Talk:Dactinomycin: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m →top: Category:Articles with conflicting quality ratings: -Start, keep C |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
||
{{WikiProject Pharmacology|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}} |
|||
==Structure== |
|||
Structure lacks stereochemistry. I believe the structure is here: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.10482167.html --[[User:ChemSpiderMan|ChemSpiderMan]] ([[User talk:ChemSpiderMan|talk]]) 17:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC) |
Structure lacks stereochemistry. I believe the structure is here: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.10482167.html --[[User:ChemSpiderMan|ChemSpiderMan]] ([[User talk:ChemSpiderMan|talk]]) 17:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I have now added a structure with stereochemistry. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 18:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC) |
:I have now added a structure with stereochemistry. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 18:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
::Can we have a brief description of the structure ? eg is it two macrolide rings linked with ?? - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 02:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Rude advertisment?== |
==Rude advertisment?== |
||
We may allow a link to a page that adds or verifies information, but should we suffer such arrogant misuse of Wikipedia as the current BioAustralis add here? they give a link not to an useful monograph of theirs, but to their order form ! [[User:Lushi|Lushi]] ([[User talk:Lushi|talk]]) 22:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC) |
We may allow a link to a page that adds or verifies information, but should we suffer such arrogant misuse of Wikipedia as the current BioAustralis add here? they give a link not to an useful monograph of theirs, but to their order form ! [[User:Lushi|Lushi]] ([[User talk:Lushi|talk]]) 22:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== unused image == |
|||
[[Image:Actinomycin.png|thumb|300px|left|General structure of actinomycins]]--[[User:Jsjsjs1111|Jsjsjs1111]] ([[User talk:Jsjsjs1111|talk]]) 09:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 10 December 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Dactinomycin.
|
Structure
[edit]Structure lacks stereochemistry. I believe the structure is here: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.10482167.html --ChemSpiderMan (talk) 17:34, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I have now added a structure with stereochemistry. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:19, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Can we have a brief description of the structure ? eg is it two macrolide rings linked with ?? - Rod57 (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Rude advertisment?
[edit]We may allow a link to a page that adds or verifies information, but should we suffer such arrogant misuse of Wikipedia as the current BioAustralis add here? they give a link not to an useful monograph of theirs, but to their order form ! Lushi (talk) 22:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
unused image
[edit]