M1150 assault breacher vehicle: Difference between revisions
m lc per MOS:EXPABBR Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
FV102Striker (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
(39 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| image = Combined Resolve III 141024-A-LO967-008.jpg |
| image = Combined Resolve III 141024-A-LO967-008.jpg |
||
| image_size = 300 |
| image_size = 300 |
||
| caption = A US Army M1150 |
| caption = A US Army M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle during an exercise in 2014 |
||
| origin = United States |
| origin = United States |
||
| type = [[Military engineering vehicle]] |
| type = [[Military engineering vehicle]] |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| is_vehicle = yes |
| is_vehicle = yes |
||
| is_missile = |
| is_missile = |
||
| is_UK = |
| is_UK = |
||
| service = 2009–present |
| service = 2009–present |
||
| used_by = [[United States Army]]<br />[[United States Marine Corps]] |
| used_by = [[United States Army]]<br />[[United States Marine Corps]] (2009–{{circa}} 2023)<br />[[Armed Forces of Ukraine]] |
||
| wars = [[War in Afghanistan ( |
| wars = *[[War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)|War in Afghanistan]] |
||
*[[Russo-Ukrainian war]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
**[[Russian invasion of Ukraine]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
| design_date = |
| design_date = |
||
| manufacturer = |
| manufacturer = |
||
| unit_cost = $14 million (FY 2009)<ref> https://www.deagel.com/Armies/M1150%20Assault%20Breacher%20Vehicle/a004118</ref> |
|||
| unit_cost = |
|||
| production_date = |
| production_date = |
||
| number = 239 |
| number = 239 |
||
Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
| armour = |
| armour = |
||
| primary_armament = [[M58 MICLIC]] |
| primary_armament = [[M58 MICLIC]] |
||
| secondary_armament = 1 [[50 BMG]] [[M2 machine gun]] mount on top of the vehicle. |
| secondary_armament = 1 [[.50 BMG]] [[M2 machine gun]] mount on top of the vehicle. |
||
| engine = |
| engine = |
||
| engine_power = |
| engine_power = |
||
Line 48: | Line 50: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle (ABV |
The '''M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle''' ('''ABV''') is a U.S. military mine- and explosives-clearing vehicle, based on the [[M1 Abrams]] [[chassis]], equipped with a [[mine plow]] and [[Mine-clearing line charge|line charges]]. Its first large scale use by the [[US Marines]] (USMC) was in the joint [[International Security Assistance Force|ISAF]]-Afghan'' [[Operation Moshtarak]]'' in Southern Afghanistan during the [[War in Afghanistan (2001–14)|War in Afghanistan]] in 2010 against the [[Taliban insurgency]]. |
||
The USMC had retired the ABV as of 2023. |
|||
==Design and purpose== |
==Design and purpose== |
||
These tracked [[Armoured fighting vehicle|combat vehicles]] were |
These tracked [[Armoured fighting vehicle|combat vehicles]] were specifically designed to clear pathways for troops and other vehicles through [[minefields]] and along [[roadside bomb]]s and [[improvised explosive device]]s. The 72-ton, {{convert|40|ft|m|adj=mid|-long}} vehicles are based on the [[M1 Abrams]] with a 1,500 horsepower engine, but fitted with only a .[[50 caliber machine gun|50 cal machine gun]] and a front-mounted {{convert|15|ft|m|adj=mid|-wide}} plow, supported by metallic skis that glide on the dirt and armed with nearly {{convert|7,000|lb|kg}} of explosives. |
||
They are equipped with [[ |
They are equipped with [[linear demolition charge system]] (LDCS): rockets carrying [[C-4 (explosive)|C-4]] explosives up to 100–150 yards forward, detonating hidden explosives at a safe distance, so that troops and vehicles can pass through safely.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/11/AR2010021101755.html "Marines push 'The Breacher' against Taliban lines"]{{dead link|date=June 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, ''Washington Post''</ref> |
||
In the 1990s, the [[U.S. Army]] decided it could not afford to continue developing complicated, maintenance-heavy vehicles for this purpose. The [[M1 Abrams#Variants and upgrades|Grizzly program]] was cancelled in 2001, and the prototype developed never made it to the production lines. The Marine Corps however persisted and funded its own development and testing. The main body of the final model of the ABV is built on the [[General Dynamics]] chassis that is used for the M1A1 Abrams main battle tank. Pearson Engineering of the UK provided the specially designed plow and the other mine-clearing accessories.<ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2010/0211/Marines-roll-out-Assault-Breacher-Vehicles-for-Marjah-Afghanistan-offensive "Marines roll out Assault Breacher Vehicles for Marjah Afghanistan offensive - When Marines rumble into the Taliban stronghold of Marjah in Helmand province for one of the largest offensives of the Afghanistan war, they'll be battle-testing a powerful new weapon, the Assault Breacher Vehicle"], ''Christian Science Monitor''</ref><ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/world/us-marines-push-their-ultimate-mine-clearance-weapon-the-breacher-against-taliban-lines-84113127.html "US Marines push their ultimate mine clearance weapon, 'The Breacher,' against Taliban lines"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, ''San Francisco Examiner''</ref><ref>[http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,210215,00.html "MV-22 and ABV Meet Expectations"], Military.com</ref> |
In the 1990s, the [[U.S. Army]] decided it could not afford to continue developing complicated, maintenance-heavy vehicles for this purpose. The [[M1 Abrams#Variants and upgrades|Grizzly program]] was cancelled in 2001, and the prototype developed never made it to the production lines. The Marine Corps however persisted and funded its own development and testing. The main body of the final model of the ABV is built on the [[General Dynamics]] chassis that is used for the M1A1 Abrams main battle tank. Pearson Engineering of the UK provided the specially designed plow and the other mine-clearing accessories.<ref>[http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2010/0211/Marines-roll-out-Assault-Breacher-Vehicles-for-Marjah-Afghanistan-offensive "Marines roll out Assault Breacher Vehicles for Marjah Afghanistan offensive - When Marines rumble into the Taliban stronghold of Marjah in Helmand province for one of the largest offensives of the Afghanistan war, they'll be battle-testing a powerful new weapon, the Assault Breacher Vehicle"], ''Christian Science Monitor''</ref><ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/world/us-marines-push-their-ultimate-mine-clearance-weapon-the-breacher-against-taliban-lines-84113127.html "US Marines push their ultimate mine clearance weapon, 'The Breacher,' against Taliban lines"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, ''San Francisco Examiner''</ref><ref>[http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,210215,00.html "MV-22 and ABV Meet Expectations"], Military.com</ref> |
||
==Operational history== |
==Operational history== |
||
[[Image:M1 Assault Breacher Vehicle.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Marines with [[2nd Combat Engineer Battalion]] launch a line charge from an |
[[Image:M1 Assault Breacher Vehicle.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Marines with [[2nd Combat Engineer Battalion]] launch a line charge from an assault breacher vehicle.]] |
||
In the morning of December 3, 2009, for the first time breachers were used in combat, when Marines pushed into the Taliban stronghold [[Nawzad, Afghanistan|Nawzad]] during ''[[Operation Cobra's Anger]]'' in Helmand province, on their way to another Taliban stronghold [[Marjah]], {{convert|380|mi|km|abbr=off|sp=us}} southwest of [[Kabul]], that was to be assaulted in February 2010.<ref>[http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2009/1209_marineassault/ ""Marine assault - Operation Cobra's Anger"]</ref><ref>[http://www.marines.mil/unit/iimef/2ndmeb/Pages/MarinesBlastThroughNowZadWithAssaultBreacherVehicles.aspx "Marines Blast Through Now Zad With Assault Breacher Vehicles"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100218155056/http://www.marines.mil/unit/iimef/2ndmeb/Pages/MarinesBlastThroughNowZadWithAssaultBreacherVehicles.aspx |date=February 18, 2010}}</ref><ref>[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/80130.html "Monster mine-clearing tank goes to work in Afghanistan"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091208093605/http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/80130.html |date=December 8, 2009 }}</ref><ref>[http://thetension.blogspot.com/2009/12/combat-camera-us-marines-take-now-zad.html "Combat Camera: US Marines Take Now Zad During Operation Cobra's Anger, Part 1"]</ref><ref>[http://www.armyrecognition.com/2009_mois_news_actualites/december_2009_worldwide_news_army_military_defence_industries_industry_exhibition_equipment_armoured.html "United States Marines Corps deployed for the time in Afghanistan the new engineer armoured ABV Assault Breacher Vehicle"]</ref> |
In the morning of December 3, 2009, for the first time breachers were used in combat, when Marines pushed into the Taliban stronghold [[Nawzad, Afghanistan|Nawzad]] during ''[[Operation Cobra's Anger]]'' in Helmand province, on their way to another Taliban stronghold [[Marjah]], {{convert|380|mi|km|abbr=off|sp=us}} southwest of [[Kabul]], that was to be assaulted in February 2010.<ref>[http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2009/1209_marineassault/ ""Marine assault - Operation Cobra's Anger"]</ref><ref>[http://www.marines.mil/unit/iimef/2ndmeb/Pages/MarinesBlastThroughNowZadWithAssaultBreacherVehicles.aspx "Marines Blast Through Now Zad With Assault Breacher Vehicles"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100218155056/http://www.marines.mil/unit/iimef/2ndmeb/Pages/MarinesBlastThroughNowZadWithAssaultBreacherVehicles.aspx |date=February 18, 2010}}</ref><ref>[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/80130.html "Monster mine-clearing tank goes to work in Afghanistan"] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091208093605/http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/80130.html |date=December 8, 2009 }}</ref><ref>[http://thetension.blogspot.com/2009/12/combat-camera-us-marines-take-now-zad.html "Combat Camera: US Marines Take Now Zad During Operation Cobra's Anger, Part 1"]</ref><ref>[http://www.armyrecognition.com/2009_mois_news_actualites/december_2009_worldwide_news_army_military_defence_industries_industry_exhibition_equipment_armoured.html "United States Marines Corps deployed for the time in Afghanistan the new engineer armoured ABV Assault Breacher Vehicle"]</ref> |
||
Line 64: | Line 68: | ||
On February 11, 2010, two breachers fired explosive line charges in the desert outside Sistani to test Taliban defenses on the eve of ''Operation Moshtarak'' when closing off the enemy's escape route.<ref>[http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/11/taliban-escape-route-sealed-attack/ "Taliban escape route sealed before attack"]</ref><ref>[http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/us-and-afghan-troops-ring-taliban-stronghold-227745.html "US and Afghan troops ring Taliban stronghold"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>[http://durangoherald.com/sections/News/2010/02/11/Marines_test_Taliban_defenses_before_Afghan_attack/ "Marines test Taliban defenses before Afghan attack"]</ref><ref>[http://uk.news.yahoo.com/19/20100210/img/pwl-afghanistan-95b79c4-85cac14aa052.html "Two U.S. Marine Assault Breacher Vehicles (ABV), test-fire explosive line charges in the desert outside Sistani"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> |
On February 11, 2010, two breachers fired explosive line charges in the desert outside Sistani to test Taliban defenses on the eve of ''Operation Moshtarak'' when closing off the enemy's escape route.<ref>[http://washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/11/taliban-escape-route-sealed-attack/ "Taliban escape route sealed before attack"]</ref><ref>[http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/us-and-afghan-troops-ring-taliban-stronghold-227745.html "US and Afghan troops ring Taliban stronghold"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>[http://durangoherald.com/sections/News/2010/02/11/Marines_test_Taliban_defenses_before_Afghan_attack/ "Marines test Taliban defenses before Afghan attack"]</ref><ref>[http://uk.news.yahoo.com/19/20100210/img/pwl-afghanistan-95b79c4-85cac14aa052.html "Two U.S. Marine Assault Breacher Vehicles (ABV), test-fire explosive line charges in the desert outside Sistani"]{{dead link|date=October 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> |
||
On February 13, 2010, on the first day of the operation, breachers of the US Marines 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion succeeded in digging and blasting ''"safety lanes"'' through the numerous [[minefield]]s laid by the Taliban around Marjah.<ref>[ |
On February 13, 2010, on the first day of the operation, breachers of the US Marines 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion succeeded in digging and blasting ''"safety lanes"'' through the numerous [[minefield]]s laid by the Taliban around Marjah.<ref>[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-jan-31-la-fg-afghan-marines31-2010jan31-story.html "Marine assault vehicles key to Afghan strategy – As U.S. and Afghan troops prepare for an offensive in Helmand province, the Assault Breacher Vehicle – a cross between a tank and a bulldozer – is intended to conquer the terrain and roadside bombs"]</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20110604200209/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/afghanistan/article7026348.ece "Taliban leaders flee as marines hit stronghold"]</ref> |
||
According to a report in December 2009, there were then five ABVs in Afghanistan, and the U.S. Marines were said to have plans to field a total of 52 by 2012, of which about 34 have already had been produced. The U.S. Army was said to have ordered 187.<ref>[http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac952d8a7-8924-4343-8565-08d1f224bd7b&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest "New Marine Tech Slams into Helmand"]</ref> |
According to a report in December 2009, there were then five ABVs in Afghanistan, and the U.S. Marines were said to have plans to field a total of 52 by 2012, of which about 34 have already had been produced. The U.S. Army was said to have ordered 187.<ref>[http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac952d8a7-8924-4343-8565-08d1f224bd7b&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest "New Marine Tech Slams into Helmand"]</ref> |
||
By August 2013, six ABVs were brought to the [[Korean Peninsula]] to be used by the [[2nd Infantry Division (United States)|2nd Infantry Division]] (2ID) to provide the capability for deliberate and in-stride breaching of mine fields and complex obstacles. The ABVs would allow the 2ID to clear the heavily mined [[Korean Demilitarized Zone]], believed to contain tens of thousands to millions of mines. A previous deployment of [[MRAP]] mine-resistant vehicles to Korea caused North Korea to accuse their presence as vehicles that would cross the DMZ for an attack of the country; the MRAPs were later withdrawn due to their unsuitability for the terrain. North Korea has not publicly responded to the |
By August 2013, six ABVs were brought to the [[Korean Peninsula]] to be used by the [[2nd Infantry Division (United States)|2nd Infantry Division]] (2ID) to provide the capability for deliberate and in-stride breaching of mine fields and complex obstacles. The ABVs would allow the 2ID to clear the heavily mined [[Korean Demilitarized Zone]], believed to contain tens of thousands to millions of mines. A previous deployment of [[MRAP]] mine-resistant vehicles to South Korea caused North Korea to accuse their presence as vehicles that would cross the DMZ for an attack of the country; the MRAPs were later withdrawn due to their unsuitability for the terrain. North Korea has not publicly responded to the ABVs' arrival on the peninsula.<ref>[http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/08/16/mrap-no-good-for-korea-2id-decides.html?ESRC=todayinmil.sm MRAP No Good for Korea, 2ID Decides] - Military.com, 16 August 2013</ref><ref>[http://www.armyrecognition.com/august_2013_defense_industry_military_army_news_uk/the_abv_assault_breacher_vehicle_is_deployed_by_u.s._army_in_south_korea_2008132.html The ABV Assault Breacher Vehicle is deployed by U.S. Army in South Korea] – Armyrecognition.com, 20 August 2013</ref> |
||
In 2019, the USMC's [[Force Design 2030]] decision to divest of its Armor component included the ABV. This divestment transferred the majority their ABV inventory to the Army. This action resulted in the US Army being the sole branch of the US Military with under-armor mechanical breach capability.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gonzales |first=Matt |date=2021-12-01 |title=Force Design 2030: Divesting to meet the future threat |url=https://www.marines.mil/News/News-Display/Article/2857680/force-design-2030-divesting-to-meet-the-future-threat/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.marines.mil%2FNews%2FNews-Display%2FArticle%2F2857680%2Fforce-design-2030-divesting-to-meet-the-future-threat%2F |access-date=2023-08-11 |website=United States Marine Corps Flagship |language=en-US}}</ref> As of 2023, the USMC had divested the ABV.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Keys |first1=William |last2=Richard |first2=Ronald |title=Marine combat engineers no longer capable of supporting the infantry |url=https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/opinion/2023/03/06/marine-combat-engineers-no-longer-capable-of-supporting-the-infantry/ |access-date=16 August 2023 |work=Marine Corps Times |date=6 March 2023 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In April 2021 the US Department of State approved the sale of 29 M1150s to Australia, where they will be operated by the [[Australian Army]].<ref name="Australia">{{cite news |last1=Kadib |first1=Charbel |title=Defence procures $2.5bn in AFVs, CH-47F Chinooks |url=https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/land-amphibious/7974-defence-procures-2-5bn-in-afvs-ch-47f-chinooks |access-date=3 May 2021 |work=Defence Connect |date=3 May 2021}}</ref> |
||
=== Russo-Ukrainian War=== |
|||
====Russian invasion of Ukraine ==== |
|||
In November 2023 an ABV was shown in Ukraine during a ceremony to commemorate Ukraine's ''Day of Rocket Forces and Artillery'' and ''Engineering Troops Day''.<ref>{{Cite web |date=3 November 2023 |title=On the occasion of the Day of Missile Forces and Artillery and the Engineering Troops Day, Volodymyr Zelenskyy presents state awards to Ukraine's defenders |url=https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/z-nagodi-dnya-raketnih-vijsk-i-artileriyi-ta-dnya-inzhenerni-86773 |access-date=3 November 2023 |website=PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY Official website}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Ukraine's Troops Were Reinforced by the American M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle {{!}} Defense Express |url=https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/ukraines_troops_were_reinforced_by_the_american_m1150_assault_breacher_vehicle-8453.html |access-date=2023-11-04 |website=en.defence-ua.com |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
On February 22, 2024 an M1150 was lost in combat for the first time in Avdiivka, Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/02/22/ukraine-has-only-a-few-american-made-assault-breacher-vehicles-it-just-lost-one-outside-avdiivka/?sh=2626c4131764|title=Ukraine Has Only a Few American-Made Assault Breacher Vehicles. It Just Lost One Outside Avdiivka.|date=22 February 2024}}</ref> On 3 March, another M1150 was visually confirmed lost in combat near the village of Berdychi, Avdiivka.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Second Abrams tank & mine-clearing vehicle destroyed in Ukraine conflict – media|url=https://www.globalvillagespace.com/second-abrams-tank-mine-clearing-vehicle-destroyed-in-ukraine-conflict-media/|access-date=2024-03-04|website=Conflict media}}</ref> |
|||
==Operators== |
|||
===Current operators=== |
|||
*{{USA}}: [[United States Army]], 149xM1150 vehicles.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=2023-12-31 |title=Chapter Three: North America: Regional trends in 2022 16; United States: defence policy and economics 18; Canada: defence policy 28; Arms procurements and deliveries 29; Armed forces data section 32 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/04597222.2023.2162715 |journal=The Military Balance |language=en |volume=123 |issue=1 |pages=16–49 |doi=10.1080/04597222.2023.2162715 |s2cid=256848739 |issn=0459-7222}}</ref> |
|||
*{{UKR}}: Vehicles supplied by the United States.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Axe |first1=David |title=The United States Quietly Gave Ukraine the Assault Breacher, a Special Vehicle for Breaking Through Russian Defenses |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/11/03/the-united-states-quietly-gave-ukraine-the-assault-breacher-a-special-vehicle-for-breaking-through-russian-defenses/?sh=5ec1edba3240 |website=Forbes |access-date=10 November 2023}}</ref> |
|||
*{{RUS}}: 1x captured from Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Nikolov |first1=Boyko |title=US mine-clearing vehicle M1150 falls into Russian possession |url=https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/04/27/us-mine-clearing-vehicle-m1150-falls-into-russian-possession/}}</ref> |
|||
===Future operators=== |
|||
*{{AUS}}: 29xM1150 vehicles.<ref name="Australia"/> |
|||
*{{POL}}: 25xM1150 for the 18th Mechanized Division.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ratka |first1=Damian |title=Assault Breacher Vehicles for the Polish Army |url=https://defence24.com/armed-forces/land-forces/assault-breacher-vehicles-for-the-polish-army |website=defence24.com |access-date=29 December 2023 |language=en |date=21 November 2023}}</ref> |
|||
*{{ROU}}: 4xM1150 vehicles.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/romania-m1a2-abrams-main-battle-tanks|title=Romania – M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks|work=[[Defense Security Cooperation Agency]]|date=9 November 2023}}</ref> |
|||
* {{BHR}}: 8xM1150 vehicles<ref name="Bahrain Abrams">{{cite web|url=https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/bahrain-m1a2-abrams-main-battle-tanks|title=BAHRAIN – M1A2 ABRAMS MAIN BATTLE TANKS|language=en|work=Defense Security Cooperation Agency|date=19 March 2024}}</ref> |
|||
===Former operators=== |
|||
⚫ | In April 2021 the US Department of State approved the sale of 29 M1150s to Australia, where they will be operated by the [[Australian Army]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kadib |first1=Charbel |title=Defence procures $2.5bn in AFVs, CH-47F Chinooks |url=https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/land-amphibious/7974-defence-procures-2-5bn-in-afvs-ch-47f-chinooks |access-date=3 May 2021 |work=Defence Connect |date=3 May 2021}}</ref> |
||
*{{USA}}: [[United States Marine Corps]], retired in 2023. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Military engineering vehicles]] |
* [[Military engineering vehicles]] |
||
* [[Combat engineering]] |
* [[Combat engineering]] |
||
* [[Trojan |
* [[Trojan armoured engineer vehicle]] – similar British engineering vehicle |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 84: | Line 114: | ||
*[http://www.military.com/video/combat-vehicles/armored-vehicles/assault-breacher-vehicle-deadliest-tech/2081742310001/ Video] from [[Discovery Science (Asia)#Programming|Deadliest Tech]] |
*[http://www.military.com/video/combat-vehicles/armored-vehicles/assault-breacher-vehicle-deadliest-tech/2081742310001/ Video] from [[Discovery Science (Asia)#Programming|Deadliest Tech]] |
||
{{Tanks converted to armored vehicles}} |
|||
[[Category:Armored fighting vehicles of the United States]] |
[[Category:Armored fighting vehicles of the United States]] |
||
[[Category:Tracked military vehicles]] |
[[Category:Tracked military vehicles]] |
||
[[Category:Military vehicles introduced in the 2000s]] |
[[Category:Military vehicles introduced in the 2000s]] |
||
[[Category:Mine warfare countermeasures]] |
Latest revision as of 14:58, 21 December 2024
M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle | |
---|---|
Type | Military engineering vehicle |
Place of origin | United States |
Service history | |
In service | 2009–present |
Used by | United States Army United States Marine Corps (2009–c. 2023) Armed Forces of Ukraine |
Wars | |
Production history | |
Unit cost | $14 million (FY 2009)[1] |
No. built | 239 |
Specifications | |
Length | 40 feet (12 meters) |
Crew | 2 |
Main armament | M58 MICLIC |
Secondary armament | 1 .50 BMG M2 machine gun mount on top of the vehicle. |
The M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle (ABV) is a U.S. military mine- and explosives-clearing vehicle, based on the M1 Abrams chassis, equipped with a mine plow and line charges. Its first large scale use by the US Marines (USMC) was in the joint ISAF-Afghan Operation Moshtarak in Southern Afghanistan during the War in Afghanistan in 2010 against the Taliban insurgency.
The USMC had retired the ABV as of 2023.
Design and purpose
[edit]These tracked combat vehicles were specifically designed to clear pathways for troops and other vehicles through minefields and along roadside bombs and improvised explosive devices. The 72-ton, 40-foot-long (12 m) vehicles are based on the M1 Abrams with a 1,500 horsepower engine, but fitted with only a .50 cal machine gun and a front-mounted 15-foot-wide (4.6 m) plow, supported by metallic skis that glide on the dirt and armed with nearly 7,000 pounds (3,200 kg) of explosives.
They are equipped with linear demolition charge system (LDCS): rockets carrying C-4 explosives up to 100–150 yards forward, detonating hidden explosives at a safe distance, so that troops and vehicles can pass through safely.[2]
In the 1990s, the U.S. Army decided it could not afford to continue developing complicated, maintenance-heavy vehicles for this purpose. The Grizzly program was cancelled in 2001, and the prototype developed never made it to the production lines. The Marine Corps however persisted and funded its own development and testing. The main body of the final model of the ABV is built on the General Dynamics chassis that is used for the M1A1 Abrams main battle tank. Pearson Engineering of the UK provided the specially designed plow and the other mine-clearing accessories.[3][4][5]
Operational history
[edit]In the morning of December 3, 2009, for the first time breachers were used in combat, when Marines pushed into the Taliban stronghold Nawzad during Operation Cobra's Anger in Helmand province, on their way to another Taliban stronghold Marjah, 380 miles (610 kilometers) southwest of Kabul, that was to be assaulted in February 2010.[6][7][8][9][10]
On February 11, 2010, two breachers fired explosive line charges in the desert outside Sistani to test Taliban defenses on the eve of Operation Moshtarak when closing off the enemy's escape route.[11][12][13][14]
On February 13, 2010, on the first day of the operation, breachers of the US Marines 2nd Combat Engineer Battalion succeeded in digging and blasting "safety lanes" through the numerous minefields laid by the Taliban around Marjah.[15][16]
According to a report in December 2009, there were then five ABVs in Afghanistan, and the U.S. Marines were said to have plans to field a total of 52 by 2012, of which about 34 have already had been produced. The U.S. Army was said to have ordered 187.[17]
By August 2013, six ABVs were brought to the Korean Peninsula to be used by the 2nd Infantry Division (2ID) to provide the capability for deliberate and in-stride breaching of mine fields and complex obstacles. The ABVs would allow the 2ID to clear the heavily mined Korean Demilitarized Zone, believed to contain tens of thousands to millions of mines. A previous deployment of MRAP mine-resistant vehicles to South Korea caused North Korea to accuse their presence as vehicles that would cross the DMZ for an attack of the country; the MRAPs were later withdrawn due to their unsuitability for the terrain. North Korea has not publicly responded to the ABVs' arrival on the peninsula.[18][19]
In 2019, the USMC's Force Design 2030 decision to divest of its Armor component included the ABV. This divestment transferred the majority their ABV inventory to the Army. This action resulted in the US Army being the sole branch of the US Military with under-armor mechanical breach capability.[20] As of 2023, the USMC had divested the ABV.[21]
In April 2021 the US Department of State approved the sale of 29 M1150s to Australia, where they will be operated by the Australian Army.[22]
Russo-Ukrainian War
[edit]Russian invasion of Ukraine
[edit]In November 2023 an ABV was shown in Ukraine during a ceremony to commemorate Ukraine's Day of Rocket Forces and Artillery and Engineering Troops Day.[23][24]
On February 22, 2024 an M1150 was lost in combat for the first time in Avdiivka, Ukraine.[25] On 3 March, another M1150 was visually confirmed lost in combat near the village of Berdychi, Avdiivka.[26]
Operators
[edit]Current operators
[edit]- United States: United States Army, 149xM1150 vehicles.[27]
- Ukraine: Vehicles supplied by the United States.[28]
- Russia: 1x captured from Ukraine.[29]
Future operators
[edit]- Australia: 29xM1150 vehicles.[22]
- Poland: 25xM1150 for the 18th Mechanized Division.[30]
- Romania: 4xM1150 vehicles.[31]
- Bahrain: 8xM1150 vehicles[32]
Former operators
[edit]- United States: United States Marine Corps, retired in 2023.
See also
[edit]- Military engineering vehicles
- Combat engineering
- Trojan armoured engineer vehicle – similar British engineering vehicle
References
[edit]- ^ https://www.deagel.com/Armies/M1150%20Assault%20Breacher%20Vehicle/a004118
- ^ "Marines push 'The Breacher' against Taliban lines"[dead link ], Washington Post
- ^ "Marines roll out Assault Breacher Vehicles for Marjah Afghanistan offensive - When Marines rumble into the Taliban stronghold of Marjah in Helmand province for one of the largest offensives of the Afghanistan war, they'll be battle-testing a powerful new weapon, the Assault Breacher Vehicle", Christian Science Monitor
- ^ "US Marines push their ultimate mine clearance weapon, 'The Breacher,' against Taliban lines"[permanent dead link ], San Francisco Examiner
- ^ "MV-22 and ABV Meet Expectations", Military.com
- ^ ""Marine assault - Operation Cobra's Anger"
- ^ "Marines Blast Through Now Zad With Assault Breacher Vehicles" Archived February 18, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Monster mine-clearing tank goes to work in Afghanistan" Archived December 8, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Combat Camera: US Marines Take Now Zad During Operation Cobra's Anger, Part 1"
- ^ "United States Marines Corps deployed for the time in Afghanistan the new engineer armoured ABV Assault Breacher Vehicle"
- ^ "Taliban escape route sealed before attack"
- ^ "US and Afghan troops ring Taliban stronghold"[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "Marines test Taliban defenses before Afghan attack"
- ^ "Two U.S. Marine Assault Breacher Vehicles (ABV), test-fire explosive line charges in the desert outside Sistani"[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "Marine assault vehicles key to Afghan strategy – As U.S. and Afghan troops prepare for an offensive in Helmand province, the Assault Breacher Vehicle – a cross between a tank and a bulldozer – is intended to conquer the terrain and roadside bombs"
- ^ "Taliban leaders flee as marines hit stronghold"
- ^ "New Marine Tech Slams into Helmand"
- ^ MRAP No Good for Korea, 2ID Decides - Military.com, 16 August 2013
- ^ The ABV Assault Breacher Vehicle is deployed by U.S. Army in South Korea – Armyrecognition.com, 20 August 2013
- ^ Gonzales, Matt (2021-12-01). "Force Design 2030: Divesting to meet the future threat". United States Marine Corps Flagship. Retrieved 2023-08-11.
- ^ Keys, William; Richard, Ronald (6 March 2023). "Marine combat engineers no longer capable of supporting the infantry". Marine Corps Times. Retrieved 16 August 2023.
- ^ a b Kadib, Charbel (3 May 2021). "Defence procures $2.5bn in AFVs, CH-47F Chinooks". Defence Connect. Retrieved 3 May 2021.
- ^ "On the occasion of the Day of Missile Forces and Artillery and the Engineering Troops Day, Volodymyr Zelenskyy presents state awards to Ukraine's defenders". PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY Official website. 3 November 2023. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
- ^ "Ukraine's Troops Were Reinforced by the American M1150 Assault Breacher Vehicle | Defense Express". en.defence-ua.com. Retrieved 2023-11-04.
- ^ "Ukraine Has Only a Few American-Made Assault Breacher Vehicles. It Just Lost One Outside Avdiivka". 22 February 2024.
- ^ "Second Abrams tank & mine-clearing vehicle destroyed in Ukraine conflict – media". Conflict media. Retrieved 2024-03-04.
- ^ "Chapter Three: North America: Regional trends in 2022 16; United States: defence policy and economics 18; Canada: defence policy 28; Arms procurements and deliveries 29; Armed forces data section 32". The Military Balance. 123 (1): 16–49. 2023-12-31. doi:10.1080/04597222.2023.2162715. ISSN 0459-7222. S2CID 256848739.
- ^ Axe, David. "The United States Quietly Gave Ukraine the Assault Breacher, a Special Vehicle for Breaking Through Russian Defenses". Forbes. Retrieved 10 November 2023.
- ^ Nikolov, Boyko. "US mine-clearing vehicle M1150 falls into Russian possession".
- ^ Ratka, Damian (21 November 2023). "Assault Breacher Vehicles for the Polish Army". defence24.com. Retrieved 29 December 2023.
- ^ "Romania – M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks". Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 9 November 2023.
- ^ "BAHRAIN – M1A2 ABRAMS MAIN BATTLE TANKS". Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 19 March 2024.
External links
[edit]- Video from Deadliest Tech