Jump to content

I Accuse (1941 film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SporkBot (talk | contribs)
m Remove template per TFD outcome
 
(108 intermediate revisions by 66 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1941 film}}
'''''Ich klage an''''' (Eng: ''I Accuse'') is a 1941 German pro-[[euthanasia]] [[propaganda]] film directed by [[Wolfgang Liebeneiner]].<Ref>{{cite news |url=http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/142849/Ich-Klage-An/overview |title=New York Times: Ich Klage An (1941) |accessdate=2010-10-30|work=NY Times}}</ref>
{{use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}

{{infobox film
It was banned by Allied powers after the war.<ref>Cinzia Romani, ''Tainted Goddesses: Female Film Stars of the Third Reich'' p108 ISBN 0-9627613-1-1</reF>
| name = I Accuse
| image =
| caption =
| director = [[Wolfgang Liebeneiner]]
| based_on = {{based on|''Sendung und Gewissen''|Hellmuth Unger}}
| writer = Harald Bratt<br />[[Eberhard Frowein]]<br />Wolfgang Liebeneiner
| starring = {{plainlist|<!-- order per poster art: https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BOThkNDhmMmYtZjAzYS00MjY1LWIzYTYtN2M3ZDVkOWVjNmJmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDE5MTU2MDE@._V1_.jpg -->
* [[Heidemarie Hatheyer]]
* [[Paul Hartmann (actor)|Paul Hartmann]]
* [[Mathias Wieman]]
* [[Christian Kayßler]]
* [[Hans Nielsen (actor)|Hans Nielsen]]
* [[Harald Paulsen]]
* [[Charlotte Thiele]]
* [[Albert Florath]]
}}
| producer = [[Heinrich Jonen]]
| music = [[Norbert Schultze]]
| cinematography = [[Friedl Behn-Grund]]
| editing = [[Walter von Bonhorst]]
| studio = [[Tobis Filmkunst]]
| runtime = 125 min
| released = {{film date|1941|8|29|df=y}}
| country = [[Nazi Germany]]
| language = German
| budget = 960,000 ℛℳ
| gross = 5.4 million ℛℳ
}}
'''''I Accuse''''' ([[German language|German]]: ''Ich klage an'' ({{IPA|de|ˈʔɪç ˈklaːɡə ʔan|}}) is a 1941 [[Nazi German]] pro-[[euthanasia]] [[propaganda]] film directed by [[Wolfgang Liebeneiner]]<ref>{{cite news |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/142849/Ich-Klage-An/overview |title=The New York Times: Ich Klage An (1941) |access-date=2010-10-30|url-status=dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160309071126/http://www.nytimes.com/movies/movie/142849/Ich-Klage-An/overview |department=Movies & TV Dept. |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=2016 | archive-date = 2016-03-09}}</ref> and produced by [[Heinrich Jonen]] and [[Ewald von Demandowsky]]. It was developed to promote the involuntary euthanasia of disabled people conducted through the [[Aktion T4]] mass murder program and to garner public support for the Nazi concept of [[life unworthy of life]].


==Plot==
==Plot==
A woman suffering from multiple sclerosis pleads with doctors to kill her.<ref>[[Erwin Leiser]], ''Nazi Cinema'' p70 ISBN 0-02-570230-0</ref> Her husband gives her a fatal overdose, and is put on trial, where arguments are put forth that prolonging life is sometimes contrary to nature, and that death is a right as well as a duty.<ref>[[Erwin Leiser]], ''Nazi Cinema'' p70-1 ISBN 0-02-570230-0</ref> It culminates in the husband's declaration that he is accusing them of cruelty for trying to prevent such deaths.<ref>Robert Edwin Hertzstein, The War That Hitler Won p308 ISBN 399-11845-4</ref>
Hanna, a beautiful and talented young pianist, is diagnosed with late stage [[multiple sclerosis]]. Unable to pursue her career as a concert pianist, losing all her motor functions, and in constant agonizing pain, she begs her doctors to end her life.{{sfn|Leiser|page=70}} Hanna's husband Thomas, a successful doctor himself, reluctantly gives her a fatal overdose of barbiturates and is charged with murder. During an extended trial scene, arguments are put forth for and against euthanasia, heavily favoring the position that prolonging a disabled person’s life is sometimes contrary to nature, and that death is a patient's right as well as a doctor's moral duty.{{sfn|Leiser|pages=70–71}} In the closing scene, Thomas lashes out at the judge and prosecutor, telling them they have no right to condemn him when they weren't the ones forced to helplessly watch a loved one suffer in pain. He accuses the lawmakers of cruelty for failing to prevent patients' suffering through necessary euthanasia.{{sfn|Hertzstein|page=308}}


==Cast==
==Propaganda elements==
{{cast listing|
This film was commissioned by Goebbels at the suggestion of Karl Brandt to make the public more supportive of the Reich's T4 euthanasia program, and presented simultaneously with the practice of euthanasia in Nazi Germany.<ref>Pierre Aycoberry ''The Nazi Question'', p11 Pantheon Books New York 1981</ref> The actual victims of the Nazi euthanasia program [[Action T4]] were in fact killed without their consent, in the absence of their families.<ref>[[Erwin Leiser]], ''Nazi Cinema'' p69 ISBN 0-02-570230-0</ref> Indeed, one cinema goer compared it to the program and asked how abuses could be prevented from creeping in.<ref>[[Richard Grunberger]], ''The 12-Year Reich'', p 385, ISBN 03-076435-1</ref>
* [[Paul Hartmann (actor)|Paul Hartmann]] as Professor Thomas Heyt
* [[Heidemarie Hatheyer]] as Hanna Heyt
* [[Mathias Wieman]] as Bernhard Lang
* [[Margarete Haagen]] as Berta Link
* [[Charlotte Thiele]] as Barbara Burckhardt
* [[Christian Kayßler]] as Judge Kriebelmeyer
* [[Harald Paulsen]] as Eduard Stretter
* [[Albert Florath]] as Prof. Schlüter
* [[Ilse Fürstenberg]] as Marie Günther
* [[Karin Evans]] as Erna Balg
* [[Hans Nielsen (actor)|Hans Nielsen]] as Dr. Höfer
* [[Franz Schafheitlin]] as Straten
* [[Erich Ponto]] as Prof. Werther
* [[Otto Graf]] as Prosecutor Engel
* [[Leopold von Ledebur]] as Magistrate Knevels
* [[Hansi Arnstaedt]] as Mrs Klapper
* Just Scheu as Doctor Scheu
* [[Paul Rehkopf]] as Court Officer
* Karl Haubenreißer as Schönbrunn
}}


==Production==
SS reported that the churches were uniformly negative on the movie, with Catholics expressing it more strongly but Protestants being equally negative.<ref>[[Erwin Leiser]], ''Nazi Cinema'' p146-7 ISBN 0-02-570230-0</ref> Opinion in medical circles was rather positive, though bringing up cases where patients thought to be incurable had recovered.<ref>[[Erwin Leiser]], ''Nazi Cinema'' p147 ISBN 0-02-570230-0</ref> Legal professions were anxious that it be placed on legal ground, and the general population was supportive.<ref>[[Erwin Leiser]], ''Nazi Cinema'' p148 ISBN 0-02-570230-0</ref>
Prior propaganda short films, such as ''Abseit vom Wege'' (''By the Wayside'') and ''Erbkrank'' (''Congenitally Ill''), were made in support of the Nazi's euthanasia policies, but were meant for ideological education and not for public release.{{sfn|Welch|1983|pp=100}} [[Victor Brack]] convinced [[Tobis Filmkunst]] to produce a film about euthanasia after a public backlash to the policies. [[Wolfgang Liebeneiner]], who directed the film, stated that it was meant to test public opinion on legalizing euthanasia.{{sfn|Welch|1983|pp=102-103}} It cost 960,000 ℛℳ ({{Inflation|DE|960,000|1941|fmt=eq}}).{{sfn|Welch|1983|pp=269}}


This film was commissioned by Nazi propaganda minister [[Joseph Goebbels]] at the suggestion of Dr. [[Karl Brandt]], to bolster public support for the [[Aktion T4]] euthanasia program.{{sfn|Ayçoberry|page=11}} Key scenes from the film were personally inserted by Brack, one of the prominent organisers of the program and later a convicted war criminal. The actual victims of T4 were in fact killed without their consent, or that of their families.{{sfn|Leiser|page=69}} Indeed, one cinema goer is alleged to have compared the film to the program and naively asked how abuses could be prevented from creeping into it.{{sfn|Grunberger|page=385}}
==2013 Controversy==
In 2013 film reviewers noticed similarity to the film in the award-winning 2012 movie [[Amour (2012 film)|Amour]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patheos.com/blogs/churchofthemasses/2013/02/oscar-nominated-amour-is-based-on-a-nazi-film/|title=''Oscar Nominated Amour is based on a Nazi Film?'' |last=Nicolosi |first=Barbara |date=2013-02-02|publisher=''patheos''|accessdate=21 February 2013}}</ref>


[[Heidemarie Hatheyer]] was banned from acting by the Allied occupation, but she resumed her career in 1949 and won numerous high-profile awards before her death. Liebeneiner was put on trial in 1964 as an accessory to mass murder for directing the film.{{sfn|Waldman|2008|p=278}}
In both films the wives have very similar names, music careers and serious illnesses. They both beg their husbands for death. In both films the husbands eventually agree and, in both films, the first judgment of "society" is that the act is murder. But, in both cases, the audience is led to the conclusion that allowing the wife to live would have been the greater crime.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lifesitenews.com/blog/amour-an-award-winning-film-with-an-anti-life-sting-in-the-tail?fb_action_ids=10151408494588560&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map={%2210151408494588560%22%3A180023475473398}&action_type_map={%2210151408494588560%22%3A%22og.likes%22}&action_ref_map=%5B%5D/|title=''Amour – an award winning film with an anti-life sting in the tail'' |last=Saunders |first=Peter |date=2012-12-11|publisher=''LifeSiteNews''|accessdate=21 February 2013}}</ref>

==Reception==
The film was approved by censors without any edits on 15 August 1941, and premiered in Berlin on 29 August.{{sfn|Welch|1983|pp=102-103}} Over 18 million people watched the film{{sfn|Welch|1983|pp=107}} and it earned 5.4 million ℛℳ ({{Inflation|DE|5,400,000|1941|fmt=eq}}) for a profit of 3,641,000 ℛℳ ({{Inflation|DE|3,641,000|1941|fmt=eq}}).{{sfn|Welch|1983|pp=269}} It was banned by Allied powers after the war.{{sfn|Romani|page=108}}

The SS reported that the churches were uniformly negative about the movie, with Catholics expressing it more strongly but Protestants being equally negative.{{sfn|Leiser|pages=146–147}} Opinions in medical circles were positive, though there were doubts, especially though not exclusively in cases where patients thought to be incurable had recovered.{{sfn|Leiser|page=147}} Legal professions were anxious that it be placed on a legal footing, and in the few polls that were commissioned, the general population were said to be supportive.{{sfn|Leiser|page=148}}


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist}}


==Works cited==
*{{cite book|last=Waldman |first=Harry |title=Nazi Films In America, 1933-1942 |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |year=2008 |isbn=9780786438617}}
*{{cite book|last=Welch |first=David |author-link=David Welch (historian) |title=Propaganda and the German Cinema: 1933-1945 |publisher=[[I.B. Tauris]] |year=1983 |isbn=9781860645204}}

==Bibliography==
* {{cite book | ref = {{sfnref|Ayçoberry}} | first = Pierre | last = Ayçoberry | title = The Nazi Question: An Essay on the Interpretations of National Socialism (1922–1975) | publisher = Pantheon Books | location = New York | year = 1981 | isbn = 978-0-394-74841-2 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/naziquestionessa0000ayco }}
* {{cite book | ref = {{sfnref|Grunberger}} | author-link = Richard Grunberger | first = Richard | last = Grunberger | title = The 12-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany, 1933–1945 | publisher = Holt, Rinehart and Winston | year = 1971 | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-03-076435-6 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/12yearreichsoc00grun }}
* {{cite book | ref = {{sfnref|Hertzstein}} | first = Robert Edwin | last = Hertzstein | title = The War That Hitler Won | year = 1978 | publisher = Putnam | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-399-11845-6 }}
* {{cite book | ref = {{sfnref|Leiser}} | author-link = Erwin Leiser | last = Leiser | first = Erwin | title = Nazi Cinema | publisher = Macmillan | year = 1975 | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-02-570230-1 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/nazicinema0000leis }}
* {{cite book | ref = {{sfnref|Romani}} | first = Cinzia | last = Romani | title = Tainted Goddesses: Female Film Stars of the Third Reich | publisher = Sarpedon | year = 1992 | location = New York | isbn = 978-0-9627613-1-7 }}

==External links==
* {{IMDb title|0033750}}
* [https://archive.org/details/forbiddenfilmnr18of36ichklagean1941 Full film at Archive.org]

{{Wolfgang Liebeneiner}}


[[Category:1941 films]]
[[Category:1941 films]]
[[Category:Aktion T4]]
[[Category:Nazi propaganda films]]
[[Category:Nazi propaganda films]]
[[Category:Films of Nazi Germany]]
[[Category:Films of Nazi Germany]]
[[Category:Euthanasia]]
[[Category:Films about euthanasia]]
[[Category:1940s German-language films]]
[[Category:Censored films]]
[[Category:German black-and-white films]]
[[Category:German drama films]]
[[Category:1941 drama films]]
[[Category:Films about multiple sclerosis]]
[[Category:German courtroom films]]
[[Category:1940s German films]]
[[Category:Films scored by Norbert Schultze]]
[[Category:Nazi-era films restricted in Germany]]


{{1940s-Germany-film-stub}}
{{Holocaust-stub}}


{{1940s-Germany-film-stub}}
[[cs:Ich klage an (film)]]
[[de:Ich klage an (1941)]]
[[it:Io accuso]]
[[he:אני מאשים (סרט תעמולה נאצי)]]

Latest revision as of 23:33, 21 December 2024

I Accuse
Directed byWolfgang Liebeneiner
Written byHarald Bratt
Eberhard Frowein
Wolfgang Liebeneiner
Based onSendung und Gewissen
by Hellmuth Unger
Produced byHeinrich Jonen
Starring
CinematographyFriedl Behn-Grund
Edited byWalter von Bonhorst
Music byNorbert Schultze
Production
company
Release date
  • 29 August 1941 (1941-08-29)
Running time
125 min
CountryNazi Germany
LanguageGerman
Budget960,000 ℛℳ
Box office5.4 million ℛℳ

I Accuse (German: Ich klage an ([ˈʔɪç ˈklaːɡə ʔan]) is a 1941 Nazi German pro-euthanasia propaganda film directed by Wolfgang Liebeneiner[1] and produced by Heinrich Jonen and Ewald von Demandowsky. It was developed to promote the involuntary euthanasia of disabled people conducted through the Aktion T4 mass murder program and to garner public support for the Nazi concept of life unworthy of life.

Plot

[edit]

Hanna, a beautiful and talented young pianist, is diagnosed with late stage multiple sclerosis. Unable to pursue her career as a concert pianist, losing all her motor functions, and in constant agonizing pain, she begs her doctors to end her life.[2] Hanna's husband Thomas, a successful doctor himself, reluctantly gives her a fatal overdose of barbiturates and is charged with murder. During an extended trial scene, arguments are put forth for and against euthanasia, heavily favoring the position that prolonging a disabled person’s life is sometimes contrary to nature, and that death is a patient's right as well as a doctor's moral duty.[3] In the closing scene, Thomas lashes out at the judge and prosecutor, telling them they have no right to condemn him when they weren't the ones forced to helplessly watch a loved one suffer in pain. He accuses the lawmakers of cruelty for failing to prevent patients' suffering through necessary euthanasia.[4]

Cast

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Prior propaganda short films, such as Abseit vom Wege (By the Wayside) and Erbkrank (Congenitally Ill), were made in support of the Nazi's euthanasia policies, but were meant for ideological education and not for public release.[5] Victor Brack convinced Tobis Filmkunst to produce a film about euthanasia after a public backlash to the policies. Wolfgang Liebeneiner, who directed the film, stated that it was meant to test public opinion on legalizing euthanasia.[6] It cost 960,000 ℛℳ (equivalent to $4,121,339 in 2021).[7]

This film was commissioned by Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels at the suggestion of Dr. Karl Brandt, to bolster public support for the Aktion T4 euthanasia program.[8] Key scenes from the film were personally inserted by Brack, one of the prominent organisers of the program and later a convicted war criminal. The actual victims of T4 were in fact killed without their consent, or that of their families.[9] Indeed, one cinema goer is alleged to have compared the film to the program and naively asked how abuses could be prevented from creeping into it.[10]

Heidemarie Hatheyer was banned from acting by the Allied occupation, but she resumed her career in 1949 and won numerous high-profile awards before her death. Liebeneiner was put on trial in 1964 as an accessory to mass murder for directing the film.[11]

Reception

[edit]

The film was approved by censors without any edits on 15 August 1941, and premiered in Berlin on 29 August.[6] Over 18 million people watched the film[12] and it earned 5.4 million ℛℳ (equivalent to $23,182,532 in 2021) for a profit of 3,641,000 ℛℳ (equivalent to $15,631,037 in 2021).[7] It was banned by Allied powers after the war.[13]

The SS reported that the churches were uniformly negative about the movie, with Catholics expressing it more strongly but Protestants being equally negative.[14] Opinions in medical circles were positive, though there were doubts, especially though not exclusively in cases where patients thought to be incurable had recovered.[15] Legal professions were anxious that it be placed on a legal footing, and in the few polls that were commissioned, the general population were said to be supportive.[16]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "The New York Times: Ich Klage An (1941)". Movies & TV Dept. The New York Times. 2016. Archived from the original on 9 March 2016. Retrieved 30 October 2010.
  2. ^ Leiser, p. 70.
  3. ^ Leiser, pp. 70–71.
  4. ^ Hertzstein, p. 308.
  5. ^ Welch 1983, pp. 100.
  6. ^ a b Welch 1983, pp. 102–103.
  7. ^ a b Welch 1983, pp. 269.
  8. ^ Ayçoberry, p. 11.
  9. ^ Leiser, p. 69.
  10. ^ Grunberger, p. 385.
  11. ^ Waldman 2008, p. 278.
  12. ^ Welch 1983, pp. 107.
  13. ^ Romani, p. 108.
  14. ^ Leiser, pp. 146–147.
  15. ^ Leiser, p. 147.
  16. ^ Leiser, p. 148.

Works cited

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]