Accommodationism: Difference between revisions
Thebiguglyalien moved page Accommodationism to Accommodationism in the United States: Article is entirely about the United States. To be replaced with article covering subject more broadly Tag: New redirect |
→top: fixed spelling error |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Philosophical and legal view accepting both religious and rationalist/irreligious views}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
In law and philosophy, '''accommodationism''' is the cooperation between government and religious institutions.<ref name="Bobic2023">{{cite web |last1=Bobic |first1=Michael P. |title=Accommodationism and Religion |url=https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/accommodationism-and-religion |publisher=[[Middle Tennessee State University]] |access-date=18 December 2024 |language=English |date=12 August 2023}}</ref> Underlying accommodationism is the idea that"government and religion are compatible and necessary to a well-ordered society."<ref name="Bobic2023"/> Accommodationist policies are common in [[Liberal democracy|liberal democracies]] as a method of guaranteeing [[freedom of religion]], and these policies may include options for [[religious education]], official recognition of certain religious practices, and tolerance of religious expression in public spaces. It contrasts with [[secularism|separationist secularism]] and [[fundamentalism]]. |
|||
== By location == |
|||
{{Redirect category shell| |
|||
{{R from move}} |
|||
=== Europe === |
|||
[[Germany]] provides financial support for religious organizations. Teaching of religion is permitted in schools, but students have the right to choose the type of religious instruction, if any.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Eberle |first=Edward J. |date=2006 |title=Religion in the Classroom in Germany and the United States |journal=Tul. L. Rev.}}</ref> In [[Albania]], accommodationism is associated with long standing [[Islam|Islamic]] traditions in the country and [[Sufism]] in particular, while it's opposed by neo-fundamentalist groups and the [[Salafi movement]] in particular.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Endresen |first=Cecilie |title=The Revival of Islam in the Balkans: From Identity to Religiosity |year=2015 |isbn=9781137517838 |editor-last=Roy |editor-first=Olivier |pages=223 |language=en |chapter=Faith, Fatherland or Both? Accommodationist and Neo-Fundamentalist Islamic Discourses in Albania |editor-last2=Elbasani |editor-first2=Arolda}}</ref> |
|||
In the [[United Kingdom]], accommodationism is relevant to the role of the [[Church of England]] and the debate over [[disestablishmentarianism]]. |
|||
=== India === |
|||
India adopted accommodationism in its [[Constitution of India|Constitution]] in 1947, supported by secularists such as [[Mahatma Gandhi]], [[Jawaharlal Nehru]], and [[B. R. Ambedkar]]. The government administrates religious instruction in private schools, funds religious organizations the same was as other NGOs, and does not regulate religious activity unless it contradicts the constitution. Muslims are not strictly bound by the law of India and are permitted to operate separately under a [[Sharia]] system for civil issues.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Berlinerblau |first=Jacques |title=Secularism: The Basics |publisher=Routledge |year=2021 |isbn=9780367691585 |pages=76–87 |chapter=Indian Secularism: The Accommodationist Framework}}</ref> |
|||
=== United States === |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Accommodationist jurisprudence in the United States began with ''[[Zorach v. Clauson]]'' (1952).<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Kauper| first = Paul| title = The Warren Court: Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations |journal = Michigan Law Review| date = 1968 |volume = 67| issue = 2| pages = 271 |url=https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol67/iss2/6}}</ref> In the United States, it often pertains to religion in schools; public schools in the United States cannot sponsor or endorse religion, but [[Parochial school|parochial schools]] are [[Pierce v. Society of Sisters|permitted to exist]] and their [[Everson v. Board of Education|students may receive government aid]] if the benefit to religious activities is indirect or incidental.<ref name="WilcoxJelen2016">{{cite book |last1=Wilcox |first1=Clyde |title=Public Attitudes Toward Church and State |last2=Jelen |first2=Ted G. |date=16 September 2016 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=9781315485478 |pages=20, 100 |language=English}}</ref> Religious practices have been recognized and adopted by law, including [[Christmas]] as a federal holiday since 1870 (at first applicable only to federal employees in the [[District of Columbia]], extended in 1885 to all federal employees) and [[In God We Trust]] as the national motto since 1956.<ref name="Drakeman1991">{{cite book |last=Drakeman |first=Donald L. |title=Church-state Constitutional Issues: Making Sense of the Establishment Clause |date=1 January 1991 |publisher=Greenwood Press |isbn=9780313276637 |language=English}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41990.pdf|title=Federal Holidays: Evolution and Current Practices|publisher=Congressional Research Service|website=www.fas.org|date=2014-05-09|access-date=2015-06-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924133453/http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41990.pdf|archive-date=September 24, 2015|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref><ref name="RSAL22">{{cite book|last1=Bittker|first1=Boris|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pduCCgAAQBAJ&q=%22e+pluribus+unum%22+1776+motto&pg=PA136|title=Religion and the State in American Law|last2=Idleman|first2=Scott|last3=Ravitch|first3=Frank|date=2015|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|isbn=9781107071827|page=136|via=[[Google Books]]|access-date=2020-11-12|archive-date=2021-04-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210422092643/https://books.google.com/books?id=pduCCgAAQBAJ&q=%22e+pluribus+unum%22+1776+motto&pg=PA136|url-status=live}}</ref> The [[Supreme Court of the United States]] has ruled in favor of an accommodationist interpretation of the religion clauses of the First Amendment multiple times, both implicitly and explicitly.<ref name="WaldCalhoun-Brown2010">{{cite book |last1=Wald |first1=Kenneth D. |title=Religion and Politics in the United States |last2=Calhoun-Brown |first2=Allison |date=16 August 2010 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |isbn=9781442201538 |pages=80–85 |language=English}}</ref> |
|||
== See also == |
|||
{{Portal|Law|Politics|Conservatism |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
* [[Faith and rationality]] |
|||
* [[Religion in politics]] |
|||
* [[Religious pluralism]] |
|||
* [[Separation of church and state]] |
|||
* [[Syncretism]] |
|||
== References == |
|||
<references /> |
|||
[[Category:Religion and politics]] |
|||
[[Category:Separation of church and state]] |
|||
[[Category:Philosophy of religion]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 18 December 2024
In law and philosophy, accommodationism is the cooperation between government and religious institutions.[1] Underlying accommodationism is the idea that"government and religion are compatible and necessary to a well-ordered society."[1] Accommodationist policies are common in liberal democracies as a method of guaranteeing freedom of religion, and these policies may include options for religious education, official recognition of certain religious practices, and tolerance of religious expression in public spaces. It contrasts with separationist secularism and fundamentalism.
By location
[edit]Europe
[edit]Germany provides financial support for religious organizations. Teaching of religion is permitted in schools, but students have the right to choose the type of religious instruction, if any.[2] In Albania, accommodationism is associated with long standing Islamic traditions in the country and Sufism in particular, while it's opposed by neo-fundamentalist groups and the Salafi movement in particular.[3]
In the United Kingdom, accommodationism is relevant to the role of the Church of England and the debate over disestablishmentarianism.
India
[edit]India adopted accommodationism in its Constitution in 1947, supported by secularists such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and B. R. Ambedkar. The government administrates religious instruction in private schools, funds religious organizations the same was as other NGOs, and does not regulate religious activity unless it contradicts the constitution. Muslims are not strictly bound by the law of India and are permitted to operate separately under a Sharia system for civil issues.[4]
United States
[edit]Accommodationist jurisprudence in the United States began with Zorach v. Clauson (1952).[5] In the United States, it often pertains to religion in schools; public schools in the United States cannot sponsor or endorse religion, but parochial schools are permitted to exist and their students may receive government aid if the benefit to religious activities is indirect or incidental.[6] Religious practices have been recognized and adopted by law, including Christmas as a federal holiday since 1870 (at first applicable only to federal employees in the District of Columbia, extended in 1885 to all federal employees) and In God We Trust as the national motto since 1956.[7][8][9] The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in favor of an accommodationist interpretation of the religion clauses of the First Amendment multiple times, both implicitly and explicitly.[10]
See also
[edit]
- Faith and rationality
- Religion in politics
- Religious pluralism
- Separation of church and state
- Syncretism
References
[edit]- ^ a b Bobic, Michael P. (12 August 2023). "Accommodationism and Religion". Middle Tennessee State University. Retrieved 18 December 2024.
- ^ Eberle, Edward J. (2006). "Religion in the Classroom in Germany and the United States". Tul. L. Rev.
- ^ Endresen, Cecilie (2015). "Faith, Fatherland or Both? Accommodationist and Neo-Fundamentalist Islamic Discourses in Albania". In Roy, Olivier; Elbasani, Arolda (eds.). The Revival of Islam in the Balkans: From Identity to Religiosity. p. 223. ISBN 9781137517838.
- ^ Berlinerblau, Jacques (2021). "Indian Secularism: The Accommodationist Framework". Secularism: The Basics. Routledge. pp. 76–87. ISBN 9780367691585.
- ^ Kauper, Paul (1968). "The Warren Court: Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations". Michigan Law Review. 67 (2): 271.
- ^ Wilcox, Clyde; Jelen, Ted G. (16 September 2016). Public Attitudes Toward Church and State. Taylor & Francis. pp. 20, 100. ISBN 9781315485478.
- ^ Drakeman, Donald L. (1 January 1991). Church-state Constitutional Issues: Making Sense of the Establishment Clause. Greenwood Press. ISBN 9780313276637.
- ^ "Federal Holidays: Evolution and Current Practices" (PDF). www.fas.org. Congressional Research Service. May 9, 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved June 15, 2015.
- ^ Bittker, Boris; Idleman, Scott; Ravitch, Frank (2015). Religion and the State in American Law. Cambridge University Press. p. 136. ISBN 9781107071827. Archived from the original on 2021-04-22. Retrieved 2020-11-12 – via Google Books.
- ^ Wald, Kenneth D.; Calhoun-Brown, Allison (16 August 2010). Religion and Politics in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 80–85. ISBN 9781442201538.