Jump to content

Talk:Hacker culture: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
(367 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
== ESR a hacker hero? ==
{{Talk header}}
I really hate wasting time bashing ESR, but he hasn't done too much a hacker would consider "heroic." Just because he maintains the Jargon File doesn't mean he's a hacker demi-god. Its more like the ESR File now than the Jargon File (twisted and evil), considering his centralized control over the File. Have you seen any slashdot topics relevant to ESR? The ratio is roughly 10 ESR pure unadulterated haters to 1 ESR apoligist who realizes that wasting time bashing ESR isn't going to cure the damage he has caused the community, and just wants to say something like "He's done some good things for the community. Lets move on to the topics we came to slashdot for." I acknoweldge that he's a decent spokesman for the open source software movement, but he does not represent hacker culture, and he is despised by basically all of it, with a few exceptions I'm sure. I personally could care less, and I really don't want to waste time on the foolishness of one man. I had hoped that this article could rise up as an unbiased Jargon File, but its basically a condensed version of it. I'll probably make some changes.
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=Low|security=yes|security-importance=high|free-software=yes|free-software-importance=low|software=yes}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Culture}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(90d)
| archive=Talk:Hacker culture/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=1
| maxarchivesize=75K
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadsleft=5
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
{{Broken anchors|links=
* <nowiki>[[palindrome#Music|palindromic]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Music) has been [[Special:Diff/567855311|deleted by other users]] before. <!-- {"title":"Music","appear":{"revid":156151905,"parentid":156151125,"timestamp":"2007-09-06T22:56:42Z","removed_section_titles":["Types of palindrome","Symmetry by characters","Symmetry by words","Symmetry by both words and characters","Symmetry by lines","In music","Names"],"added_section_titles":["Types","Characters","Words","Both words and characters","Lines","Music"]},"disappear":{"revid":567855311,"parentid":567416593,"timestamp":"2013-08-09T19:10:36Z","removed_section_titles":["Music"],"added_section_titles":[]}} -->
}}


==Wiki Education assignment: IFS213-Hacking and Open Source Culture, Fall 2024==
== [[Eric S. Raymond]]'s changes ==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Mesa_Community_College/IFS213-Hacking_and_Open_Source_Culture,_Fall_2024_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:AdamBarnette|AdamBarnette]] | reviewers = [[User:Casxy|Casxy]] | start_date = 2024-09-03 | end_date = 2024-12-13 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:MollyBN|MollyBN]] ([[User talk:MollyBN|talk]]) 02:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)</span>
Someone really needs to go back and revert the damage done by [[Eric_S._Raymond]]. He applied his bias to article. It was originally about the hacker culture that included all sides, not just open source. He went and changed it to open source removing all the other references and information that didn't fit his worldview. The changes are too big of a project for me to take, but I hope someone can properly seperate this out and make people from both hacker culture's happy without the opensource hacker culture editing the page and claiming to be the one true hacker culture.
:I'd say it is fair. ESR is maintainer of the [[Jargon File]], he is a demigod, and he knows about this in first person, and can quote sources on this. Anyway, hackerdom is closely connected with free-software movement today, and will probably be so for the foreseable future. --[[User:Vidarlo|vidar]][[User_talk:Vidarlo|lo]] 18:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
::Just because ESR is so involved with the Jargon File doesn't make him qualified to change the focus of the article. The only sources fit to quote are published, anyway, and if only ESR can access them, they're no good. [[User:ProfMoriarty|ProfMoriarty]] 21:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

== Big problems ==

I've got some really big problems with this and many of the other hacker pages. As the guy below points out, you are assuming your terminology is correct. There is the open source hacker subculture as well as the darker (bad word) hacker subculture. I just removed a section because it was wrong. There is a huge overlap in philosophy and membership. Both groups are filled with open source contributers and way too many libertarian thoughts. Even on the hacker page you list Steve Wozniak. Should we throw him into the darkside because he was a phreak? I know wikipedia is polluted by open source fanboys, but seriously, stop the bias. Stop assuming you know the one true hacker subculture. Stop assuming that your terms of seperating hacker/cracker should be accepted by all. Definitely mention the arguments. Explain them as a perspective, and then move on. Seperate out the pages. Have a page on the brighter side and the darker side, but stop assuming your perspective of the world applies to other people.


== Which Hacker culture? ==

This whole page is definitely along with the "hackers, not crackers" school of thought, which is no surprise given that it has been heavily editted by [[Eric_S._Raymond]]. The [[Hacker]] entry, although IMO slanted, at least gives multiple views to the definition of what a hacker is and who are the people that claim themselves as hackers.

:Should this page thus reflect the multiple facets of the definition of hacker with multiple views at what hacker cultures are? Or are the cultures around the alternative definitions to be driven down to an ESR-esque [[Cracker culture]] instead? --[[User:Golgo13|Golgo13]] 17:20, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

:As someone who just stumbled upon this article, I would say: If there are two hacker-cracker-whatever-cultures, then mention both of them. The introduction, explaining the distinction between hackers and so-called crackers, is quite good, but I can't understand why the rest of the page only describes one part of this culture? IMO, that is quite POV. -- 84.144.142.79, 2006-05-13 13:26:09

::Cracking isn't so much of a cultural facet; it is more of a societal problem (when the actions are clearly subversive). As such, an article on cracker culture (or the presentation of information about that into this article) seems preposterous. Note that there isn't an article on [[criminal culture]] or [[mafia culture]]. As for cracking that is not so subversive, it may deserve increased mention. --[[User:Abelani|Amit]] 07:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

== [[Free software]] movement ==

Shouldn't there be a mention of the free software movement in the introduction, after all it is evident in the GNU manifesto that stallman created GNU so as to bring back the hacker culture. (--[[User:Alexos|el magnifico]] 14:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC))

== Merge with UNIX culture ==

Doesn't it make more sense to say that UNIX is a product of the hacker culture for the most part? Ken Thompson and others who have worked on bringing UNIX to where it is today are strong examples of Hackers.

== Edit... fixed? ==

I think I killed the bias, not sure, tho

== documents section ==
The jargon file is the most important touchstone?! What kind of POV weirdness is that? Can we either get rid of this section or else expand it? I'd certainly add the GNU Manifesto, but I think that doesn't go nearly far enough; hacker culture is transmitted through a vast body of mostly-technical works (like TAOCP, SICP, etc,) and pieces of software like Emacs, not just these anthropological studies. And if we do want anthropological studies, certainly we should mention Steven Levy's book ''Hackers''. We would never say that the most important touchstone of "literary culture" is a dictionary or essay; hacker culture is similar. [[User:Phr|Phr]] 19:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

== Leet is not really a hacker creation ==

Leet is not usually part of what true hackers believe to be part of the culture. Handles yes, but leet is if anything seen as a debasement of the original ideals of hacking and is reserved for the lesser want to be script kiddies. I would eather put in a seperate section talking about hacker word play as there is the TLA (Three Letter Acronyms) puns and the jokes about the spelling of Micro$oft and the like. However Leet is used in a mocking fassion if at all.

:Reference to ''true hacker'' suggests you should read the '''[[hacker definition controversy]]''' piece. While I would agree Leet/l33t/1337 has no bearing to the '''technical''' aspects of hacking, and the earliest use I can find in Google groups is shortly after [[September that never ended|September never ended]], it's definitely a '''cultural''' artifact of a portion of the broadest view of the hacker subculture. Granted, it's not a portion of the subculture I like being associated with, even peripherally; however, I view it much the same as how by being an [[American]], I am associated with the [[Wingnut_%28politics%29|wingnuts]] on the [[Religious Right]]: it's part of the culture as a whole... just not one I like. <tt>&mdash; [[User:Abb3w|Abb3w]] 20:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)</tt>

Latest revision as of 08:38, 14 December 2024

Wiki Education assignment: IFS213-Hacking and Open Source Culture, Fall 2024

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AdamBarnette (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Casxy.

— Assignment last updated by MollyBN (talk) 02:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hacker_culture&oldid=1263032443"