User talk:DannyS712 bot: Difference between revisions
→Disambiguation page error: Reply |
|||
(352 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archives}} |
|||
== November 2018 == |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome to Wikipedia]]. I noticed that your username, "DannyS712 bot", may not meet Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Username policy|username policy]] because it contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally '''reserved for authorized [[WP:Bots|bot accounts]]'''. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a [[Wikipedia:Changing username|change of username]], or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. ''If you have been granted authorization for this bot account, feel free to delete this message.'' [[User:Zinnober9|Zinnober9]] ([[User talk:Zinnober9|talk]]) 06:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:{{reply to|Zinnober9}} This will be a bot account operated by me (DannyS712). For now, it is not approved because I have not being able to create a bot yet. I created this second account per the recommendations given at [[Help:Creating a bot#Implementation]]. Please don't block it. --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 16:50, 17 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
::{{reply to|DannyS712}} I was not under the impression from that article that users created the bot account prior to having a mission, but then I've never thought about creating a bot account for a task and may have misread it. It seems to me that you clearly know to not to use this account until after you have a mission approved, and give that your main account is not questionable, I don't see a reason to report this account as an unapproved bot. I wish you success with your bot process and approval! [[User:Zinnober9|Zinnober9]] ([[User talk:Zinnober9|talk]]) 04:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{reply to|Zinnober9}} Thanks! I found out that it was a lot harder to create a basic bot than I thought, so I kind-of gave up (for now), but I don't intend to use the account for anything else. --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 04:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{ping|Zinnober9}} Just FYI I've now officially created a bot. Thanks for not asking for it to be blocked! Also, I intend to redirect this page to my main talk, which would move your comments to one of my archives. I'd like to change the heading to "Bot account name" so that it better reflects the discussion. Would that be okay with you? Thanks, --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 21:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{ping|DannyS712}} Fine by me! Congrats! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zinnober9|Zinnober9]] ([[User talk:Zinnober9#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zinnober9|contribs]]) 23:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== |
== Task 3 – Draft categories == |
||
Hello. I noticed your bot converting draft cats to links, which is much better than deleting them; so thanks for that task. May I ask you to go one step further, and instead of converting it to links, embed the categories in template {{tl|Draft categories}} instead? The effect will be that the categories will be shown at the foot of the Draft page, without populating the categories, and when the draft is released, they will immediately populate the correct categories with no further intervention. |
|||
Hey. Just wanted to let you all know that I, your overlord and master, now have mass message sender perms, and wanted to test them out my sending you this message. Thanks, --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 20:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DannyS712@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:DannyS712/MMS_testing&oldid=880503544 --> |
|||
For example, instead of performing [[Special:Diff/1227098144|this edit]] at [[Draft:Gallo-Roman Theater of Lisieux]], you would do this instead: |
|||
== Convert categorization to links == |
|||
{{text diff |
|||
|1=<nowiki>{{Portal|Ancient Rome|Architecture |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Category:Ancient Roman theatres in France]] |
|||
[[Category:Roman amphitheatres in France]] |
|||
[[Category:Roman Gaul]]</nowiki> |
|||
|2=<nowiki>{{Portal|Ancient Rome|Architecture |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Draft categories| |
|||
[[Category:Ancient Roman theatres in France]] |
|||
[[Category:Roman amphitheatres in France]] |
|||
[[Category:Roman Gaul]] |
|||
}}</nowiki> |
|||
}} |
|||
* For example, see the footer of [[Draft:Contravention in French criminal law]], which uses this template. |
|||
* An example of a mainspace article which uses it is [[Tinio Brigade]]; they evidently forgot to remove the template, but that's what's so good about it, because it doesn't matter if they remove it or not, as categorization will work correctly either way, whereas if you forget to remove the colons from the links, they will not work correctly. |
|||
Would this change be possible? Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 00:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: This was inspired by [[User talk:Bearcat#Bots devoted to this|this subsection]] of a longer conversation, and an issue was raised about whether the scope of the bot could be broadened to all drafts, not just those with the submit template. Can it? I've left a related message at [[User talk:Primefac#PrimeBot and avoiding categories in Drafts]]. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 17:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* Is any change likely on this? Is there any way to stop this 'bot until it does? [[User:Andy Dingley|Andy Dingley]] ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 19:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:The key question here for me is does the AFHC script support {{tl|Draft categories}}, or does it need to be patched before this change is made? [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 04:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::[[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]], [[Special:Diff/1228298105|yes]].<span id="Qwerfjkl:1718130087480:User_talkFTTCLNDannyS712_bot" class="FTTCmt"> — [[User:Qwerfjkl|<span style="background:#1d9ffc; color:white; padding:5px; box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px;">Qwerfjkl</span>]][[User talk:Qwerfjkl|<span style="background:#79c0f2;color:white; padding:2px; box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px;">talk</span>]] 18:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)</span> |
|||
*:: {{u|Mdann52}}, I am unfamiliar with AFHC; an [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?search=AFHC+script+&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns2=1&ns4=1&ns10=1&ns12=1&ns828=1 advanced search] turned up [[WP:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script]] ([[WP:AFCH]])—is that what is meant? If so, would you mind elaborating on the connection between that and the topic question? Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 22:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::Yes it's the AFC Helper Script - it's important as it's the main tool reviewers use to process these submissions. If it wasn't supported by the script, we risk reviewers not cleaning the template up when approving. |
|||
*:::However, it sounds like the script handles it and the template works in mainspace, so my concerns are sorted. [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 05:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{od|*:::}} |
|||
Great, so that brings us back to square one: {{u|DannyS712}}, is the proposal above to use {{tl|Draft categories}} instead of links workable? [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 05:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] so technically my bot approval was only for converting to links ([[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 3]]) but I also am not quite sure how what regex to use other than having a single {{tl|Draft categories}} around ''each'' category, which would be a bit ugly. Let me think about this for a bit. A probably easier thing to do would be to update the helper script to restore categories like this (or at least I was going to suggest that, but it looks like it is already the case - https://github.com/wikimedia-gadgets/afc-helper/blob/d4d8ef6088bc99b96bf1c2247868cdb7819f06e7/src/modules/submissions.js#L545). --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 06:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
What is the purpose of converting categorization to links on draft articles, like this edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft%3AShelly_Chartier&type=revision&diff=881366560&oldid=881351089| here]? --[[User:Zaurus|Zaurus]] ([[User talk:Zaurus|talk]]) 17:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:: Understood, thanks. Imho, since it’s only a draft, only visible in the wikicode and not on the rendered page, it’s worth it, as ugly wikicode in exchange for saving countless hours of editor time is a good tradeoff. But let’s think some more about it and see what other opinions might be forthcoming from others. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 06:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Zaurus}} See [[WP:USERNOCAT]] and [[WP:DRAFTNOCAT]]: {{tq|user subpages that are draft versions of articles should be kept out of content categories}} and {{tq|Pages in the draft namespace are not articles, and thus do not belong in content categories}}. --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 18:06, 3 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::This is a very useful task I think. Before, people would often just remove the categories from drafts, which was off-putting for new users. Thanks Danny! |
|||
::It might be worth linking to [[WP:DRAFTNOCAT]] in the edit summary, though. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 09:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{ping|Joe Roe}} The edit summary links to [[User:DannyS712/DNC bot]], which until now was a redirect to the bot's user page. I'll start working on actually making the page now --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 09:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{ping|Joe Roe}} {{done}} see [[User:DannyS712/DNC bot]] --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 09:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:: {{u|DannyS712}}, Not sure what flavor of regex you are using, but what about this via perl: |
|||
== BRFA trial message == |
|||
<pre style="margin-left:4em; width:80%"> |
|||
# Match one or more contiguous category lines |
|||
This is a test mass message to trial [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 8]]. In the line below, I will include a link to <code><nowiki>[[DannyS712]]</nowiki></code> that, for the sake of the trial, is considered to have been an error - the link should have been <code><nowiki>[[User:DannyS712]]</nowiki></code>. I will then have my bot fix the error on user talk pages, marking the edit as minor so as to avoid triggering the "new message" notification. |
|||
my $pattern = qr/^(?:\[\[Category:[^]]+\]\]\n?)+$/m; |
|||
# Replacement pattern to embed in Draft categories template |
|||
Link: [[User:DannyS712]] |
|||
$text =~ s/($pattern)/{{Draft categories |\n$1}}/s; |
|||
</pre> |
|||
:: [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 07:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks, --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 09:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:DannyS712@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:DannyS712_bot/Task_8_test&oldid=887221923 --> |
|||
<small>'''Listed at:''' [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#Friendly support for Draft categories – feedback request]]. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 19:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== Files tagged to be moved to Commons == |
|||
{{u|DannyS712}} Still interested. Can we use {{tl|Draft categories}} instead? This would be a huge time-saver, if it could be implemented. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 08:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hi {{u|DannyS712}}. I'm just curious as to why your bot is removing {{tl|Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} templates from various files, particularly files which have been reviewed by a file reviewer as being OK to be moved. There's really no need for Wikipedia to locally host files which are released under a [[:WP:ICT/FL|free license]] or which are within in the [[:WP:PD|public domain]] for one reason or another; so, they are moved to Common which is more suited for hosting images and because it makes it easier for other Wikimedia projects to use the files. There are some files such as [[:WP:NFC|non-free content]] or [[:Template:PD-ineligible-USonly]] files which shouldn't be moved, but none of these should be tagged for a move to Commons in the first place. If there's something about the licensing of the files your bot is removing the templates from that it finds is questionable, it might be a good idea post something about this at [[:WP:MCQ]] to let others know so that they can take a closer look. Files are occasionally licensed incorrectly and sometimes even need to be deleted when their licensing issues cannot be resolved. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 13:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Marchjuly}} I was doing it at the request of the person who had added the tags - see [[Wikipedia:Bot requests#One Shot: Removing Commons eligibility assessment from images reviewed by ShakespeareFan00]] --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 18:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::Thanks for clarifying. -- [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 21:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:Permission to modify the bot approval requested at [[Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 3]] --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 04:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== [[:Draft:Manjaros]] == |
|||
:: Thanks, monitoring... [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 04:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: Fwiw, an analogous issue regarding an [[WP:AFCH|AFC helper script]] that performs similar actions to the bot regarding draft categories was previously raised by {{u|Novem Linguae}} [https://github.com/wikimedia-gadgets/afc-helper/issues/256 here], as reported by a user at [[WT:AFC#AFCH Helper Script and Categories|WT:AFC]]. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 09:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:: I saw the good news about your [[Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 3|bot modification approval]]. Please keep me informed as things progress, or if you hit any roadblocks. Thanks, [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 22:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] okay - I'm back in town and should be able to do this soon, I'm keeping a to-do list of bot stuff and its on it [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 02:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::@[[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] should be doing this now, first edit at [[Special:Diff/1236674064]] --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 00:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::: Thanks. Is there a test cases page somewhere? If it's okay with you, I might like to add a test case or two. For example: if there is a blank line (two newlines) between categories, I think it's okay if you don't catch that case; we just have to handle that in the documentation, and say it won't be handled if they do that. Ditto with white space before or after the colon or brackets, and so on. Of course, if you can create a stronger regex that would skip extra newlines and white space, so much the better, but not if that risks making the regex more fragile. I could add a test case for that, if you like; lmk. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 05:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::If you want to create a test cases page that would be great, no objections from me - the bot currently doesn't pay attention to whether things are within nowiki tags are not, so if you put all of the categories into a nowiki block then the categories won't take effect but the bot would still process it (as long as it is categorized as an AFC draft with categories, which you can add manually). Feel free to create this as a subpage of the bot user page --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 07:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::: Still open; please do not archive. [[User:Mathglot|Mathglot]] ([[User talk:Mathglot|talk]]) 07:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== June 2024 == |
|||
Can you check the operation of this BOT on [[:Draft:Manjaros]]. There were no ''user'' categories only Categories placed by the [[Template:AfC]] (which I may not have applied correctly. Thankyou. [[User:Djm-leighpark|Djm-leighpark]] ([[User talk:Djm-leighpark|talk]]) 22:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|Djm-leighpark}} Yes, I agree that the bug was likely caused by the misapplication of the template. I have replaced the substituted version of the template with a transclusion, ensuring that it is categorized correctly in AfC categories without the bot "fixing" it. If such issues arise in the future, I'll try to code a sanity check in the bot. Thanks for letting me know of the mistake, --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 13:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Draft:Tenzing Norgay Trainor]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been or will be [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. |
|||
== User:Chenthil Vel == |
|||
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Draft talk:Tenzing Norgay Trainor|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|relevant noticeboards]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. |
|||
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. ''Corrupted category list in draft article already disabled as in {{tlx|draftcat}} section. Ignored report on this bug on bot. Please fix this''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] ([[User talk:Geraldo Perez|talk]]) 01:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Pinging [[User:DannyS712]]. The categories were already enclosed with {{tl|draftcat}}. Looking at line 77, you're using the regex <code><nowiki>{{Draft categories\|[^{}]+}}</nowiki></code>, but that doesn't match the redirect this user is using, and you might want to consider this for the future. |
|||
At [[User:Chenthil Vel]], the bot has commented out [[:Category:Tamil Nadu Wikipedians]], a category specifically intended for user pages. Is this a bot error, or has that category not been set up correctly? -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 08:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:Anyways, I've gone ahead and changed the template to {{tl|Draft categories}} so the bot will stop editing it. Thanks, [[User:Rusty4321|<span style="background-color:#272;color:#ff0">'''Rusty4321'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Rusty4321|talk]] [[Special:Contribs/Rusty4321|contribs]]</sup> 02:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|John of Reading}} Technically, I think it was a bug with a different bot, but I can't verify it now since the edits have been processed. In the future, I can keep an eye an edits that were not made to a user subpage. --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 09:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::@[[User:Rusty4321|Rusty4321]] thanks for letting me know, I will update the bot when I have a chance. --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 05:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] I don't log in with the bot account manually and wasn't pinged on the reports above so I didn't know about it - in the future if you just let me know on my talk page (or with a ping like I just got) I can fix this. I didn't "ignore" the report, just didn't see it --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 05:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::@[[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] @[[User:Rusty4321|Rusty4321]] should be working now, I updated the code https://github.com/DannyS712/bot/commit/3d4e469a3e94aa70805e8a5a5f9d1519cadc8c5b and just deployed it. Please let me know if this happens again --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 05:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed == |
|||
(More) A quick look through this account's contributions shows many other similar edits. Also some edits like [//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:The_C_of_E/AFC&diff=prev&oldid=888768299 this one], adding a colon to a category that is already commented out by HTML comments. -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 08:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Hi DannyS712 bot. Thank you for your work on [[2024 Malaysia A2 Amateur League]]. Another editor, [[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]], has reviewed it as part of [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol|new pages patrol]] and left the following comment: |
|||
(More!) OK, I see the problem. For example, [[:Category:Indian Wikipedians]] is indeed a polluted category, because the article [[Art of Time Ensemble]] has been added to it. But the solution is to fix the article, not to edit the user page of every Indian Wikipedian. -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 09:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:{{ping|John of Reading}} indeed, that was the bug - I'll screen for 'Wikipedians' in the category name. As for the html comment - I suppose the edit isn't needed, but I don't think there is any harm in it, and I'm not sure how to avoid it... --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 09:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{Bq|1=DannyBot should not be reviewing redirects to draftspace.}} |
|||
:{{ping|John of Reading}} I just rolled back all of the ones to base user pages that were wrong. Lessons learned: Ignore categories with "Wikipedian", "User", or "Wikiproject". Anything else you noticed? --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 09:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::No -- [[User:John of Reading|John of Reading]] ([[User talk:John of Reading|talk]]) 09:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>MPGuy2824<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF --> |
|||
-[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]] ([[User talk:MPGuy2824|talk]]) 13:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Ping|DannyS712}} FYI. -[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]] ([[User talk:MPGuy2824|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::@[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]] thanks, but the bot is operating as expected - the redirect shouldn't have been created in the first place. I think this is enough of an edge case that it is unlikely to be a problem, since redirects to drafts are quickly deleted by patrolling admins --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 04:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{tq|redirects to drafts are quickly deleted by patrolling admins}}. This is true if the relevant speedy deletion tags are added. I did that for this redirect, and not the editor who moved the article to draftspace. The problem is that most NPP scripts and reports only care about unreviewed redirects (and articles) and a report just happened to catch this redirect before your bot reviewed it. Anyway, if this is hard to code for, then you should assign it a low priority. If you do get other editors/reviewers complaining about stuff like this, then you can reconsider that priority. Happy editing! -[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]] ([[User talk:MPGuy2824|talk]]) 09:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== DannyS712 bot III "double patrolling" redirects == |
|||
{{ping|DannyS712}} DannyS712 bot III seems to be patrolling some redirects twice. See the logs of [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=ATLASerials ATLASerials] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Roy_cooper Roy cooper] for examples. Thanks, [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color:#1E90FF;">Queen of Hearts</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<i style="color:#FF1493;">talk</i>]]</sup> 00:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah it is because I just restarted the bot and there might be some duplicates, it shouldn't be happening anymore [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 00:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Bot is down == |
|||
@[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] [[User:NotAGenious|NotAGenious]] ([[User talk:NotAGenious|talk]]) 17:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Re|DannyS712}} I guess you fixed the problem then, but the bot has gone down again on 25 Sep ( going by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=&user=DannyS712+bot+III&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&wpfilters%5B%5D=newusers&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist]). Please check. -[[User:MPGuy2824|MPGuy2824]] ([[User talk:MPGuy2824|talk]]) 05:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Backup bot is [[User:DreamRimmer bot|DreamRimmer bot]]. – [[User:DreamRimmer|<b style="color:black; font-family: Tahoma">DreamRimmer</b>]] ('''[[User talk:DreamRimmer|talk]]''') 06:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Question about a recent patrol == |
|||
Why did the bot patrol {{no redirect|YOU SUCK!}}—is it because I am on the whitelist and I refined the target? I was sort of intentionally leaving that in a slightly improved state for a second set of eyes to have a glance and determination at, which is why I was wondering. <small>— [[User:Godsy|<span style="color:#39A78E;">'''Godsy'''</span>]]<sup> ([[User talk:Godsy|TALK]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/Godsy|<span style="color:#DAA520;">CONT</span>]])</sub></small> 03:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I have the same question. [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot III 66|The relevant BRFA]] was for redirects ''created'' by certain users, not redirects ''edited'' by certain users{{snd}}so the bot seems to be operating outside its approved scope. Is it a bug? [[User:Jlwoodwa|jlwoodwa]] ([[User talk:Jlwoodwa|talk]]) 20:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== BLP error == |
|||
Bot patrolled an unsourced BLP written in Bosnian [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=165605135]. The page has been reverted as redirect (at present) by another user. [[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small>]] ([[User talk:Significa liberdade|talk]]) 19:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Disambiguation page error == |
|||
I've made an error and need help. I made a mispelling in moving [[Daniel Klein]] to [[Daniel Klein (disambugation)]] not knowing that the page [[Daniel Klein (disambiguation)]] already exists. I need help moving [[Daniel Klein (disambugation)]] back to [[Daniel Klein]] and deleting the latter. Thanks! {{ping|GiantSnowman}} |
|||
[[User:Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez|'''''elias_fdafs''''']] •  ([[User talk:Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez|'''''Let's Talk!''''']] [[Special:Contributions/User:Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez|'''''What Have I Done?''''']]) 16:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez|User:Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez]]: This is a 'bot' (automated) account which cannot respond to messages. See [[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests]] instead. [[User:Rusty Cat|<span style="background-color:#15c;color:#ff0">'''Rusty'''</span>]] [[User talk:Rusty Cat|🐈]] 02:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:03, 21 December 2024
|
|
Task 3 – Draft categories
[edit]Hello. I noticed your bot converting draft cats to links, which is much better than deleting them; so thanks for that task. May I ask you to go one step further, and instead of converting it to links, embed the categories in template {{Draft categories}} instead? The effect will be that the categories will be shown at the foot of the Draft page, without populating the categories, and when the draft is released, they will immediately populate the correct categories with no further intervention.
For example, instead of performing this edit at Draft:Gallo-Roman Theater of Lisieux, you would do this instead:
− | {{Portal|Ancient Rome|Architecture
}}
[[Category:Ancient Roman theatres in France]]
[[Category:Roman amphitheatres in France]]
[[Category:Roman Gaul]] | + | {{Portal|Ancient Rome|Architecture
}}
{{Draft categories|
[[Category:Ancient Roman theatres in France]]
[[Category:Roman amphitheatres in France]]
[[Category:Roman Gaul]]
}} |
- For example, see the footer of Draft:Contravention in French criminal law, which uses this template.
- An example of a mainspace article which uses it is Tinio Brigade; they evidently forgot to remove the template, but that's what's so good about it, because it doesn't matter if they remove it or not, as categorization will work correctly either way, whereas if you forget to remove the colons from the links, they will not work correctly.
Would this change be possible? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- This was inspired by this subsection of a longer conversation, and an issue was raised about whether the scope of the bot could be broadened to all drafts, not just those with the submit template. Can it? I've left a related message at User talk:Primefac#PrimeBot and avoiding categories in Drafts. Mathglot (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is any change likely on this? Is there any way to stop this 'bot until it does? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The key question here for me is does the AFHC script support {{Draft categories}}, or does it need to be patched before this change is made? Mdann52 (talk) 04:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Mdann52, yes. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Mdann52, I am unfamiliar with AFHC; an advanced search turned up WP:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script (WP:AFCH)—is that what is meant? If so, would you mind elaborating on the connection between that and the topic question? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it's the AFC Helper Script - it's important as it's the main tool reviewers use to process these submissions. If it wasn't supported by the script, we risk reviewers not cleaning the template up when approving.
- However, it sounds like the script handles it and the template works in mainspace, so my concerns are sorted. Mdann52 (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- The key question here for me is does the AFHC script support {{Draft categories}}, or does it need to be patched before this change is made? Mdann52 (talk) 04:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Great, so that brings us back to square one: DannyS712, is the proposal above to use {{Draft categories}} instead of links workable? Mathglot (talk) 05:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot so technically my bot approval was only for converting to links (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 3) but I also am not quite sure how what regex to use other than having a single {{Draft categories}} around each category, which would be a bit ugly. Let me think about this for a bit. A probably easier thing to do would be to update the helper script to restore categories like this (or at least I was going to suggest that, but it looks like it is already the case - https://github.com/wikimedia-gadgets/afc-helper/blob/d4d8ef6088bc99b96bf1c2247868cdb7819f06e7/src/modules/submissions.js#L545). --DannyS712 (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Understood, thanks. Imho, since it’s only a draft, only visible in the wikicode and not on the rendered page, it’s worth it, as ugly wikicode in exchange for saving countless hours of editor time is a good tradeoff. But let’s think some more about it and see what other opinions might be forthcoming from others. Mathglot (talk) 06:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- DannyS712, Not sure what flavor of regex you are using, but what about this via perl:
# Match one or more contiguous category lines my $pattern = qr/^(?:\[\[Category:[^]]+\]\]\n?)+$/m; # Replacement pattern to embed in Draft categories template $text =~ s/($pattern)/{{Draft categories |\n$1}}/s;
Listed at: Wikipedia:Bot requests#Friendly support for Draft categories – feedback request. Mathglot (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
DannyS712 Still interested. Can we use {{Draft categories}} instead? This would be a huge time-saver, if it could be implemented. Mathglot (talk) 08:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Permission to modify the bot approval requested at Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 3 --DannyS712 (talk) 04:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, monitoring... Mathglot (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fwiw, an analogous issue regarding an AFC helper script that performs similar actions to the bot regarding draft categories was previously raised by Novem Linguae here, as reported by a user at WT:AFC. Mathglot (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- I saw the good news about your bot modification approval. Please keep me informed as things progress, or if you hit any roadblocks. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot okay - I'm back in town and should be able to do this soon, I'm keeping a to-do list of bot stuff and its on it DannyS712 (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot should be doing this now, first edit at Special:Diff/1236674064 --DannyS712 (talk) 00:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Is there a test cases page somewhere? If it's okay with you, I might like to add a test case or two. For example: if there is a blank line (two newlines) between categories, I think it's okay if you don't catch that case; we just have to handle that in the documentation, and say it won't be handled if they do that. Ditto with white space before or after the colon or brackets, and so on. Of course, if you can create a stronger regex that would skip extra newlines and white space, so much the better, but not if that risks making the regex more fragile. I could add a test case for that, if you like; lmk. Mathglot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to create a test cases page that would be great, no objections from me - the bot currently doesn't pay attention to whether things are within nowiki tags are not, so if you put all of the categories into a nowiki block then the categories won't take effect but the bot would still process it (as long as it is categorized as an AFC draft with categories, which you can add manually). Feel free to create this as a subpage of the bot user page --DannyS712 (talk) 07:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Still open; please do not archive. Mathglot (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to create a test cases page that would be great, no objections from me - the bot currently doesn't pay attention to whether things are within nowiki tags are not, so if you put all of the categories into a nowiki block then the categories won't take effect but the bot would still process it (as long as it is categorized as an AFC draft with categories, which you can add manually). Feel free to create this as a subpage of the bot user page --DannyS712 (talk) 07:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Is there a test cases page somewhere? If it's okay with you, I might like to add a test case or two. For example: if there is a blank line (two newlines) between categories, I think it's okay if you don't catch that case; we just have to handle that in the documentation, and say it won't be handled if they do that. Ditto with white space before or after the colon or brackets, and so on. Of course, if you can create a stronger regex that would skip extra newlines and white space, so much the better, but not if that risks making the regex more fragile. I could add a test case for that, if you like; lmk. Mathglot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot should be doing this now, first edit at Special:Diff/1236674064 --DannyS712 (talk) 00:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Mathglot okay - I'm back in town and should be able to do this soon, I'm keeping a to-do list of bot stuff and its on it DannyS712 (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Tenzing Norgay Trainor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Corrupted category list in draft article already disabled as in {{draftcat}}
section. Ignored report on this bug on bot. Please fix this Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging User:DannyS712. The categories were already enclosed with {{draftcat}}. Looking at line 77, you're using the regex
{{Draft categories\|[^{}]+}}
, but that doesn't match the redirect this user is using, and you might want to consider this for the future. - Anyways, I've gone ahead and changed the template to {{Draft categories}} so the bot will stop editing it. Thanks, Rusty4321 talk contribs 02:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Rusty4321 thanks for letting me know, I will update the bot when I have a chance. --DannyS712 (talk) 05:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez I don't log in with the bot account manually and wasn't pinged on the reports above so I didn't know about it - in the future if you just let me know on my talk page (or with a ping like I just got) I can fix this. I didn't "ignore" the report, just didn't see it --DannyS712 (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Geraldo Perez @Rusty4321 should be working now, I updated the code https://github.com/DannyS712/bot/commit/3d4e469a3e94aa70805e8a5a5f9d1519cadc8c5b and just deployed it. Please let me know if this happens again --DannyS712 (talk) 05:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
[edit]Hi DannyS712 bot. Thank you for your work on 2024 Malaysia A2 Amateur League. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
DannyBot should not be reviewing redirects to draftspace.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: FYI. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- @MPGuy2824 thanks, but the bot is operating as expected - the redirect shouldn't have been created in the first place. I think this is enough of an edge case that it is unlikely to be a problem, since redirects to drafts are quickly deleted by patrolling admins --DannyS712 (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
redirects to drafts are quickly deleted by patrolling admins
. This is true if the relevant speedy deletion tags are added. I did that for this redirect, and not the editor who moved the article to draftspace. The problem is that most NPP scripts and reports only care about unreviewed redirects (and articles) and a report just happened to catch this redirect before your bot reviewed it. Anyway, if this is hard to code for, then you should assign it a low priority. If you do get other editors/reviewers complaining about stuff like this, then you can reconsider that priority. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- @MPGuy2824 thanks, but the bot is operating as expected - the redirect shouldn't have been created in the first place. I think this is enough of an edge case that it is unlikely to be a problem, since redirects to drafts are quickly deleted by patrolling admins --DannyS712 (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
DannyS712 bot III "double patrolling" redirects
[edit]@DannyS712: DannyS712 bot III seems to be patrolling some redirects twice. See the logs of ATLASerials and Roy cooper for examples. Thanks, Queen of Hearts talk 00:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah it is because I just restarted the bot and there might be some duplicates, it shouldn't be happening anymore DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Bot is down
[edit]@DannyS712 NotAGenious (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: I guess you fixed the problem then, but the bot has gone down again on 25 Sep ( going by [1]). Please check. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Backup bot is DreamRimmer bot. – DreamRimmer (talk) 06:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Question about a recent patrol
[edit]Why did the bot patrol YOU SUCK!—is it because I am on the whitelist and I refined the target? I was sort of intentionally leaving that in a slightly improved state for a second set of eyes to have a glance and determination at, which is why I was wondering. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have the same question. The relevant BRFA was for redirects created by certain users, not redirects edited by certain users – so the bot seems to be operating outside its approved scope. Is it a bug? jlwoodwa (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
BLP error
[edit]Bot patrolled an unsourced BLP written in Bosnian [2]. The page has been reverted as redirect (at present) by another user. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation page error
[edit]I've made an error and need help. I made a mispelling in moving Daniel Klein to Daniel Klein (disambugation) not knowing that the page Daniel Klein (disambiguation) already exists. I need help moving Daniel Klein (disambugation) back to Daniel Klein and deleting the latter. Thanks! @GiantSnowman: elias_fdafs • (Let's Talk! What Have I Done?) 16:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- @User:Elías Fortaleza de la Fuerza Sánchez: This is a 'bot' (automated) account which cannot respond to messages. See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests instead. Rusty 🐈 02:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)