Homotopy colimit and limit: Difference between revisions
m →Homotopy colimit: switched utf-8 deltas to named character references |
KMaster888 (talk | contribs) ce |
||
(37 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Concepts in algebraic topology}} |
|||
{{Expert |
{{Expert needed|mathematics|talk=Poor quality|date=June 2014}} |
||
{{TOCright}} |
|||
In [[mathematics]], especially in [[algebraic topology]], the '''homotopy limit and colimit''' are variants of the notions of [[limit (category theory)|limit]] and colimit. They are denoted by holim and hocolim, respectively. |
|||
In [[mathematics]], especially in [[algebraic topology]], the '''homotopy limit and colimit<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Dugger|first=Daniel|date=|title=A Primer on Homotopy Colimits|url=https://pages.uoregon.edu/ddugger/hocolim.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203225718/https://pages.uoregon.edu/ddugger/hocolim.pdf|archive-date=3 Dec 2020|access-date=|website=}}</ref>'''<sup>pg 52</sup> are variants of the notions of [[limit (category theory)|limit]] and colimit extended to the homotopy category <math>\text{Ho}(\textbf{Top})</math>. The main idea is this: if we have a diagram<blockquote><math>F: I \to \textbf{Top}</math></blockquote>considered as an object in the [[homotopy category of diagrams]] <math>F \in \text{Ho}(\textbf{Top}^I)</math>, (where the homotopy equivalence of diagrams is considered pointwise), then the homotopy limit and colimits then correspond to the [[Limit (category theory)|cone]] and cocone<blockquote><math>\begin{align} |
|||
\underset{\leftarrow I}{\text{Holim}}(F)&: * \to \textbf{Top}\\ |
|||
\underset{\rightarrow I}{\text{Hocolim}}(F)&: * \to \textbf{Top} |
|||
\end{align}</math></blockquote>which are objects in the homotopy category <math>\text{Ho}(\textbf{Top}^*)</math>, where <math>*</math> is the category with one object and one morphism. Note this category is equivalent to the standard homotopy category <math>\text{Ho}(\textbf{Top})</math> since the latter homotopy functor category has functors which picks out an object in <math>\text{Top}</math> and a natural transformation corresponds to a continuous function of topological spaces. Note this construction can be generalized to [[model categories]], which give techniques for constructing homotopy limits and colimits in terms of other homotopy categories, such as [[Derived category|derived categories]]. Another perspective formalizing these kinds of constructions are [[derivator]]s<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Grothendieck|date=|title=Pursuing Stacks|url=https://thescrivener.github.io/PursuingStacks/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200730015735/https://thescrivener.github.io/PursuingStacks/ps-online.pdf|archive-date=30 Jul 2020|access-date=2020-09-17|website=thescrivener.github.io}}</ref><sup>pg 193</sup> which are a new framework for [[homotopical algebra]]. |
|||
==Introductory examples== |
==Introductory examples== |
||
===Homotopy pushout=== |
===Homotopy pushout=== |
||
The concept of homotopy colimit is a generalization of ''homotopy pushouts''. This notion is motivated by the following observation: the (ordinary) [[pushout (category theory)|pushout]] |
The concept of homotopy colimit'''<ref name=":1" />'''<sup>pg 4-8</sup> is a generalization of ''homotopy pushouts'', such as the [[mapping cylinder]] used to define a [[cofibration]]. This notion is motivated by the following observation: the (ordinary) [[pushout (category theory)|pushout]] |
||
:<math>D^n \sqcup_{S^{n-1}} pt</math> |
:<math>D^n \sqcup_{S^{n-1}} pt</math> |
||
is the space obtained by contracting the ''n'' |
is the space obtained by contracting the (''n''−1)-sphere (which is the boundary of the ''n''-dimensional disk) to a single point. This space is [[homeomorphic]] to the ''n''-sphere S<sup>''n''</sup>. On the other hand, the pushout |
||
:<math>pt \sqcup_{S^{n-1}} pt</math> |
:<math>pt \sqcup_{S^{n-1}} pt</math> |
||
is a point. Therefore, even though the ([[contractible space|contractible]]) disk ''D''<sup>''n''</sup> was replaced by a point, (which is homotopy equivalent to the disk), the two pushouts are ''not'' [[homotopy equivalence|homotopy]] (or [[weak equivalence|weakly]]) equivalent. |
is a point. Therefore, even though the ([[contractible space|contractible]]) disk ''D''<sup>''n''</sup> was replaced by a point, (which is homotopy equivalent to the disk), the two pushouts are ''not'' [[homotopy equivalence|homotopy]] (or [[weak equivalence (homotopy theory)|weakly]]) equivalent. |
||
Therefore, the pushout is not well-aligned with a principle of homotopy theory, which considers weakly equivalent spaces as carrying the same information: if one (or more) of the spaces used to form the pushout is replaced by a weakly equivalent space, the pushout is not guaranteed to stay weakly equivalent. The homotopy pushout |
Therefore, the pushout is not well-aligned with a principle of homotopy theory, which considers weakly equivalent spaces as carrying the same information: if one (or more) of the spaces used to form the pushout is replaced by a weakly equivalent space, the pushout is not guaranteed to stay weakly equivalent. The homotopy pushout rectifies this defect. |
||
The ''homotopy pushout'' of two maps <math>A \leftarrow B \rightarrow C</math> of topological spaces is defined as |
The ''homotopy pushout'' of two maps <math>A \leftarrow B \rightarrow C</math> of topological spaces is defined as |
||
:<math>A \ |
:<math>A \sqcup_1 B \times [0,1] \sqcup_0 B \sqcup_1 B \times [0,1] \sqcup_0 C</math>, |
||
i.e., instead of glueing ''B'' in both ''A'' and ''C'', two copies of a [[Cylinder (geometry)|cylinder]] on ''B'' are glued together and their ends are glued to ''A'' and ''C''. |
i.e., instead of glueing ''B'' in both ''A'' and ''C'', two copies of a [[Cylinder (geometry)|cylinder]] on ''B'' are glued together and their ends are glued to ''A'' and ''C''. |
||
For example, the homotopy colimit of the diagram (whose maps are projections) |
For example, the homotopy colimit of the diagram (whose maps are projections) |
||
Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
It can be shown that the homotopy pushout does not share the defect of the ordinary pushout: replacing ''A'', ''B'' and / or ''C'' by a homotopic space, the homotopy pushout ''will'' also be homotopic. In this sense, the homotopy pushouts treats homotopic spaces as well as the (ordinary) pushout does with homeomorphic spaces. |
It can be shown that the homotopy pushout does not share the defect of the ordinary pushout: replacing ''A'', ''B'' and / or ''C'' by a homotopic space, the homotopy pushout ''will'' also be homotopic. In this sense, the homotopy pushouts treats homotopic spaces as well as the (ordinary) pushout does with homeomorphic spaces. |
||
=== Composition of maps === |
|||
Another useful and motivating examples of a homotopy colimit is constructing models for the homotopy colimit of the diagram<blockquote><math>A \xrightarrow{f} X \xrightarrow{g} Y</math></blockquote>of topological spaces. There are a number of ways to model this colimit: the first is to consider the space<blockquote><math>\left[ |
|||
(A\times I)\coprod (X\times I) \coprod Y |
|||
\right] / \sim</math></blockquote>where <math>\sim </math> is the equivalence relation identifying<blockquote><math>\begin{align} |
|||
(a,1) &\sim (f(a),0) \\ |
|||
(x,1) &\sim g(x) |
|||
\end{align}</math></blockquote>which can pictorially be described as the picture<blockquote>[[File:Homotopy colimit A-X-Y.png|frameless|205x205px]]</blockquote>Because we can similarly interpret the diagram above as the commutative diagram, from properties of categories, we get a commutative diagram<blockquote>[[File:Composition diagram of spaces.svg|frameless|117x117px]]</blockquote>giving a homotopy colimit. We could guess this looks like<blockquote>[[File:Homotopy colimit composition not filled in.png|frameless|206x206px]]</blockquote>but notice we have introduced a new cycle to fill in the new data of the composition. This creates a technical problem which can be solved using simplicial techniques: giving a method for constructing a model for homotopy colimits. The new diagram, forming the homotopy colimit of the composition diagram pictorially is represented as<blockquote>[[File:Homotopy colimit with composition filled in.png|frameless|195x195px]]</blockquote>giving another model of the homotopy colimit which is homotopy equivalent to the original diagram (without the composition of <math>g\circ f</math>) given above. |
|||
===Mapping telescope=== |
===Mapping telescope=== |
||
The homotopy colimit of a sequence of spaces |
The homotopy colimit of a sequence of spaces |
||
:<math>X_1 \to X_2 \to \cdots,</math> |
:<math>X_1 \to X_2 \to \cdots,</math> |
||
is the [[mapping telescope]].<ref>Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, 4.G.</ref> |
is the [[mapping telescope]].<ref>Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, 4.G.</ref> One example computation is taking the homotopy colimit of a sequence of [[cofibration]]s. The colimit of '''<ref name=":1" />'''<sup>pg 62</sup> this diagram gives a homotopy colimit. This implies we could compute the homotopy colimit of any mapping telescope by replacing the maps with cofibrations. |
||
==General definition== |
==General definition== |
||
===Homotopy limit=== |
===Homotopy limit=== |
||
Treating examples such as the mapping telescope and the homotopy pushout on an equal footing can be achieved by considering an {{mvar|I}}-diagram of spaces, where {{mvar|I}} is some "indexing" category. This is |
Treating examples such as the mapping telescope and the homotopy pushout on an equal footing can be achieved by considering an {{mvar|I}}-diagram of spaces, where {{mvar|I}} is some "indexing" [[Category (mathematics)|category]]. This is a [[functor]] |
||
:<math>X: I \to Spaces,</math> |
:<math>X: I \to Spaces,</math> |
||
i.e., to each object {{mvar|i}} in {{mvar|I}}, one assigns a space {{math|''X''<sub>''i''</sub>}} and maps between them, according to the maps in {{mvar|I}}. The category of such diagrams is denoted {{math|''Spaces''<sup>''I''</sup>}}. |
i.e., to each object {{mvar|i}} in {{mvar|I}}, one assigns a space {{math|''X''<sub>''i''</sub>}} and maps between them, according to the maps in {{mvar|I}}. The category of such diagrams is denoted {{math|''Spaces''<sup>''I''</sup>}}. |
||
Line 40: | Line 51: | ||
which sends a space {{mvar|X}} to the {{mvar|I}}-diagram which at some object {{mvar|i}} gives |
which sends a space {{mvar|X}} to the {{mvar|I}}-diagram which at some object {{mvar|i}} gives |
||
:<math>X \times |N(I / i)|</math> |
:<math>X \times |N(I / i)|</math> |
||
Here {{math|''I''/''i''}} is the [[slice category]] (its objects are arrows {{math|''j'' → ''i''}}, where {{mvar|j}} is any object of {{mvar|I}}, {{mvar|N}} is the [[nerve (category theory)|nerve]] of this category and |-| is the topological realization of this [[simplicial set]].<ref>Bousfield & Kan: ''Homotopy limits, Completions and Localizations'', Springer, LNM 304. Section XI.3.3</ref> |
Here {{math|''I''/''i''}} is the [[slice category]] (its objects are arrows {{math|''j'' → ''i''}}, where {{mvar|j}} is any object of {{mvar|I}}), {{mvar|N}} is the [[nerve (category theory)|nerve]] of this category and |-| is the topological realization of this [[simplicial set]].<ref>Bousfield & Kan: ''Homotopy limits, Completions and Localizations'', Springer, LNM 304. Section XI.3.3</ref> |
||
===Homotopy colimit=== |
===Homotopy colimit=== |
||
Similarly, one can define a colimit as the ''left'' adjoint to the diagonal functor {{math|Δ<sub>0</sub>}} given above. To define a homotopy colimit, we must modify {{math|Δ<sub>0</sub>}} in a different way |
Similarly, one can define a colimit as the ''left'' adjoint to the diagonal functor {{math|Δ<sub>0</sub>}} given above. To define a homotopy colimit, we must modify {{math|Δ<sub>0</sub>}} in a different way. A homotopy colimit can be defined as the left adjoint to a functor {{math|Δ : ''Spaces'' → ''Spaces''<sup>''I''</sup>}} where |
||
:{{ |
:{{math|Δ(''X'')(''i'') {{=}} Hom<sub>''Spaces''</sub> ({{mabs|''N''(''I''<sup>op</sup> /''i'')}}, ''X'')}}, |
||
where {{math|''I''<sup>op</sup>}} is the [[opposite category]] of {{mvar|I}}. Although this is not the same as the functor {{math|Δ}} above, it does share the property that if the geometric realization of the nerve category ({{math|{{mabs|''N''(-)}}}}) is replaced with a point space, we recover the original functor {{math|Δ<sub>0</sub>}}. |
|||
== Examples == |
|||
A '''homotopy pullback''' (or '''homotopy fiber-product''') is the dual concept of a homotopy pushout.{{citation needed span|It satisfies the universal property of a pullback up to homotopy.|date=August 2022}} Concretely, given <math>f : X \to Z</math> and <math>g : Y \to Z</math>, it can be constructed as |
|||
:<math>X \times^h_Z Y := X \times_Z Z^I \times_Z Y = \{ (x, \gamma, y) | f(x) = \gamma(0), g(y) = \gamma(1) \}.</math><ref name="homotopy pullback">[https://www.home.uni-osnabrueck.de/mfrankland/Math527/Math527_0308.pdf Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Homotopy pullbacks] </ref> |
|||
For example, the [[homotopy fiber]] of <math>f : X \to Y</math> over a point ''y'' is the homotopy pullback of <math>f</math> along <math>y \hookrightarrow Y</math>.<ref name="homotopy pullback" /> The homotopy pullback of <math>f</math> along the identity is nothing but the [[mapping path space]] of <math>f</math>. |
|||
The universal property of a homotopy pullback yields the natural map <math>X \times_Z Y \to X \times^h_Z Y</math>, a special case of a natural map from a limit to a homotopy limit. In the case of a homotopy fiber, this map is an inclusion of a fiber to a homotopy fiber. |
|||
== Construction of colimits with simplicial replacements == |
|||
Given a small category <math>I</math> and a diagram <math>D:I \to \textbf{Top}</math>, we can construct the homotopy colimit using a '''simplicial replacement''' of the diagram. This is a simplicial space, <math>\text{srep}(D)_\bullet</math> given by the diagram'''<ref name=":1" />'''<sup>pg 16-17</sup><blockquote>[[File:Simplicial replacement of a diagram.svg|frameless|502x502px]] </blockquote>where<blockquote><math>\text{srep}(D)_n = \underset{i_0 \leftarrow i_1 \leftarrow \cdots \leftarrow i_n}{\coprod}D(i_n)</math></blockquote>given by chains of composable maps in the indexing category <math>I</math>. Then, the homotopy colimit of <math>D</math> can be constructed as the geometric realization of this simplicial space, so<blockquote><math>\underset{\to}{\text{hocolim}}D = |\text{srep}(D)_\bullet|</math></blockquote>Notice that this agrees with the picture given above for the composition diagram of <math>A \to X \to Y</math>. |
|||
==Relation to the (ordinary) colimit and limit== |
==Relation to the (ordinary) colimit and limit== |
||
Line 54: | Line 76: | ||
==Further examples and applications== |
==Further examples and applications== |
||
Just as limit is used to [[Completion (ring theory)|complete]] a ring, holim is used to [[completion of a spectrum|complete a spectrum]]. |
Just as limit is used to [[Completion (ring theory)|complete]] a ring, holim is used to [[completion of a spectrum|complete a spectrum]]. |
||
== See also == |
|||
* [[Derivator]] |
|||
*[[Homotopy fiber]] |
|||
*[[Homotopy cofiber]] |
|||
* [[Cohomology of categories]] |
|||
* [[Spectral sequence of homotopy colimits]] |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{Reflist}} |
|||
<references /> |
|||
*[https://pages.uoregon.edu/ddugger/hocolim.pdf A Primer on Homotopy Colimits] |
|||
*Hatcher, ''Algebraic Topology'' |
|||
*[https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mathematical-proceedings-of-the-cambridge-philosophical-society/article/abs/homotopy-colimits-in-the-category-of-small-categories/32ACB453B263410CE1643E682D7DE335 Homotopy colimits in the category of small categories] |
|||
*[[arxiv:1810.06632|Categories and Orbispaces]] |
|||
*{{Hatcher AT}} |
|||
== Further reading == |
== Further reading == |
||
* |
*[https://mathoverflow.net/q/135462 Homotopy limit-colimit diagrams in stable model categories] |
||
*[https://www.math.ucla.edu/~mikehill/Research/surv-douglas2-201.pdf pg.80 Homotopy Colimits and Limits] |
|||
[[Category:Homotopy theory]] |
[[Category:Homotopy theory]] |
||
[[Category:Category theory]] |
|||
[[Category:Homotopical algebra]] |
Latest revision as of 17:44, 13 December 2024
This article needs attention from an expert in mathematics. See the talk page for details. (June 2014) |
In mathematics, especially in algebraic topology, the homotopy limit and colimit[1]pg 52 are variants of the notions of limit and colimit extended to the homotopy category . The main idea is this: if we have a diagram
considered as an object in the homotopy category of diagrams , (where the homotopy equivalence of diagrams is considered pointwise), then the homotopy limit and colimits then correspond to the cone and cocone
which are objects in the homotopy category , where is the category with one object and one morphism. Note this category is equivalent to the standard homotopy category since the latter homotopy functor category has functors which picks out an object in and a natural transformation corresponds to a continuous function of topological spaces. Note this construction can be generalized to model categories, which give techniques for constructing homotopy limits and colimits in terms of other homotopy categories, such as derived categories. Another perspective formalizing these kinds of constructions are derivators[2]pg 193 which are a new framework for homotopical algebra.
Introductory examples
[edit]Homotopy pushout
[edit]The concept of homotopy colimit[1]pg 4-8 is a generalization of homotopy pushouts, such as the mapping cylinder used to define a cofibration. This notion is motivated by the following observation: the (ordinary) pushout
is the space obtained by contracting the (n−1)-sphere (which is the boundary of the n-dimensional disk) to a single point. This space is homeomorphic to the n-sphere Sn. On the other hand, the pushout
is a point. Therefore, even though the (contractible) disk Dn was replaced by a point, (which is homotopy equivalent to the disk), the two pushouts are not homotopy (or weakly) equivalent.
Therefore, the pushout is not well-aligned with a principle of homotopy theory, which considers weakly equivalent spaces as carrying the same information: if one (or more) of the spaces used to form the pushout is replaced by a weakly equivalent space, the pushout is not guaranteed to stay weakly equivalent. The homotopy pushout rectifies this defect.
The homotopy pushout of two maps of topological spaces is defined as
- ,
i.e., instead of glueing B in both A and C, two copies of a cylinder on B are glued together and their ends are glued to A and C. For example, the homotopy colimit of the diagram (whose maps are projections)
is the join .
It can be shown that the homotopy pushout does not share the defect of the ordinary pushout: replacing A, B and / or C by a homotopic space, the homotopy pushout will also be homotopic. In this sense, the homotopy pushouts treats homotopic spaces as well as the (ordinary) pushout does with homeomorphic spaces.
Composition of maps
[edit]Another useful and motivating examples of a homotopy colimit is constructing models for the homotopy colimit of the diagram
of topological spaces. There are a number of ways to model this colimit: the first is to consider the space
where is the equivalence relation identifying
which can pictorially be described as the picture
Because we can similarly interpret the diagram above as the commutative diagram, from properties of categories, we get a commutative diagram
giving a homotopy colimit. We could guess this looks like
but notice we have introduced a new cycle to fill in the new data of the composition. This creates a technical problem which can be solved using simplicial techniques: giving a method for constructing a model for homotopy colimits. The new diagram, forming the homotopy colimit of the composition diagram pictorially is represented as
giving another model of the homotopy colimit which is homotopy equivalent to the original diagram (without the composition of ) given above.
Mapping telescope
[edit]The homotopy colimit of a sequence of spaces
is the mapping telescope.[3] One example computation is taking the homotopy colimit of a sequence of cofibrations. The colimit of [1]pg 62 this diagram gives a homotopy colimit. This implies we could compute the homotopy colimit of any mapping telescope by replacing the maps with cofibrations.
General definition
[edit]Homotopy limit
[edit]Treating examples such as the mapping telescope and the homotopy pushout on an equal footing can be achieved by considering an I-diagram of spaces, where I is some "indexing" category. This is a functor
i.e., to each object i in I, one assigns a space Xi and maps between them, according to the maps in I. The category of such diagrams is denoted SpacesI.
There is a natural functor called the diagonal,
which sends any space X to the diagram which consists of X everywhere (and the identity of X as maps between them). In (ordinary) category theory, the right adjoint to this functor is the limit. The homotopy limit is defined by altering this situation: it is the right adjoint to
which sends a space X to the I-diagram which at some object i gives
Here I/i is the slice category (its objects are arrows j → i, where j is any object of I), N is the nerve of this category and |-| is the topological realization of this simplicial set.[4]
Homotopy colimit
[edit]Similarly, one can define a colimit as the left adjoint to the diagonal functor Δ0 given above. To define a homotopy colimit, we must modify Δ0 in a different way. A homotopy colimit can be defined as the left adjoint to a functor Δ : Spaces → SpacesI where
- Δ(X)(i) = HomSpaces (|N(Iop /i)|, X),
where Iop is the opposite category of I. Although this is not the same as the functor Δ above, it does share the property that if the geometric realization of the nerve category (|N(-)|) is replaced with a point space, we recover the original functor Δ0.
Examples
[edit]A homotopy pullback (or homotopy fiber-product) is the dual concept of a homotopy pushout.It satisfies the universal property of a pullback up to homotopy.[citation needed] Concretely, given and , it can be constructed as
For example, the homotopy fiber of over a point y is the homotopy pullback of along .[5] The homotopy pullback of along the identity is nothing but the mapping path space of .
The universal property of a homotopy pullback yields the natural map , a special case of a natural map from a limit to a homotopy limit. In the case of a homotopy fiber, this map is an inclusion of a fiber to a homotopy fiber.
Construction of colimits with simplicial replacements
[edit]Given a small category and a diagram , we can construct the homotopy colimit using a simplicial replacement of the diagram. This is a simplicial space, given by the diagram[1]pg 16-17
where
given by chains of composable maps in the indexing category . Then, the homotopy colimit of can be constructed as the geometric realization of this simplicial space, so
Notice that this agrees with the picture given above for the composition diagram of .
Relation to the (ordinary) colimit and limit
[edit]There is always a map
Typically, this map is not a weak equivalence. For example, the homotopy pushout encountered above always maps to the ordinary pushout. This map is not typically a weak equivalence, for example the join is not weakly equivalent to the pushout of , which is a point.
Further examples and applications
[edit]Just as limit is used to complete a ring, holim is used to complete a spectrum.
See also
[edit]- Derivator
- Homotopy fiber
- Homotopy cofiber
- Cohomology of categories
- Spectral sequence of homotopy colimits
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Dugger, Daniel. "A Primer on Homotopy Colimits" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 Dec 2020.
- ^ Grothendieck. "Pursuing Stacks". thescrivener.github.io. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 Jul 2020. Retrieved 2020-09-17.
- ^ Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, 4.G.
- ^ Bousfield & Kan: Homotopy limits, Completions and Localizations, Springer, LNM 304. Section XI.3.3
- ^ a b Math 527 - Homotopy Theory Homotopy pullbacks
- A Primer on Homotopy Colimits
- Homotopy colimits in the category of small categories
- Categories and Orbispaces
- Hatcher, Allen (2002), Algebraic Topology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-79540-0.