Talk:Google Scholar: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edit by 102.89.47.181 (talk) to last version by 124.105.80.172 |
m Reverted edit by 103.248.222.179 (talk) to last version by HaeB |
||
(54 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Bibliographies |importance=Top}} |
{{WikiProject Bibliographies |importance=Top}} |
||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
{{WikiProject Academic Journals }} |
{{WikiProject Academic Journals }} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{refideas|1=http://www.nature.com/news/google-scholar-pioneer-on-search-engine-s-future-1.16269 |
{{refideas|1=http://www.nature.com/news/google-scholar-pioneer-on-search-engine-s-future-1.16269 |
||
|2= |
|2= |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be ''highly'' biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:131.202.42.70|131.202.42.70]] ([[User talk:131.202.42.70|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/131.202.42.70|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small> |
:I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be ''highly'' biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:131.202.42.70|131.202.42.70]] ([[User talk:131.202.42.70|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/131.202.42.70|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small> |
||
== Search engine optimization for Google Scholar == |
|||
== "Google Scholar and academic libraries" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
Is the section Search engine optimization for Google Scholar really required or useful? I don't believe so, but I would like to consult other Wikipedians first. [[User:Icandostuff|<span style="color:Red">I</span> <span style="color:Yellow">can</span> <span style="color:Lime">do</span> <span style="color:#00ffff">stuff</span><span style="color:Blue">!</span> ]] ([[User talk:Icandostuff|talk]]) 18:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Google Scholar and academic libraries]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Google Scholar and academic libraries]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote -->  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">[[User:Headbomb|Headbomb]] {[[User talk:Headbomb|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Headbomb|c]] · [[WP:PHYS|p]] · [[WP:WBOOKS|b]]}</span> 02:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:The section appears to mix up two different topics: citation-ranking manipulation (mostly sourced here in a form that concerns individual authors, although publisher manipulation may also be a concern) and making content discoverable by journal publishers. Some properly sourced guidance on discoverability may be relevant here. I think citation manipulation is a broader topic than for Google Scholar specifically, and may be better placed elsewhere. In any case these two topics should be treated separately rather than as one thing. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Edit notice == |
|||
I just added an edit notice (a standardized one, from a template) telling people not to post their search queries here. There have been 14 of those since last June, which together with their removals has constituted the entirety of recent changes to this talk page. It's too much. I'm not optimistic that the people clueless enough to put their queries here will read the notice but maybe it will help. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Related literature about Effects of social media on self esteem 2017 to 2024 == |
|||
:How does this happen? 1 of 100 people looking for Google Scholar on Google clicks the second hit instead of the first, and then 1 of 100 of such people thinks that clicking on "Talk" and posting here is the way to go? [[User:Biologos|Biologos]] ([[User talk:Biologos|talk]]) 11:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Research [[Special:Contributions/124.105.80.172|124.105.80.172]] ([[User talk:124.105.80.172|talk]]) 11:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::I guess. The big bold edit notice doesn't seem to be helping much, anyway. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:53, 25 December 2024
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Google Scholar. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Google Scholar at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 555 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Not as good as described in this article
It seems that google scholar is not as good as described in this article. A perfect paper on the subject matter is written here You can check it out for yourself, what is written is really true. Would it thus be possible to include a milder version of my critic on this wikipedia page, like it exists in the German version of this article, without having it deleted? I thank you in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.39.218.10 (talk • contribs) .
- The German article referred to is aat http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar
- would 194.39.218.10 please give some contact information? ---
- I found that your article was somewhat informative. However, it seemed to be highly biased against Google Scholar by blasting it at every opportunity. An example: "The "Googlemania" fueled by the enormous media publicity and laymen's ecstasy rubs off on Google Scholar and makes otherwise learned people disregard reality." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.202.42.70 (talk • contribs) .
Search engine optimization for Google Scholar
Is the section Search engine optimization for Google Scholar really required or useful? I don't believe so, but I would like to consult other Wikipedians first. I can do stuff! (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The section appears to mix up two different topics: citation-ranking manipulation (mostly sourced here in a form that concerns individual authors, although publisher manipulation may also be a concern) and making content discoverable by journal publishers. Some properly sourced guidance on discoverability may be relevant here. I think citation manipulation is a broader topic than for Google Scholar specifically, and may be better placed elsewhere. In any case these two topics should be treated separately rather than as one thing. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Edit notice
I just added an edit notice (a standardized one, from a template) telling people not to post their search queries here. There have been 14 of those since last June, which together with their removals has constituted the entirety of recent changes to this talk page. It's too much. I'm not optimistic that the people clueless enough to put their queries here will read the notice but maybe it will help. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- How does this happen? 1 of 100 people looking for Google Scholar on Google clicks the second hit instead of the first, and then 1 of 100 of such people thinks that clicking on "Talk" and posting here is the way to go? Biologos (talk) 11:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I guess. The big bold edit notice doesn't seem to be helping much, anyway. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Bibliographies articles
- Top-importance Bibliographies articles
- WikiProject Bibliographies
- C-Class Websites articles
- High-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of High-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class science articles
- Low-importance science articles
- C-Class Google articles
- Mid-importance Google articles
- WikiProject Google articles
- C-Class Academic Journal articles
- WikiProject Academic Journal articles