Jump to content

.music: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
FusionSub (talk | contribs)
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Community-based top-level domain name}}
{{Copy edit|date=December 2020}}
{{Infobox top level domain
{{Infobox top level domain
|image = File:.MUSIC Logo.png
|logo = Dotmusic.JPG
|status = ICANN contracting with DotMusic Limited in progress
|status = ICANN Registry Agreement for .music was signed on May 4, 2021
|manager =
|manager =
|country =
|country =
|language =
|language =
|translation =
|translation =
|stringcontention = Yes
|registryprovider =
|registryprovider =
|registrations =
|registrations =
|date =
|date =
|intendeduse = [[Music]]
|intendeduse = [[music]]
|type = [[Niche TLD]]
|type = Community
|website = {{URL|https://music.us}}
|category= [[:Category: Media New gTLDs|Media]]
|category= [[:Category: Media New gTLDs|Media]]
|community =
|community =
|keypeople =
|keypeople = [[Constantine Roussos]]
|priority = 448 - [[DotMusic Limited]]<br>450 - [[Radix]] (DotMusic Inc.)<br>749 - [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]] (Entertainment Names Inc.)<br>838 - [[Amazon.com|Amazon]]<br>1557 - [[Far Further]] (.music LLC)<br>1634 - [[Donuts]] (Victor Cross)<br>1830 - [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Music Limited)<br>1907 - [[Google]] ([[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]])
|priority = 448 - [[DotMusic Limited]]<br>450 - [[Radix]] (DotMusic Inc.)<br>749 - [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]] (Entertainment Names Inc.)<br>838 - [[Amazon.com|Amazon]]<br>1557 - [[Far Further]] (.music LLC)<br>1634 - [[Donuts]] (Victor Cross)<br>1830 - [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Music Limited)<br>1907 - [[Google]] ([[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]])
}}
}}


'''.music''' is a [[TLD|top-level domain name]] (TLD) dedicated for the use of music dissemination and appreciation. It is one of the most highly contested [[New gTLD Program|new gTLDs]], with 8 competitive applications that were in contention.
'''.music''' is a community-based [[TLD|top-level domain name]] (TLD) operated for the benefit of the global music community. It was one of the most highly contested [[New gTLD Program|new gTLDs]], with eight applicants in contention.

On April 17, 2019, the .MUSIC registry, the [[International Federation of the Phonographic Industry]], [[Confédération Internationale des Sociétés d'Auteurs et Compositeurs]], the [[International Federation of Musicians]], the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies, the [[Recording Industry Association of America]], the [[National Music Publishers' Association]], [[The Recording Academy]], the [[Independent Music Companies Association]], the Worldwide Independent Network, the [[American Association of Independent Music]], the NSAI, the [[National Association of Music Merchants]] (NAMM), and the Independent Music Publishers International Forum (IMPF) announced that the global music community based application, that was supported by a global music coalition with members representing over 95% of global music consumed, was approved by the [[Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers]] (ICANN).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://music.us/press-releases/global-music-community-wins-music-domain-extension-rights/ |title=Global music community prevails in winning the rights to the .MUSIC domain extension |access-date=2021-03-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024000047/https://music.us/press-releases/global-music-community-wins-music-domain-extension-rights/ |archive-date=2020-10-24 }}</ref> The .MUSIC registry agreement was signed on May 4, 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.icann.org/en/registry-agreements/details/music?section=agreement |title=.music Registry Agreement |access-date=2021-09-20}}</ref>


On April 17, 2020 DotMusic Limited announced that their global music community application for the .MUSIC registry prevailed.{{Cn|date=July 2020}} ICANN will award DotMusic the rights to the .MUSIC top-level domain name extension and move to contracting soon{{When|date=July 2020}}.
==Applicants==
==Applicants==
# .MUSIC <ref name="music.us-what-is">{{cite web |title=What is the .MUSIC Domain? |url=https://music.us/what-is-music/ |website=[[.MUSIC]] (DotMusic) |access-date=24 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304062343/https://music.us/what-is-music/ |archive-date=2021-03-04 |quote=The .MUSIC Initiative by DotMusic is a truly global .MUSIC community-led effort and the only initiative with enhanced music tailored policies that ensure that music artists, bands, industry professionals and organizations register a trusted, secure and verified .MUSIC domain — a safe, authenticated domain identity similar to that of a domain ending in .EDU or .GOV — and own their exclusive www.name.music web address.}}</ref>
# [[.MUSIC (company)|.MUSIC]] (DotMusic Limited) (''[[Community TLD|Community Priority Application]]'')
# [[Far Further]] (.music LLC) (''Community Priority Application'')
# [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]] ([[Entertainment Names Inc.]]) - This applicant submitted a [[Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://web.archive.org/web/20160722064026/https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/267 here].
# [[Google]] (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
# [[Google]] (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
# [[Amazon.com|Amazon]]
# Radix (DotMusic Inc.), one of 31 applications filed by the company
# Donuts (Victor Cross)
# [[Famous Four Media]], one of 57 applications filed by the company. This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded [https://web.archive.org/web/20160722064058/https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1261 here].
# Far Further
# Donuts (Victor Cross) - This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded [https://web.archive.org/web/20160722064031/https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/646 here].
# Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd. (TLDH) and LHL TLD Investment Partners
# [[Amazon.com|Amazon]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/applicationstatus/viewstatus Music Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
# Radix
# Famous Four Media[[GRS Domains]]


=== .MUSIC / Dot Music Limited ===
===.MUSIC===
This application for .music is a community priority application and was applied for by .MUSIC under the legal name of DotMusic Limited. CGR E-Commerce Ltd is part of the [[Roussos Group of Companies]] (RGC) and parent company of DotMusic Limited.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.roussosgroup.com/ |title=Office Roussos Hermes |access-date=March 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130614223113/http://roussosgroup.com/ |archive-date=June 14, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> MUSIC is headed by [[Constantine Roussos]]. In 2005 he launched the .MUSIC (music.us) website to gather support via a petition to [[ICANN]] to approve the .music TLD for the global [[music community]]. Organizations it counts among its supporters include: [[International Federation of Arts Councils & Culture Agencies]] (IFACCA), [[American Association of Independent Music]] (A2IM), [[National Association of Recording Manufacturers]] (NARM).<ref>Application 1-1115-14110</ref> The .MUSIC Initiative objectives include:<ref name="linkedin">
A community priority application was applied for by .MUSIC under the legal name of DotMusic.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.roussosgroup.com/ |title=Roussos Group |access-date=March 3, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130614223113/http://roussosgroup.com/ |archive-date=June 14, 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> MUSIC was headed by [[Constantine Roussos]], who launched the .MUSIC Initiative in 2005 to gather support from the global music community for a petition to ICANN for the rights of .MUSIC. Associated organizations included the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies (IFACCA), the [[American Association of Independent Music]] (A2IM), and the National Association of Music Manufacturers (NAMM).<ref>Application 1-1115-14110</ref> The initiative's objectives included:<ref name="linkedin">
[http://www.linkedin.com/in/constantineroussos Constantine Roussos Linkedin Profile]</ref><ref name="music.us">{{Cite web |url=http://music.us/ |title=music.us |access-date=2013-06-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130614091407/http://www.music.us/ |archive-date=2013-06-14 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
[http://www.linkedin.com/in/constantineroussos Constantine Roussos Linkedin Profile]</ref><ref name="music.us">{{Cite web |url=http://music.us/ |title=music.us |access-date=2013-06-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130614091407/http://www.music.us/ |archive-date=2013-06-14 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* Music Education
* Music education
* Fighting [[Online piracy|piracy]]
* Fight Against Piracy to Protect Trademarks and Music Intellectual Capital
* Promoting Arts and Global Music
* Promoting the arts and global music
* Innovation in Music and Internet Space
* Innovation in music and the internet space
* Promoting competition
* Promote Competition


The team plans to operate the .music TLD using the multi-stakeholder approach and a portion of the revenue generated from the .music TLD registrations will be donated to selected non-profit music organizations. Registrations will be restricted to .MUSIC-accredited Community Member Organizations (MCMOs).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://music.us/about.htm |title=About Us |access-date=2013-06-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130529115135/http://music.us/about.htm |archive-date=2013-05-29 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The company chose [[Afilias]] to provide back-end registry services.<ref>[http://www.prweb.com/releases/prwebdotmusic_gTLD_music/top_level_domain_icann/prweb9596321.htm .MUSIC (DotMusic) Applies for Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) with ICANN]</ref>
The team planned to operate the .music TLD using a multi-stakeholder approach. A portion of the revenue generated from registrations was marked for donation to selected non-profit music organizations. These registrations would be restricted to .MUSIC-accredited Community Member Organizations (MCMOs).<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://music.us/about.htm |title=About Us |access-date=2013-06-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130529115135/http://music.us/about.htm |archive-date=2013-05-29 |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[CentralNic]] was selected as the back-end registry services provider.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120616034326/http://www.prweb.com/releases/prwebdotmusic_gTLD_music/top_level_domain_icann/prweb9596321.htm .MUSIC (DotMusic) Applies for Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) with ICANN]</ref>


===Far Further/.Music LLC===
===Far Further===
Far Further was founded by music professionals <ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.farfurther.com/about-us.html/# |title=About US |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518092240/http://www.farfurther.com/about-us.html/# |archive-date=2015-05-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref> with the objective to unite the global [[music industry]] and to provide a secure domain space for the industry, with a mission <ref name="farfurther">{{Cite web |url=http://www.farfurther.com/mission# |title=Far Further Mission |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924010527/http://www.farfurther.com/mission# |archive-date=2015-09-24 |url-status=dead }}</ref> to promote music, protect intellectual property rights and to help advance music education through the .music TLD. Their application for .music was a community priority application and was applied for under the legal name of .music LLC, which is a subsidiary of Far Further LLC.
Far Further was founded by music professionals<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.farfurther.com/about-us.html/ |title=About US |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150518092240/http://www.farfurther.com/about-us.html/ |archive-date=2015-05-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref> with the objective of uniting the global [[music industry]] by providing it with a secure domain space<ref name="farfurther">{{Cite web |url=http://www.farfurther.com/mission |title=Far Further Mission |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924010527/http://www.farfurther.com/mission |archive-date=2015-09-24 |url-status=dead }}</ref> to promote music, protect intellectual property rights and help advance music education. They submitted a community priority application using .music LLC, a subsidiary of Far Further LLC.


The company chose [[Neustar]] to provide back-end registry services. The .music TLD was to be restricted and registrants to be qualified via association with a number of supporting organizations.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/riaa-backs-music-new-gtld-bid/ RIAA backs .music new gTLD bid]</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.farfurther.com/about-us# |title=About Far Further |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510121805/http://www.farfurther.com/about-us# |archive-date=2015-05-10 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
The company chose [[Neustar]] to provide back-end registry services. The domain was to be restricted to registrants qualified via association with a number of supporting organizations.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/riaa-backs-music-new-gtld-bid/ RIAA backs .music new gTLD bid]</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.farfurther.com/about-us |title=About Far Further |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510121805/http://www.farfurther.com/about-us |archive-date=2015-05-10 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


===TLDH and LHL Bid===
===TLDH and LHL===
On March 23, 2012, [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]] and [[LHL TLD Investment Partners]] signed a partnership agreement to apply for the .music TLD. [[Minds + Machines]] was to provide the back-end registry solutions for the company.<ref>[http://www.tldh.org/2012/03/tldh-to-apply-for-music/ TLDH to apply for .music]</ref>
On March 23, 2012, Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd. and LHL TLD Investment Partners signed a partnership agreement to apply for the .music TLD. Minds + Machines was to provide the back-end registry services.<ref>[http://www.tldh.org/2012/03/tldh-to-apply-for-music/ TLDH to apply for .music]</ref>


===Amazon===
===Amazon===
[[Amazon.com|Amazon]]'s application was issued a [[ICANN#Governmental Advisory Committee|GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
[[Amazon.com|Amazon]]'s application was issued a [[ICANN#Governmental Advisory Committee|GAC]] Early Warning<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> from representative of Australia and GAC Chair Heather Dryden. It stated that the applicant was "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string [..] that relates to a broad market sector," which Dryden noted could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Music-AU-18029.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353430576000 |title=Music AU, GACweb.ICANN.org |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121103431/https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Music-AU-18029.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353430576000 |archive-date=2013-01-21 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Music-AU-18029.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353430576000# |title=Music AU, GACweb.ICANN.org |access-date=2018-11-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121103431/https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Music-AU-18029.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353430576000# |archive-date=2013-01-21 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


===Radix===
===Radix===
Radix received a [[ICANN#Governmental Advisory Committee|GAC]] Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121103409/https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000# |date=2013-01-21 }} Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref>
Radix received a GAC Early Warning from the U.S. Government. The issue did not relate to their technical capabilities or the content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an [[email address]] associated with the U.S. [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] in a recommendation filed with Radix's application.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130121103409/https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 |date=2013-01-21 }} Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref>


==Objections==
==Objections==
A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator [[WIPO]], is a third party "formal objection to an application on several grounds [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel ({{sic|comprised |hide=y|of}} one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/ LRO, WIPO.int] Retrieved 25 March 2013</ref>


===Legal Rights Objections===
===Official objection===
An official Legal Rights Objection was filed by [[DotMusic Limited]] against .music applicants since DotMusic Limited had registered trademarks for ".music" and "dotmusic" in nearly 30 countries.<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/cases/ LRO Cases, WIPO.int]</ref>
An official objection was filed by DotMusic Limited against .music applicants since DotMusic Limited had registered trademarks for ".music" and "dotmusic" in nearly thirty countries.<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/cases/ LRO Cases, WIPO.int]</ref>

A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator, [[WIPO]], is when, "third parties may file a formal objection to an application on several grounds, including, for trademark owners and Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel ({{sic|comprised |hide=y|of}} one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/ LRO, WIPO.int] Retrieved 25 March 2013</ref>


===Community objections===
===Community objections===
The American Association of Independent Music and DotMusic filed community objections against [[Google]], [[dot Music Limited]], [[Dotmusic Inc.]], [[Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd.]], and Donuts on the basis that they applied as open registries without enhanced safeguards or sufficient eligibility restrictions to protect music-related intellectual property and prevent music piracy. The American Association of Independent Music also filed a Community Objection against [[Amazon.com|Amazon]] because of its application's exclusive-access registry policies and discriminatory registration eligibility criteria that restricted registrations solely for Amazon and its affiliates. The International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies and DotMusic also filed a community objection against Far Further because of its application's exclusive-access registry policies and discriminatory registration eligibility criteria that restricted registrations solely for Far Further and its affiliates.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ List of Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref> The objections against both Amazon's and Far Further's applications were based on their exclusive-access registration policies which ignored the ICANN Registry Agreement which required that new gTLD registries to be subject to the requirements of Specification 11 mandating that a TLD Registry must provide non-discriminatory access to registry services to all ICANN accredited registrars that enter into and are in compliance with the registry-registrar agreement for the TLD.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-specs-04jun12-en.pdf New gTLD Agreement, Section 2.9, ICANN.org]</ref> In February 2014 ICANN passed Resolutions for the new gTLD Program and followed Government Advisory Committee advice to mandate specific enhanced safeguards<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-2-05feb14-en.pdf ICANN Resolutions, ICANN.org]</ref> and to prohibit applicants from operating a new gTLD as an exclusive-access registry for a TLD based on a generic term.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1-05feb14-en.pdf ICANN Resolutions, ICANN.org]</ref>
The American Association of Independent Music (AAIM) and DotMusic filed community objections against Google, dot Music Limited, Dotmusic Inc., Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd., and Donuts on the basis that they applied as open registries without enhanced safeguards or sufficient eligibility restrictions to protect music-related intellectual property and prevent music piracy. The AAIM also filed a community objection against Amazon because of its application's exclusive-access registry policies and discriminatory registration eligibility criteria that restricted registrations solely to Amazon and its affiliates. For the same reason, the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies and DotMusic filed a community objection against Far Further.<ref>[http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/arbitration-and-adr/expertise/icann-new-gtld-dispute-resolution/pending-cases/ List of Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org] Retrieved 14 May 2013</ref>
The objections against Amazon and Far Further were based on the ICANN Registry Agreement which required that new gTLD registries be subject to the requirements of Specification 11, which mandates that a TLD Registry must provide non-discriminatory access to registry services to all ICANN accredited registrars that enter into and are in compliance with the registry-registrar agreement for the TLD.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/base-agreement-specs-04jun12-en.pdf New gTLD Agreement, Section 2.9, ICANN.org]</ref> In February 2014 ICANN passed resolutions for the new gTLD program which mandated specific enhanced safeguards<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-2-05feb14-en.pdf ICANN Resolutions, ICANN.org]</ref> and prohibited applicants from operating a new gTLD as an exclusive-access registry for a TLD based on a generic term.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1-05feb14-en.pdf ICANN Resolutions, ICANN.org]</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 18:50, 15 December 2024

.music
TLD typeCommunity
StatusICANN Registry Agreement for .music was signed on May 4, 2021
Intended usemusic
Registry websitemusic.us

.music is a community-based top-level domain name (TLD) operated for the benefit of the global music community. It was one of the most highly contested new gTLDs, with eight applicants in contention.

On April 17, 2019, the .MUSIC registry, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, Confédération Internationale des Sociétés d'Auteurs et Compositeurs, the International Federation of Musicians, the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies, the Recording Industry Association of America, the National Music Publishers' Association, The Recording Academy, the Independent Music Companies Association, the Worldwide Independent Network, the American Association of Independent Music, the NSAI, the National Association of Music Merchants (NAMM), and the Independent Music Publishers International Forum (IMPF) announced that the global music community based application, that was supported by a global music coalition with members representing over 95% of global music consumed, was approved by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).[1] The .MUSIC registry agreement was signed on May 4, 2021.[2]

Applicants

[edit]
  1. .MUSIC [3]
  2. Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
  3. Amazon
  4. Donuts (Victor Cross)
  5. Far Further
  6. Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd. (TLDH) and LHL TLD Investment Partners
  7. Radix
  8. Famous Four MediaGRS Domains

.MUSIC

[edit]

A community priority application was applied for by .MUSIC under the legal name of DotMusic.[4] MUSIC was headed by Constantine Roussos, who launched the .MUSIC Initiative in 2005 to gather support from the global music community for a petition to ICANN for the rights of .MUSIC. Associated organizations included the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies (IFACCA), the American Association of Independent Music (A2IM), and the National Association of Music Manufacturers (NAMM).[5] The initiative's objectives included:[6][7]

  • Music education
  • Fighting piracy
  • Promoting the arts and global music
  • Innovation in music and the internet space
  • Promoting competition

The team planned to operate the .music TLD using a multi-stakeholder approach. A portion of the revenue generated from registrations was marked for donation to selected non-profit music organizations. These registrations would be restricted to .MUSIC-accredited Community Member Organizations (MCMOs).[8] CentralNic was selected as the back-end registry services provider.[9]

Far Further

[edit]

Far Further was founded by music professionals[10] with the objective of uniting the global music industry by providing it with a secure domain space[11] to promote music, protect intellectual property rights and help advance music education. They submitted a community priority application using .music LLC, a subsidiary of Far Further LLC.

The company chose Neustar to provide back-end registry services. The domain was to be restricted to registrants qualified via association with a number of supporting organizations.[12][13]

TLDH and LHL

[edit]

On March 23, 2012, Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd. and LHL TLD Investment Partners signed a partnership agreement to apply for the .music TLD. Minds + Machines was to provide the back-end registry services.[14]

Amazon

[edit]

Amazon's application was issued a GAC Early Warning[15] from representative of Australia and GAC Chair Heather Dryden. It stated that the applicant was "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string [..] that relates to a broad market sector," which Dryden noted could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[16]

Radix

[edit]

Radix received a GAC Early Warning from the U.S. Government. The issue did not relate to their technical capabilities or the content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation in a recommendation filed with Radix's application.[17]

Objections

[edit]

A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator WIPO, is a third party "formal objection to an application on several grounds [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel (comprised of one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."[18]

Official objection

[edit]

An official objection was filed by DotMusic Limited against .music applicants since DotMusic Limited had registered trademarks for ".music" and "dotmusic" in nearly thirty countries.[19]

Community objections

[edit]

The American Association of Independent Music (AAIM) and DotMusic filed community objections against Google, dot Music Limited, Dotmusic Inc., Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd., and Donuts on the basis that they applied as open registries without enhanced safeguards or sufficient eligibility restrictions to protect music-related intellectual property and prevent music piracy. The AAIM also filed a community objection against Amazon because of its application's exclusive-access registry policies and discriminatory registration eligibility criteria that restricted registrations solely to Amazon and its affiliates. For the same reason, the International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies and DotMusic filed a community objection against Far Further.[20]

The objections against Amazon and Far Further were based on the ICANN Registry Agreement which required that new gTLD registries be subject to the requirements of Specification 11, which mandates that a TLD Registry must provide non-discriminatory access to registry services to all ICANN accredited registrars that enter into and are in compliance with the registry-registrar agreement for the TLD.[21] In February 2014 ICANN passed resolutions for the new gTLD program which mandated specific enhanced safeguards[22] and prohibited applicants from operating a new gTLD as an exclusive-access registry for a TLD based on a generic term.[23]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Global music community prevails in winning the rights to the .MUSIC domain extension". Archived from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2021-03-25.
  2. ^ ".music Registry Agreement". Retrieved 2021-09-20.
  3. ^ "What is the .MUSIC Domain?". .MUSIC (DotMusic). Archived from the original on 2021-03-04. Retrieved 24 June 2021. The .MUSIC Initiative by DotMusic is a truly global .MUSIC community-led effort and the only initiative with enhanced music tailored policies that ensure that music artists, bands, industry professionals and organizations register a trusted, secure and verified .MUSIC domain — a safe, authenticated domain identity similar to that of a domain ending in .EDU or .GOV — and own their exclusive www.name.music web address.
  4. ^ "Roussos Group". Archived from the original on June 14, 2013. Retrieved March 3, 2019.
  5. ^ Application 1-1115-14110
  6. ^ Constantine Roussos Linkedin Profile
  7. ^ "music.us". Archived from the original on 2013-06-14. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
  8. ^ "About Us". Archived from the original on 2013-05-29. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
  9. ^ .MUSIC (DotMusic) Applies for Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) with ICANN
  10. ^ "About US". Archived from the original on 2015-05-18. Retrieved 2018-11-27.
  11. ^ "Far Further Mission". Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2018-11-27.
  12. ^ RIAA backs .music new gTLD bid
  13. ^ "About Far Further". Archived from the original on 2015-05-10. Retrieved 2018-11-27.
  14. ^ TLDH to apply for .music
  15. ^ GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org Retrieved 25 Nov 2012
  16. ^ "Music AU, GACweb.ICANN.org" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-01-21. Retrieved 2018-11-27.
  17. ^ RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org Archived 2013-01-21 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 27 Nov 2012
  18. ^ LRO, WIPO.int Retrieved 25 March 2013
  19. ^ LRO Cases, WIPO.int
  20. ^ List of Pending Cases, ICCWBO.org Retrieved 14 May 2013
  21. ^ New gTLD Agreement, Section 2.9, ICANN.org
  22. ^ ICANN Resolutions, ICANN.org
  23. ^ ICANN Resolutions, ICANN.org