Jump to content

Pearl Harbor (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 45: Line 45:
}}
}}


'''''Pearl Harbor''''' is a 2001 American [[Romance film|romantic]] [[War film|war]] [[Drama (film and television)|drama film]] directed by [[Michael Bay]], produced by Bay and [[Jerry Bruckheimer]] and written by [[Randall Wallace]]. It stars [[Ben Affleck]], [[Kate Beckinsale]], [[Josh Hartnett]], [[Cuba Gooding Jr.]], [[Tom Sizemore]], [[Jon Voight]], [[Colm Feore]], and [[Alec Baldwin]]. The film features a heavily fictionalized version of the [[attack on Pearl Harbor]] by Japanese forces on December 7, 1941, focusing on a love story set amidst the lead up to the attack, its aftermath, and the [[Doolittle Raid]].
'''''Pearl Harbor''''' is a 2001 American [[Romance film|romantic]] [[War film|war]] [[Drama (film and television)|drama film]] directed by [[Michael Bay]], produced by Bay and [[Jerry Bruckheimer]] and written by [[Randall Wallace]]. Starring [[Ben Affleck]], [[Kate Beckinsale]], [[Josh Hartnett]], [[Cuba Gooding Jr.]], [[Tom Sizemore]], [[Jon Voight]], [[Colm Feore]], and [[Alec Baldwin]], the film features a heavily fictionalized version of the [[attack on Pearl Harbor]], focusing on a love story set amidst the lead up to the attack, its aftermath, and the [[Doolittle Raid]].


The film was a box office success, grossing $59 million in its opening weekend and $449.2 million worldwide, becoming [[2001 in film|the sixth-highest-grossing film of 2001]],<ref name="mojo" /> but received negative reviews from critics, who criticized the story, long runtime, screenplay and dialogue, pacing, performances and historical inaccuracies, although the visual effects and [[Hans Zimmer]]'s score were praised. It was nominated for four [[Academy Awards]], winning in the category of [[Academy Award for Best Sound Editing|Best Sound Editing]]. It was also nominated for six [[Golden Raspberry Awards]], including [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture|Worst Picture]].
The film was a box office success, grossing $59 million in its opening weekend and $449.2 million worldwide, becoming [[2001 in film|the sixth-highest-grossing film of 2001]],<ref name="mojo" /> but received negative reviews from critics, who criticized the story, long runtime, screenplay and dialogue, pacing, performances and historical inaccuracies. It was nominated for four [[Academy Awards]], winning in the category of [[Academy Award for Best Sound Editing|Best Sound Editing]]. It was also nominated for six [[Golden Raspberry Awards]], including [[Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture|Worst Picture]].


==Plot==
==Plot==
<!-- Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summary should be between 400 to 700 words. -->
<!-- Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summary should be between 400 to 700 words. -->
In 1923 [[Tennessee]], best friends Rafe McCawley and Danny Walker, play together in the back of Danny's father's old [[biplane]], pretending to be fighting airmen. Danny's father is a [[World War I|WWI]] Veteran suffering from [[Post-traumatic stress disorder|PTSD]], causing him to be abusive towards his son.
In 1923, in [[Tennessee]], two best friends, Rafe McCawley and Danny Walker, pretend to be fighting airmen. Rafe defends Danny from Danny's stern father, a [[World War One]] veteran suffering from [[PTSD]].


18 years later in January 1941, with [[World War II|WWII]] raging, Danny and Rafe are both first lieutenants under the command of Major [[Jimmy Doolittle]]. Doolittle informs Rafe that he has been accepted into the [[Eagle Squadron]] (an [[Royal Air Force|RAF]] outfit for American pilots during the [[Battle of Britain]]).
In January 1941, as [[World War II]] rages, Danny and Rafe are [[United States Army Air Corps|USAAC]] first lieutenants under the command of Major [[Jimmy Doolittle]]. Doolittle informs Rafe that he has been accepted into the [[Eagle Squadron]], an [[Royal Air Force|RAF]] outfit for American pilots in the [[Battle of Britain]]. Nurse Evelyn Johnson passes Rafe's medical exam despite his [[dyslexia]], and the two form a relationship. Rafe tells Evelyn he is leaving to join the Eagle Squadron. During a mission to intercept a [[Luftwaffe]] bombing raid, Rafe is shot down over the [[English Channel]] and is presumed killed in action. Danny and Evelyn mourn Rafe's death, which spurs a romance between the two. However, Rafe managed to survive and is found by French fishermen.


On the night of December 6, Evelyn is shocked when Rafe returns, having survived and escaped Nazi-occupied France. Rafe, in turn, discovers Danny's romance with Evelyn and leaves for the Hula bar, where Danny attempts to explain, but a fight ensues. When MPs arrive, they flee to avoid the brig. The next morning, December 7, the [[Imperial Japanese Navy]] [[attack on Pearl Harbor|attack Pearl Harbor]]. The [[US Pacific Fleet]] is severely damaged, and most of the defending airfields are obliterated. Rafe and Danny take off in [[P-40]] fighter planes and shoot down seven attacking planes. They later assist in rescuing the crew of the capsized {{USS|Oklahoma|BB-37|6}} but fail to save the crew of the obliterated {{USS|Arizona|BB-39|6}}.
Nurse Evelyn Johnson passes Rafe's medical exam despite his [[dyslexia]], and they start a relationship. Four weeks later, Rafe and Evelyn, now deeply in love, enjoy an evening of dancing at a nightclub and later a jaunt in the New York harbor in a borrowed police boat. Rafe shocks Evelyn by saying that he has joined the Eagle Squadron and is leaving the next day.


President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] requests that the US Congress [[Day of Infamy|declare war]] on the [[Empire of Japan]]. Danny and Rafe are assigned to Doolittle. Before they leave, Evelyn reveals to Rafe that she is pregnant with Danny's child; she intends to stay with and devote herself to Danny, but she vows that it is Rafe who she will always genuinely love. Danny and Rafe are promoted to captain and awarded the [[Silver Star]] for their actions at Pearl Harbor, and Doolittle asks them to volunteer for a secret mission. During the next three months, Rafe, Danny, and other pilots train for ultra-short takeoffs with specially modified [[North American B-25 Mitchell|B-25]]s. In April, the raiders on board the {{USS|Hornet|CV-8|6}} find their mission is to [[Doolittle raid|bomb Tokyo]], after which they will land in China. The mission is successful, and Rafe's and Danny's planes crash in China. While the raiders fight off Japanese soldiers, Danny is shot; when Rafe tearfully reveals to Danny that Evelyn is pregnant with Danny's child, the dying Danny tells Rafe that it is his child now. The Chinese rescue the group. After the war, Rafe and Evelyn observe Danny's grave with Evelyn's son, Danny; Rafe has Danny fly up in the air.
During a mission to intercept a [[Luftwaffe]] bombing raid, Rafe is shot down over the English Channel and is presumed killed in action. Danny and Evelyn mourn Rafe's death together, which spurs a romance between them. Meanwhile, [[Japan]] prepares to attack the US Pacific Fleet, deciding the best way to do so would be a decisive strike on the Pearl Harbor naval base.

On the night of December 6, Evelyn is shocked to discover Rafe standing outside her door, having survived his downing and the ensuing months trapped in Nazi-occupied France. He in turn discovers Danny's romance with Evelyn and leaves for the Hula bar, where he is welcomed back by his overjoyed fellow pilots. Danny finds a drunken Rafe in the bar with the intention of reconciling, but they get into a fight. When military police arrive, they flee the scene to avoid being put in the brig and fall asleep in Danny's car.

Next morning, on December 7, the [[Imperial Japanese Navy]] begins its [[attack on Pearl Harbor]]. The US Pacific Fleet is severely damaged in the surprise attack, and most of the defending airfields are obliterated before they can launch fighters to defend the harbor. Rafe and Danny take off in [[P-40]] fighter planes, and shoot down seven of the attacking planes. They later assist in the rescue of the crew of the capsized {{USS|Oklahoma|BB-37|6}}, but are too late to save them from the obliterated {{USS|Arizona|BB-39|6}}.

The next day, President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] delivers his [[Day of Infamy speech]] to the nation and requests that the US Congress declare a state of war with the [[Empire of Japan]]. The survivors attend a memorial service to honor the numerous dead. Danny and Rafe are both assigned to travel stateside under Doolittle, though they are not told why.

Before they leave, Evelyn reveals to Rafe that she is pregnant with Danny's child. She intends to stay with and devote herself to Danny for their child’s sake, but she vows that it is Rafe who she will always truly love.

Danny and Rafe are both promoted to captain and awarded the [[Silver Star]] for their actions at Pearl Harbor, and Doolittle asks them to volunteer for a secret mission. During the next three months, Rafe, Danny and other pilots train for ultra-short takeoffs with specially modified [[North American B-25 Mitchell|B-25 Mitchell]] bombers.

In April, the raiders are sent toward Japan on board {{USS|Hornet|CV-8|6}}. Their mission is to [[Doolittle raid|bomb Tokyo]], after which they will land in China. The mission is successful, but Rafe's and Danny's planes run out of fuel and crash in Japanese-occupied territory in China.

A gunfight ensues between the raiders and Japanese ground troops, and Danny is mortally wounded shielding Rafe before the group are rescued by Chinese soldiers. Rafe tearfully reveals to Danny that Evelyn is pregnant with Danny's child; with his dying breaths, Danny tells Rafe that it is his child now.

After the war, Rafe and Evelyn, now married, visit Danny's grave with Evelyn's son Danny. Rafe then asks his stepson if he would like to go flying, so they fly off into the sunset in the old biplane that Danny’s father once owned.


==Cast==
==Cast==
Line 145: Line 129:


===Marketing===
===Marketing===
Disney premiered the film at Pearl Harbor itself, aboard the active nuclear aircraft carrier {{USS|John C. Stennis}}, which made a six-day trip from San Diego to serve as "the world's largest and most expensive outdoor theater". More than 2,000 people attended the premiere on the ''Stennis'', which had special grandstand seating and one of the world's largest movie screens assembled on the flight deck.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Dao |first1=James |title=Carrier Turns Theater for Premiere of 'Pearl Harbor' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/22/us/carrier-turns-theater-for-premiere-of-pearl-harbor.html |access-date=15 October 2019 |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=22 May 2001}}</ref> The guests included various Hawaii political leaders, most of the lead actors from the film, and over 500 news media from around the world that Disney flew in to cover the event. The party was estimated to have cost Disney $5 million.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ryan |first1=Tim |last2=Kakesako |first2=Gregg K. |title=All hands on deck for 'Pearl Harbor' premiere |url=http://archives.starbulletin.com/2001/05/22/news/index.html |access-date=15 October 2019 |publisher=Honolulu Star-Bulletin |date=22 May 2001}}</ref>
The teaser trailer premiered in June 2000 in front of ''[[The Patriot (2000 film)|The Patriot]]''{{'}}s theatrical screenings.<ref>{{cite web|last=Head|first=Steve|title=Pearl Harbor Preview on Access Hollywood|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2000/06/26/pearl-harbor-preview-on-access-hollywood|publisher=IGN|access-date=October 26, 2024|date=June 26, 2000}}</ref> Disney premiered the film at Pearl Harbor itself, aboard the active nuclear aircraft carrier {{USS|John C. Stennis}}, which made a six-day trip from San Diego to serve as "the world's largest and most expensive outdoor theater". More than 2,000 people attended the premiere on the ''Stennis'', which had special grandstand seating and one of the world's largest movie screens assembled on the flight deck.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Dao |first1=James |title=Carrier Turns Theater for Premiere of 'Pearl Harbor' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/22/us/carrier-turns-theater-for-premiere-of-pearl-harbor.html |access-date=15 October 2019 |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=22 May 2001}}</ref> The guests included various Hawaii political leaders, most of the lead actors from the film, and over 500 news media from around the world that Disney flew in to cover the event. The party was estimated to have cost Disney $5 million.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ryan |first1=Tim |last2=Kakesako |first2=Gregg K. |title=All hands on deck for 'Pearl Harbor' premiere |url=http://archives.starbulletin.com/2001/05/22/news/index.html |access-date=15 October 2019 |publisher=Honolulu Star-Bulletin |date=22 May 2001}}</ref>


===Box office===
===Box office===
During its opening weekend, ''Pearl Harbor'' generated a total of $59 million, then made $75.1 million during its first four days.<ref name="MakingMarks">{{cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-may-29-ca-3706-story.html|title='Pearl Harbor' Making Its Marks|website=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=May 29, 2001 }}</ref> At the time, it achieved the second-highest [[Memorial Day]] weekend gross, behind ''[[The Lost World: Jurassic Park]]''.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-oshkosh-northwestern-pearl-harbor/131185681/ |title='Pearl Harbor' opens solidly, but won't break box office records |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230904045327/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-oshkosh-northwestern-pearl-harbor/131185681/ |date=May 28, 2001 |access-date=September 4, 2023 |archive-date=September 4, 2023 |page=12 |publisher=[[The Oshkosh Northwestern]] |via=[[Newspapers.com]] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref> The film also had the fourth-highest opening weekend, after the latter film, ''[[The Mummy Returns]]'' and ''[[Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace]]''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=104551&page=1|title=Box Office: Harbor Wins Weekend, Loses War|website=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]] }}</ref> For 15 years, it would have the highest opening weekend for a [[Ben Affleck]] film until 2016 when ''[[Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice]]'' surpassed it.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2016/03/batman-v-superman-opening-weekend-box-office-records-1201726300/|title=How 'Batman V Superman' Will Turn A Profit Despite Critical Kryptonite|author=Anthony D'Alessandro|website=[[Deadline Hollywood]]|date=March 28, 2016|access-date=March 29, 2016}}</ref> When the film was released, it topped the box office, knocking out ''[[Shrek]]''.<ref name="MakingMarks" /> It earned $30 million during its second weekend while staying at the number one spot ahead of the latter film, ''[[Moulin Rogue!]]'' and ''[[The Animal]]''.<ref>{{cite web|last=Linder|first=Brian|title=Weekend Box Office: Harbor Withstands Shrek Attack|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/06/05/weekend-box-office-harbor-withstands-shrek-attack|publisher=IGN|access-date=September 28, 2022|date=June 5, 2001}}</ref> This was the most recent film to top the box office for multiple weeks until that August when ''[[American Pie 2]]'' became the next one to do so.<ref>{{cite web|last=Linder|first=Brian|title=Weekend Box Office: Pie in the Face for Race|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/08/21/weekend-box-office-pie-in-the-face-for-race|publisher=IGN|access-date=July 13, 2022|date=August 21, 2001}}</ref> The film would then drop into third place behind ''[[Swordfish (film)|Swordfish]]'' and ''Shrek'', making $14.9 million.<ref>{{cite web|last=Linder|first=Brian|title=Weekend Box Office: Audiences Devour Swordfish|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/06/12/weekend-box-office-audiences-devour-swordfish|publisher=IGN|access-date=September 28, 2022|date=June 12, 2001}}</ref>
During its opening weekend, ''Pearl Harbor'' generated a total of $59 million, then made $75.1 million during its first four days.<ref name="MakingMarks">{{cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-may-29-ca-3706-story.html|title='Pearl Harbor' Making Its Marks|website=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=May 29, 2001 }}</ref> At the time, it achieved the second-highest [[Memorial Day]] weekend gross, behind ''[[The Lost World: Jurassic Park]]''.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-oshkosh-northwestern-pearl-harbor/131185681/ |title='Pearl Harbor' opens solidly, but won't break box office records |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230904045327/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-oshkosh-northwestern-pearl-harbor/131185681/ |date=May 28, 2001 |access-date=September 4, 2023 |archive-date=September 4, 2023 |page=12 |publisher=[[The Oshkosh Northwestern]] |via=[[Newspapers.com]] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref> The film also had the fourth-highest opening weekend, after the latter film, ''[[The Mummy Returns]]'' and ''[[Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace]]''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=104551&page=1|title=Box Office: Harbor Wins Weekend, Loses War|website=[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]] }}</ref> For 15 years, it would have the highest opening weekend for a [[Ben Affleck]] film until 2016 when ''[[Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice]]'' surpassed it.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2016/03/batman-v-superman-opening-weekend-box-office-records-1201726300/|title=How 'Batman V Superman' Will Turn A Profit Despite Critical Kryptonite|author=Anthony D'Alessandro|website=[[Deadline Hollywood]]|date=March 28, 2016|access-date=March 29, 2016}}</ref> When the film was released, it topped the box office, knocking out ''[[Shrek]]''.<ref name="MakingMarks" /> It earned $30 million during its second weekend while staying at the number one spot ahead of the latter film, ''[[Moulin Rouge!]]'' and ''[[The Animal]]''.<ref>{{cite web|last=Linder|first=Brian|title=Weekend Box Office: Harbor Withstands Shrek Attack|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/06/05/weekend-box-office-harbor-withstands-shrek-attack|publisher=IGN|access-date=September 28, 2022|date=June 5, 2001}}</ref> This was the most recent film to top the box office for multiple weeks until that August when ''[[American Pie 2]]'' became the next one to do so.<ref>{{cite web|last=Linder|first=Brian|title=Weekend Box Office: Pie in the Face for Race|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/08/21/weekend-box-office-pie-in-the-face-for-race|publisher=IGN|access-date=July 13, 2022|date=August 21, 2001}}</ref> The film would then drop into third place behind ''[[Swordfish (film)|Swordfish]]'' and ''Shrek'', making $14.9 million.<ref>{{cite web|last=Linder|first=Brian|title=Weekend Box Office: Audiences Devour Swordfish|url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2001/06/12/weekend-box-office-audiences-devour-swordfish|publisher=IGN|access-date=September 28, 2022|date=June 12, 2001}}</ref>


In Japan, the film opened on 424 screens and grossed $7.2 million in its opening weekend (including $1.6 million in previews), a record for [[Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures|Buena Vista International]] in Japan, and the sixth highest opening of all-time.<ref name=japan>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|page=13|date=July 23, 2001|title='Pearl Harbor' scores Japan hit|last=Groves|first=Don}}</ref> Meanwhile, ''Pearl Harbor'' generated a three-day gross of $4.5 million in the United Kingdom, becoming the country's fourth-highest June opening weekend, behind ''[[Batman & Robin (film)|Batman & Robin]]'', ''[[The Matrix]]'' and ''[[The Mummy (1999 film)|The Mummy]]''.<ref name="SetsO'seas">{{Cite news |last=Groves |first=Don |date=June 5, 2001 |title='Pearl Harbor' sets o'seas B.O. records |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |url=https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/pearl-harbor-sets-o-seas-b-o-records-1117800707/ |access-date=September 8, 2023 |archive-date=September 8, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230908235726/https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/pearl-harbor-sets-o-seas-b-o-records-1117800707/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It had a record opening in China, grossing $3.9 million in 6 days.<ref>{{cite magazine |magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |page=11 |date=August 20, 2001 |title='Pearl' passes 'Mummy' overseas |last=Boland |first=Michael |url=https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/harbor-s-high-seas-1117851428/ |quote=a record-shattering raid into China, where the pic garnered $3.9 million in six days }}</ref>
In Japan, the film opened on 424 screens and grossed $7.2 million in its opening weekend (including $1.6 million in previews), a record for [[Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures|Buena Vista International]] in Japan, and the sixth highest opening of all-time.<ref name=japan>{{cite magazine|magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]|page=13|date=July 23, 2001|title='Pearl Harbor' scores Japan hit|last=Groves|first=Don}}</ref> Meanwhile, ''Pearl Harbor'' generated a three-day gross of $4.5 million in the United Kingdom, becoming the country's fourth-highest June opening weekend, behind ''[[Batman & Robin (film)|Batman & Robin]]'', ''[[The Matrix]]'' and ''[[The Mummy (1999 film)|The Mummy]]''.<ref name="SetsO'seas">{{Cite news |last=Groves |first=Don |date=June 5, 2001 |title='Pearl Harbor' sets o'seas B.O. records |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |url=https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/pearl-harbor-sets-o-seas-b-o-records-1117800707/ |access-date=September 8, 2023 |archive-date=September 8, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230908235726/https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/pearl-harbor-sets-o-seas-b-o-records-1117800707/ |url-status=live }}</ref> It had a record opening in China, grossing $3.9 million in 6 days.<ref>{{cite magazine |magazine=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |page=11 |date=August 20, 2001 |title='Pearl' passes 'Mummy' overseas |last=Boland |first=Michael |url=https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/harbor-s-high-seas-1117851428/ |quote=a record-shattering raid into China, where the pic garnered $3.9 million in six days }}</ref> The film also made $2.5 million in Mexico, making it the fifth-highest opening for a live-action film in the country, trailing ''The Phantom Menace'', ''The Mummy Returns'', ''[[Mission: Impossible 2]]'' and ''[[Godzilla (1998 film)|Godzilla]]''.<ref name="EuropeBattle">{{Cite news |last=Groves |first=Don |date=June 18, 2001 |title='Harbor' in B.O. battle for Europe |work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] |url=https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/harbor-in-b-o-battle-for-europe-1117801611/ |access-date=August 28, 2024 |archive-date=August 28, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240828191902/https://variety.com/2001/film/box-office/harbor-in-b-o-battle-for-europe-1117801611/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Making $870,000, it was Argentina's second-highest opening of 2001, after ''[[Hannibal (2001 film)|Hannibal]]''.<ref name="EuropeBattle" />


''Pearl Harbor'' grossed $198,542,554 at the US and Canadian box office and $250,678,391 overseas for a worldwide total of $449,220,945, making this the [[2001 in film|sixth-highest-grossing film of 2001]].<ref name="mojo" /> It is also the third-highest-grossing romantic drama film of all time, as of January 2013, behind ''[[Titanic (1997 film)|Titanic]]'' and ''[[Ghost (1990 film)|Ghost]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=romanticdrama.htm |title=Romantic Drama Movies at the Box Office |work=Box Office Mojo |publisher=IMDb |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190125183325/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=romanticdrama.htm |archive-date=January 25, 2019 |url-status=dead |access-date=January 5, 2023 }}</ref>
''Pearl Harbor'' grossed $198,542,554 at the US and Canadian box office and $250,678,391 overseas for a worldwide total of $449,220,945, making this the [[2001 in film|sixth-highest-grossing film of 2001]].<ref name="mojo" /> It is also the third-highest-grossing romantic drama film of all time, as of January 2013, behind ''[[Titanic (1997 film)|Titanic]]'' and ''[[Ghost (1990 film)|Ghost]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=romanticdrama.htm |title=Romantic Drama Movies at the Box Office |work=Box Office Mojo |publisher=IMDb |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190125183325/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=romanticdrama.htm |archive-date=January 25, 2019 |url-status=dead |access-date=January 5, 2023 }}</ref>


===Home media===
===Home media===
''Pearl Harbor'' was released on [[VHS]] and [[DVD]] on December 4, 2001 by [[Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment|Buena Vista Home Entertainment]] (under the Touchstone Home Video label).<ref name="Harbor">{{cite web|url=http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011210/100490_1.html|title=Multimedia Available: Pearl Harbor: Massive Week One Sales of 7 Million Units|date=December 10, 2001|website=[[Business Wire]]|publisher=[[Berkshire Hathaway]]|via=[[Yahoo! Finance|Yahoo.com]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020124043232/http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011210/100490_1.html|archive-date=January 24, 2002|access-date=June 21, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Melinda|last=Saccone|url=http://www.hive4media.com/news/html/Industry_Article.cfm?article_id=2238|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011223115505/http://www.hive4media.com/news/html/Industry_Article.cfm?article_id=2238|title=Rental Spending Down for Week Ended Dec. 3, But December Holds Gifts|website=[[hive4media.com]]|archive-date=December 23, 2001|date=December 7, 2001|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> In its first week, it sold more than 7 million units and made more than $130 million in retail sales.<ref name="Harbor" /> The DVD release is [[THX]] certified and consists of two discs, while also featuring [[Dolby Headphone]] and [[DTS (company)|DTS]] audio tracks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.thedigitalbits.com/reviews2/pearlharbor60th.html|title=Pearl Harbor: 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition |website=The Digital Bits }}</ref>
''Pearl Harbor'' was released on [[VHS]] and [[DVD]] on December 4, 2001 by [[Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment|Buena Vista Home Entertainment]] (under the Touchstone Home Video label).<ref name="Harbor">{{cite web|url=http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011210/100490_1.html|title=Multimedia Available: Pearl Harbor: Massive Week One Sales of 7 Million Units|date=December 10, 2001|website=[[Business Wire]]|publisher=[[Berkshire Hathaway]]|via=[[Yahoo! Finance|Yahoo.com]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020124043232/http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011210/100490_1.html|archive-date=January 24, 2002|access-date=June 21, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Melinda|last=Saccone|url=http://www.hive4media.com/news/html/Industry_Article.cfm?article_id=2238|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011223115505/http://www.hive4media.com/news/html/Industry_Article.cfm?article_id=2238|title=Rental Spending Down for Week Ended Dec. 3, But December Holds Gifts|website=[[hive4media.com]]|archive-date=December 23, 2001|date=December 7, 2001|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> Both home video versions are [[THX]] certified, featuring a historical documentary and a music video, while also having the film split into two parts.<ref name="RememberingVideo">{{cite news |last=Zad |first=Martie |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-post-standard-remembering-pearl-harb/154475473/ |title=Remembering Pearl Harbor on DVD, video |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240902041012/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-post-standard-remembering-pearl-harb/154475473/ |date=December 2, 2001 |access-date=September 2, 2024 |archive-date=September 2, 2024 |page=143 |newspaper=The Washington Post |publisher=[[The Post-Standard]] |via=[[Newspapers.com]] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref> The VHS release has two separate cassettes and comes with widescreen and fullscreen versions.<ref name="RememberingVideo" /> As for the DVD release, it includes two separate discs that feature the first and second halves of the film, along with [[Dolby Headphone]] and [[DTS, Inc.|DTS]] audio tracks.<ref name="RememberingVideo" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.thedigitalbits.com/reviews2/pearlharbor60th.html|title=Pearl Harbor: 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition |website=The Digital Bits }}</ref> In its first week, the film sold more than 7 million units and made more than $130 million in retail sales.<ref name="Harbor" />


On July 2, 2002, Buena Vista Home Entertainment released the film on an R-rated four-disc Director's Cut DVD, which included about a minute of additional footage.<ref name="EnoughAlready">{{cite news |last=Staten |first=Vince |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-courier-journal-pearl-harbor-enou/141710294/ |title='Pearl Harbor': Enough Already
On July 2, 2002, Buena Vista Home Entertainment released the film on an R-rated four-disc Director's Cut DVD, which included about a minute of additional footage.<ref name="EnoughAlready">{{cite news |last=Staten |first=Vince |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-courier-journal-pearl-harbor-enou/141710294/ |title='Pearl Harbor': Enough Already
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240220193840/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-courier-journal-pearl-harbor-enou/141710294/ |date=June 29, 2002 |access-date=February 20, 2024 |archive-date=February 20, 2024 |page=93 |publisher=[[The Courier-Journal]] |via=[[Newspapers.com]] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Beierle |first1=Aaron |title=Pearl Harbor: Vista Series (Director's Cut) |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/4137/pearl-harbor-vista-series-directors-cut/ |website=DVD Talk |access-date=29 October 2019}}</ref>
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240220193840/https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-courier-journal-pearl-harbor-enou/141710294/ |date=June 29, 2002 |access-date=February 20, 2024 |archive-date=February 20, 2024 |page=93 |publisher=[[The Courier-Journal]] |via=[[Newspapers.com]] |url-status=live}} {{Open access}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Beierle |first1=Aaron |title=Pearl Harbor: Vista Series (Director's Cut) |url=https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/4137/pearl-harbor-vista-series-directors-cut/ |website=DVD Talk |access-date=29 October 2019}}</ref> This release also features three audio commentaries.<ref name="EnoughAlready" /> The first one has Michael Bay and [[Jeanine Basinger]], which was recorded 250 hours after the [[September 11 attacks]].<ref name="IGNVista">{{cite web |last= |date=June 18, 2002 |title=Pearl Harbor: Vista Series |url=https://www.ign.com/articles/2002/06/18/pearl-harbor-vista-series |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220928024158/https://www.ign.com/articles/2002/06/18/pearl-harbor-vista-series |archive-date=September 28, 2022 |access-date=September 28, 2022 |website=IGN |df=mdy-all}}</ref>

At the 5th Annual DVD awards, ''Pearl Harbor'' won the Best Audio Presentation category, tying with ''[[Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace]]''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.screendaily.com/phantom-menace-dominates-dvd-awards-in-los-angeles/4010250.article|title=Phantom Menace dominates DVD awards in Los Angeles|access-date=November 4, 2023|archive-date=August 11, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811101548/https://www.screendaily.com/phantom-menace-dominates-dvd-awards-in-los-angeles/4010250.article|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Reception==
==Reception==
===Critical response===
===Critical response===
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], the film holds an approval rating of 24% based on 194 reviews, with an average rating of 4.5/10. The site's critical consensus reads: "''Pearl Harbor'' tries to be the ''[[Titanic (1997 film)|Titanic]]'' of war movies, but it's just a tedious romance filled with laughably bad dialogue. The 40-minute action sequence is spectacular though."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1108389-pearl_harbor/|title=Pearl Harbor (2001)|website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]|access-date=September 17, 2020}}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film has a score of 44 out of 100 based on 35 reviews, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/movie/pearl-harbor "Pearl Harbor Reviews, Ratings, Credits, and More at Metacritic"] [[Metacritic]]. Retrieved: March 23, 2012.</ref> Audiences surveyed by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film a grade "A−" on scale of A to F.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Singer |first1=Matt |title=25 Movies With Completely Baffling CinemaScores |url=https://screencrush.com/movies-with-crazy-cinemascores/ |website=ScreenCrush |date=August 13, 2015 }}</ref>
On [[Rotten Tomatoes]], ''Pearl Harbor'' holds an approval rating of 24% based on 194 reviews, with an average rating of 4.5/10. The site's critical consensus reads: "''Pearl Harbor'' tries to be the ''[[Titanic (1997 film)|Titanic]]'' of war movies, but it's just a tedious romance filled with laughably bad dialogue. The 40-minute action sequence is spectacular though."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1108389-pearl_harbor/|title=Pearl Harbor (2001)|website=[[Rotten Tomatoes]]|access-date=September 17, 2020}}</ref> On [[Metacritic]], the film has a score of 44 out of 100 based on 35 reviews, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref>[https://www.metacritic.com/movie/pearl-harbor "Pearl Harbor Reviews, Ratings, Credits, and More at Metacritic"] [[Metacritic]]. Retrieved: March 23, 2012.</ref> Audiences surveyed by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film a grade "A−" on scale of A to F.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Singer |first1=Matt |title=25 Movies With Completely Baffling CinemaScores |url=https://screencrush.com/movies-with-crazy-cinemascores/ |website=ScreenCrush |date=August 13, 2015 }}</ref>


''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' critic [[Roger Ebert]] gave the film one and a half stars, writing: "''Pearl Harbor'' is a two-hour movie squeezed into three hours, about how, on Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese staged a surprise attack on an American love triangle. Its centerpiece is 40 minutes of redundant special effects, surrounded by a love story of stunning banality. The film has been directed without grace, vision, or originality, and although you may walk out quoting lines of dialogue, it will not be because you admire them." Ebert also criticized the liberties the film took with historical facts: "There is no sense of history, strategy or context; according to this movie, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because America cut off its oil supply, and they were down to an 18-month reserve. Would going to war restore the fuel sources? Did they perhaps also have imperialist designs? Movie doesn't say."<ref name="Ebert">[[Roger Ebert|Ebert, Roger]]. [https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pearl-harbor-2001 "'Pearl Harbor'."] ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'', May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009.</ref> In his later "Great Movies" essay on ''[[Lawrence of Arabia (film)|Lawrence of Arabia]]'', Ebert likewise wrote, "What you realize watching ''Lawrence of Arabia'' is that the word 'epic' refers not to the cost or the elaborate production, but to the size of the ideas and vision. [[Werner Herzog]]'s ''[[Aguirre, the Wrath of God]]'' didn't cost as much as the catering in ''Pearl Harbor'', but it is an epic, and ''Pearl Harbor'' is not."<ref>Ebert, Roger. [https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-lawrence-of-arabia-1962 "'Lawrence of Arabia'."] ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'', September 2, 2001. Retrieved: November 10, 2020.</ref>
''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' critic [[Roger Ebert]] gave the film one and a half stars, writing: "''Pearl Harbor'' is a two-hour movie squeezed into three hours, about how, on Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese staged a surprise attack on an American love triangle. Its centerpiece is 40 minutes of redundant special effects, surrounded by a love story of stunning banality. The film has been directed without grace, vision, or originality, and although you may walk out quoting lines of dialogue, it will not be because you admire them." Ebert also criticized the liberties the film took with historical facts: "There is no sense of history, strategy or context; according to this movie, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because America cut off its oil supply, and they were down to an 18-month reserve. Would going to war restore the fuel sources? Did they perhaps also have imperialist designs? Movie doesn't say."<ref name="Ebert">[[Roger Ebert|Ebert, Roger]]. [https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pearl-harbor-2001 "'Pearl Harbor'."] ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'', May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009.</ref> In his later "Great Movies" essay on ''[[Lawrence of Arabia (film)|Lawrence of Arabia]]'', Ebert likewise wrote, "What you realize watching ''Lawrence of Arabia'' is that the word 'epic' refers not to the cost or the elaborate production, but to the size of the ideas and vision. [[Werner Herzog]]'s ''[[Aguirre, the Wrath of God]]'' didn't cost as much as the catering in ''Pearl Harbor'', but it is an epic, and ''Pearl Harbor'' is not."<ref>Ebert, Roger. [https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-lawrence-of-arabia-1962 "'Lawrence of Arabia'."] ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'', September 2, 2001. Retrieved: November 10, 2020.</ref> Ed Gonzalez of ''[[Slant Magazine]]'' gave the film one out of four stars and wrote, "Middlingly racist, humorless, and downright inept, ''Pearl Harbor'' is solely for fans of [[fireworks]] factories."<ref name="slantmagazinerev">{{cite web |last1=Gonzalez |first1=Ed |title=Review: Pearl Harbor - Slant Magazine |url=https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/pearl-harbor/ |website=Slant Magazine.com |date=May 23, 2001 |publisher=Ed Gonzalez |accessdate=October 26, 2024}}</ref>


[[A. O. Scott]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' wrote, "Nearly every line of the script drops from the actors' mouths with the leaden clank of exposition, timed with bad sitcom beats."<ref name="Scott">Scott, A.O. [https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/25/arts/25PEAR.html "Pearl Harbor: War Is Hell, but Very Pretty."] ''[[The New York Times]]'', May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009.</ref> Mike Clark of ''[[USA Today]]'' gave the film two out of four stars and wrote, "Ships, planes and water combust and collide in ''Pearl Harbor'', but nothing else does in one of the wimpiest wartime romances ever filmed."<ref name="Clark">{{cite news |date=June 7, 2001 | last=Clark |first=Mike |newspaper=[[USA Today]] |url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/pearl-harbor/2001-05-25-pearl-harbor-review.htm |title='Pearl Harbor' sputters — until Japanese show up. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060916045846/https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/pearl-harbor/2001-05-25-pearl-harbor-review.htm |archive-date=2006-09-16 |access-date=2023-11-30 }}</ref>
[[A. O. Scott]] of ''[[The New York Times]]'' wrote, "Nearly every line of the script drops from the actors' mouths with the leaden clank of exposition, timed with bad sitcom beats."<ref name="Scott">Scott, A.O. [https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/25/arts/25PEAR.html "Pearl Harbor: War Is Hell, but Very Pretty."] ''[[The New York Times]]'', May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009.</ref> Mike Clark of ''[[USA Today]]'' gave the film two out of four stars and wrote, "Ships, planes and water combust and collide in ''Pearl Harbor'', but nothing else does in one of the wimpiest wartime romances ever filmed."<ref name="Clark">{{cite news |date=June 7, 2001 | last=Clark |first=Mike |newspaper=[[USA Today]] |url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/pearl-harbor/2001-05-25-pearl-harbor-review.htm |title='Pearl Harbor' sputters — until Japanese show up. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060916045846/https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/pearl-harbor/2001-05-25-pearl-harbor-review.htm |archive-date=2006-09-16 |access-date=2023-11-30 }}</ref>


In his review for ''[[The Washington Post]]'', [[Desson Howe]] wrote, "although this [[The Walt Disney Studios (division)|Walt Disney movie]] is based, inspired and even partially informed by a real event referred to as Pearl Harbor, the movie is actually based on the movies ''[[Top Gun]]'', ''[[Titanic (1997 film)|Titanic]]'' and ''[[Saving Private Ryan]]''. Don't get confused."<ref name="Howe">Howe, Desson. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/entertainment/movies/reviews/pearlharborhowe.htm "''Pearl Harbor'': Bombs Away."] ''[[Washington Post]]'', May 26, 2001. Retrieved: June 29, 2009.</ref> [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' magazine wrote, "Affleck, Hartnett and Beckinsale – a British actress without a single worthy line to wrap her credible American accent around – are attractive actors, but they can't animate this moldy romantic triangle."<ref name="Travers">{{cite magazine |date=May 25, 2001 |last=Travers |first=Peter |author1-link=Peter Travers |title=Pearl Harbor |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-reviews/pearl-harbor-109641/ |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070817081055/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948445/review/5948446/pearl_harbor |archive-date=August 17, 2007 |url-status=live |access-date=2023-11-30 }}</ref> ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine's [[Richard Schickel]] criticized the love triangle: "It requires a lot of patience for an audience to sit through the dithering. They're nice kids and all that, but they don't exactly claw madly at one another. It's as if they know that someday they're going to be part of "the Greatest Generation" and don't want to offend [[Tom Brokaw]]. Besides, megahistory and personal history never integrate here."<ref name="Schickel">Schickel, Richard. [https://web.archive.org/web/20010610124039/http://www.time.com/time/sampler/article/0,8599,128046,00.html "Mission: Inconsequential."] ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'', May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009. {{Dead link|date=March 2021}}</ref>
In his review for ''[[The Washington Post]]'', [[Desson Howe]] wrote, "although this [[The Walt Disney Studios (division)|Walt Disney movie]] is based, inspired and even partially informed by a real event referred to as Pearl Harbor, the movie is actually based on the movies ''[[Top Gun]]'', ''[[Titanic (1997 film)|Titanic]]'' and ''[[Saving Private Ryan]]''. Don't get confused."<ref name="Howe">Howe, Desson. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/entertainment/movies/reviews/pearlharborhowe.htm "''Pearl Harbor'': Bombs Away."] ''[[Washington Post]]'', May 26, 2001. Retrieved: June 29, 2009.</ref> [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' magazine wrote, "Affleck, Hartnett and Beckinsale – a British actress without a single worthy line to wrap her credible American accent around – are attractive actors, but they can't animate this moldy romantic triangle."<ref name="Travers">{{cite magazine |date=May 25, 2001 |last=Travers |first=Peter |author1-link=Peter Travers |title=Pearl Harbor |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-reviews/pearl-harbor-109641/ |magazine=[[Rolling Stone]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070817081055/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948445/review/5948446/pearl_harbor |archive-date=August 17, 2007 |url-status=live |access-date=2023-11-30 }}</ref> ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine's [[Richard Schickel]] criticized the love triangle: "It requires a lot of patience for an audience to sit through the dithering. They're nice kids and all that, but they don't exactly claw madly at one another. It's as if they know that someday they're going to be part of "the Greatest Generation" and don't want to offend [[Tom Brokaw]]. Besides, megahistory and personal history never integrate here."<ref name="Schickel">Schickel, Richard. [https://web.archive.org/web/20010610124039/http://www.time.com/time/sampler/article/0,8599,128046,00.html "Mission: Inconsequential."] ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'', May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009. {{Dead link|date=March 2021}}</ref> Robert W. Butler of ''[[The Kansas City Star]]'' wrote, "The dialogue is so unrelentingly banal as to make one reconsider whether [[James Cameron]]'s writing on ''Titanic'' was really all that bad."<ref>{{cite news |last=Butler |first=Robert W. |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-kansas-city-star-and-on-this-day-a/157872584/ |title=And on this day, a bomb dropped |date=May 25, 2001 |access-date=October 26, 2024 |page=104 |publisher=[[The Kansas City Star]] |via=[[Newspapers.com]] }}</ref>


''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' was more positive, giving the film a "B−" rating, and [[Owen Gleiberman]] praised the Pearl Harbor attack sequence: "Bay's staging is spectacular but also honorable in its scary, hurtling exactitude. ... There are startling point-of-view shots of torpedoes dropping into the water and speeding toward their targets, and though Bay visualizes it all with a minimum of graphic carnage, he invites us to register the terror of the men standing helplessly on deck, the horrifying split-second deliverance as bodies go flying and explosions reduce entire battleships to liquid walls of collapsing metal."<ref name="Gleiberman">{{cite magazine | last=Gleiberman |first=Owen |url=https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,256349,00.html |title='Jarhead' |magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]] |date=June 1, 2001 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131211101901/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,256349,00.html |archive-date=December 11, 2013 |url-status=dead |access-date=2023-11-30 }}</ref>
''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' was more positive, giving the film a "B−" rating, and [[Owen Gleiberman]] praised the Pearl Harbor attack sequence: "Bay's staging is spectacular but also honorable in its scary, hurtling exactitude. ... There are startling point-of-view shots of torpedoes dropping into the water and speeding toward their targets, and though Bay visualizes it all with a minimum of graphic carnage, he invites us to register the terror of the men standing helplessly on deck, the horrifying split-second deliverance as bodies go flying and explosions reduce entire battleships to liquid walls of collapsing metal."<ref name="Gleiberman">{{cite magazine | last=Gleiberman |first=Owen |url=https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,256349,00.html |title='Jarhead' |magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]] |date=June 1, 2001 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131211101901/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,256349,00.html |archive-date=December 11, 2013 |url-status=dead |access-date=2023-11-30 }}</ref>
Line 485: Line 471:


==Historical accuracy==
==Historical accuracy==
Like many [[Historical drama film|historical dramas]], ''Pearl Harbor'' provoked debate about the artistic license taken by its producers and director. [[National Geographic Channel]] produced a [[Documentary film|documentary]] called ''Beyond the Movie: Pearl Harbor'' detailing some of the ways that "the film's final cut didn't reflect all the attacks' facts, or represent them all accurately".<ref>[http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/ngbeyond/ "Beyond the Movie: Pearl Harbor."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060513041451/http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/ngbeyond/ |date=May 13, 2006 }} ''National Geographic Society'', 2001. Retrieved: March 26, 2009.</ref> The film was ranked number three on Careeraftermilitary.com's "10 Most Inaccurate Military Movies Ever Made," which also included ''[[The Patriot (2000 film)|The Patriot]]'', ''[[The Hurt Locker]]'', ''[[U-571 (film)|U-571]]'', ''[[The Green Berets (film)|The Green Berets]]'', ''[[Windtalkers]]'', ''[[Battle of the Bulge (1965 film)|Battle of the Bulge]]'', ''[[Red Tails]]'', ''[[Enemy at the Gates]]'' and ''[[Flyboys (film)|Flyboys]]'' on its list of falsified war movie productions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.careeraftermilitary.com/10-most-inaccurate-military-movies-ever-made/|title=10 Most Inaccurate Military Movies Ever Made|last=Barker|first=Chris|language=en-US|access-date=December 16, 2018}}</ref>
{{multiple image
|direction = horizontal
|width = 220
|footer =
|image1 = A6M3 Zero N712Z.jpg
|alt1 =
|caption1 = A late-model [[Mitsubishi A6M Zero|A6M3 Zero]] Model 22 in green camouflage used in the film.
|image2 = A6M2 Model 21 Zero MfrNo 500- side view- port.jpg
|alt2 =
|caption2 = Zeros involved in the [[attack on Pearl Harbor]] were of the A6M2 Model 21 series, painted in a light-color scheme ([[Imperial Japanese Navy|IJN]] gray green).<ref name="Mitsubishi A6M Zero-Sen">[http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/IJARG/a6mzero.htm "Mitsubishi A6M "Zero-Sen".] ''warbirdsresourcegroup.org.'' Retrieved: November 20, 2010.</ref> This example depicts a Zero from the [[Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū]].
}}
[[File:USS Constellation in Pearl Harbor Movie.jpg|thumb|The takeoff sequences for the [[Doolittle Raid]] were filmed on {{USS|Constellation|CV-64|6}}, a {{sclass|Kitty Hawk|aircraft carrier|2}} which did not enter service until 1961. Late production models of the [[North American B-25 Mitchell|B-25J]] were used instead of the early B-25B.]]

Like many [[Historical drama film|historical dramas]], ''Pearl Harbor'' provoked debate about the artistic license taken by its producers and director. [[National Geographic Channel]] produced a [[Documentary film|documentary]] called ''Beyond the Movie: Pearl Harbor''<ref>[http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/ngbeyond/ "Beyond the Movie: Pearl Harbor."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060513041451/http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/ngbeyond/ |date=May 13, 2006 }} ''National Geographic Society'', 2001. Retrieved: March 26, 2009.</ref> detailing some of the ways that "the film's final cut didn't reflect all the attacks' facts, or represent them all accurately". The film was ranked number three on Careeraftermilitary.com's "10 Most Inaccurate Military Movies Ever Made," which also included ''[[The Patriot (2000 film)|The Patriot]]'', ''[[The Hurt Locker]]'', ''[[U-571 (film)|U-571]]'', ''[[The Green Berets (film)|The Green Berets]]'', ''[[Windtalkers]]'', ''[[Battle of the Bulge (1965 film)|Battle of the Bulge]]'', ''[[Red Tails]]'', ''[[Enemy at the Gates]]'' and ''[[Flyboys (film)|Flyboys]]'' on its list of falsified war movie productions.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.careeraftermilitary.com/10-most-inaccurate-military-movies-ever-made/|title=10 Most Inaccurate Military Movies Ever Made|last=Barker|first=Chris|language=en-US|access-date=December 16, 2018}}</ref>

Many surviving victims of Pearl Harbor dismissed the film as grossly inaccurate and pure Hollywood. In an interview done by Frank Wetta, producer [[Jerry Bruckheimer]] was quoted saying: "We tried to be accurate, but it's certainly not meant to be a history lesson."<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor = 2677684|last1 = Wetta|first1 = Frank|last2 = Bay|first2 = Michael|last3 = Bruckheimer|first3 = Jerry|last4 = Wallace|first4 = Randall|title = Pearl Harbor|journal = The Journal of Military History|volume = 65|issue = 4|pages = 1138|doi = 10.2307/2677684|year = 2001}}</ref> Historian Lawrence Suid's review is particularly detailed as to the major factual misrepresentations of the film and the negative impact they have even on an entertainment film, as he notes that "the very name of the film implies that audiences will be witnessing a historic event, accurately rendered."<ref name="usni.org">{{cite web |last=Suid |first=Lawrence |url=http://www.usni.org/navalhistory/articles01/NHsuid8.html |title="Pearl Harbor: Bombed Again". |access-date=June 21, 2010 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010821171417/http://www.usni.org/navalhistory/articles01/NHsuid8.html |archive-date=August 21, 2001 }} ''Naval History'' (United States Naval institute), Vol. 15, No. 4, August 2001, p. 20.</ref>

The inclusion of Affleck's character in the Eagle Squadron is another inaccurate aspect of the film, since active-duty U.S. airmen were prohibited from joining the squadron, although some American civilians did join the RAF.<ref name="Eagle Squadrons">[http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/online-exhibitions/americans-in-the-royal-air-force/eagle-squadrons.aspx "Eagle Squadrons"], ''rafmuseum.org.uk''. Retrieved: June 22, 2010.</ref> The Battle of Britain had already ended in October 1940 whereas the film has it still happening in early 1941 with dogfights over the English Channel.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Boggs|first=Carl|author1-link=Carl Boggs|date=2006|title=Pearl Harbor: How Film Conquers History.|url=https://ocul-uwo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_07393140601005246&context=PC&vid=01OCUL_UWO:UWO_DEFAULT&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,pearl%20harbor%20(film)&offset=0|journal=New Political Science|volume=28|issue=4|pages=451–466|doi=10.1080/07393140601005246|s2cid=145151000|via=EBSCOhost}}</ref> None of the "[[Eagle Squadrons]]" of American volunteers saw action in Europe before 1941.<ref name="life1942110237">{{cite magazine | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JkAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA37| title=Eagles Switch to U. S. Army | magazine=Life | date=2 November 1942| page=37}}</ref>

One of the film's scenes shows Japanese aircraft targeting medical staff and the base's hospital. Although it was damaged in the attack, the Japanese did not deliberately target the U.S. naval hospital and only a single member of its medical staff was killed as he crossed the navy yard to report for duty.<ref>Clancey, Patrick. [http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/rep/Pearl/Medical.html "Pearl Harbor Navy Medical Activities."] ''iblio.com''. Retrieved: January 16, 2014.</ref>

Critics decried the use of fictional replacements for real people, declaring that ''Pearl Harbor'' was an "abuse of [[artistic license]]."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Padilla |first1=Lyle F. |first2=Raymond J. |last2=Castagnaro |url=http://www.voicenet.com/~lpadilla/pearl.html |title=Medal of Honor Recipients/Nominees Portrayed On Film: Hollywood Abominations, Pearl Harbor (2001) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060317042437/http://www.voicenet.com/~lpadilla/pearl.html |archive-date=March 17, 2006 |work=History, Legend and Myth: Hollywood and the Medal of Honor |year=2009 |access-date=March 26, 2009}}</ref> The roles the two male leads have in the attack sequence are analogous to the real historical deeds of [[United States Army Air Forces]] [[Second Lieutenant]]s [[George Welch (pilot)|George Welch]] and [[Kenneth M. Taylor]], who took to the skies in [[P-40 Warhawk]] aircraft during the Japanese attack and, together, claimed six Japanese aircraft and a few probables. Taylor, who died in November 2006, called the film adaptation "a piece of trash... over-sensationalized and distorted."<ref>Sullivan, Patricia. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/02/AR2006120201162.html "Kenneth Taylor; Flew Against Pearl Harbor Raiders."] ''Washington Post'', December 12, 2006. Retrieved: March 26, 2009.</ref><ref name=white>{{cite news|url=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6738785.ece|title=The 10 most historically inaccurate movies|last=White|first=Caroline|newspaper=The Sunday Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110615070116/http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6738785.ece|archive-date=June 15, 2011|access-date=November 15, 2013}}</ref>

The harshest criticism was aimed at instances in the film where actual historical events were altered for dramatic purposes. For example, Admiral Kimmel did not receive the report that a Japanese midget submarine was being attacked until after the bombs began falling, and did not receive the first official notification of the attack until several hours after the attack ended.<ref name="Sullivan p. 54">Sullivan 2001, p. 54.</ref>{{#tag:ref|[[President of the United States|President]] [[Franklin D. Roosevelt|Roosevelt]] did not receive the news of the Pearl Harbor attack from an aide or advisor who ran into the room. Rather, he was having lunch with [[Harry Hopkins]], a trusted friend, when he received a phone call from [[United States Secretary of the Navy|Secretary of the Navy]] [[Frank Knox]].<ref>[https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2001/winter/crafting-day-of-infamy-speech.html "Our Heritage in Documents: FDR's "Day of Infamy" Speech: Crafting a Call to Arms."] ''Prologue'', Winter 2001, Vol. 33, No. 4. Retrieved: May 23, 2010.</ref>|group=Note}}

The scene following the attack on Pearl Harbor, where President Roosevelt demands an immediate retaliatory strike on the soil of Japan, did not happen as portrayed in the film. [[Admiral Chester Nimitz]] and General George Marshall are seen denying the possibility of an aerial attack on Japan, but in real life they actually advocated such a strike. Another inconsistency in this scene is when President Roosevelt (who was at this time in his life, stricken and confined to a wheelchair due to [[Polio]]) is able to stand up to challenge his staff's distrust in a strike on Japan, which never really happened.<ref name="sfgate.com">{{Cite web|url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/Hollywood-vs-history-Historians-say-Pearl-2915944.php|title=Hollywood vs. history / Historians say 'Pearl Harbor's' version of the World War II attack is off the mark|first=Mick|last=LaSalle|date=May 29, 2001|website=SFGate}}</ref> During the same scene, a military advisor indicates that Japan was close to invading the continental United States, and could potentially expand "as far as Chicago;" in reality, Japan had neither the manpower nor the firepower to invade nearby Australia and Siberia, let alone the mainland United States.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/07/16/fact-check-military-limitations-stopped-japanese-invasion-not-guns/7954564002/|title=Fact Check: Armed citizens are not what stopped Japan from invading after Pearl Harbor |website=[[USA Today]] }}</ref>

In another scene Admiral Yamamoto says [[Isoroku Yamamoto's sleeping giant quote|"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant,"]] a quote which was copied from the 1970 film ''[[Tora! Tora! Tora!]]'', even though there is no printed evidence to prove Yamamoto made this statement or wrote it down.<ref name="usni.org"/>

The portrayal of the planning of the [[Doolittle Raid]], the air raid itself, and the raid's aftermath, is considered one of the most historically inaccurate portions of the film. In the film, [[Jimmy Doolittle]] and the rest of the Doolittle raiders had to launch from USS ''Hornet'' 624 miles off the Japanese coast and after being spotted by a few Japanese patrol boats. In actuality, the Doolittle raiders had to launch 650 miles off the Japanese coast and after being spotted by only one Japanese patrol boat. In the film, the only raiders shown in the raid are depicted as dropping their bombs on Tokyo, with some of the bomb blasts obliterating entire buildings. In actuality, the Doolittle raiders did bomb Tokyo but also targeted three other industrial cities, and the damage inflicted was minimal. Prior to the raid a chalkboard containing plans for the raid does accurately reflect other destination cities, but this is mostly obscured from view and never discussed in the dialogue.<ref>Gutthman, Edward. [http://www.mysanantonio.com/performance/article/Pearl-Hyped-Yet-Promising-Movie-to-honor-3302399.php "'Pearl' - Hyped, yet promising / Movie to honor vets, nation's wartime spirit."] ''MyUSA'', December 7, 2000.</ref><ref>Heines, Vivienne. [http://www.military.com/Content/MoreContent/?file=NL_pearlharbor_heines "Bringing 'Pearl Harbor' To Corpus Christi."] ''military.com'', August 1, 2000.</ref> The same chalkboard does mostly contain the names of the actual Doolittle Raiders in all but the 6th and 9th aircraft where the fictional names of the two main characters are substituted. The film shows the Doolittle raider airmen in China overcoming the Japanese soldiers in a short gun battle with help from a strafing B-25, which never happened in real life.<ref name="usni.org"/>

===Other inconsistencies and anachronisms===
{{More citations needed|section|date=November 2020}}
Numerous other inconsistencies and anachronisms are present in the film, and it appears that "little to no effort was used to try and hide or disguise modern warships to match the early 1940s setting."

Some other historical inaccuracies found in the film include the early childhood scenes depicting a [[Boeing-Stearman Model 75|Stearman biplane]] crop duster in 1923; the aircraft was not accurate for the period, as the first commercial crop-dusting company did not begin operation until 1924,<ref>Hanson, Dave. [http://www.daveswarbirds.com/usplanes/aircraft/kaydet.htm "Boeing/Stearman Model 75/PT-13/N2S."] ''daveswarbirds.com''. Retrieved: June 22, 2010.</ref> and the U.S. Department of Agriculture did not purchase its first cotton-dusting aircraft until April 16, 1926.<ref>[http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/milestones.asp?dec=Early_Years&sd=01/01/1900&ed=12/31/1939 "Monday, January 1, 1900 – Sunday, December 31, 1939."] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20120722100847/http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/milestones.asp?dec=Early_Years&sd=01/01/1900&ed=12/31/1939 |date=July 22, 2012 }} ''National Museum of the United States Air Force.'' Retrieved: January 18, 2011.</ref>{{#tag:ref|The "mischievous" Stearman flight is also unlikely, not only because Stearman did not produce his first aircraft until 1926. Less believably, the aircraft's engine starts, not by having someone swing the propeller, but at the flick of a switch, which would have required the engine being fitted with an electric switch, a very unlikely occurrence.|group=Note}} The crop duster in the first scene set in 1923 was not commercially available until the late 1930s.<ref name="sfgate.com"/>

The later series cannon armed [[Supermarine Spitfire|Spitfires]] used in the film were inaccurate, as the RAF had chiefly machine gun-armed Spitfire Mk I/IIs during the Battle of Britain. Limited number of early cannon-armed Spitfires Mk.IB served for brief time with [[No. 19 Squadron RAF]], but these proved to be too unreliable and were soon withdrawn from active service. They also differed slightly from later cannon-armed Spitfire versions, which possessed both autocannons and machine guns, as their armament consisted of single 20&nbsp;mm [[British Hispano cannon]] in each wing only.<ref name="Eagle Squadrons"/> Ben Affleck's Spitfire is painted with the insignia "RF" – this is an insignia of [[No. 303 Polish Fighter Squadron]].

A sailor has a pack of [[Marlboro (cigarette)|Marlboro Light]] cigarettes in his pocket, not introduced until 1972. In the beginning of the movie, a newsreel of 1940 is presented with combat footage in Europe, showing a [[M-26 Pershing]] tank fighting in the city of [[Cologne]], which did not happen until March 1945.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/battlecrete.html|title=The Battle of Crete|first=Russell|last=Hughes|date=December 29, 2015}}</ref> Earlier, a newsreel of the Battle of Britain in 1940 shows a [[Focke-Wulf Fw 190]], which did not see active service until 1941.

Actor [[Michael Milhoan]] is seen as an army major advising Admiral Kimmel about island air defenses on Oahu. On the morning of the attack, he is seen commanding a radar station. While playing chess he is addressed as "lieutenant" but, in a further inconsistency, is seen wearing the insignia of an army captain.

Four {{sclass|Spruance|destroyer|0}} destroyers tied abreast of each other at their pier are seen being bombed by the Japanese planes, although this class of ship only entered service with the US Navy in the 1970s. The retired ''Iowa''-class battleship [[USS Missouri (BB-63)|USS ''Missouri'']] was used to represent USS ''West Virginia'' for [[Doris Miller|Dorie Miller]]'s boxing match. ''West Virginia'' did not have the modernized World War II-era bridge and masts found on newer U.S. battleships until her reconstruction was finished in 1943, while the ''Iowa'' class did not enter service until 1943 onward. In one shot, the USS ''Arizona'' memorial is briefly visible in the background during a scene taking place several months before the attack. Miller is shown as a Petty Officer Second Class; but he was actually a Petty Officer Third Class.

Countless other technical lapses rankled film critics, such as Bay's decision to paint the Japanese Zero fighters green (most of the aircraft in the attack were painted light gray/white), even though he knew that was historically inaccurate, because he liked the way the aircraft looked and because it would help audiences differentiate the "good guys from the bad guys".<ref name="Cagle p. 51">Cagle 2001, p. 51.</ref>

One of Doolittle's trophies in a display case depicts a model of an [[F-86 Sabre]], which was not flown until 1947.

Late production models of the [[North American B-25 Mitchell|B-25J]] were used instead of the early B-25B.


Many Pearl Harbor survivors dismissed the film as grossly inaccurate and pure Hollywood. In an interview done by Frank Wetta, producer [[Jerry Bruckheimer]] was quoted saying: "We tried to be accurate, but it's certainly not meant to be a history lesson."<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor = 2677684|last1 = Wetta|first1 = Frank|last2 = Bay|first2 = Michael|last3 = Bruckheimer|first3 = Jerry|last4 = Wallace|first4 = Randall|title = Pearl Harbor|journal = The Journal of Military History|volume = 65|issue = 4|pages = 1138|doi = 10.2307/2677684|year = 2001}}</ref> Historian Lawrence Suid's review is particularly detailed as to the major factual misrepresentations of the film and the negative impact they have even on an entertainment film, as he notes that "the very name of the film implies that audiences will be witnessing a historic event, accurately rendered."<ref name="usni.org">{{cite web |last=Suid |first=Lawrence |url=http://www.usni.org/navalhistory/articles01/NHsuid8.html |title="Pearl Harbor: Bombed Again". |access-date=June 21, 2010 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010821171417/http://www.usni.org/navalhistory/articles01/NHsuid8.html |archive-date=August 21, 2001 }} ''Naval History'' (United States Naval institute), Vol. 15, No. 4, August 2001, p. 20.</ref>
Several shots of the aircraft carrier {{USS|Hornet|CV-8|6}} depicted it as having an angled flight deck, a technology that was not implemented until after the war, although no U.S. straight flight deck carriers exist anymore. While ''Hornet'' was portrayed by a World War II-era vessel ({{USS|Lexington|CV-16|6}}), ''Hornet'' was a {{sclass|Yorktown|aircraft carrier|2}} whereas ''Lexington'' was a modernized {{sclass|Essex|aircraft carrier|2}}.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.military.com/|title=Military and Veteran Benefits, News, Veteran Jobs|website=www.military.com}}</ref> The takeoff sequences for the [[Doolittle Raid]] were filmed on {{USS|Constellation|CV-64|6}}, a {{sclass|Kitty Hawk|aircraft carrier|2}} which did not enter service until 1961. As a supercarrier, ''Constellation'' has a much longer flight deck than the ''Yorktown'' or ''Essex''-class carriers, giving the B-25s a substantially longer (and safer) takeoff run.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.moviemistakes.com/film964|title=Pearl Harbor (2001) movie mistakes, goofs and bloopers|website=www.moviemistakes.com}}</ref> The Japanese carriers are portrayed more correctly by comparison: {{ship|Japanese aircraft carrier|Akagi||2}} and {{ship|Japanese aircraft carrier|Hiryū||2}} did have their bridge/conning tower superstructure on the port side rather than the more common starboard configuration. In the movie it was done by maneuvering an ''Essex''-class aircraft carrier backward to act as ''Akagi''.


The Battle of Britain had already ended in October 1940 whereas the film has it still happening in early 1941 with dogfights over the English Channel.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Boggs|first=Carl|author1-link=Carl Boggs|date=2006|title=Pearl Harbor: How Film Conquers History.|url=https://ocul-uwo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_07393140601005246&context=PC&vid=01OCUL_UWO:UWO_DEFAULT&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,pearl%20harbor%20(film)&offset=0|journal=New Political Science|volume=28|issue=4|pages=451–466|doi=10.1080/07393140601005246|s2cid=145151000|via=EBSCOhost}}</ref>
An establishing shot of the [[US Department of War]] building is clearly a shot of the exterior of the [[US Capitol Building]]. In 1941, the War Department was housed in the War Department Building in Washington's [[Foggy Bottom]] neighborhood (renamed the [[Harry S Truman Building]] in 2000) and in the [[Munitions Building]] on the [[National Mall]]. Neither structure bears any architectural resemblance to the building shown in the film.


Critics decried the use of fictional replacements for real people, declaring that ''Pearl Harbor'' was an "abuse of [[artistic license]]."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Padilla |first1=Lyle F. |first2=Raymond J. |last2=Castagnaro |url=http://www.voicenet.com/~lpadilla/pearl.html |title=Medal of Honor Recipients/Nominees Portrayed On Film: Hollywood Abominations, Pearl Harbor (2001) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060317042437/http://www.voicenet.com/~lpadilla/pearl.html |archive-date=March 17, 2006 |work=History, Legend and Myth: Hollywood and the Medal of Honor |year=2009 |access-date=March 26, 2009}}</ref> The roles the two male leads have in the attack sequence are analogous to the real historical deeds of [[United States Army Air Forces]] [[Second Lieutenant]]s [[George Welch (pilot)|George Welch]] and [[Kenneth M. Taylor]], who took to the skies in [[P-40 Warhawk]] aircraft during the Japanese attack and, together, claimed six Japanese aircraft and a few probables. Taylor called the film "a piece of trash... over-sensationalized and distorted."<ref>Sullivan, Patricia. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/02/AR2006120201162.html "Kenneth Taylor; Flew Against Pearl Harbor Raiders."] ''Washington Post'', December 12, 2006. Retrieved: March 26, 2009.</ref><ref name=white>{{cite news|url=http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6738785.ece|title=The 10 most historically inaccurate movies|last=White|first=Caroline|newspaper=The Sunday Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110615070116/http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article6738785.ece|archive-date=June 15, 2011|access-date=November 15, 2013}}</ref>
==In popular culture==
The soundtrack for the 2004 film ''[[Team America: World Police]]'' contains a song entitled "End of an Act". The song's chorus recounts, "''Pearl Harbor'' sucked, and I miss you" equating the singer's longing for his girlfriend to how much "Michael Bay missed the mark when he made ''Pearl Harbor''" which is "an awful lot, girl". The ballad contains other common criticisms of the film, concluding with the [[rhetorical question]] "Why does Michael Bay get to keep on making movies?"<ref>[http://www.lyricsbox.com/team-america-lyrics-pearl-harbor-qq12chv.html "Team America: End of an act lyrics."] ''lyricsbox.com''. Retrieved: March 25, 2009.</ref>


The scene following the attack on Pearl Harbor, where President Roosevelt demands an immediate retaliatory strike on the soil of Japan, did not happen as portrayed in the film. [[Admiral Chester Nimitz]] and General George Marshall are seen denying the possibility of an aerial attack on Japan, but in real life they actually advocated such a strike. Another inconsistency in this scene is when President Roosevelt (who was at this time in his life, stricken and confined to a wheelchair due to [[Polio]]) is able to stand up to challenge his staff's distrust in a strike on Japan, which never really happened.<ref name="sfgate.com">{{Cite web|url=https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/Hollywood-vs-history-Historians-say-Pearl-2915944.php|title=Hollywood vs. history / Historians say 'Pearl Harbor's' version of the World War II attack is off the mark|first=Mick|last=LaSalle|date=May 29, 2001|website=SFGate}}</ref>
The 2004 film ''[[Churchill: The Hollywood Years]]'', a [[satire]] on the [[Hollywood (film industry)|Hollywood]] take on history, references the portrayal of the American contribution to the [[Battle of Britain]] early in ''Pearl Harbor''.


The portrayal of the planning of the [[Doolittle Raid]], the air raid itself, and the raid's aftermath, is considered one of the most historically inaccurate portions of the film. In the film, [[Jimmy Doolittle]] and the rest of the Doolittle raiders had to launch from USS ''Hornet'' 624 miles off the Japanese coast and after being spotted by a few Japanese patrol boats. In actuality, the Doolittle raiders had to launch 650 miles off the Japanese coast and after being spotted by only one Japanese patrol boat. In the film, the only raiders shown in the raid are depicted as dropping their bombs on Tokyo, with some of the bomb blasts obliterating entire buildings. In actuality, the Doolittle raiders did bomb Tokyo but also targeted three other industrial cities, and the damage inflicted was minimal. Prior to the raid a chalkboard containing plans for the raid does accurately reflect other destination cities, but this is mostly obscured from view and never discussed in the dialogue.<ref>Gutthman, Edward. [http://www.mysanantonio.com/performance/article/Pearl-Hyped-Yet-Promising-Movie-to-honor-3302399.php "'Pearl' - Hyped, yet promising / Movie to honor vets, nation's wartime spirit."] ''MyUSA'', December 7, 2000.</ref><ref>Heines, Vivienne. [http://www.military.com/Content/MoreContent/?file=NL_pearlharbor_heines "Bringing 'Pearl Harbor' To Corpus Christi."] ''military.com'', August 1, 2000.</ref>
It is rumoured that the original script for Pearl Harbor was heavily influenced by [[Dark Blue World]], a film that focuses on Czech pilots who served in the Royal Air Force during World War II. Both films share similar plot elements, such as a love triangle and WWII aviation, and even a stuttering pilot, but there is no verifiable evidence to support the claim.
The Czech filmmakers, however, did provably offer their finished script to Disney before Pearl Harbor went into production and were ultimately rejected. <ref>{{Cite web |url=https://medium.seznam.cz/clanek/matous-musil-jsem-si-jisty-ze-to-je-ukradeny-rikal-jan-sverak-o-filmu-pearl-harbor-soudit-se-ale-nemohl-82093 |title=„I am sure it was stolen!" |website=Médium.cz |publisher=Seznam.cz, a.s. |access-date=27 August 2024}}</ref>


==Soundtrack==
==Soundtrack==
Line 609: Line 544:
{{Portal|Film}}
{{Portal|Film}}
* ''[[Sangam (1964 Hindi film)|Sangam]]'', an earlier 1964 [[Indian film]] with a strikingly similar storyline, but with only one friend being a pilot in ''Sangam'', whereas both are pilots in ''Pearl Harbor''.<ref>[https://www.scoopwhoop.com/entertainment/hollywood-movies-copied/ 10 Hollywood Movies That Were Inspired By Bollywood], Scoop Whoop, December 5, 2014</ref>{{Dubious|date=December 2023}}
* ''[[Sangam (1964 Hindi film)|Sangam]]'', an earlier 1964 [[Indian film]] with a strikingly similar storyline, but with only one friend being a pilot in ''Sangam'', whereas both are pilots in ''Pearl Harbor''.<ref>[https://www.scoopwhoop.com/entertainment/hollywood-movies-copied/ 10 Hollywood Movies That Were Inspired By Bollywood], Scoop Whoop, December 5, 2014</ref>{{Dubious|date=December 2023}}
* ''[[Tora! Tora! Tora!]]'', 1970 film about the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
* ''[[Tora! Tora! Tora!]]'', 1970 film about the Pearl Harbor attack.
* ''[[The Chinese Widow]]'', 2017 film about the story described in later half of movie ''Pearl Harbor'' in another viewpoint.
* ''[[The Chinese Widow]]'', 2017 film about the story described in later half of movie ''Pearl Harbor'' in another viewpoint.


Line 639: Line 574:
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Wikiquote}}
* {{IMDb title|0213149|Pearl Harbor}}
* {{IMDb title|0213149|Pearl Harbor}}
* {{amg movie|6649}}
* {{allMovie title|6649}}
* {{tcmdb title|id=344034}}
* {{TCMDb title|id=344034}}
* {{AFI film|244189}}
* {{AFI film|244189}}
* {{Metacritic film|title=Pearl Harbor}}
* {{Metacritic film|title=Pearl Harbor}}
Line 671: Line 606:
[[Category:Films about shot-down aviators]]
[[Category:Films about shot-down aviators]]
[[Category:Films about the United States Army Air Forces]]
[[Category:Films about the United States Army Air Forces]]
[[Category:World War II films based on actual events]]
[[Category:Pacific War films]]
[[Category:Pacific War films]]
[[Category:Films set in 1923]]
[[Category:Films set in 1923]]
Line 711: Line 645:
[[Category:Films set on aircraft carriers]]
[[Category:Films set on aircraft carriers]]
[[Category:2000s American films]]
[[Category:2000s American films]]
[[Category:English-language romantic drama films]]
[[Category:English-language war drama films]]
[[Category:Teen Choice Award winning films]]

Latest revision as of 06:29, 11 December 2024

Pearl Harbor
Theatrical release poster
Directed byMichael Bay
Written byRandall Wallace
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyJohn Schwartzman
Edited by
Music byHans Zimmer
Production
companies
Distributed byBuena Vista Pictures Distribution
Release dates
  • May 21, 2001 (2001-05-21) (Pearl Harbor, Hawaii)
  • May 25, 2001 (2001-05-25) (Mainland United States)
Running time
183 minutes[1]
CountryUnited States
Languages
  • English
  • Japanese
Budget$140 million[2][3]
Box office$449.2 million[2]

Pearl Harbor is a 2001 American romantic war drama film directed by Michael Bay, produced by Bay and Jerry Bruckheimer and written by Randall Wallace. Starring Ben Affleck, Kate Beckinsale, Josh Hartnett, Cuba Gooding Jr., Tom Sizemore, Jon Voight, Colm Feore, and Alec Baldwin, the film features a heavily fictionalized version of the attack on Pearl Harbor, focusing on a love story set amidst the lead up to the attack, its aftermath, and the Doolittle Raid.

The film was a box office success, grossing $59 million in its opening weekend and $449.2 million worldwide, becoming the sixth-highest-grossing film of 2001,[2] but received negative reviews from critics, who criticized the story, long runtime, screenplay and dialogue, pacing, performances and historical inaccuracies. It was nominated for four Academy Awards, winning in the category of Best Sound Editing. It was also nominated for six Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture.

Plot

[edit]

In 1923, in Tennessee, two best friends, Rafe McCawley and Danny Walker, pretend to be fighting airmen. Rafe defends Danny from Danny's stern father, a World War One veteran suffering from PTSD.

In January 1941, as World War II rages, Danny and Rafe are USAAC first lieutenants under the command of Major Jimmy Doolittle. Doolittle informs Rafe that he has been accepted into the Eagle Squadron, an RAF outfit for American pilots in the Battle of Britain. Nurse Evelyn Johnson passes Rafe's medical exam despite his dyslexia, and the two form a relationship. Rafe tells Evelyn he is leaving to join the Eagle Squadron. During a mission to intercept a Luftwaffe bombing raid, Rafe is shot down over the English Channel and is presumed killed in action. Danny and Evelyn mourn Rafe's death, which spurs a romance between the two. However, Rafe managed to survive and is found by French fishermen.

On the night of December 6, Evelyn is shocked when Rafe returns, having survived and escaped Nazi-occupied France. Rafe, in turn, discovers Danny's romance with Evelyn and leaves for the Hula bar, where Danny attempts to explain, but a fight ensues. When MPs arrive, they flee to avoid the brig. The next morning, December 7, the Imperial Japanese Navy attack Pearl Harbor. The US Pacific Fleet is severely damaged, and most of the defending airfields are obliterated. Rafe and Danny take off in P-40 fighter planes and shoot down seven attacking planes. They later assist in rescuing the crew of the capsized USS Oklahoma but fail to save the crew of the obliterated USS Arizona.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt requests that the US Congress declare war on the Empire of Japan. Danny and Rafe are assigned to Doolittle. Before they leave, Evelyn reveals to Rafe that she is pregnant with Danny's child; she intends to stay with and devote herself to Danny, but she vows that it is Rafe who she will always genuinely love. Danny and Rafe are promoted to captain and awarded the Silver Star for their actions at Pearl Harbor, and Doolittle asks them to volunteer for a secret mission. During the next three months, Rafe, Danny, and other pilots train for ultra-short takeoffs with specially modified B-25s. In April, the raiders on board the USS Hornet find their mission is to bomb Tokyo, after which they will land in China. The mission is successful, and Rafe's and Danny's planes crash in China. While the raiders fight off Japanese soldiers, Danny is shot; when Rafe tearfully reveals to Danny that Evelyn is pregnant with Danny's child, the dying Danny tells Rafe that it is his child now. The Chinese rescue the group. After the war, Rafe and Evelyn observe Danny's grave with Evelyn's son, Danny; Rafe has Danny fly up in the air.

Cast

[edit]

Fictional characters

[edit]

Historical characters

[edit]

Although not intended to be an entirely accurate depiction of events, the film includes portrayals of several historical figures:

Production

[edit]
A 1940 LaSalle taxi featured in Pearl Harbor

The proposed budget of $208 million that Michael Bay and Jerry Bruckheimer wanted was an area of contention with Walt Disney Studios executives, since a great deal of the budget was to be expended on production aspects. The budget was eventually reduced to $140 million.[2] Even at the reduced budget, Disney managed to get many of the crew and others to defer some of their pay until the film grossed in the region of $140 million. This included the director of photography, the editor, production designer and lighting director and their departments deferring around $5 to $10 million as well as Panavision, Technicolor and Industrial Light & Magic also agreeing to deferrals. Bay also deferred his salary but he and Bruckheimer were the only ones to receive profit participation.[4]

Also controversial was the effort to change the film's rating from R to PG-13. Bay initially wanted to graphically portray the horrors of war and was not interested in primarily marketing the final product to a teen and young adult audience. However, even though he wanted to make an R-rated movie, Bay admitted that the problem was that young children would not be able to see it, and he felt that they should. As such, when he was ordered by Disney to make a PG-13 film, he didn't argue. As a compromise, he was allowed to release an R-rated Director's Cut on DVD later on in 2002. Budget fights continued throughout the planning of the film, with Bay "walking" on several occasions. Dick Cook, chairman of Disney at the time, said "I think Pearl Harbor was one of the most difficult shoots of modern history."[5]

In order to recreate the atmosphere of pre-war Pearl Harbor, the producers staged the film in Hawaii and used current naval facilities. Many active duty military members stationed in Hawaii and members of the local population served as extras during the filming. The set at Rosarito Beach in the Mexican state of Baja California was used for scale model work as required. Formerly the set of Titanic (1997), Rosarito was the ideal location to recreate the death throes of the battleships in the Pearl Harbor attack. A large-scale model of the bow section of USS Oklahoma mounted on the world's largest gimbal produced an authentic rolling and submerging of the doomed battleship. Production Engineer Nigel Phelps stated that the sequence of the ship rolling out of the water and slapping down would involve one of the "biggest set elements" to be staged. Matched with computer generated imagery, the action had to reflect precision and accuracy throughout.[6] Production was due to commence April 8, 2000 for 85 days.[4]

Michael Fassbender read for the part of Rafe, Fassbender said that Disney sent him a "really nice note" telling him that he didn't get the part.[7] Charlize Theron turned down a role in the film so that she could star in Sweet November.[8]

The vessel most seen in the movie was USS Lexington, representing both USS Hornet and a Japanese carrier. All aircraft take-offs during the movie were filmed on board the Lexington, a museum ship in Corpus Christi, Texas. The aircraft on display were removed for filming and were replaced with film aircraft as well as World War II anti-aircraft turrets. Other ships used in filler scenes included USS Hornet,[9] and USS Constellation during filming for the carrier sequences. Filming was also done on board the museum battleship USS Texas located near Houston, Texas. The Naval Historical Center of the United States army was involved in the production of the film, the Center suggested changing the depiction of Doolittle who they considered to be written as "a boorish, oafish guy", this recommendation was accepted.[10]

Release

[edit]

Marketing

[edit]

The teaser trailer premiered in June 2000 in front of The Patriot's theatrical screenings.[11] Disney premiered the film at Pearl Harbor itself, aboard the active nuclear aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis, which made a six-day trip from San Diego to serve as "the world's largest and most expensive outdoor theater". More than 2,000 people attended the premiere on the Stennis, which had special grandstand seating and one of the world's largest movie screens assembled on the flight deck.[12] The guests included various Hawaii political leaders, most of the lead actors from the film, and over 500 news media from around the world that Disney flew in to cover the event. The party was estimated to have cost Disney $5 million.[13]

Box office

[edit]

During its opening weekend, Pearl Harbor generated a total of $59 million, then made $75.1 million during its first four days.[14] At the time, it achieved the second-highest Memorial Day weekend gross, behind The Lost World: Jurassic Park.[15] The film also had the fourth-highest opening weekend, after the latter film, The Mummy Returns and Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace.[16] For 15 years, it would have the highest opening weekend for a Ben Affleck film until 2016 when Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice surpassed it.[17] When the film was released, it topped the box office, knocking out Shrek.[14] It earned $30 million during its second weekend while staying at the number one spot ahead of the latter film, Moulin Rouge! and The Animal.[18] This was the most recent film to top the box office for multiple weeks until that August when American Pie 2 became the next one to do so.[19] The film would then drop into third place behind Swordfish and Shrek, making $14.9 million.[20]

In Japan, the film opened on 424 screens and grossed $7.2 million in its opening weekend (including $1.6 million in previews), a record for Buena Vista International in Japan, and the sixth highest opening of all-time.[21] Meanwhile, Pearl Harbor generated a three-day gross of $4.5 million in the United Kingdom, becoming the country's fourth-highest June opening weekend, behind Batman & Robin, The Matrix and The Mummy.[22] It had a record opening in China, grossing $3.9 million in 6 days.[23] The film also made $2.5 million in Mexico, making it the fifth-highest opening for a live-action film in the country, trailing The Phantom Menace, The Mummy Returns, Mission: Impossible 2 and Godzilla.[24] Making $870,000, it was Argentina's second-highest opening of 2001, after Hannibal.[24]

Pearl Harbor grossed $198,542,554 at the US and Canadian box office and $250,678,391 overseas for a worldwide total of $449,220,945, making this the sixth-highest-grossing film of 2001.[2] It is also the third-highest-grossing romantic drama film of all time, as of January 2013, behind Titanic and Ghost.[25]

Home media

[edit]

Pearl Harbor was released on VHS and DVD on December 4, 2001 by Buena Vista Home Entertainment (under the Touchstone Home Video label).[26][27] Both home video versions are THX certified, featuring a historical documentary and a music video, while also having the film split into two parts.[28] The VHS release has two separate cassettes and comes with widescreen and fullscreen versions.[28] As for the DVD release, it includes two separate discs that feature the first and second halves of the film, along with Dolby Headphone and DTS audio tracks.[28][29] In its first week, the film sold more than 7 million units and made more than $130 million in retail sales.[26]

On July 2, 2002, Buena Vista Home Entertainment released the film on an R-rated four-disc Director's Cut DVD, which included about a minute of additional footage.[30][31] This release also features three audio commentaries.[30] The first one has Michael Bay and Jeanine Basinger, which was recorded 250 hours after the September 11 attacks.[32]

At the 5th Annual DVD awards, Pearl Harbor won the Best Audio Presentation category, tying with Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace.[33]

Reception

[edit]

Critical response

[edit]

On Rotten Tomatoes, Pearl Harbor holds an approval rating of 24% based on 194 reviews, with an average rating of 4.5/10. The site's critical consensus reads: "Pearl Harbor tries to be the Titanic of war movies, but it's just a tedious romance filled with laughably bad dialogue. The 40-minute action sequence is spectacular though."[34] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 44 out of 100 based on 35 reviews, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[35] Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film a grade "A−" on scale of A to F.[36]

Chicago Sun-Times critic Roger Ebert gave the film one and a half stars, writing: "Pearl Harbor is a two-hour movie squeezed into three hours, about how, on Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese staged a surprise attack on an American love triangle. Its centerpiece is 40 minutes of redundant special effects, surrounded by a love story of stunning banality. The film has been directed without grace, vision, or originality, and although you may walk out quoting lines of dialogue, it will not be because you admire them." Ebert also criticized the liberties the film took with historical facts: "There is no sense of history, strategy or context; according to this movie, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because America cut off its oil supply, and they were down to an 18-month reserve. Would going to war restore the fuel sources? Did they perhaps also have imperialist designs? Movie doesn't say."[37] In his later "Great Movies" essay on Lawrence of Arabia, Ebert likewise wrote, "What you realize watching Lawrence of Arabia is that the word 'epic' refers not to the cost or the elaborate production, but to the size of the ideas and vision. Werner Herzog's Aguirre, the Wrath of God didn't cost as much as the catering in Pearl Harbor, but it is an epic, and Pearl Harbor is not."[38] Ed Gonzalez of Slant Magazine gave the film one out of four stars and wrote, "Middlingly racist, humorless, and downright inept, Pearl Harbor is solely for fans of fireworks factories."[39]

A. O. Scott of The New York Times wrote, "Nearly every line of the script drops from the actors' mouths with the leaden clank of exposition, timed with bad sitcom beats."[40] Mike Clark of USA Today gave the film two out of four stars and wrote, "Ships, planes and water combust and collide in Pearl Harbor, but nothing else does in one of the wimpiest wartime romances ever filmed."[41]

In his review for The Washington Post, Desson Howe wrote, "although this Walt Disney movie is based, inspired and even partially informed by a real event referred to as Pearl Harbor, the movie is actually based on the movies Top Gun, Titanic and Saving Private Ryan. Don't get confused."[42] Peter Travers of Rolling Stone magazine wrote, "Affleck, Hartnett and Beckinsale – a British actress without a single worthy line to wrap her credible American accent around – are attractive actors, but they can't animate this moldy romantic triangle."[43] Time magazine's Richard Schickel criticized the love triangle: "It requires a lot of patience for an audience to sit through the dithering. They're nice kids and all that, but they don't exactly claw madly at one another. It's as if they know that someday they're going to be part of "the Greatest Generation" and don't want to offend Tom Brokaw. Besides, megahistory and personal history never integrate here."[44] Robert W. Butler of The Kansas City Star wrote, "The dialogue is so unrelentingly banal as to make one reconsider whether James Cameron's writing on Titanic was really all that bad."[45]

Entertainment Weekly was more positive, giving the film a "B−" rating, and Owen Gleiberman praised the Pearl Harbor attack sequence: "Bay's staging is spectacular but also honorable in its scary, hurtling exactitude. ... There are startling point-of-view shots of torpedoes dropping into the water and speeding toward their targets, and though Bay visualizes it all with a minimum of graphic carnage, he invites us to register the terror of the men standing helplessly on deck, the horrifying split-second deliverance as bodies go flying and explosions reduce entire battleships to liquid walls of collapsing metal."[46]

In his review for The New York Observer, Andrew Sarris wrote, "here is the ironic twist in my acceptance of Pearl Harbor – the parts I liked most are the parts before and after the digital destruction of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese carrier planes" and felt that "Pearl Harbor is not so much about World War II as it is about movies about World War II. And what's wrong with that?"[47]

Critics in Japan received the film more positively than in most countries with one likening it to Gone with the Wind set during World War II and another describing it as more realistic than Tora! Tora! Tora![21]

In 2023, Rolling Stone cited Bay's direction of Pearl Harbor as one of the fifty worst decisions in film history. Andy Greene described it as a less successful attempt to replicate the success of Titanic and Bay's previous film, Armageddon.[48]

Accolades

[edit]

The film was nominated for four Academy Awards, winning in the category of Best Sound Editing. It was also nominated for six Golden Raspberry Awards, including Worst Picture.[49] This marked the first occurrence of a Worst Picture-nominated film winning an Academy Award; it is also the only film directed by Bay to win an Academy Award.[citation needed]

Award Category Recipient Result Ref.
Academy Awards Best Original Song "There You'll Be"
Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren
Nominated [50]
Best Sound Kevin O'Connell, Greg P. Russell, and Peter J. Devlin Nominated
Best Sound Editing George Watters II and Christopher Boyes Won
Best Visual Effects Eric Brevig, John Frazier, Ed Hirsh, and Ben Snow Nominated
American Society of Cinematographers Awards Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography in Theatrical Releases John Schwartzman Nominated [51]
ASCAP Film and Television Music Awards Top Box Office Films Hans Zimmer Won
Most Performed Songs from Motion Pictures "There You'll Be"
Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren
Won
Awards Circuit Community Awards Best Original Score Hans Zimmer Nominated
Best Visual Effects Nominated
Bogey Awards Nominated
Critics' Choice Awards Best Song "There You'll Be"
Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren
Nominated [52]
Cinema Audio Society Awards Outstanding Achievement in Sound Mixing for Motion Pictures Kevin O'Connell, Greg P. Russell, and Peter J. Devlin Nominated [53]
DVD Exclusive Awards Best Overall New Extra Features, New Release Michael Bay, Mark Palansky, David Prior, and Eric Young Nominated [54]
Best New, Enhanced or Reconstructed Movie Scenes Michael Bay Nominated
Original Retrospective Documentary, New Release Doug McCallie Nominated
Best Menu Design David Prior Nominated
Golden Globe Awards Best Original Score – Motion Picture Hans Zimmer Nominated [55]
Best Original Song – Motion Picture "There You'll Be"
Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren
Nominated
Golden Raspberry Awards (2001) Worst Picture Nominated [56]
Worst Director Michael Bay Nominated
Worst Actor Ben Affleck Nominated
Worst Screenplay Randall Wallace Nominated
Worst Screen Couple Ben Affleck and either Kate Beckinsale or Josh Hartnett Nominated
Worst Remake or Sequel Nominated
Golden Raspberry Awards (2009) Worst Actor of the Decade Ben Affleck (also for Daredevil, Gigli, Jersey Girl, Paycheck, and Surviving Christmas) Nominated [57]
Golden Reel Awards Best Sound Editing – Dialogue & ADR, Domestic Feature Film George Watters II, Christopher T. Welch, Teri E. Dorman, Julie Feiner,
Cindy Marty, Michelle Pazer, David A. Arnold, Marshall Winn,
Ulrika Akander, and Allen Hartz
Nominated [58]
Best Sound Editing – Sound Effects & Foley, Domestic Feature Film Christopher Boyes, George Watters II, Victoria Martin, Ethan Van der Ryn,
Beau Borders, Scott Guitteau, Suhail Kafity, Adam Kopald, F. Hudson Miller,
R.J. Palmer, Christopher Scarabosio, Robert L. Sephton, Matthew Harrison,
James Likowski, and Gary Wright
Nominated
Golden Rooster Awards Best Translated Film Won
Golden Schmoes Awards Worst Movie of the Year Nominated [59]
Best Special Effects of the Year Nominated
Biggest Disappointment of the Year Nominated
Best Trailer of the Year Nominated
Best Action Sequence of the Year "Attack on Pearl Harbor" Nominated
Most Memorable Scene in a Movie Nominated
Golden Screen Awards Won
Golden Trailer Awards Best Action Nominated
GoldSpirit Awards Best Soundtrack Hans Zimmer Nominated
Best Drama Soundtrack Won
Grammy Awards Best Song Written for a Motion Picture, Television or Other Visual Media "There You'll Be" – Diane Warren Nominated [60]
Harry Awards Nominated
Huabiao Awards Outstanding Translated Foreign Film Won
MTV Asia Awards Favorite Movie Nominated
MTV Movie Awards Best Male Performance Josh Hartnett Nominated [61]
Best Female Performance Kate Beckinsale Nominated
Best Action Sequence "The Attack Scene" Won
Online Film & Television Association Awards Best Original Song "There You'll Be"
Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren
Nominated [62]
Best Sound Nominated
Best Sound Editing Nominated
Best Visual Effects Nominated
Phoenix Film Critics Society Awards Best Visual Effects Eric Brevig, John Frazier, Ed Hirsh, and Ben Snow Nominated [63]
Satellite Awards Best Cinematography John Schwartzman Nominated [64]
Best Original Song "There You'll Be"
Music and Lyrics by Diane Warren
Nominated
Best Visual Effects Eric Brevig Nominated
Stinkers Bad Movie Awards Worst Picture Nominated [65]
Worst Sense of Direction Michael Bay Nominated
Worst Screenplay for a Film Grossing More Than $100M Worldwide Using Hollywood Math Randall Wallace Won
Teen Choice Awards Choice Movie – Drama/Action Adventure Won [66]
Choice Movie Actor Ben Affleck Won
Josh Hartnett Nominated
Choice Movie Chemistry Ben Affleck and Kate Beckinsale Nominated
World Soundtrack Awards Soundtrack Composer of the Year Hans Zimmer (also for An Everlasting Piece, Hannibal, and The Pledge) Nominated [67]
World Stunt Awards Best Aerial Work Gene Armstrong, Will Bonafas, James Gavin, John Hinton, Steve Hinton,
Gary Hudson, Kevin La Rosa, John Maloney, Bill Powers, Alan Preston,
Allan Purwyn, James Ryan, and John Storrie
Nominated [68]
Best Stunt Coordination – Feature Film Kenny Bates Nominated
Best Stunt Coordination – Sequence Kenny Bates, Andy Gill, and Steve Picerni Won
Yoga Awards Worst Foreign Actor Ben Affleck Won

Historical accuracy

[edit]

Like many historical dramas, Pearl Harbor provoked debate about the artistic license taken by its producers and director. National Geographic Channel produced a documentary called Beyond the Movie: Pearl Harbor detailing some of the ways that "the film's final cut didn't reflect all the attacks' facts, or represent them all accurately".[69] The film was ranked number three on Careeraftermilitary.com's "10 Most Inaccurate Military Movies Ever Made," which also included The Patriot, The Hurt Locker, U-571, The Green Berets, Windtalkers, Battle of the Bulge, Red Tails, Enemy at the Gates and Flyboys on its list of falsified war movie productions.[70]

Many Pearl Harbor survivors dismissed the film as grossly inaccurate and pure Hollywood. In an interview done by Frank Wetta, producer Jerry Bruckheimer was quoted saying: "We tried to be accurate, but it's certainly not meant to be a history lesson."[71] Historian Lawrence Suid's review is particularly detailed as to the major factual misrepresentations of the film and the negative impact they have even on an entertainment film, as he notes that "the very name of the film implies that audiences will be witnessing a historic event, accurately rendered."[72]

The Battle of Britain had already ended in October 1940 whereas the film has it still happening in early 1941 with dogfights over the English Channel.[73]

Critics decried the use of fictional replacements for real people, declaring that Pearl Harbor was an "abuse of artistic license."[74] The roles the two male leads have in the attack sequence are analogous to the real historical deeds of United States Army Air Forces Second Lieutenants George Welch and Kenneth M. Taylor, who took to the skies in P-40 Warhawk aircraft during the Japanese attack and, together, claimed six Japanese aircraft and a few probables. Taylor called the film "a piece of trash... over-sensationalized and distorted."[75][76]

The scene following the attack on Pearl Harbor, where President Roosevelt demands an immediate retaliatory strike on the soil of Japan, did not happen as portrayed in the film. Admiral Chester Nimitz and General George Marshall are seen denying the possibility of an aerial attack on Japan, but in real life they actually advocated such a strike. Another inconsistency in this scene is when President Roosevelt (who was at this time in his life, stricken and confined to a wheelchair due to Polio) is able to stand up to challenge his staff's distrust in a strike on Japan, which never really happened.[77]

The portrayal of the planning of the Doolittle Raid, the air raid itself, and the raid's aftermath, is considered one of the most historically inaccurate portions of the film. In the film, Jimmy Doolittle and the rest of the Doolittle raiders had to launch from USS Hornet 624 miles off the Japanese coast and after being spotted by a few Japanese patrol boats. In actuality, the Doolittle raiders had to launch 650 miles off the Japanese coast and after being spotted by only one Japanese patrol boat. In the film, the only raiders shown in the raid are depicted as dropping their bombs on Tokyo, with some of the bomb blasts obliterating entire buildings. In actuality, the Doolittle raiders did bomb Tokyo but also targeted three other industrial cities, and the damage inflicted was minimal. Prior to the raid a chalkboard containing plans for the raid does accurately reflect other destination cities, but this is mostly obscured from view and never discussed in the dialogue.[78][79]

Soundtrack

[edit]
Pearl Harbor: Music from the Motion Picture
Soundtrack album by
ReleasedMay 22, 2001 (2001-05-22)
GenreFilm score
Length46:21
Label
Producer
Hans Zimmer chronology
Riding in Cars with Boys
(2001)
Pearl Harbor: Music from the Motion Picture
(2001)
Hannibal
(2001)

The soundtrack to Pearl Harbor on Hollywood Records was nominated for the Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score (Moulin Rouge! won).[80] The original score was composed by Hans Zimmer. The song "There You'll Be" was nominated for the Academy Award and Golden Globe Award for Best Original Song.

All tracks are written by Hans Zimmer

No.TitleLength
1."There You'll Be" (performed by Faith Hill)3:40
2."Tennessee"3:40
3."Brothers"4:04
4."...And Then I Kissed Him"5:37
5."I Will Come Back"2:54
6."Attack"8:56
7."December 7th"5:08
8."War"5:15
9."Heart of a Volunteer"7:05
Total length:46:21

Certifications

[edit]
Region Certification Certified units/sales
United Kingdom (BPI)[81] Silver 60,000^
United States (RIAA)[82] Gold 500,000^

^ Shipments figures based on certification alone.

See also

[edit]
  • Sangam, an earlier 1964 Indian film with a strikingly similar storyline, but with only one friend being a pilot in Sangam, whereas both are pilots in Pearl Harbor.[83][dubiousdiscuss]
  • Tora! Tora! Tora!, 1970 film about the Pearl Harbor attack.
  • The Chinese Widow, 2017 film about the story described in later half of movie Pearl Harbor in another viewpoint.

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "PEARL HARBOR (12)". British Board of Film Classification. May 17, 2001. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  2. ^ a b c d e "Pearl Harbor (2001)". Box Office Mojo. 2009. Retrieved March 25, 2009.
  3. ^ Cagle, Jess (May 27, 2001). "Pearl Harbor's Top Gun". Time. Archived from the original on April 11, 2005. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
  4. ^ a b Lyons, Charles (March 20, 2000). "Blockbuster or ball-buster?". Variety. p. 1.
  5. ^ Fennessey, Sean (June 27, 2011). "An Oral History of Transformers Director Michael Bay". GQ. Retrieved September 24, 2018.
  6. ^ Sunshine and Felix 2001, p. 135.
  7. ^ "Michael Fassbender's GQ Cover Story - November 2013". October 15, 2013.
  8. ^ Linder, Brian (February 11, 2000). "Theron Turns Down Pearl Harbor". IGN. Retrieved February 20, 2024.
  9. ^ Heines, vienne. "Bringing 'Pearl Harbor' to Corpus Christi." Military.com. Retrieved: January 10, 2014.
  10. ^ Flynn, Gillian (July 16, 2001). "Fact VS. Fiction". Time.
  11. ^ Head, Steve (June 26, 2000). "Pearl Harbor Preview on Access Hollywood". IGN. Retrieved October 26, 2024.
  12. ^ Dao, James (May 22, 2001). "Carrier Turns Theater for Premiere of 'Pearl Harbor'". The New York Times. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  13. ^ Ryan, Tim; Kakesako, Gregg K. (May 22, 2001). "All hands on deck for 'Pearl Harbor' premiere". Honolulu Star-Bulletin. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  14. ^ a b "'Pearl Harbor' Making Its Marks". Los Angeles Times. May 29, 2001.
  15. ^ "'Pearl Harbor' opens solidly, but won't break box office records". The Oshkosh Northwestern. May 28, 2001. p. 12. Archived from the original on September 4, 2023. Retrieved September 4, 2023 – via Newspapers.com. Open access icon
  16. ^ "Box Office: Harbor Wins Weekend, Loses War". ABC News.
  17. ^ Anthony D'Alessandro (March 28, 2016). "How 'Batman V Superman' Will Turn A Profit Despite Critical Kryptonite". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved March 29, 2016.
  18. ^ Linder, Brian (June 5, 2001). "Weekend Box Office: Harbor Withstands Shrek Attack". IGN. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
  19. ^ Linder, Brian (August 21, 2001). "Weekend Box Office: Pie in the Face for Race". IGN. Retrieved July 13, 2022.
  20. ^ Linder, Brian (June 12, 2001). "Weekend Box Office: Audiences Devour Swordfish". IGN. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
  21. ^ a b Groves, Don (July 23, 2001). "'Pearl Harbor' scores Japan hit". Variety. p. 13.
  22. ^ Groves, Don (June 5, 2001). "'Pearl Harbor' sets o'seas B.O. records". Variety. Archived from the original on September 8, 2023. Retrieved September 8, 2023.
  23. ^ Boland, Michael (August 20, 2001). "'Pearl' passes 'Mummy' overseas". Variety. p. 11. a record-shattering raid into China, where the pic garnered $3.9 million in six days
  24. ^ a b Groves, Don (June 18, 2001). "'Harbor' in B.O. battle for Europe". Variety. Archived from the original on August 28, 2024. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
  25. ^ "Romantic Drama Movies at the Box Office". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Archived from the original on January 25, 2019. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
  26. ^ a b "Multimedia Available: Pearl Harbor: Massive Week One Sales of 7 Million Units". Business Wire. Berkshire Hathaway. December 10, 2001. Archived from the original on January 24, 2002. Retrieved June 21, 2019 – via Yahoo.com.
  27. ^ Saccone, Melinda (December 7, 2001). "Rental Spending Down for Week Ended Dec. 3, But December Holds Gifts". hive4media.com. Archived from the original on December 23, 2001. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  28. ^ a b c Zad, Martie (December 2, 2001). "Remembering Pearl Harbor on DVD, video". The Washington Post. The Post-Standard. p. 143. Archived from the original on September 2, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024 – via Newspapers.com. Open access icon
  29. ^ "Pearl Harbor: 60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition". The Digital Bits.
  30. ^ a b Staten, Vince (June 29, 2002). "'Pearl Harbor': Enough Already". The Courier-Journal. p. 93. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved February 20, 2024 – via Newspapers.com. Open access icon
  31. ^ Beierle, Aaron. "Pearl Harbor: Vista Series (Director's Cut)". DVD Talk. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  32. ^ "Pearl Harbor: Vista Series". IGN. June 18, 2002. Archived from the original on September 28, 2022. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
  33. ^ "Phantom Menace dominates DVD awards in Los Angeles". Archived from the original on August 11, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
  34. ^ "Pearl Harbor (2001)". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
  35. ^ "Pearl Harbor Reviews, Ratings, Credits, and More at Metacritic" Metacritic. Retrieved: March 23, 2012.
  36. ^ Singer, Matt (August 13, 2015). "25 Movies With Completely Baffling CinemaScores". ScreenCrush.
  37. ^ Ebert, Roger. "'Pearl Harbor'." Chicago Sun-Times, May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009.
  38. ^ Ebert, Roger. "'Lawrence of Arabia'." Chicago Sun-Times, September 2, 2001. Retrieved: November 10, 2020.
  39. ^ Gonzalez, Ed (May 23, 2001). "Review: Pearl Harbor - Slant Magazine". Slant Magazine.com. Ed Gonzalez. Retrieved October 26, 2024.
  40. ^ Scott, A.O. "Pearl Harbor: War Is Hell, but Very Pretty." The New York Times, May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009.
  41. ^ Clark, Mike (June 7, 2001). "'Pearl Harbor' sputters — until Japanese show up". USA Today. Archived from the original on September 16, 2006. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
  42. ^ Howe, Desson. "Pearl Harbor: Bombs Away." Washington Post, May 26, 2001. Retrieved: June 29, 2009.
  43. ^ Travers, Peter (May 25, 2001). "Pearl Harbor". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on August 17, 2007. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
  44. ^ Schickel, Richard. "Mission: Inconsequential." Time, May 25, 2001. Retrieved: June 25, 2009. [dead link]
  45. ^ Butler, Robert W. (May 25, 2001). "And on this day, a bomb dropped". The Kansas City Star. p. 104. Retrieved October 26, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
  46. ^ Gleiberman, Owen (June 1, 2001). "'Jarhead'". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 11, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2023.
  47. ^ Sarris, Andrew (June 10, 2001). "Shrek and Dreck? Well, Not Quite". The New York Observer. Retrieved June 25, 2009.
  48. ^ Greene, Andy (September 25, 2023). "The 50 Worst Decisions in Movie History". Rolling Stone. Retrieved December 23, 2023. James Cameron had just obliterated all box office records by turning the Titanic disaster into a Leonardo DiCaprio-Kate Winslet romance. Bay himself just scored a huge hit taking the story of an asteroid nearly wiping out all life on Earth into a Ben Affleck-Liv Tyler love story, complete with an Aerosmith ballad that hit Number One. Why not smash the two movies together, sprinkle a smattering of actual history from World War II, and watch money start raining down from the sky?
  49. ^ Bergeson, Samantha (January 24, 2023). "From 'Blonde' to 'Joker,' Here's Every Film Nominated for Both an Oscar and a Razzie Award". IndieWire. simultaneously garnered four Oscar nominations, winning Best Sound Editing.
  50. ^ "The 74th Academy Awards (2002) Nominees and Winners". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. AMPAS. Archived from the original on November 9, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2011.
  51. ^ "The ASC Awards for Outstanding Achievement in Cinematography". Archived from the original on August 2, 2011.
  52. ^ "The BFCA Critics' Choice Awards :: 2001". Broadcast Film Critics Association. January 11, 2002. Archived from the original on January 7, 2013. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  53. ^ "Nominees/Winners". IMDb. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  54. ^ "DVD PREMIERE AWARDS 2002 NOMINATIONS & WINNERS". DVD Exclusive Awards. April 6, 2006. Archived from the original on January 14, 2005.
  55. ^ "Pearl Harbor – Golden Globes". HFPA. Retrieved July 5, 2021.
  56. ^ Green gets fingered for Razzies at BBC News
  57. ^ "Sandra Bullock wins 'worst actress' at the Razzies". The Daily Telegraph. March 7, 2010. Retrieved March 7, 2010.
  58. ^ "Sound editors tap noms for Golden Reel Awards". Variety. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
  59. ^ "GOLDEN SCHMOES WINNERS AND NOMINEES (2001)". JoBlo.com. Retrieved December 24, 2021.
  60. ^ "2001 Grammy Award Winners". Grammy.com. Retrieved May 1, 2011.
  61. ^ "Pop stars claim victories at MTV Movie Awards". CNN. Associated Press. June 2, 2002. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved September 2, 2015.
  62. ^ "6th Annual Film Awards (2001)". Online Film & Television Association. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
  63. ^ "PFCS Awards – 2002". IMDb. Retrieved December 18, 2021.
  64. ^ "International Press Academy website – 2002 6th Annual SATELLITE Awards". Archived from the original on February 13, 2008.
  65. ^ "Past Winners Database". The Envelope at LA Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2007. Retrieved September 18, 2019.
  66. ^ "'Teen Choice 2001". IMDb. Retrieved November 19, 2014.
  67. ^ "World Soundtrack Awards". World Soundtrack Awards. Retrieved December 18, 2021.
  68. ^ "2002 Taurus World Stunt Awards – Winners & Nominees". Taurus World Stunt Awards.[permanent dead link]
  69. ^ "Beyond the Movie: Pearl Harbor." Archived May 13, 2006, at the Wayback Machine National Geographic Society, 2001. Retrieved: March 26, 2009.
  70. ^ Barker, Chris. "10 Most Inaccurate Military Movies Ever Made". Retrieved December 16, 2018.
  71. ^ Wetta, Frank; Bay, Michael; Bruckheimer, Jerry; Wallace, Randall (2001). "Pearl Harbor". The Journal of Military History. 65 (4): 1138. doi:10.2307/2677684. JSTOR 2677684.
  72. ^ Suid, Lawrence. ""Pearl Harbor: Bombed Again"". Archived from the original on August 21, 2001. Retrieved June 21, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) Naval History (United States Naval institute), Vol. 15, No. 4, August 2001, p. 20.
  73. ^ Boggs, Carl (2006). "Pearl Harbor: How Film Conquers History". New Political Science. 28 (4): 451–466. doi:10.1080/07393140601005246. S2CID 145151000 – via EBSCOhost.
  74. ^ Padilla, Lyle F.; Castagnaro, Raymond J. (2009). "Medal of Honor Recipients/Nominees Portrayed On Film: Hollywood Abominations, Pearl Harbor (2001)". History, Legend and Myth: Hollywood and the Medal of Honor. Archived from the original on March 17, 2006. Retrieved March 26, 2009.
  75. ^ Sullivan, Patricia. "Kenneth Taylor; Flew Against Pearl Harbor Raiders." Washington Post, December 12, 2006. Retrieved: March 26, 2009.
  76. ^ White, Caroline. "The 10 most historically inaccurate movies". The Sunday Times. Archived from the original on June 15, 2011. Retrieved November 15, 2013.
  77. ^ LaSalle, Mick (May 29, 2001). "Hollywood vs. history / Historians say 'Pearl Harbor's' version of the World War II attack is off the mark". SFGate.
  78. ^ Gutthman, Edward. "'Pearl' - Hyped, yet promising / Movie to honor vets, nation's wartime spirit." MyUSA, December 7, 2000.
  79. ^ Heines, Vivienne. "Bringing 'Pearl Harbor' To Corpus Christi." military.com, August 1, 2000.
  80. ^ Parr, Freya (January 12, 2022). "Winners of Golden Globes for Best Original Score: all the winning and nominated soundtracks from history". Classical Music. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
  81. ^ "British album certifications – Original Soundtrack – Pearl Harbor". British Phonographic Industry. Retrieved November 24, 2022.
  82. ^ "American album certifications – Soundtrack – Pearl Harbor". Recording Industry Association of America. Retrieved October 31, 2022.
  83. ^ 10 Hollywood Movies That Were Inspired By Bollywood, Scoop Whoop, December 5, 2014

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Arroyo, Ernest. Pearl Harbor. New York: MetroBooks, 2001. ISBN 1-58663-285-X.
  • Barker, A.J. Pearl Harbor (Ballantine's Illustrated History of World War II, Battle Book, No. 10). New York: Ballantine Books, 1969. No ISBN.
  • Cohen, Stan. East Wind Rain: A Pictorial History of the Pearl Harbor Attack. Missoula, Montana: Pictorial Histories Publishing Company, 1981. ISBN 0-933126-15-8.
  • Craig, John S. (2004). Peculiar Liaisons: In War, Espionage, and Terrorism in the Twentieth Century. New York: Algora Publishing. ISBN 978-0-87586-331-3.
  • Golstein, Donald M., Katherine Dillon and J. Michael Wenger. The Way it Was: Pearl Harbor (The Original Photographs). Dulles, Virginia: Brassey's Inc., 1995. ISBN 1-57488-359-3.
  • Kimmel, Husband E. Kimmel's Story. Washington, D.C.: Henry Regnery Co., 1955.
  • Prange, Gordon W. At Dawn we Slept: The Untold Story of Pearl Harbor. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books, 1981. ISBN 0-14-006455-9.
  • Sheehan, Ed. Days of '41: Pearl Harbor Remembered. Honolulu: Kapa Associates, 1977. ISBN 0-915870-01-0.
  • Sunshine, Linda and Antonia Felix, eds. Pearl Harbor: The Movie and the Moment. New York: Hyperion, 2001. ISBN 0-7868-6780-9.
  • Sullivan, Robert. "What Really Happened." Time, June 4, 2001.
  • Thorpe. Briagdier General Elliott R. East Wind Rain: The Intimate Account of an Intelligence Officer in the Pacific, 1939–49. Boston: Gambit Incorporated, 1969. No ISBN.
  • Wilmott, H.P. with Tohmatsu Haruo and W. Spencer Johnson. Pearl Harbor. London: Cassell & Co., 2001. ISBN 978-0304358847.
  • Winchester, Jim, ed. Aircraft of World War II (The Aviation Factfile). London: Grange Books, 2004. ISBN 1-84013-639-1.
  • Wisiniewski, Richard A., ed. Pearl Harbor and the USS Arizona Memorial: A Pictorial History. Honolulu: Pacific Basin Enterprises, 1981, first edition 1977. No ISBN.
[edit]