Jump to content

Talk:Sack of Singapore: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
== Malay Annals as a source ==
== Malay Annals as a source ==


Please note that the Malay Annals is semi-historical and is unreliable particularly for the history of ancient Singapura. It should not be used without historical analyses by historians, and any "fact" given in that book needed to be clearly attributed to that source. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 09:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Please note that the Malay Annals is semi-historical and is unreliable particularly for the history of ancient Singapura. It should not be used without historical analyses by historians, and any supposed "fact" given in that book needed to be clearly attributed to that source. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 09:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

This is actually very little reliable information for an article such as this. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 15:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:39, 19 December 2024

Malay Annals as a source

[edit]

Please note that the Malay Annals is semi-historical and is unreliable particularly for the history of ancient Singapura. It should not be used without historical analyses by historians, and any supposed "fact" given in that book needed to be clearly attributed to that source. Hzh (talk) 09:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually very little reliable information for an article such as this. Hzh (talk) 15:39, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]