Jump to content

User talk:PersonAccount: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Vandalism: ReplyThat's bullshit. We don't have insubordination, and an admins knows better than to edit not logged in.
m Reverted edit by MSUisakkkschool (talk) to last version by PersonAccount
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}

== Welcome! ==
== Welcome! ==


Line 21: Line 23:
:Thanks for the helpful guide, I appreciate it [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 20:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for the helpful guide, I appreciate it [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 20:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)


== Introduction to contentious topics ==
Josh Heupel is a college head coach not and NFL, I was trying to change the template to college head coach instead of NFL [[Special:Contributions/2600:1005:B195:A0BD:49E:F899:CFB4:8FF7|2600:1005:B195:A0BD:49E:F899:CFB4:8FF7]] ([[User talk:2600:1005:B195:A0BD:49E:F899:CFB4:8FF7|talk]]) 21:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles''', a topic designated as '''''[[WP:AC/CT|contentious]]'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the [[WP:ARB|Arbitration Committee]]. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia [[WP:ADMIN|administrators]] have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
*adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Purpose|purposes of Wikipedia]];
*comply with all applicable [[WP:PG|policies and guidelines]];
*follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
*refrain from [[WP:GAMING|gaming the system]].


<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks' noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->
:Yes, sorry. I thought your edits were vandalism. My bad. [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 03:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)


Hi {{u|PersonAccount}},
== Vandalism ==


regarding the article about [[Sandeep Lamichhane]], please keep [[WP:BLPRESTORE]] in mind ({{tqq|If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first.}}).
Hello! I would suggest not trying to spot and revert alleged ‘vandalism’ when your account is so new as you risk disruptive editing (through misidentification). Your goal should be to build wikipedia, not (intentionally or not) jump into [[WP:WAR|edit wars]]. As you are new, [[WP:DNB|treat others how you wish to be treated yourself]]! Always [[WP:AFG|assume good faith]] lest you be blocked for being here merely to [[WP:NOTHERE|play around with others’ contributions]], like what you were doing with a few I.P. addresses the past few days. We do NOT want to scare new editors! Be kind.


If a consensus for the inclusion of the content is found at [[Talk:Sandeep Lamichhane]], the content can be restored.
P.S. I am an administrator currently logged out on a public system. I will not hesitate to [[Wikipedia:Blocked|block]] you from editing- in fact be forewarned that I will do so if you make one more incorrect accusation of vandalism/assume bad faith again!


The best of luck- [[Special:Contributions/111.65.33.7|111.65.33.7]] ([[User talk:111.65.33.7|talk]]) 05:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Best regards,<br>[[User:ToBeFree|&#126; ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 22:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)


:This message seems unbecoming of a sysop (if you even are one, which I highly doubt). [[User:FifthFive|FifthFive]] ([[User talk:FifthFive|talk]]) 05:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
:Okay, I understand. [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount 🐉]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::Well, don’t make me scrutinise your edits. I could [[Wikipedia:Blocked|block]] you too for insubordination! Do not cause yourself trouble. Be warned.
::Best [[Special:Contributions/111.65.33.7|111.65.33.7]] ([[User talk:111.65.33.7|talk]]) 05:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Understood, I will be more careful when reverting vandalism and focus more on improving articles [[User:PersonAccount|PersonAccount 🐉]] ([[User talk:PersonAccount#top|talk]]) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
::::That's bullshit. We don't have insubordination, and an admin knows better than to edit not logged in. [[User:Deepfriedokra|&#45;- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 15:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:47, 18 December 2024

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi PersonAccount! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the helpful guide, I appreciate it PersonAccount (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi PersonAccount,

regarding the article about Sandeep Lamichhane, please keep WP:BLPRESTORE in mind (If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first.).

If a consensus for the inclusion of the content is found at Talk:Sandeep Lamichhane, the content can be restored.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 15:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]