Jump to content

Talk:Alkane: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up per WP:TPL using AWB (9724)
Missing section: new section
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
|currentstatus=FGAN
|currentstatus=FGAN
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Chemistry|importance=Top|class=B|peer-review=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|
{{WikiProject Chemistry|importance=Top}}
}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
|archiveprefix=Talk:Alkane/archive
|archiveprefix=Talk:Alkane/Archive
|format=%%i
|format= %%i
|age=730
|age=730
|index=yes
|index=yes
|archivebox=yes
|archivebox=yes
|header={{aan}}
|numberstart=1
}}
}}

== Missing section ==

Just removed an unmatched <nowiki><!--</nowiki> string from this page, instantly adding back in 7800 characters.
:A) I would appreciate if someone who knows something about chemistry could make sure those sections stood the test of time in their absence, and
:B) Does anyone know where I might report such an issue / help with a bot to catch such mistakes (unclosed comments)?
[[User:HegelianGenius|HegelianGenius]] ([[User talk:HegelianGenius|talk]]) 04:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:22, 14 December 2024

Former good article nomineeAlkane was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 28, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
June 2, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
February 10, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Missing section

[edit]

Just removed an unmatched <!-- string from this page, instantly adding back in 7800 characters.

A) I would appreciate if someone who knows something about chemistry could make sure those sections stood the test of time in their absence, and
B) Does anyone know where I might report such an issue / help with a bot to catch such mistakes (unclosed comments)?

HegelianGenius (talk) 04:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]