Jump to content

Hot reading: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Remove repetitive statement
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Technique used when giving a psychic reading in stage magic performances}}
{{redirect|Hot read|the American football term|Hot read (American football)}}
{{redirect|Hot read|the American football term|Hot read (American football)}}
{{Paranormal}}
{{Paranormal}}
'''Hot reading''' is a technique used when giving a [[psychic reading]] in [[stage magic]] performances, or in other contexts. In hot reading, the reader uses information about the person receiving the reading (for example, from background research or overhearing a conversation) which the receiver is not aware that the reader already knows. Hot reading is commonly used in conjunction with [[cold reading]] (where no previously gathered information is used) and can explain how a [[psychic]] reader can get a specific claimed "hit" of accurate information.<ref name="Skepdic">{{cite web | title=Hot Reading | url=http://www.skepdic.com/hotreading.html | publisher=The Skeptic's Dictionary |author= Robert Todd Carroll | accessdate=2006-06-14}}</ref>
'''Hot reading''' is a technique used when giving a [[psychic reading]] in [[stage magic]] performances, or in other contexts. In hot reading, the reader uses information about the person receiving the reading (for example, from background research or overhearing a conversation) which the receiver is not aware that the reader already knows. Hot reading is commonly used in conjunction with [[cold reading]] (where no previously gathered information is used) and can explain how a [[psychic]] reader can get a specific claimed "hit" of accurate information.<ref name="Skepdic">{{cite web | title=Hot Reading | url=http://www.skepdic.com/hotreading.html | publisher=The Skeptic's Dictionary |author= Robert Todd Carroll |authorlink=Robert Todd Carroll| accessdate=2006-06-14}}</ref><ref name="Skeptic Report">{{cite web|title=Cold Reading: Confessions of a 'Psychic' |url=http://www.skepticreport.com/psychicpowers/confessions.htm |publisher=Skeptic Report |author=Colin Hunter |accessdate=2007-10-18 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070923154431/http://www.skepticreport.com/psychicpowers/confessions.htm |archivedate=2007-09-23 |url-status=dead }}</ref> The psychics may have clients schedule their appearance ahead of time, and then collect information using collaborators who pose as religious [[missionary|missionaries]], magazine sales people, or similar roles.<ref>''[http://www.reall.org/newsletter/v11/n05/psychic-secrets.html Secrets of Psychics Revealed]'', NBC ([[2003 in television|2003]])</ref> Such visitors can gain a wide understanding of a person from examining their home, where tickets for the show may have been sent in advance. The "psychic" may then be briefed on the information, and told where the person will sit in the audience.<ref>Stagnaro, Angelo. ''Something from Nothing''. Manipulix Books. 2004.</ref>

This technique is used by some television psychics in conjunction with [[cold reading]].<ref name="Skeptic Report">{{cite web|title=Cold Reading: Confessions of a 'Psychic' |url=http://www.skepticreport.com/psychicpowers/confessions.htm |publisher=Skeptic Report |author=Colin Hunter |accessdate=2007-10-18 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070923154431/http://www.skepticreport.com/psychicpowers/confessions.htm |archivedate=2007-09-23 |deadurl=yes |df= }}</ref> The psychics may have clients schedule their appearance ahead of time, and then collect information using collaborators who pose as religious [[missionary|missionaries]], magazine sales people, or similar roles.<ref>''[http://www.reall.org/newsletter/v11/n05/psychic-secrets.html Secrets of Psychics Revealed]'', NBC ([[2003 in television|2003]])</ref> Such visitors can gain a wide understanding of a person from examining their home, where tickets for the show may have been sent in advance. The "psychic" may then be briefed on the information, and told where the person will sit in the audience.<ref>Stagnaro, Angelo. ''Something from Nothing''. Manipulix Books. 2004.</ref>


==History==
==History==


There are many methods that involve hot reading. In 1938, the magician [[John Mulholland (magician)|John Mulholland]] wrote:
There are many methods that involve hot reading. In 1938, the magician [[John Mulholland (magician)|John Mulholland]] wrote:<ref>[[John Mulholland (magician)|Mulholland, John]] (1938). ''Beware Familiar Spirits''. Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 186. {{ISBN|0-684-16181-8}}</ref>


<blockquote>Where do the mediums get the information? It is very easy. Look the person up in a telephone book. Talk to the corner grocer. Go to the house and try to sell a magazine subscription. Talk to the neighbours. Talk to the servants if there are any. If it is a small city go to the cemetery and look at the tombstones. It has to be done carefully but it is very easy.<ref>[[John Mulholland (magician)|Mulholland, John]] (1938). ''Beware Familiar Spirits''. Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 186. {{ISBN|0-684-16181-8}}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>Where do the mediums get the information? It is very easy. Look the person up in a telephone book. Talk to the corner grocer. Go to the house and try to sell a magazine subscription. Talk to the neighbours. Talk to the servants if there are any. If it is a small city go to the cemetery and look at the tombstones. It has to be done carefully but it is very easy.</blockquote>


Commenting on mediums from the early 20th century, historian [[Ruth Brandon]] noted:
Commenting on mediums from the early 20th century, historian [[Ruth Brandon]] noted:<ref>[[Ruth Brandon|Brandon, Ruth]]. (1983). ''The Spiritualists: The Passion for the Occult in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries''. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 46. {{ISBN|0-297-78249-5}}</ref>


<blockquote>There were a number of recognized methods in use. Some were very down-to-earth. When a medium visited a new town, he was advised to visit the local cemetery and make a note of names, dates, and any other information to be obtained from the tombstones. He might also consult the "Blue Book" for the area, a compilation circulated among mediums listing, for an increasing number of places, the names of leading spiritualists likely to attend seances, with descriptions, family histories, and details (deceased spouses, children, parents, etc.) and other information likely to be of use.<ref>[[Ruth Brandon|Brandon, Ruth]]. (1983). ''The Spiritualists: The Passion for the Occult in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries''. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 46. {{ISBN|0-297-78249-5}}</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>There were a number of recognized methods in use. Some were very down-to-earth. When a medium visited a new town, he was advised to visit the local cemetery and make a note of names, dates, and any other information to be obtained from the tombstones. He might also consult the "Blue Book" for the area, a compilation circulated among mediums listing, for an increasing number of places, the names of leading spiritualists likely to attend seances, with descriptions, family histories, and details (deceased spouses, children, parents, etc.) and other information likely to be of use.</blockquote>


[[Skeptical movement|Skeptical activist]] [[Susan Gerbic]] lists hot reading as one of a number of methods used by psychics to achieve their effects. She points out it can be done with nothing more than a name, location, and access to [[Facebook]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gerbic|first1=Susan|title=Ten Tricks of the Psychics I Bet You Didn't Know|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/ten_tricks_of_the_psychics_i_bet_you_didnrsquot_know|website=CSI|publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry|accessdate=23 March 2018}}</ref>
[[Skeptical movement|Skeptical activist]] [[Susan Gerbic]] lists hot reading as one of a number of methods used by psychics to achieve their effects. She points out it can be done with nothing more than a name, location, and access to [[Facebook]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gerbic|first1=Susan|authorlink=Susan Gerbic |title=Ten Tricks of the Psychics I Bet You Didn't Know|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/ten_tricks_of_the_psychics_i_bet_you_didnrsquot_know|website=CSI|publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry|accessdate=23 March 2018}}</ref>


Notable mediums from the past who were exposed as utilizing hot reading methods have included [[Rosina Thompson]] and [[George Valiantine]].<ref>[[Joseph McCabe|McCabe, Joseph]]. (1920). [https://archive.org/stream/isspiritualismba00mccarich#page/138/mode/2up ''Is Spiritualism Based On Fraud? The Evidence Given By Sir A.C. Doyle and Others Drastically Examined'']. London Watts & Co. p. 138. "Dr. Hodgson, that quint mixture of blunt criticism and occasional credulity, had six sittings with her, and roundly stated that she was a fraud. The correct information which she gave him was, he said, taken from letters to which she had access, or from works of references like ''Who's Who''. In one case, which made a great impression, she gave some remarkably abstruse and correct information. It was afterwards found that the facts were stated in an old diary which had belonged to her husband."</ref><ref>[[Paul Tabori|Tabori, Price]] (1966). ''Harry Price: The Biography of a Ghosthunter''. Living Books. p. 120</ref>
Notable mediums from the past who were exposed as utilizing hot reading methods have included [[Rosina Thompson]] and [[George Valiantine]].<ref>[[Joseph McCabe|McCabe, Joseph]]. (1920). [https://archive.org/stream/isspiritualismba00mccarich#page/138/mode/2up ''Is Spiritualism Based On Fraud? The Evidence Given By Sir A.C. Doyle and Others Drastically Examined'']. London Watts & Co. p. 138. "Dr. Hodgson, that quint mixture of blunt criticism and occasional credulity, had six sittings with her, and roundly stated that she was a fraud. The correct information which she gave him was, he said, taken from letters to which she had access, or from works of references like ''Who's Who''. In one case, which made a great impression, she gave some remarkably abstruse and correct information. It was afterwards found that the facts were stated in an old diary which had belonged to her husband."</ref><ref>Tabori, Price (1966). ''Harry Price: The Biography of a Ghosthunter''. Living Books. p. 120</ref>


==Modern examples of hot reading==
==Modern examples of hot reading==
[[Televangelist]] [[Peter Popoff]]'s wife, Elizabeth, was seen canvassing the crowd before a show, and it was later noticed that Popoff was wearing a [[hearing aid]], which is odd for a [[faith healer]]. In 1986, [[James Randi]] and his associate Steve Shaw, an illusionist known professionally as [[Banachek]], organized Project Beta with technical assistance from the crime scene analyst and electronics expert Alexander Jason.<ref name=JREF>{{cite web |url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/166-swift-february-22-2008.html#i7 |title=NEW FOR TAM6!|publisher=[[James Randi Educational Foundation]] |date=February 22, 2008 |first=James |last=Randi |authorlink=James Randi}}</ref> Using computerized [[scanner (radio)|radio scanners]], Jason was able to demonstrate that Popoff's wife was using a wireless radio transmitter to broadcast information that she and her aides had culled from prayer request cards filled out by audience members. Popoff received the transmissions via an in-ear receiver and repeated the information to astonished audience members. Jason produced video segments interspersing the intercepted radio transmissions with Popoff's "miraculous" pronouncements.<ref name=Broadway.com>Daniel, Danica (April 24, 2012). [http://www.broadway.com/buzz/161393/are-you-ready-for-a-miracle-how-leap-of-faith-jumped-from-the-movie-screen-to-broadway/ "Are You Ready For a Miracle? How ''Leap of Faith'' Jumped From the Movie Screen to Broadway"]. [[Broadway.com]].</ref>
[[Televangelist]] [[Peter Popoff]]'s wife, Elizabeth, was seen canvassing the crowd before a show, and it was later noticed that Popoff was wearing a [[hearing aid]]. In 1986, [[James Randi]] and his associate Steve Shaw, an illusionist known professionally as [[Banachek]], organized Project Beta with technical assistance from the crime scene analyst and electronics expert Alexander Jason.<ref name=JREF>{{cite web |url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/166-swift-february-22-2008.html#i7 |title=NEW FOR TAM6!|publisher=[[James Randi Educational Foundation]] |date=February 22, 2008 |first=James |last=Randi |authorlink=James Randi}}</ref> Using computerized [[scanner (radio)|radio scanners]], Jason was able to demonstrate that Popoff's wife was using a wireless radio transmitter to broadcast information that she and her aides had culled from prayer request cards filled out by audience members. Popoff received the transmissions via an in-ear receiver and repeated the information to astonished audience members. Jason produced video segments interspersing the intercepted radio transmissions with Popoff's "miraculous" pronouncements.<ref name=Broadway.com>Daniel, Danica (April 24, 2012). [http://www.broadway.com/buzz/161393/are-you-ready-for-a-miracle-how-leap-of-faith-jumped-from-the-movie-screen-to-broadway/ "Are You Ready For a Miracle? How ''Leap of Faith'' Jumped From the Movie Screen to Broadway"]. [[Broadway.com]].</ref>


Independent Investigation Group [[IIG]] director [[James Underdown]] writes that in one of the live shows of ''Beyond'' they witnessed, [[James Van Praagh]] was observed signing books and chatting with a woman he learned was from Italy. During the taping he asked that same section if there was "someone from another country". To the TV audience this would have looked impressive when she raised her hand, however he had used the hot reading technique of gaining foreknowledge.<ref>
Independent Investigation Group [[IIG]] director [[James Underdown]] writes that in one of the live shows of ''Beyond'' they witnessed, [[James Van Praagh]] was observed signing books and chatting with a woman he learned was from Italy. During the taping he asked that same section if there was "someone from another country". To the TV audience this would have looked impressive when she raised her hand, however he had used the hot reading technique of gaining foreknowledge.<ref>
Line 26: Line 25:
| last = Underdown
| last = Underdown
| first = James
| first = James
| authorlink =
| authorlink = James Underdown
| title = TV psychics John Edward and John Van Praagh
| title = TV psychics John Edward and John Van Praagh
| journal = [[Skeptical Inquirer]]
| journal = [[Skeptical Inquirer]]
Line 36: Line 35:
|publisher=The Straight Dope |date=2003-11-18 |accessdate=2011-03-12}}</ref>
|publisher=The Straight Dope |date=2003-11-18 |accessdate=2011-03-12}}</ref>


A 2001 ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' article reported that psychic [[John Edward]] allegedly used hot reading on his television show, ''Crossing Over'', where an audience member who received a reading was suspicious of prior behaviour from Edward's aides, who had struck up conversations with audience members and asked them to fill out cards detailing their family trees.<ref name="Time">{{cite news | title=Talking to the Dead | url=http://www.time.com/time/columnist/jaroff/article/0,9565,100555,00.html | publisher=Time Magazine | author=Leon Jaroff | accessdate=2006-06-14 | date=2001-02-25 | deadurl=yes | archiveurl=https://archive.is/20130104233353/http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0%2C8599%2C100555%2C00.html | archivedate=2013-01-04 | df= }}</ref> In December 2001, Edward was alleged to have used foreknowledge to hot read in an interview on the television show ''[[dateline NBC|Dateline]]'', where a reading for a cameraman was based on knowledge gained in conversation some hours previously, yet presented as if he were unaware of the cameraman's background.<ref name="CSICOP">{{cite web | title=John Edward: Hustling the Bereaved| url=http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-11/i-files.html | publisher=CSICOP |author=Joe Nickell | accessdate=2006-06-14}}</ref> In his 2001 book, John Edward denied ever using foreknowledge, cold or hot reading.<ref>{{cite book | last = Edward | first = John | year = 2001 | title = Crossing Over | publisher = Jodere Group| isbn = 978-1-58872-002-3}}</ref>
A 2001 ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' article reported that psychic [[John Edward]] allegedly used hot reading on his television show, ''Crossing Over'', where an audience member who received a reading was suspicious of prior behaviour from Edward's aides, who had struck up conversations with audience members and asked them to fill out cards detailing their family trees.<ref name="Time">{{cite news | title=Talking to the Dead | url=http://www.time.com/time/columnist/jaroff/article/0,9565,100555,00.html | work=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] | author=Leon Jaroff | accessdate=2006-06-14 | date=2001-02-25 | url-status=dead | archiveurl=https://archive.today/20130104233353/http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0%2C8599%2C100555%2C00.html | archivedate=2013-01-04 }}</ref> In December 2001, Edward was alleged to have used foreknowledge to hot read in an interview on the television show ''[[dateline NBC|Dateline]]'', where a reading for a cameraman was based on knowledge gained in conversation some hours previously, yet presented as if he were unaware of the cameraman's background.<ref name="CSICOP">{{cite web| title=John Edward: Hustling the Bereaved| url=http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-11/i-files.html| publisher=CSICOP| author=Joe Nickell|authorlink=Joe Nickell| accessdate=2006-06-14| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061216045701/http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-11/i-files.html| archive-date=2006-12-16| url-status=dead}}</ref> In his 2001 book, John Edward denied ever using foreknowledge, cold or hot reading.<ref>{{cite book | last = Edward | first = John | year = 2001 | title = Crossing Over | publisher = Jodere Group | isbn = 978-1-58872-002-3 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/crossingoversto000edwa }}</ref>


In March 2017, alleged psychic [[Thomas John Flanagan]] was found to have used information posted on social media by people coming to his shows, in order to accurately guess details about their lives while pretending to be communicating with the dead. He unknowingly used backstories from fake Facebook profiles previously prepared by a group of [[Skepticism|skeptics]] led by [[Susan Gerbic]] and [[Mark Edward]]. When John used that information while pretending to hear Gerbic's and Edward's dead relatives, the only possible way he could be aware of these details is if he or members of his team read the fake profiles while preparing for their performance, since even Gerbic and Edward themselves were not aware of the specific information placed on the profiles that matches the [[Pseudonym|aliases]] they were using when attending the show. John also uses actors on his television show ''Seatbelt Psychic'', their lives being well documented on social media.<ref name="Pizza">{{cite news |last1=Gerbic |first1=Susan|authorlink=Susan Gerbic |title=Operation Pizza Roll- Thomas John |url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/operation_pizza_roll_-_thomas_john?fbclid=IwAR2TfdfXhTIZfrR8IWaZcsnrypUqJLb5h-YEpkdkWriLUzUjMqjt0Rvlzug|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190224032143/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/operation_pizza_roll_-_thomas_john|archive-date=February 23, 2019 |accessdate=February 23, 2019 |date=February 21, 2019}}</ref><ref name=FA>{{Cite web|url=https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/02/23/skeptics-set-a-trap-and-a-so-called-celebrity-medium-fell-for-the-hoax/|title=Skeptics Set a Trap and a So-Called “Celebrity Medium” Fell for the Hoax|last=Mehta|first=Hemant|authorlink=Hemant Mehta|date=February 23, 2019|website=The Friendly Atheist|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190224040852/https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/02/23/skeptics-set-a-trap-and-a-so-called-celebrity-medium-fell-for-the-hoax/|archive-date=February 23, 2019|dead-url=|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref><ref name=Buckle>{{Cite web|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/buckle_up_-_seatbelt_psychic|title=Buckle Up - Seatbelt Psychic|last=Gerbic|first=Susan|authorlink=Susan Gerbic|date=February 21, 2019|website=Center for Inquiry|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190224032258/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/buckle_up_-_seatbelt_psychic|archive-date=February 23, 2019|dead-url=|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref>
In March 2017, alleged psychic [[Thomas John (medium)|Thomas John Flanagan]] was found to have used information posted on social media by people coming to his shows, in order to accurately guess details about their lives while pretending to be communicating with the dead. He unknowingly used backstories from fake Facebook profiles previously prepared by a group of [[Skepticism|skeptics]] led by [[Susan Gerbic]] and [[Mark Edward]]. When Flanagan used that information while pretending to hear Gerbic's and Edward's dead relatives, the only possible way he could be aware of these details is if he or members of his team read the fake profiles while preparing for their performance, since even Gerbic and Edward themselves were not aware of the specific information placed on the profiles that matched the [[Pseudonym|aliases]] they were using when attending the show. In 2021 Flanagan held an online meeting for children aged 5-12. Two of the supposed children had fake identities and one was much older than claimed (which Flanagan failed to detect). In his readings Flanagan gave information he had previously been given in e-mails. Flanagan also used actors on his television show ''Seatbelt Psychic'', whose lives were well documented and easily discoverable on social media.<ref name="Pizza">{{cite news |last1=Gerbic |first1=Susan|authorlink=Susan Gerbic |title=Operation Pizza Roll- Thomas John |url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/operation_pizza_roll_-_thomas_john|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190224032143/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/operation_pizza_roll_-_thomas_john|archive-date=February 24, 2019 |accessdate=February 23, 2019 |date=February 21, 2019}}</ref><ref name=Buckle>{{Cite web|url=https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/buckle_up_-_seatbelt_psychic|title=Buckle Up - Seatbelt Psychic|last=Gerbic|first=Susan|authorlink=Susan Gerbic|date=February 21, 2019|website=Center for Inquiry|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190224032258/https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/buckle_up_-_seatbelt_psychic|archive-date=February 24, 2019|url-status=|access-date=February 23, 2019}}</ref>


[[John Oliver]] speculated in a February 2019 segment of ''Last Week Tonight'', that [[Tyler Henry]] may use hot reading in addition to [[cold reading]]. As an example, Oliver dissected Henry's reading of [[Matt Lauer]] concerning the father-son fishing trip that was part of the reading. Oliver showed examples of publicly-available information about Lauer's love of fishing with his father, including Lauer stating this on his own show several times. Oliver summarized "Look, maybe Tyler Henry genuinely accessed the afterlife, an action which would fundamentally change our understanding of everything on Earth. Or maybe he just googled ‘Matt Lauer Dad’ and hit the fucking jackpot”.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/feb/25/john-oliver-last-week-tonight-recap-psychics|title=John Oliver on psychics: 'A vast underworld of unscrupulous vultures'|last=Horton|first=Adrian|date=February 25, 2019|work=The Guardian|access-date=February 25, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190225190230/https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/feb/25/john-oliver-last-week-tonight-recap-psychics|archive-date=February 25, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Mehta |first1=Hemant |title=John Oliver Exposed the Media’s Complicity in Promoting Psychic “Mediums” |url=https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/02/25/john-oliver-exposed-the-medias-complicity-in-promoting-psychic-mediums/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook&fbclid=IwAR2x1gmq6pVOLFNpFHj__qwtVUqVK2guxhIIBP8WPknfBhhN8Q6imyvs0h8 |website=Friendlyatheist.patheos.com |publisher=Patheos |accessdate=25 February 2019 |date=25 February 2019|dead-url=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Psychics: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhMGcp9xIhY |website=Youtube |publisher=LastWeekTonight |accessdate=25 February 2019}}</ref>
[[John Oliver]] speculated in a February 2019 segment of ''[[Last Week Tonight with John Oliver|Last Week Tonight]]'' that [[Tyler Henry]] may use hot reading in addition to [[cold reading]]. As an example, Oliver dissected Henry's reading of [[Matt Lauer]] concerning the father-son fishing trip that was part of the reading. Oliver showed examples of publicly available information about Lauer's love of fishing with his father, including Lauer stating this on his own show several times. Oliver summarized "Look, maybe Tyler Henry genuinely accessed the afterlife, an action which would fundamentally change our understanding of everything on Earth. Or maybe he just googled 'Matt Lauer Dad' and hit the fucking jackpot."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/feb/25/john-oliver-last-week-tonight-recap-psychics|title=John Oliver on psychics: 'A vast underworld of unscrupulous vultures'|last=Horton|first=Adrian|date=February 25, 2019|work=The Guardian|access-date=February 25, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190225190230/https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/feb/25/john-oliver-last-week-tonight-recap-psychics|archive-date=February 25, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Psychics: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhMGcp9xIhY |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211212/WhMGcp9xIhY| archive-date=2021-12-12 |url-status=live|website=Youtube |publisher=LastWeekTonight |accessdate=25 February 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref>


== See also == <!-- Please respect alphabetical order -->
== See also == <!-- Please respect alphabetical order -->
* [[Aura (paranormal)]]
* [[Barnum effect]]
* [[Barnum effect]]
* [[Confidence trick]]
* [[Confidence trick]]
Line 49: Line 47:
* [[Kinesics]]
* [[Kinesics]]
* [[List of parapsychology topics]]
* [[List of parapsychology topics]]
* [[List of topics characterized as pseudoscience]]
* [[Mentalism]]
* [[Mentalism]]
* [[Subjective validation]]
* [[Subjective validation]]
Line 59: Line 56:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hot Reading}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hot Reading}}
[[Category:Confidence tricks]]
[[Category:Confidence tricks]]
[[Category:Mentalism| ]]
[[Category:Mentalism|*]]

Latest revision as of 23:31, 15 December 2024

Hot reading is a technique used when giving a psychic reading in stage magic performances, or in other contexts. In hot reading, the reader uses information about the person receiving the reading (for example, from background research or overhearing a conversation) which the receiver is not aware that the reader already knows. Hot reading is commonly used in conjunction with cold reading (where no previously gathered information is used) and can explain how a psychic reader can get a specific claimed "hit" of accurate information.[1][2] The psychics may have clients schedule their appearance ahead of time, and then collect information using collaborators who pose as religious missionaries, magazine sales people, or similar roles.[3] Such visitors can gain a wide understanding of a person from examining their home, where tickets for the show may have been sent in advance. The "psychic" may then be briefed on the information, and told where the person will sit in the audience.[4]

History

[edit]

There are many methods that involve hot reading. In 1938, the magician John Mulholland wrote:[5]

Where do the mediums get the information? It is very easy. Look the person up in a telephone book. Talk to the corner grocer. Go to the house and try to sell a magazine subscription. Talk to the neighbours. Talk to the servants if there are any. If it is a small city go to the cemetery and look at the tombstones. It has to be done carefully but it is very easy.

Commenting on mediums from the early 20th century, historian Ruth Brandon noted:[6]

There were a number of recognized methods in use. Some were very down-to-earth. When a medium visited a new town, he was advised to visit the local cemetery and make a note of names, dates, and any other information to be obtained from the tombstones. He might also consult the "Blue Book" for the area, a compilation circulated among mediums listing, for an increasing number of places, the names of leading spiritualists likely to attend seances, with descriptions, family histories, and details (deceased spouses, children, parents, etc.) and other information likely to be of use.

Skeptical activist Susan Gerbic lists hot reading as one of a number of methods used by psychics to achieve their effects. She points out it can be done with nothing more than a name, location, and access to Facebook.[7]

Notable mediums from the past who were exposed as utilizing hot reading methods have included Rosina Thompson and George Valiantine.[8][9]

Modern examples of hot reading

[edit]

Televangelist Peter Popoff's wife, Elizabeth, was seen canvassing the crowd before a show, and it was later noticed that Popoff was wearing a hearing aid. In 1986, James Randi and his associate Steve Shaw, an illusionist known professionally as Banachek, organized Project Beta with technical assistance from the crime scene analyst and electronics expert Alexander Jason.[10] Using computerized radio scanners, Jason was able to demonstrate that Popoff's wife was using a wireless radio transmitter to broadcast information that she and her aides had culled from prayer request cards filled out by audience members. Popoff received the transmissions via an in-ear receiver and repeated the information to astonished audience members. Jason produced video segments interspersing the intercepted radio transmissions with Popoff's "miraculous" pronouncements.[11]

Independent Investigation Group IIG director James Underdown writes that in one of the live shows of Beyond they witnessed, James Van Praagh was observed signing books and chatting with a woman he learned was from Italy. During the taping he asked that same section if there was "someone from another country". To the TV audience this would have looked impressive when she raised her hand, however he had used the hot reading technique of gaining foreknowledge.[12][13]

A 2001 Time article reported that psychic John Edward allegedly used hot reading on his television show, Crossing Over, where an audience member who received a reading was suspicious of prior behaviour from Edward's aides, who had struck up conversations with audience members and asked them to fill out cards detailing their family trees.[14] In December 2001, Edward was alleged to have used foreknowledge to hot read in an interview on the television show Dateline, where a reading for a cameraman was based on knowledge gained in conversation some hours previously, yet presented as if he were unaware of the cameraman's background.[15] In his 2001 book, John Edward denied ever using foreknowledge, cold or hot reading.[16]

In March 2017, alleged psychic Thomas John Flanagan was found to have used information posted on social media by people coming to his shows, in order to accurately guess details about their lives while pretending to be communicating with the dead. He unknowingly used backstories from fake Facebook profiles previously prepared by a group of skeptics led by Susan Gerbic and Mark Edward. When Flanagan used that information while pretending to hear Gerbic's and Edward's dead relatives, the only possible way he could be aware of these details is if he or members of his team read the fake profiles while preparing for their performance, since even Gerbic and Edward themselves were not aware of the specific information placed on the profiles that matched the aliases they were using when attending the show. In 2021 Flanagan held an online meeting for children aged 5-12. Two of the supposed children had fake identities and one was much older than claimed (which Flanagan failed to detect). In his readings Flanagan gave information he had previously been given in e-mails. Flanagan also used actors on his television show Seatbelt Psychic, whose lives were well documented and easily discoverable on social media.[17][18]

John Oliver speculated in a February 2019 segment of Last Week Tonight that Tyler Henry may use hot reading in addition to cold reading. As an example, Oliver dissected Henry's reading of Matt Lauer concerning the father-son fishing trip that was part of the reading. Oliver showed examples of publicly available information about Lauer's love of fishing with his father, including Lauer stating this on his own show several times. Oliver summarized "Look, maybe Tyler Henry genuinely accessed the afterlife, an action which would fundamentally change our understanding of everything on Earth. Or maybe he just googled 'Matt Lauer Dad' and hit the fucking jackpot."[19][20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Robert Todd Carroll. "Hot Reading". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Retrieved 2006-06-14.
  2. ^ Colin Hunter. "Cold Reading: Confessions of a 'Psychic'". Skeptic Report. Archived from the original on 2007-09-23. Retrieved 2007-10-18.
  3. ^ Secrets of Psychics Revealed, NBC (2003)
  4. ^ Stagnaro, Angelo. Something from Nothing. Manipulix Books. 2004.
  5. ^ Mulholland, John (1938). Beware Familiar Spirits. Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 186. ISBN 0-684-16181-8
  6. ^ Brandon, Ruth. (1983). The Spiritualists: The Passion for the Occult in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 46. ISBN 0-297-78249-5
  7. ^ Gerbic, Susan. "Ten Tricks of the Psychics I Bet You Didn't Know". CSI. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
  8. ^ McCabe, Joseph. (1920). Is Spiritualism Based On Fraud? The Evidence Given By Sir A.C. Doyle and Others Drastically Examined. London Watts & Co. p. 138. "Dr. Hodgson, that quint mixture of blunt criticism and occasional credulity, had six sittings with her, and roundly stated that she was a fraud. The correct information which she gave him was, he said, taken from letters to which she had access, or from works of references like Who's Who. In one case, which made a great impression, she gave some remarkably abstruse and correct information. It was afterwards found that the facts were stated in an old diary which had belonged to her husband."
  9. ^ Tabori, Price (1966). Harry Price: The Biography of a Ghosthunter. Living Books. p. 120
  10. ^ Randi, James (February 22, 2008). "NEW FOR TAM6!". James Randi Educational Foundation.
  11. ^ Daniel, Danica (April 24, 2012). "Are You Ready For a Miracle? How Leap of Faith Jumped From the Movie Screen to Broadway". Broadway.com.
  12. ^ Underdown, James (Sep–Oct 2003). "TV psychics John Edward and John Van Praagh". Skeptical Inquirer. 27 (5): 41–45.
  13. ^ "How come TV psychics seem so convincing?". The Straight Dope. 2003-11-18. Retrieved 2011-03-12.
  14. ^ Leon Jaroff (2001-02-25). "Talking to the Dead". Time. Archived from the original on 2013-01-04. Retrieved 2006-06-14.
  15. ^ Joe Nickell. "John Edward: Hustling the Bereaved". CSICOP. Archived from the original on 2006-12-16. Retrieved 2006-06-14.
  16. ^ Edward, John (2001). Crossing Over. Jodere Group. ISBN 978-1-58872-002-3.
  17. ^ Gerbic, Susan (February 21, 2019). "Operation Pizza Roll- Thomas John". Archived from the original on February 24, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  18. ^ Gerbic, Susan (February 21, 2019). "Buckle Up - Seatbelt Psychic". Center for Inquiry. Archived from the original on February 24, 2019. Retrieved February 23, 2019.
  19. ^ Horton, Adrian (February 25, 2019). "John Oliver on psychics: 'A vast underworld of unscrupulous vultures'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 25, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
  20. ^ "Psychics: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)". Youtube. LastWeekTonight. Archived from the original on 2021-12-12. Retrieved 25 February 2019.