Muskrat Falls Generating Station: Difference between revisions
→Cost overruns and public inquiry: add ref |
Patar knight (talk | contribs) →Cost overruns and public inquiry: add Sept. 2024 fed bailout for NS w source |
||
(73 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|Hydroelectric generation station in Labrador, Canada}} |
||
{{Infobox dam |
{{Infobox dam |
||
| name = Muskrat Falls Generation |
| name = Muskrat Falls Generation Station |
||
| image = |
| image = |
||
| image_caption = |
| image_caption = |
||
| name_official = |
| name_official = |
||
| dam_crosses = [[Churchill River (Atlantic)|Churchill River]] |
| dam_crosses = [[Churchill River (Atlantic)|Churchill River]] |
||
| location = [[ |
| location = [[Labrador]], [[Newfoundland and Labrador]], Canada |
||
| dam_type = [[Roller compacted concrete]] |
| dam_type = [[Roller compacted concrete]] |
||
| dam_length = |
| dam_length = |
||
| dam_elevation_crest = 39.5 m<ref name="PUB">{{cite web|url=http://www.pub.nf.ca/applications/MuskratFalls2011/files/submission/Nalcor-Submission-Nov10-11.pdf |title=Nalcor's submission to the Board of Commissioners |date=November 10, 2011 |publisher=Nalcor Energy | |
| dam_elevation_crest = 39.5 m<ref name="PUB">{{cite web|url=http://www.pub.nf.ca/applications/MuskratFalls2011/files/submission/Nalcor-Submission-Nov10-11.pdf |title=Nalcor's submission to the Board of Commissioners |date=November 10, 2011 |publisher=Nalcor Energy |access-date=December 27, 2011 }}</ref> |
||
| dam_height = |
| dam_height = |
||
| dam_width_base = |
| dam_width_base = |
||
| dam_width_crest = |
| dam_width_crest = |
||
| spillway_count = 2 |
| spillway_count = 2 |
||
| spillway_type = 1 overflow spillway and 1 spillway with submerged [[Tainter gate|radial gates]] |
| spillway_type = 1 overflow spillway and 1 spillway with submerged [[Tainter gate|radial gates]]<ref name=MHI5>{{Cite report|last=Rae|first=P.|date=January 2012|title=Report on Two Generation Expansion Alternatives for the Island Interconnected Electrical System|url=http://www.pub.nf.ca/applications/muskratfalls2011/files/mhi/MHI-Report-VolumeII-Muskrat.pdf|publisher=[[Manitoba Hydro]] International|location=Winnipeg|volume=II|section=5|access-date=2014-07-26}}</ref>{{rp|87–88}} |
||
| spillway_capacity = 5930 m<sup>3</sup>/s <ref name="PUB" />{{rp|21}} |
| spillway_capacity = 5930 m<sup>3</sup>/s <ref name="PUB" />{{rp|21}} |
||
| construction_began = 2013 <ref name="Schedule">{{cite web |url=http://muskratfalls.nalcorenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Muskrat-Falls-Construction-Activities-June2014.jpg |title=Construction schedule to first power |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.-->|publisher=[[Nalcor Energy]]|format=JPG| |
| construction_began = 2013 <ref name="Schedule">{{cite web |url=http://muskratfalls.nalcorenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Muskrat-Falls-Construction-Activities-June2014.jpg |title=Construction schedule to first power |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.-->|publisher=[[Nalcor Energy]]|format=JPG|access-date=2014-07-26}}</ref> |
||
| opening = September 23, 2020 |
| opening = September 23, 2020 |
||
| cost = $12.7 billion |
| cost = $12.7 billion |
||
| owner = [[ |
| owner = [[Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro]] |
||
| res_name = |
| res_name = |
||
| res_capacity_total = |
| res_capacity_total = |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| plant_operator = |
| plant_operator = |
||
| plant_turbines = 4 x 206 MW [[Kaplan turbine]]s <ref name="PUB" />{{rp|23}} |
| plant_turbines = 4 x 206 MW [[Kaplan turbine]]s <ref name="PUB" />{{rp|23}} |
||
| plant_capacity = 824 [[Megawatt|MW]] |
| plant_capacity = 824 [[Megawatt|MW]]<ref name="MHI5" />{{rp|86}} |
||
| plant_annual_gen = 4.5 [[TWh]] |
| plant_annual_gen = 4.5 [[TWh]]<ref name="MHI5" />{{rp|86}} |
||
| plant_capacity_factor= 62.3% |
|||
| plant_commission = |
| plant_commission = |
||
| plant_decommission = |
| plant_decommission = |
||
Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
| extra = |
| extra = |
||
}} |
}} |
||
The ''' |
The '''Muskrat Falls Generating Station''' is a hydroelectric generating station in the [[Labrador]] region of [[Newfoundland and Labrador]], [[Canada]]. It comprises part of the remaining 35 per cent of the [[Churchill River (Atlantic)|Churchill River]] that was not developed by the [[Churchill Falls Generating Station]]. The station at [[Muskrat Falls]] has a capacity of over 824 MW and provides 4.5 TWh of electricity per year.<ref name="Lower Churchill Project">{{cite web |url=http://www.nalcorenergy.com/Lower-Churchill-Project.asp |title=Lower Churchill Project |publisher=Nalcor Energy |access-date=June 8, 2013 |archive-date=November 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161129063257/http://www.nalcorenergy.com/Lower-Churchill-Project.asp |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
A $6.2 billion deal between |
A $6.2 billion deal between Newfoundland and Labrador's [[Nalcor Energy]] and Halifax, Nova Scotia-based [[Emera]] to develop the project was announced in November 2010.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/churchill-hydro-deal-signals-era-of-atlantic-co-operation/article1314604/| location=Toronto | newspaper=The Globe and Mail | first=Shawn | last=McCarthy | title=Churchill hydro deal signals era of Atlantic co-operation – The Globe and Mail | date=18 November 2010}}</ref> On November 30, 2012, a federal loan guarantee deal for financing of the project was signed by [[Prime Minister of Canada|Prime Minister]] [[Stephen Harper]], [[Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador|Newfoundland and Labrador Premier]] [[Kathy Dunderdale]] and [[Premier of Nova Scotia|Nova Scotia Premier]] [[Darrell Dexter]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://globalnews.ca/news/314466/harper-signs-loan-guarantee-deal-for-muskrat-falls-despite-quebecs-outcry-5/|title=Harper signs loan guarantee deal for Muskrat Falls despite Quebec's outcry|publisher=Global News|date=November 30, 2012|first=Sue|last=Bailey|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/terms-of-muskrat-falls-federal-loan-guarantee-released-1.1203708|title=Terms of Muskrat Falls federal loan guarantee released|publisher=CBC News|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|date=Dec 4, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/harper-to-announce-muskrat-falls-deal-in-labrador-1.1147615|title=Harper to announce Muskrat Falls deal in Labrador|publisher=CBC News|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|date=Nov 29, 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/harper-reiterates-support-for-muskrat-falls-1.1190281|title=Harper 'reiterates support' for Muskrat Falls|publisher=CBC News|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|date=Sep 24, 2012 }}</ref> On December 17, 2012, the provincial government announced project sanction.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2012/exec/1217n11.htm|publisher=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador|date=December 17, 2012|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|title=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Announces Sanction of the Muskrat Falls Development}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/1-5b-maritime-link-approved-by-emera-inc-1.1219556|title=$1.5B Maritime Link approved by Emera Inc.|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News|date=Dec 18, 2012 }}</ref> Emera received approval to proceed with the Maritime Link from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/maritime-link-energy-project-approved-by-nova-scotia-s-uarb-1.2444774|title=Maritime Link energy project approved by Nova Scotia's UARB|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News|date=Nov 29, 2013 }}</ref> Financial close for the loan guarantee occurred in late 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2013/exec/1210n06.htm|title=Speaking notes delivered December 10 by the Honourable Kathy Dunderdale|publisher=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador|date=December 17, 2012|access-date=December 10, 2013}}</ref> On September 23, 2020, the first unit at Muskrat Falls was synced to the electricity grid in Labrador. Power from the remaining three units was originally expected to come online in the fall of 2021.<ref>{{cite web|title=Muskrat Falls Generating Project|url=https://muskratfalls.nalcorenergy.com/project-overview/muskrat-falls-hydroelectric-generation-facility/|website=Nalcor Energy}}</ref> However, there were delays in construction, including on the corresponding Labrador–Island Link which will transmit generated power to a converter outside [[St. John's, Newfoundland|St. John's]].<ref>{{cite web|date=November 29, 2021|last1=Callahan |first1=Brian |title=Hydro Announces Completion of Muskrat Falls Generating Station |url=https://vocm.com/2021/11/29/muskrat-falls-station/ |access-date=24 January 2022 |website=VOCM |language=en}}</ref> |
||
On June 23, 2021, Premier [[Andrew Furey]] announced Nalcor Energy would be dismantled and folded into [[Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=June 23, 2021|title=Nalcor Energy to be no more: Crown corporation being folded into N.L. Hydro|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nalcor-press-conference-june-23-1.6076644|website=[[CBC News]]}}</ref> |
|||
In April 2023, Jennifer Williams, CEO of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, announced the completion of the final successful test of the 1100 km transmission link to Newfoundland. Commissioning by the federal government will be announced following the completion of paperwork. Originally approved in 2012 with an anticipated price tag of around $7.4 billion, the costs of the project increased to more than $13 billion.<ref>{{Cite web|date=April 12, 2023|title=Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project in N.L. considered commissioned: CEO |website=Globalnews.ca |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/9619115/muskrat-falls-hydroelectric-project-in-n-l-considered-commissioned-ceo/ |access-date=2023-04-16}}</ref> |
|||
==Technical plan== |
==Technical plan== |
||
===Generation=== |
===Generation=== |
||
Reservoir impoundment was completed in 2019 with the flooding of 41 |
Reservoir impoundment was completed in 2019 with the flooding of 41 km<sup>2</sup> of land to create the 101 km<sup>2</sup> reservoir. Containment is by a two-part concrete dam totalling 757 metres long. This will power an 834 MW generating station.<ref name="lower-churchill-project">{{cite web |title=Muskrat Falls Development Generation and Transmission |url=https://www.gov.nl.ca/lowerchurchillproject/backgrounder_7.htm |website=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador |access-date=21 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226142338/https://www.gov.nl.ca/lowerchurchillproject/backgrounder_7.htm |archive-date=26 December 2018 |url-status=dead }}</ref> |
||
===Transmission=== |
===Transmission=== |
||
Power |
Power is transmitted to [[Newfoundland (island)|Newfoundland]] via a 350 kV [[high-voltage direct current]] line with a capacity of 900 MW. The total length is 1,100 km, of which 30 km are [[submarine power cable]]s under the [[Strait of Belle Isle]].<ref name="lower-churchill-project"/> Construction began in 2014 and ended in 2018.<ref name="holly">{{cite web |last1=McKenzie-Sutter |first1=Holly |title=Transmission link between Labrador and Newfoundland energized as Muskrat Falls project nears completion |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/article-transmission-link-between-labrador-and-newfoundland-energized-as/ |publisher=The Globe and Mail|date=June 27, 2018|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> |
||
Power |
Power is transmitted from [[Stephenville, Newfoundland and Labrador|Stephenville]] on Newfoundland to [[Nova Scotia]] via a 200 kV 180 km sub-sea line to [[Point Aconi, Nova Scotia|Point Aconi]] on [[Cape Breton Island]] with a capacity of 500 MW. Construction was a 1.2 billion dollar joint venture between Nalcor and [[Emera]].<ref name="lower-churchill-project"/> The link came online in December 2017.<ref>{{cite web |title=New power transmission towers connect Muskrat Falls, mainland Nova Scotia |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/4367990/muskrat-falls-nova-scotia/ |website=Global News |date=August 2, 2018 |access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> |
||
Once on |
Once on Newfoundland and the mainland of the [[Maritimes]], power is distributed via the existing grid. Emera hopes to sell surplus power via a proposed 563 km underwater transmission line from [[New Brunswick]] to [[Massachusetts]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Withers |first1=Paul |title=Halifax-based Emera makes plans for $2B Atlantic Link |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/halifax-based-emera-preparing-plans-for-atlantic-link-1.3931778 |website=CBC |access-date=21 July 2019|date=Jan 12, 2017 }}</ref> |
||
==Environmental impact== |
==Environmental impact== |
||
In late 2006, [[Nalcor]] registered the generation components of the Lower Churchill Project, including both [[Gull Island, Labrador|Gull Island]] and Muskrat Falls, for [[environmental assessment]] with the provincial and federal governments. The provincial and federal government agreed to a combined review process that would fulfill the requirements of both levels of government, resulting in the formation of a Joint Review Panel. In 2010, the focus shifted to Muskrat Falls only. The environmental assessment for the transmission lines was done separately and was conducted in 2013. Many Indigenous peoples had serious concerns about how the land and wildlife would be changed by the development. Negotiations between the [[Innu Nation]] and the provincial government began in 2006, resulting in the New Dawn (Tshash Petapen) Agreement, finalized in 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2011/exec/1118n11.htm|title=A New Dawn for the Labrador Innu|date=November 18, 2011|publisher=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador| |
In late 2006, [[Nalcor]] registered the generation components of the Lower Churchill Project, including both [[Gull Island, Labrador|Gull Island]] and Muskrat Falls, for [[environmental assessment]] with the provincial and federal governments. The provincial and federal government agreed to a combined review process that would fulfill the requirements of both levels of government, resulting in the formation of a Joint Review Panel. In 2010, the focus shifted to Muskrat Falls only. The environmental assessment for the transmission lines was done separately and was conducted in 2013. Many Indigenous peoples had serious concerns about how the land and wildlife would be changed by the development. Negotiations between the [[Innu Nation]] and the provincial government began in 2006, resulting in the New Dawn (Tshash Petapen) Agreement, finalized in 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2011/exec/1118n11.htm|title=A New Dawn for the Labrador Innu|date=November 18, 2011|publisher=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> This agreement included an Impacts and Benefits Agreement (IBA), a Redress Agreement related to damage caused by the Churchill Falls development, and an agreement in principle about the Innu Nation’s land claim. Upon the ratification of the New Dawn Agreement, the Innu Nation indicated that the project was acceptable to them. |
||
In 2016, researchers from [[Harvard University]] |
In 2016, researchers from [[Harvard University]] suggested that [[methylmercury]] levels in fish would rise as a result of the project.<ref>{{cite web |title=Inadequate consultation on the Muskrat Falls project |url=https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/december-2016/inadequate-consultation-on-the-muskrat-falls-project/ |website=Policy Options|date=December 13, 2016 |first=Bill|last=Flowers|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.saltwire.com/news/canada/methylmercury-levels-downstream-from-muskrat-falls-concern-researcher-522926/|title=Methylmercury levels downstream from Muskrat Falls concern researcher|publisher=Saltwire Network|date=November 20, 2016|first=Evan|last=Careen|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> After protests led by Indigenous groups in Central Labrador in 2016, an agreement was reached by Labrador’s three Indigenous groups ([[Nunatsiavut]] Government, [[Innu Nation]] and the [[NunatuKavut]] Community Council) and the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador outlining the establishment of an independent committee to make recommendations on mitigating potential impacts of methylmercury on human health from the Lower Churchill Project at Muskrat Falls, Labrador.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://ieaclabrador.ca/timeline/|title=Timeline - Independent Expert Advisory Committee|work=Independent Expert Advisory Committee|access-date=2018-10-30|language=en-US}}</ref> In 2018, the committee recommended{{snd}}among other things{{snd}}wetland capping to stem the release of [[methylmercury]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nunatsiavut-asks-premier-to-stop-flooding-1.5220209|title=Nunatsiavut president pleads with premier to pump the brakes on Muskrat Falls flooding |date=Jul 22, 2019 |publisher=CBC News|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/advisory-committee-recommendations-about-muskrat-falls-deserve-action-chair-299449/|title=Advisory committee recommendations about Muskrat Falls deserve action: chair|first=Ashley|last=Fitzpatrick|publisher=The Telegram|date=April 8, 2019 |access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/united-nations-calls-for-methyl-mercury-mitigation-at-muskrat-falls-320088/|title=United Nations calls for methyl mercury mitigation at Muskrat Falls|first=David|last=Maher|publisher=The Telegram|date=June 7, 2019 |access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> |
||
During the Muskrat Falls inquiry in 2019, it was revealed the provincial government wouldn’t be completing [[wetland]] [[In situ capping of subaqueous waste|capping]] at the Muskrat Falls reservoir as previously planned.<ref> |
During the Muskrat Falls inquiry in 2019, it was revealed the provincial government wouldn’t be completing [[wetland]] [[In situ capping of subaqueous waste|capping]] at the Muskrat Falls reservoir as previously planned.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/newfoundland-and-labrador-government-unintentionally-missed-muskrat-falls-wetland-capping-deadline-329855/|title=Newfoundland and Labrador government 'unintentionally' missed Muskrat Falls wetland capping deadline|first=David|last=Maher|publisher=The Telegram|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|date=July 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/no-time-left-for-reservoir-work-prior-to-flooding-deputy-minister-tells-muskrat-falls-inquiry-324859/|title=No time left for reservoir work prior to flooding, deputy minister tells Muskrat Falls Inquiry|first=Ashley|last=Fitzpatrick|publisher=The Telegram|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|date=June 20, 2019}}</ref> The $30 million designated for the capping was split up and offered to all three Indigenous governments, with the [[Innu|Innu Nation]] and [[NunatuKavut]] accepting.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/2-of-3-indigenous-groups-agreement-1.5221624|title=Methylmercury deal struck with 2 of 3 Labrador Indigenous groups|date=Jul 23, 2019|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/10-million-dollar-contract-1.5223142|title=Nalcor's $10M deal with NunatuKavut hammered out in a page and a half|date=Jul 24, 2019|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News|first=Bailery|last=White}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nunatsiavut-wetland-capping-deadline-1.5242775|title=Government skipped methylmercury deadline then offered 'hush money,' says Nunatsiavut president|date=Aug 11, 2019|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News}}</ref> Nalcor had applied for a permit in July 2018 to carry out the approximately 13 hectares of wetland capping{{snd}}essentially pouring sand and stone over a small area of wetland near the reservoir{{snd}}but the permit was never approved by the Department of Municipal Affairs and Environment.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/andrew-parsons-response-wetland-capping-investigation-1.5257932|title=Liberal minister dismisses call for investigation into Muskrat Falls wetland capping failure|date=Aug 23, 2019|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News}}</ref> Premier [[Dwight Ball]] later said wetland capping would have only decreased methylmercury levels by two per cent.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thetelegram.com/news/last-supper-held-tonight-by-muskrat-falls-protestors-339659/|title="Last supper" held tonight by Muskrat Falls protestors|date=Aug 6, 2019|publisher=The Telegram|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/muskrat-coady-capping-1.5192445|title=Too late to mitigate: Inquiry hears how wetland capping no longer a Muskrat option|date=Jun 27, 2019|access-date=Nov 29, 2020|publisher=CBC News|first=Terry|last=Roberts}}</ref> |
||
==Cost overruns and public inquiry== |
==Cost overruns and public inquiry== |
||
The project is more than $6 billion over budget<ref name="cox">{{cite web|date=May 16, 2019 |last1=Cox |first1=Sarah |title=A reckoning for Muskrat Falls |url=https://thenarwhal.ca/a-reckoning-for-muskrat-falls/ |website=The Narwhal | |
The project is more than $6 billion over budget,<ref name="cox">{{cite web|date=May 16, 2019 |last1=Cox |first1=Sarah |title=A reckoning for Muskrat Falls |url=https://thenarwhal.ca/a-reckoning-for-muskrat-falls/ |website=The Narwhal |access-date=21 July 2019}}</ref> and five years late {{as of|2022|lc=on}}. Projected cost overruns exceeding 70% from $7.4 billion to $12.7 billion due to poor planning, lack of engineering experience, and related assumptions that were invalid, misleading or later turned out to be incorrect led Nalcor CEO Stan Marshall to say that the project was a [[boondoggle]].<ref name="Boondoggle">{{cite web|date=June 24, 2016|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/nalcor-energy-head-to-give-update-on-troubled-muskrat-falls-hydro-project/article30605602/|title='Project was not the right choice': Muskrat Falls estimate surpasses $11-billion|author=Sue Bailey|publisher=The Globe and Mail|access-date=2016-06-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Roberts |first1=Terry |title=Muskrat Falls: A story of unchecked oilmen and their boondoggle hydro project |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/muskrat-boondoggle-reasons-1.5088786 |publisher=CBC News |access-date=Nov 29, 2020 |date=Apr 19, 2019}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | In 2017, [[Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador|Premier]] Dwight Ball called a public inquiry into the project,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/newfoundland-premier-announces-inquiry-into-muskrat-falls-project/article36431531/|title=Newfoundland Premier announces inquiry into Muskrat Falls project|publisher=The Globe and Mail|date=September 29, 2017|first=Andrew|last=Vaughan|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> which took place between 2018 and 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2017/exec/1120n05.aspx|title=Premier Ball Announces Muskrat Falls Public Inquiry|publisher=Government of Newfoundland and Labrador|language=en|date=November 20, 2017|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> In the inquiry report, Commissioner Richard LeBlanc concluded the government failed its duty to residents by predetermining that the megaproject would proceed no matter what. In his report, LeBlanc concluded that the business case, which assumed the Muskrat Falls project was the lowest-cost power option, was “questionable.” LeBlanc said that the project’s economics were not sufficiently tested and that Nalcor failed to consider all potentially viable power options. LeBlanc said that Nalcor concealed information that could have undermined the business case for the project from the public and government.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-nl-government-to-release-final-report-from-muskrat-falls-inquiry/|title=Final report from Muskrat Falls inquiry released to the public|publisher=The Globe and Mail|date=March 10, 2020|first=Holly|last=McKenzie-Sutter|access-date=Nov 29, 2020}}</ref> |
||
In July 2021, [[Prime Minister of Canada|Prime Minister]] [[Justin Trudeau]] announced that the [[Government of Canada]] would provide the project with $5.2 billion of financial support to compensate for its large cost overrun (from $6.2 billion to over $13 billion) and to enable the province to maintain the price of power at a competitive rate (14.7 cents per kilowatt-hour).<ref>{{Cite web|date=July 28, 2021|title=$5.2B deal reached between feds, N.L. government to stave off skyrocketing power bills|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/rate-mitigation-muskrat-falls-trudeau-furey-announcement-1.6120454|website=[[CBC News]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=July 27, 2021|title=Ottawa to give N.L. billions of dollars to offset Muskrat Falls costs|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/muskrat-falls-hydro-newfoundland-labrador-1.6119276|website=[[CBC News]]}}</ref> The [[government of Quebec]] and [[Bloc Québécois]] [[Members of Parliament]] protested against this subsidy, which they claimed provided unfair competition to their own [[Hydro Québec]] [[power company]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thenarwhal.ca/muskrat-falls-hydro-dam-trudeau-bailout/ |title=Trudeau offers $5.2 billion bailout for Newfoundland and Labrador's beleaguered Muskrat Falls hydro dam|publisher=The Narwhal (Victoria, BC)|date=July 29, 2021 |access-date=Oct 16, 2022}}</ref> The [[Sheshatshiu Innu First Nation|Innu Nation]] protested the decision stating they had not been consulted.<ref>{{Cite web|date=Oct 14, 2021|title=Innu Nation repeatedly blindsided by Muskrat Falls announcements, letters show|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/innu-nation-not-tolerate-consultations-1.6209097|website=[[CBC News]]}}</ref> The Innu Nation also raised concerns about the compensation claimed by the [[Innu]] and how cost overruns may reduce the amount of Innu royalties received under the 2011 impact and benefits agreement.<ref>{{Cite web|date=Aug 3, 2021|title=Muskrat Falls deal 'betrayed the Innu people,' says Innu Nation|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/innu-nation-muskrat-falls-agreement-1.6127949|website=[[CBC News]]}}</ref> |
|||
In September 2024, the federal government provided a $500 million bailout for [[Nova Scotia Power]] to avoid a nearly 20% rate raises over the next few years due to issues with reliable transmission from the project. In the five years since it went online, Muskrat Falls has had issues with low production and software issues affecting the transmission to Newfoundland, forcing Nova Scotia Power to buy electricity from more expensive sources even though the undersea connection to Nova Scotia had without delays or cost overruns.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Michael |first=Tutton |date=September 16, 2024 |title=Federal $500M bailout for Muskrat Falls power delays to keep N.S. rate hikes in check |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/10758009/muskrat-falls-nova-scotia-power/ |access-date=December 18, 2024 |work=[[Global News]] |agency=[[The Canadian Press]]}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In 2017, [[Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador|Premier]] |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
⚫ | |||
*[[Churchill Falls Generating Station]] |
*[[Churchill Falls Generating Station]] |
||
*[[Hydro-Québec's electricity transmission system]] |
|||
*[[List of HVDC projects]] |
*[[List of HVDC projects]] |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist|30em}} |
{{Reflist|30em}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
[[Category:Hydroelectric power stations in Newfoundland and Labrador]] |
[[Category:Hydroelectric power stations in Newfoundland and Labrador]] |
||
Line 80: | Line 89: | ||
[[Category:HVDC transmission lines]] |
[[Category:HVDC transmission lines]] |
||
[[Category:Roller-compacted concrete dams]] |
[[Category:Roller-compacted concrete dams]] |
||
[[Category:Political scandals in Canada]] |
|||
[[Category:Megaprojects]] |
[[Category:Megaprojects]] |
||
[[Category:Newfoundland and Labrador political scandals]] |
Latest revision as of 04:19, 19 December 2024
Muskrat Falls Generation Station | |
---|---|
Location of Muskrat Falls in Newfoundland and Labrador | |
Location | Labrador, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada |
Coordinates | 53°14′44″N 60°46′22″W / 53.24556°N 60.77278°W |
Construction began | 2013 [1] |
Opening date | September 23, 2020 |
Construction cost | $12.7 billion |
Owner(s) | Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro |
Dam and spillways | |
Type of dam | Roller compacted concrete |
Impounds | Churchill River |
Elevation at crest | 39.5 m[2] |
Spillways | 2 |
Spillway type | 1 overflow spillway and 1 spillway with submerged radial gates[3]: 87–88 |
Spillway capacity | 5930 m3/s [2]: 21 |
Reservoir | |
Normal elevation | 39 m [2]: 20 |
Power Station | |
Turbines | 4 x 206 MW Kaplan turbines [2]: 23 |
Installed capacity | 824 MW[3]: 86 |
Capacity factor | 62.3% |
Annual generation | 4.5 TWh[3]: 86 |
The Muskrat Falls Generating Station is a hydroelectric generating station in the Labrador region of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. It comprises part of the remaining 35 per cent of the Churchill River that was not developed by the Churchill Falls Generating Station. The station at Muskrat Falls has a capacity of over 824 MW and provides 4.5 TWh of electricity per year.[4]
A $6.2 billion deal between Newfoundland and Labrador's Nalcor Energy and Halifax, Nova Scotia-based Emera to develop the project was announced in November 2010.[5] On November 30, 2012, a federal loan guarantee deal for financing of the project was signed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale and Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter.[6][7][8][9] On December 17, 2012, the provincial government announced project sanction.[10][11] Emera received approval to proceed with the Maritime Link from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in 2013.[12] Financial close for the loan guarantee occurred in late 2013.[13] On September 23, 2020, the first unit at Muskrat Falls was synced to the electricity grid in Labrador. Power from the remaining three units was originally expected to come online in the fall of 2021.[14] However, there were delays in construction, including on the corresponding Labrador–Island Link which will transmit generated power to a converter outside St. John's.[15]
On June 23, 2021, Premier Andrew Furey announced Nalcor Energy would be dismantled and folded into Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.[16]
In April 2023, Jennifer Williams, CEO of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, announced the completion of the final successful test of the 1100 km transmission link to Newfoundland. Commissioning by the federal government will be announced following the completion of paperwork. Originally approved in 2012 with an anticipated price tag of around $7.4 billion, the costs of the project increased to more than $13 billion.[17]
Technical plan
[edit]Generation
[edit]Reservoir impoundment was completed in 2019 with the flooding of 41 km2 of land to create the 101 km2 reservoir. Containment is by a two-part concrete dam totalling 757 metres long. This will power an 834 MW generating station.[18]
Transmission
[edit]Power is transmitted to Newfoundland via a 350 kV high-voltage direct current line with a capacity of 900 MW. The total length is 1,100 km, of which 30 km are submarine power cables under the Strait of Belle Isle.[18] Construction began in 2014 and ended in 2018.[19]
Power is transmitted from Stephenville on Newfoundland to Nova Scotia via a 200 kV 180 km sub-sea line to Point Aconi on Cape Breton Island with a capacity of 500 MW. Construction was a 1.2 billion dollar joint venture between Nalcor and Emera.[18] The link came online in December 2017.[20]
Once on Newfoundland and the mainland of the Maritimes, power is distributed via the existing grid. Emera hopes to sell surplus power via a proposed 563 km underwater transmission line from New Brunswick to Massachusetts.[21]
Environmental impact
[edit]In late 2006, Nalcor registered the generation components of the Lower Churchill Project, including both Gull Island and Muskrat Falls, for environmental assessment with the provincial and federal governments. The provincial and federal government agreed to a combined review process that would fulfill the requirements of both levels of government, resulting in the formation of a Joint Review Panel. In 2010, the focus shifted to Muskrat Falls only. The environmental assessment for the transmission lines was done separately and was conducted in 2013. Many Indigenous peoples had serious concerns about how the land and wildlife would be changed by the development. Negotiations between the Innu Nation and the provincial government began in 2006, resulting in the New Dawn (Tshash Petapen) Agreement, finalized in 2011.[22] This agreement included an Impacts and Benefits Agreement (IBA), a Redress Agreement related to damage caused by the Churchill Falls development, and an agreement in principle about the Innu Nation’s land claim. Upon the ratification of the New Dawn Agreement, the Innu Nation indicated that the project was acceptable to them.
In 2016, researchers from Harvard University suggested that methylmercury levels in fish would rise as a result of the project.[23][24] After protests led by Indigenous groups in Central Labrador in 2016, an agreement was reached by Labrador’s three Indigenous groups (Nunatsiavut Government, Innu Nation and the NunatuKavut Community Council) and the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador outlining the establishment of an independent committee to make recommendations on mitigating potential impacts of methylmercury on human health from the Lower Churchill Project at Muskrat Falls, Labrador.[25] In 2018, the committee recommended – among other things – wetland capping to stem the release of methylmercury.[26][27][28]
During the Muskrat Falls inquiry in 2019, it was revealed the provincial government wouldn’t be completing wetland capping at the Muskrat Falls reservoir as previously planned.[29][30] The $30 million designated for the capping was split up and offered to all three Indigenous governments, with the Innu Nation and NunatuKavut accepting.[31][32][33] Nalcor had applied for a permit in July 2018 to carry out the approximately 13 hectares of wetland capping – essentially pouring sand and stone over a small area of wetland near the reservoir – but the permit was never approved by the Department of Municipal Affairs and Environment.[34] Premier Dwight Ball later said wetland capping would have only decreased methylmercury levels by two per cent.[35][36]
Cost overruns and public inquiry
[edit]The project is more than $6 billion over budget,[37] and five years late as of 2022[update]. Projected cost overruns exceeding 70% from $7.4 billion to $12.7 billion due to poor planning, lack of engineering experience, and related assumptions that were invalid, misleading or later turned out to be incorrect led Nalcor CEO Stan Marshall to say that the project was a boondoggle.[38][39]
In 2017, Premier Dwight Ball called a public inquiry into the project,[40] which took place between 2018 and 2020.[41] In the inquiry report, Commissioner Richard LeBlanc concluded the government failed its duty to residents by predetermining that the megaproject would proceed no matter what. In his report, LeBlanc concluded that the business case, which assumed the Muskrat Falls project was the lowest-cost power option, was “questionable.” LeBlanc said that the project’s economics were not sufficiently tested and that Nalcor failed to consider all potentially viable power options. LeBlanc said that Nalcor concealed information that could have undermined the business case for the project from the public and government.[42]
In July 2021, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that the Government of Canada would provide the project with $5.2 billion of financial support to compensate for its large cost overrun (from $6.2 billion to over $13 billion) and to enable the province to maintain the price of power at a competitive rate (14.7 cents per kilowatt-hour).[43][44] The government of Quebec and Bloc Québécois Members of Parliament protested against this subsidy, which they claimed provided unfair competition to their own Hydro Québec power company.[45] The Innu Nation protested the decision stating they had not been consulted.[46] The Innu Nation also raised concerns about the compensation claimed by the Innu and how cost overruns may reduce the amount of Innu royalties received under the 2011 impact and benefits agreement.[47]
In September 2024, the federal government provided a $500 million bailout for Nova Scotia Power to avoid a nearly 20% rate raises over the next few years due to issues with reliable transmission from the project. In the five years since it went online, Muskrat Falls has had issues with low production and software issues affecting the transmission to Newfoundland, forcing Nova Scotia Power to buy electricity from more expensive sources even though the undersea connection to Nova Scotia had without delays or cost overruns.[48]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Construction schedule to first power" (JPG). Nalcor Energy. Retrieved 2014-07-26.
- ^ a b c d "Nalcor's submission to the Board of Commissioners" (PDF). Nalcor Energy. November 10, 2011. Retrieved December 27, 2011.
- ^ a b c Rae, P. (January 2012). "5". Report on Two Generation Expansion Alternatives for the Island Interconnected Electrical System (PDF) (Report). Vol. II. Winnipeg: Manitoba Hydro International. Retrieved 2014-07-26.
- ^ "Lower Churchill Project". Nalcor Energy. Archived from the original on November 29, 2016. Retrieved June 8, 2013.
- ^ McCarthy, Shawn (18 November 2010). "Churchill hydro deal signals era of Atlantic co-operation – The Globe and Mail". The Globe and Mail. Toronto.
- ^ Bailey, Sue (November 30, 2012). "Harper signs loan guarantee deal for Muskrat Falls despite Quebec's outcry". Global News. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Terms of Muskrat Falls federal loan guarantee released". CBC News. Dec 4, 2012. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Harper to announce Muskrat Falls deal in Labrador". CBC News. Nov 29, 2012. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Harper 'reiterates support' for Muskrat Falls". CBC News. Sep 24, 2012. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Announces Sanction of the Muskrat Falls Development". Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. December 17, 2012. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "$1.5B Maritime Link approved by Emera Inc". CBC News. Dec 18, 2012. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Maritime Link energy project approved by Nova Scotia's UARB". CBC News. Nov 29, 2013. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Speaking notes delivered December 10 by the Honourable Kathy Dunderdale". Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. December 17, 2012. Retrieved December 10, 2013.
- ^ "Muskrat Falls Generating Project". Nalcor Energy.
- ^ Callahan, Brian (November 29, 2021). "Hydro Announces Completion of Muskrat Falls Generating Station". VOCM. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
- ^ "Nalcor Energy to be no more: Crown corporation being folded into N.L. Hydro". CBC News. June 23, 2021.
- ^ "Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project in N.L. considered commissioned: CEO". Globalnews.ca. April 12, 2023. Retrieved 2023-04-16.
- ^ a b c "Muskrat Falls Development Generation and Transmission". Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
- ^ McKenzie-Sutter, Holly (June 27, 2018). "Transmission link between Labrador and Newfoundland energized as Muskrat Falls project nears completion". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "New power transmission towers connect Muskrat Falls, mainland Nova Scotia". Global News. August 2, 2018. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Withers, Paul (Jan 12, 2017). "Halifax-based Emera makes plans for $2B Atlantic Link". CBC. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
- ^ "A New Dawn for the Labrador Innu". Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. November 18, 2011. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Flowers, Bill (December 13, 2016). "Inadequate consultation on the Muskrat Falls project". Policy Options. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Careen, Evan (November 20, 2016). "Methylmercury levels downstream from Muskrat Falls concern researcher". Saltwire Network. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Timeline - Independent Expert Advisory Committee". Independent Expert Advisory Committee. Retrieved 2018-10-30.
- ^ "Nunatsiavut president pleads with premier to pump the brakes on Muskrat Falls flooding". CBC News. Jul 22, 2019. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Fitzpatrick, Ashley (April 8, 2019). "Advisory committee recommendations about Muskrat Falls deserve action: chair". The Telegram. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Maher, David (June 7, 2019). "United Nations calls for methyl mercury mitigation at Muskrat Falls". The Telegram. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Maher, David (July 4, 2019). "Newfoundland and Labrador government 'unintentionally' missed Muskrat Falls wetland capping deadline". The Telegram. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Fitzpatrick, Ashley (June 20, 2019). "No time left for reservoir work prior to flooding, deputy minister tells Muskrat Falls Inquiry". The Telegram. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Methylmercury deal struck with 2 of 3 Labrador Indigenous groups". CBC News. Jul 23, 2019. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ White, Bailery (Jul 24, 2019). "Nalcor's $10M deal with NunatuKavut hammered out in a page and a half". CBC News. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Government skipped methylmercury deadline then offered 'hush money,' says Nunatsiavut president". CBC News. Aug 11, 2019. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Liberal minister dismisses call for investigation into Muskrat Falls wetland capping failure". CBC News. Aug 23, 2019. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ ""Last supper" held tonight by Muskrat Falls protestors". The Telegram. Aug 6, 2019. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Roberts, Terry (Jun 27, 2019). "Too late to mitigate: Inquiry hears how wetland capping no longer a Muskrat option". CBC News. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Cox, Sarah (May 16, 2019). "A reckoning for Muskrat Falls". The Narwhal. Retrieved 21 July 2019.
- ^ Sue Bailey (June 24, 2016). "'Project was not the right choice': Muskrat Falls estimate surpasses $11-billion". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2016-06-24.
- ^ Roberts, Terry (Apr 19, 2019). "Muskrat Falls: A story of unchecked oilmen and their boondoggle hydro project". CBC News. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ Vaughan, Andrew (September 29, 2017). "Newfoundland Premier announces inquiry into Muskrat Falls project". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "Premier Ball Announces Muskrat Falls Public Inquiry". Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. November 20, 2017. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ McKenzie-Sutter, Holly (March 10, 2020). "Final report from Muskrat Falls inquiry released to the public". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved Nov 29, 2020.
- ^ "$5.2B deal reached between feds, N.L. government to stave off skyrocketing power bills". CBC News. July 28, 2021.
- ^ "Ottawa to give N.L. billions of dollars to offset Muskrat Falls costs". CBC News. July 27, 2021.
- ^ "Trudeau offers $5.2 billion bailout for Newfoundland and Labrador's beleaguered Muskrat Falls hydro dam". The Narwhal (Victoria, BC). July 29, 2021. Retrieved Oct 16, 2022.
- ^ "Innu Nation repeatedly blindsided by Muskrat Falls announcements, letters show". CBC News. Oct 14, 2021.
- ^ "Muskrat Falls deal 'betrayed the Innu people,' says Innu Nation". CBC News. Aug 3, 2021.
- ^ Michael, Tutton (September 16, 2024). "Federal $500M bailout for Muskrat Falls power delays to keep N.S. rate hikes in check". Global News. The Canadian Press. Retrieved December 18, 2024.