Talk:Amaranth: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
OneClickArchiver archived History to Talk:Amaranth/Archive 1 |
Mindmatrix (talk | contribs) revert - this is not a forum |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} |
{{talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1= |
|||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Biology|class=C}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=High}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=Mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Agriculture|importance=Mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Poetry|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Vietnam|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{WikiProject China|importance=mid}} |
|||
{{Wikiproject China|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
Line 20: | Line 19: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=90}} |
{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=90}} |
||
== Myth, legend and poetry == |
|||
Part of this section about the origin of the word amaranth is relevant. But the original meaning in Greek seems to refer to another plant, as the real amaranth comes from Mexico. So perhaps this section should be corrected. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:FRZH|FRZH]] ([[User talk:FRZH#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FRZH|contribs]]) 21:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:The whole section needs pruning. Please go ahead with editing. --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 22:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified (January 2018) == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified 2 external links on [[Amaranth]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/821578266|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929110929/http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/cp03803.html to http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/cp03803.html |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104004544/http://www.cropsforthefuture.org/crop-of-the-week-archive/grain-amaranth-amaranthus-spp-amaranthaceae/ to http://www.cropsforthefuture.org/crop-of-the-week-archive/grain-amaranth-amaranthus-spp-amaranthaceae/ |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Nutrition == |
|||
I'm not sure if I am editing the talk page correctly (apologies if I am not). |
|||
The nutrition section contains contradictory information on the protein content of amaranth. Specifically, one paragraph states that amaranth's protein content is 16-18% and compares this favorably to the protein content of wheat (14% or less). However, the nutrition section '''also''' states that "Uncooked amaranth grain is ... 14% protein," My assumption is that the 16% and 14% figures for amaranth come from two differing sources. I'm not sure what (if anything) should be done about the discrepancy, but it is confusing largely because the 16% figure is given as evidence of amaranth's superiority over wheat, but this evidence is then contradicted by the 14% figure. [[User:Pdanese|Pdanese]] ([[User talk:Pdanese|talk]]) 12:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:"One cup (2.4 dl, 245 g) of cooked amaranth grain (from about 65 g raw) provides 251 calories and is an excellent source (20% or more of the Daily Value, DV) of protein,..." This does not seem to bear out in math: recommended DV for protein according to the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Table 2-4, is 10 - 35%. Amaranth provides 8.814 g of protein per 65g raw, provided in the article. (8.814 g) * (4 cal/g) = 35.256 cal. Given the serving size of 251 cal, that is 17.628% of the daily recommended minimum 200 calories per day for a 2000 calorie diet. Moreover, the 35.25 cal of protein per 251 cal is only 14.0462% protein, which means that you are in the bottom range of the recommended 10 to 35% protein, if you eat only Amaranth, which implies that it is not an excellent source of protein. These values are also high as 4cal/g is an accepted rounding inaccuracy, where protein is actually less than 4 calories per gram. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.255.152.1|50.255.152.1]] ([[User talk:50.255.152.1#top|talk]]) 23:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::I restored the previous straightforward description of nutrition from reliable USDA data, as used across most nutrient tables in Wikipedia. {{u|Jde3bcu}} inserted [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Amaranth&diff=next&oldid=931777995#Nutrition this dubious and unconstructive edit to the nutrition section,] causing the confusion and discrepancies in discussing nutrients. Comparison of amaranth protein content or individual amino acids to other grains (wheat) is unnecessary and not supported by sources as reliable as the USDA. Trying to compare actual protein contents across different grains when using different sources (and their respective differences in collected material and analytical methods) is an exercise inevitably leading to confusion. Our goal in writing for Wikipedia is to present clear summary information, not a thesis-like discussion of all possible conditions and comparisons; [[WP:WEIGHT]]. --[[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 14:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:27, 16 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amaranth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class plant articles
- High-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- C-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- C-Class Poetry articles
- Low-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- C-Class Greek articles
- Low-importance Greek articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- C-Class Vietnam articles
- Mid-importance Vietnam articles
- All WikiProject Vietnam pages
- C-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles