Jump to content

The Hudsucker Proxy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} {{Dead link}}
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
| director = [[Coen brothers|Joel Coen]]<!--- Do NOT add Ethan. He's uncredited, and uncredited people aren't included in the infobox --->
| director = [[Coen brothers|Joel Coen]]<!--- Do NOT add Ethan. He's uncredited, and uncredited people aren't included in the infobox --->
| writer = {{Plainlist|
| writer = {{Plainlist|
* [[Coen brothers|Ethan Coen]]
* Ethan Coen
* Joel Coen
* Joel Coen
* [[Sam Raimi]]
* [[Sam Raimi]]
Line 29: Line 29:
* [[Warner Bros. Pictures|Warner Bros.]] (United States)
* [[Warner Bros. Pictures|Warner Bros.]] (United States)
* [[Rank Film Distributors]] (United Kingdom)<ref>{{cite web|title=The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)|work=[[BBFC]]|access-date=2 May 2021|url=https://www.bbfc.co.uk/release/the-hudsucker-proxy-q29sbgvjdglvbjpwwc0zmta2mtm}}</ref>
* [[Rank Film Distributors]] (United Kingdom)<ref>{{cite web|title=The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)|work=[[BBFC]]|access-date=2 May 2021|url=https://www.bbfc.co.uk/release/the-hudsucker-proxy-q29sbgvjdglvbjpwwc0zmta2mtm}}</ref>
* Manifesto Film Sales (International)
}}
}}
| released = {{Film date|1994|1|27|[[Sundance Film Festival|Sundance]]}}<!--- per [[WP:FILMRELEASE]] --->
| released = {{Film date|1994|1|27|[[Sundance Film Festival|Sundance]]|1994|03|11|United States|1994|09|02|United Kingdom}}<!--- per [[WP:FILMRELEASE]] --->
| runtime = 111 minutes
| runtime = 111 minutes
| country = {{Plainlist|
| country = {{Plainlist|
Line 45: Line 46:
The script was finished in 1985, but production did not start until 1991, when [[Joel Silver]] acquired the script for [[Silver Pictures]]. [[Warner Bros.]] subsequently agreed to distribute the film, with further financing from [[PolyGram Filmed Entertainment]] and [[Working Title Films]]. Filming at Carolco Studios in [[Wilmington, North Carolina|Wilmington]], [[North Carolina]], lasted from November 1992 to March 1993. The New York City [[scale model]] set was designed by [[Michael J. McAlister]] and [[Mark Stetson]], with further effects provided by [[Framestore|The Computer Film Company]].
The script was finished in 1985, but production did not start until 1991, when [[Joel Silver]] acquired the script for [[Silver Pictures]]. [[Warner Bros.]] subsequently agreed to distribute the film, with further financing from [[PolyGram Filmed Entertainment]] and [[Working Title Films]]. Filming at Carolco Studios in [[Wilmington, North Carolina|Wilmington]], [[North Carolina]], lasted from November 1992 to March 1993. The New York City [[scale model]] set was designed by [[Michael J. McAlister]] and [[Mark Stetson]], with further effects provided by [[Framestore|The Computer Film Company]].


Upon its release in March 1994, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' received mixed reviews from critics and [[Box office bomb|bombed at the box office]], but has since gained a [[cult following]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2024}}
Upon its release in March 1994, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' received mixed reviews from critics and [[Box office bomb|bombed at the box office]], but has since gained a [[cult following]].<ref>https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2024/3/1/the-coen-brothers-transcendently-nasty-1994-cult-classic-the-hudsucker-proxy-is-a-movie-to-get-lost-in</ref>


==Plot==
==Plot==
Line 52: Line 53:
Afterward, Sidney J. Mussburger, a ruthless member of the company's [[board of directors]], knowing that Hudsucker Industries' [[bylaws]] call for Hudsucker's stock shares to be sold to the public, suggests a scheme to buy the controlling interest in the company by temporarily depressing the stock price by hiring a clearly incompetent president to run the business.
Afterward, Sidney J. Mussburger, a ruthless member of the company's [[board of directors]], knowing that Hudsucker Industries' [[bylaws]] call for Hudsucker's stock shares to be sold to the public, suggests a scheme to buy the controlling interest in the company by temporarily depressing the stock price by hiring a clearly incompetent president to run the business.


In the mailroom, Norville is assigned to deliver a "Blue Letter" to Mussburger. The letter is a top-secret communication from Hudsucker, sent shortly before his death. However, Norville does not deliver the letter; instead, he [[Sales presentation|pitches]] Mussburger an invention of his (indicated with no other explanation than a simple drawing of a circle and his cryptic explanation, "you know: for kids."). Believing Norville to be an idiot, Mussburger selects him as a [[Agent (law)|proxy]] for Hudsucker.
In the mailroom, Norville is assigned to deliver a "Blue Letter" to Mussburger. The letter is a top-secret communication from Hudsucker, sent shortly before his death. However, Norville does not deliver the letter; instead, he [[Sales presentation|pitches]] Mussburger an invention of his (indicated with no other explanation than a simple drawing of a circle and his cryptic explanation, "you know: for kids"). Believing Norville to be an idiot, Mussburger selects him as a [[Agent (law)|proxy]] for Hudsucker.


Across town, Amy Archer, a brassy [[Pulitzer Prize]]–winning reporter for the ''Manhattan Argus'' newspaper, is assigned to write a story about Norville and find out what kind of man he really is. She obtains a job at Hudsucker Industries as his [[personal secretary]], pretending to be yet another desperate graduate from his [[alma mater]] in Muncie.
Across town, Amy Archer, a brassy [[Pulitzer Prize]]–winning reporter for the ''Manhattan Argus'' newspaper, is assigned to write a story about Norville and find out what kind of man he really is. She obtains a job at Hudsucker Industries as his [[personal secretary]], pretending to be yet another desperate graduate from his [[alma mater]] in Muncie.
Line 88: Line 89:
* [[Peter Gallagher]] as Vic Tenetta
* [[Peter Gallagher]] as Vic Tenetta
* [[Mike Starr (actor)|Mike Starr]] as Newsroom Reporter
* [[Mike Starr (actor)|Mike Starr]] as Newsroom Reporter
* [[John Goodman]] as Rockwell newsreel announcer
* [[John Goodman]] (credited as [[Barton Fink|Karl Mundt]]) as Rockwell newsreel announcer
* [[I.M. Hobson]] as Myron Addison, the weeping board member
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}


Line 95: Line 95:


===Writing===
===Writing===
The [[Coen brothers]] first met [[Sam Raimi]] when Joel Coen worked as an assistant editor on Raimi's ''[[The Evil Dead]]'' (1981). Together, they began writing the script for ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' in 1981,<ref>Muir, p. 77</ref> and continued during the filming of ''[[Crimewave]]'' (1985),<ref>Warren, pp. 101–102</ref> and [[post-production]] on ''[[Blood Simple]]'' (1985), in which Joel and Ethan Coen shared a house with Raimi. The Coens and Raimi were inspired by the films of [[Preston Sturges]], such as ''[[Christmas in July (film)|Christmas in July]]'' (1940) and the Hollywood satire ''[[Sullivan's Travels]]'' (1941).<ref name=manner/> The sentimental tone and decency of ordinary men as heroes was influenced by films of [[Frank Capra]], like ''[[Mr. Deeds Goes to Town]]'' (1936), ''[[Meet John Doe]]'' (1941), and ''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946).<ref>{{cite book|language=it| first= Alessandro |last=Agostinelli |author-link=Alessandro Agostinelli | title = Un mondo perfetto. I comandamenti dei fratelli Coen| publisher=Controluce | page=111 }}</ref> The dialogue is an [[Homage (arts)|homage]] to [[Howard Hawks]]' ''[[His Girl Friday]]'' (1940), while [[Jennifer Jason Leigh]]'s performance as fast-talking reporter Amy Archer is reminiscent of [[Rosalind Russell]] and [[Katharine Hepburn]], in both the physical and vocal mannerisms.<ref name="manner">Levin, pp. 103–118</ref> Other movies that observers found references to include ''[[Executive Suite]]'' (1954) and ''[[Sweet Smell of Success]]'' (1957).<ref name=Fonda/> The brothers had no intention of commenting on or parodying such movies. Instead, as Ethan said, "It's the case where, having seen those movies, we say 'They're really fun - let's do one'; as opposed to 'They're really fun- let's comment upon them.'" Raimi describes the script as "big-business comedy. It's a return to the very large love story comedies they used to make in the forties and early fifties."<ref name=":1" /> So the brothers started to pace around their apartment, taking turns on the typewriter, and when they found themselves stuck at a point, Raimi would do all sorts of tricks to get the boys back up. For example, while Ethan is pacing around, he would move things around the apartment so Ethan would be thrown off, he even said he threw firecrackers at them.<ref name=":1" />
The [[Coen brothers]] first met [[Sam Raimi]] when Joel Coen worked as an assistant editor on Raimi's ''[[The Evil Dead]]'' (1981). Together, they began writing the script for ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' in 1981,<ref>Muir, p. 77</ref> and continued during the filming of ''[[Crimewave]]'' (1985),<ref>Warren, pp. 101–102</ref> and [[post-production]] on ''[[Blood Simple]]'' (1984), during which Joel and Ethan Coen shared a house with Raimi. The Coens and Raimi were inspired by the films of [[Preston Sturges]], such as ''[[Christmas in July (film)|Christmas in July]]'' (1940) and the Hollywood satire ''[[Sullivan's Travels]]'' (1941).<ref name=manner/> The sentimental tone and decency of ordinary men as heroes was influenced by films of [[Frank Capra]], like ''[[Mr. Deeds Goes to Town]]'' (1936), ''[[Meet John Doe]]'' (1941), and ''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]'' (1946).<ref>{{cite book|language=it| first= Alessandro |last=Agostinelli |author-link=Alessandro Agostinelli | title = Un mondo perfetto. I comandamenti dei fratelli Coen| publisher=Controluce | page=111 }}</ref> The dialogue is an [[Homage (arts)|homage]] to [[Howard Hawks]]' ''[[His Girl Friday]]'' (1940), while [[Jennifer Jason Leigh]]'s performance as fast-talking reporter Amy Archer is reminiscent of [[Rosalind Russell]] and [[Katharine Hepburn]], in both the physical and vocal mannerisms.<ref name="manner">Levin, pp. 103–118</ref> Other movies that observers found references to include ''[[Executive Suite]]'' (1954) and ''[[Sweet Smell of Success]]'' (1957).<ref name=Fonda/> The brothers had no intention of commenting on or parodying such movies. Instead, as Ethan said, "It's the case where, having seen those movies, we say 'They're really fun - let's do one'; as opposed to 'They're really fun- let's comment upon them.'" Raimi describes the script as "big-business comedy. It's a return to the very large love story comedies they used to make in the forties and early fifties."<ref name=":1" /> So the brothers started to pace around their apartment, taking turns on the typewriter, and when they found themselves stuck at a point, Raimi would do all sorts of tricks to get the boys back up. For example, while Ethan is pacing around, he would move things around the apartment so Ethan would be thrown off, he even said he threw firecrackers at them.<ref name=":1" />


One film critic described the numerous influences: "From his infelicitous name to his physical clumsiness, Norville Barnes is a Preston Sturges hero trapped in a Frank Capra story, and never should that twain meet, especially not in a world that seems to have been created by [[Fritz Lang]] – the mechanistic monstrousness of the mailroom contrasted with the [[Bauhaus]] gigantism of the corporate offices perfectly matches the boss-labour split in ''[[Metropolis (1927 film)|Metropolis]]'' (1927)."<ref name=Gilliam/> An interviewer proposed that the characters represent [[capitalism]] versus [[labour economics]]. Joel Coen replied: "Maybe the characters do embody those grand themes you mentioned, but that question is independent of whether or not we're interested in them – and we're not."<ref name=Capital/> ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' presents various [[Motif (narrative)|narrative motif]]s pertaining to the [[Rota Fortunae]] and [[motif (visual arts)|visual motif]]s concerning the shape of circles. This includes Moses' monologue at the beginning, the Hudsucker Clock, Mussburger's wristwatch, the inventions of both the hula hoop and frisbee, as well as Norville and Amy's conversation about [[Karma]].<ref name=Fonda/>
One film critic described the numerous influences: "From his infelicitous name to his physical clumsiness, Norville Barnes is a Preston Sturges hero trapped in a Frank Capra story, and never should that twain meet, especially not in a world that seems to have been created by [[Fritz Lang]] – the mechanistic monstrousness of the mailroom contrasted with the [[Bauhaus]] gigantism of the corporate offices perfectly matches the boss-labour split in ''[[Metropolis (1927 film)|Metropolis]]'' (1927)."<ref name=Gilliam/> An interviewer proposed that the characters represent [[capitalism]] versus [[labour economics]]. Joel Coen replied: "Maybe the characters do embody those grand themes you mentioned, but that question is independent of whether or not we're interested in them – and we're not."<ref name=Capital/> ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' presents various [[Motif (narrative)|narrative motif]]s pertaining to the [[Rota Fortunae]] and [[motif (visual arts)|visual motif]]s concerning the shape of circles. This includes Moses' monologue at the beginning, the Hudsucker Clock, Mussburger's wristwatch, the inventions of both the hula hoop and frisbee, as well as Norville and Amy's conversation about [[Karma]].<ref name=Fonda/>
Line 101: Line 101:
The first image the Coens and Raimi conceived was of Norville Barnes about to jump from the window of a skyscraper and then they had to figure out how he got there and how to save him.<ref name="Bergan">Bergan, pp. 148–162</ref> The inclusion of the [[hula hoop]] came as a result of a [[plot device]]. Joel remembers, "We had to come up with something that Norville was going to invent that on the face of it was ridiculous. Something that would seem, by any sort of rational measure, to be doomed to failure, but something that on the other hand the audience already knew was going to be a phenomenal success."<ref name=Gilliam/> Ethan said, "The whole circle motif was built into the design of the movie, and that just made it seem more appropriate."<ref name=Gilliam/> Joel: "What grew out of that was the design element which drives the movie. The tension between vertical lines and circles; you have these tall buildings, then these circles everywhere which are echoed in the plot...in the structure of the movie itself. It starts with the end and circles back to the beginning, with a big flashback."<ref name=Gilliam/> It took the Coens and Raimi three months to write the screenplay. As early as 1985, the Coens were quoted as saying that an upcoming project "takes place in the late Fifties in a skyscraper and is about [[Big Business]]. The characters talk fast and wear sharp clothes."<ref name="Gilliam">Woods, pp. 125–135</ref>
The first image the Coens and Raimi conceived was of Norville Barnes about to jump from the window of a skyscraper and then they had to figure out how he got there and how to save him.<ref name="Bergan">Bergan, pp. 148–162</ref> The inclusion of the [[hula hoop]] came as a result of a [[plot device]]. Joel remembers, "We had to come up with something that Norville was going to invent that on the face of it was ridiculous. Something that would seem, by any sort of rational measure, to be doomed to failure, but something that on the other hand the audience already knew was going to be a phenomenal success."<ref name=Gilliam/> Ethan said, "The whole circle motif was built into the design of the movie, and that just made it seem more appropriate."<ref name=Gilliam/> Joel: "What grew out of that was the design element which drives the movie. The tension between vertical lines and circles; you have these tall buildings, then these circles everywhere which are echoed in the plot...in the structure of the movie itself. It starts with the end and circles back to the beginning, with a big flashback."<ref name=Gilliam/> It took the Coens and Raimi three months to write the screenplay. As early as 1985, the Coens were quoted as saying that an upcoming project "takes place in the late Fifties in a skyscraper and is about [[Big Business]]. The characters talk fast and wear sharp clothes."<ref name="Gilliam">Woods, pp. 125–135</ref>


Despite having finished the script in 1985, Joel explained, "We couldn't make ''Hudsucker'' back then because we weren't that popular yet. Plus, the script was too expensive and we had just completed ''[[Blood Simple]]'', which was an [[independent film]]."<ref name="Silver">Woods, pp. 9–10, 122–124</ref> After completing ''[[Barton Fink]]'' (1991), the Coens were looking forward to doing a more mainstream film.<ref>{{cite magazine | author = Juliann Garey | url = https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,305444,00.html | title = Coen to Extremes | magazine = [[Entertainment Weekly]] | date = 1993-02-05 | access-date = 2008-11-22}}</ref> ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' was revived and the Coens and Raimi performed a brief rewrite. Producer [[Joel Silver]], a fan of the Coens' previous films, acquired the script for his [[production company]], [[Silver Pictures]], and [[pitch (filmmaking)|pitch]]ed the project at [[Warner Bros.]] Pictures. Silver also allowed the Coens complete [[artistic control]].<ref name=Bergan/>
Despite having finished the script in 1985, Joel explained, "We couldn't make ''Hudsucker'' back then because we weren't that popular yet. Plus, the script was too expensive and we had just completed ''[[Blood Simple]]'', which was an [[independent film]]."<ref name="Silver">Woods, pp. 9–10, 122–124</ref> After completing ''[[Barton Fink]]'' (1991), the Coens were looking forward to doing a more mainstream film.<ref>{{cite magazine | author = Juliann Garey | url = https://ew.com/article/1993/02/05/coen-brothers/ | title = Coen to Extremes | magazine = [[Entertainment Weekly]] | date = 1993-02-05 | access-date = 2008-11-22}}</ref> ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' was revived and the Coens and Raimi performed a brief rewrite. Producer [[Joel Silver]], a fan of the Coens' previous films, acquired the script for his [[production company]], [[Silver Pictures]], and [[pitch (filmmaking)|pitch]]ed the project at [[Warner Bros.]] Pictures. Silver also allowed the Coens complete [[artistic control]].<ref name=Bergan/>


===Production===
===Production===
This was the first time the Coen brothers chose big stars to act in one of their films.<ref name=":0" /> [[Joel Silver]]'s first choice for Norville Barnes was [[Tom Cruise]], but the Coens persisted in a desire to cast [[Tim Robbins]].<ref>{{cite news | author = Anne Thompson | url = https://www.variety.com/article/VR1117976123 | title = Coen brothers keep it real | work = [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date = 2007-11-15 | access-date = 2008-11-21 | author-link = Anne Thompson (film critic)}}</ref> [[Jon Cryer]] auditioned for the lead role of Norville Barnes.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XyPTCwAAQBAJ&q=jon+cryer+The+Hudsucker+Proxy+so+that+happened+a+memoir+google+books&pg=PA210|title=So That Happened: A Memoir|isbn=9780451472366|last1=Cryer|first1=Jon|date=5 April 2016|publisher=Penguin Publishing }}</ref> [[Winona Ryder]] and [[Bridget Fonda]] were in competition for the role of Amy Archer, before [[Jennifer Jason Leigh]] was cast.<ref name="Fonda">Mottram, pp. 93–113</ref> Leigh had previously auditioned for a role in the Coens's ''Miller's Crossing'' and ''Barton Fink''; her failed auditions prompted the Coens to cast her in ''The Hudsucker Proxy''.<ref name=Silver/> To prepare for her role as Amy Archer, Leigh read the biographies of some of the most substantial ladies of the thirties and forties such as [[Rosalind Russell]], [[Katharine Hepburn]], and [[Jean Arthur]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title = The Coen Brothers, The Story of Two American Filmmakers|last = Levine|first = Josh|publisher = ECW|year = 2000|isbn = 1-55022-424-7|location = United States}}</ref> When casting the role of Sidney Mussburger, "Warner Bros. suggested all sorts of names," remembered Joel. "A lot of them were comedians who were clearly wrong. Mussburger is the bad guy and [[Paul Newman]] brought that character to life."<ref name=Silver/> However, the Coens first offered the role to [[Clint Eastwood]], but he was forced to turn it down due to scheduling conflicts.<ref>{{cite news | author = Leonard Klady | url = https://www.variety.com/article/VR108653.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&query=devito+looking+to+get+shorty | title = DeVito looking to get 'Shorty' into production | work = [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date = 1993-07-13 | access-date = 2008-11-21}}</ref> The Coens also offered their longtime friend [[Bruce Campbell]] an audition, but he initially refused, writing that "My history with the Coens spanned more than a decade...I would gladly and willingly accept the role, but these fellows knew my work well enough to spare me the audition." The Coens agreed and Campbell was offered, ''sans'' audition, the role of Smitty. Campbell was later effusive in his praise for the professionalism of the production and the other cast members, as well as being in awe that he was chosen to help Paul Newman rehearse before filming began.<ref>Campbell, Bruce. If Chins Could Kill (pp. 311-312). St. Martin's Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.</ref>
This was the first time the Coen brothers chose big stars to act in one of their films.<ref name=":0" /> [[Joel Silver]]'s first choice for Norville Barnes was [[Tom Cruise]], but the Coens persisted in a desire to cast [[Tim Robbins]].<ref>{{cite news | author = Anne Thompson | url = https://variety.com/2007/voices/columns/coen-brothers-keep-it-real-1117976123/ | title = Coen brothers keep it real | work = [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date = 2007-11-15 | access-date = 2008-11-21 | author-link = Anne Thompson (film critic)}}</ref> [[Jon Cryer]] auditioned for the lead role of Norville Barnes.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XyPTCwAAQBAJ&q=jon+cryer+The+Hudsucker+Proxy+so+that+happened+a+memoir+google+books&pg=PA210|title=So That Happened: A Memoir|isbn=9780451472366|last1=Cryer|first1=Jon|date=5 April 2016|publisher=Penguin Publishing }}</ref> [[Winona Ryder]] and [[Bridget Fonda]] were in competition for the role of Amy Archer, before [[Jennifer Jason Leigh]] was cast.<ref name="Fonda">Mottram, pp. 93–113</ref><ref>[https://coveredgeekly.com/winona-ryder-reveals-jeff-bridges-refused-to-kiss-her/?fbclid=IwY2xjawFce0NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHQrhcylH7f7OwAzdbEp9VGAsVMiOfhCC7aOHqLaUS3YQWLl7wAVI2J5lBg_aem_r7yyArl64bWaGpnQEPdaYA Winona Ryder reveals Jeff Bridges ‘refused’ to kiss her in an audition due to age difference]</ref> Leigh had previously auditioned for a role in the Coens's ''Miller's Crossing'' and ''Barton Fink''; her failed auditions prompted the Coens to cast her in ''The Hudsucker Proxy''.<ref name=Silver/> To prepare for her role as Amy Archer, Leigh read the biographies of some of the most substantial ladies of the thirties and forties such as [[Rosalind Russell]], [[Katharine Hepburn]], and [[Jean Arthur]].<ref name=":1">{{Cite book|title = The Coen Brothers, The Story of Two American Filmmakers|last = Levine|first = Josh|publisher = ECW|year = 2000|isbn = 1-55022-424-7|location = United States}}</ref> When casting the role of Sidney Mussburger, "Warner Bros. suggested all sorts of names," remembered Joel. "A lot of them were comedians who were clearly wrong. Mussburger is the bad guy and [[Paul Newman]] brought that character to life."<ref name=Silver/> However, the Coens first offered the role to [[Clint Eastwood]], but he was forced to turn it down due to scheduling conflicts.<ref>{{cite news | author = Leonard Klady | url = https://variety.com/1993/film/news/devito-looking-to-get-shorty-into-production-108653/ | title = DeVito looking to get 'Shorty' into production | work = [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date = 1993-07-13 | access-date = 2008-11-21}}</ref> The Coens also offered their longtime friend [[Bruce Campbell]] an audition, but he initially refused, writing that "My history with the Coens spanned more than a decade...I would gladly and willingly accept the role, but these fellows knew my work well enough to spare me the audition." The Coens agreed and Campbell was offered, ''sans'' audition, the role of Smitty. Campbell was later effusive in his praise for the professionalism of the production and the other cast members, as well as being in awe that he was chosen to help Paul Newman rehearse before filming began.<ref>Campbell, Bruce. If Chins Could Kill (pp. 311-312). St. Martin's Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.</ref>


Once Newman and Robbins signed on, [[PolyGram Filmed Entertainment]] and [[Working Title Films]] agreed to co-finance the film with Warner Bros. and Silver Pictures.<ref>{{cite magazine | author = Nisid Hajari | url = https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,301615,00.html | title = Beavis and Egghead | magazine = [[Entertainment Weekly]] | date = 1994-04-01 | access-date = 2008-11-22}}</ref> The film was shot on five [[sound stage]]s at Carolco Studios in [[Wilmington, North Carolina]], beginning on November 30, 1992. Raimi served as [[second unit director]], shooting the hula hoop sequence and Waring Hudsucker's suicide.<ref name=Silver/> [[Production designer]] [[Dennis Gassner]] was influenced by [[fascist architecture]], particularly the work of [[Albert Speer]], as well as [[Terry Gilliam]]'s ''[[Brazil (1985 film)|Brazil]]'' (1985),<ref name=Bergan/> [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] and the [[Art Deco]] movement.<ref name="Robson">Robson, pp. 139–142</ref> Gassner contemplated using five huge rooms needed to accommodate the sound stages. Gassner noted "You see, we wanted things to be big." He said that the huge 1950s-inspired table up in the boardroom was so long, it had to be built in five sections and later on assembled on the soundstage. The intention for the set sizes was to generate an oppressive feel.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title = Coen Brothers|last = Robson|first = Eddie|publisher = Virgin Book|year = 2007}}</ref> [[Principal photography]] ended on March 18, 1993.<ref name=Silver/>
Once Newman and Robbins signed on, [[PolyGram Filmed Entertainment]] and [[Working Title Films]] agreed to co-finance the film with Warner Bros. and Silver Pictures.<ref>{{cite magazine | author = Nisid Hajari | url = https://ew.com/article/1994/04/01/what-it-coen-brothers/ | title = Beavis and Egghead | magazine = [[Entertainment Weekly]] | date = 1994-04-01 | access-date = 2008-11-22}}</ref> The film was shot on five [[sound stage]]s at Carolco Studios in [[Wilmington, North Carolina]], beginning on November 30, 1992. Raimi served as [[second unit director]], shooting the hula hoop sequence and Waring Hudsucker's suicide.<ref name=Silver/> [[Production designer]] [[Dennis Gassner]] was influenced by [[fascist architecture]], particularly the work of [[Albert Speer]], as well as [[Terry Gilliam]]'s ''[[Brazil (1985 film)|Brazil]]'' (1985),<ref name=Bergan/> [[Frank Lloyd Wright]] and the [[Art Deco]] movement.<ref name="Robson">Robson, pp. 139–142</ref> Gassner contemplated using five huge rooms needed to accommodate the sound stages. Gassner noted "You see, we wanted things to be big." He said that the huge 1950s-inspired table up in the boardroom was so long, it had to be built in five sections and later on assembled on the soundstage. The intention for the set sizes was to generate an oppressive feel.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title = Coen Brothers|last = Robson|first = Eddie|publisher = Virgin Book|year = 2007}}</ref> [[Principal photography]] ended on March 18, 1993.<ref name=Silver/>


In addition, numerous sequences were filmed in downtown Chicago, particularly in the [[Merchandise Mart]] building for the entrance and lobby to Hudsucker Industries and [[The Blackstone Hotel]] Christmas ballroom.{{citation needed|date=November 2011}}
In addition, numerous sequences were filmed in downtown Chicago, particularly in the [[Merchandise Mart]] building for the entrance and lobby to Hudsucker Industries and [[The Blackstone Hotel]] Christmas ballroom.{{citation needed|date=November 2011}}
Line 113: Line 113:


===Visual effects===
===Visual effects===
The [[visual effects supervisor]] was [[Michael J. McAlister]] (''[[Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade]]'', ''[[Willow (1988 film)|Willow]]'') with [[Mark Stetson]] (''[[Superman Returns]]'', ''[[Peter Pan (2003 film)|Peter Pan]]'') as miniatures supervisor. Peter Chesney, mechanical effects designer on many Coen brothers films, created a pair of 16-foot angel wings for actor [[Charles Durning]], who portrayed Waring Hudsucker. "I made a complicated [[armature (electrical engineering)|steel armature]] with a lot of [[electric motor]]s to time everything so he can fold up his wings, unfold them and flap them about. Then we covered them with real duck and turkey feathers," says Chesney. "We modeled them after photographs of a hovering [[columbidae|dove]] landing in [[slow motion]]."<ref>{{cite news | author=Staff | url=https://www.variety.com/article/VR103029 | title=Hollywood's still playing for effect | work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date=1993-01-18 | access-date=2008-11-21}}</ref> The buildings in the background (designed by McAlister and Stetson) were 1:24 [[scale model]]s, shot separately and merged in [[post-production]]. To lengthen the sequence, the model of the Hudsucker building was the equivalent of 90 stories, not 45.<ref>{{cite magazine | author=George Mannes | title=The 'Hud' Thud | url=https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,301802,00.html | magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]] | date=1994-04-15 | access-date=2008-11-22}}</ref>
The [[visual effects supervisor]] was [[Michael J. McAlister]] (''[[Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade]]'', ''[[Willow (1988 film)|Willow]]'') with [[Mark Stetson]] (''[[Superman Returns]]'', ''[[Peter Pan (2003 film)|Peter Pan]]'') as miniatures supervisor. Peter Chesney, mechanical effects designer on many Coen brothers films, created a pair of 16-foot angel wings for actor [[Charles Durning]], who portrayed Waring Hudsucker. "I made a complicated [[armature (electrical engineering)|steel armature]] with a lot of [[electric motor]]s to time everything so he can fold up his wings, unfold them and flap them about. Then we covered them with real duck and turkey feathers," says Chesney. "We modeled them after photographs of a hovering [[columbidae|dove]] landing in [[slow motion]]."<ref>{{cite news | author=Staff | url=https://variety.com/1993/film/news/hollywood-s-still-playing-for-effect-103029/ | title=Hollywood's still playing for effect | work=[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date=1993-01-18 | access-date=2008-11-21}}</ref> The buildings in the background (designed by McAlister and Stetson) were 1:24 [[scale model]]s, shot separately and merged in [[post-production]]. To lengthen the sequence, the model of the Hudsucker building was the equivalent of 90 stories, not 45.<ref>{{cite magazine | author=George Mannes | title=The 'Hud' Thud | url=https://ew.com/article/1994/04/15/charles-durnings-fall-hudsucker-proxy/ | magazine=[[Entertainment Weekly]] | date=1994-04-15 | access-date=2008-11-22}}</ref>


Despite the New York City setting, additional skyscrapers in [[Chicago, Illinois]], provided inspiration for the opening sequence of the skyline, such as the [[Merchandise Mart]] and [[Aon Center (Chicago)|Aon Center]]. Skyscrapers from New York City included the [[Chanin Building]], the [[Fred F. French Building]] and [[One Wall Street, Manhattan]]. "We took all our favorite buildings in New York from where they actually stood and sort of put them into one neighborhood," Gassner continued, "a fantasy vision which adds to the atmosphere and flavor." First of all, a model had to be created based on the fantasy 1950s New York for the opening shot. So a miniature city was created, as McAlister mentioned that the Coens did not want a realistic reproduction of 1950s New York skyline, instead they wanted a more stylized version of it.<ref name=":0" /> So Gassner used the book ''New York in The Forties'' as a reference to create the look for the cityscape. It took three months and 27 crew members to create the miniature city at the scale of 24:1. As for the Hudsucker building, they made it at the scale of 6:1 for closer shots including the long-zoom in of Norville at the beginning. For that scene to be created, it started off with a wide-angle shot, moving closer towards Tim Robbins, who was standing in a full sized set, which they inserted inside the shot of the model clock. "Marrying a live-action image with a painted or miniature element was, of course, nothing new, however, in the case of the zoom-in on Robbins from such a distance, keeping the full-size set locked in with the model building, that was state-of-the-art and the only way to do it was with computers," says McAlister.<ref name=":0" /> Most of the buildings were created with two sides only, as they are seen from only the front and the side, and some needed only one side, as they were seen from only the front, while the Hudsucker building was made completely three-dimensional.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=Robson/> The work of [[Framestore|The Computer Film Company]] (supervised by [[Janek Sirrs]]) included manipulations of the zoom-in shot of Norville at the beginning, as well as [[computer-generated imagery|CGI]] snow and composites of the falling sequences.<ref name=Robson/>
Despite the New York City setting, additional skyscrapers in [[Chicago, Illinois]], provided inspiration for the opening sequence of the skyline, such as the [[Merchandise Mart]] and [[Aon Center (Chicago)|Aon Center]]. Skyscrapers from New York City included the [[Chanin Building]], the [[Fred F. French Building]] and [[One Wall Street, Manhattan]]. "We took all our favorite buildings in New York from where they actually stood and sort of put them into one neighborhood," Gassner continued, "a fantasy vision which adds to the atmosphere and flavor." First of all, a model had to be created based on the fantasy 1950s New York for the opening shot. So a miniature city was created, as McAlister mentioned that the Coens did not want a realistic reproduction of 1950s New York skyline, instead they wanted a more stylized version of it.<ref name=":0" /> So Gassner used the book ''New York in The Forties'' as a reference to create the look for the cityscape. It took three months and 27 crew members to create the miniature city at the scale of 24:1. As for the Hudsucker building, they made it at the scale of 6:1 for closer shots including the long-zoom in of Norville at the beginning. For that scene to be created, it started off with a wide-angle shot, moving closer towards Tim Robbins, who was standing in a full sized set, which they inserted inside the shot of the model clock. "Marrying a live-action image with a painted or miniature element was, of course, nothing new, however, in the case of the zoom-in on Robbins from such a distance, keeping the full-size set locked in with the model building, that was state-of-the-art and the only way to do it was with computers," says McAlister.<ref name=":0" /> Most of the buildings were created with two sides only, as they are seen from only the front and the side, and some needed only one side, as they were seen from only the front, while the Hudsucker building was made completely three-dimensional.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=Robson/> The work of [[Framestore|The Computer Film Company]] (supervised by [[Janek Sirrs]]) included manipulations of the zoom-in shot of Norville at the beginning, as well as [[computer-generated imagery|CGI]] snow and composites of the falling sequences.<ref name=Robson/>
Line 150: Line 150:
| noprose = yes
| noprose = yes
}}
}}
The [[Film score|score]] to ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' was written by [[Carter Burwell]], the fifth of his collaborations with the Coen Brothers. "Adagio of Spartacus and Phrygia" from the ballet ''[[Spartacus (ballet)|Spartacus]]'' by Khachaturian is the basis of the main theme and additional music from the ballet runs under the Hula-Hoop sequence. The popular music of the time is also reflected in the character of Vic Tenetta (played by [[Peter Gallagher]]), modeled after [[Dean Martin]], who sings "Memories Are Made of This." Additional inspiration comes from [[Aram Khachaturian]]'s ''[[Gayane (ballet)|Gayane]]'' suite. A section from the ballet is used by Burwell for the scene in which Norville and Amy meet for the first time. The composer's "Dance of the Young Mountaineers" is used when a young boy is the first to try the [[hula hoop]], followed by "[[Sabre Dance]]" (both from ''Gayane'').<ref name=Robson/>
The [[Film score|score]] to ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' was written by [[Carter Burwell]], the fifth of his collaborations with the Coen Brothers. "Adagio of Spartacus and Phrygia" from [[Aram Khachaturian]]'s ballet ''[[Spartacus (ballet)|Spartacus]]'' is the basis of the main theme and additional music from the ballet runs under the Hula-Hoop sequence. The popular music of the time is also reflected in the character of Vic Tenetta ([[Peter Gallagher]]), modeled after [[Dean Martin]], who sings "Memories Are Made of This." Additional inspiration comes from Khachaturian's ''[[Gayane (ballet)|Gayane]]'' suite. A section from the ballet is used by Burwell for the scene in which Norville and Amy meet for the first time. The composer's "Dance of the Young Mountaineers" is used when a young boy is the first to try the [[hula hoop]], followed by "[[Sabre Dance]]" (both from ''Gayane'').<ref name=Robson/>


==Release==
==Release==
Line 157: Line 157:
[[Warner Bros.]] held [[test screening]]s and audience comments were largely mixed. The studio suggested re-shoots, but the Coens, who held [[final cut privilege]], refused because they were very nervous working with their biggest budget to date and were eager for mainstream success. The producers eventually added footage that had been cut and also shot minor [[Pick-up (filmmaking)|pick-up]]s for the ending.<ref name=Silver/> ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' claimed that the pick-ups were done to try to save the film because Warner feared it was going to be a [[box office bomb]]. Joel Coen addressed the issue in an interview: "First of all, they weren't reshoots. They were a little bit of additional footage. We wanted to shoot a fight scene at the end of the movie. It was the product of something we discovered editing the movie, not previewing it. We've done additional shooting on every movie, so it's normal."<ref name=Silver/>
[[Warner Bros.]] held [[test screening]]s and audience comments were largely mixed. The studio suggested re-shoots, but the Coens, who held [[final cut privilege]], refused because they were very nervous working with their biggest budget to date and were eager for mainstream success. The producers eventually added footage that had been cut and also shot minor [[Pick-up (filmmaking)|pick-up]]s for the ending.<ref name=Silver/> ''[[Variety (magazine)|Variety]]'' claimed that the pick-ups were done to try to save the film because Warner feared it was going to be a [[box office bomb]]. Joel Coen addressed the issue in an interview: "First of all, they weren't reshoots. They were a little bit of additional footage. We wanted to shoot a fight scene at the end of the movie. It was the product of something we discovered editing the movie, not previewing it. We've done additional shooting on every movie, so it's normal."<ref name=Silver/>


The film premiered in January 1994 at the [[Sundance Film Festival]] in [[Park City, Utah]].<ref>{{cite news | author = Caryn James | title = Critic's Notebook; For Sundance, Struggle to Survive Success | work = [[The New York Times]] | date = 1994-01-25 | access-date = 2009-04-11 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/01/25/movies/critic-s-notebook-for-sundance-struggle-to-survive-success.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm}}</ref> In addition, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' opened the [[1994 Cannes Film Festival]]<ref name="festival-cannes.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/3007961/year/1994.html |title=Festival de Cannes: The Hudsucker Proxy |access-date=2009-08-27|work=festival-cannes.com}}</ref> on May 12, 1994. The film was in competition for the [[Palme d'Or]], but lost to ''[[Pulp Fiction (film)|Pulp Fiction]]''.<ref>{{cite news | author = Staff | url = https://www.variety.com/article/VR120356 | title = Euro pix man Cannes | work = [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date = 1994-04-21 | access-date = 2008-11-21}}</ref> ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' was released on March 11, 1994, and only grossed $2,816,518 in the United States and Canada.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hudsuckerproxy.htm | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | work = [[Box Office Mojo]] | access-date = 2008-11-17}}</ref> Worldwide, it grossed $11.3 million.<ref name=chumps/> The production budget was officially set at [[United States dollar|$]]25 million,<ref name=Silver/> although, it was reported to have increased to $40 million for marketing and promotion purposes. The film was a box office bomb.<ref name=manner/>
The film premiered in January 1994 at the [[Sundance Film Festival]] in [[Park City, Utah]].<ref>{{cite news | author = Caryn James | title = Critic's Notebook; For Sundance, Struggle to Survive Success | work = [[The New York Times]] | date = 1994-01-25 | access-date = 2009-04-11 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/01/25/movies/critic-s-notebook-for-sundance-struggle-to-survive-success.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm}}</ref> In addition, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' opened the [[1994 Cannes Film Festival]]<ref name="festival-cannes.com">{{cite web |url=http://www.festival-cannes.com/en/archives/ficheFilm/id/3007961/year/1994.html |title=Festival de Cannes: The Hudsucker Proxy |access-date=2009-08-27|work=festival-cannes.com}}</ref> on May 12, 1994. The film was in competition for the [[Palme d'Or]], but lost to ''[[Pulp Fiction (film)|Pulp Fiction]]''.<ref>{{cite news | author = Staff | url = https://variety.com/1994/film/news/euro-pix-man-cannes-120356/ | title = Euro pix man Cannes | work = [[Variety (magazine)|Variety]] | date = 1994-04-21 | access-date = 2008-11-21}}</ref> ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' was released on March 11, 1994, and only grossed $2,816,518 in the United States and Canada.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=hudsuckerproxy.htm | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | work = [[Box Office Mojo]] | access-date = 2008-11-17}}</ref> Worldwide, it grossed $11.3 million.<ref name=chumps/> The production budget was officially set at [[United States dollar|$]]25 million,<ref name=Silver/> although, it was reported to have increased to $40 million for marketing and promotion purposes. The film was a box office bomb.<ref name=manner/>


===Critical response===
===Critical response===
In addition to the film under-performing at the box office, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' opened to mixed reviews from critics. On [[Rotten Tomatoes]] 63% of reviews from 52 critics were positive, with an average rating of 6.6/10. The site's consensus states, "Intriguingly strange and visually distinctive, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' is ultimately almost – but not quite – as smart and absorbing as it needs to be."<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hudsucker_proxy/ | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | work = [[Rotten Tomatoes]] | access-date = 2024-02-29}}</ref>
In addition to the film under-performing at the box office, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' opened to mixed reviews from critics. On [[Rotten Tomatoes]] 63% of reviews from 52 critics were positive, with an average rating of 6.6/10. The site's consensus states, "Intriguingly strange and visually distinctive, ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' is ultimately almost – but not quite – as smart and absorbing as it needs to be."<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hudsucker_proxy/ | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | work = [[Rotten Tomatoes]] | access-date = 2024-02-29}}</ref>


[[Roger Ebert]] praised the [[production design]], [[scale model]] work, [[matte painting]]s, [[cinematography]], and characters. "But the problem with the movie is that it's all surface and no substance," Ebert wrote. "Not even the slightest attempt is made to suggest that the film takes its own story seriously. Everything is style. The performances seem deliberately angled as satire."<ref>{{cite news | author = Roger Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | url =http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940325/REVIEWS/403250301/1023 | work = [[Chicago Sun-Times]] | date = 1994-05-25 | access-date = 2008-11-20}}{{Dead link|date=June 2024}}</ref> [[Desson Thomson]] of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' described ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' as being "pointlessly flashy and compulsively overloaded with references to films of the 1930s. Missing in this film's performances is a sense of humanity, the crucial ingredient in the movies ''Hudsucker'' is clearly trying to evoke. ''Hudsucker'' isn't the real thing at all. It's just a proxy."<ref>{{cite news | author = Desson Thomson |author-link=Desson Thomson | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | newspaper = [[The Washington Post]] | date = 1994-03-25 | access-date = 2008-11-20 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/thehudsuckerproxypghowe_a0b041.htm}}</ref>
[[Roger Ebert]] praised the [[production design]], [[scale model]] work, [[matte painting]]s, [[cinematography]], and characters. "But the problem with the movie is that it's all surface and no substance," Ebert wrote. "Not even the slightest attempt is made to suggest that the film takes its own story seriously. Everything is style. The performances seem deliberately angled as satire."<ref>{{cite news | author = Roger Ebert |author-link=Roger Ebert | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | url =http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940325/REVIEWS/403250301/1023 | archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20070930061200/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940325/REVIEWS/403250301/1023 | url-status =dead | archive-date =September 30, 2007 | work = [[Chicago Sun-Times]] | date = 1994-05-25 | access-date = 2008-11-20}}</ref> [[Desson Thomson]] of ''[[The Washington Post]]'' described ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' as being "pointlessly flashy and compulsively overloaded with references to films of the 1930s. Missing in this film's performances is a sense of humanity, the crucial ingredient in the movies ''Hudsucker'' is clearly trying to evoke. ''Hudsucker'' isn't the real thing at all. It's just a proxy."<ref>{{cite news | author = Desson Thomson |author-link=Desson Thomson | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | newspaper = [[The Washington Post]] | date = 1994-03-25 | access-date = 2008-11-20 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/thehudsuckerproxypghowe_a0b041.htm}}</ref>


[[John Simon (critic)|John Simon]] of ''[[National Review]]'' described ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' as "asinine and insufferable".<ref>{{cite book |title=John Simon on Film: Criticism 1982-2001|last1=Simon|first1=John |publisher=Applause Books |year=2005 |pages=493}}</ref>
[[John Simon (critic)|John Simon]] of ''[[National Review]]'' described ''The Hudsucker Proxy'' as "asinine and insufferable".<ref>{{cite book |title=John Simon on Film: Criticism 1982-2001|last1=Simon|first1=John |publisher=Applause Books |year=2005 |pages=493}}</ref>
Line 203: Line 203:
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Wikiquote}}
* {{IMDb title|0110074}}
* {{IMDb title|0110074}}
* {{Amg movie|131165}}
* {{cite magazine | author = Richard Schickel | author-link = Richard Schickel | url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,980305,00.html | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20050111225418/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,980305,00.html | url-status = dead | archive-date = January 11, 2005 | title = Half-Baked in Corporate Hell | magazine = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | date = 1994-03-14 | access-date = 2013-09-08}}
* {{cite magazine | author = Richard Schickel | author-link = Richard Schickel | url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,980305,00.html | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20050111225418/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,980305,00.html | url-status = dead | archive-date = January 11, 2005 | title = Half-Baked in Corporate Hell | magazine = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | date = 1994-03-14 | access-date = 2013-09-08}}
* {{cite magazine | author = Owen Gleiberman | author-link = Owen Gleiberman | url = https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,301350,00.html | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | magazine = [[Entertainment Weekly]] | date = 1994-03-11 | access-date =2013-09-08}}
* {{cite magazine | author = Owen Gleiberman | author-link = Owen Gleiberman | url = https://ew.com/article/1994/03/11/hudsucker-proxy/ | title = The Hudsucker Proxy | magazine = [[Entertainment Weekly]] | date = 1994-03-11 | access-date =2013-09-08}}


{{Coen brothers}}
{{Coen brothers}}
Line 230: Line 229:
[[Category:Films set in offices]]
[[Category:Films set in offices]]
[[Category:Films shot in Chicago]]
[[Category:Films shot in Chicago]]
[[Category:Films shot in North Carolina]]
[[Category:Films shot in Raleigh, North Carolina]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Sam Raimi]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by Sam Raimi]]
[[Category:Films set around New Year]]
[[Category:Films set around New Year]]
Line 242: Line 241:
[[Category:1990s Christmas comedy-drama films]]
[[Category:1990s Christmas comedy-drama films]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by the Coen brothers]]
[[Category:Films with screenplays by the Coen brothers]]
[[Category:English-language Christmas comedy-drama films]]

Latest revision as of 09:19, 25 December 2024

The Hudsucker Proxy
Theatrical release poster
Directed byJoel Coen
Written by
Produced byEthan Coen
Starring
CinematographyRoger Deakins
Edited byThom Noble
Music byCarter Burwell
Production
companies
Distributed by
Release dates
  • January 27, 1994 (1994-01-27) (Sundance)
  • March 11, 1994 (1994-03-11) (United States)
  • September 2, 1994 (1994-09-02) (United Kingdom)
Running time
111 minutes
Countries
  • United Kingdom
  • United States[2]
LanguageEnglish
Budget$25 million[3]
Box office$11 million[4]

The Hudsucker Proxy is a 1994 screwball comedy film co-written, produced, and directed by the Coen brothers. Sam Raimi co-wrote the script and served as second unit director. The film stars Tim Robbins as a naïve but ambitious business school graduate who is installed as president of a manufacturing company, Jennifer Jason Leigh as a newspaper reporter, and Paul Newman as a company director who hires the graduate as part of a stock scam.

The script was finished in 1985, but production did not start until 1991, when Joel Silver acquired the script for Silver Pictures. Warner Bros. subsequently agreed to distribute the film, with further financing from PolyGram Filmed Entertainment and Working Title Films. Filming at Carolco Studios in Wilmington, North Carolina, lasted from November 1992 to March 1993. The New York City scale model set was designed by Michael J. McAlister and Mark Stetson, with further effects provided by The Computer Film Company.

Upon its release in March 1994, The Hudsucker Proxy received mixed reviews from critics and bombed at the box office, but has since gained a cult following.[5]

Plot

[edit]

In December 1958, Norville Barnes, a business college graduate from Muncie, Indiana, arrives in New York City, looking for a job. He struggles due to lack of experience and becomes a mailroom clerk at Hudsucker Industries, a large corporation. Soon thereafter, the company's founder and president, Waring Hudsucker, unexpectedly commits suicide during a business meeting by jumping out of a top-floor window.

Afterward, Sidney J. Mussburger, a ruthless member of the company's board of directors, knowing that Hudsucker Industries' bylaws call for Hudsucker's stock shares to be sold to the public, suggests a scheme to buy the controlling interest in the company by temporarily depressing the stock price by hiring a clearly incompetent president to run the business.

In the mailroom, Norville is assigned to deliver a "Blue Letter" to Mussburger. The letter is a top-secret communication from Hudsucker, sent shortly before his death. However, Norville does not deliver the letter; instead, he pitches Mussburger an invention of his (indicated with no other explanation than a simple drawing of a circle and his cryptic explanation, "you know: for kids"). Believing Norville to be an idiot, Mussburger selects him as a proxy for Hudsucker.

Across town, Amy Archer, a brassy Pulitzer Prize–winning reporter for the Manhattan Argus newspaper, is assigned to write a story about Norville and find out what kind of man he really is. She obtains a job at Hudsucker Industries as his personal secretary, pretending to be yet another desperate graduate from his alma mater in Muncie.

One night, Amy searches the building for clues and meets Moses, who operates the tower's giant clock and knows "just about anything if it concerns Hudsucker". He tells her Mussburger's plot, and she takes the story back to her Chief, but he does not believe it.

The other executives at Hudsucker Industries decide to produce Norville's invention in hopes that it will flop and further depress the company's stock. However, the invention is the hula-hoop, which initially fails in obscurity but then becomes an enormous success.

Norville allows success to go to his head and becomes yet another uncaring tycoon. Amy, who had fallen for his naive charm, is infuriated over Norville's new attitude and leaves him. Buzz, the eager elevator operator, pitches a new invention: the bendy straw, which Buzz calls the "Buzz-sucker." Norville insults the idea and cruelly fires Buzz, ignoring his pleas that he needs the job.

Meanwhile, Aloysius, a Hudsucker janitor, discovers Amy's true identity and informs Mussburger. Mussburger reveals Amy's secret identity to Norville and tells him he will be dismissed as president after the new year. Mussburger also convinces the board that Norville is insane and must be sent to the local psychiatric hospital.

On New Year's Eve, Amy finds Norville drunk at a beatnik bar. She apologizes, but he storms out and is chased by an angry mob led by Buzz. Norville escapes to the top floor of the Hudsucker skyscraper and changes back into his mailroom uniform. He climbs out on the ledge, where Aloysius locks him out and watches as he slips and falls off the building at the stroke of midnight.

While Norville plummets, Moses stops the building's giant clock, which freezes time. Waring Hudsucker appears to Norville as an angel and tells him to read the Blue Letter (still in Norville's uniform pocket) that was supposed to be delivered to Mussburger: it contains Hudsucker's instructions to transfer his shares to his immediate successor as president, rather than to the public. This would have been Mussburger, but, unaware of this, he proceeded with his scheme to elect Norville.

Inside the building's giant clock, Moses fights Aloysius, defeating him. Norville descends safely to the ground. He and Amy reconcile. As 1959 progresses, Mussburger attempts suicide and is sent to an asylum, while Norville develops a new invention "for kids": another enigmatic circle on a folded sheet of paper that ultimately turns out to be a frisbee.

Cast

[edit]

Development

[edit]

Writing

[edit]

The Coen brothers first met Sam Raimi when Joel Coen worked as an assistant editor on Raimi's The Evil Dead (1981). Together, they began writing the script for The Hudsucker Proxy in 1981,[6] and continued during the filming of Crimewave (1985),[7] and post-production on Blood Simple (1984), during which Joel and Ethan Coen shared a house with Raimi. The Coens and Raimi were inspired by the films of Preston Sturges, such as Christmas in July (1940) and the Hollywood satire Sullivan's Travels (1941).[8] The sentimental tone and decency of ordinary men as heroes was influenced by films of Frank Capra, like Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936), Meet John Doe (1941), and It's a Wonderful Life (1946).[9] The dialogue is an homage to Howard Hawks' His Girl Friday (1940), while Jennifer Jason Leigh's performance as fast-talking reporter Amy Archer is reminiscent of Rosalind Russell and Katharine Hepburn, in both the physical and vocal mannerisms.[8] Other movies that observers found references to include Executive Suite (1954) and Sweet Smell of Success (1957).[10] The brothers had no intention of commenting on or parodying such movies. Instead, as Ethan said, "It's the case where, having seen those movies, we say 'They're really fun - let's do one'; as opposed to 'They're really fun- let's comment upon them.'" Raimi describes the script as "big-business comedy. It's a return to the very large love story comedies they used to make in the forties and early fifties."[11] So the brothers started to pace around their apartment, taking turns on the typewriter, and when they found themselves stuck at a point, Raimi would do all sorts of tricks to get the boys back up. For example, while Ethan is pacing around, he would move things around the apartment so Ethan would be thrown off, he even said he threw firecrackers at them.[11]

One film critic described the numerous influences: "From his infelicitous name to his physical clumsiness, Norville Barnes is a Preston Sturges hero trapped in a Frank Capra story, and never should that twain meet, especially not in a world that seems to have been created by Fritz Lang – the mechanistic monstrousness of the mailroom contrasted with the Bauhaus gigantism of the corporate offices perfectly matches the boss-labour split in Metropolis (1927)."[12] An interviewer proposed that the characters represent capitalism versus labour economics. Joel Coen replied: "Maybe the characters do embody those grand themes you mentioned, but that question is independent of whether or not we're interested in them – and we're not."[3] The Hudsucker Proxy presents various narrative motifs pertaining to the Rota Fortunae and visual motifs concerning the shape of circles. This includes Moses' monologue at the beginning, the Hudsucker Clock, Mussburger's wristwatch, the inventions of both the hula hoop and frisbee, as well as Norville and Amy's conversation about Karma.[10]

The first image the Coens and Raimi conceived was of Norville Barnes about to jump from the window of a skyscraper and then they had to figure out how he got there and how to save him.[13] The inclusion of the hula hoop came as a result of a plot device. Joel remembers, "We had to come up with something that Norville was going to invent that on the face of it was ridiculous. Something that would seem, by any sort of rational measure, to be doomed to failure, but something that on the other hand the audience already knew was going to be a phenomenal success."[12] Ethan said, "The whole circle motif was built into the design of the movie, and that just made it seem more appropriate."[12] Joel: "What grew out of that was the design element which drives the movie. The tension between vertical lines and circles; you have these tall buildings, then these circles everywhere which are echoed in the plot...in the structure of the movie itself. It starts with the end and circles back to the beginning, with a big flashback."[12] It took the Coens and Raimi three months to write the screenplay. As early as 1985, the Coens were quoted as saying that an upcoming project "takes place in the late Fifties in a skyscraper and is about Big Business. The characters talk fast and wear sharp clothes."[12]

Despite having finished the script in 1985, Joel explained, "We couldn't make Hudsucker back then because we weren't that popular yet. Plus, the script was too expensive and we had just completed Blood Simple, which was an independent film."[14] After completing Barton Fink (1991), the Coens were looking forward to doing a more mainstream film.[15] The Hudsucker Proxy was revived and the Coens and Raimi performed a brief rewrite. Producer Joel Silver, a fan of the Coens' previous films, acquired the script for his production company, Silver Pictures, and pitched the project at Warner Bros. Pictures. Silver also allowed the Coens complete artistic control.[13]

Production

[edit]

This was the first time the Coen brothers chose big stars to act in one of their films.[16] Joel Silver's first choice for Norville Barnes was Tom Cruise, but the Coens persisted in a desire to cast Tim Robbins.[17] Jon Cryer auditioned for the lead role of Norville Barnes.[18] Winona Ryder and Bridget Fonda were in competition for the role of Amy Archer, before Jennifer Jason Leigh was cast.[10][19] Leigh had previously auditioned for a role in the Coens's Miller's Crossing and Barton Fink; her failed auditions prompted the Coens to cast her in The Hudsucker Proxy.[14] To prepare for her role as Amy Archer, Leigh read the biographies of some of the most substantial ladies of the thirties and forties such as Rosalind Russell, Katharine Hepburn, and Jean Arthur.[11] When casting the role of Sidney Mussburger, "Warner Bros. suggested all sorts of names," remembered Joel. "A lot of them were comedians who were clearly wrong. Mussburger is the bad guy and Paul Newman brought that character to life."[14] However, the Coens first offered the role to Clint Eastwood, but he was forced to turn it down due to scheduling conflicts.[20] The Coens also offered their longtime friend Bruce Campbell an audition, but he initially refused, writing that "My history with the Coens spanned more than a decade...I would gladly and willingly accept the role, but these fellows knew my work well enough to spare me the audition." The Coens agreed and Campbell was offered, sans audition, the role of Smitty. Campbell was later effusive in his praise for the professionalism of the production and the other cast members, as well as being in awe that he was chosen to help Paul Newman rehearse before filming began.[21]

Once Newman and Robbins signed on, PolyGram Filmed Entertainment and Working Title Films agreed to co-finance the film with Warner Bros. and Silver Pictures.[22] The film was shot on five sound stages at Carolco Studios in Wilmington, North Carolina, beginning on November 30, 1992. Raimi served as second unit director, shooting the hula hoop sequence and Waring Hudsucker's suicide.[14] Production designer Dennis Gassner was influenced by fascist architecture, particularly the work of Albert Speer, as well as Terry Gilliam's Brazil (1985),[13] Frank Lloyd Wright and the Art Deco movement.[23] Gassner contemplated using five huge rooms needed to accommodate the sound stages. Gassner noted "You see, we wanted things to be big." He said that the huge 1950s-inspired table up in the boardroom was so long, it had to be built in five sections and later on assembled on the soundstage. The intention for the set sizes was to generate an oppressive feel.[16] Principal photography ended on March 18, 1993.[14]

In addition, numerous sequences were filmed in downtown Chicago, particularly in the Merchandise Mart building for the entrance and lobby to Hudsucker Industries and The Blackstone Hotel Christmas ballroom.[citation needed]

The presses in the News & Observer building in downtown Raleigh, North Carolina, appeared in the movie.[24]

Visual effects

[edit]

The visual effects supervisor was Michael J. McAlister (Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Willow) with Mark Stetson (Superman Returns, Peter Pan) as miniatures supervisor. Peter Chesney, mechanical effects designer on many Coen brothers films, created a pair of 16-foot angel wings for actor Charles Durning, who portrayed Waring Hudsucker. "I made a complicated steel armature with a lot of electric motors to time everything so he can fold up his wings, unfold them and flap them about. Then we covered them with real duck and turkey feathers," says Chesney. "We modeled them after photographs of a hovering dove landing in slow motion."[25] The buildings in the background (designed by McAlister and Stetson) were 1:24 scale models, shot separately and merged in post-production. To lengthen the sequence, the model of the Hudsucker building was the equivalent of 90 stories, not 45.[26]

Despite the New York City setting, additional skyscrapers in Chicago, Illinois, provided inspiration for the opening sequence of the skyline, such as the Merchandise Mart and Aon Center. Skyscrapers from New York City included the Chanin Building, the Fred F. French Building and One Wall Street, Manhattan. "We took all our favorite buildings in New York from where they actually stood and sort of put them into one neighborhood," Gassner continued, "a fantasy vision which adds to the atmosphere and flavor." First of all, a model had to be created based on the fantasy 1950s New York for the opening shot. So a miniature city was created, as McAlister mentioned that the Coens did not want a realistic reproduction of 1950s New York skyline, instead they wanted a more stylized version of it.[16] So Gassner used the book New York in The Forties as a reference to create the look for the cityscape. It took three months and 27 crew members to create the miniature city at the scale of 24:1. As for the Hudsucker building, they made it at the scale of 6:1 for closer shots including the long-zoom in of Norville at the beginning. For that scene to be created, it started off with a wide-angle shot, moving closer towards Tim Robbins, who was standing in a full sized set, which they inserted inside the shot of the model clock. "Marrying a live-action image with a painted or miniature element was, of course, nothing new, however, in the case of the zoom-in on Robbins from such a distance, keeping the full-size set locked in with the model building, that was state-of-the-art and the only way to do it was with computers," says McAlister.[16] Most of the buildings were created with two sides only, as they are seen from only the front and the side, and some needed only one side, as they were seen from only the front, while the Hudsucker building was made completely three-dimensional.[16][23] The work of The Computer Film Company (supervised by Janek Sirrs) included manipulations of the zoom-in shot of Norville at the beginning, as well as CGI snow and composites of the falling sequences.[23]

To create the two suicide falls, the miniature New York set was hung sideways to allow full movement along the heights of the buildings. McAlister calculated that such a drop would take seven seconds, but for dramatic purposes it was extended to around thirty. Problems occurred when the Coens and cinematographer Roger Deakins decided that these shots would be more effective with a wide-angle lens. "The buildings had been designed for an 18 mm lens, but as we tried a 14 mm lens, and then a 10 mm, we liked the shots more and more."[23] However, the wider amount of vision meant that the edges of the frame went beyond the fringes of the model city, leaving empty spaces with no buildings. In the end, extra buildings were created from putting the one-sided buildings together and placing them at the edges. Charles Durning's fall was shot conventionally, but because Tim Robbins had to stop abruptly at the camera, his was shot in reverse as he was pulled away from the camera.[23]

The skyscraper models created for The Hudsucker Proxy were re-used for The Shadow, Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, and Godzilla.[27]

Inspirations

[edit]

It is thought that the inspiration for the scene in which CEO Waring Hudsucker jumps to his death from the company's building was inspired by the real-life suicide of Eli Black, former chairman of United Brands, in 1975.[28]

Soundtrack

[edit]
Original Motion Picture Soundtrack: The Hudsucker Proxy
Soundtrack album by
ReleasedMarch 15, 1994
GenreFilm score
Length29:28
LabelVarèse Sarabande
Coen Brothers film soundtracks chronology
Barton Fink
(1991)
Original Motion Picture Soundtrack: The Hudsucker Proxy
(1994)
Fargo
(1996)
Professional ratings
Review scores
SourceRating
AllMusic link

The score to The Hudsucker Proxy was written by Carter Burwell, the fifth of his collaborations with the Coen Brothers. "Adagio of Spartacus and Phrygia" from Aram Khachaturian's ballet Spartacus is the basis of the main theme and additional music from the ballet runs under the Hula-Hoop sequence. The popular music of the time is also reflected in the character of Vic Tenetta (Peter Gallagher), modeled after Dean Martin, who sings "Memories Are Made of This." Additional inspiration comes from Khachaturian's Gayane suite. A section from the ballet is used by Burwell for the scene in which Norville and Amy meet for the first time. The composer's "Dance of the Young Mountaineers" is used when a young boy is the first to try the hula hoop, followed by "Sabre Dance" (both from Gayane).[23]

Release

[edit]

Commercial reception

[edit]

Warner Bros. held test screenings and audience comments were largely mixed. The studio suggested re-shoots, but the Coens, who held final cut privilege, refused because they were very nervous working with their biggest budget to date and were eager for mainstream success. The producers eventually added footage that had been cut and also shot minor pick-ups for the ending.[14] Variety claimed that the pick-ups were done to try to save the film because Warner feared it was going to be a box office bomb. Joel Coen addressed the issue in an interview: "First of all, they weren't reshoots. They were a little bit of additional footage. We wanted to shoot a fight scene at the end of the movie. It was the product of something we discovered editing the movie, not previewing it. We've done additional shooting on every movie, so it's normal."[14]

The film premiered in January 1994 at the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah.[29] In addition, The Hudsucker Proxy opened the 1994 Cannes Film Festival[30] on May 12, 1994. The film was in competition for the Palme d'Or, but lost to Pulp Fiction.[31] The Hudsucker Proxy was released on March 11, 1994, and only grossed $2,816,518 in the United States and Canada.[32] Worldwide, it grossed $11.3 million.[4] The production budget was officially set at $25 million,[14] although, it was reported to have increased to $40 million for marketing and promotion purposes. The film was a box office bomb.[8]

Critical response

[edit]

In addition to the film under-performing at the box office, The Hudsucker Proxy opened to mixed reviews from critics. On Rotten Tomatoes 63% of reviews from 52 critics were positive, with an average rating of 6.6/10. The site's consensus states, "Intriguingly strange and visually distinctive, The Hudsucker Proxy is ultimately almost – but not quite – as smart and absorbing as it needs to be."[33]

Roger Ebert praised the production design, scale model work, matte paintings, cinematography, and characters. "But the problem with the movie is that it's all surface and no substance," Ebert wrote. "Not even the slightest attempt is made to suggest that the film takes its own story seriously. Everything is style. The performances seem deliberately angled as satire."[34] Desson Thomson of The Washington Post described The Hudsucker Proxy as being "pointlessly flashy and compulsively overloaded with references to films of the 1930s. Missing in this film's performances is a sense of humanity, the crucial ingredient in the movies Hudsucker is clearly trying to evoke. Hudsucker isn't the real thing at all. It's just a proxy."[35]

John Simon of National Review described The Hudsucker Proxy as "asinine and insufferable".[36]

Todd McCarthy, writing in Variety, called the film "one of the most inspired and technically stunning pastiches of old Hollywood pictures ever to come out of the New Hollywood. But a pastiche it remains, as nearly everything in the Coen brothers' latest and biggest film seems like a wizardly but artificial synthesis, leaving a hole in the middle where some emotion and humanity should be."[37] James Berardinelli gave a largely positive review. "The Hudsucker Proxy skewers Big Business on the same shaft that Robert Altman ran Hollywood through with The Player. From the Brazil-like scenes in the cavernous mail room to the convoluted machinations in the board room, this film is pure satire of the nastiest and most enjoyable sort. In this surreal world of 1958 can be found many of the issues confronting large corporations in the 1990s, all twisted to match the filmmakers' vision."[38]

Warner Home Video released The Hudsucker Proxy on DVD on May 18, 1999. No featurettes were included.[39] It was one of the first Blu-ray Disc titles released through the Warner Archive Collection on February 26, 2013, but it still lacked any featurettes.[40]

Two decades after the film's release, Scout Tafoya of RogerEbert.com praised the film for its stylistic adventurousness and expansion upon the themes and concepts of the films that inspired it. "Whereas the comedies of the 1930s and '40s could talk quickly and move quickly, they couldn't run at a full gallop like the Coen Brothers. Their camera soars, traveling at the speed of progress, gossip, capitalism itself. Everything races at top speed. The production design, the one thing everyone felt comfortable praising, is a marvel. Every frame doubles as a survey of early modern art, from Art Deco to Futurism."[41]

Year-end lists

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ "The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)". BBFC. Retrieved 2 May 2021.
  2. ^ "The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)". Film & TV Database. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 29 January 2009. Retrieved 17 April 2012 – via bfi.org.uk.
  3. ^ a b Bergan, pp. 24, 36
  4. ^ a b "World's Champs & Chumps". Variety. February 13, 1995. p. 7.
  5. ^ https://www.nathanrabin.com/happy-place/2024/3/1/the-coen-brothers-transcendently-nasty-1994-cult-classic-the-hudsucker-proxy-is-a-movie-to-get-lost-in
  6. ^ Muir, p. 77
  7. ^ Warren, pp. 101–102
  8. ^ a b c Levin, pp. 103–118
  9. ^ Agostinelli, Alessandro. Un mondo perfetto. I comandamenti dei fratelli Coen (in Italian). Controluce. p. 111.
  10. ^ a b c Mottram, pp. 93–113
  11. ^ a b c Levine, Josh (2000). The Coen Brothers, The Story of Two American Filmmakers. United States: ECW. ISBN 1-55022-424-7.
  12. ^ a b c d e Woods, pp. 125–135
  13. ^ a b c Bergan, pp. 148–162
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h Woods, pp. 9–10, 122–124
  15. ^ Juliann Garey (1993-02-05). "Coen to Extremes". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
  16. ^ a b c d e Robson, Eddie (2007). Coen Brothers. Virgin Book.
  17. ^ Anne Thompson (2007-11-15). "Coen brothers keep it real". Variety. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
  18. ^ Cryer, Jon (5 April 2016). So That Happened: A Memoir. Penguin Publishing. ISBN 9780451472366.
  19. ^ Winona Ryder reveals Jeff Bridges ‘refused’ to kiss her in an audition due to age difference
  20. ^ Leonard Klady (1993-07-13). "DeVito looking to get 'Shorty' into production". Variety. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
  21. ^ Campbell, Bruce. If Chins Could Kill (pp. 311-312). St. Martin's Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
  22. ^ Nisid Hajari (1994-04-01). "Beavis and Egghead". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
  23. ^ a b c d e f Robson, pp. 139–142
  24. ^ Cain, Brooke (2011-11-09). "Hollywood comes to downtown Raleigh today". News & Observer. Archived from the original on 2011-11-11. Retrieved 2011-11-09.
  25. ^ Staff (1993-01-18). "Hollywood's still playing for effect". Variety. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
  26. ^ George Mannes (1994-04-15). "The 'Hud' Thud". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
  27. ^ Cinefex Magazine, issues 63 (Sept 1995), 71 (Sept 1997), and 74 (July 1998).
  28. ^ Kihss, Peter (February 4, 1975). "44-Story Plunge Kills Head of United Brands". The New York Times. Retrieved March 20, 2020.
  29. ^ Caryn James (1994-01-25). "Critic's Notebook; For Sundance, Struggle to Survive Success". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-04-11.
  30. ^ "Festival de Cannes: The Hudsucker Proxy". festival-cannes.com. Retrieved 2009-08-27.
  31. ^ Staff (1994-04-21). "Euro pix man Cannes". Variety. Retrieved 2008-11-21.
  32. ^ "The Hudsucker Proxy". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2008-11-17.
  33. ^ "The Hudsucker Proxy". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2024-02-29.
  34. ^ Roger Ebert (1994-05-25). "The Hudsucker Proxy". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved 2008-11-20.
  35. ^ Desson Thomson (1994-03-25). "The Hudsucker Proxy". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-11-20.
  36. ^ Simon, John (2005). John Simon on Film: Criticism 1982-2001. Applause Books. p. 493.
  37. ^ Todd McCarthy (1994-01-31). "The Hudsucker Proxy". Variety. Retrieved 2008-11-20.
  38. ^ James Berardinelli. "The Hudsucker Proxy". ReelViews.net. Retrieved 2008-11-20.
  39. ^ "The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)". Amazon.com. 18 May 1999. Retrieved 2008-11-20.
  40. ^ "The Warner Archives Collection Announces First MOD Blu-rays". High-Def Digest. November 16, 2012. Retrieved 2013-09-08.
  41. ^ The Unloved, Part 3 : "The Hudsucker Proxy" Tofoya, Scout. 1 February 2014.
  42. ^ Hunter, Stephen (December 25, 1994). "Films worthy of the title 'best' in short supply MOVIES". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  43. ^ Davis, Sandi (January 1, 1995). "Oklahoman Movie Critics Rank Their Favorites for the Year "Forrest Gump" The Very Best, Sandi Declares". The Oklahoman. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  44. ^ P. Means, Sean (January 1, 1995). "'Pulp and Circumstance' After the Rise of Quentin Tarantino, Hollywood Would Never Be the Same". The Salt Lake Tribune (Final ed.). p. E1.
  45. ^ Arnold, William (December 30, 1994). "'94 Movies: Best and Worst". Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Final ed.). p. 20.
  46. ^ Clark, Mike (December 28, 1994). "Scoring with true life, 'True Lies' and 'Fiction.'". USA Today (Final ed.). p. 5D.
  47. ^ Lovell, Glenn (December 25, 1994). "The Past Picture Show the Good, the Bad and the Ugly -- a Year Worth's of Movie Memories". San Jose Mercury News (Morning Final ed.). p. 3.

General bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]