ACMM[h][i] Chronology of Indian History[j][k][l][m]
Early Societes
(3500–2500 BCE)
Early Indian Civilizations Ancient India Prehistoric Era
Indus Valley civilisation (c. 3300–1750 BCE)
Ancient Vedic Kingdoms
(2500–600 BCE)
Hindu civilisations Early Vedic period
(c. 1750 – 1200 BCE)
Middle Vedic period
(from 1200 BCE)
Late Vedic period
(from 850 BCE)
Classical Civilisations
(600 BCE-500 CE)
Second urbanisation
Early empires[n]
(c. 600–200 BCE)[o]
Disintegration[p] and regional states
(c. 200 BCE–300 CE)[q]
Classical India "Golden Age" (Gupta Empire)
(c. 320–650 CE)[r]
Post-classical age
(500–1000 CE)
Medieval India Regional Indian kingdoms and Beginning of Islamic raids
(c. 650–1100 CE)[s]
Transregional nomadic empires
(1000–1500 CE)
Muslim civilisations Delhi Sultanate (north India)
(1206–1526 CE)
Vijayanagara Empire (south India)
(1336–1646 CE)
Modern age
(1500–present)
Modern India Mughal Empire
(1526–1707)
British civilisations Maratha Empire
British rule
(c. 1750 CE–1947)
Independent India

James Mill (1773–1836), in his The History of British India (1817), distinguished three phases in the history of India, namely Hindu, Muslim, and British civilisations. This periodisation has been influential, but has also been criticised for the misconceptions it gave rise to. Another influential periodisation is the division into "ancient, classical, medieval and modern periods", although this periodisation has also been criticised.[1]

Romila Thapar notes that the division into Hindu-Muslim-British periods of Indian history gives too much weight to "ruling dynasties and foreign invasions",[2] neglecting the social-economic history which often showed a strong continuity.[2] The division into Ancient-Medieval-Modern periods overlooks the fact that the Muslim conquests occurred gradually during which time many things came and went off, while the south was never completely conquered.[2] According to Thapar, a periodisation could also be based on "significant social and economic changes", which are not strictly related to the change of ruling powers.[3][note 1]

By period

[edit]

Paleolithic and Mesolithic age

[edit]

(c. 500,000–125,000 BCE)

Neolithic age

[edit]

Bronze Age

[edit]

Bronze Age India (3500–1500 BCE)

Iron Age and Vedic period

[edit]

Middle kingdoms

[edit]

Late medieval period

[edit]

Late medieval period   (1206–1596)

Early modern period

[edit]

Early modern period   (1526–1858)

European colonial period

[edit]

Colonial period   (1510–1961 CE)

Kingdoms of Sri Lanka

[edit]

History of South Asia, by region

[edit]

By South Asian subregion

[edit]

By country and national subdivision

[edit]

History of South Asia, by subject

[edit]

History of architecture in South Asia

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Thapar 1978, p. 19–20.
  2. ^ a b c Thapar 1978, p. 19.
  3. ^ Thapar 1978, p. 20.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]