Jump to content

Susan Bordo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m copy editing
SdkbBot (talk | contribs)
m Removed erroneous space and general fixes (task 1)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}


'''Susan Bordo''' is an American [[philosopher]] work in contemporary [[cultural studies]], with a particular focus on [[feminist theory]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schuessler |first=Jennifer |date=2013-04-14 |title=For One Royal, History Has Added Insult to Injury |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/books/the-creation-of-anne-boleyn-by-susan-bordo.html |access-date=2023-06-29 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Her scholarship examines the intersection of culture and the body, addressing topics such as eating disorders, including [[anorexia nervosa]] and [[bulimia nervosa]], plastic surgery, ideals of beauty, [[racism]] and the body, [[masculinity]], and [[sexual harassment]].
'''Susan Bordo''' is an American [[philosopher]] known for her contributions in the field of contemporary [[cultural studies]], particularly in the area of "body studies".{{Citation needed|date=March 2023}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
Bordo's writing contributes to a body of feminist, cultural and [[gender studies]], linking modern [[consumer culture]] directly to the formation of [[gender]]ed bodies. She is known for her ''Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body'' (1993), a text that looks at the impact of [[popular culture]] (television, advertisements, and magazines, for example) in shaping the female body while also looking at typical female disorders such as [[hysteria]], [[agoraphobia]], [[anorexia nervosa]] and [[bulimia]] as "complex crystallizations of culture."<ref name=uw35>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 35.</ref> Bordo has also garnered attention for her more recent book "''The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and Private"''(1999), a text which Bordo describes as being "a personal/cultural exploration of the male body from a woman's point of view." According to her [[University of Kentucky]] profile, the book has appeared in magazines such as [[Mademoiselle (magazine)|Mademoiselle]] and [[Vanity Fair (magazine)|Vanity Fair]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=bordo |url=https://gws.as.uky.edu/users/bordo |access-date=2023-03-28 |website=gws.as.uky.edu |language=en}}</ref>
Bordo's work contributes to feminist, cultural, and [[gender studies]], focusing on the connections between [[consumer culture]] and the construction of [[gender]]ed bodies. Her 1993 book ''Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body'' examined how [[popular culture]] shapes perceptions of the female body. It also discusses conditions like [[hysteria]], [[agoraphobia]], anorexia nervosa, and bulimia as "complex crystallizations of culture."<ref name=uw35>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 35.</ref>


Bordo's 1999 book ''The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and Private'' examined cultural and personal perspectives on the male body from a woman's perspective.<ref>{{Cite web |title=bordo |url=https://gws.as.uky.edu/users/bordo |access-date=2023-03-28 |website=gws.as.uky.edu |language=en}}</ref>
==Education and professional career==

Raised in [[Newark, New Jersey]], Bordo graduated in 1964 from [[Weequahic High School]].<ref>[http://weequahicalumni.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Distinguished-Weequahic-Alumni-Revised-01-12-18.pdf Distinguished Weequahic Alumni], Weequahic High School Alumni Association. Accessed December 19, 2019. "Susan Klein Bordo (1964) a Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky."</ref> She received her [[Ph.D.]] from the [[State University of New York at Stony Brook]] in 1982. She currently holds the Otis A. Singletary Chair in the Humanities at the [[University of Kentucky]], where she teaches [[English Studies|English]] and [[Women's studies]]. Bordo specializes in contemporary culture and its relation to the body, focusing on modern female disorders such as anorexia and bulimia, cosmetic surgery, beauty, and [[evolution]]ary theory. She also explores [[racism]] and the body, [[masculinity]], and [[sexual harassment]].
==Education and career==
Bordo was raised in [[Newark, New Jersey]] and graduated from [[Weequahic High School]] in 1964.<ref>[http://weequahicalumni.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Distinguished-Weequahic-Alumni-Revised-01-12-18.pdf Distinguished Weequahic Alumni], Weequahic High School Alumni Association. Accessed December 19, 2019. "Susan Klein Bordo (1964) a Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky."</ref> She received her [[Ph.D.]] from [[Stony Brook University]] in 1982. Bordo is the Otis A. Singletary Chair in the Humanities at the [[University of Kentucky]], where she teaches [[English studies|English]] and [[women's studies]].


==Theoretical context==
==Theoretical context==


===Philosophical discourse===
===Philosophical discourse===
While Bordo's writing works to "reach outside the [[academic]] world,"<ref name=l2360>Leitch, p. 2360.</ref> her [[prose]] and critiques of modern culture in relation to subject, gender, and body formations are nonetheless grounded in [[literary theory|theoretical]] frameworks. Bordo's work reflects a background in philosophical [[discourse]] in which issues of [[rationality]], [[Objectivity (philosophy)|objectivity]], and [[Cartesian dualism]] are explored and used to situate the body within culture historically.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 4.</ref> Bordo claims that "[w]hat remains the constant element throughout historical variation is the construction of body as something apart from the true self (whether conceived as [[soul]], [[mind]], spirit, will, [[creativity]], freedom . . .) and as undermining the best efforts of that self."<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 5.</ref> She traces the "body" as a [[concept]] and as a material "thing" back to [[Plato]], [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]], and the [[Bible]] revealing how the body has been viewed as "animal, as appetite, as deceiver, as prisoner of the soul and confounder of its projects."<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 3.</ref> She also traces the [[Mind-body dualism|dualistic]] nature of the mind/body connection by examining the early philosophies of [[Aristotle]], [[Hegel]], and [[Descartes]], revealing how distinguishing [[Wiktionary:binary|binaries]] such as spirit/[[matter]] and male activity/female passivity have worked to solidify gender characteristics and categorization. Bordo proceeds to point out that while men have historically been associated with the intellect and the mind or spirit, women have long been associated with the body, the subordinated, negatively imbued term in the mind/body [[dichotomy]].
Bordo's writing aims to engage audiences beyond the academic sphere while remaining firmly rooted in [[Literary theory|theoretical]] frameworks.<ref name=l2360>Leitch, p. 2360.</ref> Her work draws on philosophical discourse to examine issues such as [[rationality]], [[Objectivity (science)|objectivity]], and [[Mind–body dualism|mind-body dualism]], situating the body within historical and cultural contexts.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 4.</ref> Bordo argues that throughout history, the body has been constructed as separate from the "true self"—variously conceived as soul, mind, spirit, will, creativity, or freedom—and as an entity that undermines the efforts of that self.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 5.</ref> She traces the concept of the body to writers such as [[Plato]], [[Augustine of Hippo]], and the authors of the [[Bible]], which have portrayed the body as animalistic, appetitive, deceptive, and a prison for the soul.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 3.</ref>

Bordo has examined the dualistic nature of the mind-body relationship through the philosophies of [[Aristotle]], [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]], and [[René Descartes]]. She has analyzed how binaries such as spirit/matter and male activity/female passivity have historically reinforced gender roles and categorizations. According to Bordo, these dualisms have positioned men as aligned with intellect and the mind or spirit, while women have been associated with the body, often the subordinate and negatively connoted term in this dichotomy.


===Materialism===
===Materialism===
Bordo argues that "knowledge is 'embodied,' produced from a 'standpoint,' by a body that is located as a material entity among other material entities."<ref name=l2360/> She is therefore situated within a [[materialism|materialist]] framework, for, as [[Susan Hekman]] points out, "Bordo's emphasis on the materiality of the body, what most of us would call the 'real' body, is a function of her central theoretical conviction."<ref name=hrev/> Situating Bordo within a [[feminist theory|feminist]] and materialist theoretical context, her work is often compared and contrasted with [[Judith Butler]]'s writing, which deals with gender formation and the body. Hekman provides analyses of Bordo's situatedness within materialist discourse and suggests both differences and similarities in the theoretical concerns of Bordo and Butler. While Bordo at times implies the body is a text to be inscribed upon and interpreted, she also emphasizes the materiality and locatedness of bodies within [[Western culture]], whereas Butler's work on the body reflects a greater affiliation with [[postmodern]] thought in "treat[ing] the body as pure text."<ref name=hrev>Hekman, Review</ref> Bordo questions such a purely textual body for "If the body is treated as pure text, subversive, destabilizing elements can be emphasized and freedom and self-determination celebrated; but one is left wondering, is there a body in this text?"<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 38.</ref> For Bordo, it is the "cultural definitions of the ''body'' and its materiality as they are given to us" that must be resisted, and therefore "real" bodies "must be the focus of feminist analysis and, significantly, feminist resistance."<ref>Hekman, "Material Bodies", p. 65.</ref>
Bordo argues that "knowledge is 'embodied,' produced from a 'standpoint,' by a body that exists as a material entity among other material entities."<ref name=l2360/> This view places her within a [[Materialism|materialist]] framework, as [[Susan Hekman]] has noted, emphasizing Bordo's focus on the materiality of the body, often referred to as the "real" body.<ref name=hrev/> Bordo's work is frequently compared and contrasted to that of [[Judith Butler]].

Bordo has compared to the body as a text to be inscribed upon and interpreted but emphasizes its material and situated nature within Western culture. In contrast, Butler aligns more with postmodern theory, treating the body as "pure text."<ref name="hrev">Hekman, Review</ref> Bordo has critiqued this approach, observing that treating the body as pure text highlights "subversive" and "destabilizing" elements while celebrating freedom and self-determination but may overlook the material aspects of the body.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 38.</ref> Bordo has argued that cultural definitions of the body and its materiality must be resisted and insists that "real" bodies remain central to feminist analysis and resistance.<ref>Hekman, "Material Bodies", p. 65.</ref>


===Feminism===
===Feminism===
Bordo's critique of gendered, and particularly feminine, bodies stems from both feminist and [[gender studies]] [[methodologies]]. She critiques, re-evaluates, and reconfigures old and new feminist methodology, not excluding certain earlier feminist concerns that focused on the dichotomies of oppressor/oppressed and victimizer/victim, but re-evaluating their effectiveness and application to contemporary feminine concerns. As Bordo points out, feminism of the late 1960s and 1970s viewed "the female body [as] a socially shaped and historically 'colonized' territory."<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 21.</ref> Such a view, she claims, classifies women and the female body predominantly as victims, living passively/submissively within a patriarchal society, a [[tabula rasa]] awaiting inscription. Intending to go beyond such a classification, Bordo writes that new feminist critiques looked more towards "racial, economic and class differences among women" while also looking at "both women's collusions with [[patriarchy|patriarchal]] culture and their frequent efforts at resistance."<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 23.</ref>
Bordo's critique of gendered, particularly feminine, bodies incorporates methodologies from feminist and gender studies. She has re-examined and modified other feminist approaches, including those that focused on dichotomies like oppressor/oppressed and victimizer/victim. Bordo has noted that [[second-wave feminism]] often regarded "the female body [as] a socially shaped and historically 'colonized' territory,"<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 21.</ref> a perspective that, she argues, framed women and their bodies primarily as passive victims within a [[Patriarchy|patriarchal]] society. Bordo has highlighted newer feminist critiques that focus on "racial, economic and class differences among women" and examine both women's participation in patriarchal culture and their efforts to resist it.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 23.</ref>


===Cultural studies===
===Cultural studies===
While situated within feminist and gender studies frameworks, Bordo's theories also stem from a [[cultural studies]] approach where the power of cultural phenomena such as [[television]], [[advertising]] and popular magazines are analyzed in terms of means of domination and of resistance. While certain cultural theorists, for example [[John Fiske (media scholar)|John Fiske]], who wrote ''Television Culture'' (1990), see elements of culture like television as "demonstrating the way representational codes and techniques shape our perception" but also as a means for resistance, where audience members could "decode" such messages and thus be able to "think resistantly about their lives,"<ref name=l1026>Leitch, p. 1026.</ref> Bordo sees cultural coding as a more pernicious, binding and overwhelming force. For Bordo "the rules of femininity have come to be culturally transmitted more and more through the deployment of standardized visual images";<ref>Bordo, "The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity", p. 17.</ref> cultural transmitters such as television and print media work insidiously to "impose models of bodily beauty that get construed as freely chosen options by those victimized by them."<ref name=l1026/>
Situated within feminist and gender studies frameworks, Bordo's theories also draw from [[cultural studies]], analyzing the influence of [[mass media]] as tools of domination and resistance. While some cultural theorists, such as [[John Fiske (media scholar)|John Fiske]] in ''Television Culture'' (1990), view media as shaping perception through representational codes while also offering opportunities for resistance through audience reinterpretation,<ref name=l1026>Leitch, p. 1026.</ref> Bordo has taken a more critical stance. She has argued that cultural codes function as pervasive and constraining forces. According to Bordo, "the rules of femininity have come to be culturally transmitted more and more through the deployment of standardized visual images,"<ref>Bordo, "The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity", p. 17.</ref> with mass media insidiously imposing ideals of bodily beauty that are perceived by those affected as freely chosen options.<ref name=l1026/>


===Post structuralism===
===Post-structuralism===
Bordo's work on culture, power, and gender formation is influenced in part by [[Post-structuralism|post-structuralist]]. Susan Hekman notes that Bordo, like many contemporary feminist theorists,<ref name=hrev/> advocates for a selective application of postmodern theories. Bordo’s works use [[Michel Foucault]]'s frameworks to critique and analyze "the normative feminine practices of our culture."<ref name=uw27>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 27.</ref>
The notions of culture, power and gender/subject formation that dominate Bordo's writing arise in some degree from [[poststructuralism|poststructuralist]] thought. Susan Hekman points out that "[l]ike an increasing number of contemporary feminist theorists [Bordo] argues for a selective use of [[postmodern]] theories"<ref name=hrev/> and one way Bordo's work can be seen in a poststructuralist/postmodernist light is through her usage of Foucauldian methodology. Bordo appropriates the ideas of [[Michel Foucault]] in critiquing, analyzing and bringing to light "the normative feminine practices of our culture."<ref name=uw27>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 27.</ref> As Bordo points out, Foucault saw power not "as the ''possession'' of individuals or groups" but "as a dynamic or network of non-centralized forces,"<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 26.</ref> and such a depiction of power relations is therefore useful in a critique of gender formation/regulation. If, in a Foucauldian sense, power works from below, then "prevailing forms of selfhood and subjectivity (gender among them) are maintained, not chiefly through physical restraint and coercion (although social relations may certainly contain such elements), but through individual [[panopticon|self-surveillance]] and self-correction to norms."<ref name=uw27/> Foucault's theories of power and discipline along with theories on [[human sexuality|sexuality]] serve contemporary feminist aims in revealing how cultural normative practices, expressed through popular media, work to influence femininity (and gendered bodies in general) into homogeneity while at the same time seeming freely chosen. "Like Foucault, [Bordo] focuses on the discourses through which [[society]] produces, understands, defines, and interprets the female body."<ref>Leitch, p. 2361.</ref>

Bordo has written in favor of Foucault's conceptualization of power as a network of decentralized forces for understanding the formation and regulation of gender.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 26.</ref> In this framework, power operates from below, meaning that societal norms, including gender, are maintained less through coercion and more through self-surveillance and self-regulation.<ref name="uw27" /> Bordo, like Foucault, has focused on the societal discourses that produce, define, and interpret the female body.<ref>Leitch, p. 2361.</ref>


==Writing==
==Writing==


===''The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture'' (1987)===
===''The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture'' (1987)===
''The Flight to Objectivity'' represents what Bordo refers to as a "fresh approach" to Descartes' ''Meditations''. She critiques the stable notion of [[Objectivity (philosophy)|objectivity]] and [[knowledge]] inherent in Cartesian thought, notions that, in our contemporary society, have become critically distanced, for "[t]he limitations of [[science]] and the interested, even ideological nature of all human pursuits now seem unavoidable recognitions."<ref>Bordo, ''The Flight to Objectivity'', p. 2.</ref> Bordo suggests that rather than viewing Descartes from a "coherent abstract or ahistorical" perspective, we need to approach Descartes' philosophical arguments within "the context of the cultural pressures that gave rise to them."<ref>Bordo, ''The Flight to Objectivity'', p. 3.</ref> Susan Hekman notes that Bordo's ''The Flight to Objectivity'', while not overtly dealing with theorizations of the body, does point to the fact that "the origin of our culture's text for the body, and particularly the female body, is the work of Descartes."<ref>Bordo, ''The Flight to Objectivity'', p. 62.</ref><!--is this an error? maybe should be Hekman p62--> The Cartesian division of the mind and the body, where the body is the "prison that the mind must escape to achieve knowledge,"<ref>Hekman, "Material Bodies", p. 62.</ref> guides Bordo's further analyses of culturally influenced bodies and the shaping of the female body in particular.
Bordo has described ''The Flight to Objectivity'' as a "fresh approach" to René Descartes' 1641 work ''[[Meditations on First Philosophy]].'' In ''The Flight to Objectivity'', Bordo critiqued the stable notions of objectivity and knowledge central to Cartesian thought, which she argued have become increasingly questioned in contemporary society. She highlighted the "limitations of science and the interested, even ideological nature of all human pursuits," asserting that such critiques are now unavoidable.<ref>Bordo, ''The Flight to Objectivity'', p. 2.</ref> Bordo proposed that Descartes’ arguments should be understood not as abstract or ahistorical but within the cultural context that shaped them.<ref>Bordo, ''The Flight to Objectivity'', p. 3.</ref>

Susan Hekman observes that while ''The Flight to Objectivity'' does not directly theorize the body, it identifies Descartes' work as foundational to cultural conceptions of the body, particularly the female body.<ref>Bordo, ''The Flight to Objectivity'', p. 62.</ref><!--is this an error? maybe should be Hekman p62--> Bordo examined the Cartesian dualism of mind and body, where the body is depicted as a "prison that the mind must escape to achieve knowledge."<ref>Hekman, "Material Bodies", p. 62.</ref> This framework informed Bordo's broader analyses of how cultural forces shape perceptions of the body, with particular attention to the female body.


===''Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body'' (1993)===
===''Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body'' (1993)===
Bordo's ''Unbearable Weight'' presents a collection of essays that focus on the body's situatedness and construction in Western Society and offers "a cultural approach to the body."<ref name=uw35/> Bordo looks at "obsessive body practices of contemporary culture" and claims that her aim "is not to portray these obsessions as bizarre or anomalous, but, rather, as the logical (if extreme) manifestations of anxieties and fantasies fostered by our culture."<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 15.</ref> Practices such as [[cosmetic surgery]], obsessive [[dieting]] and [[physical training]] represent, for Bordo, how cultural "representations homogenize" and how "these homogenized images normalize."<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 24-25.</ref> ''Unbearable Weight'' also traces the connection between culture and female disorders and Bordo emphasizes the fact that disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia cannot simply be defined from [[medical]] and [[psychological]] standpoints but must be viewed from within a cultural context, as "complex crystallizations of culture."<ref name=uw35/> It is through such female disorders that resistance to dominant [[ideological]] constructs are seemingly played out; however, such a resistance reveals the devastating effects of culture on the contemporary female body. In 2003, the tenth anniversary reissue edition of ''Unbearable Weight'' was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize after its original release date. In the reissue of the book, Bordo considers the cultural images of the female body within the framework of the patriarchy, contemporary feminism, and postindustrial capitalism.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The encyclopedia of literary and cultural theory|last=Waters|first=Melanie|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell Publishing|year=2011|isbn=9781405183123}}</ref>
Bordo's ''Unbearable Weight'' is a collection of essays that examines the body's construction and positioning within Western society, offering what Bordo describes as "a cultural approach to the body."<ref name=uw35/> The book analyzes "obsessive body practices of contemporary culture," such as [[plastic surgery]], extreme dieting, and rigorous physical training, framing them not as anomalies but as "logical (if extreme) manifestations of anxieties and fantasies fostered by our culture." Bordo argued that these practices illustrate how cultural representations homogenize ideals and how these homogenized images become normalized.<ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 15.</ref><ref>Bordo, ''Unbearable Weight'', p. 24-25.</ref>

''Unbearable Weight'' also explores the relationship between culture and disorders like anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Bordo contended that such disorders cannot be fully understood through medical or psychological perspectives alone but must be viewed as "complex crystallizations of culture."<ref name="uw35" /> She argued that while these disorders may appear to resist dominant ideological constructs, they simultaneously reveal the damaging influence of cultural norms on the female body.

In 2003, the tenth-anniversary reissue of ''Unbearable Weight'' was nominated for a [[Pulitzer Prize]]. In this updated edition, Bordo further examined cultural representations of the female body through the lenses of patriarchy, contemporary feminism, and postindustrial capitalism.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The encyclopedia of literary and cultural theory|last=Waters|first=Melanie|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell Publishing|year=2011|isbn=9781405183123}}</ref>


===''Twilight Zones: The Hidden Life of Cultural Images from Plato to O.J.'' (1997)===
===''Twilight Zones: The Hidden Life of Cultural Images from Plato to O.J.'' (1997)===
''Twilight Zones'' represents Bordo's continued preoccupation and study of cultural images and their saturation within contemporary culture. She utilizes [[Plato]]'s [[parable of the cave]], where images are projected onto the back of the cave presenting the illusion of a [[reality]] its inhabitants identify with and accept as real, claiming that such a [[metaphor]] depicts a particular contemporary concern. She writes that "[f]or us, bedazzlement by created images is no metaphor; it is the actual condition of our lives."<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. .</ref> Bordo alludes to constructed images of bodily perfection in contemporary consumer culture such as the portrayal of reconstructed physical bodies in magazines and advertisements as presenting false ideals for the viewers who identify with such images and use them as standards for their own bodies and lives. She writes that "we need to rehabilitate the concept of "truth" for our time . . . focusing on helping the next generation learn to critically see through the illusions and mystifications of the image dominated culture they have grown up in."<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 22.</ref> ''Twilight Zones'' also takes up, in various essays, the connection and conversation between academic and non-academic institutions,<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 19.</ref> for while not anti-academic herself, Bordo sees academic and intellectual thought as proclaiming itself "'outside' the cave of cultural mystification," as raised up onto "a loftier perch, scrutinizing the proceedings below."<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 18.</ref> Bordo wants to "bring theory down to earth."<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 24.</ref>
''Twilight Zones'' continued Bordo's exploration of cultural images and their pervasive influence on contemporary society. Bordo argued that the [[allegory of the cave]] was analogous to contemporary issues. She wrote, "[f]or us, bedazzlement by created images is no metaphor; it is the actual condition of our lives."<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. .</ref> Bordo critiqued consumer culture's portrayal of idealized bodies, suggesting these reconstructed images present false ideals that viewers internalize as standards for their own bodies and lives. She advocated for a renewed concept of "truth," emphasizing the importance of teaching future generations to critically evaluate and "see through the illusions and mystifications" of an image-dominated culture.<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 22.</ref>

The book also examines the relationship between academic and non-academic institutions,<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 19.</ref> addressing the tendency of academic thought to position itself as being "outside the cave of cultural mystification," elevated above mainstream culture. While not anti-academic, Bordo critiqued this detachment, advocating instead for theory that engages directly with everyday life.<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 18.</ref> She described this goal as an effort to "bring theory down to earth."<ref>Bordo, ''Twilight Zones'', p. 24.</ref>


===''The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private'' (1999)===
===''The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private'' (1999)===
With ''The Male Body'' Bordo shifts her focus from looking specifically at female and feminized bodies to looking at the male body from a female perspective. She includes analyses of the male body that take into consideration the representation of the male body in [[popular culture|popular cultural]] modes of communication such as movies, advertisements and [[literature]], revealing how anxieties over bodily form and beauty are not limited to women but are of concern for men also. She also analyzes attitudes surrounding the [[penis]] and [[gay]] culture in the twentieth century.
In ''The Male Body'', Bordo broadened her focus from examining female and feminized bodies to exploring the male body from a female perspective. The book analyzed representations of the male body in mass media, highlighting that concerns about bodily form and beauty affect men. Bordo further examined societal attitudes toward the [[penis]] and [[Sexuality and gender identity-based cultures|queer culture]] in the twentieth century.


=== ''The Creation of Anne Boleyn'' (2014) ===
=== ''The Creation of Anne Boleyn'' (2014) ===
In ''The Creation of Anne Boleyn,'' Bordo seeks to break down the "sedimented mythology turned into 'history' by decades of repetition" and rewrite Boleyn's story as an ambitious woman seeking power without the cache of distorted imagery around her appearance.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/books/the-creation-of-anne-boleyn-by-susan-bordo.html|title=For One Royal History Has Added Insult to Injury|last=Schuessler|first=Jennifer|date=April 14, 2013|work=The New York Times|access-date=October 24, 2018}}</ref>
In ''The Creation of Anne Boleyn'', Bordo examined the myths and misconceptions that have shaped [[Anne Boleyn]]'s historical narrative. She aims to dismantle the "sedimented mythology turned into 'history' by decades of repetition" and presents Boleyn as an ambitious woman striving for power, free from the distorted imagery often associated with her appearance.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/books/the-creation-of-anne-boleyn-by-susan-bordo.html|title=For One Royal History Has Added Insult to Injury|last=Schuessler|first=Jennifer|date=April 14, 2013|work=The New York Times|access-date=October 24, 2018}}</ref>


===''The Destruction of Hillary Clinton'' (2017)===
===''The Destruction of Hillary Clinton'' (2017)===
Bordo examines why "… the most qualified candidate ever to run for president lost the seemingly unloseable election."<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bordo|first1=Susan|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/commentisfree/2017/apr/03/the-destruction-of-hillary-clinton-sexism-sanders-and-the-millennial-feminists/|title=The destruction of Hillary Clinton: sexism, Sanders and the millennial feminists|work=The Guardian|date=April 3, 2017|access-date=April 3, 2017}}</ref>
In ''The Destruction of Hillary Clinton'', Susan Bordo analyzed the factors contributing to [[Hillary Clinton]]'s defeat in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 U.S. presidential election]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Bordo|first1=Susan|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/commentisfree/2017/apr/03/the-destruction-of-hillary-clinton-sexism-sanders-and-the-millennial-feminists/|title=The destruction of Hillary Clinton: sexism, Sanders and the millennial feminists|work=The Guardian|date=April 3, 2017|access-date=April 3, 2017}}</ref>


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
Line 104: Line 120:
[[Category:American women philosophers]]
[[Category:American women philosophers]]
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
[[Category:People from Newark, New Jersey]]
[[Category:Writers from Newark, New Jersey]]
[[Category:Weequahic High School alumni]]
[[Category:Weequahic High School alumni]]
[[Category:20th-century American women]]
[[Category:20th-century American women academics]]
[[Category:20th-century American academics]]
[[Category:American feminist writers]]
[[Category:American feminist writers]]
[[Category:21st-century American Jews]]
[[Category:21st-century American Jews]]

Latest revision as of 06:19, 17 December 2024

Susan Bordo
Born
NationalityAmerican
Alma materState University of New York at Stony Brook (Ph.D., 1982)
Occupations
  • Author
  • philosopher
  • professor
EmployerUniversity of Kentucky
Known forFeminist philosophy

Susan Bordo is an American philosopher work in contemporary cultural studies, with a particular focus on feminist theory.[1] Her scholarship examines the intersection of culture and the body, addressing topics such as eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, plastic surgery, ideals of beauty, racism and the body, masculinity, and sexual harassment.

Overview

[edit]

Bordo's work contributes to feminist, cultural, and gender studies, focusing on the connections between consumer culture and the construction of gendered bodies. Her 1993 book Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body examined how popular culture shapes perceptions of the female body. It also discusses conditions like hysteria, agoraphobia, anorexia nervosa, and bulimia as "complex crystallizations of culture."[2]

Bordo's 1999 book The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and Private examined cultural and personal perspectives on the male body from a woman's perspective.[3]

Education and career

[edit]

Bordo was raised in Newark, New Jersey and graduated from Weequahic High School in 1964.[4] She received her Ph.D. from Stony Brook University in 1982. Bordo is the Otis A. Singletary Chair in the Humanities at the University of Kentucky, where she teaches English and women's studies.

Theoretical context

[edit]

Philosophical discourse

[edit]

Bordo's writing aims to engage audiences beyond the academic sphere while remaining firmly rooted in theoretical frameworks.[5] Her work draws on philosophical discourse to examine issues such as rationality, objectivity, and mind-body dualism, situating the body within historical and cultural contexts.[6] Bordo argues that throughout history, the body has been constructed as separate from the "true self"—variously conceived as soul, mind, spirit, will, creativity, or freedom—and as an entity that undermines the efforts of that self.[7] She traces the concept of the body to writers such as Plato, Augustine of Hippo, and the authors of the Bible, which have portrayed the body as animalistic, appetitive, deceptive, and a prison for the soul.[8]

Bordo has examined the dualistic nature of the mind-body relationship through the philosophies of Aristotle, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and René Descartes. She has analyzed how binaries such as spirit/matter and male activity/female passivity have historically reinforced gender roles and categorizations. According to Bordo, these dualisms have positioned men as aligned with intellect and the mind or spirit, while women have been associated with the body, often the subordinate and negatively connoted term in this dichotomy.

Materialism

[edit]

Bordo argues that "knowledge is 'embodied,' produced from a 'standpoint,' by a body that exists as a material entity among other material entities."[5] This view places her within a materialist framework, as Susan Hekman has noted, emphasizing Bordo's focus on the materiality of the body, often referred to as the "real" body.[9] Bordo's work is frequently compared and contrasted to that of Judith Butler.

Bordo has compared to the body as a text to be inscribed upon and interpreted but emphasizes its material and situated nature within Western culture. In contrast, Butler aligns more with postmodern theory, treating the body as "pure text."[9] Bordo has critiqued this approach, observing that treating the body as pure text highlights "subversive" and "destabilizing" elements while celebrating freedom and self-determination but may overlook the material aspects of the body.[10] Bordo has argued that cultural definitions of the body and its materiality must be resisted and insists that "real" bodies remain central to feminist analysis and resistance.[11]

Feminism

[edit]

Bordo's critique of gendered, particularly feminine, bodies incorporates methodologies from feminist and gender studies. She has re-examined and modified other feminist approaches, including those that focused on dichotomies like oppressor/oppressed and victimizer/victim. Bordo has noted that second-wave feminism often regarded "the female body [as] a socially shaped and historically 'colonized' territory,"[12] a perspective that, she argues, framed women and their bodies primarily as passive victims within a patriarchal society. Bordo has highlighted newer feminist critiques that focus on "racial, economic and class differences among women" and examine both women's participation in patriarchal culture and their efforts to resist it.[13]

Cultural studies

[edit]

Situated within feminist and gender studies frameworks, Bordo's theories also draw from cultural studies, analyzing the influence of mass media as tools of domination and resistance. While some cultural theorists, such as John Fiske in Television Culture (1990), view media as shaping perception through representational codes while also offering opportunities for resistance through audience reinterpretation,[14] Bordo has taken a more critical stance. She has argued that cultural codes function as pervasive and constraining forces. According to Bordo, "the rules of femininity have come to be culturally transmitted more and more through the deployment of standardized visual images,"[15] with mass media insidiously imposing ideals of bodily beauty that are perceived by those affected as freely chosen options.[14]

Post-structuralism

[edit]

Bordo's work on culture, power, and gender formation is influenced in part by post-structuralist. Susan Hekman notes that Bordo, like many contemporary feminist theorists,[9] advocates for a selective application of postmodern theories. Bordo’s works use Michel Foucault's frameworks to critique and analyze "the normative feminine practices of our culture."[16]

Bordo has written in favor of Foucault's conceptualization of power as a network of decentralized forces for understanding the formation and regulation of gender.[17] In this framework, power operates from below, meaning that societal norms, including gender, are maintained less through coercion and more through self-surveillance and self-regulation.[16] Bordo, like Foucault, has focused on the societal discourses that produce, define, and interpret the female body.[18]

Writing

[edit]

The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture (1987)

[edit]

Bordo has described The Flight to Objectivity as a "fresh approach" to René Descartes' 1641 work Meditations on First Philosophy. In The Flight to Objectivity, Bordo critiqued the stable notions of objectivity and knowledge central to Cartesian thought, which she argued have become increasingly questioned in contemporary society. She highlighted the "limitations of science and the interested, even ideological nature of all human pursuits," asserting that such critiques are now unavoidable.[19] Bordo proposed that Descartes’ arguments should be understood not as abstract or ahistorical but within the cultural context that shaped them.[20]

Susan Hekman observes that while The Flight to Objectivity does not directly theorize the body, it identifies Descartes' work as foundational to cultural conceptions of the body, particularly the female body.[21] Bordo examined the Cartesian dualism of mind and body, where the body is depicted as a "prison that the mind must escape to achieve knowledge."[22] This framework informed Bordo's broader analyses of how cultural forces shape perceptions of the body, with particular attention to the female body.

Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body (1993)

[edit]

Bordo's Unbearable Weight is a collection of essays that examines the body's construction and positioning within Western society, offering what Bordo describes as "a cultural approach to the body."[2] The book analyzes "obsessive body practices of contemporary culture," such as plastic surgery, extreme dieting, and rigorous physical training, framing them not as anomalies but as "logical (if extreme) manifestations of anxieties and fantasies fostered by our culture." Bordo argued that these practices illustrate how cultural representations homogenize ideals and how these homogenized images become normalized.[23][24]

Unbearable Weight also explores the relationship between culture and disorders like anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Bordo contended that such disorders cannot be fully understood through medical or psychological perspectives alone but must be viewed as "complex crystallizations of culture."[2] She argued that while these disorders may appear to resist dominant ideological constructs, they simultaneously reveal the damaging influence of cultural norms on the female body.

In 2003, the tenth-anniversary reissue of Unbearable Weight was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. In this updated edition, Bordo further examined cultural representations of the female body through the lenses of patriarchy, contemporary feminism, and postindustrial capitalism.[25]

Twilight Zones: The Hidden Life of Cultural Images from Plato to O.J. (1997)

[edit]

Twilight Zones continued Bordo's exploration of cultural images and their pervasive influence on contemporary society. Bordo argued that the allegory of the cave was analogous to contemporary issues. She wrote, "[f]or us, bedazzlement by created images is no metaphor; it is the actual condition of our lives."[26] Bordo critiqued consumer culture's portrayal of idealized bodies, suggesting these reconstructed images present false ideals that viewers internalize as standards for their own bodies and lives. She advocated for a renewed concept of "truth," emphasizing the importance of teaching future generations to critically evaluate and "see through the illusions and mystifications" of an image-dominated culture.[27]

The book also examines the relationship between academic and non-academic institutions,[28] addressing the tendency of academic thought to position itself as being "outside the cave of cultural mystification," elevated above mainstream culture. While not anti-academic, Bordo critiqued this detachment, advocating instead for theory that engages directly with everyday life.[29] She described this goal as an effort to "bring theory down to earth."[30]

The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private (1999)

[edit]

In The Male Body, Bordo broadened her focus from examining female and feminized bodies to exploring the male body from a female perspective. The book analyzed representations of the male body in mass media, highlighting that concerns about bodily form and beauty affect men. Bordo further examined societal attitudes toward the penis and queer culture in the twentieth century.

The Creation of Anne Boleyn (2014)

[edit]

In The Creation of Anne Boleyn, Bordo examined the myths and misconceptions that have shaped Anne Boleyn's historical narrative. She aims to dismantle the "sedimented mythology turned into 'history' by decades of repetition" and presents Boleyn as an ambitious woman striving for power, free from the distorted imagery often associated with her appearance.[31]

The Destruction of Hillary Clinton (2017)

[edit]

In The Destruction of Hillary Clinton, Susan Bordo analyzed the factors contributing to Hillary Clinton's defeat in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[32]

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Bordo, Susan. "The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity: A Feminist Appropriation of Foucault." Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. Eds. Alison M. Jaggar and Susan R. Bordo. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1989. 13-33.
  • Bordo, Susan. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State U of New York P, 1987.
  • Bordo, Susan. The Male Body: A Look at Men in Public and in Private. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999.
  • Bordo, Susan. Twilight Zones: The Hidden Life of Cultural Images from Plato to O.J. Berkeley: U of California P, 1997.
  • Bordo, Susan. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: U of California P, 1993.
  • Bordo, Susan, ed. Feminist Interpretations of René Descartes. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State UP, 1999.
  • Hekman, Susan. Review of Unbearable Weight, by Susan Bordo, and Bodies That Matter, by Judith Butler. Hypatia 10.4 (Fall 1995).
  • Hekman, Susan. "Material Bodies." Body and Flesh: A Philosophical Reader. Ed. Donn Welton. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1998. 61-70.
  • Jarvis, Christina. "Gendered Appetites: Feminisms, Dorothy Allison, and the Body." Women's Studies 29.6 (Dec. 2000). 763-92.
  • Rooney, Ellen. "What Can the Matter Be?" American Literary History 8.4 (Winter 1996). 745-58.
  • "Susan Bordo." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Vincent B. Leitch, gen. ed. New York: Norton and Co., 2001. 2360-62
  • Bordo, Susan The Creation of Anne Boleyn, A New Look at England's Most Notorious Queen. HMH 2013
  • Bordo, Susan. The Destruction of Hillary Clinton. Melville House (April 4, 2017). ISBN 978-1612196633

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Schuessler, Jennifer (2013-04-14). "For One Royal, History Has Added Insult to Injury". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-06-29.
  2. ^ a b c Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 35.
  3. ^ "bordo". gws.as.uky.edu. Retrieved 2023-03-28.
  4. ^ Distinguished Weequahic Alumni, Weequahic High School Alumni Association. Accessed December 19, 2019. "Susan Klein Bordo (1964) a Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky."
  5. ^ a b Leitch, p. 2360.
  6. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 4.
  7. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 5.
  8. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 3.
  9. ^ a b c Hekman, Review
  10. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 38.
  11. ^ Hekman, "Material Bodies", p. 65.
  12. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 21.
  13. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 23.
  14. ^ a b Leitch, p. 1026.
  15. ^ Bordo, "The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity", p. 17.
  16. ^ a b Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 27.
  17. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 26.
  18. ^ Leitch, p. 2361.
  19. ^ Bordo, The Flight to Objectivity, p. 2.
  20. ^ Bordo, The Flight to Objectivity, p. 3.
  21. ^ Bordo, The Flight to Objectivity, p. 62.
  22. ^ Hekman, "Material Bodies", p. 62.
  23. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 15.
  24. ^ Bordo, Unbearable Weight, p. 24-25.
  25. ^ Waters, Melanie (2011). The encyclopedia of literary and cultural theory. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 9781405183123.
  26. ^ Bordo, Twilight Zones, p. .
  27. ^ Bordo, Twilight Zones, p. 22.
  28. ^ Bordo, Twilight Zones, p. 19.
  29. ^ Bordo, Twilight Zones, p. 18.
  30. ^ Bordo, Twilight Zones, p. 24.
  31. ^ Schuessler, Jennifer (April 14, 2013). "For One Royal History Has Added Insult to Injury". The New York Times. Retrieved October 24, 2018.
  32. ^ Bordo, Susan (April 3, 2017). "The destruction of Hillary Clinton: sexism, Sanders and the millennial feminists". The Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2017.
[edit]