Talk:Alkane: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Missing section: new section |
|||
(45 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|currentstatus=FGAN |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes| |
||
{{WikiProject Chemistry|importance=Top}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |
||
|archiveprefix=Talk:Alkane/ |
|archiveprefix=Talk:Alkane/Archive |
||
|format=%%i |
|format= %%i |
||
|age=730 |
|age=730 |
||
|index=yes |
|index=yes |
||
|archivebox=yes |
|archivebox=yes |
||
|header={{aan}} |
|||
|numberstart=1 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== Missing section == |
|||
Just removed an unmatched <nowiki><!--</nowiki> string from this page, instantly adding back in 7800 characters. |
|||
:A) I would appreciate if someone who knows something about chemistry could make sure those sections stood the test of time in their absence, and |
|||
:B) Does anyone know where I might report such an issue / help with a bot to catch such mistakes (unclosed comments)? |
|||
[[User:HegelianGenius|HegelianGenius]] ([[User talk:HegelianGenius|talk]]) 04:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:22, 14 December 2024
Alkane was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
Missing section
[edit]Just removed an unmatched <!-- string from this page, instantly adding back in 7800 characters.
- A) I would appreciate if someone who knows something about chemistry could make sure those sections stood the test of time in their absence, and
- B) Does anyone know where I might report such an issue / help with a bot to catch such mistakes (unclosed comments)?