Talk:Doug Mastriano: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 4 discussions to Talk:Doug Mastriano/Archives/2022/November. (BOT) |
→drone freak out: new section |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap}} |
||
{{controversial}} |
|||
{{COI editnotice}} |
{{COI editnotice}} |
||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|blp=activepol|listas=Mastriano, Douglas|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Military history |
{{WikiProject Military history|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Historiography=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Pritzker-GLAM |
{{WikiProject Pritzker-GLAM|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Biography| |
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject United States |importance=Low |USSL=yes |USSL-importance=low}} |
|||
| blp=yes |
|||
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Doug Mastriano/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=2160|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Doug Mastriano/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=2160|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
== Removal of the hyperlinked “far-right” == |
|||
== drone freak out == |
|||
You are only hyperlinking the term to gaslight and disparage the subject. I recommend keeping the moniker “far-right” but removing the hyperlink. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1016:B00D:6EFE:183A:E80:83C4:B096|2600:1016:B00D:6EFE:183A:E80:83C4:B096]] ([[User talk:2600:1016:B00D:6EFE:183A:E80:83C4:B096|talk]]) 02:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:We include references to show we're not just making it up, but that reliable sources say it. We're not [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:Soibangla|soibangla]] ([[User talk:Soibangla|talk]]) 09:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::No, we're far-left-pedia, clearly. All the wording in this article is designed to make Mastriano look bad. It's so obvious. [[User:JackGunn|JackGunn]] ([[User talk:JackGunn|talk]]) 23:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::The whole point of this site is to not have a bias; if it feels too "far left" for you, edit it with more objective wording. Don't be one of those people who looks at an article about someone who stabbed someone else and complains that there are references to newspaper articles talking about the stabbing as "demonizing" the subject. Naw, man, they reported on a stabbing. If you don't want articles about your stabs online, stop stabbing people. It is absolutely frightening how many people don't get that. Not everything is a persecution. [[Special:Contributions/71.47.252.144|71.47.252.144]] ([[User talk:71.47.252.144|talk]]) 04:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::The problem is that editors have a left-wing bias, and they are the ones who decide what "reliable sources" are. I have looked over the list on many occasions, and noticed a pattern where if a source has even a slight editorial bias to the right, they cannot be used as a source. But equidistant to the left side sources will be fully green, or at most yellow with a caveat that opinions should be noted. And even without that internal bias, there is the institutional bias that exists in the broader media from which Wikipedia draws its information. NPR is considered a solid-green reliable source even though it routinely skews its reporting by selectively leaving out facts that interfere with or contradict the subtext of the story. So who decides that NPR is a reliable source? People who already believe NPR's subtext and are equally uninterested in or concerned with inconvenient facts being left out. Stories that gratify one's biases rarely get a skepticism check. |
|||
::::You can pretend that this problem doesn't exist with Wikipedia. But clearly your own biases cause blind spots in your own editing. Heck, I can see it here. Mastriano classified as "far right." And conveniently linked is a page about the term "far right" that doesn't even match his views. The section on "far right" in the United States describes it as "militant forms of insurgent revolutionary right ideology and separatist ethnocentric nationalism." I'm sorry, but only an incredibly biased editor could go from "Mastriano doesn't believe in gay marriage" to saying that he is a member of the [[Joy of Satan Ministries]] or [[Christian Identity]], neither of which bears any relation to the Christianity he believes in. [[Special:Contributions/66.49.112.52|66.49.112.52]] ([[User talk:66.49.112.52|talk]]) 13:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::And you can pretend that "Christian nationalism" is Christianity. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 03:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Doug posted photos of the moon, and set photos from star wars on his twitter page, and claimed that they were photos of the federal goverment running an illegal drone program. i think this should be linked to becuase it just shows what an out of touch moron he is. |
|||
There is no reason to hyperlink the term “far-right” other than to link to a page that has scarier things posted there (Hitler, oh my!). We need to remove it. [[User:Richinstead|Richinstead]] ([[User talk:Richinstead|talk]]) 03:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
https://x.com/SenMastriano/status/1868794734530953444 [[User:Loudstrawberry|Loudstrawberry]] ([[User talk:Loudstrawberry|talk]]) 14:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Just because an outlet reported on a stabbing that does negate the fact that news outlets all have agendas. That said this debate ended several months ago and the text wasn’t removed. I agree that if you want to make something unbiased you should contribute, but shooting down someone who is utilizing a *talk* page as intended as complaining. People are encouraged to take it to the talk page for disagreements just like this one. [[User:Sciophobiaranger|Sciophobiaranger]] ([[User talk:Sciophobiaranger|talk]]) 02:53, 9 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Far Right is not a correct description. == |
|||
I do not think using far right is a proper description. That sounds like an editorial not a fact. [[Special:Contributions/134.228.133.240|134.228.133.240]] ([[User talk:134.228.133.240|talk]]) 12:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:If he's an election denier, then he qualifies. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 15:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::According to whom, you? Remember that Hillary Clinton is an election denier as well. Is she far right?? [[User:Javabarbarian|Javabarbarian]] ([[User talk:Javabarbarian|talk]]) 21:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::Did she send a violent mob to storm the capitol? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 05:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::Did Mastriano? [[Special:Contributions/66.49.112.52|66.49.112.52]] ([[User talk:66.49.112.52|talk]]) 14:14, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Not according to the actual [[Far-right politics]] wiki page. It describes far-right in the United States context thus: |
|||
::"In [[Politics of the United States|United States politics]], the terms "extreme right", "far-right", and "ultra-right" are labels used to describe "militant forms of insurgent revolutionary right ideology and separatist ethnocentric nationalism", such as [[Christian Identity]], the [[Creativity (religion)|Creativity Movement]], the [[Ku Klux Klan]], the [[National Socialist Movement (United States)|National Socialist Movement]], the [[National Alliance (United States)|National Alliance]], the [[Joy of Satan Ministries]], and the [[Order of Nine Angles]]. These far-right groups share [[Conspiracy theories|conspiracist views]] of power which are overwhelmingly [[Anti-Semitism|anti-Semitic]] and reject [[pluralist democracy]] in favour of an [[Organicism#In politics and sociology|organic]] [[oligarchy]] that would unite the perceived homogeneously racial ''[[Völkisch movement|Völkish]]'' nation. The far-right in the United States is composed of various [[Neo-fascism|neo-fascist]], [[Neo-Nazism|neo-Nazi]], [[White nationalism|white nationalist]], and [[White supremacism|white supremacist]] organizations and networks who have been known to refer to an "[[Accelerationism#Far-right accelerationist terrorism|acceleration]]" of racial conflict through violent means such as [[Assassination|assassinations]], [[Murder|murders]], [[Right-wing terrorism|terrorist attacks]], and [[societal collapse]], in order to achieve the building of a [[white ethnostate]]." |
|||
::Not a word in there about denying elections. You can't just throw a new characteristic, especially one that isn't even a defining characteristic., because it suits your dishonesty and bias. [[Special:Contributions/66.49.112.52|66.49.112.52]] ([[User talk:66.49.112.52|talk]]) 14:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
I don’t see Nancy PELOSI labeled as ‘far left’ … in fact I see no other politicians listed as ‘far left’ …. I used to like ‘wickipedia’ but I think it has been bought out like the the rest of the media… 32 billion buys a lot. [[User:PjkPA|PjkPA]] ([[User talk:PjkPA|talk]]) 14:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Probably because she isn't "far-left" by any yardstick. '''[[User:Ser!|ser!]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ser!|chat to me]] - [[Special:Contributions/Ser!|see my edits]])</sup> 15:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Prosentage point loss in lead == |
|||
For example there is none of this in the wikipedia for mehmed oz or for democratic politicians like charlie crist [[Special:Contributions/109.240.91.198|109.240.91.198]] ([[User talk:109.240.91.198|talk]]) 15:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:[[WP:OTHERCONTENT]]. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 15:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{small|I doubt that ''any'' article here uses the word "prosentage". ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 21:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
Latest revision as of 14:41, 17 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doug Mastriano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
drone freak out
[edit]Doug posted photos of the moon, and set photos from star wars on his twitter page, and claimed that they were photos of the federal goverment running an illegal drone program. i think this should be linked to becuase it just shows what an out of touch moron he is. https://x.com/SenMastriano/status/1868794734530953444 Loudstrawberry (talk) 14:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military historiography articles
- Military historiography task force articles
- C-Class Pritzker Military Library-related articles
- Low-importance Pritzker Military Library-related articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class US State Legislatures articles
- Low-importance US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles