Jump to content

Talk:Warsaw Uprising: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Milhist B-class
 
(322 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{ArticleHistory
{{Article history
|action1=FAC
|action1=FAC
|action1date=06:11, 20 Aug 2004
|action1date=06:11, 20 Aug 2004
Line 8: Line 9:


|action2=FTC
|action2=FTC
|action2date=22:40, 28 February 2006
|action2date=06:40, 29 April 2006
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Warsaw Uprising/archive1
|action2link=Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Warsaw Uprising/archive1
|action2result=not promoted
|action2result=not promoted
|action2oldid=41605392
|action2oldid=49518345


|action3=FAR
|action3=FAR
Line 27: Line 28:
|maindate=September 6, 2004
|maindate=September 6, 2004
|currentstatus=FFA
|currentstatus=FFA
|otd1date=2004-08-01|otd1oldid=4958385
|otd2date=2005-08-01|otd2oldid=19962564
|otd3date=2006-08-01|otd3oldid=67080318
|otd4date=2007-08-01|otd4oldid=148576156
|otd5date=2008-08-01|otd5oldid=229232090
|otd6date=2009-08-01|otd6oldid=305328378
|otd7date=2010-08-01|otd7oldid=376661996
|otd8date=2011-08-01|otd8oldid=442545373
|otd9date=2013-08-01|otd9oldid=566663145
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Poland
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Poland|importance=Top}}
|class=
{{WikiProject Soviet Union|importance=Mid|rus=yes|hist=yes|mil=yes|rus-importance=mid}}
|importance = Top
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|B1=n|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|German=y|Polish=y|WWII=y}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject European history|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=Top}}
}}
}}
{{To do|nopreload=yes|small=yes|7}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|portal1-name=War|portal1-link=Featured article/38|Polish=y|WWII=y}}
{{tmbox
{{todo|nopreload=yes|small=yes|7}}
|image=[[File:Commons-emblem-issue.svg|link=|alt=Commons-emblem-issue.svg|50px]]
{| class="infobox" width="270px"
|text=<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big>{{pb}}
|-
[[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland#Article sourcing expectations]] (9 May 2021):{{pb}}
!align="center"|[[Image:Vista-file-manager.png|50px|Archive]]<br/>[[Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page|Archives]]
The Arbitration Committee advises that administrators may impose "reliable-source consensus required" as a discretionary sanction on all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. On articles where "reliable-source consensus required" is in effect, when a source that is not a high quality source (an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journals, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution) is added and subsequently challenged by reversion, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the [[wikipedia:RSN|Reliable Sources Noticeboard]].{{pb}}
----
}}
|-
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|
|maxarchivesize = 200K
*[[Talk:Warsaw Uprising/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
|counter = 3
*[[Talk:Warsaw Uprising/Archive 2|Archive 2]]
|minthreadsleft = 5
|}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(365d)
|archive = Talk:Warsaw Uprising/Archive %(counter)d
}}

== Belorussia ==

It would be nice if someone could change "Belorussia" in the text to "Belarus". The text refers to a modern situation and current name for the country is "Belarus". [[User:Shapoklya78]] ([[User talk:Shapoklya78|talk]]) 18:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

== Link correction ==
{{Edit extended-protected|answered=yes}}

<!--Don't remove anything above this line.-->


* '''What I think should be changed (format using {{tl|textdiff}})''': <code><nowiki>[[Warsaw Uprising Square|Napoleon Square]]</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>[[Warsaw Insurgents Square (Warsaw)|Napoleon Square]]</nowiki></code> (2 times)
* '''Why it should be changed''': the page has been renamed, the link now directs to a disambiguation page
* '''References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button)''':

[[User:Baidax|Baidax]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Baidax|💬]]</sup> 11:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
<!--Don't remove anything below this line-->
{{reftalk}}
{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> [[User:HansVonStuttgart|HansVonStuttgart]] ([[User talk:HansVonStuttgart|talk]]) 11:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

:{{Reply|HansVonStuttgart}} thank you! — [[User:Baidax|Baidax]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Baidax|💬]]</sup> 11:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2024 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Warsaw Uprising|answered=yes}}
Please remove this sentence:

Recent scholarship since the fall of the Soviet Union, combined with eye witness accounts have called into question Soviet motives and suggest their lack of support for the Warsaw Uprising represented Soviet ambitions in Eastern Europe.

and add this in its place:

Scholarship since the fall of the Soviet Union, combined with eyewitness accounts, have questioned Soviet motives and suggested their lack of support for the Warsaw Uprising represented their ambitions in Eastern Europe.

A comma is missing, and it's a little wordy. [[Special:Contributions/123.51.107.94|123.51.107.94]] ([[User talk:123.51.107.94|talk]]) 06:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> [[User:Jamedeus|Jamedeus]] ([[User talk:Jamedeus|talk]]) 18:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


== Soviet Air Force in the infobox - how? ==
== Featured? The article needs a lot of work to be done. ==


Neither Stalin's air force, nor any other Soviet unit, helped in the Uprising. This is insulting and contrary to fact (see: Stalin's response why he will neither aid the Uprising directly nor even let the other Allies participating in the Airlift to land on freshly-Soviet-occupied Polish territory nearby, from Aug 21st, 1944). [[Special:Contributions/79.191.254.103|79.191.254.103]] ([[User talk:79.191.254.103|talk]]) 20:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
As per [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Warsaw_Uprising&diff=247773271&oldid=247759597 my edits], there is a huge amount of work to be done to meet the FA criteria. A small list of what should be done follows:
:I agree, there's not really much evidence that Soviet air forces dropped any supplies, even from the sources stated. The only evidence of any Soviet support was in fact from Polish units of the Red army - General Zygmunt Berling when they made costly landings Powiśle and even then Soviets declined to help there. [[User:Eastfarthingan|Eastfarthingan]] ([[User talk:Eastfarthingan|talk]]) 21:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
# Add references where needed (about 40 sentences for now, and I haven't fully read two sections...).
::Article reads "Between 13 and 30 September Soviet aircraft commenced their own re-supply missions, dropping arms, medicines and food supplies..." [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 16:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
# Look through [[Warsaw Uprising#W-hour|#W-hour]] and [[Warsaw Uprising#Capitulation|#Capitulation]] and correct all the untrue sentences, expand these section a bit.
# expand [[Warsaw Uprising#Eve of the battle|#Eve of the battle]] (and [[Lead up to the Warsaw Uprising]] as well) to cover more political and military reasons and actions taken by the AK just few days before the Uprising, [[Warsaw Uprising#Capitulation|#Capitulation]] to include information about the AK leaving Warsaw, about Gen. Okulicki taking the position of Commander of the Home Army and the reasons of Bór-Komorowski going to slavery, shorten [[Warsaw Uprising#Soviet stance|#Soviet stance]] (remove doubled information, write more about Berling's landings in Warsaw).
# do the whole to-do list (e.g. include [[Cultural representations of the Warsaw Uprising]] into the main article, polish the style, copy-edit, remove red links, proofread and so on)


== Archive links ==
I feel the article doesn't meet the FA criteria for now. There were and still are bits of untrue statements -- e.g. the sentence stating it was Bór-Komorowski who signed the capitulation order in the presence of von dem Bach-Zelewski. In fact, it was not him--the act of capitulation was signed by Kazimierz Iranek-Osmecki, Zygmunt Dobrowolski and Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski. The article contains many such examples and they all need to be re-written or removed. --[[User:Teodor Jan Ranicki|Teodor Jan Ranicki]] ([[User talk:Teodor Jan Ranicki|talk]]) 16:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


At least one of the links https://www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/Warsaw_Uprising/warsaw_uprising.html is dead. The archived link is https://web.archive.org/web/20210401024113/http://www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/Warsaw_Uprising/warsaw_uprising.html
:You can start right away, feel free to improve the article. By definition, no WP article is "ready". ''<font color="#901">//</font>''[[User:Halibutt|Halibu]][[User talk:Halibutt|tt]] 17:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
:I second Halibutt. WU has fallen behind our standards, and keeps on falling, despite our occasional attempts to improve it. Help from a new editor would be vastly appreciated! --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 18:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


I would fix it myself but I don't have 500 edits yet. [[User:VampiricDirewolf|VampiricDirewolf]] ([[User talk:VampiricDirewolf|talk]]) 18:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
== L-hour ==


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 September 2024 ==
I see in the [[Talk:Warsaw Uprising/Archive 1#Featured article objections|talk archive]] some discussion about "W-hour" as opposed to "L-hour". [http://www.polskieradio.pl/zagranica/news/artykul56337.html Polish radio] says "w" stands for "battle for freedom". Davies admits in a frustratingly patronising way that he's translated as many Polish words as possible into English. (He also contracts everyone's surnames to an initial letter because he thinks Polish surnames are too difficult for English readers. Paradoxically, I find this makes his book more difficult to read rather than less.) Anyhow, I wonder if his "L-hour" is "Liberation-hour"? I don't speak Polish, but an internet-based translation gives "Wybawienie" as meaning "Liberation". Any comments? [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 11:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


{{edit extended-protected|Warsaw Uprising|answered=yes}}
:Ah, Davies, p.430, does says "L" stood for Liberation. I think this may be a fair but loose translation of "Wybuch". [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 08:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Change Waraw to Warsaw, just a typo [[User:Jaccount12|Jaccount12]] ([[User talk:Jaccount12|talk]]) 23:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
::It may not. "W" in the W-hour probably means "Wybuch", but I also recall seeing it could stand for "Wystąpienie"; however, both of these words do not mean "Liberation" ("Wybawienie"). I will have to look it up in some archives ("Polskie Siły Zbrojne", v. III "Armia Krajowa" should do), as neither Kirchmayer, nor Borkiewicz go into details in here; the Internet isn't a good source in here as well, as results in Google do vary a lot. [[user:odder|Tomasz W. Kozłowski]] ([[user talk:odder|talk]]) 13:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
:::My first thought would be ''w for wolność'' (Polish for freedom...). Second - ''wyzwolenie'' (liberation). --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 05:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
::::OK, I went to library yesterday and looked the whole thing up in some books ("Polskie Siły Zbrojne", "Studium Polski Podziemnej" -- google it for more information). As far as I see, and I have seen the original plan of Rowecki [Raport Operacyjny W-154], there was no information about what does the "W" letter stand for. However, Rowecki has mentioned the word "wybuch" (outbreak), so we can suspect it is what "W" means. There are two ways, then: (1) no specification of "W" was given and (2) the meaning of the letter was given in the interior correspondence and orders of AK, not in the correspondence between AK's Commander and Commander in Chief. Any ideas how to solve this problem? [[user:odder|Tomasz W. Kozłowski]] ([[user talk:odder|talk]]) 12:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


Andrew Borowiec, who fought in the uprising, says in his book (p. 79) that "W" stands for ''walka'' meaning "combat". [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 09:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> Thank you. [[User:Rainsage|Rainsage]] ([[User talk:Rainsage|talk]]) 06:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)


==Weapons==
== Ukraine ==
Weapon list on 1 August: "300 machine pistols" and "60 submachine guns", is wrong, but I don't know what author understood under this terms. There was probably not one [[machine pistol]] in the whole uprising - most probably it refers simply to [[submachine gun]]s, but what is 60 then? [[User:Pibwl|Pibwl]] [[User_talk:Pibwl|&larr;&laquo;]] 23:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


Ukrainian divisions in Wehrmacht took part in the suppressed Warsaw Uprising. Source:[http://www.sppw1944.org/powstanie/cudzoziemcy_02_eng.html]http://www.sppw1944.org/powstanie/cudzoziemcy_02_eng.html [[Special:Contributions/2A00:20:D004:9F0D:8C27:60C5:C76F:26ED|2A00:20:D004:9F0D:8C27:60C5:C76F:26ED]] ([[User talk:2A00:20:D004:9F0D:8C27:60C5:C76F:26ED|talk]]) 22:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
:You're probably right. I don't know much about firearms but I'm guessing that one of these (probably the 300) is supposed to be the [[Blyskawica]] gun which in the relevant article is interchangeably called either "submachine gun" or "machine pistol". It's possible that the 60 refers to RKMs - not sure what the English translation is but I think they were [[Light machine gun]]s - maybe like an earlier version of the Soviet [[RPK]]s. That seems like a lot of RKMs though.[[User:Radeksz|radek]] ([[User talk:Radeksz|talk]]) 00:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
::Right, an equivalent of RKM is LMG (although LMG covers also somewhat heavier weapons, known in Poland as LKM, like Lewis gun, or UKM, like MG-34 ("universal machine gun")). The correct English term for weapons like Błyskawica and MP40 is submachine gun (a confusion might come from a fact, that submachine gun in Polish is "pistolet maszynowy"). [[User:Pibwl|Pibwl]] [[User_talk:Pibwl|&larr;&laquo;]] 14:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
:::I've changed this to "300 submachine guns" and "60 assault rifles", as estimated by [[:pl:Aleksander Gieysztor]] and given by [[:pl:Władysław Bartoszewski]], but I don't know the makes. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 08:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Seems probable. Only assault rifles available could be MP-43/Stg-44. Submachine guns were of course a variety of Stens, Błyskawicas, MP-38s/-40s and other less popular models. [[User:Pibwl|Pibwl]] [[User_talk:Pibwl|&larr;&laquo;]] 01:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


== Reference number 19 (a PDF) no longer accessible ==
Can we get a ref for the number of weapons produced/captured during the uprising? I've added the refs for the vehicles and some other items; one of the captured SdKfz's even has an article on pl wiki: [[:pl:Szary Wilk (transporter opancerzony)]].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 05:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


As the title says, reference 19 which links to a PDF from the page www.warsawuprising.com is no longer accessible, and should either be found and archived or replaced with something else [[User:SRAbian|SRAbian]] ([[User talk:SRAbian|talk]]) 11:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
:I've removed Tiger tank - where did you find it? :-) There were certainly none on the Polish side - unless some miraculous source has been discovered recently, that I don't know about :-) (there was probably one PzKpfw-IV captured, but it was lost some hour after, in a stupid way, without any combat action, when a soldier just drove it accidentally towards the German side). And there was also Jagdpanzer 38 captured, which might be added, but it stood in vain as a reserve, until a building collapsed upon it. [[User:Pibwl|Pibwl]] [[User_talk:Pibwl|&larr;&laquo;]] 01:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
::Tiger is mentioned here: "[http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pol/polot_2.htm German Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger. One tank was captured on August 4th in Ochota district. It was pressed into service but was lost on the same day.]" --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 04:52, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
:::There's no reliable source saying it was Tiger. Probably it refers to the same vehicle, which, according to Jan Tarczyński "Pojazdy powstania warszawskiego", was most probably PzKpfw.IV (there is no material reference). However, due to its very short career, lack of combat usage, and probably even lack of "commissioning" as insurgent vehicle, it's not worth to be mentioned as insurgents' weapon. On contrary, two Panthers created an "armoured platoon" and were actively used. I have doubts if Jagdpanzer 38 deserves to be listed - it could be used, but it wasn't. [[User:Pibwl|Pibwl]] [[User_talk:Pibwl|&larr;&laquo;]] 19:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


== The Battles on the eastern side of the Vistula, south of the Narew between July and November 1944 are somewhat misrepresented by the text. ==
== A question ==


Colonel Douglas E. Nash Sr. had published "From the Realm of a Dying Sun: IV. SS-Panzerkorps and the Battles for Warsaw, July–November 1944." Nash is a well accredited military historian and his book adds much detail to Colonel David Glantz's descriptions of the struggle around Praga.
I don't understand the sentence "It became obvious that the advancing Red Army might not come to Poland as a liberator but rather as "our Allies' ally."[8]" Could the editors make it clear? [[User:Vb|Vb]] ([[User talk:Vb|talk]]) 11:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
This quote really minimises German resistance: "In three days the Soviets quickly gained control of the suburb, a few hundred meters from the main battle on the other side of the river, as the resistance by the German 73rd Division collapsed quickly."
:Ally of our allies doesn't mean our ally. I am not sure how to make it more clear...? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 05:27, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
In fact there were five elite panzer divisions involved including the extremely powerful 3rd SS Panzer Division Totenkopf, as well as the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking, 25th Panzer Division, 19th Panzer Division and 3rd Panzer Division. There were also German and Hungarian Infantry Divisions.
According to Nash, during the 3 battles of Warsaw from July to November, the Soviet forces suffered 277,407 casualties. This is a huge number and puts perspective on the cost to the 1st Belorussian Front.
A similar limited description of Operation Bagration is provided: "These two flanking operations were colossal defeats for the German army and completely destroyed a large number of German formations." No mention is made of the 770,888 Soviet casualties (from Wikipedia). Again, the high (2:1) Soviet casualty rate is ignored - German losses were 300,000 to 500,000 (Wikipedia). The cost of Soviet victory was extremely high throughout the war.
As Nash points out the charge at Warsaw by the Soviet 2nd Tank Army was not well planned and was completely uncoordinated with the Polish Home Army. It was disastrous for both as the severe German response caused huge loss of life.
Listing just the German and Polish casualties, I feel, does not do justice to the sacrifice of the brave troops who fought in Soviet formations. Minimising German resistance is counter-factual. [[User:ZZZZYeti|ZZZZYeti]] ([[User talk:ZZZZYeti|talk]]) 22:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:24, 16 December 2024

Former featured articleWarsaw Uprising is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 6, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 20, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
April 29, 2006Featured topic candidateNot promoted
July 8, 2007Featured article reviewKept
February 25, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 1, 2004, August 1, 2005, August 1, 2006, August 1, 2007, August 1, 2008, August 1, 2009, August 1, 2010, August 1, 2011, and August 1, 2013.
Current status: Former featured article

Belorussia

[edit]

It would be nice if someone could change "Belorussia" in the text to "Belarus". The text refers to a modern situation and current name for the country is "Belarus". User:Shapoklya78 (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]


  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}): [[Warsaw Uprising Square|Napoleon Square]] to [[Warsaw Insurgents Square (Warsaw)|Napoleon Square]] (2 times)
  • Why it should be changed: the page has been renamed, the link now directs to a disambiguation page
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Baidax 💬 11:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

 Done HansVonStuttgart (talk) 11:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HansVonStuttgart: thank you! — Baidax 💬 11:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2024

[edit]

Please remove this sentence:

Recent scholarship since the fall of the Soviet Union, combined with eye witness accounts have called into question Soviet motives and suggest their lack of support for the Warsaw Uprising represented Soviet ambitions in Eastern Europe.

and add this in its place:

Scholarship since the fall of the Soviet Union, combined with eyewitness accounts, have questioned Soviet motives and suggested their lack of support for the Warsaw Uprising represented their ambitions in Eastern Europe.

A comma is missing, and it's a little wordy. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 06:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Jamedeus (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet Air Force in the infobox - how?

[edit]

Neither Stalin's air force, nor any other Soviet unit, helped in the Uprising. This is insulting and contrary to fact (see: Stalin's response why he will neither aid the Uprising directly nor even let the other Allies participating in the Airlift to land on freshly-Soviet-occupied Polish territory nearby, from Aug 21st, 1944). 79.191.254.103 (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there's not really much evidence that Soviet air forces dropped any supplies, even from the sources stated. The only evidence of any Soviet support was in fact from Polish units of the Red army - General Zygmunt Berling when they made costly landings Powiśle and even then Soviets declined to help there. Eastfarthingan (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Article reads "Between 13 and 30 September Soviet aircraft commenced their own re-supply missions, dropping arms, medicines and food supplies..." DrKay (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

At least one of the links https://www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/Warsaw_Uprising/warsaw_uprising.html is dead. The archived link is https://web.archive.org/web/20210401024113/http://www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/Warsaw_Uprising/warsaw_uprising.html

I would fix it myself but I don't have 500 edits yet. VampiricDirewolf (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 September 2024

[edit]

Change Waraw to Warsaw, just a typo Jaccount12 (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thank you. Rainsage (talk) 06:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ukraine

[edit]

Ukrainian divisions in Wehrmacht took part in the suppressed Warsaw Uprising. Source:[1]http://www.sppw1944.org/powstanie/cudzoziemcy_02_eng.html 2A00:20:D004:9F0D:8C27:60C5:C76F:26ED (talk) 22:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference number 19 (a PDF) no longer accessible

[edit]

As the title says, reference 19 which links to a PDF from the page www.warsawuprising.com is no longer accessible, and should either be found and archived or replaced with something else SRAbian (talk) 11:42, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Battles on the eastern side of the Vistula, south of the Narew between July and November 1944 are somewhat misrepresented by the text.

[edit]

Colonel Douglas E. Nash Sr. had published "From the Realm of a Dying Sun: IV. SS-Panzerkorps and the Battles for Warsaw, July–November 1944." Nash is a well accredited military historian and his book adds much detail to Colonel David Glantz's descriptions of the struggle around Praga. This quote really minimises German resistance: "In three days the Soviets quickly gained control of the suburb, a few hundred meters from the main battle on the other side of the river, as the resistance by the German 73rd Division collapsed quickly." In fact there were five elite panzer divisions involved including the extremely powerful 3rd SS Panzer Division Totenkopf, as well as the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking, 25th Panzer Division, 19th Panzer Division and 3rd Panzer Division. There were also German and Hungarian Infantry Divisions. According to Nash, during the 3 battles of Warsaw from July to November, the Soviet forces suffered 277,407 casualties. This is a huge number and puts perspective on the cost to the 1st Belorussian Front. A similar limited description of Operation Bagration is provided: "These two flanking operations were colossal defeats for the German army and completely destroyed a large number of German formations." No mention is made of the 770,888 Soviet casualties (from Wikipedia). Again, the high (2:1) Soviet casualty rate is ignored - German losses were 300,000 to 500,000 (Wikipedia). The cost of Soviet victory was extremely high throughout the war. As Nash points out the charge at Warsaw by the Soviet 2nd Tank Army was not well planned and was completely uncoordinated with the Polish Home Army. It was disastrous for both as the severe German response caused huge loss of life. Listing just the German and Polish casualties, I feel, does not do justice to the sacrifice of the brave troops who fought in Soviet formations. Minimising German resistance is counter-factual. ZZZZYeti (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]