Talk:Chelsea F.C.: Difference between revisions
→Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2023: new section |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Chelsea F.C./Archive 5) (bot |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Article history |
|||
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=Life|subpage=Sports|class=FA}} |
|||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
|action1=PR |
|action1=PR |
||
|action1date=21:51, 9 January 2007 |
|action1date=21:51, 9 January 2007 |
||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
|maindate=March 14, 2009 |
|maindate=March 14, 2009 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|1= |
||
{{Football |
{{WikiProject Football|importance=High|England=yes}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject England|importance=mid}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject London|importance=Mid}} |
||
⚫ | |||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Press |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{onlinesource |
|||
|section= |
|section= |
||
|author=Bob Reno |
|author=Bob Reno |
||
Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archives|search=yes}} |
{{archives|search=yes}} |
||
== 'Chelsea is no longer a London club? ' == |
|||
Why did someone remove '' Chelsea is an English football club based in Fulham, London, England? '' I really don't get it. Every other football club's city is mentioned. Why was it removed? |
|||
why [[Special:Contributions/81.199.168.46|81.199.168.46]] ([[User talk:81.199.168.46|talk]]) 13:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==Public profile== |
==Public profile== |
||
Line 58: | Line 51: | ||
On 29 November |
On 29 November 2017, Chelsea became implicated in the [[United Kingdom football sexual abuse scandal]] after announcing it was investigating allegations of historical sexual abuse in the 1970s.{{Cite news|last=Mendick|first=Robert|last2=Rumsby|first2=Ben|date=2016-11-30|title=Exclusive: Chelsea made secret payment to player in child sex abuse claim|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/11/29/chelsea-made-secret-payment-player-child-sex-abuse-claim/|access-date=2021-07-30|issn=0307-1235}}{{Cite web|date=2016-11-29|title=Chelsea open investigation into historical sex abuse allegations|url=http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/nov/29/chelsea-investigation|access-date=2021-07-30|website=The Guardian|language=en}}{{Cite web|last=Collomosse|first=James Olley, Tom|date=2016-12-02|title=Who is Eddie Heath? Sacked scout at centre of Chelsea hush money story|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/eddie-heath-the-former-chelsea-scout-who-spent-a-lot-of-time-in-his-office-decorating-and-cooking-meals-for-schoolboy-players-a3408566.html|access-date=2021-07-30|website=www.standard.co.uk|language=en}} Significant investigative allegations against the club claimed that a [[Hush money|secret payment]] was made to a former player who had accused the club's ex-chief scout Eddie Heath of child sexual abuse. On 2 December, [[Gary Johnson (footballer, born 1959)|Gary Johnson]] came forward, saying he was paid £50,000 not to go public with allegations he was sexually abused by Heath. The following day, Chelsea apologised "profusely" to Johnson, who later demanded further financial compensation from the club. On 3 December, ''[[The Independent]]'' reported a Chelsea youth player's allegation that [[Dario Gradi]], then Chelsea's assistant manager, visited the player's family's home to "smooth over" a complaint of sexual assault against Heath in 1974. Gradi was suspended by the FA on 11 December 2016 in relation to these allegations. In August 2019, Chelsea's board apologised "unreservedly" for the mistake of allowing Heath, a "prolific and manipulative sexual abuser", to operate "unchallenged".{{Cite web|title=Chelsea statement {{!}} Official Site {{!}} Chelsea Football Club|url=https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/2019/08/06/chelsea-statement|access-date=2021-07-30|website=ChelseaFC}} The apology followed an inquiry led by barrister Charles Geekie QC which heard evidence from 23 witnesses, with 15 reporting "serious and unambiguous sexual assaults", including rape.{{Cite news|title=Chelsea racism case a fight for ‘justice and equality’|language=en-GB|work=BBC Sport|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53180306|access-date=2021-07-30}} In May 2018, the ''Guardian'' reported Chelsea had begun paying settlements to victims of sexual abuse at the club.{{Cite web|date=2018-05-17|title=Chelsea issue secret payout to alleged sexual abuse victim of former scout|url=http://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/17/chelsea-payout-sexual-abuse-victim|access-date=2021-07-30|website=The Guardian|language=en}} Legal experts have predicted the total cost of compensation for abuse victims across the UK could reach more than £100m. It is not currently known how much total compensation Chelsea has paid themselves. |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on |
== Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2024 == |
||
{{edit semi-protected|Chelsea F.C.|answered=yes}} |
{{edit semi-protected|Chelsea F.C.|answered=yes}} |
||
[[Special:Contributions/5.200.114.174|5.200.114.174]] ([[User talk:5.200.114.174|talk]]) 06:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hi the socks for second kit should be blue |
|||
:[[File:Pictogram voting wait.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Already done'''<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color:#007FFF">Kpg</span>]][[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color:#00FF7F">jhp</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color:#FFDB00">jm </span>]] 08:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | :[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Charliehdb|Charliehdb]] ([[User talk:Charliehdb|talk]]) 12:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Title page == |
|||
⚫ | |||
Can we change the title of the page to Chelsea Men’s F.C as otherwise it’s just confusing [[User:Apeden56182|Apeden56182]] ([[User talk:Apeden56182|talk]]) 19:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
Frank lampard is no longer Chelsea's manager [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:1410:366F:3986:151C:303A:3388|2A00:23EE:1410:366F:3986:151C:303A:3388]] ([[User talk:2A00:23EE:1410:366F:3986:151C:303A:3388|talk]]) 20:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | :[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> |
||
:@[[User:Apeden56182|Apeden56182]] While we might long for a world where the men's and women's clubs are on equal footing, we aren't there yet, so it's reasonable that the primary topic sought by somebody looking for Chelsea F.C. is the men's club. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 19:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 20 September 2023 == |
|||
::Differentiating doesn’t make the title wrong, though. It makes it more accurate and therefore, more useful to anyone searching, wouldn’t you agree? Editors have a responsibility to use language in line with the times and I believe that here, we can make that progress. [[User:Apeden56182|Apeden56182]] ([[User talk:Apeden56182|talk]]) 19:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Apeden56182|Apeden56182]] Except that it's not more accurate, because the name of the club is "Chelsea Football Club", not "Chelsea Men's Football Club". By contrast, the name of the women's club is "[[Chelsea F.C. Women|Chelsea Football Club Women]]". |
|||
:::'''If''' both clubs were just named "Chelsea Football Club", then we would need to call the article on the women's club "Chelsea Football Club (women)", but as long as the men's club remained the primary search topic, it could stay at "Chelsea Football Club" and not need moved to "Chelsea Football Club (men)". See [[Everton F.C.]] and [[Everton F.C. (women)]] for an example of how that is handled and note that [[Everton F.C. (men)]] does not even exist (yet). Also note that [[Everton F.C.]] refers to the English club, while [[Everton F.C. (Trinidad and Tobago)]] has a disambiguated title. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 20:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Chelsea F.C.|answered=no}} |
|||
Change "Four other players made more than 500 appearances for the club: Peter Bonetti (729; 1959–79), John Terry (717; 1998–2017), Frank Lampard (648; 2001–2014) and John Hollins (592; 1963–1975 and 1983–1984)." to "Five other players made more than 500 appearances for the club: Peter Bonetti (729; 1959–79), John Terry (717; 1998–2017), Frank Lampard (648; 2001–2014), John Hollins (592; 1963–1975 and 1983–1984) and César Azpilicueta (508; 2012-2023). [[User:Zrandrew|Zrandrew]] ([[User talk:Zrandrew|talk]]) 16:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
Grammar error under the subheading 'BlueCo Ownership (2022-Present)'. The final sentence should contain the word "matches" instead of "match's" [[User:Nevadevo|Nevadevo]] ([[User talk:Nevadevo|talk]]) 03:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:LizardJr8|LizardJr8]] ([[User talk:LizardJr8|talk]]) 04:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:25, 11 December 2024
Chelsea F.C. is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 14, 2009. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Public profile
[edit]Historic child sexual abuse scandal (2016)
[edit]On 29 November 2017, Chelsea became implicated in the United Kingdom football sexual abuse scandal after announcing it was investigating allegations of historical sexual abuse in the 1970s.Mendick, Robert; Rumsby, Ben (2016-11-30). "Exclusive: Chelsea made secret payment to player in child sex abuse claim". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2021-07-30."Chelsea open investigation into historical sex abuse allegations". The Guardian. 2016-11-29. Retrieved 2021-07-30.Collomosse, James Olley, Tom (2016-12-02). "Who is Eddie Heath? Sacked scout at centre of Chelsea hush money story". www.standard.co.uk. Retrieved 2021-07-30.{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Significant investigative allegations against the club claimed that a secret payment was made to a former player who had accused the club's ex-chief scout Eddie Heath of child sexual abuse. On 2 December, Gary Johnson came forward, saying he was paid £50,000 not to go public with allegations he was sexually abused by Heath. The following day, Chelsea apologised "profusely" to Johnson, who later demanded further financial compensation from the club. On 3 December, The Independent reported a Chelsea youth player's allegation that Dario Gradi, then Chelsea's assistant manager, visited the player's family's home to "smooth over" a complaint of sexual assault against Heath in 1974. Gradi was suspended by the FA on 11 December 2016 in relation to these allegations. In August 2019, Chelsea's board apologised "unreservedly" for the mistake of allowing Heath, a "prolific and manipulative sexual abuser", to operate "unchallenged"."Chelsea statement | Official Site | Chelsea Football Club". ChelseaFC. Retrieved 2021-07-30. The apology followed an inquiry led by barrister Charles Geekie QC which heard evidence from 23 witnesses, with 15 reporting "serious and unambiguous sexual assaults", including rape."Chelsea racism case a fight for 'justice and equality'". BBC Sport. Retrieved 2021-07-30. In May 2018, the Guardian reported Chelsea had begun paying settlements to victims of sexual abuse at the club."Chelsea issue secret payout to alleged sexual abuse victim of former scout". The Guardian. 2018-05-17. Retrieved 2021-07-30. Legal experts have predicted the total cost of compensation for abuse victims across the UK could reach more than £100m. It is not currently known how much total compensation Chelsea has paid themselves.
Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
5.200.114.174 (talk) 06:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC) Hi the socks for second kit should be blue
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 12:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Title page
[edit]Can we change the title of the page to Chelsea Men’s F.C as otherwise it’s just confusing Apeden56182 (talk) 19:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Apeden56182 While we might long for a world where the men's and women's clubs are on equal footing, we aren't there yet, so it's reasonable that the primary topic sought by somebody looking for Chelsea F.C. is the men's club. —C.Fred (talk) 19:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Differentiating doesn’t make the title wrong, though. It makes it more accurate and therefore, more useful to anyone searching, wouldn’t you agree? Editors have a responsibility to use language in line with the times and I believe that here, we can make that progress. Apeden56182 (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Apeden56182 Except that it's not more accurate, because the name of the club is "Chelsea Football Club", not "Chelsea Men's Football Club". By contrast, the name of the women's club is "Chelsea Football Club Women".
- If both clubs were just named "Chelsea Football Club", then we would need to call the article on the women's club "Chelsea Football Club (women)", but as long as the men's club remained the primary search topic, it could stay at "Chelsea Football Club" and not need moved to "Chelsea Football Club (men)". See Everton F.C. and Everton F.C. (women) for an example of how that is handled and note that Everton F.C. (men) does not even exist (yet). Also note that Everton F.C. refers to the English club, while Everton F.C. (Trinidad and Tobago) has a disambiguated title. —C.Fred (talk) 20:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Differentiating doesn’t make the title wrong, though. It makes it more accurate and therefore, more useful to anyone searching, wouldn’t you agree? Editors have a responsibility to use language in line with the times and I believe that here, we can make that progress. Apeden56182 (talk) 19:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Grammar error under the subheading 'BlueCo Ownership (2022-Present)'. The final sentence should contain the word "matches" instead of "match's" Nevadevo (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class football articles
- High-importance football articles
- FA-Class football in England articles
- High-importance football in England articles
- Football in England task force articles
- WikiProject Football articles
- FA-Class England-related articles
- Mid-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- FA-Class London-related articles
- Mid-importance London-related articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press