Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shajaan Muaz Shaheem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Ahmed Haitham. ✗plicit 11:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Shajaan Muaz Shaheem

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Shajaan Muaz Shaheem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, lacks more reliable sources. I don't think greatbusinessexchange.co.uk and open.endole.co.uk are reliable sources. Plus, being a wife of an MP doesn't make the person notable. The article has only one sentence. Also, Secretary General of the organization is just a normal job and isn't a notable position. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 10:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

I updated most of the cites which was cleared out from the article while someone else edited it and also found resources on Mary Robinson climate justice award and one young world too, but as its not my targeted development I haven't put any of this and just cited and it was deleted, concentrating mostly on the attacks concerning the subject during her pregnancy which related to the parliamentarian and his tenure as that develops. NormadicEditor (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

https://avas.mv/108984 https://ras.mv/post/13249https://dhen.mv/94568https://dhauru.com/post/news/1702https://feshun.mv/128075https://adhadhu.com/article/12638https://dhen.mv/33092https://ras.mv/post/17564https://sangu.mv/33077/https://www.furathama.com/2698/https://www.furathama.com/2698/https://feshun.mv/131777https://cnm.mv/news/19111https://mihaaru.com/news/81675https://mihaaru.com/news/81675https://staging.mihaaru.com/news/99461https://adhadhu.com/article/12638https://avas.mv/101312https://avas.mv/101312https://dhauru.com/post/news/1702https://dhiyares.com/30822https://www.furathama.com/2698/https://dhauru.com/post/news/1681https://sun.mv/158306https://sun.mv/158306https://mihaaru.com/news/81675https://www.psmnews.mv/87258https://sun.mv/158320https://cnm.mv/news/34477https://cnm.mv/news/34477https://ramazan.mihaaru.com/ramazan/99436https://en.sun.mv/67112https://english.sun.mv/69969https://en.thepress.mv/13387

So this article was actually being developed due to these, I understand the positions mentioned doesn't make the person notable,( I didn't have much information on the individual than those three positions to describe the lead) but the saga surrounding these cites was the main notability of the article, because this subjected to life threatening circumstances also due to it immense coverage and by news platforms. NormadicEditor (talk) 11:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

All those citations are about the couple's marriage, "MP Haitham has married", and the couple receiving a attack. That doesn't mean the wife is notable. Notability is on what the person has done. Eg: A notable job, a profession, occupation etc.. The article could be made a redirect to her husband's article "Ahmed Haitham" instead and make a "Personal life" section. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 11:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that’s exactly what I was trying to express but wasn’t sure how to phrase it. I even considered whether Wikipedia has a personal template on another’s data page or something similar. The subject has notable positions but non was on the news articles but mostly on edu websites and academia which doesn't qualify for the wiki guidelines and the feline welfare part I concentrated due to the huge media coverage surrounding the organisation and its notable work for stray cats, Could you also help me with creating a redirect article? I’m not very familiar with the process. Thanks again for all your help! :) NormadicEditor (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

I finally figured out how the redirect works! Wikipedia has been a bit tricky for me (clearly, I need to ditch my jour-no habits). Thanks for teaching me something new today , you’re a true Wikipedia mentor! Now, what should we do with the delete template? NormadicEditor (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Advertising, and Maldives. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect: to Ahmed Haitham. Unilandofma^{(Talk to me!)} 14:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect: to the spouse's page seems fine. Most of what's used for sourcing doesn't show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect: to the spouses page, i believe this page to be edited better, starting from the picture to the persons work flow, she is a environmental activist and also was the first regional director of the maldives business award which is also the first business award ever held in maldives, these citations and accomplishments of the indiviual has been clearly not citated and the page lacks weight due to that, also she is published in the international ocean journal through resilience maldives where she is the founder, also one young world where she is the compliance to maldivian environment and stewardship program (which is also first of its kind) also she obtained this through winning mary robinson climate justice award in 2019. she deserves a wikipedia page but not this one! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pettylittlething (talk • contribs) 17:18, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

  Those citations are on edu, orgs and certainly places like linkedn and wikipedia doesn't allow most of those. NormadicEditor (talk) 17:37, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.