Jump to content

Talk:One Piece: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1222585821 by 88.24.181.174 (talk)
m Reverted 1 edit by Joyfuljake (talk) to last revision by Vsmith
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=28|archive_units=hours|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{ArticleHistory
{{ArticleHistory


Line 47: Line 47:
{{annual readership}}
{{annual readership}}


== no one is talking about the tcg ==
== inspired by the wizard of oz? ==


"He was also inspired by ''The Wizard of Oz'', claiming not to endure stories where the reward of adventure is the adventure itself, opting for a story where travel is important, but even more important is the goal.[5]"
I believe its a very important part of one piece although relatively new [[Special:Contributions/79.107.0.246|79.107.0.246]] ([[User talk:79.107.0.246|talk]]) 17:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)


Source says "Akashiya also asked Oda about the goal of the main characters in the story, the titular "One Piece" treasure. Akashiya asked if the treasure was "family bonds," and Oda replied, "No, I hate that kind of thing." Oda elaborated, saying, "That's like the ending of ''The Wizard of Oz'', which I watched when I was a kid. Adventuring that long, and having the adventure itself be the treasure, is really dissatisfying. Those kinds of stories are impossible. It feels like, 'I've gone on this long adventure, so give me the treasure!'""
== One Piece Stealth Marketing Incident ==


I'm not sure this counts as 'being inspired by', even if we included being inspired to do the opposite out of spite---it seems more like Oda brought up the Wizard of Oz as an example because of the interviewer's question. He certainly does not clearly state that he was inspired to make the treasure at the end of the journey more important than the journey itself '''''because of''''' ''The Wizard of Oz'' or as a result of his childhood frustration with it. (The article right now also seems a bit misleading about the story of ''The Wizard of Oz'', lol.)
This was a big deal in japan back in 2020. Why is it not added here?


Not sure if I think this can be edited into something relevant, informative, and correct; or if it should be completely removed from the article. Suggestions? [[User:Butter no parsnips|Butter no parsnips]] ([[User talk:Butter no parsnips|talk]]) 04:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
https://www.shonenjump.com/j/2020/03/27/200327_oshirase001.html

https://nlab.itmedia.co.jp/nl/articles/2003/27/news119.html [[User:KFeds4|KFeds4]] ([[User talk:KFeds4|talk]]) 22:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{reply|Butter no parsnips}} I reworded and moved the sentence to the conclusion section to make it more accurate to what the source actually says. Thanks for pointing this out. [[User:Xexerss|Xexerss]] ([[User talk:Xexerss|talk]]) 04:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
== "[[:The One Piece is real!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
:Do have the actual source where the paragraph came from? [[User:MagmaAdmiral|MagmaAdmiral]] ([[User talk:MagmaAdmiral|talk]]) 16:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]

The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=The_One_Piece_is_real!&redirect=no The One Piece is real!]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#The One Piece is real!}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">[[User:Jay| Jay]]</span><span style="font-size:115%">[[User talk:Jay| 💬]]</span> 07:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
== Clean-up needed in occurence ==
== "[[:Kingofthepirates.com]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==

[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
of the word "manga". Understandably, it will appear. Unnecessarily often though, at my time of writing. Tried to begin but realised the article it is too vast for a morning sitting. Please undertake the work of substituting/removing the word "manga" in its many superfluous instances.
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kingofthepirates.com&redirect=no Kingofthepirates.com]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Kingofthepirates.com}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Mazewaxie|<strong><span style="color: #606060;">Mazewaxie</span></strong>]] ([[User talk:Mazewaxie|<span style=" color: #606060;">talk</span>]] • [[Special:CentralAuth/Mazewaxie|<span style="color: #606060;">contribs</span>]]) 07:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

[[User:Arcsoda|Arcsoda]] ([[User talk:Arcsoda|talk]]) 06:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

== One Piece as Science Fantasy ==

The One Piece should honestly be categorized as a Science Fantasy franchise. [[User:EmperorAlexander99|EmperorAlexander99]] ([[User talk:EmperorAlexander99|talk]]) 12:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 30 September 2024 ==

{{edit semi-protected|One Piece|answered=y}}
change Merchandise, The brand made more than $1 billion in retail sales in Japan by 2004. to:
The brand has made more than $1 billion in retail sales. In addition it has had many large brand collaborations with brands like Uniqlo, Seiko, and Gucci <ref>https://screenrant.com/one-piece-uniqlo-25th-anniversary-team-up/</ref> [[User:Marcellious13|Marcellious13]] ([[User talk:Marcellious13|talk]]) 22:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

:That seems like greatly outdated information, if it was back in 2004. [[User:David A|David A]] ([[User talk:David A|talk]]) 07:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
::Indeed. Given its age and the fact that the 'Merchandise' subsection consisted of the one sentence, I went ahead and moved the info to the 'Sales' subsection. Also, {{re|Marcellious13}}, [[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:'''<!-- Template:ESp -->: your provided source said nothing about Seiko or Gucci. Please provide reliable sources for all information you'd like to added to the article. [[User:DrOrinScrivello|DrOrinScrivello]] ([[User talk:DrOrinScrivello|talk]]) 19:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:08, 13 December 2024

Good articleOne Piece has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 28, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 2, 2015Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 2, 2017Good article nomineeListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 22, 2020, and July 22, 2022.
Current status: Good article


inspired by the wizard of oz?

[edit]

"He was also inspired by The Wizard of Oz, claiming not to endure stories where the reward of adventure is the adventure itself, opting for a story where travel is important, but even more important is the goal.[5]"

Source says "Akashiya also asked Oda about the goal of the main characters in the story, the titular "One Piece" treasure. Akashiya asked if the treasure was "family bonds," and Oda replied, "No, I hate that kind of thing." Oda elaborated, saying, "That's like the ending of The Wizard of Oz, which I watched when I was a kid. Adventuring that long, and having the adventure itself be the treasure, is really dissatisfying. Those kinds of stories are impossible. It feels like, 'I've gone on this long adventure, so give me the treasure!'""

I'm not sure this counts as 'being inspired by', even if we included being inspired to do the opposite out of spite---it seems more like Oda brought up the Wizard of Oz as an example because of the interviewer's question. He certainly does not clearly state that he was inspired to make the treasure at the end of the journey more important than the journey itself because of The Wizard of Oz or as a result of his childhood frustration with it. (The article right now also seems a bit misleading about the story of The Wizard of Oz, lol.)

Not sure if I think this can be edited into something relevant, informative, and correct; or if it should be completely removed from the article. Suggestions? Butter no parsnips (talk) 04:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Butter no parsnips: I reworded and moved the sentence to the conclusion section to make it more accurate to what the source actually says. Thanks for pointing this out. Xexerss (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do have the actual source where the paragraph came from? MagmaAdmiral (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up needed in occurence

[edit]

of the word "manga". Understandably, it will appear. Unnecessarily often though, at my time of writing. Tried to begin but realised the article it is too vast for a morning sitting. Please undertake the work of substituting/removing the word "manga" in its many superfluous instances.

Arcsoda (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One Piece as Science Fantasy

[edit]

The One Piece should honestly be categorized as a Science Fantasy franchise. EmperorAlexander99 (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 September 2024

[edit]

change Merchandise, The brand made more than $1 billion in retail sales in Japan by 2004. to: The brand has made more than $1 billion in retail sales. In addition it has had many large brand collaborations with brands like Uniqlo, Seiko, and Gucci [1] Marcellious13 (talk) 22:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like greatly outdated information, if it was back in 2004. David A (talk) 07:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Given its age and the fact that the 'Merchandise' subsection consisted of the one sentence, I went ahead and moved the info to the 'Sales' subsection. Also, @Marcellious13:,  Not done for now:: your provided source said nothing about Seiko or Gucci. Please provide reliable sources for all information you'd like to added to the article. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 19:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]