Service Corporation International: Difference between revisions
Added another SCI property to the list of "notable properties" presented in the article. |
|||
(23 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2022|cs1-dates=y}} |
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2022|cs1-dates=y}} |
||
{{Infobox company |
{{Infobox company |
||
| name |
| name = Service Corporation International |
||
| logo |
| logo = Service Corporation International logo.svg |
||
| logo_size = 130px |
|||
| type |
| type = [[Public company|Public]] |
||
| traded_as |
| traded_as = {{ubl|{{NYSE|SCI}}|[[S&P 400]] component}} |
||
| key_people |
| key_people = {{ubl|Robert L. Waltrip, Founder|Thomas L. Ryan, CEO}} |
||
| industry |
| industry = [[Death care]] |
||
| products |
| products = [[Funerals]], [[cremation]]s, pre-planning |
||
| brands |
| brands = Dignity Memorial, National Cremation, Advantage, Funeraria Del Angel, Neptune Society |
||
| revenue |
| revenue = {{profit}} {{currency|4,143 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} (2021){{refn|name="4Q21"|{{Cite web |date=2022-02-14 |title=Service Corporation International Announces Fourth Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides 2022 Guidance |url=https://investors.sci-corp.com/2022-02-14-SERVICE-CORPORATION-INTERNATIONAL-ANNOUNCES-FOURTH-QUARTER-2021-FINANCIAL-RESULTS-AND-PROVIDES-2022-GUIDANCE |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526022100/https://investors.sci-corp.com/2022-02-14-SERVICE-CORPORATION-INTERNATIONAL-ANNOUNCES-FOURTH-QUARTER-2021-FINANCIAL-RESULTS-AND-PROVIDES-2022-GUIDANCE |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=SCI |language=en-US |agency=[[PR Newswire]]}}}} |
||
| net_income = {{profit}} {{currency|803 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} (2021){{r|4Q21}} |
|||
| |
| net_income = {{profit}} {{currency|803 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} (2021){{r|4Q21}} |
||
| assets = {{profit}} {{currency|15,691 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} (2021){{refn|name="10K21"|{{Cite web |date=2022-02-15 |title=Form 10-K: Service Corporation International (2021) |url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/89089/000008908922000012/sci-20211231.htm#i5f4d5e2f485045d89171b232b2736f5a_250 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526023943/https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/89089/000008908922000012/sci-20211231.htm%23i5f4d5e2f485045d89171b232b2736f5a_250 |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] |language=en-US}}}} |
|||
| num_employees |
| num_employees = 20,840{{refn|{{Cite web |date=2022-05-23 |title=Service Corp. International |url=http://fortune.com/fortune500/service-corp-international/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526024727/https://fortune.com/company/service-corp-international/fortune500/ |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]] |language=en-US}}}} |
||
| num_employees_year = 2022 |
| num_employees_year = 2022 |
||
| subsid |
| subsid = |
||
| homepage |
| homepage = {{Official website}} |
||
| foundation |
| foundation = 1962 |
||
| location_city |
| location_city = [[Houston, Texas]] |
||
| location_country |
| location_country = U.S. |
||
| locations |
| locations = more than 1,900 (2022){{refn|name="About"|{{Cite web |title=About |url=https://www.sci-corp.com/about |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526025642/https://www.sci-corp.com/about |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=SCI |language=en-US}}}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
[[File:ServiceCorpInternational.jpg|thumb|Headquarters]] |
[[File:ServiceCorpInternational.jpg|thumb|Headquarters]] |
||
'''Service Corporation International''' is an American provider of [[funeral]] goods and services as well as [[cemetery]] property and services. It is headquartered in [[Neartown, Houston, Texas]], and operates secondary corporate offices in [[Jefferson, Louisiana]] (near New Orleans).{{refn|{{Cite web |title=Our Boundaries |url=https://www.neartown.org/our-boundaries |url-status=live |archive-url= |
'''Service Corporation International''' is an American provider of [[funeral]] goods and services as well as [[cemetery]] property and services. It is headquartered in [[Neartown, Houston, Texas]], and operates secondary corporate offices in [[Jefferson, Louisiana]] (near New Orleans).{{refn|{{Cite web |title=Our Boundaries |url=https://www.neartown.org/our-boundaries |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20190322000200/https://www.neartown.org/our-boundaries |archive-date=2019-03-22 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=Neartown Association |language=en-US}}}}{{refn|{{Cite web |title=Contact Us |url=https://www.sci-corp.com/contact-us |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526030310/https://www.sci-corp.com/contact-us |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=SCI |language=en-US}}}} SCI operates more than 1500 funeral homes and 400 cemeteries.{{r|About}} |
||
== Company history == |
== Company history == |
||
Robert L. Waltrip founded the company in 1962.{{refn|{{Cite web |last=Ille |first=Nicholas V. |date=2020-05-10 |title=Who is Service Corporation International? |url=http://www.us-funerals.com/service-corporation-international.html |url-status=live |archive-url= |
Robert L. Waltrip founded the company in 1962.{{refn|{{Cite web |last=Ille |first=Nicholas V. |date=2020-05-10 |title=Who is Service Corporation International? |url=http://www.us-funerals.com/service-corporation-international.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526031048/https://www.us-funerals.com/who-is-service-corporation-international-sci/ |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=US Funerals Online |language=en-US}}}} SCI began as a small network of funeral homes and cemeteries in the [[Houston]] area. |
||
SCI, [[Alderwoods Group]], and [[Stewart Enterprises]] emerged from the 1990s as the three largest companies in the industry. On {{date2|December|31, |1999}}, SCI owned and operated 3,823 funeral service locations, 525 [[cemeteries]], 198 crematoria and two insurance operations located in 20 countries on five continents.{{refn|{{Cite web |date=2000-03-30 |title=Form 10-K: Service Corporation International (1999) |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/89089/000095012900001534/0000950129-00-001534.txt |url-status=live |archive-url= |
SCI, [[Alderwoods Group]], and [[Stewart Enterprises]] emerged from the 1990s as the three largest companies in the industry. On {{date2|December|31, |1999}}, SCI owned and operated 3,823 funeral service locations, 525 [[cemeteries]], 198 crematoria and two insurance operations located in 20 countries on five continents.{{refn|{{Cite web |date=2000-03-30 |title=Form 10-K: Service Corporation International (1999) |url=https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/89089/000095012900001534/0000950129-00-001534.txt |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526031945/https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/89089/000095012900001534/0000950129-00-001534.txt |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] |language=en-US}}}} |
||
In 1999, SCI also introduced Dignity Memorial.{{refn|{{Cite news |date=2007-07-17 |title=Dignity Memorial Extends Network by Nearly 600 Locations |language=en-US |work=[[Houston Chronicle]] |agency=[[PR Newswire]] |url=https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-Dignity-Memorial-R-Extends-Network-by-1841036.php |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
In 1999, SCI also introduced its '''Dignity Memorial''' branding.{{refn|{{Cite news |date=2007-07-17 |title=Dignity Memorial Extends Network by Nearly 600 Locations |language=en-US |work=[[Houston Chronicle]] |agency=[[PR Newswire]] |url=https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-Dignity-Memorial-R-Extends-Network-by-1841036.php |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526035534/https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-Dignity-Memorial-R-Extends-Network-by-1841036.php |archive-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
||
Between 2002 and 2006, SCI reduced its net debt (total debt minus cash) by more than {{currency|1.0 billion|USD|passthrough=yes}}, increased operating cash flow, and simplified its field management organization to enhance efficiency, performance, and accountability. It also changed business and sales processes, tightened internal controls following the protocols, strengthened corporate governance standards, and established a new training and development system. For its shareholders, SCI returned value through more than {{currency|335 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} in [[share repurchase]]s and it resumed payment of a regular quarterly dividend in early 2005, the first since 1999.{{ |
Between 2002 and 2006, SCI reduced its net debt (total debt minus cash) by more than {{currency|1.0 billion|USD|passthrough=yes}}, increased operating cash flow, and simplified its field management organization to enhance efficiency, performance, and accountability. It also changed business and sales processes, tightened internal controls following the protocols, strengthened corporate governance standards, and established a new training and development system. For its shareholders, SCI returned value through more than {{currency|335 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} in [[share repurchase]]s and it resumed payment of a regular quarterly dividend in early 2005, the first since 1999.{{refn|name="history"|{{Cite web |title=History |url=http://www.sci-corp.com/SCICORP/History.aspx?alias=0103 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070903202320/http://www.sci-corp.com/SCICORP/History.aspx?alias=0103 |archive-date=2007-09-03 |access-date=2007-08-29 |website=SCI |language=en-US}}}} |
||
== |
== Acquisitions == |
||
In 2006, SCI merged with Alderwoods Group, its nearest competitor in terms of size. The [[Federal Trade Commission]] (FTC) blocked the merger, citing concerns over consumer choice. After |
In 2006, SCI merged with Alderwoods Group, its nearest competitor in terms of size. The [[Federal Trade Commission]] (FTC) blocked the merger, citing concerns over consumer choice. After SCI agreed to divest funeral home and cemetery locations in several markets and end licensing agreements with other funeral homes, the FTC allowed the merger to continue. By 2007, the integration of Alderwoods's locations and operations was complete. |
||
In 2009, SCI put in a bid to purchase Keystone North America for {{currency|208 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} ({{currency|{{inflation|US|208|2009}}|USD}} million as of {{inflation/year|US}}). The purchase was completed in 2010 and added about 200 locations. |
In 2009, SCI put in a bid to purchase Keystone North America for {{currency|208 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} ({{currency|{{inflation|US|208|2009}}|USD}} million as of {{inflation/year|US}}). The purchase was completed in 2010 and added about 200 locations. |
||
In May 2013, SCI signed a {{currency|1.4 billion|USD|passthrough=yes}} deal to purchase [[Stewart Enterprises]], the second-largest [[death care]] company.{{refn|name="ftc2013"|{{Cite press release |title=FTC Puts Conditions on Service Corporation International's Proposed $1.4 Billion Acquisition of Rival Funeral and Cemetery Services Provider |date=2013-12-23 |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2013/12/ftc-puts-conditions-service-corporation-internationals-proposed |language=en-US |access-date=2022-05-26 |url-status=live |archive-url= |
In May 2013, SCI signed a {{currency|1.4 billion|USD|passthrough=yes}} deal to purchase [[Stewart Enterprises]], the second-largest [[death care]] company.{{refn|name="ftc2013"|{{Cite press release |title=FTC Puts Conditions on Service Corporation International's Proposed $1.4 Billion Acquisition of Rival Funeral and Cemetery Services Provider |date=2013-12-23 |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2013/12/ftc-puts-conditions-service-corporation-internationals-proposed |language=en-US |access-date=2022-05-26 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526042512/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2013/12/ftc-puts-conditions-service-corporation-internationals-proposed-14-billion-acquisition-rival-funeral |archive-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[Federal Trade Commission]]}}}} In December 2013, the FTC imposed conditions on the acquisition, requiring the two companies to sell 53 funeral homes and 38 cemeteries in 59 local markets, and requiring the merged company to be subject to a ten-year period during which the FTC will review any attempt by the company to acquire funeral or cemetery assets in those local markets.{{r|ftc2013}} |
||
== Brands == |
== Brands == |
||
SCI operates the following brands in the United States and Canada:{{refn|{{Cite web |title=Our Brands |url=https://www.sci-corp.com/about/our-brands |url-status=live |archive-url= |
SCI operates the following brands in the United States and Canada:{{refn|{{Cite web |title=Our Brands |url=https://www.sci-corp.com/about/our-brands |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526043145/https://www.sci-corp.com/about/our-brands |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=SCI |language=en-US}}}} |
||
* Advantage |
* Advantage |
||
Line 58: | Line 59: | ||
== Notable properties == |
== Notable properties == |
||
* [[Caballero Rivero Woodlawn Park North Cemetery and Mausoleum]] in [[Miami]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
* [[Frank E. Campbell Funeral Chapel]] in [[Manhattan]], [[New York City]]{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Jaynes |first=Gregory |date=1988-06-08 |title=90 Subdued Years Of Funerals For the Famous |language=en-US |page=B1 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/08/nyregion/about-new-york-90-subdued-years-of-funerals-for-the-famous.html |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
* [[Frank E. Campbell Funeral Chapel]] in [[Manhattan]], [[New York City]]{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Jaynes |first=Gregory |date=1988-06-08 |title=90 Subdued Years Of Funerals For the Famous |language=en-US |page=B1 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/08/nyregion/about-new-york-90-subdued-years-of-funerals-for-the-famous.html |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
||
* [[Glenwood Memorial Gardens]], [[Broomall, Pennsylvania]] |
* [[Glenwood Memorial Gardens]], [[Broomall, Pennsylvania]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Greenwood/Memory Lawn Mortuary & Cemetery]] in [[Phoenix, Arizona]] |
||
* Joseph Gawler's Sons in [[Washington, D.C.]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
* Pierce Brothers Mortuary in [[Los Angeles]] |
* Pierce Brothers Mortuary in [[Los Angeles]] |
||
* [[Riverside Memorial Chapel]] in Manhattan, New York City |
* [[Riverside Memorial Chapel]] in Manhattan, New York City |
||
* [[Sparkman-Hillcrest Memorial Park Cemetery]] in [[Dallas]] |
* [[Sparkman-Hillcrest Memorial Park Cemetery]] in [[Dallas]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[Westwood Village Memorial Park]] in [[Westwood, Los Angeles, California]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* [[Woodlawn Memorial Park Cemetery (Colma, California)|Woodlawn Memorial Park Cemetery]] in [[Colma, California]] |
* [[Woodlawn Memorial Park Cemetery (Colma, California)|Woodlawn Memorial Park Cemetery]] in [[Colma, California]] |
||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
=== Costs === |
=== Costs === |
||
Writing in an {{date2|October|24, |2013}}, issue of ''[[Bloomberg Businessweek]]'', journalist Paul M. Barrett found, despite its lower overhead, SCI has higher prices than independent funeral home operators. Barrett quoted "data compiled" by a "'concierge' funeral planning service" Everest Funeral Package, which found that for "traditional funerals, SCI charges {{currency|6256|USD}} on average (excluding casket and cemetery plot), 42 percent more than independents."{{refn|name=Barrett|{{Cite magazine |last=Barrett |first=Paul M. |date=2013-10-24 |title=Is Funeral Home Chain SCI's Growth Coming at the Expense of Mourners? |url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-24/is-funeral-home-chain-scis-growth-coming-at-the-expense-of-mourners |magazine=[[Bloomberg Businessweek]] |language=en-US |access-date=2022-05-26 |url-access=subscription}}}} In reply, SCI points to "overwhelmingly positive responses" on customer surveys |
Writing in an {{date2|October|24, |2013}}, issue of ''[[Bloomberg Businessweek]]'', journalist Paul M. Barrett found, despite its lower overhead, SCI has higher prices than independent funeral home operators. Barrett quoted "data compiled" by a {{"'}}concierge' funeral planning service" Everest Funeral Package, which found that for "traditional funerals, SCI charges {{currency|6256|USD}} on average (excluding casket and cemetery plot), 42 percent more than independents."{{refn|name=Barrett|{{Cite magazine |last=Barrett |first=Paul M. |date=2013-10-24 |title=Is Funeral Home Chain SCI's Growth Coming at the Expense of Mourners? |url=http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-24/is-funeral-home-chain-scis-growth-coming-at-the-expense-of-mourners |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131027080930/http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-24/is-funeral-home-chain-scis-growth-coming-at-the-expense-of-mourners |url-status=dead |archive-date=October 27, 2013 |magazine=[[Bloomberg Businessweek]] |language=en-US |access-date=2022-05-26 |url-access=subscription}} }} In reply, SCI points to "overwhelmingly positive responses" on customer surveys and states they provide "top value" at a variety of funeral price points.{{r|Barrett}} |
||
=== Texas === |
=== Texas === |
||
Line 79: | Line 82: | ||
Referred to as "Funeralgate" or "Formaldegate" in the media, the controversy was widely publicized when Eliza May, a director with the Texas Funeral Service Commission (TFSC), was fired while investigating SCI. May alleged in a civil suit that she was fired because she refused to halt her investigation despite pressure to do so from Governor Bush. |
Referred to as "Funeralgate" or "Formaldegate" in the media, the controversy was widely publicized when Eliza May, a director with the Texas Funeral Service Commission (TFSC), was fired while investigating SCI. May alleged in a civil suit that she was fired because she refused to halt her investigation despite pressure to do so from Governor Bush. |
||
May's lawyers subpoenaed President Bush to testify at the trial,{{refn|name="Bryce2"|{{Cite web |last=Bryce |first=Robert |date=1999-07-21 |title=The Texas way of death |url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/21/bush |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070625045248/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/21/bush/ |archive-date=2007-06-25 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[Salon (website)|Salon]] |language=en-US}}}} but Texas judge John K. Dietz threw out the subpoena on the grounds that the then-governor was not in a position to have enough specialized information to require his involvement.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Duggan |first=Paul |date=1999-08-30 |title=Bush Need Not Testify, Judge Rules |language=en-US |page=A2 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |location=[[Austin, Texas]] |publication-date=1999-08-31 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/texas083199.htm |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
May's lawyers subpoenaed President Bush to testify at the trial,{{refn|name="Bryce2"|{{Cite web |last=Bryce |first=Robert |date=1999-07-21 |title=The Texas way of death |url=http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/21/bush |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070625045248/http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/21/bush/ |archive-date=2007-06-25 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[Salon (website)|Salon]] |language=en-US}}}} but Texas judge John K. Dietz threw out the subpoena on the grounds that the then-governor was not in a position to have enough specialized information to require his involvement.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Duggan |first=Paul |date=1999-08-30 |title=Bush Need Not Testify, Judge Rules |language=en-US |page=A2 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |location=[[Austin, Texas]] |publication-date=1999-08-31 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/texas083199.htm |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130707053646/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/texas083199.htm |archive-date=2013-07-07}}}} |
||
The lawsuit was settled in 2001 for more than {{currency|200000|USD}} (equivalent to {{currency|{{inflation|US|200000|2001}}|USD}} in {{inflation/year|US}}). SCI and the state of [[Texas]] were required to jointly pay the decision.{{refn|name="Bryce3"|{{Cite news |last=Bryce |first=Robert |date=2004-05-14 |title=Final Disposition: The Texas Funeral Service Commission is up to its ashes in trouble again |work=[[Austin Chronicle]] |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A210893 |url-status=live |archive-url= |
The lawsuit was settled in 2001 for more than {{currency|200000|USD}} (equivalent to {{currency|{{inflation|US|200000|2001}}|USD}} in {{inflation/year|US}}). SCI and the state of [[Texas]] were required to jointly pay the decision.{{refn|name="Bryce3"|{{Cite news |last=Bryce |first=Robert |date=2004-05-14 |title=Final Disposition: The Texas Funeral Service Commission is up to its ashes in trouble again |work=[[Austin Chronicle]] |url=http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A210893 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130117081258/http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2004-05-14/210893/ |archive-date=2013-01-17}}}} On {{date2|January|23, |2004}}, the TFSC fined SCI an additional {{currency|21000|USD}} for administrative penalties.{{r|Bryce3}} |
||
=== Florida === |
=== Florida === |
||
On January 18, 2023, it was reported on local news that the Escambia County Sheriffs Office was called to investigate a crime of corpse abuse by an employee who was caught in the act, by another employee. The alleged criminal was never charged with the crime because he committed suicide the same day. |
|||
The investigation into the crime and the Oaklawn Funeral Home is still pending. |
|||
In 2001, it was reported that employees of the Memorial Gardens cemetery near [[Fort Lauderdale, Florida]], had oversold the cemetery, so bodies were buried in the wrong places, separating husbands from wives; vaults were cracked open by a backhoe, bodies were exhumed, with bones, skulls and shrouds thrown into nearby woods, bodies were stacked on top of each other, and remains were relocated without notifying relatives. |
In 2001, it was reported that employees of the Memorial Gardens cemetery near [[Fort Lauderdale, Florida]], had oversold the cemetery, so bodies were buried in the wrong places, separating husbands from wives; vaults were cracked open by a backhoe, bodies were exhumed, with bones, skulls and shrouds thrown into nearby woods, bodies were stacked on top of each other, and remains were relocated without notifying relatives. |
||
The allegations were particularly appalling to the [[Jewish]] cemetery's more religiously observant customers, ''[[The Miami Herald]]'' reported. Traditional Jewish law requires bodies to be buried intact and prohibits disturbing the dead.{{refn|{{Cite web |date=2015-01-13 |title=Gruesome Photos, Video Show Bodies Discarded in Woods Behind Cemetery |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/gruesome-photos-video-show-bodies-discarded-in-woods-behind-cemetery |url-status=live |archive-url= |
The allegations were particularly appalling to the [[Jewish]] cemetery's more religiously observant customers, ''[[The Miami Herald]]'' reported. Traditional Jewish law requires bodies to be buried intact and prohibits disturbing the dead.{{refn|{{Cite web |date=2015-01-13 |title=Gruesome Photos, Video Show Bodies Discarded in Woods Behind Cemetery |url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/gruesome-photos-video-show-bodies-discarded-in-woods-behind-cemetery |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526071052/https://www.foxnews.com/story/gruesome-photos-video-show-bodies-discarded-in-woods-behind-cemetery |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[Fox News]] |language=en-US |agency=[[Associated Press]]}}}} SCI reached a {{currency|14 million|USD|passthrough=yes}} agreement with the Florida attorney general's office in 2003 that required it to repair plots and reorganize the cemeteries to ensure all graves were properly marked and the grounds could accommodate all plots sold. SCI also settled a separate class-action lawsuit on behalf of 350 families for {{currency|100 million|USD|passthrough=yes}}.{{refn|{{Cite web |last=Barrett |first=Paul M. |date=2014-02-28 |title=Huge Funeral Chain Settles Graveyard Desecration Suit, Buries Financial Details |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-28/service-corporation-international-settles-grave-desecration-suit |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[Bloomberg Businessweek]] |language=en-US}}}} |
||
=== Virginia === |
=== Virginia === |
||
On {{date2|April|26, |2007}}, ''[[The Washington Post]]'' reported that an SCI cemetery in [[Alexandria, Virginia]], had improperly buried the remains of the stillborn daughter of Nsombi Hale in a grave too shallow (in a grave about {{convert|8|in|cm}} deep). Nsombi Hale was filing suit against SCI.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-04-26 |title=Too Shallow a Hole to Bury a Baby |language=en-US |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/25/AR2009042503075.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
On {{date2|April|26, |2007}}, ''[[The Washington Post]]'' reported that an SCI cemetery in [[Alexandria, Virginia]], had improperly buried the remains of the stillborn daughter of Nsombi Hale in a grave too shallow (in a grave about {{convert|8|in|cm}} deep). Nsombi Hale was filing suit against SCI.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-04-26 |title=Too Shallow a Hole to Bury a Baby |language=en-US |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/25/AR2009042503075.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130209031245/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/25/AR2009042503075.html |archive-date=2013-02-09}}}} |
||
After an internal investigation by SCI, attorneys working for SCI denied the charges against the company in a letter to Virginia funeral regulators,{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-07-02 |title=Falls Church Funeral Home Denies Mishandling Bodies |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070103963.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
After an internal investigation by SCI, attorneys working for SCI denied the charges against the company in a letter to Virginia funeral regulators,{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-07-02 |title=Falls Church Funeral Home Denies Mishandling Bodies |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070103963.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130205195741/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070103963.html |archive-date=2013-02-05}}}} and a few days later, the ''Post'' reported that Robert Ranghelli, one of the SCI employees who had corroborated the initial reports of improper handing of corpses, was fired for "exercising his first amendment rights/speaking with the media" after having been on administrative leave for several months following the initial reports in the newspaper.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-07-07 |title=Funeral Worker Who Alleged Violations Is Fired |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/06/AR2009070602767.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130209013706/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/06/AR2009070602767.html |archive-date=2013-02-09}}}} |
||
On {{date2|April|5, |2009}}, ''The Washington Post'' reported that the National Funeral Home, a facility owned by SCI in the [[Falls Church]] area of [[Fairfax County, Virginia]], which also acts as a centralized embalming and dressing station for embalming and body preparation for other nearby SCI-owned operations (Arlington Funeral Home, Danzansky-Goldberg Memorial Chapel, and Demaine Funeral Home), was storing naked bodies in various stages of decomposition in conditions described as "disgusting, degrading and humiliating". The story went on to report that as many as 200 bodies were stored on "makeshift gurneys in the garage" and "at least half a dozen veterans destined for the hallowed ground at [[Arlington National Cemetery]] were left in their coffins on a garage rack". The ''Post'' reported that documentation describing these conditions had been reported to the Virginia Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers.{{refn|name="FHE"|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-04-05 |title=Funeral Home Employees Say Bodies Were Mishandled |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/04/AR2009040402976.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
On {{date2|April|5, |2009}}, ''The Washington Post'' reported that the [[National Memorial Park | National Funeral Home]], a facility owned by SCI in the [[Falls Church]] area of [[Fairfax County, Virginia]], which also acts as a centralized embalming and dressing station for embalming and body preparation for other nearby SCI-owned operations (Arlington Funeral Home, Danzansky-Goldberg Memorial Chapel, and Demaine Funeral Home), was storing naked bodies in various stages of decomposition in conditions described as "disgusting, degrading and humiliating". The story went on to report that as many as 200 bodies were stored on "makeshift gurneys in the garage" and "at least half a dozen veterans destined for the hallowed ground at [[Arlington National Cemetery]] were left in their coffins on a garage rack". The ''Post'' reported that documentation describing these conditions had been reported to the Virginia Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers.{{refn|name="FHE"|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-04-05 |title=Funeral Home Employees Say Bodies Were Mishandled |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/04/AR2009040402976.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130209042532/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/04/AR2009040402976.html |archive-date=2013-02-09}}}} |
||
A few days later, the ''Post'' reported that family members of a deceased Army veteran whose remains were stored in an unrefrigerated garage at National Funeral Home asked the [[Fairfax County, Virginia|Fairfax County]] [[Commonwealth's Attorney]] to investigate the actions of National and its parent company, SCI, as crimes.{{r|FHE}} |
A few days later, the ''Post'' reported that family members of a deceased Army veteran whose remains were stored in an unrefrigerated garage at National Funeral Home asked the [[Fairfax County, Virginia|Fairfax County]] [[Commonwealth's Attorney]] to investigate the actions of National and its parent company, SCI, as crimes.{{r|FHE}} |
||
The ''Post'' further reported that the family of retired [[U.S. Army]] Colonel Andrew DeGraff filed a lawsuit in Fairfax County alleging that SCI mishandled DeGraff's remains. According to the article, an SCI spokesman said that the company is conducting an internal investigation.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-04-15 |title=Family Sues Funeral Home That Left Body in Garage |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/14/AR2009041403071.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
The ''Post'' further reported that the family of retired [[U.S. Army]] Colonel Andrew DeGraff filed a lawsuit in Fairfax County alleging that SCI mishandled DeGraff's remains. According to the article, an SCI spokesman said that the company is conducting an internal investigation.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=White |first=Josh |date=2009-04-15 |title=Family Sues Funeral Home That Left Body in Garage |language=en-US |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/14/AR2009041403071.html |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130209013338/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/14/AR2009041403071.html |archive-date=2013-02-09}}}} |
||
=== California === |
=== California === |
||
On {{date2|September|14, |2009}}, a [[class-action]] lawsuit was filed against SCI and Eden Memorial Park, a Jewish cemetery managed by SCI in [[Mission Hills, Los Angeles|Mission Hills]] charging that they were destroying graves to make room for new interments.{{refn|{{Cite web |last1=Boudreau |first1=Abbie |last2=Zamost |first2=Scott |date=2009-09-11 |title=California cemetery accused of desecrating remains |url=https://www.cnn.com/2009/US/09/11/siu.cemetery.remains/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url= |
On {{date2|September|14, |2009}}, a [[class-action]] lawsuit was filed against SCI and Eden Memorial Park, a Jewish cemetery managed by SCI in [[Mission Hills, Los Angeles|Mission Hills]] charging that they were destroying graves to make room for new interments.{{refn|{{Cite web |last1=Boudreau |first1=Abbie |last2=Zamost |first2=Scott |date=2009-09-11 |title=California cemetery accused of desecrating remains |url=https://www.cnn.com/2009/US/09/11/siu.cemetery.remains/index.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526075039/https://www.cnn.com/2009/US/09/11/siu.cemetery.remains/index.html |archive-date=2022-05-26 |access-date=2022-05-26 |website=[[CNN]] |language=en-US}}}} |
||
The ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reported that state officials found no evidence of mass grave disturbances. Russ Heimerich, a spokesman for the state Department of Consumer Affairs, said, "We have not seen any evidence of the kind of massive desecration that is being alleged. The kind of activity they're alleging is not easily hidden, especially on a willful, large-scale basis." The plaintiff's attorney rejected the findings of the state's investigation. |
The ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reported that state officials found no evidence of mass grave disturbances. Russ Heimerich, a spokesman for the state Department of Consumer Affairs, said, "We have not seen any evidence of the kind of massive desecration that is being alleged. The kind of activity they're alleging is not easily hidden, especially on a willful, large-scale basis." The plaintiff's attorney rejected the findings of the state's investigation. |
||
Line 106: | Line 112: | ||
[[Michael Avenatti]], the plaintiff's attorney, said more than 800 families have joined the class action suit. Avenatti claims the state's investigation was shoddy, saying, "Investigators from the state were told by various groundskeepers over a year ago that they had been repeatedly told to throw bones away, and yet for some reason, the state didn't adequately follow up." |
[[Michael Avenatti]], the plaintiff's attorney, said more than 800 families have joined the class action suit. Avenatti claims the state's investigation was shoddy, saying, "Investigators from the state were told by various groundskeepers over a year ago that they had been repeatedly told to throw bones away, and yet for some reason, the state didn't adequately follow up." |
||
SCI denied all charges. After the lawsuit was filed, the Consumer Affairs Department reviewed five to six years of the cemetery's annual inspection records and found no indication that graves had been disturbed. According to the ''Los Angeles Times'' article, "The agency also asked the dozens of families that contacted officials to look for signs of disturbances{{thinsp|—}}shifted or cracked gravestones or anything else that appeared different from previous visits{{thinsp|—}}and didn't receive a single call back, he said."{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Kim |first=Victoria |date=2009-11-13 |title=State officials find no evidence of mass grave desecration in Valley |language=en-US |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-graves13-2009nov13,0,5184185.story |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
SCI denied all charges. After the lawsuit was filed, the Consumer Affairs Department reviewed five to six years of the cemetery's annual inspection records and found no indication that graves had been disturbed. According to the ''Los Angeles Times'' article, "The agency also asked the dozens of families that contacted officials to look for signs of disturbances{{thinsp|—}}shifted or cracked gravestones or anything else that appeared different from previous visits{{thinsp|—}}and didn't receive a single call back, he said."{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Kim |first=Victoria |date=2009-11-13 |title=State officials find no evidence of mass grave desecration in Valley |language=en-US |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-graves13-2009nov13,0,5184185.story |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526080835/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2009-nov-13-me-graves13-story.html |archive-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
||
In January 2012, the lawsuit against Eden Memorial Park was ruled to be a valid class action in Los Angeles [[California Superior Court|Superior Court]], with the trial scheduled to begin in May 2012. In February 2014, the parties reached a settlement in the amount of {{currency|80.5 million|USD|passthrough=yes}}.{{refn|refn={{Cite news |last=Moshtaghian |first=Artemis |date=2014-02-27 |title=California cemetery agrees to $80 million settlement over desecrating remains |language=en-US |work=[[CNN]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/27/us/california-cemetery-settlement/index.html?hpt=ju_c2 |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140305043304/http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/27/us/california-cemetery-settlement/index.html?hpt=ju_c2 |archive-date=2014-03-05}} [https://megalodon.jp/2022-0526-1712-39/https://www.cnn.com:443/2014/02/27/us/california-cemetery-settlement/index.html?hpt=ju_c2 Alt URL]}} |
|||
In |
In 2015, families filed a second suit alleging that the practice continued after the first settlement.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Abram |first=Susan |date=2015-03-07 |title=Jewish cemetery Eden Memorial Park sued again for throwing out remains |language=en-US |work=[[Los Angeles Daily News]] |url=https://www.dailynews.com/2015/03/07/jewish-cemetery-eden-memorial-park-sued-again-for-throwing-out-remains/ |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526081846/https://www.dailynews.com/2015/03/07/jewish-cemetery-eden-memorial-park-sued-again-for-throwing-out-remains/ |archive-date=2022-05-26}}}} The suit remains pending {{As of|2020|lc=y}}. |
||
In 2024, the attorney general of California announced a settlement with SCI, which does business in the state under their Neptune Society and Trident Society brands, for state enforcement actions that alleged that SCI had violated the [[California Unfair Competition Law]] and [[California Unfair Competition Law#Elements of a false advertising claim|False Advertising Law]] by engaging in false and deceptive advertising in the marketing and sale of pre-need cremation packages. The proposed settlement which is pending court approval, would provide full restitution to customers, comprehensive injunctive relief, and $23 million in civil penalties.{{refn|refn={{Cite news |last=Hernandez |first=David |date=2024-05-01 |title=Biggest funeral company in U.S. to pay huge sum to settle California suit over cremation services |language=en-US |work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]] |url=https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/california-cremation-funeral-services-settlement-19434032.php |access-date=2024-05-01 }}}} |
|||
In 2015, families filed a second suit alleging that the practice continued after the first settlement.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Abram |first=Susan |date=2015-03-07 |title=Jewish cemetery Eden Memorial Park sued again for throwing out remains |language=en-US |work=[[Los Angeles Daily News]] |url=https://www.dailynews.com/2015/03/07/jewish-cemetery-eden-memorial-park-sued-again-for-throwing-out-remains/ |url-status=live |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=http://archive.today/2022.05.26-081846/https://www.dailynews.com/2015/03/07/jewish-cemetery-eden-memorial-park-sued-again-for-throwing-out-remains/ |archive-date=2022-05-26}}}} The suit remains pending {{As of|2020|lc=y}}. |
|||
=== Massachusetts === |
=== Massachusetts === |
||
In 2010, the State Board of Registration charged the SCI-owned Stanetsky Chapel, a Jewish funeral home in [[Brookline, Massachusetts|Brookline]] with serious violations of state law and regulations in connection with an incident where a woman was buried in the wrong grave, then disinterred without a legal permit and reburied in the correct grave with the woman's family not being notified of the mistake and the corrective procedure. As a result, in December 2011, the State Board announced a Consent Agreement and levied the biggest fine in its history, {{currency|18000|USD}}, against Stanetsky and SCI, and suspended the license of the Stanetsky general manager for a year. Other staff members involved in the incident were subject to punitive actions ranging from additional professional training to license revocation. The incident received widespread local media coverage. The Board's action was also published on its website.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Applebaum |first=Teddy |date=2011-12-21 |title=Brookline funeral home fined for burial mix up |language=en-US |work=Wicked Local |url=https://brookline.wickedlocal.com/article/20111221/NEWS/312219647 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url= |
In 2010, the State Board of Registration charged the SCI-owned Stanetsky Chapel, a Jewish funeral home in [[Brookline, Massachusetts|Brookline]] with serious violations of state law and regulations in connection with an incident where a woman was buried in the wrong grave, then disinterred without a legal permit and reburied in the correct grave with the woman's family not being notified of the mistake and the corrective procedure. As a result, in December 2011, the State Board announced a Consent Agreement and levied the biggest fine in its history, {{currency|18000|USD}}, against Stanetsky and SCI, and suspended the license of the Stanetsky general manager for a year. Other staff members involved in the incident were subject to punitive actions ranging from additional professional training to license revocation. The incident received widespread local media coverage. The Board's action was also published on its website.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Applebaum |first=Teddy |date=2011-12-21 |title=Brookline funeral home fined for burial mix up |language=en-US |work=Wicked Local |url=https://brookline.wickedlocal.com/article/20111221/NEWS/312219647 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220526084025/https://www.wickedlocal.com/story/brookline-tab/2011/12/21/brookline-funeral-home-fined-for/39953525007/ |archive-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
||
In a case first reported on {{date2|April|7, |2005}}, ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' reported J.S. Waterman's & Sons, also owned by SCI, was found by the Board to have accidentally cremated the body of a stillborn infant in 2003. The infant's body was apparently placed on a gurney that held an adult woman's body that was scheduled for cremation. As a result of a civil suit brought by the infant's family, Waterman's was ordered to pay the parents {{currency|325000|USD}} (equivalent to {{currency|{{inflation|US|325000|2008}}|USD}} in {{inflation/year|US}}), with a pending legal claim that the mortuary violated the state's [[consumer protection]] law that could triple the damages, ''The Boston Globe'' reported. The family's lawyer, Gordon T. Walker, said SCI could be hit with additional costs, as there is a pending claim that the company violated the state's consumer protection law. The civil verdict was made in Suffolk Superior Court on {{date2|March|4, |2008}}. The jury awarded {{currency|75000|USD}} because of emotional distress and {{currency|250000|USD}} because it found the funeral home was negligent and intentionally inflicted emotional harm.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Ellement |first=John R. |date=2008-03-05 |title=Jury faults mortuary for losing remains |language=en-US |work=The Boston Globe |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/05/jury_faults_mortuary_for_losing_remains/ |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
In a case first reported on {{date2|April|7, |2005}}, ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' reported J.S. Waterman's & Sons, also owned by SCI, was found by the Board to have accidentally cremated the body of a stillborn infant in 2003. The infant's body was apparently placed on a gurney that held an adult woman's body that was scheduled for cremation. As a result of a civil suit brought by the infant's family, Waterman's was ordered to pay the parents {{currency|325000|USD}} (equivalent to {{currency|{{inflation|US|325000|2008}}|USD}} in {{inflation/year|US}}), with a pending legal claim that the mortuary violated the state's [[consumer protection]] law that could triple the damages, ''The Boston Globe'' reported. The family's lawyer, Gordon T. Walker, said SCI could be hit with additional costs, as there is a pending claim that the company violated the state's consumer protection law. The civil verdict was made in Suffolk Superior Court on {{date2|March|4, |2008}}. The jury awarded {{currency|75000|USD}} because of emotional distress and {{currency|250000|USD}} because it found the funeral home was negligent and intentionally inflicted emotional harm.{{refn|{{Cite news |last=Ellement |first=John R. |date=2008-03-05 |title=Jury faults mortuary for losing remains |language=en-US |work=The Boston Globe |url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/05/jury_faults_mortuary_for_losing_remains/ |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-05-26}}}} |
||
Line 124: | Line 132: | ||
* {{Official website}} |
* {{Official website}} |
||
{{S&P 400 companies}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
Line 131: | Line 140: | ||
[[Category:Companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange]] |
[[Category:Companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange]] |
||
[[Category:Funeral-related companies]] |
[[Category:Funeral-related companies]] |
||
[[Category:Companies in the S&P 400]] |
|||
[[Category:Service Corporation International| ]] |
Latest revision as of 14:21, 13 December 2024
Company type | Public |
---|---|
Industry | Death care |
Founded | 1962 |
Headquarters | , U.S. |
Number of locations | more than 1,900 (2022)[1] |
Key people |
|
Products | Funerals, cremations, pre-planning |
Brands | Dignity Memorial, National Cremation, Advantage, Funeraria Del Angel, Neptune Society |
Revenue | US$4,143 million (2021)[2] |
US$803 million (2021)[2] | |
Total assets | US$15,691 million (2021)[3] |
Number of employees | 20,840[4] (2022) |
Website | Official website |
Service Corporation International is an American provider of funeral goods and services as well as cemetery property and services. It is headquartered in Neartown, Houston, Texas, and operates secondary corporate offices in Jefferson, Louisiana (near New Orleans).[5][6] SCI operates more than 1500 funeral homes and 400 cemeteries.[1]
Company history
[edit]Robert L. Waltrip founded the company in 1962.[7] SCI began as a small network of funeral homes and cemeteries in the Houston area.
SCI, Alderwoods Group, and Stewart Enterprises emerged from the 1990s as the three largest companies in the industry. On December 31, 1999, SCI owned and operated 3,823 funeral service locations, 525 cemeteries, 198 crematoria and two insurance operations located in 20 countries on five continents.[8]
In 1999, SCI also introduced its Dignity Memorial branding.[9]
Between 2002 and 2006, SCI reduced its net debt (total debt minus cash) by more than US$1.0 billion, increased operating cash flow, and simplified its field management organization to enhance efficiency, performance, and accountability. It also changed business and sales processes, tightened internal controls following the protocols, strengthened corporate governance standards, and established a new training and development system. For its shareholders, SCI returned value through more than US$335 million in share repurchases and it resumed payment of a regular quarterly dividend in early 2005, the first since 1999.[10]
Acquisitions
[edit]In 2006, SCI merged with Alderwoods Group, its nearest competitor in terms of size. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) blocked the merger, citing concerns over consumer choice. After SCI agreed to divest funeral home and cemetery locations in several markets and end licensing agreements with other funeral homes, the FTC allowed the merger to continue. By 2007, the integration of Alderwoods's locations and operations was complete.
In 2009, SCI put in a bid to purchase Keystone North America for US$208 million (US$295 million as of 2023). The purchase was completed in 2010 and added about 200 locations.
In May 2013, SCI signed a US$1.4 billion deal to purchase Stewart Enterprises, the second-largest death care company.[11] In December 2013, the FTC imposed conditions on the acquisition, requiring the two companies to sell 53 funeral homes and 38 cemeteries in 59 local markets, and requiring the merged company to be subject to a ten-year period during which the FTC will review any attempt by the company to acquire funeral or cemetery assets in those local markets.[11]
Brands
[edit]SCI operates the following brands in the United States and Canada:[12]
- Advantage
- Caballero Rivero
- Dignité
- Dignity Memorial
- Dignity Memorial Premier Collection
- Funeraria del Angel
- LHT Consulting Group, LLC
- Neptune Memorial Reef
- Neptune Society/Trident Society/Neptune Society of Northern California
- National Cremation
- Rose Hills Memorial Park
Notable properties
[edit]- Caballero Rivero Woodlawn Park North Cemetery and Mausoleum in Miami
- Crown Hill Funeral Home and Cemetery in Indianapolis
- Frank E. Campbell Funeral Chapel in Manhattan, New York City[13]
- Glenwood Memorial Gardens, Broomall, Pennsylvania
- Greenwood/Memory Lawn Mortuary & Cemetery in Phoenix, Arizona
- Joseph Gawler's Sons in Washington, D.C.
- Lake Lawn Metairie Funeral Home and Cemeteries in New Orleans
- Pierce Brothers Mortuary in Los Angeles
- Riverside Memorial Chapel in Manhattan, New York City
- Sparkman-Hillcrest Memorial Park Cemetery in Dallas
- Westwood Village Memorial Park in Westwood, Los Angeles, California
- Woodlawn Memorial Park Cemetery in Colma, California
Controversies
[edit]Costs
[edit]Writing in an October 24, 2013, issue of Bloomberg Businessweek, journalist Paul M. Barrett found, despite its lower overhead, SCI has higher prices than independent funeral home operators. Barrett quoted "data compiled" by a "'concierge' funeral planning service" Everest Funeral Package, which found that for "traditional funerals, SCI charges US$6,256 on average (excluding casket and cemetery plot), 42 percent more than independents."[14] In reply, SCI points to "overwhelmingly positive responses" on customer surveys and states they provide "top value" at a variety of funeral price points.[14]
Texas
[edit]In the late 1990s, SCI was involved in a controversy involving alleged violations of Texas State embalming laws. The proceedings took a political slant due to Robert Waltrip's friendship with the family of then-governor George W. Bush and Waltrip's campaign contributions to various members of the Bush family.[15]
Referred to as "Funeralgate" or "Formaldegate" in the media, the controversy was widely publicized when Eliza May, a director with the Texas Funeral Service Commission (TFSC), was fired while investigating SCI. May alleged in a civil suit that she was fired because she refused to halt her investigation despite pressure to do so from Governor Bush.
May's lawyers subpoenaed President Bush to testify at the trial,[16] but Texas judge John K. Dietz threw out the subpoena on the grounds that the then-governor was not in a position to have enough specialized information to require his involvement.[17]
The lawsuit was settled in 2001 for more than US$200,000 (equivalent to US$344,146 in 2023). SCI and the state of Texas were required to jointly pay the decision.[18] On January 23, 2004, the TFSC fined SCI an additional US$21,000 for administrative penalties.[18]
Florida
[edit]On January 18, 2023, it was reported on local news that the Escambia County Sheriffs Office was called to investigate a crime of corpse abuse by an employee who was caught in the act, by another employee. The alleged criminal was never charged with the crime because he committed suicide the same day. The investigation into the crime and the Oaklawn Funeral Home is still pending.
In 2001, it was reported that employees of the Memorial Gardens cemetery near Fort Lauderdale, Florida, had oversold the cemetery, so bodies were buried in the wrong places, separating husbands from wives; vaults were cracked open by a backhoe, bodies were exhumed, with bones, skulls and shrouds thrown into nearby woods, bodies were stacked on top of each other, and remains were relocated without notifying relatives.
The allegations were particularly appalling to the Jewish cemetery's more religiously observant customers, The Miami Herald reported. Traditional Jewish law requires bodies to be buried intact and prohibits disturbing the dead.[19] SCI reached a US$14 million agreement with the Florida attorney general's office in 2003 that required it to repair plots and reorganize the cemeteries to ensure all graves were properly marked and the grounds could accommodate all plots sold. SCI also settled a separate class-action lawsuit on behalf of 350 families for US$100 million.[20]
Virginia
[edit]On April 26, 2007, The Washington Post reported that an SCI cemetery in Alexandria, Virginia, had improperly buried the remains of the stillborn daughter of Nsombi Hale in a grave too shallow (in a grave about 8 inches (20 cm) deep). Nsombi Hale was filing suit against SCI.[21]
After an internal investigation by SCI, attorneys working for SCI denied the charges against the company in a letter to Virginia funeral regulators,[22] and a few days later, the Post reported that Robert Ranghelli, one of the SCI employees who had corroborated the initial reports of improper handing of corpses, was fired for "exercising his first amendment rights/speaking with the media" after having been on administrative leave for several months following the initial reports in the newspaper.[23]
On April 5, 2009, The Washington Post reported that the National Funeral Home, a facility owned by SCI in the Falls Church area of Fairfax County, Virginia, which also acts as a centralized embalming and dressing station for embalming and body preparation for other nearby SCI-owned operations (Arlington Funeral Home, Danzansky-Goldberg Memorial Chapel, and Demaine Funeral Home), was storing naked bodies in various stages of decomposition in conditions described as "disgusting, degrading and humiliating". The story went on to report that as many as 200 bodies were stored on "makeshift gurneys in the garage" and "at least half a dozen veterans destined for the hallowed ground at Arlington National Cemetery were left in their coffins on a garage rack". The Post reported that documentation describing these conditions had been reported to the Virginia Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers.[24]
A few days later, the Post reported that family members of a deceased Army veteran whose remains were stored in an unrefrigerated garage at National Funeral Home asked the Fairfax County Commonwealth's Attorney to investigate the actions of National and its parent company, SCI, as crimes.[24]
The Post further reported that the family of retired U.S. Army Colonel Andrew DeGraff filed a lawsuit in Fairfax County alleging that SCI mishandled DeGraff's remains. According to the article, an SCI spokesman said that the company is conducting an internal investigation.[25]
California
[edit]On September 14, 2009, a class-action lawsuit was filed against SCI and Eden Memorial Park, a Jewish cemetery managed by SCI in Mission Hills charging that they were destroying graves to make room for new interments.[26]
The Los Angeles Times reported that state officials found no evidence of mass grave disturbances. Russ Heimerich, a spokesman for the state Department of Consumer Affairs, said, "We have not seen any evidence of the kind of massive desecration that is being alleged. The kind of activity they're alleging is not easily hidden, especially on a willful, large-scale basis." The plaintiff's attorney rejected the findings of the state's investigation.
Michael Avenatti, the plaintiff's attorney, said more than 800 families have joined the class action suit. Avenatti claims the state's investigation was shoddy, saying, "Investigators from the state were told by various groundskeepers over a year ago that they had been repeatedly told to throw bones away, and yet for some reason, the state didn't adequately follow up."
SCI denied all charges. After the lawsuit was filed, the Consumer Affairs Department reviewed five to six years of the cemetery's annual inspection records and found no indication that graves had been disturbed. According to the Los Angeles Times article, "The agency also asked the dozens of families that contacted officials to look for signs of disturbances — shifted or cracked gravestones or anything else that appeared different from previous visits — and didn't receive a single call back, he said."[27]
In January 2012, the lawsuit against Eden Memorial Park was ruled to be a valid class action in Los Angeles Superior Court, with the trial scheduled to begin in May 2012. In February 2014, the parties reached a settlement in the amount of US$80.5 million.[28]
In 2015, families filed a second suit alleging that the practice continued after the first settlement.[29] The suit remains pending as of 2020[update].
In 2024, the attorney general of California announced a settlement with SCI, which does business in the state under their Neptune Society and Trident Society brands, for state enforcement actions that alleged that SCI had violated the California Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law by engaging in false and deceptive advertising in the marketing and sale of pre-need cremation packages. The proposed settlement which is pending court approval, would provide full restitution to customers, comprehensive injunctive relief, and $23 million in civil penalties.[30]
Massachusetts
[edit]In 2010, the State Board of Registration charged the SCI-owned Stanetsky Chapel, a Jewish funeral home in Brookline with serious violations of state law and regulations in connection with an incident where a woman was buried in the wrong grave, then disinterred without a legal permit and reburied in the correct grave with the woman's family not being notified of the mistake and the corrective procedure. As a result, in December 2011, the State Board announced a Consent Agreement and levied the biggest fine in its history, US$18,000, against Stanetsky and SCI, and suspended the license of the Stanetsky general manager for a year. Other staff members involved in the incident were subject to punitive actions ranging from additional professional training to license revocation. The incident received widespread local media coverage. The Board's action was also published on its website.[31]
In a case first reported on April 7, 2005, The Boston Globe reported J.S. Waterman's & Sons, also owned by SCI, was found by the Board to have accidentally cremated the body of a stillborn infant in 2003. The infant's body was apparently placed on a gurney that held an adult woman's body that was scheduled for cremation. As a result of a civil suit brought by the infant's family, Waterman's was ordered to pay the parents US$325,000 (equivalent to US$459,923 in 2023), with a pending legal claim that the mortuary violated the state's consumer protection law that could triple the damages, The Boston Globe reported. The family's lawyer, Gordon T. Walker, said SCI could be hit with additional costs, as there is a pending claim that the company violated the state's consumer protection law. The civil verdict was made in Suffolk Superior Court on March 4, 2008. The jury awarded US$75,000 because of emotional distress and US$250,000 because it found the funeral home was negligent and intentionally inflicted emotional harm.[32]
References
[edit]- ^ a b "About". SCI. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ a b "Service Corporation International Announces Fourth Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides 2022 Guidance". SCI. PR Newswire. 2022-02-14. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Form 10-K: Service Corporation International (2021)". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2022-02-15. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Service Corp. International". Fortune. 2022-05-23. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Our Boundaries". Neartown Association. Archived from the original on 2019-03-22. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Contact Us". SCI. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Ille, Nicholas V. (2020-05-10). "Who is Service Corporation International?". US Funerals Online. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Form 10-K: Service Corporation International (1999)". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2000-03-30. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Dignity Memorial Extends Network by Nearly 600 Locations". Houston Chronicle. PR Newswire. 2007-07-17. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "History". SCI. Archived from the original on 2007-09-03. Retrieved 2007-08-29.
- ^ a b "FTC Puts Conditions on Service Corporation International's Proposed $1.4 Billion Acquisition of Rival Funeral and Cemetery Services Provider". Federal Trade Commission (Press release). 2013-12-23. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ "Our Brands". SCI. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Jaynes, Gregory (1988-06-08). "90 Subdued Years Of Funerals For the Famous". The New York Times. p. B1. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ a b Barrett, Paul M. (2013-10-24). "Is Funeral Home Chain SCI's Growth Coming at the Expense of Mourners?". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on 2013-10-27. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Bryce, Robert (1999-08-20). "Who is Eliza May?". Salon. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Bryce, Robert (1999-07-21). "The Texas way of death". Salon. Archived from the original on 2007-06-25. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Duggan, Paul (1999-08-30). "Bush Need Not Testify, Judge Rules". The Washington Post. Austin, Texas (published 1999-08-31). p. A2. Archived from the original on 2013-07-07. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ a b Bryce, Robert (2004-05-14). "Final Disposition: The Texas Funeral Service Commission is up to its ashes in trouble again". Austin Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2013-01-17.
- ^ "Gruesome Photos, Video Show Bodies Discarded in Woods Behind Cemetery". Fox News. Associated Press. 2015-01-13. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Barrett, Paul M. (2014-02-28). "Huge Funeral Chain Settles Graveyard Desecration Suit, Buries Financial Details". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ White, Josh (2009-04-26). "Too Shallow a Hole to Bury a Baby". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2013-02-09. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ White, Josh (2009-07-02). "Falls Church Funeral Home Denies Mishandling Bodies". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2013-02-05. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ White, Josh (2009-07-07). "Funeral Worker Who Alleged Violations Is Fired". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2013-02-09. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ a b White, Josh (2009-04-05). "Funeral Home Employees Say Bodies Were Mishandled". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2013-02-09. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ White, Josh (2009-04-15). "Family Sues Funeral Home That Left Body in Garage". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2013-02-09. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Boudreau, Abbie; Zamost, Scott (2009-09-11). "California cemetery accused of desecrating remains". CNN. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Kim, Victoria (2009-11-13). "State officials find no evidence of mass grave desecration in Valley". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Moshtaghian, Artemis (2014-02-27). "California cemetery agrees to $80 million settlement over desecrating remains". CNN. Archived from the original on 2014-03-05. Retrieved 2022-05-26. Alt URL
- ^ Abram, Susan (2015-03-07). "Jewish cemetery Eden Memorial Park sued again for throwing out remains". Los Angeles Daily News. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Hernandez, David (2024-05-01). "Biggest funeral company in U.S. to pay huge sum to settle California suit over cremation services". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2024-05-01.
- ^ Applebaum, Teddy (2011-12-21). "Brookline funeral home fined for burial mix up". Wicked Local. Archived from the original on 2022-05-26. Retrieved 2022-05-26.
- ^ Ellement, John R. (2008-03-05). "Jury faults mortuary for losing remains". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2022-05-26.