User talk:Dyolf87: Difference between revisions
Notification that File:Floydthunder2020.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 |
→I have sent you a note about a page you started: new section |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== File:Wet Dream 2023 album cover.png listed for discussion == |
|||
==Edit comments== |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]] A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Wet Dream 2023 album cover.png]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 October 19#File:Wet Dream 2023 album cover.png|'''discussion''']] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 17:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == |
|||
Hi, I saw you made a series of edits to [[Cirth]]. However, you omitted to explain any of them with edit comments. Even a brief remark like "rm stray punctuation" would be helpful to other editors, and is a common practice here. It'd be much appreciated if you could comment your edits in future. Many thanks, [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 18:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: It's a mistake I keep making! I keep forgetting to add comments, but I'm getting better. — [[User:Dyolf87|Dyolf87]] ([[User talk:Dyolf87#top|talk]]) 00:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
== Sources and formatting == |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Please see [[WP:RS]] and [[MOS:SMALL]]. Please let me know if you have any questions. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 07:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:Look, in the interests of not having an edit war (and strictly speaking, we made ''four'' reverts--which were two reverts each), can we please discuss your concerns on the talk page of the article? I don't see any value in going back and forth like this. Have you read [[WP:RS]] or [[MOS:SMALL]]? I think that would be a good start. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 08:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
::I also self-reverted just now to reinclude your suggested source and posted to a noticeboard. Let's collaborate to make the encyclopedia better: sound good? ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 08:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== "Vandalism" == |
|||
</div> |
|||
First, please refrain from calling good-faith edits you disagree with "vandalism". That's not going to win you any arguments. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1187132262 --> |
|||
== June 2024 == |
|||
Second, based on your reverts at [[Nick Mason's Saucerful of Secrets]] and [[The Early Years 1965–1972]], you don't seem to understand that everything in Wikipedia must be cited to a reliable source. Please read [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:V]]. That is why I removed large portions of the Saucerful article. [[User:Popcornfud|Popcornfud]] ([[User talk:Popcornfud|talk]]) 10:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]]. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, [[:Eggcorn]], but you didn't provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|include a citation]] and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at [[Help:Referencing for beginners|referencing for beginners]]. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:MichaelMaggs|my talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> [[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 07:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== |
== On the Use of "'s" == |
||
I currently stand by my reverting of your change, but swaying my opinion might be possible. :-) |
|||
> 1. this isn't pluralisation but a genitive; |
|||
It seems like you are still [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Fat_Old_Sun&type=revision&diff=980792080&oldid=965572681 adding information without a source]. Why are you doing this? Have you seen [[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], and [[WP:OR]]? I'm confused here. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 05:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC) |
|||
==Non-free rationale for File:Floydthunder2020.jpg== |
|||
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
Thanks for uploading or contributing to '''[[:File:Floydthunder2020.jpg]]'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under [[WP:NFCC|non-free content criteria]], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to [[:File:Floydthunder2020.jpg|the file description page]], and edit it to include a [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|non-free rationale]]. |
|||
You are correct. I used the wrong word despite referencing a material which actually used the correct word. |
|||
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/Dyolf87|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F6|section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request for undeletion]] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> — [[User:JJMC89|JJMC89]] <small>([[User talk:JJMC89|T]]'''·'''[[Special:Contributions/JJMC89|C]])</small> 02:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Floydthunder2020.jpg== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Floydthunder2020.jpg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
> 2. common nouns ending in -s take a genitive in -s', proper nouns take -s's; |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 17:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
What style guides are you using? I referenced [https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/apostrophe_introduction.html Purdue OWL] when I reverted your change. |
|||
> 3. nouns in -s form plurals in -es. |
|||
You are correct. |
|||
-[[User:Andrewchawk|Andrewchawk]] ([[User talk:Andrewchawk|talk]]) 18:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Have you seen [[English possessive]]? Also, why would you default to an obscure American university style guide instead of the standard English usage? – [[User:Dyolf87|Dyolf87]] ([[User talk:Dyolf87#top|talk]]) 09:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::> Have you seen [[English possessive]]? |
|||
::I have. As of the twenty-eighth day of July of 2024, the article contains the following sentence: Singular nouns ending in ''s'' also form a possessive regularly by adding ''{{`}}s'', as in ''Charles's'' {{IPAc-en|ˈ|tʃ|ɑːr|l|z|ᵻ|z}} or ''boss's''. |
|||
::> Also, why would you default to an obscure American university style guide [...] |
|||
::In my experience as an opinionated grammarian, Purdue OWL has been a pretty good resource and tends to highlight differences and similarities between popular style guides. I was actually going to mention that the APA style guide offers a similar recommendation for possessives for singular nouns which end in "s", but Purdue OWL already mentioned this fact. |
|||
::> [...] instead of the standard English usage? |
|||
::What is the standard English usage? What is standard English, anyway? [[User:Andrewchawk|Andrewchawk]] ([[User talk:Andrewchawk|talk]]) 02:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Also, I just encountered [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Possessives|Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Possessives]] and was reminded of this exchange. [[User:Andrewchawk|Andrewchawk]] ([[User talk:Andrewchawk|talk]]) 10:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Tour dates in [[About Face (album)]] article == |
|||
Please stop adding in tour dates into the article, as that need to be in its own article, not in an article about a studio album. It is considered undue weight per [[WP:UNDUE]], as well to note that filling it in would be [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]]. In regards to the tour, it is supported by a single source, which is not enough to make that section in particular notable, see [[WP:NTOUR]]. [[User:HorrorLover555|HorrorLover555]] ([[User talk:HorrorLover555|talk]]) 13:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 4 == |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[...And Then There Were Three... Tour]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Kiel Opera House]]. |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 19:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== November 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add or change content, as you did at [[:Duke Tour]], without citing a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]]. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> [[User:I dream of horses|I dream of horses]] [[Special:Contribs/I dream of horses|(Hoofprints)]] [[User talk:I dream of horses|(Neigh at me)]] 19:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
</div> |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1258243594 --> |
|||
== December 2024 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Dyolf87|your recent contributions]], such as the edit(s) you made to [[:Ahsoka (TV series)]], did not appear to be constructive and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]]. You can find information about these at our [[Help:Getting started|welcome page]] which also provides further information about [[Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia|contributing constructively to this encyclopedia]]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use [[User:Dyolf87/sandbox|your sandbox]] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on [[User_talk:Adamstom.97|my talk page]]. ''You are edit warring and being disruptive. You boldly removed details from the article that are supported by the source and standard additions. No reasoning was given for the removal other than you disliking how the text is written. Stop edit warring, restore the article, and take your concerns to the talk page.''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> [[User:Adamstom.97|adamstom97]] ([[User talk:Adamstom.97|talk]]) 11:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Ahsoka (TV series)]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <b>[[User:Jauerback|Jauerback]]</b><sup>[[User talk:Jauerback|dude?]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jauerback|dude.]]</sub> 13:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== I have sent you a note about a page you started == |
|||
Hi Dyolf87. Thank you for your work on [[Luck and Strange tour]]. Another editor, [[User:North8000|North8000]], has reviewed it as part of [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new pages patrol]] and left the following comment: |
|||
{{Bq|1=Nice work}} |
|||
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>North8000<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF --> |
|||
<b style="color: #0000cc;">''North8000''</b> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 17:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:34, 12 December 2024
File:Wet Dream 2023 album cover.png listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wet Dream 2023 album cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eggcorn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
On the Use of "'s"
[edit]I currently stand by my reverting of your change, but swaying my opinion might be possible. :-)
> 1. this isn't pluralisation but a genitive;
You are correct. I used the wrong word despite referencing a material which actually used the correct word.
> 2. common nouns ending in -s take a genitive in -s', proper nouns take -s's;
What style guides are you using? I referenced Purdue OWL when I reverted your change.
> 3. nouns in -s form plurals in -es.
You are correct.
-Andrewchawk (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Have you seen English possessive? Also, why would you default to an obscure American university style guide instead of the standard English usage? – Dyolf87 (talk) 09:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
- > Have you seen English possessive?
- I have. As of the twenty-eighth day of July of 2024, the article contains the following sentence: Singular nouns ending in s also form a possessive regularly by adding 's, as in Charles's /ˈtʃɑːrlzɪz/ or boss's.
- > Also, why would you default to an obscure American university style guide [...]
- In my experience as an opinionated grammarian, Purdue OWL has been a pretty good resource and tends to highlight differences and similarities between popular style guides. I was actually going to mention that the APA style guide offers a similar recommendation for possessives for singular nouns which end in "s", but Purdue OWL already mentioned this fact.
- > [...] instead of the standard English usage?
- What is the standard English usage? What is standard English, anyway? Andrewchawk (talk) 02:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also, I just encountered Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Possessives and was reminded of this exchange. Andrewchawk (talk) 10:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Tour dates in About Face (album) article
[edit]Please stop adding in tour dates into the article, as that need to be in its own article, not in an article about a studio album. It is considered undue weight per WP:UNDUE, as well to note that filling it in would be WP:INDISCRIMINATE. In regards to the tour, it is supported by a single source, which is not enough to make that section in particular notable, see WP:NTOUR. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ...And Then There Were Three... Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiel Opera House.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Duke Tour, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 19:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ahsoka (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are edit warring and being disruptive. You boldly removed details from the article that are supported by the source and standard additions. No reasoning was given for the removal other than you disliking how the text is written. Stop edit warring, restore the article, and take your concerns to the talk page. adamstom97 (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ahsoka (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Dyolf87. Thank you for your work on Luck and Strange tour. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)