Jump to content

Agnostic theism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Views of agnostic theism: Added more wikilinks, fixed grammar and punctuation, neutral wording.
Undid revision 1262712432 by 67.206.173.34 (talk)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{more citations needed|date=June 2024}}
{{Short description|Philosophical view combining theism with agnosticism}}
{{cite check|date=June 2024}}{{Short description|Philosophical view combining theism with agnosticism}}
{{Atheism and Irreligion Sidebar}}
'''Agnostic theism''', '''agnostotheism''', or '''agnostitheism''' is the [[philosophical]] view that encompasses both [[theism]] and [[agnosticism]]. An agnostic theist believes in the existence of one or more gods, but regards the basis of this proposition as ''unknown or inherently unknowable''. The agnostic theist may also or alternatively be agnostic regarding the properties of the god or gods that they believe in.
'''Agnostic theism''' is the [[philosophical]] view that encompasses both [[theism]] and [[agnosticism]]. An agnostic theist believes in the existence of one or more gods, but regards the basis of this proposition as ''unknown or inherently unknowable''. The agnostic theist may also or alternatively be agnostic regarding the properties of the god or gods that they believe in.


==Views of agnostic theism==
==Views of agnostic theism==
[[File:Classical definition of Kno.svg|thumb|right|Agnostic theism is belief but without knowledge, as shown in purple and blue (''see'':[[Epistemology]]).]]
[[File:Classical definition of Kno.svg|thumb|right|Agnostic theism is belief but without knowledge, as shown in purple and blue (''see'': [[Epistemology]]).]]


There are numerous [[belief]]s that can be included in agnostic theism, such as [[fideism]], the doctrine that knowledge depends on faith or revelation; not all agnostic theists are fideists. Since agnosticism is in the philosophical rather than religious sense an [[Epistemology|epistemological position]] on [[knowledge]] regarding the divine and does not forbid belief in the existence of one or more deities, it is considered to be compatible with both [[Atheism|atheistic]] and theistic positions.<ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Benn |author-first=Piers |date=December 1999 |title=Some Uncertainties about Agnosticism |editor-last=Hall |editor-first=Ronald L. |journal=International Journal for Philosophy of Religion |location=[[Berlin]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |volume=46 |issue=3 |pages=171–188 |doi=10.1023/A:1003792325966 |issn=1572-8684 |jstor=40012768}}</ref>
There are numerous [[belief]]s that can be included in agnostic theism, such as [[fideism]], the doctrine that knowledge depends on faith or revelation; not all agnostic theists are fideists. Since agnosticism is in the philosophical rather than religious sense an [[Epistemology|epistemological position]] on [[knowledge]] regarding the divine and does not forbid belief in the existence of one or more deities, it is considered to be compatible with both [[Atheism|atheistic]] and theistic positions.<ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Benn |author-first=Piers |date=December 1999 |title=Some Uncertainties about Agnosticism |editor-last=Hall |editor-first=Ronald L. |journal=International Journal for Philosophy of Religion |location=[[Berlin]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |volume=46 |issue=3 |pages=171–188 |doi=10.1023/A:1003792325966 |issn=1572-8684 |jstor=40012768|s2cid=169901708 }}</ref>


The classical [[Epistemology|philosophical understanding of knowledge]] is that [[knowledge]] is [[justified true belief]]. The founder of [[logotherapy]], [[Viktor Frankl]], may have well exemplified this definition. Seidner expands upon this example and stresses Frankl's characterization of ''unconscious''.<ref>Seidner, Stanley S. (June 10, 2009) [https://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:FrKYAo88ckkJ:www.materdei.ie/media/conferences/a-secular-age-parallel-sessions-timetable.pdf+%22Stan+Seidner%22&hl=en&gl=us "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501081407/http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3AFrKYAo88ckkJ%3Awww.materdei.ie%2Fmedia%2Fconferences%2Fa-secular-age-parallel-sessions-timetable.pdf+%22Stan+Seidner%22&hl=en&gl=us |date=2011-05-01 }}. ''Mater Dei Institute''.</ref> Agnostic theism could be interpreted as an admission that it is not possible to justify one's belief in a god sufficiently for it to be considered known. This may be because they consider [[faith]] a requirement of their religion, or because of the influence of plausible-seeming scientific or philosophical criticism.
The classical [[Epistemology|philosophical understanding of knowledge]] is that [[knowledge]] is [[justified true belief]]. The founder of [[logotherapy]], [[Viktor Frankl]], may have well exemplified this definition. Seidner expands upon this example and stresses Frankl's characterization of ''unconscious''.<ref>Seidner, Stanley S. (June 10, 2009) [https://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:FrKYAo88ckkJ:www.materdei.ie/media/conferences/a-secular-age-parallel-sessions-timetable.pdf+%22Stan+Seidner%22&hl=en&gl=us "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110501081407/http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache%3AFrKYAo88ckkJ%3Awww.materdei.ie%2Fmedia%2Fconferences%2Fa-secular-age-parallel-sessions-timetable.pdf+%22Stan+Seidner%22&hl=en&gl=us |date=2011-05-01 }}. ''Mater Dei Institute''.</ref> Agnostic theism could be interpreted as an admission that it is not possible to justify one's belief in a god sufficiently for it to be considered known. This may be because they consider [[faith]] a requirement of their religion, or because of the influence of plausible-seeming scientific or philosophical criticism.
Line 37: Line 37:


==External links==
==External links==
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/ Epistemology] - from [http://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
*[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/ Epistemology] - from [https://plato.stanford.edu/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
*[http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=DicHist/uvaBook/tei/DicHist1.xml;chunk.id=dv1-03;toc.depth=1;toc.id=dv1-03;brand=default AGNOSTICISM] - from [http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/DicHist/dict.html Dictionary of the History of Ideas]
*[https://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=DicHist/uvaBook/tei/DicHist1.xml;chunk.id=dv1-03;toc.depth=1;toc.id=dv1-03;brand=default AGNOSTICISM] - from [https://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=DicHist/uvaBook/tei/DicHist1.xml;brand=default; Dictionary of the History of Ideas]


{{Agnosticism}}
{{Agnosticism}}

Latest revision as of 02:50, 13 December 2024

Agnostic theism is the philosophical view that encompasses both theism and agnosticism. An agnostic theist believes in the existence of one or more gods, but regards the basis of this proposition as unknown or inherently unknowable. The agnostic theist may also or alternatively be agnostic regarding the properties of the god or gods that they believe in.

Views of agnostic theism

[edit]
Agnostic theism is belief but without knowledge, as shown in purple and blue (see: Epistemology).

There are numerous beliefs that can be included in agnostic theism, such as fideism, the doctrine that knowledge depends on faith or revelation; not all agnostic theists are fideists. Since agnosticism is in the philosophical rather than religious sense an epistemological position on knowledge regarding the divine and does not forbid belief in the existence of one or more deities, it is considered to be compatible with both atheistic and theistic positions.[1]

The classical philosophical understanding of knowledge is that knowledge is justified true belief. The founder of logotherapy, Viktor Frankl, may have well exemplified this definition. Seidner expands upon this example and stresses Frankl's characterization of unconscious.[2] Agnostic theism could be interpreted as an admission that it is not possible to justify one's belief in a god sufficiently for it to be considered known. This may be because they consider faith a requirement of their religion, or because of the influence of plausible-seeming scientific or philosophical criticism.

Christian agnostics practice a distinct form of agnosticism that applies only to the attributes of the Christian god. They hold that it is difficult or impossible to be sure of anything beyond the basic tenets of the Christian faith. They believe that the Christian god exists, that Jesus has a special relationship with him and is in some way divine, and that God might perhaps be worshipped. This belief system has deep roots in Judaism and the early days of the Christian Church.[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Benn, Piers (December 1999). Hall, Ronald L. (ed.). "Some Uncertainties about Agnosticism". International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 46 (3). Berlin and New York: Springer Verlag: 171–188. doi:10.1023/A:1003792325966. ISSN 1572-8684. JSTOR 40012768. S2CID 169901708.
  2. ^ Seidner, Stanley S. (June 10, 2009) "A Trojan Horse: Logotherapeutic Transcendence and its Secular Implications for Theology" Archived 2011-05-01 at the Wayback Machine. Mater Dei Institute.
  3. ^ Weatherhead, Leslie (1972). The Christian Agnostic. Abingdon Press. ISBN 978-0-687-06977-4.
[edit]