Jump to content

Talk:Twin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Life|class=B}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Biology|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Biology|class =B|importance =mid}}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|importance =mid|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Family and relationships}}
{{WikiProject Family and relationships|class=|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Genealogy|importance =mid}}
}}
}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 125K
|maxarchivesize = 125K
Line 13: Line 14:
|archive = Talk:Twin/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Twin/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{Educational assignment|date=2022-05-20|link=Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Goucher College/BIO 378 Developmental Biology (SP22)}}


== Quaternary mention? ==
== Quaternary mention? ==


I not only didn't see any mention of non-communal "quaternary marriages" mentioned in this article, I couldn't find a single mention anywhere on wikipedia. Could quaternary marriages be mentioned or even have its own article? I learned about it earlier today in the letter section of Popular Science and this was basically the only worthwhile web reference I could find outside of discussion about group marriages: [http://www.bu.edu/alumni/bostonia/2005/fall/double/index.html]
I not only didn't see any mention of non-communal "quaternary marriages" mentioned in this article, I couldn't find a single mention anywhere on wikipedia. Could quaternary marriages be mentioned or even have its own article? I learned about it earlier today in the letter section of Popular Science and this was basically the only worthwhile web reference I could find outside of discussion about group marriages: [http://www.bu.edu/alumni/bostonia/2005/fall/double/index.html] <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/4.254.115.130|4.254.115.130]] ([[User talk:4.254.115.130#top|talk]]) 03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)</small>


== Citation 19 is a dead link ==
== Citation 19 is a dead link ==
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.9.109.234|82.9.109.234]] ([[User talk:82.9.109.234#top|talk]]) 16:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)</small>
:{{done}} I have {{diff|Twin|prev|1248321584|flagged}} the URL with {{para|url-status|usurped}}. <span title="Signature of Dan Leonard">— <span style="text-shadow: 2px 2px 8px lightskyblue, -2px -2px 8px forestgreen;font-weight:bold;">[[User:Dan Leonard|Dan Leonard]]</span> ([[User talk:Dan Leonard|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Leonard|contribs]])</span> 21:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: BIO 378 Developmental Biology==
== Change to this? ==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Goucher_College/BIO_378_Developmental_Biology_(SP22) | assignments = [[User:Uketbriana|Uketbriana]] | start_date = 2022-01-31 | end_date = 2022-05-20 }} <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Uketbriana|Uketbriana]] ([[User talk:Uketbriana#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Uketbriana|contribs]]) 03:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)</small>

Fraternal twins can be any of the following:

Female–female: Sometimes called sororal twins (25%).
Male–male twins: Rarely called leviral twins (25%).
Male–female twins: This is the most common pairing (50%), simply by virtue of it encompassing both "male-female" (25%) and "female-male" (25%) twins.

I'm sorry I had to coin a term but I put it on the talk page to compensate. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LukeyBear11|LukeyBear11]] ([[User talk:LukeyBear11#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LukeyBear11|contribs]]) 03:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Photo: Fraternal twins ==

Changed photo - the [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Being_a_twin_means_you_always_have_a_pillow_or_blanket_handy.jpg previous one] is a cute photo, but the babies look as much identical as fraternal (please don't tell me they must be different genders due to the colours of the clothes).[[User:Davidships|Davidships]] ([[User talk:Davidships|talk]]) 18:26, 16 February 2020 (UTC)


== Suggestion for improvement ==
== Types and Zygosity section ==


I removed table added in 2016 by Gatorgirl7563. It contained no information not already found in article. Tables should help the reader correlate related facts, however out of 77 cells, 66 were "X" (which was not defined). 2 columns were completely "X", so served no purpose. I am assuming that Gatorgirl7563 thought that it would be expanded and clarified by other editors over time, but at only 14% filled in, took up a lot of space without adding clarification to the article. There were previous discussions on talk page to remove or improve.
This article is sorely lacking in content post-birth of twins. [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Entwined_Lives/MpaxQgAACAAJ?hl=en Here is an entire book on the subject]. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] ([[User talk:Calliopejen1|talk]]) 08:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
If someone wanted to create a comprehensive table that correlates all aspects of the different types of twinning, I would support that, but it should add information to the article by showing how their attributes compare and contrast. <span style="border-radius:9em;background:#88ff00">[[User:Bobsd|<span style="color: blue">&nbsp;• Bobsd •&nbsp;</span>]] </span>([[User talk:Bobsd|talk]]) 17:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)


== Neshebra Danielle Wright ==
== When cousins are two of a kind ==


Macula pinna [[Special:Contributions/2600:1005:B194:EB8F:18A9:2FF:2551:BABC|2600:1005:B194:EB8F:18A9:2FF:2551:BABC]] ([[User talk:2600:1005:B194:EB8F:18A9:2FF:2551:BABC|talk]]) 16:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
No mention of identical first cousins (dispersed between continents)? They laugh alike; they walk alike; at times they even talk alike. [[User:TheScotch|TheScotch]] ([[User talk:TheScotch|talk]]) 15:07, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:32, 11 December 2024

Quaternary mention?

[edit]

I not only didn't see any mention of non-communal "quaternary marriages" mentioned in this article, I couldn't find a single mention anywhere on wikipedia. Could quaternary marriages be mentioned or even have its own article? I learned about it earlier today in the letter section of Popular Science and this was basically the only worthwhile web reference I could find outside of discussion about group marriages: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.115.130 (talk) 03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.109.234 (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I have flagged the URL with |url-status=usurped. — Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 21:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: BIO 378 Developmental Biology

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2022 and 20 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Uketbriana (article contribs). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uketbriana (talkcontribs) 03:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Types and Zygosity section

[edit]

I removed table added in 2016 by Gatorgirl7563. It contained no information not already found in article. Tables should help the reader correlate related facts, however out of 77 cells, 66 were "X" (which was not defined). 2 columns were completely "X", so served no purpose. I am assuming that Gatorgirl7563 thought that it would be expanded and clarified by other editors over time, but at only 14% filled in, took up a lot of space without adding clarification to the article. There were previous discussions on talk page to remove or improve. If someone wanted to create a comprehensive table that correlates all aspects of the different types of twinning, I would support that, but it should add information to the article by showing how their attributes compare and contrast.  • Bobsd •  (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neshebra Danielle Wright

[edit]

Macula pinna 2600:1005:B194:EB8F:18A9:2FF:2551:BABC (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]