Jump to content

Talk:Aluminium: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
(66 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Science|class=GA}}
{{Warning|'''For discussion regarding spelling please use [[Talk:Aluminium/Spelling]].'''}}
{{Warning|'''For discussion regarding spelling please use [[Talk:Aluminium/Spelling]].'''}}
{{American English|IUPAC = yes}}
{{Article history
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1=GAN
Line 23: Line 23:
|currentstatus=GA
|currentstatus=GA
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|vital=yes|class=GA|1=
{{WikiProject Elements|class=GA|importance=Top|vital=yes}}
{{WikiProject Elements|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|class=GA|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Materials|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Materials|class=GA|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Rocks and minerals|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Rocks and minerals|importance=Low}}
}}{{section size}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Aluminium|from_oldid=809615867|to=History of aluminium|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=History_of_aluminium&oldid=809616178}}
{{American English|IUPAC = yes}}

{{Spoken Wikipedia request|Catfurball|Important}}
{{Spoken Wikipedia request|Catfurball|Important}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 125K
|maxarchivesize = 125K
|counter = 3
|counter = 4
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
Line 40: Line 41:
|archive = Talk:Aluminium/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Aluminium/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Aluminium|from_oldid=809615867|to=History of aluminium|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=History_of_aluminium&oldid=809616178}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{Archive box|auto=long|bot=MiszaBot|age=6|units=months}}
{{Archive box|auto=long|bot=MiszaBot|age=6|units=months}}
{{Archive box|title=Spelling archives|auto=long|root=Talk:Aluminium/Spelling|search=no|Please, start new discussions about spelling at [[/Spelling]].}}
{{Archive box|title=Spelling archives|auto=long|root=Talk:Aluminium/Spelling|search=no|Please, start new discussions about spelling at [[/Spelling]].}}


== Semi-protected edit request on 10 October 2022 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2024 ==


{{Edit semi-protected|Aluminium|answered=yes}}
{{edit semi-protected|Aluminium|answered=yes}}
The boiling point of Aluminum is stated to be 2743 K but it should be 2793 K.
change: Appearance silvery gray metallic
Sources:
Change to: Appearance shiny gray metallic [[User:VeryBigBean|VeryBigBean]] ([[User talk:VeryBigBean|talk]]) 08:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
[https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/inchi?ID=C7429905&Mask=4#ref-1 NIST]
[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00503647 This paper] [[User:Seeenman|Seeenman]] ([[User talk:Seeenman|talk]]) 05:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Seeenman}} {{not done}}. That 2743 K value comes from this<ref>{{cite journal |doi= 10.1021/je1011086 |title=Corrected Values for Boiling Points and Enthalpies of Vaporization of Elements in Handbooks |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231538496 |last1=Zhang |first1=Yiming |last2=Evans |first2=Julian R. G. |last3=Yang |first3=Shoufeng |journal=J. Chem. Eng. Data |year=2011 |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=328–337}}</ref>, which is newer (2011) than the sources you given (1987–1988). --[[User:Nucleus hydro elemon|Nucleus hydro elemon]] ([[User talk:Nucleus hydro elemon|talk]]) 15:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
::Ah thanks. Perhaps that could be added as a reference on the page? Something like
::2743 K ​(2470 °C, ​4478 °F)<ref>{{cite journal |doi= 10.1021/je1011086 |title=Corrected Values for Boiling Points and Enthalpies of Vaporization of Elements in Handbooks |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231538496 |last1=Zhang |first1=Yiming |last2=Evans |first2=Julian R. G. |last3=Yang |first3=Shoufeng |journal=J. Chem. Eng. Data |year=2011 |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=328–337}}</ref> [[User:Seeenman|Seeenman]] ([[User talk:Seeenman|talk]]) 16:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
:::{{done}} [[User:Nucleus hydro elemon|Nucleus hydro elemon]] ([[User talk:Nucleus hydro elemon|talk]]) 22:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
::::Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/169.233.202.227|169.233.202.227]] ([[User talk:169.233.202.227|talk]]) 22:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}}
:I'm not sure. [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Zinc&diff=prev&oldid=1115204208&diffmode=source Here] at [[zinc]] the same edit was made. But IMO a "[[Silver (color)]]" is not exactly [[silver]] itself, and a good & acceptable way to describe the color/shine. [[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 09:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
::
::As well as I know it, aluminium is rare in its ability to look silvery as a fine powder. That is, you can make a paint out of it that looks silvery. Others look dark gray or black as a fine powder. More often, we see sheets or foils, but which one should apply here? [[User:Gah4|Gah4]] ([[User talk:Gah4|talk]]) 16:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting comment.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Note:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Procedurally marking [[WP:ER|edit request]] as answered as there is (albeit now stale) a discussion amonst multiple editors regarding the proposed change. —[[User:Sirdog|<span style="color:#058700">'''Sirdog'''</span> ]]([[User talk:Sirdog|talk]]) 09:40, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


== reference removed, mouse≠person ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2022 ==


ref name="Ullmann" does not support "[[Aluminium sulfate]] has an [[Median lethal dose|LD<sub>50</sub>]] of 6207 mg/kg (oral, mouse), which corresponds to 435 grams (about one pound) for a 70 kg (150 lb) person." I've also changed person to mouse because toxicity is different in different species.
{{edit semi-protected|Aluminium|answered=yes}}
change pronunciation of US/CA spelling from /əˈljuːmɪnəm/ ə-LEW-min-əm to /əˈluːmɪnəm/ ə-LOO-min-əm [[User:Ocelots33|Ocelots33]] ([[User talk:Ocelots33|talk]]) 01:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
<references /> [[User:Darsie42|Darsie42]] ([[User talk:Darsie42|talk]]) 10:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> {{re|Ocelots33}} What's your source for it being such a fronted ''l'' sound? —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 02:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
::https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aluminum lists it without the /j/ sound, and the wikipedia audio sample says it without the /j/ sound. The OED lists the /j/ as optional in British English (which typically uses aluminium anyway) and does not list /j/ at all in American English https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/5898 [[User:Ocelots33|Ocelots33]] ([[User talk:Ocelots33|talk]]) 20:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
:::{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Part of the problem is my native dialect is a [[yod-dropping]] dialect, so in trying to distinguish ''lj'' and ''l'', I wasn't hearing the yod sound in ''lute'' and was missing the difference. Looks like it's been done at the infobox. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 21:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


:Unfortunately this leaves us trying to imagine a 70kg mouse. Perhaps it would be better to remove the relative clause entirely. [[Special:Contributions/80.6.246.2|80.6.246.2]] ([[User talk:80.6.246.2|talk]]) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
== British fanfic spelling ==
::I agree that extrapolating cross-species without a direct cite is a problem ([[WP:OR]]). Just state the LD50 as the ref supports it. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 18:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2024 ==
Why does the page list the British fanfic spelling as the primary spelling? The official recognized spelling is aluminum and should be recognized as such. [[Special:Contributions/73.237.36.27|73.237.36.27]] ([[User talk:73.237.36.27|talk]]) 17:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
: See FAQ [[Talk:Aluminium/Spelling |here]] --[[User:McSly|McSly]] ([[User talk:McSly|talk]]) 17:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
::Umm, because the internationally recognised spelling is 'aluminium' and only Canada and the US spell it 'aluminum'. [[User:TrevorLenab|TrevorLenab]] ([[User talk:TrevorLenab|talk]]) 13:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
== Requested move 14 April 2023 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Aluminium|answered=yes}}
{{requested move/dated|Aluminum}}
In the section titled "Earth" under the natural occurrence tab it's stated that "Aluminium also occurs in seawater at a concentration of 2 μg/kg." when I went to the referenced material [33] I wasn't able to find that value. If this could be double checked and adjusted if need be, that would be great. I also got a separate average concentration of sea water as 0.42 µg/L with a standard deviation of 0.70 µg/L (or 0.41 µg/kg with a standard deviation of 0.68 µg/kg) from a more recent study in 2020.(https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00468/full#T2) These values can be found on table two and are measured in nanomoles, but should convert over. [[User:Xcl-aspiringscientist|Xcl-aspiringscientist]] ([[User talk:Xcl-aspiringscientist|talk]]) 03:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)


:{{Done}}, cheers for doing the converting [[User:Cmrc23|<span style="text-shadow: -1px -1px 2px #fee6b8, 1px -1px 2px #fedd63, -1px 1px 2px #d56300, 1px 1px 2px #623804; color: #4a2a02;">'''Cmrc23''' ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ</span>]] 09:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[[:Aluminium]] → {{no redirect|Aluminum}} – "Aluminum" is the more common name, as shown with [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Aluminum%2C+Aluminium&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=true this ngram]. Thoughts? [[User:Wikiexplorationandhelping|Wikiexplorationandhelping]] ([[User talk:Wikiexplorationandhelping|talk]]) 19:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


== [[Reynolds Wrap]] ==
*'''Comment''' – While "aluminum" is definitely more common, the reason why it's located at "aluminium" is because of the IUPAC. Like, there's three elements with two region-centric names/spellings: "Alumin(i)um", "Sul[f/ph]ur", and "C(a)esium". The IUPAC established the standard that the British spelling should be used for "Alumin'''ium'''" (and "'''Caes'''ium") while the American spelling should be used for "Sul'''fur'''". Also, see [[MOS:SPELLING]]. <small>[[User:Paintspot|Paintspot Infez]] ([[User talk:Paintspot|talk]])</small> 21:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Is it sold in England? If so, which way do they label it? ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] <sup>''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]''</sup> [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 03:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
*'''Don't move''' This is a english-american spelling difference. Whichever whichever dialect has more prominence is always going to win the "more common" criterion. If that was sufficient argument for a move on its own the entire wiki would use American spelling sooner or later. I don't believe that's what policy prescribes. --[[User:Licks-rocks|Licks-rocks]] ([[User talk:Licks-rocks#top|talk]]) 21:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per [[MOS:ENGVAR]] / [[MOS:RETAIN]] / [[User:Licks-rocks|Licks-rocks]] / [[Talk:Aluminium/Spelling]]. —⁠ ⁠[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 22:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' A compromise has been already hashed out at IUPAC and elsewhere long before Wikipedia existed. Attempting to defy it to restart the debate from scratch is not worth anyone's time. — ''Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung'', ''[[User:Mellohi!|mello]]'''''[[User talk:Mellohi!|hi!]]''' ([[Special:Contributions/Mellohi!|投稿]]) 03:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Strong oppose''' per others. It's not an American element. See [[WP:ALUM]] for the clearly-specified WP standard based on [[IUPAC]] authority. [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 03:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' per [[WP:ALUM]] (=MOS): IUPAC-defined spelling in chemical usage. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 05:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' per [[WP:ALUM]]. <b>[[User talk:Praseodymium-141|<span style="color:#028A0F"><sup>141</sup></span>]][[User:Praseodymium-141|<span style="color:#A32CC4">Pr</span>]] {[[Special:Contributions/Praseodymium-141|contribs]]}</b> 07:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' per [[WP:ALUM]] per all the previous history. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 08:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:08, 28 December 2024

Good articleAluminium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 29, 2005Good article nomineeListed
August 10, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 2, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2024

The boiling point of Aluminum is stated to be 2743 K but it should be 2793 K. Sources: NIST This paper Seeenman (talk) 05:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seeenman:  Not done. That 2743 K value comes from this[1], which is newer (2011) than the sources you given (1987–1988). --Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks. Perhaps that could be added as a reference on the page? Something like
2743 K ​(2470 °C, ​4478 °F)[2] Seeenman (talk) 16:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! 169.233.202.227 (talk) 22:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Zhang, Yiming; Evans, Julian R. G.; Yang, Shoufeng (2011). "Corrected Values for Boiling Points and Enthalpies of Vaporization of Elements in Handbooks". J. Chem. Eng. Data. 56 (2): 328–337. doi:10.1021/je1011086.
  2. ^ Zhang, Yiming; Evans, Julian R. G.; Yang, Shoufeng (2011). "Corrected Values for Boiling Points and Enthalpies of Vaporization of Elements in Handbooks". J. Chem. Eng. Data. 56 (2): 328–337. doi:10.1021/je1011086.

reference removed, mouse≠person

ref name="Ullmann" does not support "Aluminium sulfate has an LD50 of 6207 mg/kg (oral, mouse), which corresponds to 435 grams (about one pound) for a 70 kg (150 lb) person." I've also changed person to mouse because toxicity is different in different species.

Darsie42 (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately this leaves us trying to imagine a 70kg mouse. Perhaps it would be better to remove the relative clause entirely. 80.6.246.2 (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that extrapolating cross-species without a direct cite is a problem (WP:OR). Just state the LD50 as the ref supports it. DMacks (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2024

In the section titled "Earth" under the natural occurrence tab it's stated that "Aluminium also occurs in seawater at a concentration of 2 μg/kg." when I went to the referenced material [33] I wasn't able to find that value. If this could be double checked and adjusted if need be, that would be great. I also got a separate average concentration of sea water as 0.42 µg/L with a standard deviation of 0.70 µg/L (or 0.41 µg/kg with a standard deviation of 0.68 µg/kg) from a more recent study in 2020.(https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00468/full#T2) These values can be found on table two and are measured in nanomoles, but should convert over. Xcl-aspiringscientist (talk) 03:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, cheers for doing the converting Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 09:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it sold in England? If so, which way do they label it? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots03:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]