Talk:Henry George: Difference between revisions
→Henry George's First Book: new section |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Henry George/Archive 1) (bot |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|blp=no|listas=George, Henry|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Biography|s&a-work-group=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|importance=high}} |
||
⚫ | |||
|living=no |
|||
⚫ | |||
|class=B |
|||
⚫ | |||
|s&a-work-group=yes |
|||
⚫ | |||
|listas=George, Henry |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Journalism}} |
{{WikiProject Journalism}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Social scientists|class=B}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| algo = old(365d) |
| algo = old(365d) |
||
Line 26: | Line 20: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== |
== Henry George's First Book == |
||
He was so great, why not use the following image/portrait of him?: |
|||
It was titled "Our Land and National Policy" and actually the first book that he wrote which also proposed a tax on land values. This is not generally appreciated. It was published in 1871. [[User:Macrocompassion|Macrocompassion]] ([[User talk:Macrocompassion|talk]]) 14:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
https://www.famouseconomists.net/images/henry-george.jpg <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.167.126.25|71.167.126.25]] ([[User talk:71.167.126.25#top|talk]]) 15:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== |
== Henry George and Karl Marx == |
||
I find that comparing George to his contemporaries and offering more historical context is illuminating, though perhaps too speculative or original to be included in the Wikipedia article about him. |
|||
I added a source for Smith, Ricardo, Proudhon, and Lasalle being influences, and it is all the same source, but the way I did it now ends up with it being listed 4 times in the sources, with 4 different numbers, and I don't know how to fix it so that the source just shows up once and the correct number-reference for it shows up at each of the appropriate places. |
|||
George is described as being a Lincoln Republican at one point. Lincoln read and admired Marx. Marx was widely read via his long running and popular English language column in the New York Tribune, one of the world's most popular newspapers at the time. It's very possible that Lincoln read these columns (Lincoln doesn't appear to have had much of a personal library), though many radical German and Prussian socialist and marxist immigrants also fought brilliantly for the Union (ex: Gen. August Willich) with whom Lincoln is also likely to have had some contact. |
|||
I'm also not entirely sure if I formatted the source/reference correctly. |
|||
George seems to have been a type setter at a major US newspaper at the same time as Marx's column. His claim that he didn't read Marx is curious. Maybe he meant he hadn't read Capital, which isn't an easy read. It's also interesting that George's position (or lack thereof) on the politically dominant issue of the US Civil War isn't mentioned. |
|||
If anyone could fix this, or tell me how to fix it, it would be greatly appreciated. [[Special:Contributions/217.105.19.119|217.105.19.119]] ([[User talk:217.105.19.119|talk]]) 19:17, 12 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
As for Marx's opinion of George and Georgism- |
|||
:{{Done}} The citation tag has been properly formatted and consolidated. Thank you for adding it. [[User:A. Randomdude0000|A. Randomdude0000]] ([[User talk:A. Randomdude0000|talk]]) 20:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
"Conceding that George was "a writer of talent," Marx insisted that '*the man is in theory completely *behind the times. ' He understands nothing of the nature of surplus value." |
|||
== Henry George's First Book == |
|||
"Karl Marx considered the single-tax platform as a regression from the transition to communism and referred to Georgism as "capitalism's last ditch". [[User:Fieldlab|Fieldlab]] ([[User talk:Fieldlab|talk]]) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:19, 27 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Henry George article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Henry George's First Book
[edit]It was titled "Our Land and National Policy" and actually the first book that he wrote which also proposed a tax on land values. This is not generally appreciated. It was published in 1871. Macrocompassion (talk) 14:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Henry George and Karl Marx
[edit]I find that comparing George to his contemporaries and offering more historical context is illuminating, though perhaps too speculative or original to be included in the Wikipedia article about him.
George is described as being a Lincoln Republican at one point. Lincoln read and admired Marx. Marx was widely read via his long running and popular English language column in the New York Tribune, one of the world's most popular newspapers at the time. It's very possible that Lincoln read these columns (Lincoln doesn't appear to have had much of a personal library), though many radical German and Prussian socialist and marxist immigrants also fought brilliantly for the Union (ex: Gen. August Willich) with whom Lincoln is also likely to have had some contact.
George seems to have been a type setter at a major US newspaper at the same time as Marx's column. His claim that he didn't read Marx is curious. Maybe he meant he hadn't read Capital, which isn't an easy read. It's also interesting that George's position (or lack thereof) on the politically dominant issue of the US Civil War isn't mentioned.
As for Marx's opinion of George and Georgism-
"Conceding that George was "a writer of talent," Marx insisted that '*the man is in theory completely *behind the times. ' He understands nothing of the nature of surplus value."
"Karl Marx considered the single-tax platform as a regression from the transition to communism and referred to Georgism as "capitalism's last ditch". Fieldlab (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Pennsylvania articles
- High-importance Pennsylvania articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- B-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- B-Class Economics articles
- High-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- B-Class Libertarianism articles
- Mid-importance Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Philadelphia articles
- High-importance Philadelphia articles
- Automatically assessed Philadelphia articles
- B-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles