Jump to content

Zombie (computing): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 80.208.165.84 to version by Vaticidalprophet. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3988664) (Bot)
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #20
 
(32 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Network connected computer that has been compromised and is used for malicious task without the owner being aware of it}}
{{Short description|Compromised computer used for malicious tasks on a network}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2017}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2017}}
{{About|the term "zombie" in computer security|"zombie" in UNIX programming|Zombie process}}
{{About|the term "zombie" in computer security|"zombie" in UNIX programming|Zombie process}}


In [[computing]], a '''zombie''' is a computer connected to the Internet that has been [[computer security|compromised]] by a [[Hacker (computer security)|hacker]], [[computer virus]], [[computer worm]], or [[Trojan horse (computing)|trojan horse]] program and can be used to perform malicious tasks of one sort or another under remote direction. [[Botnet]]s of zombie computers are often used to spread [[e-mail spam]] and launch [[denial-of-service attack]]s (DoS attacks). Most owners of "zombie" computers are unaware that their system is being used in this way. Because the owner tends to be unaware, these computers are metaphorically compared to fictional [[zombie]]s. A coordinated [[DDoS attack]] by multiple botnet machines also resembles a "zombie horde attack", as depicted in fictional [[zombie film]]s.
In [[computing]], a '''zombie''' is a computer connected to the Internet that has been [[computer security|compromised]] by a [[Hacker (computer security)|hacker]] via a [[computer virus]], [[computer worm]], or [[Trojan horse (computing)|trojan horse]] program and can be used to perform malicious tasks under the remote direction of the hacker. Zombie computers often coordinate together in a [[botnet]] controlled by the hacker, and are used for activities such as spreading [[e-mail spam]] and launching [[distributed denial-of-service attack]]s (DDoS attacks) against web servers. Most victims are unaware that their computers have become zombies. The concept is similar to the [[zombie]] of [[Haitian Voodoo]] folklore, which refers to a corpse resurrected by a [[Sorcerer (supernatural)|sorcerer]] via magic and enslaved to the sorcerer's commands, having no free will of its own.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ccexpert.us/port-security/zombie.html|title = Zombie - Port Security|date = August 3, 2021}}</ref> A coordinated [[DDoS attack]] by multiple botnet machines also resembles a "zombie horde attack", as depicted in fictional [[zombie film]]s.


[[File:Circle of spam.svg|300px|right|thumb|(1)&nbsp;Spammer's web site (2)&nbsp;Spammer (3)&nbsp;Spamware (4)&nbsp;Infected computers (5)&nbsp;Virus or trojan (6)&nbsp;Mail servers (7)&nbsp;Users (8)&nbsp;Web traffic]]
[[File:Circle of spam.svg|300px|right|thumb|(1)&nbsp;Spammer's web site (2)&nbsp;Spammer (3)&nbsp;Spamware (4)&nbsp;Infected computers (5)&nbsp;Virus or trojan (6)&nbsp;Mail servers (7)&nbsp;Users (8)&nbsp;Web traffic]]
Line 9: Line 9:
==Advertising==
==Advertising==


Zombie computers have been used extensively to send e-mail spam; as of 2005, an estimated 50&ndash;80% of all spam worldwide was sent by zombie computers.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Tom Spring |date=June 20, 2005 |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/121381/article.html |title=Spam Slayer: Slaying Spam-Spewing Zombie PCs |publisher=PC World |access-date=December 19, 2015|archive-date=July 16, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170716042122/http://www.pcworld.com/article/121381/article.html|url-status=live}}</ref> This allows [[spammer]]s to avoid detection and presumably reduces their [[Bandwidth (computing)|bandwidth]] costs, since the owners of zombies pay for their own bandwidth. This spam also greatly increases the spread of Trojan horses, as Trojans are not self-replicating. They rely on the movement of e-mails or spam to grow, whereas worms can spread by other means.<ref>{{cite book|title=Managing Information in the Public Sector|page=221|first=Jay D.|last=White|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|year=2007|isbn=978-0-7656-1748-4}}</ref> For similar reasons, zombies are also used to commit [[click fraud]] against sites displaying [[pay-per-click]] advertising. Others can host [[phishing]] or [[money mule]] recruiting websites.
Zombie computers have been used extensively to send [[Email spam|e-mail spam]]; as of 2005, an estimated 50&ndash;80% of all spam worldwide was sent by zombie computers.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Tom Spring |date=June 20, 2005 |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/121381/article.html |title=Spam Slayer: Slaying Spam-Spewing Zombie PCs |publisher=PC World |access-date=December 19, 2015|archive-date=July 16, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170716042122/http://www.pcworld.com/article/121381/article.html|url-status=live}}</ref> This allows [[spammer]]s to avoid detection and presumably reduces their [[Bandwidth (computing)|bandwidth]] costs, since the owners of zombies pay for their own bandwidth. This spam also greatly increases the spread of [[Trojan horse (computing)|Trojan horses]], as Trojans are not self-replicating. They rely on the movement of e-mails or spam to grow, whereas worms can spread by other means.<ref>{{cite book|title=Managing Information in the Public Sector|page=221|first=Jay D.|last=White|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|year=2007|isbn=978-0-7656-1748-4}}</ref> For similar reasons, zombies are also used to commit [[click fraud]] against sites displaying [[pay-per-click]] advertising. Others can host [[phishing]] or [[money mule]] recruiting websites.


== Distributed denial-of-service attacks ==
== Distributed denial-of-service attacks ==
Zombies can be used to conduct [[distributed denial-of-service]] (DDoS) attacks, a term which refers to the orchestrated flooding of target websites by large numbers of computers at once. The large number of Internet users making simultaneous requests of a website's server is intended to result in crashing and the prevention of legitimate users from accessing the site.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Truth about Avoiding Scams|page=[https://archive.org/details/truthaboutavoidi0000weis/page/201 201]|first=Steve|last=Weisman|publisher=FT Press|year=2008|isbn=978-0-13-233385-6|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/truthaboutavoidi0000weis/page/201}}</ref> A variant of this type of flooding is known as distributed degradation-of-service. Committed by "pulsing" zombies, distributed degradation-of-service is the moderated and periodical flooding of websites intended to slow down rather than crash a victim site. The effectiveness of this tactic springs from the fact that intense flooding can be quickly detected and remedied, but pulsing zombie attacks and the resulting slow-down in website access can go unnoticed for months and even years.<ref>{{cite book|title=Internet and the Law|year=2006|page=325|first=Aaron|last=Schwabach|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-85109-731-7}}</ref>
Zombies can be used to conduct [[distributed denial-of-service]] (DDoS) attacks, a term which refers to the orchestrated flooding of target websites by large numbers of computers at once. The large number of Internet users making simultaneous requests of a website's server is intended to result in crashing and the prevention of legitimate users from accessing the site.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Truth about Avoiding Scams|page=[https://archive.org/details/truthaboutavoidi0000weis/page/201 201]|first=Steve|last=Weisman|publisher=FT Press|year=2008|isbn=978-0-13-233385-6|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/truthaboutavoidi0000weis/page/201}}</ref> A variant of this type of flooding is known as distributed degradation-of-service. Committed by "pulsing" zombies, distributed degradation-of-service is the moderated and periodical flooding of websites intended to slow down rather than crash a victim site. The effectiveness of this tactic springs from the fact that intense flooding can be quickly detected and remedied, but pulsing zombie attacks and the resulting slow-down in website access can go unnoticed for months and even years.<ref>{{cite book|title=Internet and the Law|year=2006|page=325|first=Aaron|last=Schwabach|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=1-85109-731-7}}</ref>


The computing facilitated by [[Internet of things|Internet of Things]] (IoT) has been productive for modern day usage but it has played a significant role in the increase in such web attacks. The potential of IoT enables every device to communicate efficiently but this increases the need of policy enforcement regarding the security threats. Through these devices, the most prominent attacking behaviors is the DDoS. Research has been conducted to study the impact of such attacks on IoT networks and their compensating provisions for defense.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lohachab|first1=Ankur|last2=Karambir|first2=Bidhan|date=2018-09-01|title=Critical Analysis of DDoS—An Emerging Security Threat over IoT Networks|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s41650-018-0022-5|journal=Journal of Communications and Information Networks|language=en|volume=3|issue=3|pages=57–78|doi=10.1007/s41650-018-0022-5|s2cid=52924506|issn=2509-3312}}</ref>
The computing facilitated by the [[Internet of things|Internet of Things]] (IoT) has been productive for modern-day usage, yet it has played a significant role in the increase in web attacks. The potential of IoT enables every device to communicate efficiently, but this also intensifies the need for policy enforcement regarding security threats. Among these threats, Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks are prevalent. Research has been conducted to study the impact of such attacks on IoT networks and to develop compensating provisions for defense.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lohachab|first1=Ankur|last2=Karambir|first2=Bidhan|date=2018-09-01|title=Critical Analysis of DDoS—An Emerging Security Threat over IoT Networks|url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s41650-018-0022-5|journal=Journal of Communications and Information Networks|language=en|volume=3|issue=3|pages=57–78|doi=10.1007/s41650-018-0022-5|s2cid=52924506|issn=2509-3312}}</ref> Consultation services specialized in IoT security, such as those offered by [https://gravitechdreams.com/service/iot-consulting/ IoT consulting firms]{{dead link|date=December 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}, play a vital role in devising comprehensive strategies to safeguard IoT ecosystems from cyber threats.


Notable incidents of distributed denial- and degradation-of-service attacks in the past include the attack upon the [[Spam Prevention Early Warning System|SPEWS]] service in 2003, and the one against [[Blue Frog]] service in 2006. In 2000, several prominent Web sites ([[Yahoo]], [[eBay]], etc.) were clogged to a standstill by a distributed denial of service attack mounted by [[MafiaBoy]], a Canadian teenager.
Notable incidents of distributed denial- and degradation-of-service attacks in the past include the attack upon the [[Spam Prevention Early Warning System|SPEWS]] service in 2003, and the one against [[Blue Frog]] service in 2006. In 2000, several prominent Web sites ([[Yahoo]], [[eBay]], etc.) were clogged to a standstill by a distributed denial of service attack mounted by '[[MafiaBoy]]', a Canadian teenager.


== Smartphones ==
== Smartphones ==
Line 36: Line 36:
==External links==
==External links==
{{external links|date=May 2017}}
{{external links|date=May 2017}}
<!-- DEAD LINK: *[http://www.hackillusion.com/2011/02/what-is-zombie-and-how-to-prevent-from.html What is zombie and how to prevent from zombie] -->
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20061230152432/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2144375/botnet-operation-ruled-million Botnet operation controlled 1.5 million PCs]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20061230152432/http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2144375/botnet-operation-ruled-million Botnet operation controlled 1.5 million PCs]
*[http://antivirus.about.com/od/whatisavirus/a/zombiepc.htm Is Your PC a Zombie? on About.com]
*[http://antivirus.about.com/od/whatisavirus/a/zombiepc.htm Is Your PC a Zombie? on About.com] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110724184532/http://antivirus.about.com/od/whatisavirus/a/zombiepc.htm |date=July 24, 2011 }}
*[http://tweezersedge.com/archives/2005/02/000534.html A detailed account of what a zombie machine looks like and what it takes to "fix" it] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427120006/http://tweezersedge.com/archives/2005/02/000534.html |date=April 27, 2006 }}
*[http://lowkeysoft.com/proxy/ Intrusive analysis of a web-based proxy zombie network]

*[http://tweezersedge.com/archives/2005/02/000534.html A detailed account of what a zombie machine looks like and what it takes to "fix" it]
{{Information security}}
*[http://radsoft.net/news/roundups/grc/wkd/ Correspondence between Steve Gibson and Wicked]
*[http://johnbokma.com/mexit/2006/01/16/zombie-comment-spam-referer-spam.html Zombie networks, comment spam, and referer [sic&#93; spam]
*[http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/14/phone-hacking-threat-is-low-but-it-exists/ The New York Times: Phone Hacking Threat is Low, But It Exists]
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqB-0sI8e-4 Hackers Target Cell Phones, WPLG-TV/ABC-10 Miami]
*[https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/07/blackberry-spyware/ Researcher: BlackBerry Spyware Wasn’t Ready for Prime Time]
*[https://www.forbes.com/2009/07/28/hackers-iphone-apple-technology-security-hackers.html Forbes: How to Hijack Every iPhone in the World]
*[https://www.pcworld.com/article/173089/hackers_plan_to_clobber_the_cloud_spy_on_blackberries.html Hackers Plan to Clobber the Cloud, Spy on Blackberries]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20091024033302/http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/07/16/smobile-systems-release-solution-for-etisalat-blackberry-spyware/ SMobile Systems release solution for Etisalat BlackBerry spyware]
* [https://sourceforge.net/projects/loic-irc-0/ LOIC IRC-0 - An Open-Source IRC Botnet for Network Stress Testing]
* [https://sourceforge.net/projects/loic-slow-irc/ An Open-Source IRC and Webpage Botnet for Network Stress Testing]
{{Malware}}
{{Malware}}

[[Category:Computer network security]]
[[Category:Computer network security]]
[[Category:Denial-of-service attacks]]
[[Category:Denial-of-service attacks]]

Latest revision as of 03:21, 22 December 2024

In computing, a zombie is a computer connected to the Internet that has been compromised by a hacker via a computer virus, computer worm, or trojan horse program and can be used to perform malicious tasks under the remote direction of the hacker. Zombie computers often coordinate together in a botnet controlled by the hacker, and are used for activities such as spreading e-mail spam and launching distributed denial-of-service attacks (DDoS attacks) against web servers. Most victims are unaware that their computers have become zombies. The concept is similar to the zombie of Haitian Voodoo folklore, which refers to a corpse resurrected by a sorcerer via magic and enslaved to the sorcerer's commands, having no free will of its own.[1] A coordinated DDoS attack by multiple botnet machines also resembles a "zombie horde attack", as depicted in fictional zombie films.

(1) Spammer's web site (2) Spammer (3) Spamware (4) Infected computers (5) Virus or trojan (6) Mail servers (7) Users (8) Web traffic

Advertising

[edit]

Zombie computers have been used extensively to send e-mail spam; as of 2005, an estimated 50–80% of all spam worldwide was sent by zombie computers.[2] This allows spammers to avoid detection and presumably reduces their bandwidth costs, since the owners of zombies pay for their own bandwidth. This spam also greatly increases the spread of Trojan horses, as Trojans are not self-replicating. They rely on the movement of e-mails or spam to grow, whereas worms can spread by other means.[3] For similar reasons, zombies are also used to commit click fraud against sites displaying pay-per-click advertising. Others can host phishing or money mule recruiting websites.

Distributed denial-of-service attacks

[edit]

Zombies can be used to conduct distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, a term which refers to the orchestrated flooding of target websites by large numbers of computers at once. The large number of Internet users making simultaneous requests of a website's server is intended to result in crashing and the prevention of legitimate users from accessing the site.[4] A variant of this type of flooding is known as distributed degradation-of-service. Committed by "pulsing" zombies, distributed degradation-of-service is the moderated and periodical flooding of websites intended to slow down rather than crash a victim site. The effectiveness of this tactic springs from the fact that intense flooding can be quickly detected and remedied, but pulsing zombie attacks and the resulting slow-down in website access can go unnoticed for months and even years.[5]

The computing facilitated by the Internet of Things (IoT) has been productive for modern-day usage, yet it has played a significant role in the increase in web attacks. The potential of IoT enables every device to communicate efficiently, but this also intensifies the need for policy enforcement regarding security threats. Among these threats, Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks are prevalent. Research has been conducted to study the impact of such attacks on IoT networks and to develop compensating provisions for defense.[6] Consultation services specialized in IoT security, such as those offered by IoT consulting firms[dead link], play a vital role in devising comprehensive strategies to safeguard IoT ecosystems from cyber threats.

Notable incidents of distributed denial- and degradation-of-service attacks in the past include the attack upon the SPEWS service in 2003, and the one against Blue Frog service in 2006. In 2000, several prominent Web sites (Yahoo, eBay, etc.) were clogged to a standstill by a distributed denial of service attack mounted by 'MafiaBoy', a Canadian teenager.

Smartphones

[edit]

Beginning in July 2009, similar botnet capabilities have also emerged for the growing smartphone market. Examples include the July 2009 in the "wild" release of the Sexy Space text message worm, the world's first botnet capable SMS worm, which targeted the Symbian operating system in Nokia smartphones. Later that month, researcher Charlie Miller revealed a proof of concept text message worm for the iPhone at Black Hat Briefings. Also in July, United Arab Emirates consumers were targeted by the Etisalat BlackBerry spyware program. In the 2010s, the security community is divided as to the real world potential of mobile botnets. But in an August 2009 interview with The New York Times, cyber security consultant Michael Gregg summarized the issue this way: "We are about at the point with [smart]phones that we were with desktops in the '80s."[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Zombie - Port Security". August 3, 2021.
  2. ^ Tom Spring (June 20, 2005). "Spam Slayer: Slaying Spam-Spewing Zombie PCs". PC World. Archived from the original on July 16, 2017. Retrieved December 19, 2015.
  3. ^ White, Jay D. (2007). Managing Information in the Public Sector. M.E. Sharpe. p. 221. ISBN 978-0-7656-1748-4.
  4. ^ Weisman, Steve (2008). The Truth about Avoiding Scams. FT Press. p. 201. ISBN 978-0-13-233385-6.
  5. ^ Schwabach, Aaron (2006). Internet and the Law. ABC-CLIO. p. 325. ISBN 1-85109-731-7.
  6. ^ Lohachab, Ankur; Karambir, Bidhan (September 1, 2018). "Critical Analysis of DDoS—An Emerging Security Threat over IoT Networks". Journal of Communications and Information Networks. 3 (3): 57–78. doi:10.1007/s41650-018-0022-5. ISSN 2509-3312. S2CID 52924506.
  7. ^ Furchgott, Roy (August 14, 2009). "Phone Hacking Threat Is Low, but it Exists". Gadgetwise Blog. New York Times. Archived from the original on July 16, 2017. Retrieved July 16, 2017.
[edit]